BOARD CERTIFICATION EXAM STUDY GUIDES Lower Extremity Trauma
[Click on Image to Enlarge]
ME-P Free Advertising Consultation
The “Medical Executive-Post” is about connecting doctors, health care executives and modern consulting advisors. It’s about free-enterprise, business, practice, policy, personal financial planning and wealth building capitalism. We have an attitude that’s independent, outspoken, intelligent and so Next-Gen; often edgy, usually controversial. And, our consultants “got fly”, just like U. Read it! Write it! Post it! “Medical Executive-Post”. Call or email us for your FREE advertising and sales consultation TODAY [678.779.8597] Email: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Medical & Surgical e-Consent Forms
ePodiatryConsentForms.com
iMBA Inc., OFFICES
Suite #5901 Wilbanks Drive, Norcross, Georgia, 30092 USA [1.678.779.8597]. Our location is real and we are now virtually enabled to assist new long distance clients and out-of-town colleagues.
ME-P Publishing
SEEKING INDUSTRY INFO PARTNERS?
If you want the opportunity to work with leading health care industry insiders, innovators and watchers, the “ME-P” may be right for you? We are unbiased and operate at the nexus of theoretical and applied R&D. Collaborate with us and you’ll put your brand in front of a smart & tightly focused demographic; one at the forefront of our emerging healthcare free marketplace of informed and professional “movers and shakers.” Our Ad Rate Card is available upon request [678-779-8597].
Posted on January 3, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
Alternative health coverage models like Short-Term Duration Plans, Health Care Sharing Ministries (HCSMs), and Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangements (ICHRAs) offer flexible, cost-conscious options for individuals and employers seeking alternatives to traditional insurance.
As the landscape of American healthcare continues to evolve, many consumers and employers are exploring non-traditional coverage models to address rising costs, limited access, and regulatory complexity. Among the most prominent alternatives are Short-Term Duration Plans, Health Care Sharing Ministries (HCSMs), and Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangements (ICHRAs)—each offering distinct advantages and trade-offs.
Short-Term Duration Plans are designed to provide temporary coverage for individuals experiencing gaps in insurance, such as between jobs or during waiting periods. These plans are typically less expensive than ACA-compliant insurance but come with significant limitations. They often exclude coverage for pre-existing conditions, maternity care, mental health services, and prescription drugs. While they offer affordability and quick enrollment, they lack the comprehensive protections mandated by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), making them a risky choice for those with ongoing health needs.
Health Care Sharing Ministries (HCSMs) represent a faith-based approach to healthcare financing. Members contribute monthly fees into a shared pool used to cover eligible medical expenses for others in the group. These arrangements are not insurance and are not regulated by state insurance departments, meaning they are not required to cover essential health benefits or guarantee payment. However, HCSMs appeal to individuals seeking community-based support and lower costs. They often include moral or religious requirements for membership and may exclude coverage for lifestyle-related conditions or services deemed inconsistent with their beliefs.
***
***
Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangements (ICHRAs) are employer-sponsored programs that allow businesses to reimburse employees for individual health insurance premiums and qualified medical expenses. Introduced in 2020, ICHRAs offer flexibility for employers to control costs while giving employees the freedom to choose plans that suit their needs. Unlike traditional group health insurance, ICHRAs shift the purchasing power to employees, promoting consumer choice and market competition. However, they require employees to navigate the individual insurance marketplace, which can be complex and variable depending on location and income.
Other emerging models include Direct Primary Care (DPC), where patients pay a monthly fee for unlimited access to a primary care provider, and Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) paired with high-deductible plans, which encourage consumer-driven healthcare spending. These models emphasize affordability, personalization, and preventive care, but may not offer sufficient protection against catastrophic health events.
In conclusion, alternative health coverage models provide valuable options for individuals and employers seeking flexibility and cost savings. However, they often come with trade-offs in coverage, regulation, and consumer protection. As ACA subsidies fluctuate and healthcare costs rise, these models are likely to gain traction—but consumers must carefully assess their health needs, financial risks, and eligibility before choosing a non-traditional path.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Posted on November 20, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
Shaping Well-being Beyond Medicine
Health is often thought of as the result of medical care, but in reality, it is deeply influenced by the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. These conditions, known as social determinants of health, include a wide range of social, economic, and environmental factors that shape health outcomes. They are responsible for many of the differences in health status between individuals and communities. Understanding these determinants is essential for promoting fairness in health and designing policies that reduce disparities.
Economic Stability
Economic stability is one of the most powerful determinants of health. Individuals with steady income can afford nutritious food, safe housing, and preventive healthcare. Conversely, poverty increases vulnerability to chronic diseases, mental health challenges, and limited access to medical services. Families with fewer financial resources may struggle to afford medications or healthy diets, leading to higher rates of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Unemployment or unstable work further exacerbates stress, which itself is linked to poor health outcomes. Economic inequality directly translates into health inequality.
Education
Education shapes health both directly and indirectly. Higher educational attainment is associated with better employment opportunities, higher income, and improved health literacy. People with more education are more likely to understand medical information, adopt healthy behaviors, and navigate healthcare systems effectively. Limited education can perpetuate cycles of poverty and poor health. For instance, children who grow up in underfunded schools may face restricted opportunities, leading to lower lifetime earnings and poorer health outcomes. Education is therefore a critical lever for breaking intergenerational cycles of disadvantage.
***
***
Neighborhood and Physical Environment
The environment in which individuals live plays a crucial role in determining health. Safe neighborhoods with clean air, accessible parks, and reliable transportation promote physical activity and reduce exposure to pollutants. In contrast, communities with high crime rates, poor housing, and environmental hazards contribute to stress, injury, and illness. Food deserts—areas with limited access to affordable, healthy food—are a striking example of how environment shapes health. Residents in these areas often rely on processed foods, increasing risks of obesity and related diseases. Housing quality also matters: overcrowding, mold, or lead exposure can lead to respiratory illnesses and developmental delays.
Healthcare Access and Quality
Access to healthcare is a fundamental determinant, but it is shaped by social and economic factors. Insurance coverage, affordability, and cultural competence of providers influence whether individuals receive timely and effective care. Marginalized groups often face barriers such as discrimination, language differences, or lack of nearby facilities. Even when healthcare is available, disparities in quality persist. For example, minority populations may receive less aggressive treatment for certain conditions compared to others. Addressing these inequities requires systemic reforms that prioritize inclusivity and affordability.
Social and Community Context
Social relationships and community support networks significantly affect health. Strong social ties provide emotional support, reduce stress, and encourage healthy behaviors. Communities with high levels of trust and civic engagement often experience better health outcomes. Conversely, discrimination, racism, and social exclusion undermine health by increasing stress and limiting opportunities. Social cohesion and equity are therefore vital for fostering healthier societies.
Conclusion
The social determinants of health highlight that medicine alone cannot ensure well-being. Economic stability, education, environment, healthcare access, and social context collectively shape health outcomes and drive disparities. Addressing these determinants requires a holistic approach that integrates public health, social policy, and community action. By investing in education, reducing poverty, improving neighborhoods, and ensuring equitable healthcare, societies can move closer to achieving health equity. Ultimately, health is not just about treating illness—it is about creating conditions in which everyone has the opportunity to thrive.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on November 19, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
Doctors use loss leader tactics—offering discounted or free services—to attract new patients and build long-term loyalty. These strategies are increasingly common in competitive healthcare markets.
In today’s healthcare landscape, physicians and clinics face intense competition for patient attention. Traditional referral systems are no longer sufficient, as patients increasingly rely on online reviews, social media, and digital advertising to choose providers. To stand out, many doctors have adopted loss leader marketing tactics—a strategy borrowed from retail where a business offers a product or service at a loss to attract customers and stimulate future sales.
A loss leader in healthcare typically involves offering free consultations, discounted exams, or low-cost procedures. For example, aesthetic clinics might advertise free skin evaluations or reduced-price Botox sessions. Primary care practices may offer complimentary wellness screenings or discounted flu shots. These services are not intended to generate immediate profit but to introduce patients to the practice, build trust, and encourage them to return for more comprehensive—and profitable—care.
This tactic works particularly well in specialties where patients have discretionary choice, such as dermatology, dentistry, chiropractic care, and cosmetic surgery. By lowering the barrier to entry, doctors can attract hesitant or price-sensitive patients who might otherwise delay care. Once inside the practice, patients experience the quality of service firsthand, increasing the likelihood of repeat visits and word-of-mouth referrals.
***
***
Digital marketing amplifies the effectiveness of loss leader strategies. Physicians use platforms like Google Ads, Facebook, and Instagram to promote their offers to targeted demographics. A well-designed landing page might advertise a “$49 New Patient Exam” with a clear call to action and online booking. These campaigns often include retargeting ads and email follow-ups to nurture leads into loyal patients.
However, loss leader tactics must be carefully managed. Offering services below cost can strain resources if not paired with a clear conversion strategy. Doctors must ensure that the initial offer leads to higher-value services, such as diagnostic testing, treatment plans, or elective procedures. Additionally, practices must maintain ethical standards and avoid misleading promotions that could erode patient trust.
Reputation management plays a crucial role in sustaining the benefits of loss leader marketing. Positive patient experiences from initial discounted visits often translate into glowing online reviews, which further attract new patients. Conversely, poor execution—such as rushed appointments or upselling pressure—can backfire and damage the practice’s credibility.
Ultimately, loss leader marketing is not about giving away services indefinitely. It’s a strategic investment in patient acquisition, brand building, and long-term growth. When executed thoughtfully, it allows doctors to showcase their expertise, differentiate their practice, and foster lasting relationships with patients.
In conclusion, loss leader tactics have become a powerful tool in the modern physician’s marketing arsenal. By offering low-cost entry points to care, doctors can attract new patients, build trust, and grow their practice sustainably.
As competition intensifies, those who master this strategy—while maintaining quality and transparency—will be best positioned to thrive in the evolving healthcare marketplace.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on November 13, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
BASIC DEFINITIONS
***
***
The Direct Reimbursement Payment Model allows physicians to receive payment directly from patients or employers, bypassing traditional insurance systems. This model emphasizes transparency, autonomy, and personalized care, offering an alternative to fee-for-service and managed care structures.
The Direct Reimbursement Payment Model is a healthcare financing approach in which physicians are paid directly by patients or sponsoring entities—such as employers—rather than through insurance companies or government programs. This model is gaining traction as a response to the administrative burdens, opaque billing practices, and fragmented care often associated with traditional insurance-based systems.
One prominent example of direct reimbursement is Direct Primary Care (DPC). In DPC, patients pay a recurring fee—monthly, quarterly, or annually—that covers a broad range of primary care services. These include routine checkups, preventive screenings, chronic disease management, and basic lab work. By eliminating third-party billing, DPC practices reduce overhead costs and administrative complexity, allowing physicians to spend more time with patients and focus on quality care.
***
***
Employers have also embraced direct reimbursement models to manage healthcare costs and improve employee wellness. In such arrangements, employers reimburse physicians or clinics directly for services rendered to their employees, often through a defined benefit structure. This can be part of a self-funded health plan or a supplemental offering alongside high-deductible insurance policies. The goal is to provide accessible, cost-effective care while avoiding the inefficiencies of traditional insurance networks.
Key advantages of the direct reimbursement model include:
Price transparency: Patients know upfront what services cost, reducing surprise billing and financial stress.
Improved access: Physicians often offer same-day or next-day appointments, extended visits, and direct communication via phone or email.
Lower administrative burden: Without insurance paperwork, practices can operate more efficiently and focus on patient care.
Stronger patient-physician relationships: More time per visit fosters trust, continuity, and better health outcomes.
However, the model is not without limitations. Direct reimbursement may not cover specialist care, hospitalization, or emergency services, requiring patients to maintain supplemental insurance. Additionally, the model may be less accessible to low-income populations who cannot afford recurring fees or out-of-pocket payments. Critics also argue that widespread adoption could fragment care and reduce risk pooling, undermining the broader goals of universal coverage.
Despite these concerns, the direct reimbursement model aligns with broader trends in healthcare reform, including value-based care, consumer empowerment, and decentralized service delivery. It offers a viable path for physicians seeking autonomy and for patients desiring personalized, transparent care. As healthcare continues to evolve, hybrid models that combine direct reimbursement with traditional insurance may emerge, offering flexibility and choice across diverse patient populations.
In conclusion, the Direct Reimbursement Payment Model represents a meaningful shift in how healthcare services are financed and delivered.
By prioritizing simplicity, transparency, and patient-centered care, it challenges the status quo and opens new possibilities for sustainable, high-quality medical practice.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on November 10, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
Ricardian economics, rooted in the theories of 19th-century economist David Ricardo, emphasizes comparative advantage, free trade, and the neutrality of government debt—most notably through the concept of Ricardian equivalence. While these ideas have shaped macroeconomic thought, their relevance to medicine and healthcare policy is less direct. Still, exploring Ricardian principles offers a provocative lens through which to examine the fiscal sustainability and efficiency of modern healthcare systems.
At the heart of Ricardian equivalence is the idea that consumers are forward-looking and internalize government budget constraints. If a government finances healthcare through debt rather than taxes, rational agents will anticipate future tax burdens and adjust their behavior accordingly. In theory, this undermines the effectiveness of deficit-financed healthcare spending as a stimulus. Applied to medicine, this suggests that long-term fiscal responsibility is crucial: expanding healthcare access through borrowing may not yield the intended economic or health benefits if citizens expect future costs to rise.
This insight could inform debates on healthcare reform, especially in countries grappling with ballooning medical expenditures. Ricardian economics warns against short-term fixes that ignore long-term fiscal implications. For example, expanding public insurance programs without sustainable funding mechanisms could lead to intergenerational inequities and economic distortions. Policymakers might instead focus on reforms that align incentives, reduce waste, and promote cost-effective care—principles that resonate with Ricardo’s emphasis on efficiency and comparative advantage.
***
***
However, Ricardian economics offers limited guidance on the unique moral and practical dimensions of medicine. Healthcare is not a typical market good. Patients often lack the information or autonomy to make rational choices, especially in emergencies. Moreover, the sector is rife with externalities: one person’s vaccination benefits the broader community, and untreated illness can strain public resources. These complexities challenge the assumption of rational, forward-looking behavior central to Ricardian equivalence.
Additionally, Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage—where nations benefit by specializing in goods they produce most efficiently—has implications for global health. It supports international collaboration in pharmaceutical production, medical research, and telemedicine. Yet, over-reliance on global supply chains can expose vulnerabilities, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic when countries faced shortages of critical medical supplies.
In conclusion, Ricardian economics provides valuable fiscal insights that can inform healthcare policy, particularly regarding debt sustainability and efficient resource allocation. Its emphasis on long-term planning and comparative advantage can guide reforms that make medicine more resilient and cost-effective. However, the theory’s assumptions about rational behavior and market dynamics limit its applicability to the nuanced realities of healthcare. Medicine requires not just economic efficiency but ethical considerations, equity, and compassion—areas where Ricardian economics falls short. Thus, while it can contribute to the conversation, it cannot “save” medicine alone.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Posted on November 8, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd and Copilot A.I.
***
***
The Baylor method of nurse payments is a scheduling and compensation model that allows nurses to work weekend shifts while receiving full-time pay and benefits, offering flexibility and helping healthcare facilities address staffing shortages.
The Baylor method, also known as the Baylor Plan or Baylor Shift, originated at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, as a strategic response to nurse shortages and burnout. It was designed to retain experienced nurses by offering a more flexible work schedule that still met the demands of patient care. Under this model, nurses typically work two 12-hour shifts on the weekend—Saturday and Sunday—and receive compensation equivalent to a full 40-hour workweek.
This approach has become increasingly popular in hospitals, long-term care facilities, and other healthcare settings. The core idea is simple: by concentrating work hours into the weekend, nurses gain more time off during the week while employers maintain adequate staffing during traditionally hard-to-fill shifts. For many nurses, this arrangement provides a better work-life balance, allowing them to pursue education, spend time with family, or take on additional employment during the week.
***
***
Financially, the Baylor method is attractive to both nurses and employers. Nurses benefit from full-time pay and benefits—including health insurance, retirement contributions, and paid time off—while only working two days per week. Employers, on the other hand, can reduce turnover and improve weekend staffing without increasing overall labor costs. Some facilities even offer Baylor shifts with added incentives, such as shift differentials or bonuses, to further encourage weekend coverage.
However, the Baylor method is not without its challenges. Working two consecutive 12-hour shifts can be physically and emotionally demanding, especially in high-acuity units. Nurses may experience fatigue or burnout if they are not adequately supported. Additionally, because Baylor nurses are paid for 40 hours while only working 24, scheduling extra shifts during the week can complicate overtime calculations. Typically, overtime pay only kicks in after 40 actual hours worked, not hours paid, which can lead to confusion or dissatisfaction if not clearly communicated.
From an operational standpoint, the Baylor method helps facilities maintain consistent staffing levels during weekends, which are often underserved due to lower availability of part-time or weekday-only staff. It also allows for more predictable scheduling and can improve patient outcomes by ensuring continuity of care. Facilities that adopt the Baylor model often report higher nurse satisfaction and retention rates.
In conclusion, the Baylor method of nurse payments is a creative and effective solution to some of the most persistent challenges in healthcare staffing. By offering full-time compensation for weekend work, it provides nurses with flexibility and financial stability while helping facilities maintain high-quality care. As healthcare continues to evolve, models like the Baylor shift demonstrate the importance of innovative scheduling strategies that support both caregivers and patients.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on November 7, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Health Capital Consultants, LLC
***
***
An October 2025 Health Affairs study found that payment equity between facilities owned by hospitals, known as hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs), and independent outpatient facilities such as ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), is still far from reality. Comparing payments for common procedures, researchers found commercial prices were 78% higher in HOPDs compared to ASCs, although payment differentials varied considerably.
This Health Capital Topics article reviews the article and potential policy implications. (Read more…)
Posted on November 5, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
The Sraffa–Hayek debate stands as a pivotal moment in the history of economic thought, highlighting deep philosophical and methodological differences between two influential schools: the Austrian School, represented by Friedrich Hayek, and the neo-Ricardian or Cambridge School, represented by Piero Sraffa. Taking place primarily in the 1930s, this intellectual exchange centered on the nature of capital, the role of equilibrium, and the validity of marginalist theory.
Friedrich Hayek, a staunch advocate of Austrian economics, had developed a theory of business cycles rooted in the mis allocation of capital due to artificially low interest rates. In his framework, interest rates serve as signals that coordinate inter temporal production decisions. When central banks distort these signals, they cause over investment in capital-intensive industries, leading to unsustainable booms followed by inevitable busts. Hayek’s theory was grounded in a time-structured view of capital, emphasizing the importance of temporal coordination in production.
Piero Sraffa, a Cambridge economist and close associate of John Maynard Keynes, challenged Hayek’s assumptions in a 1932 review of Hayek’s book Prices and Production. Sraffa’s critique was both technical and philosophical. He questioned the coherence of Hayek’s notion of a uniform natural rate of interest in a complex economy with heterogeneous capital goods. Sraffa argued that in such an economy, there could be multiple natural rates of interest, making it impossible to define a single rate that equilibrates savings and investment across all sectors.
Moreover, Sraffa criticized the Austrian reliance on equilibrium analysis in a world characterized by uncertainty and institutional complexity. He contended that Hayek’s model was overly abstract and detached from real-world dynamics. This critique foreshadowed Sraffa’s later work, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (1960), which laid the foundation for the neo-Ricardian critique of marginalist economics. In that work, Sraffa demonstrated that prices and distribution could be determined without recourse to subjective utility or marginal productivity, challenging the core of neoclassical theory.
The debate had far-reaching implications. For the Austrian School, it exposed vulnerabilities in their capital theory and prompted refinements in their approach to intertemporal coordination. For the broader economics profession, Sraffa’s critique contributed to a growing skepticism about the internal consistency of marginalist value theory, influencing the Cambridge capital controversies of the 1950s and 1960s.
While the Sraffa–Hayek debate did not produce a definitive victor, it underscored the importance of foundational assumptions in economic modeling. It also highlighted the tension between abstract theoretical elegance and empirical relevance—a tension that continues to shape economic discourse today. Ultimately, the debate enriched the intellectual landscape by forcing economists to confront the limitations of their models and to grapple with the complex realities of capital, time, and uncertainty.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Posted on November 3, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd
***
***
Classic Definition: In “The Exercise Paradox,” Herman Pontzer asserts that greater physical activity does not allow people to control weight. He goes on to describe studies on how the human body burns calories that help to explain why this is so.
Modern Circumstance: But in one of these studies, “couch potatoes” expended an average of around 200 fewer calories a day, compared with moderately active subjects. A difference of 200 fewer calories a day equates to more than 20 fewer pounds a year. Year after year after year, that really adds up.
Paradox Example: Cyclists participating in the Tour de France are said to ingest more than 5,000 calories a day. This would seem to be way too much. So why do they do it? And why don’t they become obese?
The Medical Executive-Post is a news and information aggregator and social media professional network for medical and financial service professionals. Feel free to submit education content to the site as well as links, text posts, images, opinions and videos which are then voted up or down by other members. Comments and dialog are especially welcomed. Daily posts are organized by subject. ME-P administrators moderate the activity. Moderation may also conducted by community-specific moderators who are unpaid volunteers.
Posted on November 2, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Health Capital Consultants, LLC
***
***
Since lawmakers failed to pass a bill to fund the federal government before the September 30, 2025 deadline, lawmakers have remained deadlocked over the spending bill. The deadlock is centered on the continuation of health insurance exchange subsidies, but the shutdown has broader implications on the healthcare industry.
This Health Capital Topics article provides an update on the continuing saga. (Read more…)
A paradox is a figure of speech that can seem silly or contradictory in form, yet it can still be true, or at least make sense in the context given. This is sometimes used to illustrate thoughts or statements that differ from traditional ideas. So, instead of taking a given statement literally, an individual must comprehend it from a different perspective. Using paradoxes in speeches and writings can also add wit and humor to one’s work, which serves as the perfect device to grab a reader or a listener’s attention.
But paradoxes can be quite difficult to explain by definition alone, which is why it is best to refer to a few examples to further your understanding.
A good paradox example is in the famous television show House. Here, Dr. House is a rude, selfish, and narcissistic character who alienates everyone around him, even his own colleagues. However, he is also a brilliant doctor who is committed to saving lives. Regardless of his mean exterior, Dr. House is a moral and compassionate man who cares about his patients. The paradox here is how the character strives to save people’s lives despite his ruthless personality and behavior.
Modern health care appears to be rich in contradictions, and it is claimed to be paradoxical in a number of ways. In particular health care is held to be a paradox itself: it is supposed to do good; but is also accused of doing harm.
The expression “first do no harm,” which is a Latin phrase, is not part of the original or modern versions of the Hippocratic Oath, which was originally written in Greek (“primum non nocere,” the Latin translation from the original Greek.)
The Hippocratic Oath, written in the 5th century BCE, does contain language suggesting that the physician and his assistants should not cause physical or moral harm to a patient.
The first known published version of “do no harm” dates to medical texts from the mid-19th century, and is attributed to the 17th century English physician Thomas Sydenham.
Difference between Paradox and Oxymoron
Most people tend to confuse a paradox with an oxymoron, and it’s not hard to see why. Most oxymoron examples appear to be compressed version of a paradox, in which it is used to add a dramatic effect and to emphasize contrasting thoughts. Although they may seem greatly similar in form, there are slight differences that set them apart.
A paradox consists of a statement with opposing definitions, while an oxymoron combines two contradictory terms to form a new meaning. But because an oxymoron can play out with just two words, it is often used to describe a given object or idea imaginatively. As for a paradox, the statement itself makes you question whether something is true or false. It appears to contradict the truth, but if given a closer look, the truth is there but is merely implied.
The Paradox in Medicine and Health Care
Dr. Bernard Brom [Editor: SA Journal of Natural Medicine] suggests modem medicine is riddled with paradoxes. Most doctors live with these paradoxes without being aware of the conflict of interest that these paradoxes represent. Intrinsic to a general understanding of science is the idea that science frees us from misunderstanding and guides us towards clear decision making.
Most veteran doctors with experience know that medical science still does not give definitive answers, that each individual is unique, that one can never be sure how a patient will respond to a particular drug, or what the outcome of a particular operation will be. Human beings are not machines and therefore do not respond according to Newtonian logic, and therefore a paradox in medicine is not surprising. Medicine is an art which uses scientific techniques and approaches. It is, however, important to face these paradoxes. It is both humbling and enlightening, enriching those who consider the implications deeply enough.
The Compensation versus Value Paradox
Regardless of specialty, degree designation or delivery model, private practice physician salary is traditionally inversely related to independent medical practice business value.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on October 29, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
Level-funded health care is an increasingly popular option for small to mid-sized businesses seeking a balance between cost control and comprehensive employee coverage. It blends features of fully insured and self-funded health plans, offering employers greater flexibility and potential savings while minimizing risk.
In a traditional fully insured plan, employers pay a fixed premium to an insurance carrier, which assumes all financial risk for employee claims. In contrast, self-funded plans allow employers to pay for claims out-of-pocket, which can lead to significant savings—but also exposes them to unpredictable costs. Level-funded plans sit between these two models, offering a structured and predictable approach to self-funding.
With level-funded health care, employers pay a fixed monthly amount that covers three components: estimated claims funding, stop-loss insurance, and administrative fees. The estimated claims portion is based on actuarial data and reflects the expected health care usage of the employee group. Stop-loss insurance protects the employer from catastrophic claims by capping their financial exposure. Administrative fees cover third-party services such as claims processing and customer support.
One of the key advantages of level-funded plans is the potential for cost savings. If actual claims fall below the estimated amount, employers may receive a refund or credit at the end of the year. This incentivizes wellness programs and preventive care, as healthier employees lead to lower claims. Additionally, level-funded plans often provide more transparency into claims data, allowing employers to better understand health trends and make informed decisions about benefits.
***
***
Another benefit is flexibility. Level-funded plans can be customized to suit the needs of a specific workforce, offering a range of coverage options and provider networks. This contrasts with the rigid structure of many fully insured plans. Employers also gain more control over plan design, which can help attract and retain talent in competitive job markets.
However, level-funded health care is not without challenges. It requires careful planning and a solid understanding of risk. Employers must be prepared for the possibility that claims may exceed projections, although stop-loss insurance helps mitigate this. Additionally, level-funded plans may not be suitable for very small groups or those with high-risk populations, as the cost of stop-loss coverage can be prohibitive.
Regulatory considerations also play a role. Level-funded plans are typically governed by federal ERISA laws rather than state insurance regulations, which can affect compliance and reporting requirements. Employers should work closely with benefits consultants or brokers to ensure they understand the legal landscape and choose a plan that aligns with their goals.
In conclusion, level-funded health care offers a compelling alternative for businesses seeking to manage costs while providing quality coverage. By combining predictability with the potential for savings and customization, it empowers employers to take a more active role in their health benefits strategy. As the health care landscape continues to evolve, level-funded plans are likely to remain a valuable option for organizations looking to strike the right balance between affordability and employee well-being.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
What Medical School Didn’t Teach Doctors About Money
Medical school is designed to mold students into competent, compassionate physicians. It teaches anatomy, pathology, pharmacology, and clinical skills with precision and rigor. Yet, despite the depth of medical knowledge imparted, one critical area is often overlooked: financial literacy. For many doctors, the transition from student to professional comes with a steep learning curve—not in medicine, but in money. From managing debt to understanding taxes, investing, and retirement planning, medical school leaves a financial education gap that can have long-term consequences.
The Debt Dilemma
One of the most glaring omissions in medical education is how to manage student loan debt. The average medical student graduates with over $200,000 in debt, yet few are taught how to navigate repayment options, interest accrual, or loan forgiveness programs. Many doctors enter residency with little understanding of income-driven repayment plans or Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), missing opportunities to reduce their financial burden. Without guidance, some make costly mistakes—such as refinancing federal loans prematurely or choosing repayment plans that don’t align with their career trajectory.
Income ≠ Wealth
Medical students often assume that a high salary will automatically lead to financial security. While physicians do earn more than most professionals, income alone doesn’t guarantee wealth. Medical school rarely addresses the importance of budgeting, saving, and investing. As a result, many doctors fall into the “HENRY” trap—High Earner, Not Rich Yet. They spend lavishly, assuming their income will always cover expenses, only to find themselves living paycheck to paycheck. Without a solid financial foundation, even high earners can struggle to build net worth.
***
***
Taxes and Business Skills
Doctors are also unprepared for the complexities of taxes. Whether employed by a hospital or running a private practice, physicians face unique tax challenges. Medical school doesn’t teach how to track deductible expenses, optimize retirement contributions, or navigate self-employment taxes. For those who open their own clinics, the lack of business education is even more pronounced. Understanding profit margins, payroll, insurance billing, and compliance regulations is essential—but rarely covered in medical training.
Investing and Retirement Planning
Another blind spot is investing. Medical students are rarely taught the basics of compound interest, asset allocation, or retirement accounts. Many don’t know the difference between a Roth IRA and a traditional 401(k), or how to evaluate mutual funds and index funds. This lack of knowledge delays retirement planning and can lead to missed opportunities for long-term growth. Some doctors rely on financial advisors without understanding the fees or conflicts of interest involved, putting their wealth at risk.
Insurance and Risk Management
Medical school also fails to educate students on insurance—life, disability, malpractice, and health. Doctors need robust coverage to protect their income and assets, but many don’t know how to evaluate policies or understand terms like “own occupation” or “elimination period.” Inadequate coverage can leave physicians vulnerable to financial disaster in the event of illness, injury, or litigation.
Emotional and Behavioral Finance
Beyond technical knowledge, medical school overlooks the emotional side of money. Physicians often face pressure to maintain a certain lifestyle, especially after years of sacrifice. The desire to “catch up” can lead to impulsive spending, luxury purchases, and financial stress. Without tools to manage money mindset and behavioral habits, doctors may struggle with guilt, anxiety, or burnout related to finances.
The Case for Financial Education
Fortunately, awareness of this gap is growing. Organizations like Medics’ Money and podcasts such as “Docs Outside the Box” are working to fill the void by offering financial education tailored to physicians.
These resources cover everything from budgeting and debt management to investing and entrepreneurship. Some medical schools are beginning to incorporate financial literacy into their curricula, but progress is slow and inconsistent.
Conclusion
Medical school equips doctors to save lives, but it doesn’t prepare them to secure their own financial future. The lack of financial education leaves many physicians vulnerable to debt, poor investment decisions, and lifestyle inflation. To thrive both professionally and personally, doctors must seek out financial knowledge beyond the classroom. Whether through self-study, mentorship, or professional guidance, understanding money is as essential as understanding medicine. After all, financial health is a cornerstone of overall well-being—and every doctor deserves to master both.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Turning 65 is often seen as the gateway to retirement—a time to slow down, reflect, and enjoy the fruits of decades of labor. But for some, including doctors who may have faced financial setbacks, poor planning, or unexpected life events, reaching this milestone without financial security can be deeply unsettling. The image of a broke 65-year-old doctor may seem paradoxical, given the profession’s reputation for high earnings. Yet, reality paints a more nuanced picture. Fortunately, even in the face of financial hardship, retirement is not a closed door—it’s a challenge that can be met with creativity, resilience, and strategic planning.
Understanding the Situation
Before exploring solutions, it’s important to understand how a physician might arrive at retirement age without adequate savings. Medical school debt, late career starts, divorce, health issues, poor investment decisions, or supporting family members can all contribute. Some doctors work in lower-paying specialties or underserved areas, sacrificing income for impact. Others may have lived beyond their means, assuming their high salary would always be enough. Regardless of the cause, the key is to shift focus from regret to action.
Traditional retirement—ceasing work entirely—is not the only option. For a broke 65-year-old doctor, retirement may mean transitioning to a less demanding role, reducing hours, or shifting to a new field. The goal is to create a sustainable lifestyle that balances income, purpose, and well-being.
Leveraging Medical Expertise
Even if full-time clinical practice is no longer viable, a physician’s knowledge remains valuable. Here are several ways to continue earning while easing into retirement:
Telemedicine: Remote consultations are in high demand, especially in primary care, psychiatry, and chronic disease management. Telemedicine offers flexibility, reduced overhead, and the ability to work from home.
Locum Tenens: Temporary assignments can fill staffing gaps in hospitals and clinics. These roles often pay well and allow for travel or seasonal work.
Medical Writing and Reviewing: Physicians can write for journals, websites, or pharmaceutical companies. Peer reviewing, editing, and content creation are viable options.
Teaching and Mentoring: Medical schools, nursing programs, and residency programs need experienced educators. Adjunct teaching or mentoring can be fulfilling and financially helpful.
Consulting: Doctors can advise healthcare startups, legal teams, or insurance companies. Their insights are valuable in product development, litigation, and policy.
Exploring Non-Clinical Opportunities
Some physicians may wish to pivot entirely. Transferable skills—critical thinking, communication, leadership—open doors in other industries:
Health Coaching or Life Coaching: With certification, doctors can guide clients in wellness, stress management, or career transitions.
Entrepreneurship: Starting a small business, such as a tutoring service, online course, or specialty clinic, can generate income and autonomy.
Real Estate or Investing: With careful planning, investing in rental properties or learning about the stock market can create passive income.
Maximizing Government and Community Resources
At 65, individuals become eligible for Medicare, which can significantly reduce healthcare costs. Additionally, Social Security benefits may be available, depending on work history. While delaying benefits until age 70 increases monthly payments, some may need to claim earlier to meet immediate needs.
***
***
Other resources include:
Supplemental Security Income (SSI): For those with limited income and assets.
SNAP (food assistance) and LIHEAP (energy assistance): These programs help cover basic living expenses.
Community Organizations: Nonprofits and religious groups often provide support with housing, transportation, and social engagement.
Downsizing and Budgeting
Reducing expenses is a powerful way to stretch limited resources. Consider:
Relocating: Moving to a lower-cost area or state with favorable tax policies can reduce housing and living expenses.
Selling Assets: A large home, unused vehicle, or collectibles may be converted into cash.
Shared Housing: Living with family, roommates, or in co-housing communities can cut costs and reduce isolation.
Minimalist Living: Prioritizing needs over wants and embracing simplicity can lead to financial and emotional freedom.
Creating a realistic budget is essential. Track income and expenses, eliminate unnecessary costs, and prioritize essentials. Free budgeting tools and financial counseling services can help.
Financial stress can take a toll on mental health. It’s important to cultivate resilience and maintain a sense of purpose. Strategies include:
Staying Active: Physical activity improves mood and health. Walking, yoga, or swimming are low-cost options.
Volunteering: Giving back can provide structure, community, and fulfillment.
Learning New Skills: Online courses, hobbies, or certifications can reignite passion and open new doors.
Building a Support Network: Friends, family, and peer groups offer emotional support and practical advice.
Planning for the Future
Even at 65, it’s not too late to plan. Consider:
Debt Management: Negotiate payment plans, consolidate loans, or seek professional help.
Estate Planning: Create a will, designate healthcare proxies, and organize important documents.
Insurance Review: Ensure adequate coverage for health, life, and long-term care.
Financial Advising: A fee-only advisor can help create a sustainable plan without selling products.
Embracing a New Chapter
Retirement is not a destination—it’s a transition. For a broke 65-year-old doctor, it may not look like the glossy brochures, but it can still be rich in meaning. By leveraging experience, reducing expenses, accessing resources, and nurturing well-being, retirement becomes a journey of reinvention.In many ways, doctors are uniquely equipped for this challenge. They’ve faced long hours, high stakes, and complex problems. That same grit and adaptability can guide them through financial hardship and into a fulfilling retirement.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Population health and public health are two interrelated disciplines that strive to enhance the health outcomes of communities. While they share a common mission—to reduce health disparities and promote wellness—their approaches, target populations, and operational frameworks differ significantly.
***
***
Public health is traditionally defined as the science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life, and promoting health through organized efforts and informed choices of society, organizations, public and private sectors, communities, and individuals. It focuses on the health of the general population and emphasizes broad interventions such as vaccination programs, sanitation, health education, and policy advocacy. Public health professionals often work in government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and academic institutions to implement community-wide initiatives that prevent disease and promote healthy behaviors.
***
***
In contrast, population health takes a more targeted approach. It refers to the health outcomes of a specific group of individuals, including the distribution of such outcomes within the group. This field is particularly concerned with the social determinants of health—factors like income, education, environment, and access to care—that influence health disparities. Population health strategies often involve data-driven interventions tailored to the needs of defined groups, such as rural communities, ethnic minorities, or patients with chronic conditions.
One key distinction lies in scope and granularity. Public health initiatives are typically designed for the entire population, aiming to create systemic change. For example, anti-smoking campaigns or water fluoridation programs benefit everyone regardless of individual risk. Population health, however, might focus on reducing diabetes rates among Hispanic adults in a specific urban area, using targeted outreach and culturally sensitive care models.
Another difference is in data utilization. Population health relies heavily on health informatics and analytics to identify trends, allocate resources, and evaluate outcomes. This evidence-based approach supports precision in addressing health inequities. Public health also uses data, but often at a broader level to guide policy and monitor general health indicators like life expectancy or disease prevalence.
Despite these differences, the two fields are complementary. Public health lays the foundation for healthy societies through preventive infrastructure, while population health builds on this by addressing nuanced needs within subgroups. Together, they form a holistic framework for improving health outcomes across diverse communities.
In today’s healthcare landscape, the integration of public and population health is increasingly vital. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of both approaches: public health measures like mask mandates and vaccination campaigns were essential, while population health efforts ensured vulnerable groups received targeted support.
In conclusion, while public health and population health differ in focus and methodology, they are united by a shared goal: to foster healthier communities. Understanding their distinctions enables more effective collaboration and innovation in health policy, care delivery, and community engagement.
SPEAKING: ME-P Editor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
The U.S. healthcare system is often criticized for its high costs, unequal access, and inconsistent outcomes. With nearly 30 million Americans uninsured and many more underinsured, the question arises: could socialized medicine be the solution to these systemic issues?
Socialized medicine refers to a system where the government owns and operates healthcare facilities and employs medical professionals, funded primarily through taxation. While the term is often used pejoratively in American discourse, countries like the United Kingdom and Sweden have long embraced such models. These systems guarantee universal access to healthcare, regardless of income or employment status.
One of the strongest arguments in favor of socialized medicine is its potential to reduce overall healthcare costs. In the U.S., administrative expenses, profit margins, and fragmented billing systems contribute to exorbitant prices. A centralized system could streamline operations, negotiate better drug prices, and eliminate the need for private insurance middlemen. Countries with socialized systems typically spend less per capita on healthcare while achieving comparable or better health outcomes.
Moreover, socialized medicine could address the issue of healthcare access. In the current U.S. model, losing a job often means losing health insurance. Even with the Affordable Care Act, many Americans face high premiums and deductibles. A government-run system would ensure that healthcare is a right, not a privilege, and that no one is denied care due to financial constraints.
***
***
However, critics argue that socialized medicine could lead to longer wait times, reduced innovation, and lower quality of care. They point to examples in Canada and the U.K. where patients sometimes wait weeks or months for non-emergency procedures. Additionally, skeptics fear that government control could stifle competition and reduce incentives for medical advancement.
Yet, these concerns may be overstated. Many countries with socialized systems still foster innovation through public-private partnerships and maintain high standards of care. France, for example, combines universal coverage with private providers and consistently ranks among the top healthcare systems globally.
Transitioning to socialized medicine in the U.S. would be a monumental task, requiring political will, public support, and a reimagining of healthcare financing. It would disrupt entrenched interests, including insurance companies and pharmaceutical firms. But if the goal is to create a more equitable, efficient, and humane system, socialized medicine deserves serious consideration.
In conclusion, while not a panacea, socialized medicine offers a compelling framework for addressing the deep-rooted problems in U.S. healthcare. By prioritizing access, affordability, and public health over profit, it could pave the way for a healthier and more just society.
SPEAKING: ME-P Editor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Do you ever wish you could acquire specific information for your career activities without having to complete a university Master’s Degree or finish our entire Certified Medical Planner™ professional designation program? Well, Micro-Certifications from the Institute of Medical Business Advisors, Inc., might be the answer. Read on to learn how our three Micro-Certifications offer new opportunities for professional growth in the medical practice, business management, health economics and financial planning, investing and advisory space for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals.
Micro-Certification Basics
Stock-Brokers, Financial Advisors, Investment Advisors, Accountants, Consultants, Financial Analyists and Financial Planners need to enhance their knowledge skills to better serve the changing and challenging healthcare professional ecosystem. But, it can be difficult to learn and demonstrate mastery of these new skills to employers, clients, physicians or medical prospects. This makes professional advancement difficult. That’s where Micro-Certification and Micro-Credentialing enters the online educational space. It is the process of earning a Micro-Certification, which is like a mini-degree or mini-credential, in a very specific topical area.
Micro-Certification Requirements
Once you’ve completed all of the requirements for our Micro-Certification, you will be awarded proof that you’ve earned it. This might take the form of a paper or digital certificate, which may be a hard document or electronic image, transcript, file, or other official evidence that you’ve completed the necessary work.
Uses of Micro-Certifications
Micro-Certifications may be used to demonstrate to physicians prospective medical clients that you’ve mastered a certain knowledge set. Because of this, Micro-Certifications are useful for those financial service professionals seeking medical clients, employment or career advancement opportunities.
Examples of iMBA, Inc., Micro-Certifications
Here are the three most popular Micro-Certification course from the Institute of Medical Business Advisors, Inc:
1. Health Insurance and Managed Care: To keep up with the ever-changing field of health care physician advice, you must learn new medical practice business models in order to attract and assist physicians and nurse clients. By bringing together the most up-to-date business and medical prctice models [Medicare, Medicaid, PP-ACA, POSs, EPOs, HMOs, PPOs, IPA’s, PPMCs, Accountable Care Organizations, Concierge Medicine, Value Based Care, Physician Pay-for-Performance Initiatives, Hospitalists, Retail and Whole-Sale Medicine, Health Savings Accounts and Medical Unions, etc], this iMBA Inc., Mini-Certification offers a wealth of essential information that will help you understand the ever-changing practices in the next generation of health insurance and managed medical care.
2. Health Economics and Finance: Medical economics, finance, managerial and cost accounting is an integral component of the health care industrial complex. It is broad-based and covers many other industries: insurance, mathematics and statistics, public and population health, provider recruitment and retention, health policy, forecasting, aging and long-term care, and Venture Capital are all commingled arenas. It is essential knowledge that all financial services professionals seeking to serve in the healthcare advisory niche space should possess.
3. Health Information Technology and Security: There is a myth that all physician focused financial advisors understand Health Information Technology [HIT]. In truth, it is often economically misused or financially misunderstood. Moreover, an emerging national HIT architecture often puts the financial advisor or financial planner in a position of maximum uncertainty and minimum productivity regarding issues like: Electronic Medical Records [EMRs] or Electronic Health Records [EHRs], mobile health, tele-health or tele-medicine, Artificial Intelligence [AI], benefits managers and human resource professionals.
Other Topics include: economics, finance, investing, marketing, advertising, sales, start-ups, business plan creation, financial planning and entrepreneurship, etc.
How to Start Learning and Earning Recognition for Your Knowledge
Now that you’re familiar with Micro-Credentialing, you might consider earning a Micro-Certification with us. We offer 3 official Micro-Certificates by completing a one month online course, with a live instructor consisting of twelve asynchronous lessons/online classes [3/wk X 4/weeks = 12 classes]. The earned official completion certificate can be used to demonstrate mastery of a specific skill set and shared with current or future employers, current clients or medical niche financial advisory prospects.
Mini-Certification Tuition, Books and Related Fees
The tuition for each Mini-Certification live online course is $1,250 with the purchase of one required dictionary handbook. Other additional guides, white-papers, videos, files and e-content are all supplied without charge. Alternative courses may be developed in the future subject to demand and may change without notice.
***
Contact: For more information, or to speak with an academic representative, please contact Ann Miller RN MHA CMP™ at Email: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com [24/7].
Posted on October 17, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one’s expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true or apparently true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time. They result in “persistent contradiction between interdependent elements” leading to a lasting “unity of opposites”.
THE TELE-MEDICINE PARADOX
Classic Definition: Refers specifically to the treatment of various medical conditions without seeing the patient in person. Healthcare providers may use electronic and internet platforms like live video, audio, PCs, tablets, or instant messaging to address a patient’s concerns and diagnose their condition remotely.
Modern Circumstance: This may include giving medical advice, walking them through at-home exercises, or recommending them to a local provider or facility. Even more exciting is the emergence of telemedicine apps which give patients access to care right from their phones or computer screens.
Paradox Examples: Treating certain conditions remotely can be challenging. Tele-medicine is often used to treat common illnesses, manage chronic conditions, or provide specialist services. If a patient is dealing with an emergent or serious condition, the remote provider suggests they seek in-person medical care.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on October 8, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By A. I.
***
***
Value-Based Medical Care: A Paradigm Shift in Healthcare
In recent years, the healthcare industry has undergone a transformative shift from volume-driven services to outcome-focused care. This evolution is embodied in the concept of value-based medical care, a model that emphasizes delivering high-quality healthcare while controlling costs and improving patient outcomes. Unlike traditional fee-for-service systems, which reward providers for the quantity of services rendered, value-based care aligns incentives with the value of care provided—measured by patient health outcomes relative to the cost of achieving them.
Core Principles of Value-Based Care
At its heart, value-based medical care is built on several foundational principles:
Patient-Centeredness: Care is tailored to individual needs, preferences, and values, promoting shared decision-making and holistic treatment.
Quality Over Quantity: Providers are rewarded for improving health outcomes, reducing hospital readmissions, and preventing disease rather than performing more procedures.
Integrated Care Delivery: Coordination among healthcare professionals ensures seamless transitions between services, reducing fragmentation and duplication.
Data-Driven Accountability: Performance metrics and health analytics guide clinical decisions and track progress toward better outcomes.
Cost Efficiency: By focusing on prevention and effective management of chronic conditions, value-based care aims to reduce unnecessary spending.
Benefits for Patients and Providers
For patients, value-based care offers a more personalized and proactive approach to health. It encourages preventive screenings, chronic disease management, and wellness programs that lead to longer, healthier lives. Providers benefit from shared savings programs, performance bonuses, and stronger relationships with their patients. Moreover, healthcare systems can allocate resources more effectively, reducing waste and improving overall population health.
Posted on October 4, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
OVERHEARD IN THE DOCTOR’S LOUNGE
***
***
By D. Kellus Pruitt DDS
According to money journalists Max Tailwagger and Allan Roth of MoneyWatch, the trade publication Medical Economics Magazine [“advertising supplement”] nearly listed a dog on its’ 2013 list of Best Financial Advisors for Doctors. Indeed, being listed as a top financial advisor in this publication would enhance any advisor’s credibility as well as reach a high income readership.
For example, several advisors in the Financial Planning Association, mentions this prestigious award year after year. And, the NAPFA organization of fee-only financial planners has issued press releases when member advisors make this annual list. In fact, in 2008, it touted that 52/150 listed FAs were NAPFA members.
Yet, the dog is well known in the financial advisory world, having allegedly received a plaque as one of 2009 America’s Top Financial Planners by the Consumers’ Research Council of America, and has appeared in several books including Pound Foolish and Money for Life. The fee for Maxwell Tailwagger CFP® [a five year old Dachshund] was reported to be $750 with $1,000 for a bold listing. Colorado Securities Commissioner Fred Joseph is reported to have said, “Once again, Max is gaining national notoriety for his astute, and almost superhuman, abilities in the financial arena.”
The only two qualifications for the listing were to pay the fee and not have a complaint against them. In 2009, James Putman, then the NAPFA chairman who touted his own Medical Economics award, was charged by the SEC for securities fraud. NAPFA spokesperson Laura Fisher allegedly opined that “NAPFA no longer promotes the Medical Economics Top Advisors for Doctors list. We felt promoting a list that included stock-brokers was inconsistent with NAPFA’s mission to advance the fee-only profession.” When an advisor name drops an honor to you, congratulate him and then ask how s/he achieved the award. Ask how many nominees versus award recipients there were. What were the criteria for selection and how were they nominated. Ask if they had to pay for the honor, and go online to check out the organization.
Then ask yourself this question: If your financial advisor is buying credibility, do you really want to trust your financial future to him or her?
Classic: A pre-payment plan refers to health insurance plans that provide medical or hospital benefits in service rather than dollars, such as the plans offered by various Health Maintenance Organizations. A method providing in advance for the cost of predetermined benefits for a population group, through regular periodic payments in the form of premiums, dues, or contributions including those contributions that are made to a health and welfare fund by employers on behalf of their employees!
Modern: A Prepaid Group Practice Plan specifies health services are rendered by participating physicians to an enrolled group of persons, with a fixed periodic payment made in advance by (or on behalf of) each person or family. If a health insurance carrier is involved, a contract to pay in advance for the full range of health services to which the insured is entitled under the terms of the health insurance contract.
Examples:
Pre-Paid Hospital Service Plan: The common name for a health maintenance organization (HMO), a plan that provides comprehensive health care to its members, who pay a flat annual fee for services.
Pre-Paid Premium: An insurance or other premium payment paid prior to the due date. In insurance, payment by the insured of future premiums, through paying the present (discounted) value of the future premiums or having interest paid on the deposit.
Pre-Paid Prescription Plan: A drug reimbursement plan that is paid in advance.
Posted on October 1, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
BREAKING NEWS!
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SHUTS DOWN
***
By Health Capital Consultants, LLC
***
***
With hours to go until the midnight deadline on September 30th, 2025 to fund the government, lawmakers appear deadlocked over whether certain healthcare provisions should be included in the temporary funding bill.
Should this deadlock continue, the federal government will shut down beginning today October 1st and remain shut down until that deadlock is resolved.
This Health Capital Topics article provides an update on the developing saga. (Read more…)
Posted on September 27, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Staff Reporters
***
***
A paradox is a statement that appears at first to be contradictory, but upon reflection then makes sense. This literary device is commonly used to engage a reader to discover an underlying logic in a seemingly self-contradictory statement or phrase. As a result, paradox allows readers to understand concepts in a different and even non-traditional
***
***
GOVERNMENT HEALTH INFORMATION IS TRUSTED?
Classic Definition: Despite the PP-ACA, there is ambivalence about the role of the US Government as a source of quality healthcare information.
Modern Circumstance: Of brands presented to respondents in a Consumer Reports (50 percent), and AARP (37 percent) survey, they outpolled the “US Government Healthcare Quality Reporting Website” (36 percent) and Medicare Website (32 percent).
Paradox Example: The focus groups expressed “mixed reactions and raised doubts about government involvement in quality ratings information. At least one participant in each group expressed skepticism about trusting ‘the government’ to compile information.”
Younger consumers especially questioned the relevance of Medicare measures to the non-elderly population. Yet participants gravitated to “.gov” websites over “.org” websites as a more authoritative source.
CITE: Williams, Jason: Health Affairs, December 28, 2016
[An Internet WIKI CROWD-SOURCED Curation Project]*
To keep up with the ever-changing healthcare industrial complex, we must learn new definitions and re-learn old terminology in order to correctly apply it to practice. By aggregating the most up-to-date abbreviations, acronyms, definitions and terms, the Health DictionarySeries offers a wealth of information to help understand the ever-changing terms-of-art in healthcare today.
Each 10,000 item handbook is essential for doctors, nurses, benefits managers and insurance agents, CPAs, and administrators; as well as graduate and under graduate students and professors. Our goal to for each dictionary to be designated as a Doody’s Core Title.
Dictionary of Health Insurance and Managed Care
With more than 8,000 definitions, 4,000 abbreviations and acronyms, and a 3,000 item oeuvre of resources, readings, and nomenclature derivatives, this dictionary covers the Medicare, managed care and Medicaid, private insurance, Veteran’s Administration and PP-ACA language of the entire health and long-term care insurance sector.
Dictionary of Health Economics and Finance
Health economics and finance is an integral component of the health care industrial complex. Its language is a diverse and broad-based concept covering many other industries: accounting, mathematics, the actuarial sciences, stochastics and statistics, salary reimbursements, physician payments, compensation and forecasting are all commingled arenas.
Dictionary of Health Information Technology Security
There is a myth that all healthcare stakeholders understand the meaning of information technology jargon. In truth, the vernacular of contemporary systems is unique, and often misused or misunderstood. Moreover, emerging Heath Information Technology (HIT) thru the HITECG initiatives; in the guise of terms, definitions, acronyms, abbreviations and standards; often puts the non-expert in a position of maximum uncertainty and minimum productivity.
*NOTE: A wiki website allows users to add or update content using their browser thru a hosted server created by the collaborative effort of site visitors. The Hawaiian term “wiki wiki” means “super fast.”
Despite their high salaries, not all doctors are wealthy, and some live paycheck to paycheck. Here are 5 reasons why many doctors today are broke, according to https://medschoolinsiders.com
1 | Believing They Are Universally Smart
The first reason so many doctors are broke is that many doctors believe they are universally smart. While most doctors have deep specialized knowledge, there’s a big difference between being smart in your profession and being smart with money. A physician’s schooling is quite thorough when it comes to the human body, but med school doesn’t include a prerequisite class on how to handle finances.
Graduating medical school is a major feat and certainly demonstrates superior work ethic and cognitive abilities. But many new doctors believe these accomplishments transcend all aspects of life. If you’re smart enough to earn an MD, you’re certainly smart enough to handle your finances, but only once you properly and intentionally educate yourself.
The truth is doctors, especially traditional graduates, haven’t had an opportunity to manage large sums of money until they become fully trained attending physicians and start pulling in low to mid six figures in income. Prior to that, there was very little of it to manage.
Far too many aspiring doctors, and students in general, don’t take the time to learn financial basics, in part because it’s uncomfortable and seems like something they can figure out “later”, whenever that may be. Their poor spending habits and lack of investment knowledge carry over into their careers, causing many to make irresponsible decisions.
The second factor is overspending too soon, and this comes up at two points in training.
First, it’s natural to want to start spending more as soon as you get into residency and start making a little more money. After all, you’ve been a broke student for 8 or more years, and now you’re finally making a reasonable and reliable wage. But that’s where young doctors get into trouble. Residency pays, but not nearly as much as you will be making once you become an attending physician. The average resident makes about $60K a year, and if you begin spending all of that money right away, thinking you’ll handle your loans once you become an attending, you delay paying off your medical school debt, which means the compounding effect through your student loan interest rate works against you.
Now that $250,000 in student loans has ballooned to over $350,000 by the time you finish residency. The compounding effect, which can be one of your greatest allies in your financial life, becomes an equally powerful enemy when working against you through debt. But of course, pinching pennies is easier said than done, especially when you’re in residency and are surrounded by peers in different professions. They’ve been earning good money much longer than you have, and they can afford more luxurious lifestyles.
They may not be worried about indulging in fine dining or how much a hotel costs when traveling. Students in college and medical school are often confident they will resist the temptations, but the desire to keep up with your friends and family can be difficult to ignore, which causes many to overspend before they technically have the money to do so.
The same is true of attending physicians. As soon as those six-figure salaries come rolling in, many physicians go overboard with spending, trying to make up for lost time and to treat yourself.
Now, we are not suggesting you shouldn’t reward yourself for completing residency, but that reward shouldn’t be a Lamborghini. It’s best to continue living like a resident in your first few years after becoming an attending to pay off loans, put a down payment on a home, and get your financial foundation built before loosening the purse strings.
3 | Decreasing Salaries
Third, doctors continue to make less money than they did before. And this includes nearly all 44 medical specialties. For example, while physician compensation technically rose from $343k to $391k between 2017 and 2022, this rise does not keep up with inflation. The real average compensation in 2022 was less than $325k—a $20k decrease in purchasing power in only six years.
For doctors who are already spending to the limits of their salaries with huge mortgages, car payments, business costs, and other luxuries, a decreased salary can have a huge impact. You might be able to cut back by going on fewer vacations or eating out less frequently, but many accrued costs are locked in, such as a mortgage payment, car loan, or leased rental space for your practice.
4 | Increasing Costs of Private Practice
In the past, running a private practice was much simpler, but recent stricter guidelines and regulations have made it difficult for solo practices to keep up. While regulations like the Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act, or HIPAA, and mandatory Electronic Medical Records, or EMRs, are necessary to protect patients, they make costs higher for physicians who run their own private practice. These physicians need to spend their own money to set up and maintain EMRs as well as invest in security to ensure patient data is protected.
With the steep rise of inflation we’ve seen over the past couple of years, everything is more expensive, which means costs, such as business space, equipment, and even office supplies, have gone up for private practice physicians while salaries have not. 2013 to 2020 saw an annual inflation rate of anywhere from 0.7% to 2.3%. This skyrocketed to an annual inflation rate of 7.0% in 2021 and another 6.5% in 2022. In fact, the cost of running a private practice has increased by almost 40% between 2001 and 2021.
These increased costs are exacerbated by another problem plaguing private practices; decreased reimbursement. While costs increased by almost 40%, Medicare reimbursement only increased by 11%. When doctors see patients who are insured, the insurance companies pay the physicians for their time. For Medicare, the new proposed rules for 2023 would cut reimbursement by around 5%. When adjusting for inflation, Medicare reimbursement decreased by 20% in the last 20 years.
These costs add up, making it extremely difficult for physicians to thrive financially while running a private practice.
5 | Tuition Debt
Lastly, we can’t talk about a doctor’s finances without mentioning the exorbitant debt so many graduating physicians are left with. It won’t shock you to hear that med school is expensive. Extremely expensive. The average cost of tuition for a single year is nearly $60k, with significant variance from school to school, and that’s before accounting for living expenses.
In-state applicants pay less than out-of-state applicants, and students at private schools typically pay more than students at public medical schools. The astronomical costs mean the vast majority of students can’t pay for medical school out of their own pockets. And unless your family is part of the 1%, even with your parents footing the bill, it’s difficult to cover tuition, let alone rent, groceries, transportation, tech, social activities, exam fees, and application costs.
The average total student debt after college and med school is over $250k. But keep in mind that’s the average, which includes 27% of students who graduate with no debt at all. This means the vast majority of students leave medical school owing much more than $250k.
For some perspective, in 1978, the average debt for graduating MDs was $13,500, which, when adjusted for inflation, is a little over $60,000. There are multiple ways to eventually repay these loans, but time and discipline are essential to ensure this money is paid off as quickly as possible.
According to financial advisor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MEd MBA CMP™; consider the following:
Place a portion of your salary (15-20% or more) into a savings account, and another portion (10-20% or more) into wise investments [stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and/or ETFs].
Pay off your bills each month, and then use leftover spending money to purchase fun things like vacations and fancy dinners, within your means. Shop sales, buy used clothes, and use credit card points for travel.
Hire an excellent tax professional and meet with an investment advisor once or twice a year about your investment status and strategy. http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Capitation is a type of healthcare payment system in which a physician or hospital is paid a fixed amount of money per patient for a prescribed period by an insurer or physician association. The cost is based on the expected healthcare utilization costs for a group of patients for that year.
With capitation, the physician—otherwise known as the primary care physician— is paid a set amount for each enrolled patient whether a patient seeks care or not. The PCP is usually contracted with an HMO whose role it is to recruit patients.
According to Richard Eskow, CEO of Health Knowledge Systems of Los Angeles, capitated medical reimbursement has been used in one form or another, in every attempt at healthcare reform since the Norman Conquest. Some even say an earlier variant existed in ancient China [personal communication].
Initially, when Henry I assumed the throne of the newly combined kingdoms of England and Normandy, he initiated a sweeping set of healthcare reforms. Historical documents, though muddled, indicate that soon thereafter at least one “physician,” John of Essex, received a flat payment honorarium of one penny per day for his efforts. Historian Edward J. Kealey opined that sum was roughly equal to that paid to a foot-soldier or a blind person. Clearer historical evidence suggests that American doctors in the mid-19th century were receiving capitation-like payments. No less an authoritative figure than Mark Twain, in fact, is on record as saying that during his boyhood in Hannibal, MO his parents paid the local doctor $25/year for taking care of the entire family regardless of their state of health.
Later, Sidney Garfield MD [1905-1984] is noted as one of the great under-appreciated geniuses of 20th century American medicine stood in the shadow cast by his more celebrated partner, Henry J. Kaiser. Garfield was not the first physician to embrace the notion of prepayment capitation, nor was he the first to understand that physicians working together in multi-specialty groups could, through collaboration and continuity of care, outperform their solo practice colleagues in almost every measure of quality and efficiency. The Mayo brothers, of course, had prior claim to that distinction. What Garfield did, was marry prepayment to group practice, providing aligned financial incentives across every physician and specialty in his medical group, as well as a culture of group accountability for the care of every member of the affiliated health plan. He called it “the new economics of medicine,” and at its heart was a fundamentally new paradigm of care that emphasized – prevention before treatment – and health before sickness. Under his model: the fewer the sick – the greater the remuneration. And: the less serious the illness, the better off the patient and the doctors.
Such ideas were heresy to the reigning fee-for-service, solo practice, ideologues of the mainstream medical establishment of the 1940s and ‘50s, of course. Throughout the period, Garfield and his group physicians were routinely castigated by leaders of the AMA and county medical associations as socialistic and unethical. The local medical associations in Garfield’s expanding service areas – the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Portland, Oregon – blocked group practice physicians from association membership, effectively shutting them out of local hospitals, denying them patient referrals or specialty society accreditation. Twice in the 1940s, formal medical association charges were brought against Garfield personally, at one time temporarily succeeding in suspending his license to practice medicine.
Of course, capitation payments made a comeback in the first cost-cutting managed care era of the 1980-90s because fee-for-service medicine created perverse incentives for physicians by paying more for treating illnesses and injuries than it does for preventing them — or even for diagnosing them early and reducing the need for intensive treatment later. Nevertheless, the modern managed care industry’s experience with capitation wasn’t initially a good one. The 1980-90s saw a number of HMOs attempt to put independent physicians, especially primary care doctors, into a capitation reimbursement model. The result was often negative for patients, who found that their doctors were far less willing to see them — and saw them for briefer visits — when they were receiving no additional income for their effort. Attempts were also made to aggregate various types of health providers — including hospitals and physicians in multiple specialties — into “capitation groups” that were collectively responsible for delivering care to a defined patient group. These included healthcare facilities and medical providers of all types: physicians, osteopaths, podiatrists, dentists, optometrists, pharmacies, physical therapists, hospitals and skilled nursing homes, etc.
However, the healthcare industry isn’t collective by nature, and these efforts tended to be too complicated to succeed. One lesson that these experiments taught is that provider behavior is difficult to change unless the relationship between that behavior and its consequences is fairly direct and easy to understand.
Today, the concept of prepayment and medical capitation is to uncouple compensation from the actual number of patients seen, or treatments and interventions performed. This is akin to a fixed price restaurant menu, as opposed to an àla carte eatery.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on September 14, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
BREAKING NEWS
Law enforcement officials in Utah released a video of the suspected shooter in the assassination of Turning Point USA co-founder and CEO Charlie Kirk, saying that the person wore Converse tennis shoes and left a hand print and a shoe print at the scene.
The suspect in Charlie Kirk’s assassination has been identified as Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old Utah resident. Law enforcement sources told the Daily Mail that Robinson was taken into custody as the alleged assassin who killed Kirk at a rally at Utah Valley University on Wednesday.
Before today, forensic podiatry has even made it into the public zeitgeist with the hit TV show “Bones” which premiered on September 13, 2005, and concluded on March 28, 2017, airing for 246 episodes over 12 seasons. The show was based on forensic anthropology and forensic archaeology, with each episode focusing on the mystery behind human body remains brought in for examination and identification.
In one show, eight pairs of dismembered feet washed ashore after a flood on the U.S.-Canada border, but things didn’t add up when only seven pairs of feet were identified as research corpses from a nearby university body farm.
When the fictional Canadian forensic podiatrist Dr. Douglas Filmore took the remains back to Canada, he had to form a jurisdictional alliance with the United States to match the pairs of feet and identify the victims. A rare and expensive pair of sneakers led the team to the victim’s murderer.
In 2016, an actual forensic podiatry club was started at the Barry University School of Podiatric Medicine. And, a formal class covering aspects of forensic podiatry is held at the New York College of Podiatric Medicine. Students exit the class with an in depth knowledge of forensic podiatry and other legal knowledge applicable to current cases.
More expertly, real-life colleague Michael Steven Nirenberg DPMactually testified in the murder trial of defendants Kailie Brackett and Donnell Dana with the state calling three witnesses to testify, including the podiatrist who claimed Brackett’s footprints match the ones found in blood at the apartment of the victim, Kimberly Neptune. The forensic podiatrist focused on the footprints discovered at Neptune’s apartment, using prints and images of the defendant’s feet taken by law enforcement. After study, he claimed the prints at the scene bore a resemblance to Kailie Brackett’s in the width of the foot. The defense questioned the field of forensic podiatry and pressed Dr. Nirenberg on whether the measurements would be altered depending on how thick the sock covering the foot was woven.
Dr. Nirenberg was also interviewed on National Public Radio’s Morning Edition on April 14th 2023 about the gait of the bombing suspect associated with the capital riot on Wednesday January 6th, 2021. Dr. Nirenberg is president of the American Society of Forensic Podiatry and co-editor of the textbook: “Forensic Gait Analysis: Principles and Practice”. The bombing suspect had placed bombs at the DNC and RNC headquarters in Washington, DC on the night before. NPR asked Dr. Nirenberg to comment on the features of the person’s gait.
Additionally, Nirenberg was interviewed by Nancy Grace on her TV show Crime Stories. Grace interviewed Nirenberg about his forensic podiatry work in helping to solve the murder of a mother of 3 who was killed in a church. The case remains unsolved. The episode, “Fitness-Mom Missy Bevers Bludgeoned Dead in Creekside Church” aired June 6th, 2024 and is available online at Merit+ TV.
And, Netflix’s 2023 docu-series, “Till Murder Do Us Part”, recounts the killings of Derek and Nancy Haysom by including a series of interviews with a cast of real people. The four-part docu-series revolves around the unpacking of how a wealthy couple was murdered in Virginia in 1985. It also focuses on how the suspects, Elizabeth Haysom, and her boyfriend, Jens Soehring, betrayed each other during the trial. Dr. Sarah Reel DPM was the forensic podiatrist who was involved with Jens’ and Elizabeth’s footprint examination. Dr. Reel pointed out that, statistically, there was no difference “between a bare footprint and a socked footprint.” The doctor suggested that Jens’ reference footprint matched closely with the crime scene footprint.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on September 10, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
DEFINITIONS
By Staff Reporters
***
***
Rate Review & the 80/20 Rule
The health care law provides 2 ways to hold insurance companies accountable and help keep your costs down: Rate Review and the 80/20 rule.
Rate Review
Rate Review helps protect you from unreasonable rate increases. Insurance companies must now publicly explain any rate increase of 15% or more before raising your premium. This does not apply to grandfathered plans.
The 80/20 Rule generally requires insurance companies to spend at least 80% of the money they take in from premiums on health care costs and quality improvement activities. The other 20% can go to administrative, overhead, and marketing costs.
The 80/20 rule is sometimes known as Medical Loss Ratio, or MLR. If an insurance company uses 80 cents out of every premium dollar to pay for your medical claims and activities that improve the quality of care, the company has a Medical Loss Ratio of 80%.
Insurance companies selling to large groups (usually more than 50 employees) must spend at least 85% of premiums on care and quality improvement.
If your insurance company doesn’t meet these requirements, you’ll get a rebate on part of the premium that you paid.
Will I get a rebate check from my insurance company?
If your insurance company doesn’t meet its 80/20 targets for the year, you’ll get back some of the premium that you paid.
You may see the rebate in a number of ways:
A rebate check in the mail
A lump-sum deposit into the same account that was used to pay the premium, if you paid by credit card or debit card
A direct reduction in your future premium
Your employer may also use one of the above rebate methods, or apply the rebate in a way that benefits employees
If you or your employer will get a rebate, your insurance company must notify you by August 1.
If you have an individual insurance policy, you’ll get the rebate directly from your insurance company.
For small group and large group plans, the rebate is usually paid to the employer. It may use one of the above rebate methods, or apply the rebate in a way that benefits employees.
FYI: The 80/20 rebate rules don’t apply when an insurance company has fewer than 1000 enrollees in a particular state or market.
For Rate Review: These requirements don’t apply to grandfathered plans. Check your plan’s materials or ask your employer or your benefits administrator to find out if your health plan is grandfathered.
For the 80/20 Rule: These rights apply to all individual, small group, and large group health plans, whether your plan is grandfathered or not.
Classic: The portion of medical expenses a patient is responsible for paying.
Modern: Refers to the maximum you will pay during your policy period, which is typically a year, before your plan starts to pay 100% of your allowed amount. The costs of your deductible, co-pay, and co-insurance are included here, but not your premium.
Classic: “Out-of-network” health care providers do not have an agreement with your insurance company to provide care. While insurance companies may have some out-of-network benefits, medical care from an out-of-network provider will usually cost more out-of-pocket than an in-network provider.
Modern: The amount that a health care insurance plan will contribute toward out-of-network services will vary by your insurance company and is often based on a “reasonable and customary” amount that the service should cost
Example: If you go to an out-of-network dentist and are billed $300 for the service, your insurance company may contribute $200 toward paying this cost because $200 is the amount it has decided is “reasonable and customary” for this service. When out-of-network, any remaining cost above this amount ($100 in this case) may have to be fully covered by the person receiving care. When out-of-network, the usual coinsurance rates that apply in-network may not apply out-of-network. Additionally, out-of-network service costs may not count toward an annual deductible.
According to Medical Economics, there were 10 clinic and physician practices filing bankruptcy in 2024, making it the highest level of the last six years, according to a new analysis of cases with liabilities of at least $10 million.
Meanwhile, the Steward Health Care System bankruptcy, which was based in Massachusetts but making headlines across the nation, has become “the largest hospital sector bankruptcy by far in the last 30 years,” according to a new analysis by Gibbins Advisors, based in Nashville, Tennessee.
Health care bankruptcy filings totaled 57 last year, down from 79 in 2023, said “Healthcare Restructuring: Trends and Outlook.” The report analyzed Chapter 11 health care bankruptcy cases with liabilities of at least $10 million, since 2019.
Last year’s total was down 28% from 2023’s peak, but greater than the 2019 to 2022 average of 42 filings a year, the report said.
Bankruptcy, often considered a last financial resort, is a legal process that can help alleviate outstanding debts for individuals and businesses. Reasons to file for bankruptcy can include divorce, job loss, exorbitant medical bills or credit card debt.
There are several types of bankruptcy — six, as a matter of fact. The two most common types of bankruptcy for individuals are Chapter 7 and Chapter 13.
But there are four other types as well: Chapter 9, Chapter 11, Chapter 12 and Chapter 15. And, the type of bankruptcy filed depends on the situation.
Regardless of which type, the process is typically the same: You’ll usually retain an attorney and make your case before a judge, who will then erase some debts or set up a repayment plan.
Also note that an eligibility requirement — for all bankruptcy chapters — is that you must undergo credit counseling within the 180 days before filing.
Posted on September 7, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Health Capital Consultants, LLC
***
***
A recent study of hospital physician acquisition and employment found that such acquisitions decrease competition and raise prices. A National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper, released in July 2025, “empirically analyze[d] the effects of mergers between complementary firms on competition and pricing,” and found hospital prices increased by an average of 3.3%, while physician prices increased by an average of 15.1%.
This Health Capital Topics article reviews the study’s findings and implications for the healthcare industry. (Read more…)
Posted on September 5, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
U.S. Department for Health & Human Services & Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
By Health Capital Consultants, LLC
***
***
On August 21, 2025, the U.S. Department for Health & Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the formation of a new Healthcare Advisory Committee.
The Committee is expected to be comprised of a group of experts who will make strategic recommendations to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz.
This Health Capital Topics article discusses this announcement and potential implications on the healthcare industry. (Read more…)
Posted on September 3, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System
***
***
By Health Capital Consultants, LLC
On July 31, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its finalized payment and policy updates for the Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and the Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) Prospective Payment System (PPS) for fiscal year (FY) 2026.
The final rule authorized Medicare inpatient reimbursement increases for 2026 and moved forward with improvements to quality measurement, and provided more information on a new value-based payment model.
This Health Capital Topics article will discuss the IPPS final rule and stakeholder reactions. (Read more…)
A silent, non-directed, ghost, blind, faux, or “mirror” PPO, HMO, or other provider model is not really a formalized managed care organization [MCO] at all. Rather, it was simply an intermediary attempt, and Ponzi-like scheme, to negotiate practitioner fees downward, by promising a higher volume of patients in exchange for the discount.
Of course, the intermediary [discount-broker] then resells the packaged contract product to any willing insurance company, HMO, PPO or other payer, thereby pocketing the difference as a nice profit. Sometime, these virtual organizations are just indemnity companies in disguise.
NOTE: The term indemnity insurance refers to an insurance policy that compensates an insured party for certain unexpected damages or losses up to a certain limit—usually the amount of the loss itself. Insurance companies provide coverage in exchange for premiums paid by the insured parties.
These policies are commonly designed to protect professionals and business owners when they are found to be at fault for a specific event such as misjudgment or malpractice. They generally take the form of a letter o indemnity.
***
As part of a silent PPO scheme, insurers try to pass off the discount as legitimate on Explanation of Benefit [EOB] forms. Physicians should not fall for this ploy, since pricing pressure will be forced even lower in the next round of “real” PPO negotiations!
Medical providers should also be on guard for silent HMOs, MCOs and any other silent insurance variation, since these virtual organizations do not exist, except as exploitable arbitrage situations for the middleman.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
It is normal for physician litigants to develop a case of “buyer’s remorse” after any mediation or divorce settlement. They may feel disappointed after entering into a settlement agreement or feel that they received a bad deal.
Mediation: Some advantages of divorce mediation over divorce litigation include:
◊ Mediation is generally faster and less costly.
◊ Mediation is voluntary, private and confidential.
◊ Mediation facilitates creative and realistic solutions.
◊ Mediation allows parties to control their agreements.
◊ Mediation eliminates a win-lose atmosphere and result.
◊ Mediation provides a forum for addressing future disputes.
◊ Mediation fosters communication and helps mend relationships.
***
***
Settlement
And so, in a vast majority of cases, mediation and settlement is probably a good deal. In fact, it is probably a great deal because you are receiving something without having to risk losing. Remember, trial can be a crap-shoot, and nothing is worse than losing it all at the time of trial.
Bench trial verdict by a trial judge.
Jury trial verdict by your “peers.”
Instead, you entered into a settlement agreement and now your divorce case is over.
But beware since trying to get out of a settlement agreement reached at mediation or settlement is virtually impossible.
Why? Well, there is a strong interest by the court to enforce mediation and settlement agreements. The court wants your divorce case to be over and off its docket. There are a few very narrow exceptions; for example, if one party was truly coerced because someone held a gun to their head. But that rarely happens, and it certainly doesn’t happen to most doctors or dentists.
Of course, you can fight against your mediation or settlement agreement if you like, but you won’t get too far. There’s an old adage in the law that a bad settlement is better than a great trial. That’s because no one knows how a judge or jury will rule come time of trial.
***
***
This buyers remorse phenomenon also isn’t uncommon among people who receive sudden wealth, whether through divorce settlements, inheritances, lottery winnings, or other windfalls.
Assessment
Financial advisors often see clients struggle with “sudden wealth syndrome”—the inability to properly manage a large sum of money they’re not accustomed to having.
Common mistakes include:
Lifestyle inflation without sustainable income to support it.
Poor investment decisions or lack of investment planning.
Emotional spending following traumatic life events like divorce.
Failure to set aside money for taxes on the settlement.
Not creating a long-term financial plan for the money.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
An important component of hospital credit analysis is essentiality. Hospitals are unusual businesses that many times possess some form of essentiality to their communities. Health care is important to the economic vitality of every community. Many hospitals have served their communities for many years; it is not uncommon to find hospitals that have been continuously operating for more than 100 years in the same community.
Most hospitals are not-for-profit. In not-for-profit hospitals, no private party actually “owns” the hospital; control is vested in various boards, but no one explicitly owns a not-for-profit hospital. In a broad sense, communities own not-for-profit hospitals. They are considered “charities” with a “charitable purpose.” Though a not-for-profit hospital may not have owners, it has many “stakehold-ers,” parties that have vested interests in the continuing success of the hospital.
Many hospitals have broad and vast webs of stakeholders. Stakeholders are why hospitals rarely close or are shut down. Too many stakeholders have interests in the continuing successful operation of hospitals.
Another dimension of the essentiality analysis is service analysis. How significant are the hospital’s services? If the hospital shuts down, what population segments would suffer? How significant is the population that would suffer? How much would they suffer?
And so, hospital stakeholder relationships need to be considered in the analysis of essentiality. How strong are these relations? How many are there? How important is the continuing success of this hospital to these stakeholders?
Analysis of hospital’s stakeholders and services should provide a credible view of the degree of essentiality associated with a hospital. Higher degrees of essentiality suggest higher likelihoods that hospitals, one way or another, will meet their commitments, particularly their payment commitments.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
An obstetrician-gynecologist, or OB-GYN, has expertise in female reproductive health, pregnancy, and childbirth. Some OB-GYNs offer a wide range of general health services similar to a primary care doctor. Others focus on the medical care of the female reproductive system. OB-GYNs also provide routine medical services and preventive screenings. This type of doctor has studied obstetrics and gynecology. The term “OB-GYN” can refer to the doctor, an obstetrician-gynecologist, or to the sciences that the doctor specializes in, which are obstetrics and gynecology.
Obstetrician
Obstetrics is the branch of medicine related to medical and surgical care before, during, and after a woman gives birth. Obstetrics focuses on caring for and maintaining a woman’s overall health during maternity. This includes:
pregnancy
labor
childbirth
the postpartum period
OB-GYNs can conduct office visits, perform surgery, and assist with labor and delivery. Some OB-GYNs provide services through a solo or private practice. Others do so as part of a larger medical group or hospital.
***
***
Gynecologist
Gynecology is the branch of medicine that focuses on women’s bodies and their reproductive health. It includes the diagnosis, treatment, and care of women’s reproductive system. This includes the:
vagina
uterus
ovaries
fallopian tubes
This branch of medicine also includes screening for and treating issues associated with women’s breasts. Gynecology is the overarching field of women’s health from puberty through adulthood. It represents most of the reproductive care received during a lifetime. If pregnant, one goes to an obstetrician.
Mid-Wife
Midwives are registered nurses who specialize in midwifery. As such, they’re trained healthcare providers who can oversee low-risk pregnancies, labor, and birth. They can provide other obstetric and gynecological services too. They can do exams and help with basic gynecological concerns like sexually transmitted infections, urinary tract infections, or yeast infections. They help support during labor and in the postpartum period with breastfeeding and birth control.
Doula
Doulas aren’t clinical professionals and can’t give medical advice. They can’t prescribe medicines, and they can’t deliver a baby. But they can offer physical and emotional support during labor—and sometimes during and after pregnancy. Doulas can help with breathing techniques, positional changes, and relaxation strategies during labor. Studies show doulas are associated with fewer C-sections and more vaginal births.
Doctors and dentists earn money by treating patients. CPAs and Attorneys have clients, and retail stores buy items low and sell them at higher prices. This is called a business model.
More formally, a business model identifies the products or services the business plans to sell, the target market, and any anticipated expenses, in order to outline how to generate a profit. Business models are important for both new and established businesses. They help companies attract investment, recruit talent, and motivate management and staff.
Businesses should regularly update their business model, or they’ll fail to anticipate trends and challenges ahead. Business models also help investors to evaluate companies that interest them and employees to understand the future of a company they may aspire to join.
***
The Business Model of Pharmacy Benefits Managers
In the United States, health insurance providers often hire a third party to handle price negotiations, insurance claims, and distribution of prescription drugs. Providers that use such pharmacy benefit managers include commercial health plans, self-insured employer plans, Medicare Part D [drug] plans, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, and state government employee plans. PBMs are designed to aggregate the collective buying power of en-rollees through their client health plans, enabling plan sponsors and individuals to obtain lower prices for their prescription drugs. PBMs negotiate price discounts from retail pharmacies, rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers, and mail-service pharmacies which home-deliver prescriptions without consulting face-to-face with a pharmacist.
Pharmacy benefit management companies can make revenue in several ways.
First, they collect administrative and service fees from the original insurance plan.
Then, they can also collect rebates from the manufacturer.
Traditional PBMs do not disclose the negotiated net price of the prescription drugs, allowing them to resell drugs at a public list price (also known as a sticker price), which is higher than the net price they negotiate with the manufacturer. This practice is known as “spread pricing”. The industry argues that savings are trade secrets. Pharmacies and insurance companies are often prohibited by PBMs from discussing costs and reimbursements. This leads to lack of transparency.
***
***
Therefore, states are often unaware of how much money they lose due to spread pricing, and the extent to which drug rebates are passed on to en-rollees of Medicare plans. In response, states like Ohio, West Virginia, and Louisiana have taken action to regulate PBMs within their Medicaid programs.
For instance, they have created new contracts that require all discounts and rebates to be reported to the states. In return, Medicaid pays PBMs a flat administrative fee.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
An ophthalmologist is a physician [MD, DO] who undergoes sub-specialty training in medical and surgical eye care. Following a medical degree, a doctor specializing in ophthalmology must pursue additional postgraduate residency training specific to that field. In the United States, following graduation from medical school, one must complete a four-year residency in ophthalmology to become an ophthalmologist. Following residency, additional specialty training (or fellowship) may be sought in a particular aspect of eye pathology.
Ophthalmologists prescribe medications to treat ailments, such as eye diseases, implement laser therapy, and perform surgery when needed. Ophthalmologists provide both primary and specialty eye care—medical and surgical. Most ophthalmologists participate in academic research on eye diseases at some point in their training and many include research as part of their career. Ophthalmology has always been at the forefront of medical research with a long history of advancement and innovation in eye care.
Optometrist
Optometrists focus on regular vision care and primary health care for the eye. After college, they spend 4 years in a professional program and get a doctor of optometry degree. But they don’t go to medical school. Some optometrists get additional clinical training or complete a specialty fellowship after optometry school. They:
Monitor eye conditions related to diseases like diabetes
Manage and treat conditions like dry eye and glaucoma
Provide low-vision aids and vision therapy
There are specialties among optometrists. They include:
Pediatric optometry. These providers work with babies, toddlers, and children, using special techniques to test their vision.
Neuro-optometry. If you have vision problems that result from a brain injury, this is the type of optometrist you might visit.
Low-vision optometry. If you have low vision—that means you can’t see well enough to perform your daily activities and your sight can’t be corrected by glasses or contact lenses, medicine, or surgery—low-vision optometrists offer devices and strategies that can improve your quality of life.
***
***
Optician
An optician is an eye care specialist who helps you choose the right eyeglasses, contact lenses or other vision correction devices. They can’t diagnose or treat conditions that affect your eyes or vision. They’ll work with you to get the right corrective lenses after your optometrist or ophthalmologist gives you a prescription.
Ocularist
An ocularist is an eye care specialist who provides care for people needing prosthetic eyes due to injury, infection or congenital disease (present at birth). Losing or damaging an eye can be a traumatic experience, and the need for a prosthetic can be overwhelming. Ocularists offer long-term care. They collaborate with your healthcare team to create or restore a more natural facial appearance with the goal of enhancing your health-related quality of life.
Trump says pharma tariffs could be as high as 250%
The president revealed that he plans to formally announce tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry “within the next week or so” in an attempt to force drug manufacturing to the US, he told CNBC several days ago.
In the early 1980s, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tverskey proved in numerous experiments that the reality of decision making differed greatly from the assumptions held by economists. They published their findings in Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision making under risk, which quickly became one of the most cited papers in all of economics.
To understand the importance of their breakthrough, we first need to take a step back and explain a few things. Up until that point, economists were working under a normative model of decision making. A normative model is a prescriptive approach that concerns itself with how people should make optimal decisions. Basically, if everyone was rational, this is how they should act.
Amanda, an RN client, was just informed by her financial advisor that she needed to re-launch her 403-b retirement plan. Since she was leery about investing, she quietly wondered why she couldn’t DIY. Little does her Financial Advisor know that she doesn’t intend to follow his advice, anyway! So, what went wrong?
The answer may be that her advisor didn’t deploy a behavioral economics framework to support her decision-making. One such framework is the “prospect theory” model that boils client decision-making into a “three step heuristic.”
According to colleague Eugene Schmuckler PhD MBA MEd CTS, Prospect theory makes the unspoken biases that we all have more explicit. By identifying all the background assumptions and preferences that clients [patients] bring to the office, decision-making can be crafted so that everyone [family, doctor and patient] or [FA, client and spouse] is on the same page.
1. Simplify choices by focusing on the key differences between investment [treatment] options such as stock, bonds, cash, and index funds.
2. Understanding that clients [patients] prefer greater certainty when it comes to pursuing financial [health] gains and are willing to accept uncertainty when trying to avoid a loss [illness].
3. Cognitive processes lead clients and patients to overestimate the value of their choices thanks to survivor bias, cognitive dissonance, appeals to authority and hindsight biases.
CITE: Jaan E. Sidorov MD [Harrisburg, PA]
Assessment
Much like in healthcare today, the current mass-customized approaches to the financial services industry fall short of recognizing more personalized advisory approaches like prospect theory and assisted client-centered investment decision-making.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
An acute care inpatient hospital is a health care organization or “anchor hospital” in which a patient is treated for an acute (immediate and severe) episode of illness or the subsequent treatment of injuries related to an accident or trauma, or during recovery from surgery. Specialized personnel using complex and sophisticated technical equipment and materials usually render acute professional care in a hospital setting. Unlike chronic care, acute care is often necessary for only a short time. Measures of acute health care utilization are represented by three separate rates:
Rate of admissions per 1000 patients.
Average length of stay per admission.
Total days of care per 1000 patients.
***
***
Psychiatric Hospital
A psychiatric hospital (behavioral health, mental hospital, or asylum) specializes in the treatment of patients with mental illness or drug-related illness or dependencies. Psychiatric wards differ only in that they are a unit of a larger hospital.
Specialty Hospital
A specialty hospital is a type of health care organization that has a limited focus to provide treatment for only certain illnesses such as cardiac care, orthopedic or plastic surgery, elder care, radiology / oncology services, neurological care, or pain management cases. These organizations are often owned by doctors who refer patients to them. In recent years, single-specialty hospitals have emerged in various locations in the United States. Instead of offering a full range of inpatient services, these hospitals focus on providing services relating to a single medical specialty or cluster of specialties.
Long-Term Care Hospital
A long-term care hospital is an entity that provides assistance and patient care for the activities of daily living (ADLs), including reminders and standby help for those with physical, mental, or emotional problems. This includes physical disability or other medical problems for 3 months or more (90 days). The criteria of five ADLs may also be used to determine the need for help with the following: meal preparation, shopping, light housework, money management, and telephoning. Other important considerations include taking medications, doing laundry, and getting around outside.
Rural Hospital
The parameters of a rural hospital are determined based on distance. A rural hospital is defined as a hospital serving a geographic area 10 or more miles from the nexus of a population center of 30,000 or more.
More specifically, a rural hospital means an entity characterized by one of the following:
Type A rural hospital—small and remote, has fewer than 50 beds, and is more than 30 miles from the nearest hospital
Type B rural hospital—small and rural, has fewer than 50 beds, and is 30 miles or less from the nearest hospital
Type C rural hospital—considered rural and has 50 or more beds
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on July 31, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
***
On July 14, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its proposed Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for calendar year (CY) 2026.
In addition to the agency’s suggested increase to physician payments, the proposed rule also announces a new payment model and more tele-health flexibilities.
According to CMS, the “proposed rule is one of several proposed rules that reflect a broader Administration-wide strategy to create a health care system that results in better quality, efficiency, empowerment, and innovation for all Medicare beneficiaries.” (Read more…)
Posted on July 28, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
THE FOOT & ANKLE DOCTORS
By A.I.
***
***
Podiatry offers a promising career with a balanced mix of specialization and income. By understanding the factors that influence salaries—such as location, experience, and practice type—a doctor can strategically enhance his/er earning potential. Staying informed about healthcare policies and market trends is crucial for maximizing income.
With an aging population and advancements in technology, the demand for podiatrists is expected to grow, making it a rewarding field both professionally and financially. Investing in specialized training and adapting to policy changes will help doctors remain competitive and successful in the evolving healthcare landscape.
A podiatrist is a healthcare professional specialized in diagnosing and treating conditions related to the feet and ankles. Their responsibilities include performing surgeries, prescribing orthotics, and providing preventive care.
What education is required to become a podiatrist?
To become a podiatrist, one must complete a Doctor of Podiatric Medicine (DPM) degree, which typically takes four years after earning a bachelor’s degree. Following this, a residency program lasting 2-3 years is required for practical training.
What factors influence the salary of a podiatrist?
Geographic location, level of experience, specialization, and type of practice significantly affect a podiatrist’s salary. Areas with a higher cost of living or demand for services usually offer higher salaries.
How does the salary of a podiatrist compare to other medical professions?
Podiatrists generally earn more than general practitioners but less than specialty surgeons. This disparity is due to differences in training length, specialization, and practice complexity among these professions.
Can the salary of a podiatrist increase over time?
Yes, a podiatrist’s salary can increase with additional experience, further specialization, and strategic practice location choices. Continuing education and staying updated on healthcare policies can also enhance earning potential.
What impact do healthcare policies have on podiatrist salaries?
Healthcare policies, including changes in insurance reimbursement rates and government health initiatives, can affect podiatrist salaries. Adapting to these policy shifts is crucial for maximizing earning potential in the field.
What are the future trends in podiatry salaries?
Future trends suggest potential salary growth due to increasing demand from an aging population, technological advancements, and geographic disparities in healthcare access. Keeping informed about these trends can help podiatrists plan their careers strategically.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, hospitals, financial advisory firms, RIAs, or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR-http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Posted on July 26, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Health Capital Consultants, LLC
***
***
On July 15, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the proposed rule for the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System for calendar year (CY) 2026.
Among other items, the agency proposes increasing payments to all outpatient providers, eliminating the Inpatient Only (IPO) List, and changing quality reporting programs.
This Health Capital Topics article reviews the proposed updates and changes to outpatient reimbursement. (Read more…)
Stocks: Investors were pleased to hear about the trade deal with Japan yesterday and reports of an agreement with the EU coming soon kept the stock rally alive through market close. The S&P 500 notched its 12th new closing record this year, and the NASDAQ ended the day above 21,000 for the first time.
Bonds: Treasury yields rose a bit after an auction of 20-year notes was met with strong demand, indicating investor appetite for longer-term US debt.
Commodities: Oil inched higher while gold edged lower as investors hedge their bets in anticipation of more trade deals before the August 1st deadline.
Posted on July 24, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
MEDICAL EXECUTIVE-POST–TODAY’SNEWSLETTERBRIEFING
***
Essays, Opinions and Curated News in Health Economics, Investing, Business, Management and Financial Planning for Physician Entrepreneurs and their Savvy Advisors and Consultants
“Serving Almost One Million Doctors, Financial Advisors and Medical Management Consultants Daily“
A Partner of the Institute of Medical Business Advisors , Inc.
Insurers selling plans on ACA exchanges are expected to hike premiums next year as subsidies on them are set to expire, with the average person expected to be paying 75% more, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan research group KFF.
The terms “psychologist” and “psychiatrist” are often used interchangeably to describe anyone who provides therapy services, but the two professions and the services they provide differ in terms of content and scope. A major difference between the two types of experts is that psychiatrists can prescribe medication [Rx].
As physicians [MD/DO] psychiatrists are trained to recognize the ways biological processes affect mental functioning.
Psychologists are oriented to how thoughts, feelings, and social factors influence mental functioning.
PSYCHIATRIST
Psychiatrists are medical or osteopathic doctors who are able to prescribe psychotropic medications, which they do in conjunction with providing psychotherapy though medical and pharmacological interventions are often their focus.
PSYCHOLOGIST
Though many psychologists hold doctorate degrees, they are not medical doctors, and most cannot prescribe medications. Rather, they solely provide psycho-therapy, which may involve cognitive and behavioral interventions, psycho-dynamic or psycho-analytic approaches.
NOTEPROTECTED TITLE: The title of “psychologist” can only be used by an individual who has completed the required education, training, and state license requirements. Informal titles, such as “counselor” or “therapist,” are often used as well. Other mental health care professionals, such as licensed social workers, can claim those titles, but not the title of “psychologist.”
Posted on July 13, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
By Health Capital Consultants LLC
***
***
On June 25th, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its forecast on U.S. healthcare spending through 2033. The analysis, published in Health Affairs, estimated healthcare spending growth in 2024 and projected the growth into 2033. CMS found that overall healthcare spending growth has decreased slightly but is still elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels, and is expected to continue to moderately grow.
This Health Capital Topics article examines the factors underlying the forecasts. (Read more…)