RECESSION: A Heightened Risk in 2026?

Posted on December 13, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

The U.S. faces a heightened risk of recession in 2026, with economic indicators, expert forecasts, and global instability contributing to widespread concern. While some analysts remain cautiously optimistic, the probability of a downturn is significant.

The potential for a U.S. recession in 2026 is a topic of growing concern among economists, policymakers, and investors. According to UBS, the probability of a recession has surged to 93% based on hard data analysis, including employment trends, industrial production, and credit market signals. This alarming figure reflects a convergence of economic stressors that could culminate in a downturn by the end of 2026.

One of the most prominent warning signs is the inverted yield curve, a historically reliable predictor of recessions. When short-term interest rates exceed long-term rates, it suggests that investors expect weaker growth ahead. This inversion, coupled with elevated federal debt and persistent inflationary pressures, has led many analysts to forecast a slowdown in consumer spending and business investment.

Despite these concerns, some sectors—particularly artificial intelligence (AI)—are providing temporary buoyancy. The AI infrastructure boom has fueled GDP growth and market optimism, with global AI investment projected to reach $500 billion by 2026.

However, experts warn that this surge may be masking underlying economic fragility. If AI-driven investment slows, the economy could quickly lose momentum, revealing vulnerabilities in other sectors such as manufacturing and retail.

Global factors also play a critical role. Trade tensions, geopolitical instability, and fluctuating oil prices have created an unpredictable environment. The lingering effects of tariff pass-throughs and policy uncertainty are expected to intensify in 2026, further straining the U.S. economy. Additionally, speculative forecasts—like those from mystic Baba Vanga—have captured public imagination by predicting a “cash crush” that could disrupt both virtual and physical currency systems, although such claims lack empirical support. Not all forecasts are dire. Oxford Economics suggests that while growth will moderate, the U.S. may avoid a full-blown recession thanks to continued investment incentives and robust AI-related spending. Their above-consensus GDP forecast hinges on the assumption that business confidence remains stable and that fiscal policy supports non-AI sectors effectively.

Nevertheless, the risks are real and multifaceted. The Polymarket prediction platform currently estimates a 43% chance of a U.S. recession by the end of 2026, based on criteria such as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth or an official declaration by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

In conclusion, while the U.S. economy may continue to navigate “choppy waters,” the potential for a recession in 2026 is substantial. Policymakers must remain vigilant, balancing stimulus with fiscal discipline, and addressing structural weaknesses before temporary growth drivers fade.

The coming year will be pivotal in determining whether the U.S. can steer clear of recession or succumb to the mounting pressures.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", economics, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

FINANCIAL ADVISOR COMMISSIONS: Fee-Only VERSUS Fee-Based Awareness

Posted on December 11, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

***

***

When individuals seek financial advice, one of the most important considerations is how their advisor is compensated. The structure of payment not only influences the advisor’s incentives but also shapes the client’s trust in the relationship. Two common models dominate the financial services industry: fee‑only and fee‑based commissions. While they may sound similar, they represent distinct approaches with meaningful implications for both advisors and clients.

Fee‑only compensation means that an advisor is paid exclusively through fees charged directly to the client. These fees can take the form of hourly rates, flat fees, or a percentage of assets under management. The critical point is that the advisor does not earn commissions from selling financial products. This structure is designed to minimize conflicts of interest, as the advisor’s income is tied solely to the client’s willingness to pay for advice. In theory, this creates a purer advisory relationship, where recommendations are based on what is best for the client rather than what generates additional revenue for the advisor. Clients often perceive fee‑only advisors as more transparent, since the costs are clear and predictable.

On the other hand, fee‑based commissions combine two streams of compensation: fees paid by the client and commissions earned from selling financial products such as insurance policies, mutual funds, or annuities. This hybrid model allows advisors to charge for their time and expertise while also benefiting financially from product sales. Supporters of fee‑based structures argue that it provides flexibility, enabling advisors to offer a wider range of services and products. For example, an advisor might charge a planning fee while also earning a commission for placing a client in a suitable insurance policy. This can be convenient for clients who prefer a one‑stop shop for both advice and product implementation.

However, the fee‑based model raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Because advisors can earn commissions, there is a risk that recommendations may be influenced by the financial incentives tied to specific products. Even if the advisor genuinely believes the product is appropriate, the dual compensation structure can create doubt in the client’s mind. Transparency becomes more complicated, as clients must distinguish between the advisory fee and the embedded commissions within financial products. This complexity can erode trust if not managed carefully.

***

http://www.HealthDictionarySeries.org

***

The choice between fee‑only and fee‑based ultimately depends on the client’s priorities. Those who value independence, clarity, and a strictly advisory relationship may gravitate toward fee‑only advisors. They may feel reassured knowing that their advisor’s livelihood depends solely on the quality of advice provided. Conversely, clients who appreciate convenience and the ability to access both advice and product solutions in one place may find fee‑based arrangements appealing. For them, the potential conflict of interest is outweighed by the practicality of bundled services.

In conclusion, fee‑only and fee‑based commissions represent two distinct philosophies in financial advising. Fee‑only emphasizes transparency and independence, while fee‑based offers flexibility and product access. Understanding these differences empowers clients to make informed decisions about the kind of advisory relationship they want. Ultimately, the best choice is the one that aligns with the client’s values, comfort level, and financial goals.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

BREAKING NEWS! Jerome Powell Reduces FOMC Rates

Posted on December 10, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

***

***

The Federal Reserve’s decision today to reduce the federal funds rate marks a pivotal moment in the central bank’s ongoing effort to navigate a complicated economic landscape. Under the leadership of Chair Jerome Powell, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to cut its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points, bringing the target range down to 3.50%–3.75%. This move, the third rate cut of the year, reflects the Fed’s attempt to balance persistent inflation pressures with signs of weakening momentum in the labor market and broader economy.

Powell’s approach has been defined by caution, flexibility, and a willingness to adjust policy as new data emerges. Today’s cut underscores that philosophy. Although inflation has eased from its peak, it remains elevated enough to warrant vigilance. At the same time, job growth has slowed, and several indicators point to cooling demand. By trimming rates, the Fed aims to support economic activity without reigniting the inflationary surge that dominated the previous two years.

The decision was not without internal debate. Members of the committee were divided, with some arguing that further easing risks undermining progress on inflation, while others warned that failing to act could deepen labor‑market weakness. Powell acknowledged these tensions in his remarks, emphasizing that there is “no risk‑free path” and that the committee must weigh competing risks carefully. His message suggested that while the Fed is open to additional cuts if conditions deteriorate, the bar for further action has risen now that rates are approaching what policymakers view as a neutral range.

Financial markets reacted swiftly. Equities rallied on expectations that lower borrowing costs will support corporate earnings and investment. Bond yields dipped as investors priced in a more accommodative policy stance. Yet the broader economic implications will unfold over time. For households, the cut may translate into slightly lower rates on mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards, offering modest relief. For businesses, cheaper financing could encourage expansion and hiring.

Today’s rate reduction highlights the delicate balancing act facing the Federal Reserve. Powell must steer the economy between the twin risks of inflation and recession, all while navigating political scrutiny and incomplete economic data. The latest move signals confidence that the economy can regain momentum without sacrificing price stability, but it also reflects the uncertainty that continues to shape monetary policy. As the year draws to a close, the Fed’s actions today will play a central role in shaping the economic trajectory of the months ahead.

***

***

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

PREDICTION MARKETS: Uniting Economics, Finance and Collective Intelligence

Posted on December 4, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

The Case of Kalshi

Financial prediction markets represent a fascinating intersection of economics, finance, and collective intelligence. Unlike traditional stock or commodity markets, these platforms allow participants to trade contracts whose value depends on the outcome of real‑world events. Kalshi, one of the most prominent examples, has emerged as a regulated exchange in the United States where individuals can buy and sell event contracts tied to measurable outcomes such as inflation rates, interest rate decisions, or even the release of government data. These markets transform uncertainty into tradable assets, offering both a mechanism for hedging risk and a tool for aggregating information.

At their core, prediction markets operate on a simple principle: the price of a contract reflects the probability of an event occurring. If a contract pays one dollar if the Federal Reserve raises interest rates at its next meeting, and it trades at seventy cents, the market is signaling a seventy percent chance of that outcome. This pricing mechanism is not dictated by a single analyst or institution but emerges from the collective actions of traders who bring diverse knowledge, expectations, and incentives to the table. The result is a dynamic forecast that updates in real time as new information becomes available.

Kalshi distinguishes itself by focusing on financial and economic events rather than purely political or cultural ones. Its contracts cover topics such as monthly inflation figures, unemployment rates, GDP growth, and central bank decisions. For businesses and investors, these markets provide a way to hedge against risks that are otherwise difficult to manage. A company worried about rising inflation can take positions in Kalshi’s inflation contracts, effectively offsetting potential losses in its operations. Similarly, an investor anticipating a change in interest rates can use event contracts to protect their portfolio or speculate on outcomes. In this sense, prediction markets serve both speculative and risk‑management purposes, much like traditional derivatives.

The appeal of financial prediction markets lies in their ability to aggregate dispersed information. Economists have long argued that markets are efficient at processing data because prices reflect the collective wisdom of participants. Prediction markets extend this logic to events that are not strictly financial but have financial consequences. By allowing traders to express their beliefs in monetary terms, these markets generate probabilities that often rival or surpass expert forecasts. For example, the probability of a rate hike inferred from Kalshi’s contracts may provide a more accurate signal than surveys of economists, because traders have skin in the game and adjust their positions continuously.

Another important aspect of Kalshi is its regulatory status. Unlike many informal or crypto‑based prediction platforms, Kalshi operates as a regulated exchange in the United States. This gives it legitimacy and ensures compliance with financial laws. Regulation also allows institutional investors to participate with greater confidence, expanding the scope and liquidity of the market. The presence of oversight helps distinguish financial prediction markets from gambling, emphasizing their role as instruments for hedging and forecasting rather than mere speculation.

Despite their promise, prediction markets face challenges. Liquidity is a constant concern; without sufficient participation, prices may not accurately reflect probabilities. There is also the question of accessibility, as not all individuals or institutions are comfortable trading event contracts. Moreover, critics argue that prediction markets could influence the very events they are meant to forecast, particularly in sensitive areas like politics. Kalshi mitigates some of these concerns by focusing on measurable economic outcomes, which are less susceptible to manipulation.

CONCLUSION

Looking ahead, financial prediction markets like Kalshi may become an integral part of the financial ecosystem. As global uncertainty increases, businesses and investors seek tools to manage risks beyond traditional hedging instruments. Event contracts provide a novel way to do so, while simultaneously offering valuable insights into collective expectations. If adoption continues to grow, prediction markets could evolve into a mainstream source of information, complementing surveys, expert analysis, and traditional financial indicators.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

MUTUAL FUNDS: Closed End

Posted on November 30, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , | Comments Off on MUTUAL FUNDS: Closed End

FINANCIAL WARRANTS

Posted on November 29, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

BASIC DEFINITIONS

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

A financial warrant is similar to an option, but it is typically issued directly by a company rather than traded on an exchange. Warrants allow holders to purchase shares of the issuing company at a fixed price, known as the exercise price, within a specified time frame. Unlike options, which are standardized and traded on secondary markets, warrants are often attached to bonds or preferred stock as a “sweetener” to make those securities more attractive to investors.

🔑 Key Features of Warrants

  • Right, not obligation: Investors can choose whether to exercise the warrant depending on market conditions.
  • Longer maturity: Warrants often have longer lifespans than options, sometimes lasting several years.
  • Issued by companies: They are a direct financing tool, unlike exchange-traded options.
  • Dilution effect: When exercised, new shares are created, which can dilute existing shareholders’ equity.

📊 Types of Warrants

  • Equity warrants: Allow purchase of common stock at a set price.
  • Bond warrants: Sometimes attached to debt instruments, giving bondholders the right to buy equity.
  • Detachable vs. non-detachable: Detachable warrants can be traded separately from the bond or preferred share they were issued with, while non-detachable ones remain tied.
  • Exotic warrants: Some markets offer specialized versions, such as knock-out warrants or mini-futures, which add complexity and leverage.

💼 Uses in Corporate Finance

Companies issue warrants for several reasons:

  • Capital raising: Warrants encourage investors to buy bonds or preferred shares, providing immediate funding.
  • Employee incentives: Similar to stock options, warrants can reward employees with potential future equity.
  • Strategic deals: Warrants may be used in mergers or acquisitions to align interests between parties.

⚖️ Benefits and Risks

Benefits:

  • Provide leverage, allowing investors to control more shares with less capital.
  • Offer long-term exposure to a company’s growth potential.
  • Can enhance returns if the underlying stock price rises above the exercise price.

Risks:

  • Warrants may expire worthless if the stock price never exceeds the exercise price.
  • Dilution reduces the value of existing shares when warrants are exercised.
  • Higher volatility compared to traditional equity investments.

📌 Conclusion

Financial warrants occupy a unique space between corporate finance and speculative investing. They serve as capital-raising tools for companies and leveraged opportunities for investors, but they also carry risks of dilution and expiration without value. Understanding their mechanics, types, and strategic uses is essential for anyone navigating modern financial markets.

In essence, warrants are a bridge between debt and equity, offering flexibility to issuers and optionality to investors. Their role in corporate finance highlights the innovative ways companies structure securities to balance risk, reward, and capital needs.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

POSITION SIZING: How to Construct Portfolios That Protect You

Posted on November 25, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , | Comments Off on POSITION SIZING: How to Construct Portfolios That Protect You

FINRA: Role and Importance

Posted on November 22, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is a cornerstone of the U.S. financial system, serving as a self-regulatory organization that oversees brokerage firms and their registered representatives. Established in 2007 through the consolidation of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and the regulatory arm of the New York Stock Exchange, FINRA plays a critical role in maintaining market integrity, protecting investors, and ensuring that the securities industry operates fairly and transparently.

Origins and Mission

FINRA’s creation was driven by the need for a unified regulatory body that could streamline oversight of broker-dealers. Its mission is straightforward yet vital: to safeguard investors and promote market integrity. Unlike government agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), FINRA is a non-governmental organization, but it operates under the SEC’s supervision. This unique structure allows FINRA to act with agility while still being accountable to federal oversight.

Core Responsibilities

FINRA’s responsibilities are broad and multifaceted.

  • Licensing and Registration: FINRA ensures that brokers and brokerage firms meet professional standards before they can operate. This includes administering qualification exams such as the Series 7 and Series 63.
  • Rulemaking and Enforcement: FINRA develops rules that govern broker-dealer conduct and enforces them through disciplinary actions when violations occur.
  • Market Surveillance: FINRA monitors trading activity across U.S. markets to detect fraud, manipulation, or other irregularities.
  • Investor Education: Through initiatives like BrokerCheck, FINRA provides investors with tools to research brokers and firms, empowering them to make informed decisions.

Each of these functions contributes to a safer and more transparent marketplace.

Protecting Investors

Investor protection lies at the heart of FINRA’s mission. By enforcing ethical standards and monitoring trading practices, FINRA reduces the risk of misconduct such as insider trading, excessive risk-taking, or misleading investment advice. Its arbitration and mediation services also provide investors with avenues to resolve disputes with brokers outside of lengthy court proceedings. This combination of proactive regulation and accessible dispute resolution strengthens public trust in financial markets.

Challenges and Criticisms

Like any regulatory body, FINRA faces challenges. Critics argue that as a self-regulatory organization, it may be too close to the industry it oversees, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. Others question whether its penalties are sufficient to deter misconduct. Additionally, the rapid evolution of financial technology, cryptocurrency markets, and complex trading algorithms presents new regulatory hurdles. FINRA must continually adapt its rules and surveillance systems to keep pace with innovation.

Impact on the Financial System

Despite these challenges, FINRA’s impact is undeniable. By maintaining standards of conduct and transparency, it helps ensure that capital markets remain efficient and trustworthy. Investors, from individuals saving for retirement to institutions managing billions, rely on FINRA’s oversight to protect their interests. Broker-dealers, meanwhile, benefit from clear rules that create a level playing field and reduce systemic risk.

Conclusion

In summary, FINRA is an essential pillar of the U.S. financial regulatory framework. Its blend of licensing, rulemaking, enforcement, and investor education fosters confidence in the securities industry. While it must continue to evolve in response to technological and market changes, its mission remains constant: protecting investors and promoting integrity. Without FINRA’s presence, the risk of misconduct and instability in financial markets would be far greater. As the financial landscape grows more complex, FINRA’s role will only become more critical in ensuring that markets remain fair, transparent, and resilient.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

RISK ADJUSTED RATE OF RETURN: In Finance

Posted on November 21, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

In the realm of finance and investment, the pursuit of profit is inseparable from the presence of risk. Every investor, whether an individual or an institution, must grapple with the reality that higher returns often come with greater uncertainty. To evaluate investments effectively, it is not enough to look at raw returns alone. Instead, one must consider how much risk was undertaken to achieve those returns. This balance is captured by the concept of the risk-adjusted rate of return, a cornerstone of modern portfolio theory and investment analysis.

The risk-adjusted rate of return measures the profitability of an investment relative to the risk assumed. Unlike simple return calculations, which only show the percentage gain or loss, risk-adjusted metrics incorporate volatility and other forms of uncertainty. For example, two investments may both yield a 10% annual return, but if one is highly volatile and the other is stable, the stable investment is more attractive when viewed through a risk-adjusted lens. This approach ensures that investors are not misled by high returns that are achieved through excessive risk-taking.

Several tools have been developed to calculate risk-adjusted returns. The Sharpe Ratio is among the most widely used. It measures excess return per unit of risk, with risk defined as the standard deviation of returns. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates that an investment is delivering better returns for the level of risk taken. Another measure, the Treynor Ratio, evaluates returns relative to systematic risk, using beta as the risk measure. The Sortino Ratio refines the Sharpe Ratio by focusing only on downside volatility, thereby distinguishing between harmful risk and general fluctuations. Each of these metrics provides a different perspective, but all share the same goal: to assess whether the reward justifies the risk.

The importance of risk-adjusted returns extends beyond individual securities to entire portfolios. Portfolio managers use these metrics to compare strategies, evaluate asset allocations, and determine whether their investment approach aligns with client objectives. For instance, a hedge fund may report impressive raw returns, but if those returns are accompanied by extreme volatility, its risk-adjusted performance may be inferior to that of a conservative mutual fund. By incorporating risk-adjusted measures, investors can make more informed decisions and build portfolios that reflect their risk tolerance and long-term goals.

Risk-adjusted returns also play a vital role in distinguishing skill from luck in investment management. A manager who consistently delivers high risk-adjusted returns demonstrates genuine expertise in navigating markets. Conversely, a manager who achieves high raw returns through excessive risk-taking may simply be gambling with investor capital. This distinction is critical for institutions and individuals alike, as it ensures that performance evaluations are grounded in sustainability rather than short-term speculation.

Of course, risk-adjusted metrics are not without limitations. They often rely on historical data, which may not accurately predict future outcomes. Market conditions can change rapidly, and past volatility may not reflect future risks. Additionally, different metrics may yield conflicting results, complicating the decision-making process. Despite these challenges, risk-adjusted returns remain indispensable because they encourage investors to look beyond superficial gains and consider the broader context of risk management.

In conclusion, the risk-adjusted rate of return is a fundamental concept in investment analysis. By integrating both risk and reward into a single measure, it empowers investors to evaluate opportunities more effectively, compare diverse assets, and build resilient portfolios. While no metric is flawless, the emphasis on risk-adjusted performance ensures that investment decisions are not driven solely by the pursuit of high returns but by the pursuit of sustainable, well-balanced growth. In a financial landscape defined by uncertainty, the ability to measure success in terms of both profit and prudence is what ultimately separates wise investing from reckless speculation.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Interviews, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

MONEY SUPPLY: Measurement Tools

Posted on November 21, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

BASIC DEFINITIONS

***

***

Money supply measures—M0, M1, M2, and M3—are essential tools used by economists and policymakers to assess liquidity, guide monetary policy, and understand economic health. Each measure reflects a different level of liquidity and plays a unique role in financial analysis.

The money supply refers to the total amount of monetary assets available in an economy at a specific time. It includes various forms of money, ranging from physical currency to more liquid financial instruments. To better understand and manage economic activity, central banks and economists categorize money into different measures based on liquidity: M0, M1, M2, and M3.

M0, also known as the monetary base or base money, includes all physical currency in circulation—coins and paper money—plus reserves held by commercial banks at the central bank. It represents the most liquid form of money and is directly controlled by the central bank through tools like open market operations and reserve requirements.

M1 builds on M0 by adding demand deposits (checking accounts) and other liquid deposits that can be quickly converted into cash. It includes:

  • Physical currency held by the public
  • Traveler’s checks
  • Demand deposits at commercial banks

M1 is a key indicator of immediate spending power in the economy. A rapid increase in M1 can signal rising consumer activity, while a decline may indicate tightening liquidity.

M2 expands further by including near-money assets—those that are not as liquid as M1 but can be converted into cash relatively easily. M2 includes:

  • All components of M1
  • Savings deposits
  • Money market securities
  • Certificates of deposit (under $100,000)

M2 is widely used by economists and the Federal Reserve to gauge intermediate-term economic trends. It reflects both spending and saving behavior, making it a critical tool for forecasting inflation and guiding interest rate decisions.

M3, though no longer published by the Federal Reserve since 2006, includes M2 plus large time deposits, institutional money market funds, and other larger liquid assets. M3 provides a broader view of the money supply, especially useful for analyzing long-term investment trends and credit expansion. Some countries, like the UK and India, still track M3 for macroeconomic planning.

These measures are not just academic—they have real-world implications. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. saw a historic surge in M2 due to stimulus payments and quantitative easing. This expansion raised concerns about future inflation, which materialized in subsequent years. Monitoring money supply helps central banks adjust monetary policy to maintain price stability and support economic growth.

In conclusion, money supply measures offer a layered view of liquidity in the economy, from the most liquid (M0) to broader aggregates (M3).

Understanding these categories helps policymakers, investors, and businesses anticipate economic shifts, manage inflation, and make informed financial decisions.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

RISK ARBITRAGE: In Financial Markets

Posted on November 20, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Risk arbitrage, often referred to as merger arbitrage, is a specialized investment strategy that seeks to exploit pricing inefficiencies arising during corporate mergers, acquisitions, or other restructuring events. Unlike traditional arbitrage, which involves risk-free profit opportunities from price discrepancies across markets, risk arbitrage carries inherent uncertainty because it depends on the successful completion of corporate transactions. Despite its name, it is not risk-free; rather, it is a calculated approach to profiting from the probability of deal closure.

At its core, risk arbitrage involves buying the stock of a company being acquired and, in some cases, shorting the stock of the acquiring company. For example, if Company A announces it will acquire Company B at $50 per share, but Company B’s stock trades at $47, arbitrageurs may purchase shares of Company B, betting that the deal will close and the stock will rise to the agreed acquisition price. The $3 difference represents the potential arbitrage profit. However, this spread exists precisely because of uncertainty: regulatory approval, financing challenges, shareholder resistance, or unforeseen market conditions could derail the transaction, leaving arbitrageurs exposed to losses.

The practice of risk arbitrage has a long history in Wall Street. It gained prominence in the mid-20th century, particularly during the wave of conglomerate mergers in the 1960s and leveraged buyouts in the 1980s. Hedge funds and specialized arbitrage desks at investment banks became key players, using sophisticated models to assess the likelihood of deal completion. Today, risk arbitrage remains a central strategy for event-driven funds, which focus on corporate actions as catalysts for investment opportunities.

One of the defining features of risk arbitrage is its reliance on probability analysis. Investors must evaluate not only the financial terms of the deal but also the legal, regulatory, and political environment. For instance, antitrust regulators may block a merger if it reduces competition, or foreign investment committees may intervene in cross-border acquisitions. Arbitrageurs often assign probabilities to deal completion and calculate expected returns accordingly. A deal with high regulatory risk may offer a wider spread, but the probability of failure tempers the attractiveness of the trade.

Risk arbitrage also plays an important role in market efficiency. By narrowing the spread between target company stock prices and acquisition offers, arbitrageurs help align market prices with expected outcomes. Their activity provides liquidity to shareholders of target firms and signals market confidence—or skepticism—about deal success. In this sense, arbitrageurs act as informal referees of corporate transactions, reflecting collective judgment about feasibility.

Nevertheless, risk arbitrage is not without controversy. Critics argue that it can encourage speculative behavior and amplify volatility around merger announcements. Moreover, when deals collapse, arbitrageurs can suffer significant losses, as seen in high-profile failed mergers. The strategy requires not only financial acumen but also resilience in managing downside risk.

In conclusion, risk arbitrage is a sophisticated investment strategy that blends financial analysis with legal and regulatory insight. While it offers opportunities for profit, it demands careful risk management and a deep understanding of corporate dynamics. Far from being risk-free, it is a calculated gamble on the successful execution of complex transactions. For investors willing to navigate uncertainty, risk arbitrage remains a compelling, though challenging, avenue in modern financial markets.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

SPACs: Special Purpose Acquisition Companies

Posted on November 19, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

A Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) is a corporate entity created solely to raise capital through an initial public offering (IPO) with the intention of merging with or acquiring an existing private company. Unlike traditional firms, SPACs have no commercial operations at the time of their IPO. They exist as shell companies, holding investor funds in trust until a suitable target is identified. This unique structure has earned them the nickname “blank check companies.”

How SPACs Work

The lifecycle of a SPAC typically unfolds in three stages:

  • Formation and IPO: Sponsors—often experienced investors or industry executives—form the SPAC and take it public, raising funds from investors.
  • Target Search: The SPAC has a limited time frame, usually 18–24 months, to identify and negotiate with a private company to merge with.
  • De-SPAC Transaction: Once a merger is completed, the private company effectively becomes public, bypassing the traditional IPO process.

This process allows private firms to access public markets more quickly and with fewer regulatory hurdles compared to conventional IPOs.

Advantages of SPACs

SPACs gained traction because they offered several benefits:

  • Speed and Certainty: Traditional IPOs can be lengthy and uncertain, while SPACs provide a faster route to public markets.
  • Flexibility in Valuation: Unlike IPOs, SPACs can negotiate valuations directly with target companies.
  • Access to Expertise: Sponsors often bring industry knowledge and networks that can help the acquired company grow.
  • Investor Opportunity: Investors can participate early, with the option to redeem shares if they dislike the proposed merger.

Risks and Criticisms

Despite their appeal, SPACs are not without controversy:

  • Sponsor Incentives: Sponsors typically receive a significant stake (often 20%) at a low cost, which can misalign their interests with ordinary investors.
  • Uncertain Targets: Investors commit funds without knowing which company will be acquired, creating risk.
  • Performance Concerns: Studies show that many SPACs underperform after completing mergers, with share prices often declining.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: Authorities have warned investors to carefully evaluate SPACs, especially regarding projections of future performance, which are less restricted than in IPOs.

Historical Context and Trends

SPACs first appeared in the 1990s but remained niche until the early 2020s, when they experienced a boom. In 2020 and 2021, hundreds of SPAC IPOs raised billions of dollars, fueled by market liquidity and investor enthusiasm. High-profile deals, such as DraftKings and Virgin Galactic, brought attention to the model. However, by the mid-2020s, enthusiasm cooled due to poor post-merger performance and tighter regulations.

Conclusion

SPACs represent a fascinating innovation in financial markets, offering an alternative to traditional IPOs. Their advantages in speed, flexibility, and access to capital made them attractive during periods of market optimism. Yet, their risks—misaligned incentives, uncertain outcomes, and regulatory challenges—have tempered investor enthusiasm. While SPACs are unlikely to disappear entirely, their future will depend on whether they can evolve into a more transparent and sustainable mechanism for taking companies public.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

STOCK MARKET CRASHES: More Likely in the Fall?

Posted on November 18, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

+ Plus / – Minus Two Weeks

Stock market crashes have long been associated with the fall season, particularly October, which has earned a reputation as a month of financial turmoil. While crashes can occur at any time, the clustering of several historic downturns in autumn has led many investors to believe that markets are more vulnerable during this period.

Historical Patterns of Fall Crashes

Some of the most devastating collapses in financial history have taken place in the fall. The Wall Street Crash of 1929 began in late October and marked the start of the Great Depression. In October 1987, markets experienced “Black Monday,” when the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged more than 20% in a single day. More recently, the global financial crisis of 2008 saw some of its steepest declines in September and October. These events have cemented autumn’s reputation as a season of heightened risk.

Why the Fall Is Riskier

Several factors contribute to the perception that fall is a dangerous time for markets:

  • Investor psychology: The memory of past crashes in October can heighten anxiety, making traders more prone to panic selling.
  • Fiscal cycles: Many institutional investors close their books at the end of September, leading to portfolio adjustments and sell-offs in October.
  • Economic data releases: Key reports on employment, corporate earnings, and government budgets often arrive in the fall, influencing sentiment.
  • Global events: Political and economic developments frequently coincide with autumn months, adding uncertainty.

Statistical Evidence and Skepticism

Despite the historical examples, statistical studies suggest that crashes are not inherently more likely in October than in other months. Market downturns are rare events, and their clustering in autumn may be more coincidence than causation. Crashes have also occurred outside the fall, such as the bursting of the dot-com bubble in spring 2000 and the COVID-19 crash in March 2020. This suggests that the so-called “October Effect” may be more psychological than empirical.

Lessons for Investors

Whether or not fall crashes are statistically more likely, the historical record offers important lessons:

  • Diversify investments to reduce vulnerability to sudden downturns.
  • Avoid panic selling, since many crashes are followed by rapid recoveries.
  • Prepare for volatility, as autumn often brings heightened uncertainty.

Conclusion

Stock market crashes are not guaranteed to happen in the fall, but history has made October synonymous with financial turmoil. The clustering of major downturns during this season has created a psychological bias that influences investor behavior. Whether coincidence or pattern, the lesson is clear: autumn is a time when vigilance, discipline, and preparation are especially important for market participants.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

BUTTERFLY SPREAD INVESTING

Posted on November 17, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Investing in Butterfly Spreads

Options trading provides investors with a wide range of strategies to suit different market conditions. One of the more refined approaches is the butterfly spread, a strategy designed to profit from stability in the price of an underlying asset. It combines multiple option contracts at different strike prices to create a position with limited risk and limited reward. The name comes from the shape of its profit-and-loss diagram, which resembles the wings of a butterfly.

Structure of the Strategy

A typical butterfly spread involves four options contracts with three strike prices. In a long call butterfly spread, the investor buys one call at a lower strike, sells two calls at a middle strike, and buys one call at a higher strike. This creates a payoff that peaks if the underlying asset closes at the middle strike price. Losses are capped at the initial premium paid, while profits are capped at the difference between the strikes minus the premium.

Variations of Butterfly Spreads

Butterfly spreads can be built with calls, puts, or a mix of both:

  • Long Call Butterfly: Profits if the asset stays near the middle strike.
  • Long Put Butterfly: Similar structure but using puts.
  • Iron Butterfly: Combines calls and puts, selling an at-the-money straddle and buying protective wings.
  • Reverse Iron Butterfly: Designed to benefit from sharp price movements and volatility.

Each variation adapts to different market expectations, but all share the principle of balancing risk and reward.

Benefits of Butterfly Spreads

  • Defined Risk: The maximum loss is known upfront.
  • Cost Efficiency: Requires less capital than outright buying options.
  • Neutral Outlook: Works best when the investor expects little price movement.
  • Flexibility: Can be tailored to different market conditions with calls, puts, or combinations.

Drawbacks and Risks

  • Limited Profit Potential: Gains are capped, which may not appeal to aggressive traders.
  • Dependence on Timing: The strategy works only if the asset closes near the middle strike at expiration.
  • Complexity: Requires careful planning of strike prices and expiration dates.

Example in Practice

Suppose a stock trades at $100, and the investor expects it to remain near that level. They could set up a butterfly spread with strikes at $95, $100, and $105. If the stock closes at $100, the strategy delivers maximum profit. If the stock moves significantly away from $100, the investor’s loss is limited to the premium paid. This makes the butterfly spread particularly useful in calm, low-volatility markets.

Conclusion

The butterfly spread is a disciplined options strategy that thrives in stable markets. It offers a balance between risk control and profit potential, making it attractive to traders who prefer structured outcomes. While the rewards are capped, the defined risk and cost efficiency make butterfly spreads a valuable tool for investors who anticipate minimal price movement and want to manage their exposure carefully.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

CASH BALANCE PLANS: Hybrid Retirement Savings for Physicians

Posted on November 17, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Retirement planning has evolved significantly over the past several decades, with employers and employees seeking solutions that balance security, flexibility, and predictability. Among the various retirement plan options available today, cash balance plans stand out as a hybrid design that combines features of both traditional defined benefit pensions and defined contribution plans. Their unique structure makes them an attractive choice for employers aiming to provide meaningful retirement benefits while maintaining financial predictability.

At their core, cash balance plans are a type of defined benefit plan. Unlike traditional pensions, which promise retirees a monthly income based on years of service and final salary, cash balance plans define the benefit in terms of a hypothetical account balance. Each participant’s account grows annually through two components: a “pay credit” and an “interest credit.” The pay credit is typically a percentage of the employee’s salary or a flat dollar amount, while the interest credit is either a fixed rate or tied to an index such as U.S. Treasury yields. Although the account is hypothetical—meaning the funds are not actually segregated for each employee—the structure provides participants with a clear, understandable statement of their retirement benefit.

One of the primary advantages of cash balance plans is their transparency. Employees can easily track the growth of their account balance, much like they would with a 401(k). This clarity helps workers better understand the value of their retirement benefits and fosters a sense of ownership. Additionally, cash balance plans are portable: when employees leave a company, they can roll over the vested balance into an IRA or another qualified plan, ensuring continuity in retirement savings.

***

***

From the employer’s perspective, cash balance plans offer several benefits as well. Traditional pensions often create unpredictable liabilities, as they depend on factors such as longevity and investment performance. Cash balance plans, by contrast, provide more predictable costs because the employer commits to specific pay and interest credits. This predictability makes them easier to manage and budget for, particularly in industries where workforce mobility is high. Moreover, cash balance plans can be designed to reward long-term employees while still appealing to younger workers who value portability.

Despite these advantages, cash balance plans are not without challenges. Because they are defined benefit plans, employers bear the investment risk and must ensure the plan is adequately funded. Regulatory requirements, including nondiscrimination testing and funding rules, add complexity and administrative costs. Additionally, while cash balance plans are generally more equitable across generations of workers, transitions from traditional pensions to cash balance designs have sometimes sparked controversy, particularly among older employees who may perceive a reduction in benefits.

In recent years, cash balance plans have gained popularity among professional firms, such as law practices and medical groups, as well as small businesses seeking tax-efficient retirement solutions. These plans allow owners and highly compensated employees to accumulate larger retirement savings than would be possible under defined contribution limits, while still providing benefits to rank-and-file workers. As such, they serve as a valuable tool for both talent retention and financial planning.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Subscribe and Refer

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, Ask a Doctor, finance, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management, Retirement and Benefits, Taxation, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

ADRs: Bridging Global Capital Markets

Posted on November 16, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

American Depository Receipts Defined

In the modern era of globalization, financial instruments that connect investors across borders have become indispensable. Among these, American Depository Receipts (ADRs) stand out as a powerful mechanism that allows U.S. investors to participate in foreign equity markets without the complexities of international trading. ADRs not only simplify access to global companies but also enhance the ability of foreign corporations to raise capital in the United States. This essay explores the origins, structure, regulatory frameworks, benefits, risks, and real-world examples of ADRs, highlighting their role in the integration of global finance.

Historical Development

The concept of ADRs emerged in 1927 when J.P. Morgan introduced the first ADR for the British retailer Selfridges. At the time, American investors faced significant hurdles in purchasing foreign shares, including currency conversion, unfamiliar trading practices, and regulatory differences. ADRs solved these problems by creating a U.S.-based certificate that represented ownership in foreign shares, denominated in dollars, and traded on American exchanges.

Over the decades, ADRs expanded rapidly, especially during the post-World War II era when globalization accelerated. By the late 20th century, ADRs had become a mainstream tool for accessing international equities, with companies from Europe, Asia, and Latin America increasingly using them to tap into U.S. capital markets.

Structure and Mechanics

An ADR is issued by a U.S. depositary bank, which holds the underlying shares of a foreign company in custody. Each ADR corresponds to a specific number of shares—sometimes one, sometimes multiple, or even a fraction. Investors buy and sell ADRs in U.S. dollars, and dividends are paid in dollars as well, eliminating the need for currency conversion.

Key structural features include:

  • Depositary Banks: Institutions such as J.P. Morgan, Citibank, and Bank of New York Mellon act as custodians and issuers of ADRs.
  • ADR Ratios: The number of foreign shares represented by one ADR can vary, allowing flexibility in pricing.
  • Trading Platforms: ADRs can be listed on major exchanges like the NYSE or NASDAQ, or traded over-the-counter.

Regulatory Framework

ADRs are subject to U.S. securities regulations, which vary depending on the level of ADR issued:

  • Level I ADRs: Traded over-the-counter, requiring minimal disclosure. They are primarily used for visibility rather than fundraising.
  • Level II ADRs: Listed on U.S. exchanges, requiring compliance with SEC reporting standards, including reconciliation of financial statements to U.S. GAAP or IFRS.
  • Level III ADRs: Allow foreign companies to raise capital directly in U.S. markets through public offerings. These require the highest level of regulatory compliance, including registration with the SEC and adherence to corporate governance standards.

This tiered system ensures that investors receive appropriate levels of transparency while giving foreign companies flexibility in their approach to U.S. markets.

Benefits for Investors

ADRs offer numerous advantages to American investors:

  • Convenience: Investors can buy shares in foreign companies without dealing with foreign exchanges or currencies.
  • Diversification: ADRs provide access to global firms across industries, enhancing portfolio diversification.
  • Transparency: ADRs listed on U.S. exchanges must comply with SEC regulations, ensuring reliable financial reporting.
  • Liquidity: ADRs trade on familiar platforms, making them easily accessible to retail and institutional investors alike.

Benefits for Companies

Foreign corporations also benefit significantly from ADRs:

  • Access to Capital: ADRs open the door to the world’s largest pool of investors.
  • Global Visibility: Listing in the U.S. enhances reputation and credibility.
  • Improved Liquidity: Shares become more widely traded, increasing market efficiency.
  • Investor Base Diversification: Companies can attract both domestic and international investors, reducing reliance on local markets.

Risks and Challenges

Despite their advantages, ADRs carry certain risks:

  • Currency Risk: ADR values are tied to foreign shares denominated in local currencies, making them vulnerable to exchange rate fluctuations.
  • Political and Economic Risk: Instability in the issuing company’s home country can affect performance.
  • Taxation: Dividends may be subject to foreign withholding taxes before conversion to U.S. dollars.
  • Regulatory Differences: Even with SEC oversight, differences in accounting standards and corporate governance can pose challenges.

Case Studies

1. Alibaba Group (China) Alibaba’s ADRs, listed on the NYSE in 2014, marked one of the largest IPOs in history, raising $25 billion. This demonstrated the power of ADRs to connect Chinese companies with American investors, despite regulatory complexities between the two countries.

2. Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan) Toyota’s ADRs have long provided U.S. investors with access to one of the world’s largest automakers. By listing ADRs, Toyota expanded its investor base and strengthened its global presence.

3. Royal Dutch Shell (Netherlands/UK) Shell’s ADRs illustrate how multinational corporations use ADRs to maintain visibility in U.S. markets while managing complex cross-border structures.

The Role of ADRs in Global Finance

ADRs embody the globalization of capital markets. They facilitate cross-border investment, enhance market efficiency, and foster economic integration. For investors, ADRs represent a gateway to international diversification. For companies, they provide access to the deepest capital markets in the world.

Conclusion

American Depositary Receipts are more than just financial instruments; they are symbols of global interconnectedness. By bridging the gap between U.S. investors and foreign companies, ADRs have reshaped the landscape of international finance. They balance convenience with exposure to global risks, offering both opportunities and challenges. As globalization continues to evolve, ADRs will remain a vital tool for investors and corporations alike, reinforcing their role as a cornerstone of modern capital markets.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Glossary Terms, Marcinko Associates, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

VOLATILITY INDICES: In Financial Markets

Posted on November 15, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR. http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

The Role of Volatility Indices in Financial Markets

Volatility is often described as the pulse of financial markets, reflecting the collective emotions of investors as they respond to uncertainty, risk, and opportunity. Among the many tools designed to measure this phenomenon, the CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, stands out as the most widely recognized. Dubbed the “fear gauge,” the VIX captures market expectations of near-term volatility in the S&P 500, derived from options pricing. Its movements often mirror investor sentiment: rising sharply during periods of crisis and falling when confidence returns. Yet, the VIX is not alone. A family of volatility indices exists across global markets, each offering unique insights into sector-specific or regional risk.

The importance of volatility indices lies in their ability to quantify uncertainty. Traditional measures such as historical volatility look backward, analyzing past price fluctuations. In contrast, indices like the VIX are forward-looking, reflecting implied volatility based on options markets. This distinction makes them invaluable for traders, portfolio managers, and policymakers. For example, a sudden spike in the VIX often signals heightened fear, prompting investors to hedge positions or reduce exposure to equities. Conversely, a low VIX suggests complacency, though it can also precede unexpected shocks.

Beyond the VIX, other indices provide complementary perspectives. The VXN tracks volatility in the Nasdaq-100, often dominated by technology stocks. Because the tech sector is highly sensitive to innovation cycles and regulatory changes, the VXN can diverge significantly from the VIX, highlighting sector-specific risks. Similarly, the RVX measures volatility in the Russell 2000, offering a window into small-cap stocks that are more vulnerable to domestic economic conditions. Internationally, indices such as the VSTOXX in Europe and India VIX extend this framework globally, allowing investors to compare risk sentiment across regions. Together, these indices form a mosaic of market psychology, enabling a more nuanced understanding of global financial stability.

Volatility indices also play a crucial role in risk management. Derivatives linked to these indices, such as futures and exchange-traded products, allow investors to hedge against sudden downturns. For instance, during the 2008 financial crisis, demand for VIX futures surged as investors sought protection from extreme market swings. More recently, volatility products have become popular among retail traders, though their complexity and tendency to lose value over time make them risky for long-term holding.

Critics argue that volatility indices can be misleading. A low VIX does not guarantee stability, and a high VIX does not always signal disaster. Moreover, the rise of volatility-linked products has occasionally amplified market stress, as seen during the “Volmageddon” event of February 2018, when inverse volatility ETFs collapsed. These episodes underscore the need for caution: volatility indices are powerful tools, but they must be used with a clear understanding of their limitations.

In conclusion, volatility indices such as the VIX serve as vital instruments for gauging investor sentiment and managing risk. They provide a forward-looking measure of uncertainty, complementing traditional metrics and offering insights across sectors and regions. While not infallible, their role in modern finance is undeniable.

For traders, analysts, and policymakers alike, these indices are more than numbers on a screen—they are reflections of the market’s collective psyche, guiding decisions in times of both calm and crisis.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

SILVER: Role in a Diversified Investment Portfolio

Posted on November 14, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Silver occupies a distinctive position within the realm of investment assets, functioning simultaneously as a precious metal and an industrial commodity. This dual nature imbues silver with characteristics that make it a valuable component of a diversified portfolio, offering both defensive qualities and growth potential. While its volatility necessitates careful consideration, silver’s unique attributes warrant attention from investors seeking balance between risk mitigation and opportunity.

Silver as a Hybrid Asset

Unlike gold, which is primarily regarded as a store of value, silver derives a substantial portion of its demand from industrial applications. It is indispensable in sectors such as electronics, renewable energy, and medical technology, with photovoltaic cells in solar panels representing a particularly significant driver of consumption. This industrial utility ensures that silver’s price is influenced not only by macroeconomic uncertainty but also by technological innovation and global manufacturing trends. Consequently, silver provides investors with exposure to both traditional safe-haven dynamics and cyclical industrial growth.

Accessibility and Cost Efficiency

Silver’s affordability relative to gold enhances its appeal to a broad spectrum of investors. Physical silver, in the form of coins and bars, allows individuals with modest capital to participate in the precious metals market. Moreover, financial instruments such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and mining equities provide liquid and scalable avenues for investment. This accessibility ensures that silver can serve as an entry point into alternative assets, particularly for those seeking to hedge against inflation without committing substantial resources.

Inflation Hedge and Currency Protection

Historically, silver has demonstrated resilience during periods of inflation and currency depreciation. As fiat currencies lose purchasing power, tangible assets such as silver tend to appreciate, preserving wealth for investors. Although gold is often considered the primary hedge, silver’s similar properties, combined with its lower cost, render it a practical complement. In times of geopolitical instability or monetary expansion, silver can function as a safeguard against systemic risks.

Volatility and Associated Risks

Despite its advantages, silver is characterized by pronounced price volatility. Its smaller market size relative to gold renders it more susceptible to speculative trading and abrupt shifts in investor sentiment. Furthermore, fluctuations in industrial demand can amplify short-term price movements. While this volatility can generate significant returns, it also exposes investors to heightened risk. Accordingly, silver is best employed as a long-term holding within a diversified portfolio rather than as a vehicle for short-term speculation.

Portfolio Diversification and Investment Vehicles

Incorporating silver into a portfolio enhances diversification by introducing an asset class with low correlation to equities and fixed income securities. This non-correlation reduces overall portfolio risk and provides stability during market downturns. Investors may access silver through several channels: physical bullion for tangible ownership, ETFs for liquidity, mining stocks for leveraged exposure, and futures contracts for advanced strategies. Each vehicle entails distinct risk-reward profiles, enabling investors to tailor their approach according to objectives and tolerance.

Conclusion

Silver’s dual identity as both a precious metal and an industrial commodity distinguishes it from other investment assets. Its affordability, inflation-hedging capacity, and diversification benefits make it a compelling addition to portfolios. While volatility requires prudent management, silver’s potential to balance defensive and growth-oriented strategies underscores its enduring relevance in contemporary investment practice.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

MONEY: Macro-Economic Velocity

Posted on November 14, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

BASIC DEFINITIONS

***

***

The velocity of money is a fundamental concept in macroeconomics that measures how quickly money circulates through the economy. It reflects the frequency with which a unit of currency is used to purchase goods and services within a given time period. This metric is crucial for understanding economic activity, inflation, and the effectiveness of monetary policy.

At its core, the velocity of money is calculated using the formula:

Velocity = GDPMoney Supply\text{Velocity} = \frac{\text{GDP}}{\text{Money Supply}}

This equation shows how many times money turns over in the economy to support a given level of economic output. For example, if the GDP is $20 trillion and the money supply (say, M2) is $10 trillion, the velocity is 2—meaning each dollar is used twice in a year to purchase goods and services.

There are different measures of money supply used in this calculation, most commonly M1 and M2. M1 includes the most liquid forms of money, such as cash and checking deposits, while M2 includes M1 plus savings accounts and other near-money assets. The choice of which measure to use depends on the context and the specific economic analysis being conducted.

The velocity of money is influenced by several factors:

  • Consumer and business confidence: When people feel optimistic about the economy, they are more likely to spend rather than save, increasing velocity.
  • Interest rates: Higher interest rates can encourage saving and reduce spending, lowering velocity. Conversely, lower rates can stimulate borrowing and spending.
  • Inflation expectations: If people expect prices to rise, they may spend more quickly, increasing velocity.
  • Technological and structural changes: Innovations in digital payments and shifts in consumer behavior can also affect how quickly money moves.

Historically, the velocity of money has fluctuated with economic cycles. During periods of economic expansion, velocity tends to rise as spending increases. In contrast, during recessions or periods of uncertainty, velocity often falls as consumers and businesses hold onto cash. For instance, during the 2008 financial crisis and the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, velocity dropped sharply due to reduced consumer spending and increased saving.

In recent years, the U.S. has experienced persistently low velocity, even amid significant increases in the money supply. This phenomenon has puzzled economists and raised questions about the effectiveness of monetary policy. Despite aggressive stimulus measures, much of the new money has remained in savings or financial markets rather than circulating through the real economy.

Understanding the velocity of money is essential for policymakers. A low velocity may signal weak demand and justify expansionary fiscal or monetary policies. Conversely, a high velocity could indicate overheating and the need for tightening measures to prevent inflation.

In conclusion, the velocity of money is a dynamic indicator of economic vitality. It helps economists and central banks assess the flow of money, the strength of demand, and the potential for inflation.

While often overlooked by the public, it plays a vital role in shaping economic policy and understanding the broader health of the economy.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

REAL-WORLD FINANCE: How Some RNs Can Retire Richer Than Physicians

Posted on November 13, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

For generations, the prevailing belief in healthcare has been that physicians [MD, DO and DPM], with their high salaries and prestige, inevitably retire wealthier than nurses. Yet this assumption overlooks the financial realities of different nursing specialties and the long‑term impact of debt, lifestyle, and retirement planning. In fact, some Registered Nurses (RNs)—particularly Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), visiting nurses, and those who participate in structured pay programs like the Baylor plan—can retire richer than physicians. The reasons lie in the interplay of education costs, career flexibility, income potential, and disciplined financial planning.

Education Costs and Debt Burden

One of the most decisive factors shaping retirement wealth is the cost of education. Physicians often spend over a decade in training, including undergraduate studies, medical school, and residency. This path not only delays their earning years but also saddles them with substantial student debt. The median medical school debt in the United States exceeds $200,000, and many physicians spend years paying it down.

By contrast, RNs typically complete their training in two to four years, with advanced practice nurses such as CRNAs requiring graduate‑level education. Even so, their debt burden is far lighter, often less than half of what physicians carry. This difference means nurses can begin earning earlier, save for retirement sooner, and avoid the crushing interest payments that erode physicians’ wealth. A CRNA who starts practicing in their late twenties may already be investing in retirement accounts while a physician is still in residency earning a modest stipend.

Income Potential of Specialized Nurses

While physicians generally earn more annually than nurses, the gap is narrower in certain specialties. CRNAs, for example, are among the highest‑paid nursing professionals, with average salaries often exceeding $200,000 per year. This places them in direct competition with some physician specialties, especially primary care doctors, who may earn similar or even lower salaries.

Visiting nurses also benefit from unique financial advantages. Many work on flexible schedules, contract arrangements, or per‑visit compensation models. This allows them to maximize income while minimizing burnout. By avoiding the overhead costs of private practice and the administrative burdens physicians face, visiting nurses can channel more of their earnings directly into savings and investments.

When combined with lower debt and earlier career starts, these income streams can compound into significant retirement wealth.

💰 Highest-Paying Nursing Careers (2025)

  • Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) – ~$212,000 annually
  • Nurse Practitioner (NP) – $120,000–$140,000+ depending on specialty (Family, Acute Care, Psychiatric)
  • Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) – $120,000–$135,000
  • Nurse Midwife – ~$115,000
  • Nurse Manager/Administrator – $110,000–$120,000
  • Informatics Nurse Specialist – ~$115,000
  • Neonatal ICU Nurse (NICU) – $110,000+
  • ICU Nurse – $105,000+
  • Pain Management Nurse – ~$104,000
  • Oncology Nurse – ~$100,000

***

***

The Baylor Pay Plan Advantage

The Baylor plan, a structured pay program used by some hospitals, allows nurses to work full‑time hours compressed into fewer days—often weekends—while still receiving full‑time pay and benefits. This arrangement provides several financial advantages. First, it enables nurses to earn competitive wages while freeing up weekdays for additional work, education, or entrepreneurial ventures. Second, it reduces commuting and childcare costs, allowing more income to be saved. Third, the plan often includes robust retirement benefits, such as employer‑matched contributions to 401(k) or pension programs.

Nurses who consistently participate in such structured pay plans can accumulate substantial nest eggs, often surpassing physicians who delay retirement savings due to debt repayment or lifestyle inflation. The Baylor plan highlights the importance of systematic investing: by automating contributions and focusing on long‑term growth, nurses can harness the power of compound interest. A nurse who invests steadily for 35 years may accumulate more wealth than a physician who begins saving late and inconsistently, despite earning a higher salary.

Lifestyle and Work‑Life Balance

Another overlooked factor is lifestyle. Physicians often face grueling schedules, high stress, and the temptation to maintain expensive lifestyles commensurate with their social status. Luxury homes, cars, and vacations can erode their financial base. Nurses, while not immune to lifestyle inflation, often maintain more modest spending habits.

Visiting nurses, in particular, enjoy flexibility that allows them to balance work with personal life. This reduces burnout and healthcare costs while enabling consistent employment into later years. By living within their means and prioritizing savings, nurses can accumulate wealth steadily without the financial pitfalls that sometimes accompany physician lifestyles.

Retirement Wealth Beyond Salary

Retirement wealth is not solely determined by annual income. It is shaped by debt management, savings discipline, investment strategies, and lifestyle choices. Nurses who leverage high‑paying specialties like anesthesia, flexible arrangements like visiting nursing, and structured programs like the Baylor plan can outperform physicians in these areas.

Consider two professionals: a physician earning $250,000 annually but burdened by $200,000 in debt and high living expenses, and a CRNA earning $200,000 with minimal debt and disciplined savings. Over decades, the CRNA may accumulate more net wealth, retire earlier, and enjoy greater financial security.

Conclusion

The assumption that physicians always retire richer than nurses is outdated. While physicians command higher salaries, their delayed earnings, heavy debt, and lifestyle pressures often undermine long‑term wealth. Nurses, particularly CRNAs, visiting nurses, and those who participate in structured pay programs like the Baylor plan, can retire wealthier by combining lower debt, earlier savings, competitive incomes, and disciplined financial planning.

Ultimately, retirement wealth is not about prestige but about strategy. Nurses who recognize this truth and act accordingly may find themselves enjoying more financial freedom than the very physicians they once assisted.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, LifeStyle, Marcinko Associates, Retirement and Benefits | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

SINGULARITY: In Finance and Investing

Posted on November 11, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

The singularity promises to revolutionize medicine by accelerating diagnostics, treatment, and longevity—but it also demands ethical vigilance and systemic transformation.

The concept of the technological singularity refers to a hypothetical future moment when artificial intelligence (AI) surpasses human intelligence, triggering exponential advances in technology. In medicine, this could mark a turning point where AI-driven systems outperform human clinicians in diagnosis, treatment planning, and even biomedical research. While the singularity remains speculative, its implications for healthcare are profound and multifaceted.

One of the most promising impacts is in diagnostics and precision medicine. AI systems trained on vast datasets of medical images, genetic profiles, and patient histories could detect diseases earlier and more accurately than human doctors. For example, algorithms already outperform radiologists in identifying certain cancers from imaging scans. As we approach the singularity, these systems may evolve into autonomous diagnostic agents capable of real-time analysis and personalized recommendations, tailored to each patient’s unique biology.

Another transformative area is drug discovery and development. Traditional pharmaceutical research is slow and costly, often taking over a decade to bring a new drug to market. AI could dramatically shorten this timeline by simulating molecular interactions, predicting therapeutic targets, and optimizing clinical trial designs. With superintelligent systems, the pace of innovation could accelerate to the point where treatments for currently incurable diseases—like Alzheimer’s or certain cancers—become feasible within months.

The singularity also opens doors to radical longevity and human enhancement. Advances in nanotechnology, genomics, and regenerative medicine may converge to extend human lifespan significantly. AI could help decode the aging process, identify biomarkers of cellular decline, and engineer interventions that slow or reverse it. Some theorists even envision a future where aging is treated as a curable condition, and mortality becomes a choice rather than a biological inevitability.

However, these breakthroughs come with serious ethical and societal challenges. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and access inequality are critical concerns. If singularity-level AI is controlled by a few corporations or governments, it could exacerbate global health disparities. Moreover, the replacement of human clinicians with machines raises questions about empathy, trust, and accountability in care. Who is responsible when an AI makes a life-altering mistake?

To navigate this future responsibly, medicine must embrace interdisciplinary collaboration. Ethicists, technologists, clinicians, and policymakers must work together to ensure that AI systems are transparent, equitable, and aligned with human values. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to keep pace with innovation, and medical education must prepare practitioners to work alongside intelligent machines.

In conclusion, the singularity represents both a promise and a peril for medicine. It offers unprecedented opportunities to enhance human health, but also demands careful stewardship to avoid unintended consequences.

As we edge closer to this horizon, the challenge will be not just technological, but deeply human: to harness intelligence beyond our own in service of healing, compassion, and justice.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit a RFP for speaking engagements: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Drugs and Pharma, Ethics, finance, Investing, Portfolio Management, Research & Development, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

BAD MONEY MOVES of Physicians!

Posted on November 11, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Money is a powerful tool. It can provide security, open opportunities, and help build a fulfilling life. Yet, when mismanaged, it can quickly become a source of stress and regret. Understanding the worst ways to use money is essential for anyone who wants to avoid financial pitfalls and build lasting stability.

1. Impulse Spending

One of the most damaging habits is spending without thought. Buying items on impulse—whether it’s clothes, gadgets, or luxury goods—often leads to regret and wasted resources. These purchases rarely align with long‑term goals and can drain savings meant for emergencies or investments.

2. High‑Interest Debt

Credit cards and payday loans can trap people in cycles of debt. Paying 20% or more in interest means that even small purchases balloon into massive financial burdens. Using debt irresponsibly is one of the fastest ways to erode wealth.

3. Ignoring Savings and Investments

Failing to save for the future is another critical mistake. Without an emergency fund, unexpected expenses like medical bills or car repairs can derail financial stability. Similarly, neglecting investments means missing out on compound growth that builds wealth over time.

4. Chasing Get‑Rich‑Quick Schemes

From pyramid schemes to speculative “hot tips,” chasing unrealistic returns is a recipe for disaster. These schemes prey on greed and impatience, often leaving participants with nothing but losses. Sustainable wealth comes from patience and discipline, not shortcuts.

5. Overspending on Status

Many people waste money trying to impress others—buying luxury cars, designer clothes, or extravagant experiences they cannot afford. This pursuit of status often leads to debt and financial insecurity, while providing only fleeting satisfaction.

6. Neglecting Insurance

Skipping health, auto, or home insurance to save money may seem smart in the short term, but it can be catastrophic when disaster strikes. Without protection, one accident or emergency can wipe out years of savings.

7. Failing to Budget

Living without a plan is like sailing without a map. Without a budget, it’s easy to overspend, miss bills, or fail to allocate money toward goals. Budgeting is not restrictive—it’s empowering, because it ensures money is used intentionally.

8. Ignoring Education and Skills

Spending money without investing in personal growth is another hidden mistake. Education, training, and skill development often yield lifelong returns. Neglecting these opportunities can limit earning potential and financial independence.

Conclusion

The worst things to do with money often stem from short‑term thinking, lack of discipline, or the desire for instant gratification. Impulse spending, high‑interest debt, chasing schemes, and neglecting savings all undermine financial health. By avoiding these traps and focusing on budgeting, investing wisely, and protecting against risks, money can serve as a foundation for security and freedom rather than a source of stress.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like, Refer and Subscribe

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", "Doctors Only", economics, Ethics, finance, Financial Planning, Insurance Matters, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

TAX: Difference Between Evasion and Avoidance

Posted on November 10, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Taxation is a cornerstone of modern governance, providing the financial resources necessary for governments to deliver public services, maintain infrastructure, and support social programs. While paying taxes is a legal obligation, individuals and businesses often seek ways to reduce their tax burden. This pursuit gives rise to two distinct concepts: tax avoidance and tax evasion. Though they may sound similar, the difference between them is profound, hinging on legality, ethics, and consequences.

Tax avoidance refers to the use of lawful strategies to minimize tax liability. It involves taking advantage of deductions, exemptions, credits, and other provisions explicitly allowed by tax laws. For example, individuals may contribute to retirement accounts, claim mortgage interest deductions, or invest in tax-free municipal bonds. Businesses may structure operations to benefit from tax incentives or credits designed to encourage innovation, sustainability, or job creation. In essence, tax avoidance is legal tax planning—a way to reduce obligations while staying within the boundaries of the law.

***

***

By contrast, tax evasion is illegal. It involves deliberately misrepresenting or concealing information to avoid paying taxes. Common forms of evasion include underreporting income, overstating deductions, hiding assets offshore, or falsifying records. Unlike avoidance, which is permitted and often encouraged, evasion constitutes fraud against the government. The consequences are severe: individuals and corporations found guilty of tax evasion may face hefty fines, penalties, and even imprisonment.

The distinction between the two lies in compliance versus deception. Tax avoidance complies with the letter of the law, even if it sometimes exploits loopholes. Tax evasion, however, breaks the law outright. This difference is critical not only legally but also ethically. While avoidance is lawful, aggressive avoidance strategies—especially by wealthy individuals or multinational corporations—can raise moral questions. Critics argue that such practices undermine fairness, shifting the tax burden onto ordinary citizens. Governments often respond by reforming tax codes to close loopholes and ensure equity.

Tax evasion, on the other hand, is universally condemned. It erodes trust in the tax system, deprives governments of essential revenue, and places greater strain on compliant taxpayers. Moreover, evasion can damage reputations, leading to loss of credibility and public backlash for businesses or individuals caught engaging in fraudulent practices.

In summary, tax avoidance is legal and strategic, while tax evasion is illegal and punishable. Both aim to reduce tax liability, but they differ fundamentally in method and consequence. Avoidance leverages lawful opportunities provided by tax codes, whereas evasion relies on deception and concealment. Understanding this distinction is vital for taxpayers, as crossing the line from avoidance into evasion can result in serious legal and financial repercussions. Ultimately, responsible tax planning requires not only knowledge of the law but also an awareness of ethical considerations, ensuring that efforts to minimize taxes do not compromise legality or fairness.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, Taxation, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

DI-WORSIFICATION: Stock Portfolio Pitfalls

Posted on November 8, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Diworsification is a term coined by Peter Lynch to describe when investors over‑diversify their portfolios, adding too many holdings and ultimately reducing returns instead of improving them.

Diversification has long been heralded as one of the cornerstones of sound investing. By spreading capital across different asset classes, industries, and geographies, investors can reduce risk and protect themselves against the volatility of individual securities. Yet, as with many strategies, there exists a point where the benefits diminish and the practice becomes counterproductive. This phenomenon, known as diworsification, was popularized by legendary investor Peter Lynch to describe the tendency of investors and corporations to dilute their strengths by expanding too broadly.

At its core, diworsification occurs when the pursuit of safety leads to excessive complexity. For individual investors, this often manifests in portfolios bloated with dozens or even hundreds of stocks, mutual funds, or exchange‑traded funds. While the intention is to minimize risk, the result is frequently a portfolio that mirrors the market index but with higher costs and less focus. Instead of achieving superior returns, the investor ends up with average performance weighed down by management fees, trading expenses, and the difficulty of monitoring so many positions. In essence, the investor has sacrificed the potential for meaningful gains in exchange for a false sense of security.

Corporations are not immune to this trap. In the corporate world, diworsification describes the tendency of firms to expand into unrelated businesses, diluting their competitive advantage. A company that excels in consumer electronics, for example, may attempt to branch into unrelated industries such as food services or real estate. Without the expertise, synergies, or strategic fit, these ventures often fail to deliver value, distracting management and eroding shareholder wealth. History is replete with examples of conglomerates that grew too large, too fast, only to later divest their non‑core businesses in recognition of the inefficiencies created.

The dangers of diworsification are not merely theoretical. They highlight the importance of discipline in both investing and corporate strategy. For investors, the lesson is clear: diversification should be purposeful, not indiscriminate. A well‑constructed portfolio might include a mix of equities, bonds, and alternative assets, but each holding should serve a specific role—whether it is growth, income, or risk mitigation. Beyond a certain point, adding more securities does not reduce risk meaningfully; instead, it complicates decision‑making and reduces the chance of outperforming the market.

Similarly, for corporations, strategic focus is paramount. Expansion should be guided by core competencies and long‑term vision rather than the allure of short‑term growth. Firms that resist the temptation to chase every opportunity are better positioned to strengthen their brand, innovate within their domain, and deliver sustainable value to shareholders.

In conclusion, diworsification serves as a cautionary tale against the excesses of diversification. While spreading risk is essential, overdoing it can undermine performance and clarity. Both investors and corporations must strike a balance between breadth and focus, ensuring that every addition to a portfolio or business strategy enhances rather than dilutes overall strength. In other words, “diversification means you will always have to say you’re sorry.”

True wisdom lies not in owning everything, but in owning the right things.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

RULE 3-5-7: Investor Trading Strategy

Posted on November 6, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

The 3-5-7 Rule is a trading strategy that helps investors manage risk and maximize gains by setting clear limits on losses and targets for profits. It’s a simple yet powerful framework for disciplined decision-making.

In the volatile world of trading, success often hinges not just on identifying opportunities but on managing risk with precision. The 3-5-7 Rule is a widely respected risk management strategy designed to help traders protect their capital while pursuing consistent returns. This rule provides a structured approach to trading by setting specific thresholds for risk exposure and profit expectations.

At its core, the 3-5-7 Rule breaks down into three key components:

  • 3% Risk Per Trade: Traders should never risk more than 3% of their total account value on a single trade. This limit ensures that even if a trade goes against them, the loss is manageable and doesn’t jeopardize their overall portfolio.
  • 5% Total Exposure Across All Positions: The rule advises that total exposure across all open positions should not exceed 5% of the account value. This prevents over-leveraging and reduces the impact of correlated losses during market downturns.
  • 7% Profit Target: For every trade, the goal is to achieve a profit that is at least 7% greater than the potential loss. This risk-to-reward ratio helps ensure that even with a lower win rate, traders can remain profitable over time.

The beauty of the 3-5-7 Rule lies in its simplicity and adaptability. It can be applied across various asset classes—stocks, forex, crypto—and suits both beginners and seasoned traders. By enforcing discipline, it helps traders avoid emotional decisions, such as chasing losses or holding onto losing positions too long. Moreover, this rule encourages thoughtful position sizing. Traders must calculate their entry and exit points carefully, factoring in stop-loss levels and account size. This analytical approach fosters better trade planning and reduces impulsive behavior.

Another advantage is its scalability. As a trader’s account grows, the percentages remain constant, but the dollar amounts adjust accordingly. This keeps the strategy relevant and effective regardless of portfolio size. In practice, the 3-5-7 Rule acts as a safety net. It doesn’t guarantee profits, but it significantly reduces the likelihood of catastrophic losses. It also promotes consistency, which is crucial for long-term success in trading.

In conclusion, the 3-5-7 Rule is more than just a guideline—it’s a mindset. It teaches traders to respect risk, plan strategically, and aim for favorable outcomes.

By adhering to this rule, traders can navigate the unpredictable markets with greater confidence and control.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com 

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

HIGH-FREQUENCY TRADING: Algorithmic Computerized Stock Trading

Posted on November 6, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

High-frequency trading (HFT) is a form of algorithmic trading that uses powerful computers and complex programs to execute thousands of trades in fractions of a second. It has transformed modern financial markets by increasing speed, liquidity, and efficiency—but also raised concerns about fairness and stability.

High-frequency trading emerged in the early 2000s as technological advances allowed financial firms to process market data and execute trades faster than ever before. HFT firms use sophisticated algorithms to analyze multiple markets and identify short-term opportunities. These trades are often held for mere seconds or milliseconds, and profits are made by exploiting tiny price discrepancies across assets or exchanges.

One of the defining features of HFT is its reliance on speed. Firms invest heavily in infrastructure—such as co-location services near exchange servers and fiber-optic cables—to gain microsecond advantages over competitors. This race for speed has led to a technological arms race, where milliseconds can mean millions in profit.

HFT contributes significantly to market liquidity, meaning it helps ensure that buyers and sellers can transact quickly at stable prices. By constantly placing and updating orders, HFT firms narrow bid-ask spreads and reduce transaction costs for other market participants. This has made markets more efficient and accessible, especially for retail investors.

However, HFT is not without controversy. Critics argue that it creates an uneven playing field, where firms with access to advanced technology and capital can dominate markets. Concerns about market manipulation—such as quote stuffing (flooding the market with orders to slow competitors) or spoofing (placing fake orders to move prices)—have led to increased regulatory scrutiny.

The 2010 Flash Crash is often cited as a cautionary example of HFT’s potential risks. During this event, the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged nearly 1,000 points in minutes before rebounding. Investigations revealed that automated trading systems, including HFT algorithms, contributed to the sudden loss of liquidity and extreme volatility.

Regulators have responded by implementing safeguards such as circuit breakers, which pause trading during extreme price movements, and requiring firms to register and disclose their trading strategies. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) continue to monitor HFT’s impact on market integrity.

Despite its challenges, HFT remains a dominant force in global finance. It accounts for a significant portion of trading volume in equities, futures, and foreign exchange markets. Many institutional investors rely on HFT strategies to manage large portfolios and hedge risks.

In conclusion, high-frequency trading represents both the promise and peril of technological innovation in finance. While it enhances market efficiency and liquidity, it also introduces new risks and ethical dilemmas.

As markets evolve, balancing innovation with fairness and stability will be essential to ensuring that HFT serves the broader interests of investors and the economy.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com 

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Glossary Terms, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

The Sraffa–Hayek Economic Debate

Posted on November 5, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

The Sraffa–Hayek debate stands as a pivotal moment in the history of economic thought, highlighting deep philosophical and methodological differences between two influential schools: the Austrian School, represented by Friedrich Hayek, and the neo-Ricardian or Cambridge School, represented by Piero Sraffa. Taking place primarily in the 1930s, this intellectual exchange centered on the nature of capital, the role of equilibrium, and the validity of marginalist theory.

Friedrich Hayek, a staunch advocate of Austrian economics, had developed a theory of business cycles rooted in the mis allocation of capital due to artificially low interest rates. In his framework, interest rates serve as signals that coordinate inter temporal production decisions. When central banks distort these signals, they cause over investment in capital-intensive industries, leading to unsustainable booms followed by inevitable busts. Hayek’s theory was grounded in a time-structured view of capital, emphasizing the importance of temporal coordination in production.

Piero Sraffa, a Cambridge economist and close associate of John Maynard Keynes, challenged Hayek’s assumptions in a 1932 review of Hayek’s book Prices and Production. Sraffa’s critique was both technical and philosophical. He questioned the coherence of Hayek’s notion of a uniform natural rate of interest in a complex economy with heterogeneous capital goods. Sraffa argued that in such an economy, there could be multiple natural rates of interest, making it impossible to define a single rate that equilibrates savings and investment across all sectors.

Moreover, Sraffa criticized the Austrian reliance on equilibrium analysis in a world characterized by uncertainty and institutional complexity. He contended that Hayek’s model was overly abstract and detached from real-world dynamics. This critique foreshadowed Sraffa’s later work, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (1960), which laid the foundation for the neo-Ricardian critique of marginalist economics. In that work, Sraffa demonstrated that prices and distribution could be determined without recourse to subjective utility or marginal productivity, challenging the core of neoclassical theory.

The debate had far-reaching implications. For the Austrian School, it exposed vulnerabilities in their capital theory and prompted refinements in their approach to intertemporal coordination. For the broader economics profession, Sraffa’s critique contributed to a growing skepticism about the internal consistency of marginalist value theory, influencing the Cambridge capital controversies of the 1950s and 1960s.

While the Sraffa–Hayek debate did not produce a definitive victor, it underscored the importance of foundational assumptions in economic modeling. It also highlighted the tension between abstract theoretical elegance and empirical relevance—a tension that continues to shape economic discourse today. Ultimately, the debate enriched the intellectual landscape by forcing economists to confront the limitations of their models and to grapple with the complex realities of capital, time, and uncertainty.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com 

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", economics, finance, Glossary Terms, Healthcare Finance, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

THEORY: Short Interest Investing

Posted on November 3, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Short Interest Theory suggests that high levels of short interest in a stock may actually signal a potential price increase, contrary to traditional bearish interpretations.

Short Interest Theory is a contrarian investment concept that challenges conventional wisdom in financial markets. Traditionally, a high short interest—meaning a large percentage of a company’s shares are being sold short—is seen as a bearish signal, indicating that many investors expect the stock’s price to decline. However, Short Interest Theory flips this assumption, proposing that a high short interest can actually be a bullish indicator, suggesting a potential upward price movement due to a phenomenon known as a “short squeeze.”

To understand this theory, it’s important to grasp the mechanics of short selling. When investors short a stock, they borrow shares and sell them on the open market, hoping to repurchase them later at a lower price and pocket the difference. However, if the stock price rises instead of falling, short sellers face mounting losses. To limit these losses, they may be forced to buy back the stock at higher prices, which increases demand and drives the price up even further. This chain reaction is what’s known as a short squeeze.

Short Interest Theory posits that when short interest reaches unusually high levels, the stock becomes a prime candidate for a short squeeze. Investors who follow this theory look for stocks with high short interest ratios—often measured as the number of shares sold short divided by the stock’s average daily trading volume. A high ratio suggests that it would take many days for all short sellers to cover their positions, increasing the likelihood of a rapid price surge if positive news or buying pressure emerges.

This theory gained widespread attention during the GameStop (GME) saga in early 2021. Retail investors noticed that GME had an extremely high short interest—more than 100% of its float—and began buying shares en masse. This triggered a historic short squeeze, sending the stock price soaring and forcing institutional short sellers to cover their positions at massive losses. The event served as a real-world validation of Short Interest Theory and highlighted the power of collective investor behavior in modern markets.

Despite its appeal, Short Interest Theory is not without risks. Betting on a short squeeze can be speculative and volatile. Not all heavily shorted stocks experience upward momentum; some may continue to decline if the negative sentiment is justified by poor fundamentals or weak earnings. Moreover, timing a short squeeze is notoriously difficult, and investors can suffer significant losses if the anticipated rebound fails to materialize.

In conclusion, Short Interest Theory offers a compelling contrarian perspective on market sentiment. By interpreting high short interest as a potential bullish signal, it encourages investors to look beyond surface-level indicators and consider the dynamics of market psychology and trading behavior. While it can lead to lucrative opportunities, especially in the context of short squeezes, it also demands careful analysis and risk management. As with any investment strategy, understanding the underlying fundamentals and market context is essential for making informed decisions.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Practice Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

LIFE CYCLE HYPOTHESIS: A Framework for Financial Behavior

Posted on November 2, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

The Life Cycle Hypothesis (LCH) is a foundational theory in economics and personal finance that explains how individuals plan their consumption and savings behavior over the course of their lives. Developed in the 1950s by economists Franco Modigliani and Richard Brumberg, the LCH posits that people aim to smooth their consumption throughout their lifetime, regardless of fluctuations in income. This theory has had a profound impact on how economists, financial planners, and policymakers understand saving patterns, retirement planning, and fiscal policy.

At its core, the LCH assumes that individuals are forward-looking and rational. They anticipate changes in income—such as those caused by retirement, unemployment, or career progression—and adjust their saving and spending accordingly. During high-income periods, typically in mid-career, individuals save more to prepare for low-income phases, such as retirement. Conversely, in early adulthood and old age, when income is lower, individuals are expected to dissave, or spend from their accumulated savings.

One of the key insights of the LCH is that consumption is not directly tied to current income but rather to expected lifetime income. This means that temporary changes in income should not significantly affect consumption patterns, as individuals base their spending decisions on long-term expectations. For example, a young professional may take out a loan to buy a car, anticipating higher future earnings that will allow them to repay the debt without drastically altering their lifestyle.

The LCH also provides a framework for understanding the role of pensions, social security, and other retirement savings mechanisms. By recognizing that individuals need to save during their working years to maintain consumption levels in retirement, the theory supports the development of policies that encourage long-term savings and financial literacy. It also helps explain why some people may under-save or over-consume if they misjudge their future income or lack access to financial planning resources.

Despite its elegance, the Life Cycle Hypothesis has faced criticism and refinement. Behavioral economists argue that individuals are not always rational and may struggle with self-control, procrastination, or lack of financial knowledge. These limitations have led to the development of the Behavioral Life Cycle Hypothesis, which incorporates psychological factors such as mental accounting and framing effects. Moreover, empirical studies have shown that many people do not smooth consumption as predicted, often due to liquidity constraints, uncertainty, or cultural influences.

Nevertheless, the LCH remains a powerful tool for analyzing financial behavior across different stages of life. It has influenced retirement planning strategies, tax policy, and the design of financial products. By emphasizing the importance of long-term planning and the intertemporal nature of financial decisions, the Life Cycle Hypothesis continues to shape how individuals and institutions approach economic well-being.

In conclusion, the Life Cycle Hypothesis offers a compelling lens through which to view personal finance. While it may not capture every nuance of human behavior, its emphasis on lifetime income and consumption smoothing provides a valuable foundation for understanding and improving financial decision-making.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", economics, Ethics, finance, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

The Hidden Risk of Trusting Friends in Finance

Posted on November 2, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Here’s a risk to your financial health that may surprise you!

Rick Kahler MS CFP

By Rick Kahler CFP™

There are two reasons for this.

First, we tend to trust and rely on people we know.

Second, research finds that humans have a deep-seated desire to meet the needs of others, so “helping” a relative or friend get started in their financial sales career is just human nature. Unfortunately, brokerage and insurance companies know this. They train their new agents that the easiest sales to make when getting started are to relatives and friends.

Any time I find an ill-advised financial product a client has purchased from a relative or friend, I cringe, anticipating the client’s resistance to canceling it. Regardless of how bad the advice was or how outrageous the fees of an investment product may be, the deeper the relationship the more difficulty there will be in changing course.

***

***

Here’s a typical example 

Jim and Sofia, two young professionals, married at around the same time Jim’s uncle went to work for a financial services company. The uncle sold Jim a $250,000 Variable Universal Life (VUL) policy with a $500 monthly premium. Jim and Sofia were happy, thinking they had made a prudent choice to start saving for retirement and help out a relative at the same time.

When Sofia became pregnant, the couple decided to engage a fee-only financial planner. She found they were under insured to provide for a family and also that the VUL policy was incredibly expensive and ill-advised for their needs. She recommended canceling the VUL policy with its $500 monthly premium, instead paying $300 monthly for two $1 million term life insurance policies and putting $200 a month into a tax-free Roth IRA.

Sofia and Jim told this to their uncle, who was “shocked” at the planner’s “poor advice.”

He contended that any competent financial planner would know a person needs permanent insurance as a foundation to “raise their child in the case of a premature death, fund their retirement, pay estate taxes and just like a Roth, it is tax free.”
Sadly, the uncle was unwilling to admit that $250,000 of insurance wouldn’t be enough to raise their child, fund their retirement, and pay estate taxes; nor was it truly tax free. He also didn’t mention that he had a vested interest in their keeping the policy. While he probably earned 55% to 100% of the first year’s commission, it is common practice that an agent will also receive 10-15% of the annual premium from years 2-10.

***

***

Sofia and Jim agreed with the financial planner’s recommendation. They could see the sense in having $1 million of insurance on each of them instead of $250,000 on just Jim for almost half the price, plus the tax-free growth of $200 a month in the Roth IRA.

Yet they didn’t follow the planner’s advice, because they didn’t want to upset their uncle. They chose to weaken their financial health, plus risk the well-being of their family if one of them died prematurely, in order to enrich their uncle for fear of offending him.

This happens more frequently than you would think. And it isn’t limited to life insurance. I’ve seen clients invest in a variety of “opportunities,” based on advice from a family member, that were not in their best interest.

Assessment

Next time a friend or family member offers to sell you a financial product or give you some great advice, you may want to do yourself a favor and decline. If you really want to help them out, invite them over for dinner.

Conclusion
Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, urls and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements.

Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Experts Invited, Financial Planning, Insurance Matters, Investing | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

MEDICAL SCHOOLS: What They Do Not Teach About Money!

Posted on October 26, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

WARNING! WARNING! All DOCTORS

What Medical School Didn’t Teach Doctors About Money

Medical school is designed to mold students into competent, compassionate physicians. It teaches anatomy, pathology, pharmacology, and clinical skills with precision and rigor. Yet, despite the depth of medical knowledge imparted, one critical area is often overlooked: financial literacy. For many doctors, the transition from student to professional comes with a steep learning curve—not in medicine, but in money. From managing debt to understanding taxes, investing, and retirement planning, medical school leaves a financial education gap that can have long-term consequences.

The Debt Dilemma

One of the most glaring omissions in medical education is how to manage student loan debt. The average medical student graduates with over $200,000 in debt, yet few are taught how to navigate repayment options, interest accrual, or loan forgiveness programs. Many doctors enter residency with little understanding of income-driven repayment plans or Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), missing opportunities to reduce their financial burden. Without guidance, some make costly mistakes—such as refinancing federal loans prematurely or choosing repayment plans that don’t align with their career trajectory.

Income ≠ Wealth

Medical students often assume that a high salary will automatically lead to financial security. While physicians do earn more than most professionals, income alone doesn’t guarantee wealth. Medical school rarely addresses the importance of budgeting, saving, and investing. As a result, many doctors fall into the “HENRY” trap—High Earner, Not Rich Yet. They spend lavishly, assuming their income will always cover expenses, only to find themselves living paycheck to paycheck. Without a solid financial foundation, even high earners can struggle to build net worth.

***

***

Taxes and Business Skills

Doctors are also unprepared for the complexities of taxes. Whether employed by a hospital or running a private practice, physicians face unique tax challenges. Medical school doesn’t teach how to track deductible expenses, optimize retirement contributions, or navigate self-employment taxes. For those who open their own clinics, the lack of business education is even more pronounced. Understanding profit margins, payroll, insurance billing, and compliance regulations is essential—but rarely covered in medical training.

Investing and Retirement Planning

Another blind spot is investing. Medical students are rarely taught the basics of compound interest, asset allocation, or retirement accounts. Many don’t know the difference between a Roth IRA and a traditional 401(k), or how to evaluate mutual funds and index funds. This lack of knowledge delays retirement planning and can lead to missed opportunities for long-term growth. Some doctors rely on financial advisors without understanding the fees or conflicts of interest involved, putting their wealth at risk.

Insurance and Risk Management

Medical school also fails to educate students on insurance—life, disability, malpractice, and health. Doctors need robust coverage to protect their income and assets, but many don’t know how to evaluate policies or understand terms like “own occupation” or “elimination period.” Inadequate coverage can leave physicians vulnerable to financial disaster in the event of illness, injury, or litigation.

Emotional and Behavioral Finance

Beyond technical knowledge, medical school overlooks the emotional side of money. Physicians often face pressure to maintain a certain lifestyle, especially after years of sacrifice. The desire to “catch up” can lead to impulsive spending, luxury purchases, and financial stress. Without tools to manage money mindset and behavioral habits, doctors may struggle with guilt, anxiety, or burnout related to finances.

The Case for Financial Education

Fortunately, awareness of this gap is growing. Organizations like Medics’ Money and podcasts such as “Docs Outside the Box” are working to fill the void by offering financial education tailored to physicians.

These resources cover everything from budgeting and debt management to investing and entrepreneurship. Some medical schools are beginning to incorporate financial literacy into their curricula, but progress is slow and inconsistent.

Conclusion

Medical school equips doctors to save lives, but it doesn’t prepare them to secure their own financial future. The lack of financial education leaves many physicians vulnerable to debt, poor investment decisions, and lifestyle inflation. To thrive both professionally and personally, doctors must seek out financial knowledge beyond the classroom. Whether through self-study, mentorship, or professional guidance, understanding money is as essential as understanding medicine. After all, financial health is a cornerstone of overall well-being—and every doctor deserves to master both.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Healthcare Finance, Insurance Matters, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management, Retirement and Benefits, Risk Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

INVESTING: Rules of Thumb

Posted on October 22, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

Portfolio Allocation & Risk Management

🏦 100 Minus Age Rule: Subtract your age from 100 to estimate the percentage of your portfolio to invest in stocks. The rest goes to bonds or safer assets.

  • Rule of 110 or 120: A modern twist—subtract your age from 110 or 120 to allow for more stock exposure in a low-interest environment.
  • Diversify, Don’t Speculate: Spread investments across asset classes to reduce risk.
  • Don’t Invest What You Can’t Afford to Lose: Especially for speculative assets like crypto or startups.

📈 Growth & Returns

  • Rule of 72: Divide 72 by your annual return rate to estimate how many years it takes to double your money.
  • Time in the Market Beats Timing the Market: Staying invested long-term usually outperforms trying to predict short-term moves.
  • Start Early, Compound Often: The earlier you invest, the more compound interest works in your favor.

🧾 Budgeting & Saving

  • 50/30/20 Rule: Allocate 50% of income to needs, 30% to wants, and 20% to savings/investments.
  • Emergency Fund Rule: Save 3–6 months of living expenses before investing aggressively.
  • Pay Yourself First: Automatically invest a portion of your income before spending.

🧠 Behavioral & Strategy Tips

  • Buy What You Understand: Don’t invest in companies or assets you don’t comprehend.
  • Avoid Emotional Decisions: Fear and greed are the enemies of smart investing.
  • Rebalance Annually: Adjust your portfolio to maintain your target asset allocation.
  • Don’t Chase Past Performance: What worked last year may not work this year.

🏦 Retirement & Withdrawal

  • The 4% Rule: Withdraw 4% of your retirement savings annually to make it last ~30 years.
  • Save 15% of Income for Retirement: A common target for long-term financial security.
  • Max Out Tax-Advantaged Accounts First: Prioritize 401(k), IRA, or Roth IRA before taxable accounts.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Taxation, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Essential Investing Tips for New Physicians

Posted on October 21, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

HOW TO COMMENCE THE FINE ART OF MONEY

***

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Investing may seem complicated, but today there are many ways for the newly minted physician [MD, DO, DPM, DMD or DDS] to begin, even with minimal knowledge and only a small amount to invest. Starting as soon as possible will help you get closer to the retirement you deserve.

***

Why is investing important?

Investing often feels like a luxury reserved for the already wealthy physician. Many of us find it difficult to think about investing for the future when there are so many things we need that money for right now; medical school loans, auto, home and children; etc. But, at some point, we’re going to want to stop working and enjoy retirement. And simply put, retirement is expensive.

Most calculations advise that you aim for enough savings to give you 70% to 80% of your pre-retirement income for 20 years or more. Depending on your goals for retirement, that means you could need between $500,000 and $1 million in savings by the time you retire. That may not sound attainable, but with the power of compounding growth, it’s not as hard to achieve as you think. The key is starting as soon as possible and making smart choices.

INVESTMENT TYPES: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/08/26/

When should you start investing?

The short answer is “now,” no matter what your age. Due to the way the gains in investments can compound, the earlier you start the better. Money invested in your 20s could very easily grow over 20 times before you retire, without you having to do much. That is powerful. Even if you’re in your 50s or older, you can still make significant progress toward meeting your goals in retirement.

How much should you invest per month?

Most financial experts say you should invest 10% to 15% of your annual income for retirement. That’s the goal, but you don’t have to get there immediately. Whatever you can start investing today is going to help you down the road.

So, if 10% to 15% is too much right now, start small and build toward that goal over time. You can actually start investing with $5 if you want. And you should. Some investment products require a minimum investment, but there are plenty that don’t, and a lot of online brokerage accounts can be started for free.

BROKE DOCTORS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/08/02/doctors-going-broke-and-living-paycheck-to-paycheck/

Good beginner investments.

The best investments for you are going to depend on your age, goals, and strategy. The important thing is to get started. You’ll learn as you go. If you have questions, a dedicated DIYer or investment advisor can help give you the guidance and options you need.

ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2022/06/06/risk-aversion-and-investment-alternatives/

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Ask a Doctor, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

STOCK MARKET INDEX OPTIONS: Puts and Calls

Posted on October 21, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Understanding Stock Market Options: A Strategic Investment Tool

Stock market options are financial instruments that offer investors a versatile way to participate in the equity markets. Unlike traditional stock trading, options provide the right—but not the obligation—to buy or sell an underlying asset at a predetermined price within a specified time frame. This flexibility makes options a powerful tool for hedging, speculation, and income generation.

There are two primary types of options: calls and puts. A call option gives the holder the right to buy a stock at a specific price, known as the strike price, before the option expires. Investors typically purchase call options when they anticipate a rise in the stock’s price. Conversely, a put option grants the right to sell a stock at the strike price, and is used when an investor expects the stock to decline. Each option contract typically represents 100 shares of the underlying stock.

Options are traded on regulated exchanges such as the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), and their prices are influenced by several factors. These include the underlying stock’s price, the strike price, time until expiration, volatility, and prevailing interest rates. The premium, or cost of the option, reflects these variables and represents the maximum loss for the buyer.

***

***

One of the most compelling uses of options is hedging. Investors can use options to protect their portfolios against adverse price movements. For example, owning put options on a stock can offset potential losses if the stock’s value drops. This strategy is akin to purchasing insurance and is especially valuable during periods of market uncertainty.

Options also enable speculative strategies with limited capital. Traders can leverage options to bet on price movements without owning the underlying asset. While this can lead to significant gains, it also carries substantial risk, particularly if the market moves against the position. Therefore, understanding the mechanics and risks of options is crucial before engaging in such trades.

Another popular strategy involves writing options, or selling them to collect premiums. Covered call writing, for instance, involves holding a stock and selling call options against it. This generates income but caps potential upside if the stock surges beyond the strike price. Similarly, cash-secured puts allow investors to earn premiums while potentially acquiring stocks at a discount.

Despite their advantages, options are not suitable for all investors. Their complexity and potential for rapid loss require a solid grasp of financial concepts and disciplined risk management. Regulatory bodies and brokerages often require investors to pass suitability assessments before granting access to options trading.

In conclusion, stock market options are dynamic instruments that offer a range of strategic possibilities. Whether used for hedging, speculation, or income, they provide flexibility that traditional stock trading cannot match. However, their effective use demands education, experience, and a clear understanding of market behavior. For informed investors, options can be a valuable addition to a diversified financial toolkit.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Understanding 4 Key Financial Psychological Biases

Posted on October 19, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

The following are 4 common financial psychological biases.  Some are learned while others are genetically determined (and often socially reinforced).  While this essay focuses on the financial and investing implications of these biases, they are prevalent in most areas in life.

STOCK MARKET: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/10/13/stock-market-a-zero-sum-bias/

Loss aversion affected many investors during the stock market crash of 2007-08 or the flash crash of May 6, 2010 also known as the crash of 2:45. During the crash, many people decided they couldn’t afford to lose more and sold their investments.

Of course, this caused the investors to sell at market troughs and miss the quick, dramatic recovery.

Overconfident investing happens when we believe we can out-smart other investors via market timing or through quick, frequent trading.

Data convincingly shows that people who trade most often under-perform the market by a significant margin over time.

Mental accounting takes place when we assign different values to money depending on where we got it.

For instance, even though we may have an aggressive saving goal for the year, it is likely easier for us to save money that we worked for than money that was given to us as a gift.

Herd mentality makes it very hard for humans to not take action when everyone around us does.

For example, we may hear stories of people making significant profits buying, fixing up, and flipping homes and have the desire to get in on the action, even though we have no experience in real estate.

CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource/Title/0826102549

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Thank You

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", "Doctors Only", Accounting, Alternative Investments, Career Development, Ethics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

What is the S&P 500 Stock Index?

Posted on October 15, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

The S&P 500, short for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, is one of the most widely followed stock market indices in the world. It tracks the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States, offering a broad snapshot of the overall health and direction of the U.S. economy. Created in 1957 by the financial services company Standard & Poor’s, the index has become a benchmark for investors, analysts, and economists alike.

Composition and Criteria The S&P 500 includes companies from a wide range of industries, such as technology, healthcare, finance, energy, and consumer goods. To be included in the index, a company must meet specific criteria: it must be based in the U.S., have a market capitalization of at least $14.5 billion (as of 2025), be highly liquid, and have a public float of at least 50% of its shares. Additionally, the company must have positive earnings in the most recent quarter and over the sum of its most recent four quarters.

Some of the most recognizable names in the S&P 500 include Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan Chase, and ExxonMobil. These companies are selected by a committee that reviews eligibility and ensures the index remains representative of the broader market.

How It Works The S&P 500 is a market-capitalization-weighted index, meaning that companies with larger market values have a greater influence on the index’s performance. For example, a significant movement in Apple’s stock price will affect the index more than a similar movement in a smaller company’s stock. This weighting system helps reflect the real impact of large corporations on the economy.

The index is updated in real time during trading hours and is used by investors to gauge market trends. It also serves as the basis for many investment products, such as mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which aim to replicate its performance.

VIX: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/10/12/vix-the-stock-market-fear-gauge/

Why It Matters The S&P 500 is considered a leading indicator of U.S. equity markets and the economy as a whole. When the index rises, it often signals investor confidence and economic growth. Conversely, a decline may indicate uncertainty or economic slowdown. Because it includes companies from diverse sectors, the S&P 500 provides a more balanced view than narrower indices like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which only tracks 30 companies.

Investment and Strategy Many investors use the S&P 500 as a benchmark to measure the performance of their portfolios. Passive investment strategies, such as index funds, aim to match the returns of the S&P 500 rather than beat it. This approach has gained popularity due to its low fees and consistent long-term performance.

In summary, the S&P 500 is more than just a number—it’s a powerful tool that reflects the pulse of the American economy. By tracking the performance of 500 major companies, it offers insights into market trends, investor sentiment, and economic health. Whether you’re a seasoned investor or just starting out, understanding the S&P 500 is essential to navigating the world of finance.

VIX Today: 20.81USD▲ +1.78 (+9.35%) today

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, economics, finance, Glossary Terms, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

OCTOBER: The 2025 Stock Market Crash

Posted on October 13, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

The October 2025 Stock Market Crash: A Perfect Storm of Geopolitics and Investor Panic

The weekend of October 10–12, 2025, marked one of the most dramatic downturns in global financial markets in recent memory. What began as a series of unsettling headlines quickly snowballed into a full-blown market crash, sending shockwaves through economies and portfolios worldwide. This event was not the result of a single catalyst but rather a convergence of geopolitical tensions, speculative excess, and investor psychology.

At the heart of the crisis was a sudden escalation in U.S.–China trade relations. President Donald Trump abruptly canceled a scheduled diplomatic meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping and announced a sweeping 100% tariff on all Chinese imports. This move reignited fears of a prolonged trade war, reminiscent of the economic standoff that rattled markets in the late 2010s. Investors, already jittery from months of uncertainty, interpreted the announcement as a signal of deteriorating global cooperation and retaliatory economic measures to come.

VIX: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/10/12/vix-the-stock-market-fear-gauge/

The impact was immediate and severe. Major U.S. indices plummeted: the S&P 500 dropped 2.7%, the Nasdaq fell 3.6%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 1.9%. These declines marked the worst single-day performance since April and triggered automatic trading halts in several sectors. The selloff was not confined to the United States; European and Asian markets mirrored the panic, with steep losses across the board.

Compounding the crisis was a massive liquidation in the cryptocurrency market. As traditional assets tumbled, investors rushed to offload digital holdings, leading to the largest crypto wipeout in history. Trillions of dollars in value evaporated within hours, further destabilizing investor confidence and draining liquidity from the broader financial system.

Another underlying factor was growing concern over the valuation of artificial intelligence (AI) stocks. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) had recently issued a warning that the AI sector was exhibiting signs of a speculative bubble, drawing parallels to the dot-com era. With many AI companies trading at astronomical price-to-earnings ratios, the crash exposed the fragility of investor sentiment and the dangers of overexuberance in emerging technologies.

Perhaps most telling was the psychological shift among investors. The weekend saw widespread capitulation, with many choosing to exit the market entirely rather than weather further volatility. This behavior—marked by fear-driven decision-making and herd mentality—is often a hallmark of deeper financial crises. It underscores the importance of trust and stability in maintaining market equilibrium.

Abbvie: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/09/04/abbvie-the-economic-recession/

In conclusion, the October 2025 stock market crash was a multifaceted event driven by geopolitical shocks, speculative risk, and emotional contagion. It serves as a stark reminder of how interconnected and fragile global markets have become. As policymakers and investors assess the damage, the focus must shift toward restoring confidence, recalibrating risk, and ensuring that future growth is built on sustainable foundations rather than speculative fervor.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

SPEAKING: ME-P Editor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", economics, Financial Planning, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

What is the Dow Jones Industrial Average?

Posted on October 10, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

DEFINED

By A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), often referred to simply as “the Dow,” is one of the oldest and most well-known stock market indices in the world. It was created in 1896 by Charles Dow, the co-founder of The Wall Street Journal, and is designed to represent the performance of the broader U.S. stock market, specifically focusing on 30 large, publicly traded companies. These companies are considered leaders in their respective industries and serve as a barometer for the overall health of the U.S. economy.

The Composition of the DJIA

The DJIA includes 30 companies, which are selected by the editors of The Wall Street Journal based on various factors such as market influence, reputation, and the stability of the company. These companies represent a wide array of sectors, including technology, finance, healthcare, consumer goods, and energy. Notably, the companies chosen for the DJIA are not necessarily the largest companies in the U.S. by market capitalization, but rather those that are most indicative of the broader economy. Some of the prominent companies listed in the DJIA include names like Apple, Microsoft, Coca-Cola, and Johnson & Johnson.

However, the list of 30 companies is not static. Over time, companies may be added or removed to reflect changes in the economic landscape. For example, if a company experiences significant decline or no longer represents a leading sector, it might be replaced with another company that better reflects modern economic trends. This periodic reshuffling ensures that the DJIA continues to be a relevant measure of economic activity.

How the DJIA is Calculated

The DJIA is a price-weighted index, which means that the value of the index is determined by the share price of the component companies, rather than their market capitalization. To calculate the DJIA, the sum of the stock prices of all 30 companies is divided by a special divisor. This divisor adjusts for stock splits, dividends, and other corporate actions to maintain the integrity of the index over time. The price-weighted method means that higher-priced stocks have a greater impact on the movement of the index, regardless of the overall size or economic weight of the company.

For instance, if a company with a higher stock price like Apple experiences a significant change in value, it will influence the DJIA more than a company with a lower stock price, even if the latter has a larger market capitalization. This makes the DJIA somewhat different from other indices, like the S&P 500, which is weighted by market cap and gives more weight to larger companies in terms of their economic impact.

Significance of the DJIA

The DJIA is widely regarded as a barometer of the U.S. stock market’s performance. Investors and analysts closely monitor the movements of the Dow to gauge the overall health of the economy. When the DJIA rises, it generally suggests that investors are optimistic about the economic outlook and that large companies are performing well. Conversely, when the DJIA falls, it often signals economic uncertainty or a downturn in market conditions.

Despite being a narrow index, with only 30 companies, the DJIA holds substantial sway in financial markets. It is widely covered in the media and is often cited in discussions about the state of the economy. In fact, the performance of the DJIA is considered a key indicator of investor sentiment and economic confidence.

However, the DJIA has its limitations. Since it only includes 30 companies, it does not necessarily represent the broader market or capture the performance of smaller companies. Other indices, like the S&P 500, which includes 500 companies, offer a more comprehensive view of the market’s performance.

Conclusion

The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a key metric for understanding the state of the U.S. economy and the stock market. Although it has evolved over the years, it continues to provide valuable insights into the performance of large, influential companies. While it is not a perfect reflection of the market as a whole, the DJIA remains one of the most important and widely recognized indices in global finance. Through its historical significance and its role in shaping market sentiment, the Dow has cemented its place as a cornerstone of financial analysis.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: economics, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, iMBA, Inc., Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Understanding Behavioral Finance Paradoxes

Posted on October 9, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

 “THE INVESTOR’S CHIEF problem—even his worst enemy—is likely to be himself.” So wrote Benjamin Graham, the father of modern investment analysis.

With these words, written in 1949, Graham acknowledged the reality that investors are human. Though he had written an 800 page book on techniques to analyze stocks and bonds, Graham understood that investing is as much about human psychology as it is about numerical analysis.

In the decades since Graham’s passing, an entire field has emerged at the intersection of psychology and finance. Known as behavioral finance, its pioneers include Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky and Richard Thaler. Together, they and their peers have identified countless human foibles that interfere with our ability to make good financial decisions. These include hindsight bias, recency bias and overconfidence, among others. On my bookshelf, I have at least as many volumes on behavioral finance as I do on pure financial analysis, so I certainly put stock in these ideas.

At the same time, I think we’re being too hard on ourselves when we lay all of these biases at our feet. We shouldn’t conclude that we’re deficient because we’re so susceptible to biases. Rather, the problem is that finance isn’t a scientific field like math or physics. At best, it’s like chaos theory. Yes, there is some underlying logic, but it’s usually so hard to observe and understand that it might as well be random. The world of personal finance is bedeviled by paradoxes, so no individual—no matter how rational—can always make optimal decisions.

As we plan for our financial future, I think it’s helpful to be cognizant of these paradoxes. While there’s nothing we can do to control or change them, there is great value in being aware of them, so we can approach them with the right tools and the right mindset.

Here are just seven of the paradoxes that can bedevil financial decision-making:

  1. There’s the paradox that all of the greatest fortunes—Carnegie, Rockefeller, Buffett, Gates—have been made by owning just one stock. And yet the best advice for individual investors is to do the opposite: to own broadly diversified index funds.
  2. There’s the paradox that the stock market may appear overvalued and yet it could become even more overvalued before it eventually declines. And when it does decline, it may be to a level that is even higher than where it is today.
  3. There’s the paradox that we make plans based on our understanding of the rules—and yet Congress can change the rules on us at any time, as it did just last year.
  4. There’s the paradox that we base our plans on historical averages—average stock market returns, average interest rates, average inflation rates and so on—and yet we only lead one life, so none of us will experience the average.
  5. There’s the paradox that we continue to be attracted to the prestige of high-cost colleges, even though a rational analysis that looks at return on investment tells us that lower-cost state schools are usually the better bet.
  6. There’s the paradox that early retirement seems so appealing—and has even turned into a movement—and yet the reality of early retirement suggests that we might be better off staying at our desks.
  7. There’s the paradox that retirees’ worst fear is outliving their money and yet few choose the financial product that is purpose-built to solve that problem: the single-premium immediate annuity.

How should you respond to these paradoxes? As you plan for your financial future, embrace the concept of “loosely held views.”

In other words, make financial plans, but continuously update your views, question your assumptions and rethink your priorities.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Subscribe, Refer and Like

***

https://www.amazon.com/Comprehensive-Financial-Planning-Strategies-Advisors/dp/1482240289/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1418580820&sr=8-1&keywords=david+marcinko

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Taxation, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Understanding Population Health: Trends and Impacts

Posted on October 6, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

A Different Perspective on Population Health

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP®

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Definition

Population health has been defined as “the health outcomes of a group of individuals, including the distribution of such outcomes within the group”. It is an approach to health that aims to improve the health of an entire human population or cohort. http://www.HealthDictionarySeries.org

History

In fact, the nominal “father of population health” is colleague and Dean David B. Nash MD MBA of Jefferson Medical School in Philadelphia. And, although I attended Temple University down the street, David still wrote the Foreword to my textbook years later; Financial Management Strategies for Hospitals and Healthcare Organizations [Tools, Techniques, Checklists and Case Studies].

Factors

Now age, income, location, race, gender  and education are just a few characteristics that differentiate the world’s population. These are called ”disparities” and they have a major impact on people’s lives; especially their healthcare. And, I’ve written about them before.  Perform a ME-P “search” for more.

So, it’s only natural that we’re keeping an eye on two major demographic trends: aging baby boomers and maturing Millennials [1982-2002 approximately].

Why it’s important

The impact of large population shifts propagate throughout an economy benefitting certain sectors more than others and influencing a country’s growth prospects; tantalizing investing ideas?

Example:

For example, as baby boomers retire, we’ll likely see higher spending on health care, but less on education and raising children. Likewise, tech-savvy Millennials will likely prioritize consumption on experiences over cars and houses [leading economic indicator].

So, can we profit from these trends?

Assessment

Well maybe – maybe not! Overall economic prospects may not be completely affected by these trends. Spending habits on combined goods and services will shift, rather than rise or decline.

So, be careful. What matters most for your investment success is your demographics and investing according to your personal circumstances and goals [paradox-of-thrift].

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. https://medicalexecutivepost.com/dr-david-marcinkos-bookings/

Subscribe: MEDICAL EXECUTIVE POST for curated news, essays, opinions and analysis from the public health, economics, finance, marketing, IT, business and policy management ecosystem.

***

Filed under: Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Investing, Op-Editorials, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

INVESTING TRANSFORMATION: Artificial Intelligence

Posted on October 6, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Co-Pilot and A. I.

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Artificial Intelligence and Investing: A Transformative Partnership

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the world of investing, reshaping how decisions are made, risks are assessed, and portfolios are managed. As financial markets grow increasingly complex and data-driven, AI offers powerful tools to navigate this landscape with greater precision, speed, and insight.

At its core, AI refers to systems that can perform tasks typically requiring human intelligence—such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving. In investing, this translates into algorithms that can analyze vast amounts of financial data, detect patterns, and make predictions with remarkable accuracy. Machine learning, a subset of AI, enables these systems to improve over time by learning from new data, making them especially valuable in dynamic markets.

One of the most significant applications of AI in investing is algorithmic trading. These systems can execute trades at lightning speed, responding to market fluctuations in milliseconds. By analyzing historical data and real-time market conditions, AI-driven trading platforms can identify optimal entry and exit points, often outperforming human traders. High-frequency trading firms have long relied on such technologies to gain competitive advantages.

AI also enhances portfolio management through robo-advisors—digital platforms that use algorithms to provide personalized investment advice. These tools assess an investor’s goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon, then construct and manage a diversified portfolio accordingly. Robo-advisors democratize access to financial planning, offering low-cost, automated solutions to individuals who might not afford traditional advisory services.

Risk assessment is another area where AI shines. By processing alternative data sources—such as social media sentiment, news articles, and satellite imagery—AI can uncover hidden risks and opportunities. For instance, a sudden spike in negative sentiment around a company on Twitter might signal reputational issues, prompting investors to reevaluate their positions. AI models can also forecast macroeconomic trends, helping investors anticipate shifts in interest rates, inflation, or geopolitical events.

Moreover, AI is transforming fundamental analysis. Natural language processing (NLP) allows machines to read and interpret earnings reports, SEC filings, and analyst commentary. This enables investors to extract insights from unstructured data that would be time-consuming to analyze manually. AI can even detect subtle linguistic cues that may indicate a company’s future performance or management’s confidence.

Despite its advantages, AI in investing is not without challenges. Models can be opaque, making it difficult to understand how decisions are made—a phenomenon known as the “black box” problem. There’s also the risk of overfitting, where algorithms perform well on historical data but fail in real-world scenarios. Ethical concerns, such as bias in data and the potential for market manipulation, must also be addressed.

In conclusion, AI is reshaping the investing landscape, offering tools that enhance efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility. While it’s not a panacea, its integration into financial markets marks a profound shift in how capital is allocated and wealth is managed. As technology continues to evolve, investors who embrace AI will be better positioned to thrive in an increasingly data-driven world.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Refer, Like and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, CMP Program, economics, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, iMBA, Inc., Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Understanding Asset Allocation for Investment Success

Posted on October 3, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Delving Deeper into Asset Allocation

SPONSOR: http://www.CERTIFIEDMEDICALPLANNER.org

By Lon Jefferies MBA CFP® CMP®

Lon JeffriesAsset allocation is one of the key factors contributing to long-term investment success.

When designing a portfolio that represents their risk tolerance, investors should be aware that a portfolio that is 50% stocks is likely to obtain approximately half of the gain when the market advances but suffer only half the loss when the market declines.

This general principle frequently holds true over extended investing cycles, but can waiver during shorter holding periods.

Case Model

For example, a fairly typical physician client of mine who has a 50% stock, 50% bond portfolio has obtained a return of 4.62% over the last 12 months, while the S&P 500 has obtained a return of 14.31% over the same time period (as of 10/30/14).

An investor expecting to obtain half the return of the index would anticipate a return of 7.15%, and by this measuring stick, has underperformed the market by over 2.50% during the last year.

What caused this differential?

Answer

The issue resides in how we define “the market.” In this example, we use the S&P 500 index as a measure for how the market as a whole is performing. As you may know, the S&P 500 (and the Dow Jones Industrial Average, for that matter) consists solely of large company U.S. stocks.

Of course, a diversified portfolio owns a mixture of large, mid, and small cap U.S. stocks, as well as international and emerging market equities. Consequently, comparing the performance of a basket of only large cap stocks to the performance of a diversified portfolio made up of a variety of different asset classes isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison.

***

Stock_Market

***

Frequently, the diversified portfolio will outperform the non-diversified large cap index because several of the components of the diversified portfolio will obtain higher returns than those achieved by large cap holdings.

However, the past 12 months has been a case where a diversified portfolio underperformed the large cap index because large cap stocks were the best performing asset class over the time period. In fact, over the last twelve months, there has been a direct correlation between company size and stock performance (as of 10/30/14):

  • Large Cap Stocks (S&P 500): 14.92%
  • Mid Cap Stocks (Russell Mid Cap): 11.08%
  • Small Cap Stocks (Russell 2000): 4.45%
  • International Stocks (Dow Jones Developed Markets): -1.05%
  • Emerging Market Stocks (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets): -1.04%

Since large cap stocks were the best performing element of a diversified portfolio over the last 12 months, in retrospect, an investor would have obtained a superior return by owning only large cap stocks during the period as opposed to owning a diversified mix of different equities. Does this mean owning only large cap stocks rather than a diversified portfolio is the best investment approach going forward? Of course not.

Year after year, we don’t know which asset category will provide the best return and a diversified portfolio ensures we have exposure to each year’s big winner. Additionally, although large caps were this year’s winner, they could easily be next year’s big loser, and a diversified portfolio ensures we don’t have all our investment eggs in one basket.

Financial Planning MDs 2015

Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

Assessment

Don’t be overly concerned if your diversified portfolio is underperforming a non-diversified benchmark over a short period of time. As always, long-term results should be more heavily weighted than short-term swings, and having a diversified portfolio is likely to maximize the probability of coming out ahead over an extended period.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details  Product Details

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Experts Invited, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Financial Planning for Physicians: Achieve Your Goals

Posted on September 30, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Your medical practice. Your personal goals. Your financial plan. Our experienced confirmation guide.

***

***

When you know exactly where you are today, have a vision of where you want to be tomorrow, and have trusted counsel at your side, you have already achieved so much success. Marcinko Associates works to keep you at that level of confidence every day. We use a comprehensive economic process to uncover what’s most important to you and then develop a financial strategy that gives you the highest probability of achieving your monetary goals.

We assess, plan, and opine for your success

To accurately see where you are today, chart a strategic path to your goals and help you make the most informed decisions to keep you on financial track, our key services for physicians and high net worth medical clients include:

  • Investment Portfolio Review
  • Fee, Charge and Cost Review
  • Comprehensive Financial Planning
  • Insurance Reviews
  • Estate Planning
  • Investment and Asset Management Second Opinions

We take a deep dive into your financial retirement plans

Physicians and dental employers now have options for how to design and deliver retirement benefits and we can help you make the best choice for your healthcare business. Our services for retirement plans include:

  • Fee, Charges & Fiduciary Review
  • Portfolio Analysis
  • Single Employer Retirement Plan Advisory
  • Retirement Plans Risk Analysis
  • Capital Funding and Financing
  • Business Planning and Practice Valuations
  • Career Development
  • and more!

We take a broad and balanced look at your financial life life

We coordinate our recommendations with your other advisors, including attorneys, accountants, insurance professionals and others, to ensure each decision is consistent with your goals and overall strategy. For example, through our partnerships we offer physician colleagues deeper expanded advisory services, like:

  • Estate, Gift, and Trust Planning
  • Tax Planning and Compliance
  • Medical or Dental Practice Worth
  • Business Succession Planning
  • Practice Exit Planning
  • Transaction Advisory Services
  • and more!

EDUCATION: Books

CONTACT US TODAY: Ann Miller RN MHA at: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com

***

Fiduciary Financial Colleagues Advising Medical Colleagues … in Turbulent Times!

***

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Accounting, Career Development, Estate Planning, Ethics, Experts Invited, Financial Advisor Listings, Financial Planning, iMBA, Inc., Insurance Matters, Investing, Managed Care, Marcinko Associates, Practice Management, Practice Worth | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Unlocking the Power of Compounding in Investments

Posted on September 29, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Time is both our ally and our enemy?

In the case of financial investments, compounding interest relies on time to reveal its true magic.

Here’s how: a young investor can invest less money over a longer period of time than an older investor who invests more money over a shorter period and ends up with more in the end. Compounding returns grow exponentially, making time more than an ally – but a force of the universe driving growth. 

Time is certainly our ally in investing, but according to ME-P Editor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd, you’ll kick yourself wishing you had invested earlier when you witness compounding after a few years (or a decade).

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Career Development, Experts Invited, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, iMBA, Inc., Investing | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Overcoming Financial Psychological Traps

Posted on September 27, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Psychological Traps

As human beings, our brains are booby-trapped with psychological barriers that stand between making smart financial decisions and making dumb ones. The good news is that once you realize your own mental weaknesses, it’s not impossible to overcome them. 

PARADOX: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/01/05/maurice-allais-behavioral-finance-paradox/

In fact, Mandi Woodruff, a financial reporter whose work has appeared in Yahoo! Finance, Daily Finance, The Wall Street Journal, The Fiscal Times and the Financial Times among others; related the following mind-traps in a September 2013 essay for the finance vertical Business Insider; as these impediments are now entering the lay-public zeitgeist:

  • Anchoring happens when we place too much emphasis on the first piece of information we receive regarding a given subject. For instance, when shopping for a wedding ring a salesman might tell us to spend three months’ salary. After hearing this, we may feel like we are doing something wrong if we stray from this advice, even though the guideline provided may cause us to spend more than we can afford.
  • Myopia makes it hard for us to imagine what our lives might be like in the future. For example, because we are young, healthy, and in our prime earning years now, it may be hard for us to picture what life will be like when our health depletes and we know longer have the earnings necessary to support our standard of living. This short-sightedness makes it hard to save adequately when we are young, when saving does the most good.
  • Gambler’s fallacy occurs when we subconsciously believe we can use past events to predict the future. It is common for the hottest sector during one calendar year to attract the most investors the following year. Of course, just because an investment did well last year doesn’t mean it will continue to do well this year. In fact, it is more likely to lag the market.
  • Avoidance is simply procrastination. Even though you may only have the opportunity to adjust your health care plan through your employer once per year, researching alternative health plans is too much work and too boring for us to get around to it. Consequently, we stick with a plan that may not be best for us.
  • Loss aversion affected many investors during the stock market crash of 2008. During the crash, many people decided they couldn’t afford to lose more and sold their investments. Of course, this caused the investors to sell at market troughs and miss the quick, dramatic recovery.
  • Overconfident investing happens when we believe we can out-smart other investors via market timing or through quick, frequent trading. Data convincingly shows that people who trade most often under perform the market by a significant margin over time.
  • Mental accounting takes place when we assign different values to money depending on where we get it from. For instance, even though we may have an aggressive saving goal for the year, it is likely easier for us to save money that we worked for than money that was given to us as a gift.
  • Herd mentality makes it very hard for humans to not take action when everyone around us does. For example, we may hear stories of people making significant profits buying, fixing up, and flipping homes and have the desire to get in on the action, even though we have no experience in real estate.

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit a RFP for speaking engagements: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com 

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", "Doctors Only", Ethics, Experts Invited, Financial Advisor Listings, Glossary Terms, Investing, mental health | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

VALUE STOCKS: Discovering Under Priced Investment Gems

Posted on September 24, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

BY DR. DAVID EDWARD MARCINKO; MBA MEd CMP™

***

***

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Value Stocks – Looking for Bargains!

The bargain-hunting value style is looking for shares that are under priced in relation to the company’s future potential. A physician value investor will invest in a company in the expectation that its shares will increase in value over time. Value investing is based essentially on quantitative criteria; asset values, cash flow, and discounted future earnings. The key properties of value shares are low Price/Earnings, Price/Sales ratios, and normally higher dividend yields. 

On observing a company’s earnings growth, a value manager will decide whether to buy shares based on the company’s consistency or recovery prospects.

The key research questions are: 1) Does the current P/E ratio warrant an investment in a slow growth company or, 2) Is the company a higher growth candidate that has dropped in price due to a temporary problem.  If this is the case, will the company’s earnings growth recover, and if so, when? The key to value investing is to find bargain shares (priced low historically or for temporary and/or irrational reasons), avoiding shares that are merely cheap (priced low because the company is failing).

The buying opportunity is identified when a company undergoing some immediate problems is perceived to have good chances of recovery in the medium to long term.  If there is a loss in market confidence in the company, the share price may fall, and the value investor can step in. Once the share price has achieved a suitable value, reflecting the predicted turnaround in company performance, the shareholding is sold, realizing a capital gain.

And, a potential risk in value investing is that the company may not turn around, in which case the share price may stay static or fall.

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit a RFP for speaking engagements: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com 

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Experts Invited, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Investing | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Understanding Merger Arbitrage Strategies

Posted on September 24, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, iMBA, iMBA, Inc., Investing, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Understanding Merger Arbitrage Strategies

3 Behavioral Biases Hurting Your Finances

Posted on September 23, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

The study of behavioral economics has revealed much about how different biases can affect our finances—often for the worse.

Take loss aversion: Because we feel a financial setback more acutely than a commensurate gain, we often cling to failed investments to avoid realizing the loss. Another potential hazard is present bias, or the tendency to prefer instant gratification over long-term reward, even if the latter gain is greater.

When it comes to money, sometimes it’s difficult to make rational decisions. Here, are three behavioral financial biases that could be impeding financial goals.

ANCHORING BIAS

Anchoring Bias happens when we place too much emphasis on the first piece of information we receive regarding a given subject. Anchoring is the mental trick your brain plays when it latches onto the first piece of information it gets, no matter how irrelevant. You might know this as a ‘first impression’ when someone relies on their own first idea of a person or situation.

Example: When shopping for a wedding ring a salesman might tell us to spend three months’ salary. After hearing this, we may feel like we are doing something wrong if we stray from this financial advice, even though the guideline provided may cause us to spend more than we can afford.

Example: Imagine you’re buying a car, and the salesperson starts with a high price. That number sticks in your mind and influences all your subsequent negotiations. Anchoring can skew our decisions and perceptions, making us think the first offer is more important than it is. Or, subsequent offers lower than they really are.

Example: Imagine an investor named Jane who purchased 100 shares of XYZ Corporation at $100 per share several years ago. Over time, the stock price declined to $60 per share. Jane is anchored to her initial price of $100 and is reluctant to sell at a loss because she keeps hoping the stock will return to her original purchase price. She continues to hold onto the stock, even as it declines, due to her anchoring bias. Eventually, the stock price drops to $40 per share, resulting in significant losses for Jane.

In this example, Jane’s nchoring bias to the original purchase price of $100 prevents her from rationalizing to sell the stock and cut her losses, even though market conditions have changed. So, the next time you’re haggling for your self, a potential customer or client, or making another big financial decision, be aware of that initial anchor dragging you down.

HERD MENTALITY BIAS

Herd Mentality Bias makes it very hard for humans to not take action when everyone around us does.

Example: We may hear stories of people making significant monetary profits buying, fixing up, and flipping homes and have the desire to get in on the action, even though we have no experience in real estate.

Example: During the dotcom bubble of the late 1990’s many investors exhibited a herd mentality. As technology stocks soared to astronomical valuations, investors rushed to buy these stocks driven by the fear of missing out on the gains others were enjoying. Even though some of these stocks had questionable fundamentals, the herd mentality led investors to follow the crowd.

In this example, the herd mentality contributed to the overvaluation of technology stocks. Eventually, it led to the dot-com bubble’s burst, causing significant losses for those who had unthinkingly followed the crowd without conducting proper research or analysis.

OVERCONFIDENT INVESTING BIAS

Overconfident Investing Bias happens when we believe we can out-smart other investors via market timing or through quick, frequent trading. This causes the results of a study to be unreliable and hard to reproduce in other research settings.

Example: Data convincingly shows that people and financial planners/advisors and wealth managers who trade most often under-perform the market by a significant margin over time. Active traders lose money.

Example: Overconfidence Investing Bias moreover leads to: (1) excessive trading (which in turn results in lower returns due to costs incurred), (2) underestimation of risk (portfolios of decreasing risk were found for single men, married men, married women, and single women), (3) illusion of knowledge (you can get a lot more data nowadays on the internet) and (4) illusion of control (on-line trading).

ASSESSMENT

Finally, questions remain after consuming this cognitive bias review.

Question: Can behavioral cognitive biases be eliminated by financial advisors in prospecting and client sales endeavors?

A: Indeed they can significantly reduce their impact by appreciating and understanding the above and following a disciplined and rational decision-making sales process.

Question: What is the role of financial advisors in helping clients and prospects address behavioral biases?

A: Financial advisors can provide an objective perspective and help investors recognize and address their biases. They can assist in creating well-structured investment and financial plans, setting realistic goals, and offering guidance to ensure investment decisions align with long-term objectives.

Question: How important is self-discipline in overcoming behavioral biases?

A; Self-discipline is crucial in overcoming behavioral biases. It helps investors and advisors adhere to their investment plans, avoid impulsive decisions, and stay focused on long-term goals reducing the influence of emotional and cognitive biases.

CONCLUSION

Remember, it is far more useful to listen to client beliefs, fears and goals, and to suggest options and offer encouragement to help them discover their own path toward financial well-being. Then, incentivize them with knowledge of the above psychological biases to your mutual success!

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com 

REFERENCES:

  • Marcinko, DE; Dictionary of Health Insurance and Managed Care. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 2007.
  • Marcinko, DE: Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™. Productivity Press, NY, 2016.
  • Marcinko, DE: Risk Management, Liability and Insurance Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™. Productivity Press, NY, 2017.
  • Nofsinger, JR: The Psychology of Investing. Rutledge Publishing, 2022
  • Winters, Scott:  The 10X Financial Advisor: Your Blueprint for Massive and Sustainable Growth. Absolute Author Publishing House, 2020.
  • Woodruff, Mandy: https://www.mandimoney.com

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like, Subscribe and Refer

***

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Career Development, CMP Program, economics, Experts Invited, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, mental health, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

How Investment Banking Works for Corporations

Posted on September 22, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Investment bankers are not really bankers at all. The fact that the word banker appears in the name is partially responsible for the false impressions that exist in the medical community regarding the functions they perform.

For example, they are not permitted to accept deposit, provide checking accounts, or perform other activities normally construed to be commercial banking activities. An investment bank is simply a firm that specializes in helping other corporations obtain money they need under the most advantageous terms possible. When it comes to the actual process of having securities issued, the corporation approaches an investment banking firm, either directly, or through a competitive selection process and asks it to act as adviser and distributor.

MORE: https://www.amazon.ca/Management-Liability-Insurance-Protection-Strategies/dp/1498725988

Investment bankers, or under writers, as they are sometimes called, are middlemen in the capital markets for corporate securities. The corporation requiring the funds discusses the amount, type of security to be issued, price and other features of the security, as well as the cost to issuing the securities. All of these factors are negotiated in a process known as negotiated underwriting. If mutually acceptable terms are reached, the investment banking firm will be the middle man through which the securities are sold to the general public. Since such firms have many customers, they are able to sell new securities, without the costly search that individual corporations may require to sell its own security.

Thus, although the firm in need of additional capital must pay for the service, it is usually able to raise the additional capital at less expense through the use of an investment banker, than by selling the securities itself. The agreement between the investment banker and the corporation may be one of two types. The investment bank may agree to purchase, or underwrite, the entire issue of securities and to re-offer them to the general public. This is known as a firm commitment.

When an investment banker agrees to underwrite such a sale; it agrees to supply the corporation with a specified amount of money. The firm buys the securities with the intention to resell them. If it fails to sell the securities, the investment banker must still pay the agreed upon sum.

Thus, the risk of selling rests with the underwriter and not with the company issuing the securities.

INVESTMENT BANKING: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/04/17/understanding-tnvestment-banking-rules-securities-markets-brokerage-accounts-margin-and-debt/

***


The alternative agreement is a best efforts agreement in which the investment banker makes his best effort to sell the securities acting on behalf of the issuer, but does not guarantee a specified amount of money will be raised. When a corporation raises new capital through a public offering of stock, one might inquire where the stock comes from. The only source the corporation has is authorized, but previously un-issued stock. Anytime authorized, but previously un-issued stock (new stock) is issued to the public, it is known as a primary offering.

If it’s the very first time the corporation is making the offering, it’s also known as the Initial Public Offering (IPO). Anytime there is a primary offering of stock, the issuing corporation is raising additional equity capital.

A secondary offering, or distribution, on the other hand, is defined as an offering of a large block of outstanding stock. Most frequently, a secondary offering is the sale of a large block of stock owned by one or more stockholders. It is stock that has previously been issued and is now being re-sold by investors. Another case would be when a corporation re-sells its treasury stock.

STOCK BROKERS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/09/04/understanding-traditional-full-service-brokers/

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, Funding Basics, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

INVESTING PARADOX: Flexibile and Dogmatic

Posted on September 17, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

A paradox is a statement or situation that seems contradictory but actually makes sense when you think about it more deeply. It challenges logic and often reveals a hidden truth.

FLEXIBLY DOGMATIC PARADOX

The Flexibly Dogmatic Paradox suggests that no matter how sensible your financial planning, investing or wealth management process is there will be uncomfortably long periods when it looks broken. And process is the best way of ensuring you keep standing for something because if you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything. This is why, when assessing an investment fund, focus 50% on the manager’s character and 50% on their process. Everything else is detail. There are few guarantees in investing, but the fact that markets will batter you emotionally is one of them.

FINANCIAL PARADOX: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/07/27/paradox-of-financial-health/

Example: During volatile times, the temptation to abandon the process is strong. But that’s why it’s there. Process is what forces one fund manager to keep buying unbroken companies when everyone else thinks they’re bust, and another to keep faith with a top-quality company when the mob says it’s too expensive The best fund managers dogmatically stick to their process when it’s out of favor. Then, when it returns to favor, the elastic pings back: they recapture lost ground surprisingly fast. However, every rule has an exception. And spotting the exceptions to their process is something the true greats have a knack for buying and selling.

***

***

Example:  In 2007, US value manager Bill Miller had the makings of an investment legend, but the financial crisis wrecked all that. His process told him to double down into falling share prices, which had worked well for years. But it doesn’t work if the companies go bust, which many of his financial stocks did in 2008.

ADVISORS PARADOX: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/06/20/paradoxical-contradictions-all-financial-advisors-must-know-to-win-clients/

Conclusion

The fact is that no matter how good it is, a process operated without human judgment is just an algorithm. The best fund managers and financial prospectors and sales men/women know this.

They stick dogmatically to their process but somehow remain flexible enough to spot the occasions when it’s about to drive them into a brick wall.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: CMP Program, Ethics, Experts Invited, finance, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Marcinko Associates, mental health, Portfolio Management | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Next Page »