• Member Statistics

    • 836,834 Colleagues-to-Date [Sponsored by a generous R&D grant from iMBA, Inc.]
  • David E. Marcinko [Editor-in-Chief]

    As a former Dean and appointed University Professor and Endowed Department Chair, Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA was a NYSE broker and investment banker for a decade who was respected for his unique perspectives, balanced contrarian thinking and measured judgment to influence key decision makers in strategic education, health economics, finance, investing and public policy management.

    Dr. Marcinko is originally from Loyola University MD, Temple University in Philadelphia and the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center in PA; as well as Oglethorpe University and Emory University in Georgia, the Atlanta Hospital & Medical Center; Kellogg-Keller Graduate School of Business and Management in Chicago, and the Aachen City University Hospital, Koln-Germany. He became one of the most innovative global thought leaders in medical business entrepreneurship today by leveraging and adding value with strategies to grow revenues and EBITDA while reducing non-essential expenditures and improving dated operational in-efficiencies.

    Professor David Marcinko was a board certified surgical fellow, hospital medical staff President, public and population health advocate, and Chief Executive & Education Officer with more than 425 published papers; 5,150 op-ed pieces and over 135+ domestic / international presentations to his credit; including the top ten [10] biggest drug, DME and pharmaceutical companies and financial services firms in the nation. He is also a best-selling Amazon author with 30 published academic text books in four languages [National Institute of Health, Library of Congress and Library of Medicine].

    Dr. David E. Marcinko is past Editor-in-Chief of the prestigious “Journal of Health Care Finance”, and a former Certified Financial Planner® who was named “Health Economist of the Year” in 2010. He is a Federal and State court approved expert witness featured in hundreds of peer reviewed medical, business, economics trade journals and publications [AMA, ADA, APMA, AAOS, Physicians Practice, Investment Advisor, Physician’s Money Digest and MD News] etc.

    Later, Dr. Marcinko was a vital and recruited BOD  member of several innovative companies like Physicians Nexus, First Global Financial Advisors and the Physician Services Group Inc; as well as mentor and coach for Deloitte-Touche and other start-up firms in Silicon Valley, CA.

    As a state licensed life, P&C and health insurance agent; and dual SEC registered investment advisor and representative, Marcinko was Founding Dean of the fiduciary and niche focused CERTIFIED MEDICAL PLANNER® chartered professional designation education program; as well as Chief Editor of the three print format HEALTH DICTIONARY SERIES® and online Wiki Project.

    Dr. David E. Marcinko’s professional memberships included: ASHE, AHIMA, ACHE, ACME, ACPE, MGMA, FMMA, FPA and HIMSS. He was a MSFT Beta tester, Google Scholar, “H” Index favorite and one of LinkedIn’s “Top Cited Voices”.

    Marcinko is “ex-officio” and R&D Scholar-on-Sabbatical for iMBA, Inc. who was recently appointed to the MedBlob® [military encrypted medical data warehouse and health information exchange] Advisory Board.

    entrepreneur

    Frontal_lobe_animation

  • ME-P Information & Content Channels

  • ME-P Archives Silo [2006 – 2020]

  • Ann Miller RN MHA [Managing Editor]

    ME-P SYNDICATIONS:
    WSJ.com,
    CNN.com,
    Forbes.com,
    WashingtonPost.com,
    BusinessWeek.com,
    USNews.com, Reuters.com,
    TimeWarnerCable.com,
    e-How.com,
    News Alloy.com,
    and Congress.org

    Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners(TM)

    Product Details

    Product Details

    Product Details

  • CERTIFIED MEDICAL PLANNER® program

    New "Self-Directed" Study Option SinceJanuary 1st, 2020
  • Most Recent ME-Ps

  • PodiatryPrep.org


    BOARD CERTIFICATION EXAM STUDY GUIDES
    Lower Extremity Trauma
    [Click on Image to Enlarge]

  • ME-P Free Advertising Consultation

    The “Medical Executive-Post” is about connecting doctors, health care executives and modern consulting advisors. It’s about free-enterprise, business, practice, policy, personal financial planning and wealth building capitalism. We have an attitude that’s independent, outspoken, intelligent and so Next-Gen; often edgy, usually controversial. And, our consultants “got fly”, just like U. Read it! Write it! Post it! “Medical Executive-Post”. Call or email us for your FREE advertising and sales consultation TODAY [770.448.0769]

    Product Details

    Product Details

  • Medical & Surgical e-Consent Forms

    ePodiatryConsentForms.com
  • iMBA R&D Services

    Commission a Subject Matter Expert Report [$2500-$9999]January 1st, 2020
    Medical Clinic Valuations * Endowment Fund Management * Health Capital Formation * Investment Policy Statement Analysis * Provider Contracting & Negotiations * Marketplace Competition * Revenue Cycle Enhancements; and more! HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
  • iMBA Inc., OFFICES

    Suite #5901 Wilbanks Drive, Norcross, Georgia, 30092 USA [1.770.448.0769]. Our location is real and we are now virtually enabled to assist new long distance clients and out-of-town colleagues.

  • ME-P Publishing

  • SEEKING INDUSTRY INFO PARTNERS?

    If you want the opportunity to work with leading health care industry insiders, innovators and watchers, the “ME-P” may be right for you? We are unbiased and operate at the nexus of theoretical and applied R&D. Collaborate with us and you’ll put your brand in front of a smart & tightly focused demographic; one at the forefront of our emerging healthcare free marketplace of informed and professional “movers and shakers.” Our Ad Rate Card is available upon request [770-448-0769].

  • Reader Comments, Quips, Opinions, News & Updates

  • Start-Up Advice for Businesses, DRs and Entrepreneurs

    ImageProxy “Providing Management, Financial and Business Solutions for Modernity”
  • Up-Trending ME-Ps

  • Capitalism and Free Enterprise Advocacy

    Whether you’re a mature CXO, physician or start-up entrepreneur in need of management, financial, HR or business planning information on free markets and competition, the "Medical Executive-Post” is the online place to meet for Capitalism 2.0 collaboration. Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds. THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
  • OIG Fraud Warnings

    Beware of health insurance marketplace scams OIG's Most Wanted Fugitives at oig.hhs.gov

Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC)

CMS Includes Several Changes in OPPS Proposed Rule

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

On August 4, 2020, CMS released the latest in a series of recently-published proposed rules, the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) proposed rule for fiscal year (FY) 2021.

This proposed rule builds upon executive orders such as “Protecting and Improving Medicare for Our Nation’s Seniors,” signed by President Trump in October 2019 and Trump Administration initiatives such as “Patients Over Paperwork.” In a press release, CMS highlighted the proposed rule’s focus on increasing competition among providers to give patients more choice, lowering out-of-pocket surgery costs, increasing provider flexibility, and allowing patients to make more informed decisions about their care. (Read more…) 

***

2021 Physician Fee Schedule

2021 Physician Fee Schedule & Quality Payment Program Proposed Rules Released

[By Health Capital Consultants]

***

On August 3, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released two proposed payment rules for calendar year (CY) 2021: the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) and the Quality Payment Program (QPP). CMS included in the MPFS proposed rule adjustments to physician payment rates and an expansion of telemedicine services.

The proposed QPP rule, meanwhile, takes into account adjustments made for the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) and seeks to reduce unnecessary regulatory burden on providers by eliminating some requirements. These rules, which have garnered mixed reactions from stakeholders, are both open for comment until October 5, 2020. (Read more…)

***

***

CMS Value Based Purchasing for Drugs

CMS Proposed Rule Supports Value-Based Purchasing for Drugs

Courtesy: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

On June 19, 2020 the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule regarding Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP) regulations, with the aim of lowering drug prices, increasing patient access, and encouraging innovation in the insurance and pharmaceutical industries.

This proposal is consistent with the Trump Administration’s Blueprint to Lower Drug Prices (Blueprint) released in May 2018, in which the administration highlighted its goal to “avoid excessive pricing by relying more on value-based pricing by expanding outcome-based payments in Medicare and Medicaid” and to “speed access to and lower the cost of new drugs by clarifying policies for sharing information between insurers and drug makers.”

***

***

The proposed rule seeks to accomplish the Blueprint’s goals by reducing regulatory barriers that have previously prevented commercial plans and states from entering into value-based purchasing (VBP) arrangements with drug manufacturers.

Colleagues from Health Capital Consultants, LLC; explain.

ESSAY: DRUGS

Assessment: Your thoughts and comments are appreciated.

BUSINESS, FINANCE, INVESTING AND INSURANCE TEXTS FOR DOCTORS:

1 – https://lnkd.in/ebWtzGg

2 – https://lnkd.in/ezkQMfR

3 – https://lnkd.in/ewJPTJs

THANK YOU

***

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized the calendar year (CY) 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS), the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS), and the Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System

CMS Finalizes 2019 Physician & Outpatient Fee Schedules

By TODD A. ZIGRANG

***
In the course of twenty-four hours, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized the calendar year (CY) 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS), the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS), and the Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System. The finalized rules generally remained unchanged from their proposed versions, with a couple of exceptions. Each finalized rule is reviewed briefly in this special edition of the Health Capital Topics e-journal. (Read more…) 

https://www.healthcapital.com/hcc/newsletter/11.2.18_Alert/HTML/CMS/convert_hc_topics_alert_mpfs_opps_11.2.18.php

***

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements.

Book Marcinko: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/dr-david-marcinkos-bookings/

Subscribe: MEDICAL EXECUTIVE POST for curated news, essays, opinions and analysis from the public health, economics, finance, marketing, IT, business and policy management ecosystem.

DOCTORS:

“Insurance & Risk Management Strategies for Doctors” https://tinyurl.com/ydx9kd93

“Fiduciary Financial Planning for Physicians” https://tinyurl.com/y7f5pnox

“Business of Medical Practice 2.0” https://tinyurl.com/yb3x6wr8

HOSPITALS:

“Financial Management Strategies for Hospitals” https://tinyurl.com/yagu567d

“Operational Strategies for Clinics and Hospitals” https://tinyurl.com/y9avbrq5

***

Product DetailsProduct Details

On Hospital Price Growth

Explosion in Spending – Inflation Since 1960

By CMS

***

[Click to Enlarge]

***

The greatest wealth transfer in American history has been from the working/middle class to a wasteful healthcare system.

Sadly, once-mission-based hospitals lost their way failing to address healthcare caused 20 yr long economic depression for working/middle class. Employers spending far more on employees than 20 years ago but all of it has gone to healthcare with no demonstrable outcomes improvement

-Dave Chase [Creator HealthRosetta]

***

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements.

Book Marcinko: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/dr-david-marcinkos-bookings/

Subscribe: MEDICAL EXECUTIVE POST for curated news, essays, opinions and analysis from the public health, economics, finance, marketing, IT, business and policy management ecosystem.

DOCTORS:

“Insurance & Risk Management Strategies for Doctors” https://tinyurl.com/ydx9kd93

“Fiduciary Financial Planning for Physicians” https://tinyurl.com/y7f5pnox

“Business of Medical Practice 2.0” https://tinyurl.com/yb3x6wr8

HOSPITALS:

“Financial Management Strategies for Hospitals” https://tinyurl.com/yagu567d

“Operational Strategies for Clinics and Hospitals” https://tinyurl.com/y9avbrq5

***

Product DetailsProduct Details

CMS Seeks Comments on Medicare “DPC Model”

CMS Seeks Comments on Medicare “DPC Model”

“The Direct Primary Care (DPC) model is burgeoning as patients yearn for quality time with their doctor at an affordable price,” writes Marilyn Singleton, MD, JD in a recent oped.

***

https://mailchi.mp/aapsonline/cms-dpc-model

***

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. https://medicalexecutivepost.com/dr-david-marcinkos-bookings/

Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Product DetailsProduct Details

***

A MIPS: Quality Payment Program Report

Percentage Clinicians Might Lose for Failure to Report

By CMS

***

***

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, urls and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

***

States with the Worst Medicare Waste?

Join Our Mailing List 

By http://www.MCOL.com

The Federal Government

***

graphoid020117

***

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

***

A Small Step Forward on Surprise Medical Care “Balance-Billing”

Join Our Mailing List

By @nicholas_bagley

The ME-P Back Story about a Decade Ago:

Link: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2008/09/17/balance-billing-conundrum/

More on out of network Balance Billing a year ago and … today?

Per a rule released last year, CMS will now require qualified health plans to count the cost sharing paid by the enrollee for an essential health benefit. But, what about today?

***

210_1

***

 A small step forward on surprise billing

Assessment

We’ve written about this problem before on the ME-P; and we now appreciate this guest ME-P update.

More: Balance-Billing Conundrum

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

***

Tom Price for HHS Secretary & Seema Verma for CMMS

Join Our Mailing List

***

Obamacare critic for HHS 

***

112_price_ga06

***

Trump nominates Rep. Tom Price for HHS secretary

***

th

Trump picks Seema Verma to head Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

***

Product DetailsProduct Details

***

A MACRA Info-Graphic by CMS

Join Our Mailing List

By CMS

***

macra

***

6 Key Takeaways from MACRA Final Rule

  1. Flexibilities provided in the first transition year may continue in 2018.
  2. During the first year of MIPS, providers will not be evaluated on cost or resource use.
  3. Despite flexibilities allowed under the final rule, it is in providers’ best interest to participate as much as possible during the transition year — and not just for the practice.
  4. Quality measure benchmarks will be published this year.
  5. Vendors need to prepare, too.
  6. Small group providers and solo physicians could get squeezed out.

Source: Becker’s Hospital Review

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

***

Find Your Doctor’s Payments

Join Our Mailing List

FBF300BA-321A-49FD-9289-0DE0AD63DCE5

 CMS’ Open Payments Program Posts 2015 Financial Data

***

 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has published the 2015 Open Payments (sometimes called the “Sunshine Act”) data, along with newly submitted and updated payment records for 2013 and 2014, at https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.
The Open Payments program requires that transfers of value by drug, device, biological, and medical supply manufacturers to physicians and teaching hospitals be published on a public website.
***
physician investors

Portrait of two surgeons in a operating room viewing paper charts.

***
Assessment
 ***
In program year 2015, healthcare industry manufacturers reported $7.52 billion in payments and ownership and investment interests to physicians and teaching hospitals. This amount is comprised of 11.90 million total records attributable to 618,931 physicians and 1,116 teaching hospitals. To find out what any doctor received in 2015, click here.
 (((
Conclusion
 (((
Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

***

CMS Announces New Random Payment Generator

Join Our Mailing List

Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation

By CMS and CMMI

CMS JUST ANNOUNCED a new Innovation Model from the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, the Random Payment Generator, which will launch as a demonstration in January 2017.

“We’re pleased to add an eighth category of Innovation Models to our innovation portfolio,”

says CMMI spokesperson Dr. Emmett Brown.

“We felt that with the wide range of models developed to date, we needed to develop a ‘placebo’ initiative that could be measured against the various concepts we have been testing. We’ll be able to better determine if simply taking random actions while facing the formidable challenges in purchasing and coordinating healthcare services yields any different results than the complex models we have undertaken.”

The Random Payment Generator will simply randomize payment amounts to be paid for billed services, based on an algorithm that has programmed into repurposed surplus portable equipment being distributed to Medicare Administrative Contractors. Doctor Brown explained that the older equipment has no Internet connectivity and thus is not susceptible to breaches from outside hackers.

CMS is seeking hospital and medical group applicants to participate in the one-year Medicare trial in which they may render services and submit billings without being subject to most provider program requirements, but will accept whatever payment amount is assigned by the Random Payment Generator as payment in full.

“A number of provider participants in our other models have complained that they can’t understand or find any logic in how they are getting paid, and the basis for payment under this new model will certainly be easier to communicate and understand,”

Doctor Brown continued.

***

ImageProxy

[A Random Payment Generator being shipped to Medicare Administrative Contractors]

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

 

EHR Meaningful Use Rules Finalized

Join Our Mailing List 

The CMS Modifications

[By staff reporters]

Source: Joseph Goedert, Health Data Management [10/7/15]
***
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
***
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has issued a 752-page final rule covering three components of the electronic health records meaningful use program. The rule finalizes modifications to Stages 1 and 2; the 2015 edition of electronic health records certification criteria; and Stage 3 of meaningful use.
Modifications
Under the modifications to Stages 1 and 2, eligible professionals have 10 meaningful use objectives, down from 18 previously. In Stage 3, there are 8 objectives for eligible professionals and hospitals, and more than 60 percent of measures require interoperability.
Assessment
The entire rule is available here.
***
MD with eHR
***
Conclusion
Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Medical Provider Billing Facts for 2014

Join Our Mailing List 

A Look at Medicare Spending

By http://www.MCOL.com

***

billing

***

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

[HOSPITAL OPERATIONS, ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT COMPANION TEXTBOOK SET]

Product DetailsProduct Details

[Foreword Dr. Phillips MD JD MBA LLM] *** [Foreword Dr. Nash MD MBA FACP]

***

Understanding “Meaningful Use” Attestation Numbers for 2014

Join Our Mailing List

Providers versus Hospitals

By CMS

ME121014_PAGE_16

Assessment

So, what do the hospitals know –  that the doctors do not?

Channel Surfing the ME-P

Have you visited our other topic channels? Established to facilitate idea exchange and link our community together, the value of these topics is dependent upon your input. Please take a minute to visit. And, to prevent that annoying spam, we ask that you register. It is fast, free and secure.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

Product Details

On Hospital 30 Day Re-Admission Rates

Join Our Mailing List

And … Problems Paying Medical Bills for 2011

By http://www.MOCL.com

ImageProxy

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

Product Details

National Health Expenditure Growth

Join Our Mailing List

A Report from the Office of the Actuary

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Office of the Actuary, overall national health expenditures grew at an annual rate of 3.7 percent in 2012, marking the fourth consecutive year of low growth. Health spending as a share of gross domestic product fell slightly from 17.3 percent in 2011 to 17.2 percent in 2012.

Private Insurance

Private health insurance spending growth remained low. Private health insurance spending continued to grow at a low rate, increasing 3.2 percent in 2012 compared to 3.4 percent growth in 2011. Medicare spending growth continued to be low. Despite a large uptick in Medicare enrollment, Medicare spending growth slowed slightly in 2012, increasing by 4.8 percent compared to 5.0 percent growth in 2011.

The Totals for MC/MD

Total Medicare spending per enrollee grew by only 0.7 percent in 2012. Medicaid spending continued to grow at a historically low rate. Total Medicaid spending grew 3.3 percent in 2012. While an increase over 2011, this increase still represents historically low overall growth rates tied to improved economic conditions, as well as efforts by states to control costs.

Rx Drugs

Prescription drug spending growth was low. Retail prescription drug spending slowed in 2012, growing only 0.4 percent as the result of numerous drugs losing their patent protection, leading to increased sales of lower-cost generics. Nursing home spending growth slowed.

Pharma

Assessment

Spending for freestanding nursing care facilities and continuing care retirement communities increased by only 1.6 percent in 2012, down from 4.3 percent growth in 2011, due to a one-time Medicare rate adjustment for skilled nursing facilities.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Product DetailsProduct Details

Product Details

Hospital Information Systems and the PP-ACA

Join Our Mailing List

Extension of Hospital Information Systems Beyond the Hospital

By Brent A. Metfessel MD

Dr. MetfesselThe Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), affirmed after the November 7th 2012 presidential election, includes a number of policies and potential projects with the aim of improving quality of care while reducing costs – or at least greatly slowing increases in health care costs from year to year.

Included in this effort are CMS payment incentives for providers that can show care patterns that meet the goals of high quality, cost-efficient care.

HHS and ACOs 

On March 31, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a set of proposed new rules to aid clinicians, hospitals, and other health facilities and providers to improve coordination of care for Medicare patients using a model known as Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). ACOs that are shown to lower health care cost growth while meeting CMS quality benchmarks, including measures of patient/caregiver experience of care, care coordination, patient safety, preventive health, and health of high-risk populations, will receive incentive payments as part of the Medicare Shared Savings Program.

But, in some proposed models ACOs may also be held accountable for shared losses.

Care Co-ordination

Coordination of care means that hospitals, physician offices, and other providers have a complete record of patients’ episodes of care, including diagnostic tests, procedures, and medication information.  This potentially would decrease extra costs from unnecessary duplication of services as well as reducing medical errors from incomplete understanding of the patients’ illness histories and medical care provided.

It is also believed that better coordination of care may prevent 30-day hospital readmissions (which occur for nearly one in five Medicare discharges), since needed post-discharge care would be more readily obtainable with more aggressive care coordination.

Medicare patients in ACOs, however, would still be allowed to see providers outside of the ACO, and proposals exist to prevent physicians in ACOs from being penalized for patients with a greater illness severity or complexity.

According to a CMS analysis, ACOs may result in Medicare savings of up to $960 million over three years.  Although the Affordable Care Act’s ACO provisions primarily target Medicare beneficiaries, private insurers are also beginning to create care models based on the accountable care paradigm.  Insurers could offer similar incentives to the ACO model described above, and which might include features such as performance based contracting or tiered benefit models that favor physicians who score highly on care quality and cost-efficiency measures.

Balance

Only the Beginning

ACOs and other implementations of the accountable care paradigm, however, are in their beginning stages, with a number of pilots around the country currently being conducted to more fully evaluate the concept, and there still is some controversy over the best way to achieve these goals. It is a continuing balancing act.

The critical point here is that in all likelihood, with the advent of the ACA and other initiatives, stemming the upward tide of medical cost increases becomes an even higher priority, and no matter what the final models will look like, the success of any of the models requires a high level of care coordination – requiring information systems that are fully compatible and allow seamless and errorless transmission of information between sites of service and the various providers that can be involved in patient care.

More:

  1. Ground Breaking Book Explains Why Accountable Care Organizations May Be the Answer the Health Care Industry Has Been Seeking!
  2. Evaluating ACOs at Mid-Launch
  3. How Using a ‘Scorecard’ Can Smooth Your Hospital’s Transition to a Population Health-Based Reimbursement Model
  4. Doubting the Accountable Care Organization B-Model

Assessment

Thus, wherever a patient goes for care, all the information needed to provide high-quality and cost-efficient care is immediately available.

References

Feds Take Critical Look at Meaningful Use Payments”, InformationWeek Healthcare, October 24, 2012.  http://www.informationweek.com/healthcare/policy/feds-take-critical-look-at-meaningful-us/240009661 [Accessed on November 2, 2012].

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

LEXICONS: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
PODIATRISTS: www.PodiatryPrep.com
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com

Product DetailsProduct Details

Product Details

Doubting the Accountable Care Organization B-Model

New Healthcare Business Model or Edsel Model?

Join Our Mailing List 

By David Edward Marcinko MBA http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

[Publisher-in-Chief]

Dr. Marcinko with ME-P FansDefined by Professor Michael Porter at Harvard Business School, value is defined as a function of outcomes and costs. Therefore to achieve high value we must deliver the best possible outcomes in the most efficient way, outcomes which matter from the perspective of the individual receiving healthcare and not provider process measures or targets.

Sir Muir Gray expanded on the idea of technical value (outcomes/costs) to specifically describe ‘personal value’ and ‘allocative value’, encouraging us to focus also on shared decision making, individual preferences for care and ensuring that resources are allocated for maximum value.

Healthcare Value and ACOs

According to our Medical Executive-Post Health Dictionary Series of administrative terms http://www.HealthDictionarySeries.org  and health economist and colleague Robert James Cimasi MHA, ASA, AVA CMP™ of www.HealthCapital.com; an ACO is a healthcare organization in which a set of providers, usually large physician groups and hospitals, are held accountable for the cost and quality of care delivered to a specific local population.

ACOs aim to affect provider’s patient expenditures and outcomes by integrating clinical and administrative departments to coordinate care and share financial risk.

ACO Launch

Since their four-page introduction in the PP-ACA of 2010, ACOs have been implemented in both the Federal and commercial healthcare markets, with 32 Pioneer ACOs selected (on December 19, 2011), 116 Federal applications accepted (on April 10, 2012 and July 9, 2012), and at least 160 or more Commercial ACOs in existence today.

Federal Contracts

Federal ACO contracts are established between an ACO and CMS, and are regulated under the CMS Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) Final Rule, published November 2, 2011.  ACOs participating in the MSSP are accountable for the health outcomes, represented by 33 quality metrics, and Medicare beneficiary expenditures of a prospectively assigned population of Medicare beneficiaries.

If a Federal ACO achieves Medicare beneficiary expenditures below a CMS established benchmark (and meets quality targets), they are eligible to receive a portion of the achieved Medicare beneficiary expenditure savings, in the form of a shared savings payment.

Commercial Contracts

Commercial ACO contracts are not limited by any specific legislation, only by the contract between the ACO and a commercial payor.

In addition to shared savings models, Commercial ACOs may incentivize lower costs and improved patient outcomes through reimbursement models that share risk between the payor and the providers, i.e., pay for performance compensation arrangements and/or partial to full capitation.

Although commercial ACOs experience a greater degree of flexibility in their structure and reimbursement, the principals for success for both Federal ACOs and Commercial ACOs are similar.

###

Eidsel

Dr. David E. Marcinko with 1960 Ford Edsel

[© iMBA, Inc. All rights reserved, USA.]

[The Edsel was an automobile marque that was planned, developed, and manufactured by the Ford Motor Company during the 1958, 1959, and 1960 model years. With the Edsel, Ford had expected to make significant inroads into the market share of both General Motors and Chrysler and close the gap between itself and GM in the domestic American automotive market. But, contrary to Ford’s internal plans and projections, the Edsel never gained popularity with contemporary American car buyers and sold poorly. The Ford Motor Company lost millions of dollars on the Edsel’s development, manufacturing and marketing].

More:

 

Update

Junking the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) would undoubtedly let the proverbial air out of the MACRA balloon, dealing a significant blow to the value-based reimbursement shift; right?

Assessment

Although nearly any healthcare enterprise can integrate and become an ACO, larger enterprises, may be best suited for ACO status.

Larger organizations are more able to accommodate the significant capital requirements of ACO development, implementation, and operation (e.g., healthcare information technology), and sustain the sufficient number of beneficiaries to have a significant impact on quality and cost metrics.

Conclusion

But, will this new B-Model work? Isn’t leading doctors in a shared collaborative effort a bit like herding cats? And, what about patients, HIEs, outcomes management, data analytics and … Population Health via our colleague David B. Nash MD MBA of Thomas Jefferson University, often considered the “father” of Pop Health?

OR, what about the developing IRS scandal and full PP-ACA launch in 2014? Will it affect federal funding, full roll-out, or even repeal of the entire Act?

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Product DetailsProduct Details

A Financial eMR “Got-Ya” from Uncle Sam?

Join Our Mailing List

CMS and the Feds Want to Verify Docs eMR Info Before Meaningful Use Payment

By ME-P Staff Reporters

The conversion to electronic medical records [eMRs] is “vulnerable” to fraud and abuse because of the failure of Medicare and CMS officials to develop appropriate safeguards, according to a sharply critical report just issued by federal investigators.

###

[mobile eMR in clincal use]

###

Full Report: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-05-11-00250.pdf

Assessment

Requiring an audit before paying hospitals and doctors could  significantly delay payments to providers.

Ya think!

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Hospitals: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Product Details

What Does a PQRS Really Measure?

And, What Does a PQRSMeasure Group Look Like?

Join Our Mailing List

[By Staff Reporters]

At a basic level, a Physician Quality Reporting System [PQRS] is a program that pays medical providers for reporting outcomes on quality outcomes metrics for Medicare Part B patients.

Primary care and specialty care providers of all kinds can participate by selecting outcomes measures that are pertinent to their fields. There is something for most every specialty, even pathology and radiology.

For example, you may choose from a menu of outcome measures and pick those measures you want, or you can report on a predetermined group of measures that focus on a specific condition or situation, such as diabetes or perioperative care.

The CMS Document

According to the 655 page 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry Reporting of Individual Measures produced by CMS, here are some high-level descriptions of individual measures.

Assessment

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Our Newest Textbook Release

Buy from Amazon

Learn How to Profit and Thrive in the PP-ACA Era

BOOK FOREWORD / TESTIMONIAL

More on “Meaningful Use” Requirements

Join Our Mailing List

And  …  Its’ Impact on eHRs

Carol Miller RN MBA millerconsultgroup@gmail.com

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009introduced the “Meaningful Use” requirement for EHR systems with three main components:

The Components

1) The use of a certified EHR in a meaningful manner, such as e-prescribing, 2) The use of a certified EHR technology for electronic exchange of health information to improve quality of health care, and 3) The use of a certified EHR technology to submit clinical quality and other measures.

Meaningful Use refers to a set of 15 criteria that medical providers must meet in order to prove that they are using their EHRs as an effective tool in their practice.  There are also 10 additional criteria that are considered a la carte from which only 5 need to be demonstrated by the medical provider.

In total, 20 Meaningful Use criteria must be used within the EHR to qualify for stimulus payments during Stage One of the EHR incentive program.   Each of the criteria were developed and further reviewed by the Office of the National Coordinator [ONC] with public input.

A Five Year TimeLine

Meaningful use will be measured in stages over five years.  Each stage represents a level of adoption.  Many certified EHRS will allow providers to complete all Meaningful Use criteria, whereas others will only certify what is required in the early stages and modify at a later date with any new criteria.

The three stages are:

Stage One:  Essentially, Stage One is using the major functionality of a certified EHR.  This includes documenting set percentages of your visits, diagnoses, prescriptions, immunizations and other relevant health information electronically; using the clinical support tools (warnings and reminders that will be included in a certified EHR); and sharing patient information.  Providers and hospitals must report quality measures and public health information. For providers they must report on 6 clinical quality measures – 3 required core measures and 3 additional measures selected from a set of 38 clinical quality measures.  Eligible hospitals and Critical Care Hospitals (CAHs) must report on all 15 of the clinical quality measures.  Stage One is required in years 2011 and 2012.

Stage Two:  In addition to continuing to use all functionality from Stage One, physicians will be required to use EHRs to send and receive information such as lab orders and results.   Other criteria may be added.  Stage Two is expected to be implemented in 2013.

Stage Three:  This stage will continue fulfilling the criteria from Stages One and Two and will include clinical decisions support for national high priority conditions; emailing patients in a Personal Health Record (PHR); accessing comprehensive patient data; and improving population health.  Stage Three criteria have not been developed to date and the implementation is not expected until 2015.

Assessment

CMS payment penalties for non-compliance to the meaningful use regulations will begin in 2016 with an initial 1% penalty which could escalate to 5% five years later.  Therefore, with these criteria in place, we are likely to see virtually all hospitals attempt to meet the meaningful use criteria to avoid penalty cost.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Buy from Amazon

Learn How to Profit and Thrive in the PP-ACA Era

BOOK FOREWORD / TESTIMONIAL

Case Model Illustration of a Six Sigma Healthcare Pioneer

Join Our Mailing List

The Mount Carmel Health System

By Mark Matthews MD

A “Scrubbed” True Illustration

One of the earliest healthcare adopters of Six Sigma was the Mount Carmel Health System in Columbus, Ohio.

The organization was barely breaking even in the summer of 2000 when competition from surrounding providers made things worse. Employee layoffs added fuel to an already all-time low employee morale.

The CEO

Chief Executive Officer Joe Calvaruso was determined to stem the bleeding, break the cycle of poor financial performance and return the hospital system to profitability.  He sought the potential benefits of Six Sigma and began a full deployment of its methodology. The plan was a bold move, as the organization ensured that no one would be terminated as a result of a Six Sigma project having eliminated his or her previous duties. These employees would be offered an alternative position in a different department. Moreover, top personnel were asked to leave their current positions to be trained and work full time as Six Sigma expert practitioners who would oversee project deployment while their positions were backfilled.

Assessment

The Six Sigma deployment was the right decision. More than 50 projects were initiated with significant success. An example of an early Mount Carmel success story is the dramatic improvement in their Medicare + Choice product reimbursements, previously written off as uncollectible accounts. These accounts were often denied by HCFA due to coding of those patients as “working aged.”

Since the treatment process status often changed in these patients, HCFA often rejected claims or lessened reimbursement amounts, effectively making coding a difficult and elusive problem. The employment of the Six Sigma process fixed the problem, resulting in a real gain of $857,000 to the organization. The spillover of this methodology to other coding parameters also has dramatically boosted revenue collection.

A Glimpse of Lean Medical Management Tools and Techniques

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Hospitals: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

From Our Newest Textbook Release

Buy from Amazon

Learn How to Profit and Thrive in the PP-ACA Era

BOOK FOREWORD / TESTIMONIAL

Opinion Poll on the Most Disruptive Health Issue Today?

Join Our Mailing List

A Voting Opinion Poll

Today’s opinion poll for all modern hospital executives, financial advisors, health economists, patients and physician leaders is right on-point.

It was sent in by an astute ME-P subscriber and we are most pleased to oblige.

VOTE HERE

And so, what is the most singular disruptive development that you should be thinking about if you want your medical practice, clinic, hospital, state, local government or healthcare organization to thrive in the coming years?

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Hospitals: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Product Details  Product Details

Product Details

The Integrated Patient-Centered Medical Home Model

Join Our Mailing List

Tools for Transforming Our Healthcare

By Matias A. Klein

[VP, General Manager, Clinical Quality and Collaboration, Portico Systems]

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) continues to attract increasing attention from many industry stakeholders. The PCMH model has the potential to enhance the US healthcare system by rejuvenating primary care in a way that improves clinical outcomes, lowers costs, promotes wellness, and increases patient and physician satisfaction.

PCMH Pilot Programs

PCMH pilots are currently being tested in almost all states, including a 3-year Medicare medical home demonstration project overseen by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. However, few organizations have scaled the PCMH across their entire healthcare network, and the existing implementations appear to remain focused on care management at the expense of patient wellness. The value of focusing equally on promoting wellness (although an underappreciated nuance in the implementation of a PCMH) is a critical factor in effectively leveraging the PCMH model to improve clinical outcomes and the US healthcare system.

Centered on the Patient

The PCMH model, as its name suggests, is centered on the patient. The underlying thought is that if a comprehensive, longitudinal view of a patient is taken throughout a patient’s lifespan, the patient’s health could be better “managed” and better aligned with best medical practices. It is well documented that physicians do not consistently or frequently apply evidence based, recommended care to patients. Therefore, a major goal of the PCMH model is to improve the consistent application of evidence-based guidelines and best practices, by making longitudinal information about the patient available to providers and to patients – including any risks and recommended “intervention opportunities.” And although adherence to best practices in disease management is crucial, the PCMH model also focuses on preventing costly episodes by promoting and incentivizing wellness.

PCPs = Medical Homes

To effectively manage a patient’s health and promote wellness, primary care physicians – designated as medical homes – need to act as health “quarterbacks” or “coaches.” In such a role, these physicians will assist in aggregating a patient’s health information, making best practices transparent, offering health education and counseling, as well as coordinating the provisioning of any healthcare services the patient may need. With physicians spending significant time coaching and making critical clinical decisions, these services will be delivered with the support of care management nurses, who will handle the majority of the information processing and operational activity.

An Innovation in Care

The PCMH model is an important innovation in care delivery and has the potential to reduce medical and administrative costs, while improving the quality of care. However, how to implement the PCMH model within a care-delivery system remains unclear. Providers need the requisite infrastructure and capabilities at their locations to meaningfully participate in a PCMH. Patients must be engaged over long periods of time in proactively managing and improving their health. Outcomes and quality must be objectively measured to optimize the delivery of best possible patient care.

Potential Value

To realize the potential value of the PCMH, three distinct stakeholders – patients, providers, and health plans – must work in a collaborative way. Getting these stakeholders synchronized (i.e., aligned in their goals, using interoperable tools, and collaborating on an operational level) is no small feat but can be accomplished with the smart application of technology. Bringing these three stakeholder groups together on a common, collaborative technology platform results in what some are beginning to call the integrated PCMH. The integrated approach to the PCMH can best ensure that implementing a PCMH model does not create additional administrative burdens to health plans or provider organizations.

An integrated PCMH provides a framework for stakeholders to collaborate in a transparent fashion, and where quality, best practices, and outcomes are incentivized. The integrated PCMH also provides a pathway being awarded a medical home designation.

Vertical Integration Deployment

The key to deploying an integrated PCMH is an end-to-end vertical integration of the care-delivery process – that is, a process in which the provider network management, automation, information exchange, and analytics solutions are tightly integrated with patient and provider information. With so much complexity and so many “moving parts” in the delivery of the PCMH model, this end-to-end vertical integration is a practical solution that enables effective coordination of care and accurate measurement of quality: with such system integration, the provider network (e.g., the health plan) can bring economies of scale to even the smallest provider offices to optimize the quality of care delivery.

The 5 Keys

The five key components for such an integrated PCMH are:

  1. A source-of-truth for mapping medical home – designated providers, patients, as well as  the associated relationships with health plans and other medical professionals; a central medical home fact checking is critical for effectively identifying, managing, and communicating with medical home and their networks.
  2. A set of collaborative workflows that align stakeholders with best practices, incentives, and quality measures reporting; these collaborative workflows help each stakeholder understand where a given patient is in the care-delivery process, potential intervention opportunities, why certain interventions are being emphasized, and what incentives are available for executing specific interventions.
  3. An infrastructure for clinical integration and distribution of intervention opportunities, clinical reference content, education, alerts, and reminders. This infrastructure allows all stakeholders to have access to up-to-date, accurate patient information; it aligns stakeholders and helps reduce or eliminate duplication of procedures and tests.
  4. Interoperable clinical applications and collaboration tools to enable patients and physicians to engage in medical home processes; these tools – which include electronic medical records, e-prescribing, e-labs, secure e-mail, personal health records, and document management and exchange technology – can help manage health information, assist with decision-making, and improve communication between patients, providers, and health plans.
  5. Incentive management and analytics tools for modeling, setting, measuring, and rewarding incentives based on quality measures and outcomes; these tools must span the entire PCMH delivery process and are required for objectively evaluating and optimizing the performance of a medical home.

When considering the multiplicity of stakeholders, information, software systems, and knowledge that has to be coordinated in the context of a PCMH model, implementing a medical home pilot and scaling it to a full-blown network may seem a daunting task. The integrated PCMH offers a real-world solution for deploying a scalable and flexible infrastructure for the management of this emerging care-delivery model.

Assessment

Early evaluations of the PCMH model show promising, albeit inconclusive, outcomes. The integrated PCMH model offers a practical road map for deploying a management system that will enable objective measurement of PCMH performance and outcomes.

Conclusion

Although the jury is still out on the ultimate value of the PCMH, deploying an integrated PCMH system can help position PCMH pilots in a way that enhances their flexibility and scalability to support full-scale network transformation.

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details

Product Details 

How to Prevent Hospital Re-Admissions?

Join Our Mailing List

ME-P Reader Survey

[By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA CMP™]

As our physician readers are aware, beginning in 2013, CMS will penalize hospitals for excess readmission rates.

Initial focus will be on readmissions for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction and pneumonia — data that is already reported on the CMS Hospital Compare web site, as previously noted on this ME-P forum.

How to Reduce Hospital Re-Admissions

As private payers follow CMS’s reimbursement and reporting leads, healthcare organizations must take bold steps to reduce avoidable readmissions.

A Call to Action

And so, we invite our medical professional readers to report on their initiatives and tips in this area, and deliver actionable data in order to help hospitals and healthcare organizations reduce avoidable readmissions.

Assessment

Please tell us and your colleagues, what you are doing and plan to do, in the changing future of healthcare.

Re

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

   Product Details

Accountable Care Organizations are Here

The Final Federal Guidelines

By Garfunkel Wild PC

http://www.garfunkelwild.com

Join Our Mailing List

The much anticipated final federal regulations on accountable care organizations (ACOs) were published on October 20th, 2011. The Affordable Care Act created ACOs to deliver seamless, high quality care to traditional fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries while reducing the cost of care to those beneficiaries. If successful, ACOs will receive a portion of the shared savings they achieve for the Medicare program.

ACO Workgroup 

The Garfunkel Wild ACO Workgroup is in the process of analyzing these final regulations, and we will be hosting a webinar in the near future to discuss ACO participation and other ways providers can move towards collaborative care.

Final Regulations

In reviewing the final regulations, it is clear CMS took public comments to their proposed regulations seriously and made significant changes that should strengthen the ACO program. Some of these changes include:

  • Allowing ACOs to participate in an upside shared savings track (without being subject to downside losses) for the first three years of participation
  • Expanding the definition of participants eligible to form ACOs to include federally qualified health centers (“FQHCs”)
  • Reducing by about half the number of quality measures ACOs have to report
  • Permitting ACOs to share in first dollar saved once a minimum savings rate is achieved
  • Creating more flexibility for start dates for ACOs beginning in 2012
  • Removing EHR readiness as a condition of participation
  • Revising the process of assigning beneficiaries to ACOs from a pure retrospective process to a prospective process that includes retroactive adjustments

Assessment

Also published with the CMS final regulations were interim final regulations published by the Office of Inspector General addressing the waiver of the application of federal fraud and abuse laws; a final policy statement issued by the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice outlining the agencies’ antitrust enforcement policies for ACOs, and an IRS Fact Sheet regarding tax exempt organizations participating in the Medicare Shared Savings program.

Conclusion                

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product Details

Health-Care Reform Rules Would Restrict Public Reporting

 Information Restricted to “qualified entities” Only

By Marshall Allen

ProPublica, Sept 15th, 2011, 10:46 am

Join Our Mailing List

It’s estimated that hundreds of thousands of patients die annually from preventable harm suffered while undergoing medical care. The infections, injuries and errors could rank as a leading cause of death in the United States.

The PP-ACA of 2010

Last year’s sweeping health-care reform law — the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — promised to improve the problem by allowing outside groups to use Medicare billing records to analyze and publicly report on the quality of care. But proposed rules that would guide the release of the data are being criticized by consumer groups that say the rules would make independent accountability impossible.

CMS  

Agencies typically adopt rules to administer laws like the health-care act. The rules being developed [1] by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) propose restricting the release of Medicare billing data to “qualified entities.” To qualify, a group would have to:

  • Pay up to $200,000 for the data.
  • Have its methods pre-approved before obtaining the data.
  • Already possess billing information from other sources to combine with the Medicare data — an advantage to insurance companies.
  • Limit public reporting to quality measures approved by the health-care industry.
  • Present its reports and findings to every doctor and facility being measured before they are released to the public — a requirement that would make large-scale reports difficult.

Medicare officials declined to discuss the proposed rules because they are being finalized after a public comment period ended Aug. 8th. But interviews and a review of comments show that the rules have sharply divided consumer-oriented groups and health-care providers.

Safe Patient Project

Lisa McGiffert, director of the Safe Patient Project run by Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports magazine, said the new law was seen as “a real opportunity” because, for the first time, Medicare data could be used to tell the public about the performance of doctors. But the proposed rules would make it impossible for Consumers Union to use the data, she said.

“The best-kept secret inAmericais what doctors are doing,” McGiffert said. “People should be able to find out information about outcomes of care, whether their docs are using appropriate practices and whether they’re providing too much of something that people don’t need.”

Bruce Boissonnault, president and CEO of the Niagara Health Quality Coalition, a nonprofit that’s been independently measuring the quality of health care since 1995, said the rules are needlessly complex and designed to suppress freedom of information. He said the rules would make it impossible for all but industry insiders to access the new data, giving them control over what’s released.

“We will only see the scraps of information that the industry wants us to discuss,” Boissonnault said. “It’s advertising wrapped in a lab coat.”

Boissonnault [2] and Consumers Union [3] submitted public comments, urging Medicare to reconsider the restrictions.

Enter the AMA

The American Medical Association submitted comments [4] mostly supporting the access limitations and in some cases urging more restrictive rules. For instance, the proposed rules say doctors would need 30 days to review any analysis before it’s publicly reported, but the AMA wants that review period increased to 90 days. The AMA also wants Medicare to consider complaints by physicians against an organization before allowing the organization access to the data.

Assessment

The Federation of American Hospitals, which represents investor-owned health-care facilities, said in its comment [5] that it is “very troubled” by the proposed rules, despite the increased restrictions, because billing data have a limited ability to measure quality. The federation wants a limit on the number of qualified entities that have access to the data.

Link: http://www.propublica.org/article/health-care-reform-rules-would-restrict-public-reporting

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details

Medicare and the Budget Control Act’s Joint Select Committee

Creating Spending Reductions for the Next Decade?

By Children’s Home Society of Florida Foundation

Join Our Mailing List 

Under the compromise between President Obama and leaders of the House and Senate, the Budget Control Act of 2011 created spending reductions of over $900 billion during the next decade. The bill also requires leaders of the House and Senate to appoint members to a Joint Select Committee. The committee has three Republican, three Democratic Senators, three Republican and three Democratic Representatives.

House and Senate leaders have now appointed the committee members. The 12 committee members are tasked with creating a $1.5 trillion budget solution by Thanksgiving. Their bill will be voted on without amendments by December 23, 2011.

If the committee is not able to develop and pass a bill by Dec. 23, there will be $1.2 trillion in budget cuts. Half of the cuts will come from the Department of Defense and one-half will be reductions in payments to Medicare providers.

Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) appointed three Senators. The Co-Chair of the Joint Select Committee will be Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA). His other two appointees are Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) and Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT). Sen. Kerry is Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Sen. Baucus is Chair of the Senate Finance Committee.

Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) appointed Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ), Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH). Sen. Kyl is the Republican Whip and a senior member of the Finance Committee. Sen. Toomey is a member of the Budget Committee. Sen. Portman was previously Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) appointed Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) as Co-Chair of the committee. His other appointments are Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI) and Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI). Rep. Camp is Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee and Rep. Upton chairs the Energy and Commerce Committee.

Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) appointed Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC), House Ways and Means Member Xavier Becerra (D-CA) and Budget Committee Member Chris Van Hollen (D-MD).

The Joint Select Committee is expected to initiate meetings in September after Congress returns from the August recess.

Editor’s Note: There will undoubtedly be a spirited debate. All of the twelve committee members will want to avoid drastic budget cuts for the Department of Defense or Medicare providers. The group will need to discuss potential cuts in discretionary expenditures, defense and entitlements. With the appointments of key taxwriters Baucus and Camp, it is clear that taxes will also be a part of the discussion. Whether or not there are tax increases as part of the budget solution remains to be seen.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

 

About the Health Indicators Warehouse

Enabling Health Journalists

By Staff Reporters

Join Our Mailing List

The Role of Health Journalists

Health journalists have a key role to play making health care safer and informing the public. To help them, CMS Chief Donald Berwick MD recently unveiled a new government website, the “Health Indicators Warehouse. The site offers abundant data including information never released before in an easily accessible form, including patient safety data, preventive health care indicators, Medicare payment claims and hospital performance at the state and hospital referral region level. Information is searchable by topic, location, health outcomes among other factors.

Purpose

The purpose of the HIW is to:

  • Provide a single, user-friendly, source for national, state, and community health indicators
  • Meet needs of multiple population health initiatives
  • Facilitate harmonization of indicators across initiatives
  • Link indicators with evidence-based interventions
  • Serve as the data hub for the HHS Community Health Data Initiative, a flagship HHS open government initiative to release data; encourage innovative application development; and catalyze change to improve community health.

Partners

The HIW is a collaboration of many Agencies and Offices within the Department of Health and Human Services. The HIW is maintained by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. Data, support and funding are provided by the following:

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
  • Department of Health and Human Services:
    • Office of the Deputy Secretary
    • Office of Adolescent Health
    • Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
    • Office of Minority Health
    • Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
  • Health Resources and Services Administration.

New partners are expected to be added over time.

HIW v1.0

The first version of the HIW (v1.0) contains the following content and functionalities:

  • Pre-constructed national, state, and local level indicators including:
    • Healthy People 2020 indicators
    • County Health Rankings indicators
    • Community Health Status Indicators (CHSI) indicators
    • Medicare quality and utilization indicators
  • Ability to map, chart, graph, and trend indicators (to the extent data allow)
  • Links from indicators to evidence-based interventions
  • Web services—peer-to-peer/business application capability
  • Supporting descriptive indicator definitions, methods, data sources and other descriptive data needed to facilitate appropriate use of indicators.

HIW Future Releases

Over time new indicators will be added, and some existing indicators will be modified or dropped from the HIW. They do not anticipate including individual-level data in the future. The process for proposing new indicators or modifying existing indicators will be described in the near future.

In addition, as resources permit, new functionalities will be added, such as additional mapping and charting capabilities, and simple analytic tools.

For More Information:

Email: HealthIndicators@cdc.gov

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko 

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

Is Informatics the The Curse of Healthcare Reform?

Join Our Mailing List

Medical Coding Complications and Greed

[By Darrell K. Pruitt DDS]

Coding complications in government healthcare ALWAYS favor the house — CMS guarantees it with lawsuits and whistleblower rewards that could attract dishonest employees. Are you careful who you hire?

Complications 

Complications in healthcare informatics – including 5-digit CPT® code mistakes as well as foul-ups that involve physicians’ “voluntary” 10-digit National Provider Identifier numbers – ALWAYS grant insurers more time to pay past-due bills owed to their clients and their clients’ doctors.

Call me Cynical 

Call me cynical, but if interest rates climb ever higher as predicted, watch for unexplained, proportional increases in coding errors to help fund insurance CFOs’ bonuses while raising the cost of healthcare even more without improving value. Is it any wonder why Americans don’t get the quality of healthcare we purchase compared to citizens in other countries? Tax-payers in my neighborhood are begging for in-network providers who put their patients’ interests ahead of insurers’ as much as allowed by insurers’ self-serving rules – without committing fraud. As a general rule, healthcare stakeholders accommodate parasites more than principals.

CPT® Codes and Patient Care 

Accurate CPT® coding may have nothing to do with patient care, but CMS makes it nevertheless important to physicians. Whereas the most innocent NPI foul-ups reliably delay payment and never turn out well for providers, the new fraud and abuse provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act [ACA] can cause an innocent coding mistake on a Medicare claim to land the doc in court with charges of fraud depending on the quality of employees one hires – but only if the error favors the provider and not the payer. In June, David Burda posted “Attorney tells audience to brace for a storm of whistle-blower lawsuits” on ModernHealthcare.com.

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100623/NEWS/306209989/-1

Of Whistle-Blower Lawsuits

Burda reports that healthcare attorney Joanne Judge, a partner with Stevens & Lee in Reading, Pa., predicts a significant increase in whistle-blower lawsuits simply because the new law makes it far too easy for a dishonest employee to file an unwarranted lawsuit. No longer is there a requirement for the whistleblower, who stands to win money from his or her patriotic effort, to directly witness the crime. That kind of idea could catch on in this economy.

computer-hardware1

“The new law also converts accidental Medicare overpayments to providers into potential false claims, Judge said. She said the law considers an overpayment as fraud if the overpayment isn’t identified by the provider and returned to the government within 60 days. Judge said that will require providers to beef up their internal billing systems to detect an overpayment as soon as possible and then send Medicare back its money.”

Assessment 

What can possibly go wrong with that plan? Thorough background checks on all new employees is increasingly important, doc. For my employment security issues, I’ve learned to depend on Richard at Investigation Resource Service out of Dallas. He’s never let me down (This is not a paid ad).

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details 

The Medicare Cost-Control Efficiency Paradox

Essay on the Eight-Hundred Pound Gorilla in the Medical Treatment Room

By Dr. David E. Marcinko MBA

[Editor-in-Chief]

According to economist Austin Frakt PhD, and others, there is a school of thought that says Congress is incapable of controlling costs in the Medicare and Medicaid System [CMS].

And, then there is the reality known by all practicing medical professionals regardless of specialty orientation or degree designation. That is to say, CMS really can control healthcare costs and with great ferocity and efficiency, and to non-public sectors as well …. PARADOXICAL?

On Getting What You Wish For

Blogger Ezra Klein opines that one of the dirty little secrets of the health-care system is that Medicare has done a much better job controlling costs than private health insurers.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/11/what_happens_when_medicare_con.html

A Forehead-Palm Moment

Of course, we doctors know that the real problem is that Medicare seemingly [think Seinfeld’s character George Costanza] controls costs all too well; but not really. It is just that CMS pays doctors too little and thus it appears costs are controlled. What really is happening is that physician fees are being reduced carte’ blanche.

Nevertheless, and regardless of semantics, CMS will never control costs much more efficiently than private insurance companies or doctors will simply abandon Medicare for related payment models like direct reimbursement or concierge medicine. This is happening right now. Physicians, osteopaths and podiatrists etc, are opting out of Medicare in increasingly large numbers. In a world where there’s only Medicare and Medicare to control costs, doctors can either take the pay cut or stop seeing patients, and stop being doctors. “Taking what they are given – because they’re working for a livin.”

So sorry that this seems like a forehead-palm moment for Ezra, but not for healthcare practitioners or the ME-P!

Too Much Demand Elsewhere

And, as we see from other countries, many young bright folks want to be doctors, even if being a doctor doesn’t make one particularly wealthy [high demand and high eventual supply produces lower provider costs in the long term?]. Think medical tourism.

Not so much the case anymore in this country [lower demand and lower eventual supply produces higher reimbursement costs to the doctor survivors in the very long term?].

Our Domestic World

But, we are not elsewhere. In fact, in our present domestic healthcare ecosystem, when Medicare decides to control costs, many doctors can simply stop accepting Medicare patients, and the politicians will lose their jobs. One political party then declares that Medicare is rationing and will hurt senior citizens. The other party capitulates and pays MDs more [SGR]. Then, the federal budget looks bad as it does now. The circle is complete when one party asserts that Medicare actually can’t contain costs but the private insurance companies will.  It all fails, in an unending circular Boolean-like loop of illogic.

Listen Up!

So, listen up AARP, politicians, CMS and seniors as I admonish you to be careful what you wish for [medical cost controls]. It might just come true. As Ezra rightly says; rinse, repeat – rinse, repeat – ad nausea. You simply can’t have it both ways.  You either choose to spend less and offend certain cohorts, or spend more and offend different factions.  Either way, you’re going to piss someone off. A good healthcare reimbursement system would try to make that decision rationally [a-politically]. But, at least it would make an economics driven decision; wouldn’t it?

Assessment

Is CMS really the eight hundred pound cost-controlled gorilla in the increasingly large Medicare treatment room? Why or why not? Now, relative to the ACA of 2010, please read: The Case for Public Plan Choice in National Health Reform [Key to Cost Control and Quality Coverage], by Jacob S. Hacker, PhD. Link: Jacob Hacker Public Plan Choice

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Do we have a Medicare cost control efficiency paradox? Or, are the economists just reveling in the publication banal? Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

     Product Details 

The ME-P Recommends: Financial Planning and Risk Management Handbooks

Product Details  Product Details

ADVERTISEMENT

1 in 7 Hospitalized Medicare Beneficiaries Harmed by their Health Care?

According to a New Government Report

By Marian Wang

ProPublica, Nov: 16, 2010, 3:30 pm

Join Our Mailing List 

One out of every seven hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries experiences an “adverse event,” which means the patient is harmed as a result of medical care. That’s according to a study released today [1] by the Department of Health and Human Services’ inspector general. The “adverse events” contribute to an estimated 15,000 patient deaths [2] each month and add at least $4.4 billion [3] to the government’s annual Medicare expenses, the report projected. These findings were based on a nationally representative random sample taken from the nearly 1 million Medicare beneficiaries discharged from hospitals in October 2008.

The report’s findings were “consistent with previous studies” but “nonetheless disturbing [4],” Carolyn Clancy, director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, said in a written response to the report.

Medicare and Medicaid chief Donald Berwick, in a separate response, said that his agency is working to improve care not only for hospitalized patients, but is also trying to address “issues in dialysis centers and ambulatory and long term care settings.”

Inspector General Report

It’s interesting that he mentions this. Because the inspector general report only covered hospital care, the statistics it contains don’t include many of the adverse events we’ve reported on in a particular subset of Medicare beneficiaries—patients receiving care in dialysis clinics [5].

Examples:

But, the report did highlight the story of one hospitalized dialysis patient who almost died when the tube feeding blood back into his body dislodged—an incident that as we’ve noted, is potentially deadly but also preventable [6]: [O]ne beneficiary had excessive bleeding after his kidney dialysis needle was inadvertently removed, which resulted in circulatory shock, a transfer to the intensive care unit, and emergency insertion of a tube into the trachea (windpipe) to ease breathing. When the tube was removed the following day, the patient aspirated (inhaled foreign material into his lungs), which required a life-sustaining intervention.

Assessment

Of the adverse events it identified, the inspector general’s report judged about 44 percent to be preventable. The inspector general called on both the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to broaden the definition of adverse events and better measure such incidents, noting that “to date, no adverse event reporting system exists, and there are no Federal standards regarding State systems.”

Link: http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/read-govt-report-showing-1-in-7-hospitalized-medicare-beneficiaries-harmed-

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com and http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

 

Brief Summary of “Meaningful-Use” for eHRs

Objectives Listed

By Shahid N. Shah MS

www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com

In 2009, the ARRA HITECH bill coined the term “meaningful use” and was a game-changer in the healthcare IT industry. In a series of regulations, the Recovery Act specifically required the following.

Summary of MU

Here are the substantive Meaningful Use objectives of the new ARRA HITECH bill:

  • Use Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE).
  • Implement drug-drug, drug-allergy, drug-formulary checks.
  • Maintain an up-to-date problem list of current and active diagnoses based on ICD-9-CM or SNOMED CT®.
  • Maintain active medication list.
  • Maintain active medication allergy list.
  • Record demographics.
  • Record and chart changes in vital signs.
  • Record smoking status for patients 13 years and older.
  • Incorporate clinical lab-test results into EHR as structured data.
  • Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to use for quality improvement, reduction of disparities, and outreach. This is a common feature in EHRs.
  • Report ambulatory quality measures to CMS or the States.
  • Implement 5 clinical decision support rules relevant to specialty or high clinical priority, including diagnostic test ordering, along with the ability to track compliance with those rules.
  • Check insurance eligibility electronically from public and private payers.
  • Submit claims electronically to public and private payers.
  • Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information upon request.
  • Capability to electronically exchange key clinical information among providers of care and patient-authorized entities.
  • Perform medication reconciliation at relevant encounters and each transition of care.
  • Provide summary care record for each transition of care and referral.
  • Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries and actual submission where required and accepted.
  • Capability to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and actual transmission according to applicable law and practice.
  • Protect electronic health information created or maintained by the certified EHR technology through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities
  • Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically.
  • Send reminders to patients per patient preference for preventive/follow-up care.
  • Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information within 96 hours of information being available to the EP.
  • Provide clinical summaries for patients for each office visit.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

 

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Content Exchange and Vocabulary Standards for eMRs

Understanding Terms and Definitions

By Shahid N. Shah MS

As per the HHS rules, vocabulary standards are standardized nomenclatures and e-code sets used to describe clinical problems and procedures, medications, and allergies for eMRs. Some commons terms and definitions are listed below:

Terms and Definitions

  • ASTM’s CCR – for most of your basic patient summary exchange needs the CCR will meet your needs. If you’re moving from low or no interoperability today to some interoperable capabilities then CCR is your best starting place.
  • International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modifications (ICD-9- CM) or SNOMED CT® should populate a problem list. If you’re not familiar with both standards and are unsure where to start, go with ICD-9 for problem lists. SNOMED is not commonly supported in the broad EMR industry but ICD-9 support is quite common so start there.
  • Health Level Seven (HL7) Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) Release 2 (R2) Level 2 CCD – for more advanced patient summary exchange needs the HL7 CDA is recommended. If you’re already supporting CCR exchange and it’s not meeting your needs then HL7 CDA is the next logical place to go.
  • For patient summary exchanges, HHS expect the following fields to be populated: problem list; medication list; medication allergy list; procedures; vital signs; units of measure; lab orders and results; and, where appropriate, discharge summary.
  • ICD-9-CM [ACD-10] or American Medical Association (AMA) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) Fourth Edition (CPT–4) to populate information related to procedures. Both of these standards are support broadly by most existing vendors so going with either or both is good.
  • For medication lists, HHS requires the use of codes from a drug vocabulary the National Library of Medicine has identified as an RxNorm drug data source provider with a complete data set integrated within RxNorm.
  • For lab results, HHS requires the use of LOINC® to populate information in a patient summary record related to lab orders and results when LOINC® codes have been received from a laboratory and are retained and subsequently available in your EMR. HHS states that in instances where LOINC® codes have not been received from a laboratory, the use of any local or proprietary code is permitted. HHS does not require these local or proprietary codes to be converted to LOINC® codes in order to populate a patient summary record.
  • For the purposes of electronic prescribing, your vendor must be capable of using NCPDP SCRIPT 8.1 or NCPDP SCRIPT 8.1 and 10.6. With respect to a vocabulary standard, your vendor must use codes from a drug vocabulary currently integrated into the NLM’s RxNorm. For the purposes of performing a drug formulary check, your vendor must be capable of using NCPDP Formulary & Benefits Standard 1.0 adopted by HHS (73 FR 18918).
  • There are standards required for insurance data like eligibility checking and submissions of claims. ASC X12N and NCPDP standards (Versions 4010/4010A and 5010 and Versions 5.1 and D.0, respectively) should be used for these transactions. It’s important to realize that Version 4010 is being phased out in favor of Version 5010 so your vendors need to support both at this time and must be able to move exclusively to Version 5010 in the future.
  • For the purposes of electronically submitting calculated quality measures required by CMS or by States, your vendor must be capable of using the CMS PQRI 2008 Registry XML Specification. Going forward, HL7 Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA) Implementation Guide based on HL7 CDA Release 2 may be allowed but for now focus on the CMS PQRI requirements until HHS provides more guidance in the future.
  • For the purposes of submitting lab results to public health agencies, your vendor must be capable of using HL7 2.5.1.
  • For the purposes of electronically submitting information to public health agencies for surveillance and reporting, your vendor must be capable of using HL7 2.3.1 or HL7 2.5.1 as a content exchange standard. At this time HHS not required adverse event reporting nor have they adopted a specific vocabulary standard for submitting information to public health agencies for surveillance and reporting.
  • For the purposes of electronically submitting information to immunization registries your vendor must be capable of using HL7 2.3.1 or HL7 2.5.1 as a content exchange standard and the CDC maintained HL7 standard code set CVX -Vaccines Administered18 as the vocabulary standard.

Assessment

www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.  

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com and http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko 

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

More on the Meaningful Use of eMRs

Join Our Mailing List

Final Meaningful Use Rules Released by HHS on July 13, 2010.

[By Shahid N. Shah MS]

Link: http://shahid.shah.org

For ambulatory care practices and physicians there are about 25 objectives and measures that must be met to become a “meaningful user”. Keep in mind that meaningful use is not tied to a certified EHR alone; in fact, unless you use the EHR properly and in all the ways the government wants you to, you will not be a “meaningful user”. Don’t be fooled by EHR vendors guaranteeing that they will make you a “meaningful user” – no vendor’s software, no matter how nice, can get your staff to use the software in the way the government wants. You, as the CIO of your practice, are the only one that can guarantee that. In fact, you don’t even need an EHR from a vendor to meet the requirements – you can even roll your own, use open source, or find any other means. But, in general, as long as you can attest and send data to the government that they require you can do it in any way that you want. Be aware that some unscrupulous vendors are scaring practices and making promises that they cannot keep.

Final MU Rules

The final Meaningful Use (MU) Rule was published by HHS on July 13, 2010. It defines 24 objectives for and measures eligible hospitals that could be met to become a meaningful user and qualify for incentive funding. There is a “core set” that must be met by all institutions and a “menu set” of from which organizations must implement at least 5 objectives.

Core Set Objectives

These are the “core set” of 14 objectives that must be met by all institutions and a “menu set” of 10 from which organizations must implement at least 5 objectives (at least 1 public health objective must be chosen from that set).

  1. Use Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE).
  2. Implement drug-drug, drug-allergy, and drug-formulary checks.
  3. Record demographics.
  4. Implement one clinical decision support rule.
  5. Maintain a problem list of current and active Dxs based on ICD-9-CM or SNOMED CT.
  6. Maintain active medication list.
  7. Maintain active medication allergy list.
  8. Record and chart changes in vital signs.
  9. Record smoking status for patients 13 years or older.
  10. Report hospital clinical quality measures to CMS or States.
  11. Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information, upon request.
  12. Provide patients an e-copy of discharge instructions at time of discharge, upon request.
  13. Exchange key clinical e-information among providers and patient-authorized entities.
  14. Protect electronic health information.

Menu Set Objectives

These are the “menu set” of 10 objectives from which organizations must implement at least 5. At least one public health objective must be chosen from this set as well (numbers 8, 9, or 10).

  1. Drug-formulary checks.
  2. Record advanced directives for patients 65 years or older.
  3. Incorporate clinical lab test results as structured data.
  4. Generate lists of patients by specific conditions.
  5. Use certified eHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide to patient, if appropriate.
  6. Medication reconciliation.
  7. Summary of care record for each transition of care/referrals.
  8. Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries/systems.
  9. Capability to provide electronic submission of reportable lab results to public health agencies.
  10. Capability to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies.

Assessment

As can be seen in the link below, the Office of the National Coordinator for Healthcare IT (ONCHIT) is a component of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ONCHIT, usually abbreviated just ONC, is the principal policy group of the Federal Government that defines and manages NHIN.

  • ONC is responsible for coordinating with the Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the specifications for the NHIN standards.
  • The HIT Policy and HIT Standards Committees are the working groups that advise ONC on what to put in the standards.
  • NIST is responsible for coming up with the test materials (assertions, procedures, methods, tools, data, and so on) that will be used to certify working systems.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details 

An Open Letter to the TDA Council on Ethics

And … Judicial Affairs

By Darrell K. Pruitt DDS

Dear Dr. Roy N. Burk – Chairman

In your email to me on Thursday, you informed me that you would call my office this week at your convenience to discuss the as yet to be defined complaints about my “unprofessional conduct” from unnamed origins – some of which are rumored to be as old as three years. Also in your reply that was days late, you confirmed my suspicion that you rarely check your email (even though you provided your address). That is why I asked the manager of the TDA Twitter account to send you the message not to call my office. I’ve given her another message today to tell you to check you email. You said you prefer to have a phone conversation with me. However, I naturally decline because of obvious reasons such as inconvenience, misinterpretations and limited exchange of information.

Foundation of our Nation

The foundation of our nation was defined in carefully chosen words written by Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine and others. You have to admit that writing is a much more meaningful and efficient way to resolve the TDA’s mistake than with a 5 minute phone conversation. In addition, by working out our misunderstanding in meaningful sentences that can be viewed by all, both of us are much less likely to say something we might regret if our conversation gets heated… which it will. After all, you threatened my reputation in my community, Dr. Roy Burk. And for that reason, I intend to hold you personally accountable in your community if Judicial Case No. 12-2010-3 is not dismissed. Fair is fair.

Let’s Talk 

Things said in anger help nobody, and can be completely avoided with the written word. In short, there is no reason for either our phone conversation or the meeting you have planned for me on September 18. We can all do something else on that Saturday rather than waste the morning in an Omni Fort Worth hotel room. That is, if you are more interested in resolution than punishment. So let’s negotiate this mistake quickly and quietly, but in a transparent manner, Dr. Burk. As Dr. David May said (but did not mean) when he took over as TDA President in 2007, “Let’s talk.”

TDA Censorship? 

The issue at hand is clearly TDA censorship for political reasons rather than “unprofessionalism.” Trust me when I tell you that nobody who is following us is fooled by the kangaroo court you propose. Considering the recent NLRB decision against the TDA for mistreating employees, the TDA is no longer considered an ethically run organization by many. That means your credibility is shot from the beginning. This week, Jan Jarvis, whom I’m sharing this email with, published “Fort Worth medical clinic spends $15,000 notifying patients of theft” in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.”

http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/08/06/2389717/fort-worth-medical-clinic-spends.html#ixzz0wIaU5AQa

My Community 

This is my community. Some of my patients are (or rather were) also patients of the local allergy clinic where computers containing 25,000 patients’ PHI were stolen in a burglary. In the end, the data breach will cost the clinic hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost customers because of the bad publicity, in addition to possible HIPAA fines and perhaps a lawsuit from Texas Attorney General Gregg Abbott. Yet, the TDA has still failed to warn members of the liability of their computers. There is simply no excuse for the TDA’s neglect, and punishing me for revealing the truth will not help anyone, and it aggravates me. That said, please allow me to show you exactly how the TDA’s censorship is hurting dentists as well as endangering their patients in Texas – even as we speak: One year ago today, I posted the following article concerning the liabilities of data breaches on the TDA’s Facebook. It is one of many cautionary articles I contributed about data breaches, electronic dental records and HIPAA. However, the TDA as well as the ADA has ignored the exploding identity theft problem because of undisclosed allegiances to entities other than dentists and patients. The behavior of my professional organization is counter to the Hippocratic Oath and indefensible.

In October, an unnamed person in the TDA determined that TDA members should be prevented from reading the following information.

TDA Facebook, August 11, 2009

HITECH/HIPAA Breach notification

On August 18, American dentists will hear from HHS that HITECH-empowered HIPAA now requires that patients be notified if a breach includes their identifiers. Most will be surprised to learn that the notification requirement is nothing new. The law has been there for years. Besides the law, everyone has to admit that notifying those whose welfare is at risk is the only ethical thing to do, even if it bankrupts a practice. And that is the problem. Breach notification will bankrupt a dental practice. The law has been around for years. It simply never was enforced by either HHS or CMS because it would be so devastating to small medical and dental practices. I assume that the shoddy enforcement is why the ADA did not see a need to distribute discouraging information about the HIPAA requirement. For some reason, the ADA supported the adoption of HIPAA. Some day we’ll know why.  This is not the first time I’ve brought up the breach notification topic on a TDA publication. At the first of 2007, the TDA ventured into the blogosphere with “Ask a Colleague” Forum as part of the TDA’s Website. I began to take over the forum with a contribution posted on January 13, 2008 which I copied below. It is a snail-mail letter I received from President-elect Dr. John S. Findley, describing for the only time in ADA history, the ADA’s Data Breach protocol.

ADA Resources? 

As you can see from the hard work put into the letter, it took a considerable amount of ADA dues to produce this response for only one ADA member. Nevertheless, my question was not taken lightly because they probably assumed it would show up again. And, they were correct. Even though the leaders failed to share it with other ADA members, before it was forgotten, it was cc’d to

  • Dr. S. Jerry Long, trustee, Fifteenth District
  • Dr. James Bramson, executive director
  • Ms. Mary Logan, chief operative officer
  • Ms. Tamra Kempf, chief legal counsel
  • Ms. Mary Kay Linn, executive director, Texas Dental Association

Two and a half years later, Findley’s letter is current enough to be posted with only minor changes. For example, Dr. James Bramson and Ms. Mary Logan no longer work for the ADA.

One more note about Dr. Findley’s response to my question, I did not misrepresent myself in my email to him that I had a computer stolen. He knew from six months earlier when I first emailed him my question that it was a hypothetical question about an obscure topic that ADA leaders did not want to talk about.

Posted: 13 Jan 2008 10:05 AM on the TDA.org Forum

Data breach protocol announced

On January 8th, Dr. John S. Findley, President-elect of the American Dental Association, signed the letter below which defines a data breach, describes a dentist’s obligation under the law in Texas to notify patients involved and the penalty for failing to do so. This is the first time this information has been made available to dentists anywhere in the nation in the 12 years of the HIPAA rule. Dr. Findley and his team are to be congratulated for working through an arduous and unpopular task. It demanded courage.

Darrell

ADA

American Dental Association

http://www.ada.org

John S. Findley, D. D. S. President-Elect

January 8, 2008

Dr. Darrell Pruitt

6737 Brentwood Stair Rd., Ste. 220

Fort Worth, Texas 76112-3337

Dear Doctor Pruitt:

I received your email of December 26th and regret to learn of the loss of your computer. I did inquire as to appropriate procedures upon the occurrence of such an event and am copying below an excerpt from the response of out legal department. “It appears that under these circumstances the dentist may wish to notify affected patients that their information may have been compromised so that they can take necessary steps to protect themselves (i.e. cancel credit cards, notify social security about potentially stolen social security numbers…). (This communication is informational and personal consultation between the dentist and his or her attorney is recommended.) They should also check their state breach notification laws to determine if there is anything else that is required. In this case, the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act (Texas Code Sec. 48 et seq) (the “Act”) covers data breach notification. The Act protects both “Personal Identifying Information,” which is defined as any information that alone, or in conjunction with other information, can be used to identify an individual and an individual’s:

A) name, social security number, date of birth, or government-issued identification number;

B) mother’s maiden name;

C) unique biometric data, including the individual’s fingerprint, voice print, and retina or iris image;

D) unique electronic identification number, address, or routing code; and

E) telecommunication access device.

The Act also protects “Sensitive Personal Information,” which is defined as an individual’s first name or first initial and last name in combination with any one or more of the following items, if the name and the items are not encrypted:

i) social security number;

ii) driver’s license number or government-issued identification number; or

iii) account number or credit or debit card number in combination with any required security code, access code, or password that would permit access to an individual’s financial account.

Sec. 48.102 of the Act creates a duty for businesses to protect and safeguard information through creating and implementing procedures for such purpose. If there is a breach in the security of information, the Act requires a business that maintains ‘Sensitive Personal Information” to notify the owners of such information as soon as possible that a breach has occurred. The Act specifies one of the following modes of notice to be provided:

1) written notice;

2) electronic notice, if the notice is provided in accordance with 15 U.S.C. Section 7001 (which basically requires that a consumer must consent to receiving such notice in electronic form); or

3) notice as provided by Subsection (f) (see below).

(f) If the person or business demonstrates that the cost of providing notice would exceed $250,000, the number of affected persons exceeds 500,000, or the person does not have sufficient contact information, the notice may be given by:

1) electronic mail, if the person has an electronic mail address for the affected persons;

2) conspicuous posting of the notice on the person’s website; or

3) notice published in or broadcast on major statewide media.

Violations

“A person who violates the Act is liable to the state for a civil penalty of at least $2,000 but not more than $50,000 for each violation.” The information pertaining to your question was found in the Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, Chapter 48 of the Business and Commerce Act of Texas.

We hope this information helps.

Sincerely,

John S. Findley, D.D.S.

President-elect

JSF:cac

cc: Dr. S. Jerry Long, trustee, Fifteenth District

  • Dr. James Bramson, executive director
  • Ms. Mary Logan, chief operative officer
  • Ms. Tamra Kempf, chief legal counsel
  • Ms. Mary Kay Linn, executive director, Texas Dental Association

Assessment

Dr. Findley’s letter to me was also deleted from the now closed TDA.org Forum.  The TDA’s actions are a lot like burning books, Dr. Roy Burk.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Dr. David Blumenthal Spins “Professionalism”

My Take on “Meaningful Use”

D. Kellus Pruitt DDS

Recently, lawmakers complained that the federal criteria for “meaningful use” of eHRs – usage required before providers who risk purchasing electronic health record systems can be reimbursed – aren’t strict enough to justify the billions of dollars in incentive payments that the government promised physicians and hospitals. Matthew DoBias, writing for ModernHealthcare, quoted Rep. Wally Herger (Calif.) – the senior Republican on the Ways and Means Committee’s health subcommittee – who said:

“The new HIT regulations are a step in the right direction and should put Medicare on a path to improved quality and efficiency. However; by watering down the final regulations, we have missed an opportunity to advance healthcare delivery and ensure wise use of taxpayer money.”

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100721/NEWS/100729995/1153

Rep. Wally Herger

“Improved quality” you say, Rep. Herger? That proves that politicians like Herger will say whatever it takes to get elected, even if it’s transparently misleading. Herger’s confident claim of improved quality of care from using eHRs is typical of Washington even though quality claims are widely disputed in most medical circles. And if eHRs were as efficient as Herger and his campaign donor’s claim, then the billions of dollars in incentive payments that have already been billed to our grandchildren wouldn’t be wasted to bribe physicians to purchase eHR systems that are too lousy to move off the shelves. If HIT stakeholders’ products offered value for Americans in the land of the free, they would sell for natural reasons of consumer demand and wouldn’t require a government mandate and Herger’s deception. Besides, what does any politician know about “wise use of taxpayer money” even outside of the medical field, Mr. Herger?

[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=doctor+computer&iid=107036″ src=”http://view3.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/107036/medical-professional-using/medical-professional-using.jpg?size=500&imageId=107036″ width=”337″ height=”506″ /]

The Criteria

The criteria for meaningful use have been cut down to 15 issues allegedly because demanding all 25 risked improving care and saving money far too ambitiously. Tony Trenkle, director of the Office of E-Health Standards and Services at CMS, puts his special spin to the “watering down” of requirements. He is quoted in an article by Emily Long in NextGov:

“We set the bar where we felt it was appropriate and also signaled for future stages that we would be setting the bar much higher, We’re going along with ways we can modify to reflect real-life experiences we hit once the program begins.”

Why didn’t Trenkle just say, “We at CMS are making this sucker up as we go”?

http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20100720_9874.php?oref=topnews

Dr. David Blumenthal

Dr. David Blumenthal, the national coordinator for health IT, has given up apologizing for bankrupt ideas like the CMS’s criteria for “meaningful use” of electronic health records – as if they made sense. They don’t, and Blumenthal must know that the clicking-for-cash busywork plan he inherited is a waste of time and money. Otherwise, the AMA wouldn’t be complaining.

(See “AMA Weighs in on ‘Meaningful Use’ Requirements For E-Records” – Wall Street Journal Blog)

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/07/21/ama-weighs-in-on-meaningful-use-requirements-for-e-records/  

Surely Dr. Blumenthal recognizes that naive lawmakers like Rep. Wally Herger are foolishly demanding unwanted and dangerous micromanagement of healthcare, not in the interest of patients’ welfare, but for political power. (Do Americans really want Wally Herger from California regulating healthcare?) Rather than attempting to sell systems to doctors based on disingenuous claims of unproven value, Blumenthal chose to punt. All he could offer was a lame appeal to pride: “Much more important than incentives will be a professional sense of obligation,” (Emily Long, NextGov, ibid).

The Oath

Doesn’t the Hippocratic Oath, as well as business survival trump the dangerous nonsense Dr. Blumenthal calls “professional obligations”? As if to emphasize that point, just hours ago, some relevant news was posted concerning the danger of eHRs: “A Massachusetts hospital is under scrutiny after hundreds of thousands of patient and employee records went missing earlier this year. The missing files underscore the problems health care providers face when balancing patient privacy and the need to store massive amounts of data, especially as new federal rules for electronic health records come into play.” (See “Massachusetts Hospital Reports 800,000 Personal Records Missing” by Brian T. Horowitz for eWeek, 7/21/10).

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Health-Care-IT/Massachusetts-Hospital-Reports-800000-Personal-Records-Missing-638660/ 

Assessment

How does risking such harm to patients rise to the level of a “professional obligation”? I think Dr. Blumenthal might be confusing professionalism with patriotism. They are both traditional, flexible buzzwords that start with the letter “P” and are often used for just about any bureaucratic chore – even so far as to prove diametrically opposing views.

Conclusion

Please comment on this post and feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: Our publisher, Dr. David E. Marcinko, is a sought after speaker in the areas of health economics, financial planning, medical practice management and related entrepreneurial e-insights for many intersecting sectors in the healthcare industrial complex. Contact the ME-P for availability and scheduling. 

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Physician Self-Referral “under arrangement” Scrutiny

And IDTF Prohibitions

[By Staff Reporters]

According to Robert James Cimasi MHA, ASA, AVA, CBA, CMP™ certain physician/hospital relationships referred to as “under arrangements” and “per click” leasing ventures have come under increasing regulatory scrutiny.

Definition

An under arrangement transaction occurs when the hospital contracts with a third party (typically a joint venture owned, at least in part, by physicians who may refer) to provide a hospital service, and the hospital then bills and is reimbursed by Medicare for those services and pays the supplier, or joint venture.  As the “entity” to which the physicians refer patients is the hospital, not the joint venture (i.e., the “entity” is deemed to be the entity that submits the reimbursement claim to Medicare) this type of “arrangement” is permitted under Stark.

Stark Revisions

However, buried in the July 2, 2007, 2008 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule, CMS has proposed revisions to the Stark regulations that broaden the definition of “entity” to include the person or entity that performs the designated health services and would prohibit space and equipment lease arrangements where per-click payments are made to a physician lessor who refers patients to the lessee.  Although the proposed self-referral prohibitions (as well as arrangements where the physician is the lessee and rents space from a hospital) did not appear in the Final Rule, similar provisions are expected in 2008.

CMS has also passed restrictions related to independent diagnostic testing facility [IDTF] arrangements.

gag

Assessment

For example, since January 1, 2008, IDTFs are no longer allowed to share practice locations, operations, and diagnostic testing equipment with other Medicare-enrolled providers, including leasing and subleasing agreements.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details      

Product DetailsProduct Details

Update on Senior Donut Hole Rebate Checks

More Seniors to Receive One-Time Donut Hole Rebate Checks

By Staff Reports

Medicare Beneficiaries Whose High Prescription Drug Costs Have Put Them in the Medicare Part D Donut Hole to Receive $250 Rebate Checks as a Result of the Affordable Care Act

WASHINGTON – The next round of more than 300,000 eligible seniors who have entered the Medicare Part D “donut hole” this year have been mailed their tax-free, one time rebate check for $250, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced recently. These one-time rebate checks are the first step in closing the prescription drug coverage gap under the Affordable Care Act. The first round of checks were distributed in the middle of June. As qualifying Medicare recipients “fall into the donut hole,” they will be sent a rebate check by Medicare.

“Seniors and other Medicare recipients in the Medicare donut hole are struggling to afford the medications they need and their basic living expenses. Seventy percent of our first round of these $250 rebate checks were cashed within a week of eligible Medicare recipients receiving them; so, we know that folks really need some help,” said Secretary Sebelius. “The Affordable Care Act starts to close the donut hole this year, giving much-needed relief to millions of seniors. In 2011, the Affordable Care Act takes an additional step for Medicare beneficiaries in the donut hole by providing them with a 50 percent discount on their brand name medications. Every year from 2012 until 2020, the Affordable Care Act will take progressive steps to close the donut hole.” 

“Seniors also need to know that they will just receive their check at their usual address – they don’t have to take any extra steps,” said Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Deputy Administrator and Director for the Center for Medicare, Jonathan Blum. “And they should never give out their personal information. If someone asks for your personal Medicare information over the phone who isn’t a trusted resource like Medicare, please don’t provide it. Seniors or family members should contact us at 1-800-MEDICARE to report any of these types of calls or go to www.stopmedicarefraud.gov to learn more about efforts to fight fraud and scams against seniors.”

On Thursday, July 8th, at 2:00 p.m., HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius joined local officials in Manchester, N.H., for a forum with senior citizens to discuss the rebate checks and other benefits of the Affordable Care Act as well as efforts to fight Medicare fraud.

The $250 checks are being mailed to those Medicare beneficiaries who entered the Medicare Part D donut hole, also known as the coverage gap, in the second quarter of 2010 and are not eligible for Medicare Extra Help (also known as the low-income subsidy or LIS) or enrolled in a qualified retiree prescription drug plan. The donut hole is the period in the prescription drug benefit in which the beneficiary pays 100 percent of the cost of their drugs until they reach the catastrophic coverage phase.

About Medicare Extra Help

Medicare Extra Help provides assistance to seniors so they don’t face higher costs or a coverage gap in their prescription drug coverage. Qualifying Medicare beneficiaries who entered the donut hole in the first quarter of 2010 who were not eligible for Medicare Extra Help received a check in the first round of rebates mailed June 10th. Going forward, a check for qualifying beneficiaries newly reaching the donut hole in 2010 will be mailed monthly.

Assessment

More information about the “donut hole” rebate checks, please contact www.HealthCare.gov or 1-800-MEDICARE. For further questions about Extra Help (or the LIS) benefit under Part D, please contact the Social Security Administration at www.ssa.gov.

Conclusion

Doctors and FAs – how will this rebate assist your patients and clients? Feel free to comment and review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details     

The PPACA and Physician’s Ability to Bill

ADVERTISEMENT

Failure of Physician Referral Sources to Enroll in Medicare’s Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System [PECOS] May Affect their Ability to Bill

Join Our Mailing List

 

 

By Garfunkel Wild, PC

In response to, among other things, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that was signed into law earlier this year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued an interim final rule on May 5, 2010 that requires all:

  • Physicians [1] and non-physician practitioners [2] who order or refer Medicare beneficiaries for, or furnish Medicare beneficiaries with, Part B covered items and services; and
  • Physicians who certify home health services be enrolled in PECOS as of July 6, 2010 in order for the billing provider to receive payment for the ordered, referred, or furnished items or services under Medicare Part B (and, in the case of home health services, Part A).  Some of the types of claims that will be affected by this new rule include:
  • Claims from laboratories for ordered tests;
  • Claims from imaging centers for ordered imaging procedures;
  • Claims from suppliers of DMEPOS for ordered DMEPOS;
  • Certification for Part A and Part B covered home health services; and
  • Claims from specialists or specialty groups for referred services (including, but not limited to, physical therapy services).

In addition to prohibiting payment for these services, the interim final rule also requires that the teaching physician — NOT the intern or resident — be identified on the claim for Part B services as the referring or ordering physician whenever an intern or resident orders or refers.  This is also effective as of July 6, 2010.

Physician Health

Assessment Therefore, all providers who bill for ordered, referred, or furnished items or services that are payable under Medicare Part B (and home health care providers who bill for Part A and/or Part B covered services) should check the “Ordering and Referring Report” maintained by CMS to confirm whether the ordering or referring provider has an enrollment record in PECOS before submitting a claim as of July 6, 2010.

This Report can be viewed at: www.cms.gov/MedicareProviderSupEnroll/06_MedicareOrderingandReferring.asp.

If the ordering or referring provider is not listed on the Report, there is confusion as to whether billing providers are entitled to submit claims for items and services ordered or referred by such providers.  While CMS has acknowledged that some providers have encountered problems getting their information into PECOS and announced that, for the time being, it will not implement changes that would automatically reject claims based on orders, certifications, and referrals made by providers that have not yet had their applications approved by July 6, 2010, CMS has expressly declined to delay implementation of the interim final rule as of the date of this Alert.

References [1] This includes a doctor of medicine or osteopathy, doctor of dental medicine, doctor of dental surgery, doctor of podiatric medicine, doctor of optometry, and doctor of chiropractic medicine.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

 

Product DetailsProduct Details

Product Details

 

How Physicians Select Risk Management Advisors

More Difficult than Ever Before

By Brian J. Knabe MD, Certified Medical Planner

www.SavantCapital.com

Historically, the term “risk management” has brought to mind one subject for the practicing physician – medical malpractice.  Unfortunately, physicians today face a multitude of other risks which may be more insidious and daunting than malpractice.  It is important to recognize these risks, and to have the appropriate procedures and policies in place to mitigate the risks.  These risks come from the federal government, state government, insurance companies, patients, employees, and even prospective employees.  Some risks, many unique to small businesses and medical practices, include the following:

  • Medicare recoupment risk – challenges to coding and subsequent billing by the physician.
  • Medicare fraud.  Numerous laws can be used by the federal government to go after the physician, including the Medicare and Medicaid Anti-Fraud and Abuse Statute, the RICO statute, and the Federal False Claims Act.  The recently enacted Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act aims to save money by increasing funding for anti-fraud efforts.
  • Insurance fraud.  An inquiry from Medicare to look for fraud in a physician’s practice is often followed by similar efforts by insurance companies.
  • The HIPPA Act of 1996 creates new definitions and penalties to use against the physician.
  • Self referral risks.  Federal regulations in this area include the Medicare Anti-Fraud and Abuse Statute, the Medicare Safe Harbor Regulations, and the Stark Amendment.
  • Federal agency risks.  These include regulations from the Occupational Health and Safety Agency (OSHA), Health and Human Services (HHS), the Drug Enforcement agency (DEA), and even the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • Anti-trust risks.  The Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) formulate regulations in this arena.
  • Managed care contractual risks.  Most managed care contracts require the individual physician rather than the professional corporation to sign the contract, thus placing the physician’s personal assets at risk.
  • Medical malpractice risks.  Although the vast majority of claims are paid by the insurance carrier, there can be other adverse consequences for the physician.  These include the risk of increased premiums, non-renewal of policies, and difficulty in getting replacement insurance.
  • Loss of income due to death or disability.  Most physicians recognize the importance of life insurance, but the medical professional is actually much more likely to lose income due to disability at some point in his or her career.

http://www.amazon.com/Insurance-Management-Strategies-Physicians-Advisors/dp/0763733423/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1375149801&sr=8-6&keywords=marcinko+david

The practicing physician should seek the advice of professionals with expertise in these areas.  Every practice should have an experienced attorney on retainer.  It is very important to seek advice from fiduciaries – experts who have no conflicts of interest and who can therefore act in the best interest of the client.  A Certified Medical Planner is such a fiduciary with training and expertise in these areas.

http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

It can be particularly challenging to find an insurance advisor with no conflicts of interest, as this industry is built upon product sales and commissions.  One such insurance advisor is Scott Witt, a fee-only insurance advisor with Witt Actuarial Services (www.wittactuarialservices.com).

Others can be found with an internet search for “fee only insurance advisor”.

Assessment

Join Our Mailing List 

Conclusion

Your comments on this ME-P are appreciated. How do you select an advisor? Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com 

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product Details  Product Details

Product DetailsProduct Details

Understanding the Mental Healthcare Regulatory Environment

Join Our Mailing List

Appreciating the Rules

[By Carol Miller; RN, MBA]

Carol S. MillerLocal counties and municipalities are the primary providers of state mental healthcare for patients who lack private insurance coverage for such care.

Both children and adults may be eligible to receive assistance.

These counties provide a wide range of psychiatric and counseling services to the residents in their community as well as other types of assistance such as:

  • treatment services related to substance abuse;
  • housing;
  • employment services;
  • information and education service;
  • referrals;
  • consultative services to schools, courts and other agencies;
  • after-care services; and other related activities.

mental

Rules and Regulations

Accordingly, regulations from federal, state, and county governments have an impact on the day-to-day operations, procedures and processes of a county mental health center. Traditionally, there are three main types of regulations.

Federal Regulations — The United States healthcare system is guided by programs such as those established under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (in the case of county mental health programs, Medicaid is especially important), Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and others.

State Regulations — These include general legislative guidelines, state management of benefits and reimbursement of the Medicaid program, and state allocations of budgets, which impact the centers’ operations.

County Regulations — Each county defines its own County Mental Health Program and decides which services will be provided or excluded.

Assessment

County facilities generally include outpatient clinics, county mental health programs, short-term psychiatric facilities, day-care centers, de-toxification centers, residential rehabilitation centers for substance abuse, long-term care psychiatric facilities, and Veterans Affairs (VA) psychiatric centers. The county centers may be co-located with other county services such as social services, occupational rehabilitation services, information technology services, human resources, maintenance services, and others or may be independently located.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

%d bloggers like this: