CONCIERGE MEDICINE: In Podiatry

Posted on March 16, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Redefining Access, Value and the Patient Experience

Concierge medicine has gained steady traction across many medical specialties, but its relevance to podiatry is especially compelling. Podiatrists sit at the intersection of primary care, chronic disease management, biomechanics, and minor surgical intervention. They often treat conditions that profoundly affect mobility, independence, and quality of life. Yet podiatry practices face the same pressures that challenge the broader healthcare system: shrinking reimbursements, rising administrative burdens, and patient panels that grow faster than the time available to serve them. Concierge medicine offers podiatrists a model that can restore time, autonomy, and depth to the patient relationship while elevating the standard of care.

At its core, concierge medicine replaces the high‑volume, insurance‑driven model with a membership‑based structure that allows clinicians to limit their patient load and provide more personalized, accessible care. For podiatrists, this shift can be transformative. Foot and ankle issues often require ongoing monitoring, detailed biomechanical assessments, and frequent follow‑ups. In a traditional practice, these needs can be difficult to meet when appointment slots are compressed into ten‑ or fifteen‑minute increments. Concierge podiatry, by contrast, allows for extended visits, same‑day access, and direct communication between patient and provider. This creates space for deeper evaluation, more thoughtful treatment planning, and a more collaborative approach to long‑term foot health.

One of the strongest arguments for concierge podiatry is the nature of the conditions podiatrists treat. Many patients struggle with chronic issues such as diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, recurrent wounds, or structural deformities that require ongoing attention. These conditions do not resolve with a single visit; they evolve, fluctuate, and often require proactive management. In a concierge model, podiatrists can monitor these patients more closely, intervene earlier, and spend the time necessary to educate them about prevention and self‑care. This can reduce complications, improve outcomes, and foster a sense of partnership that is difficult to achieve in a high‑volume setting.

Concierge podiatry also aligns well with the growing emphasis on preventive care. Many foot and ankle problems—such as tendon injuries, stress fractures, or progressive deformities—develop gradually and can be mitigated with early intervention. A concierge structure allows podiatrists to conduct more comprehensive biomechanical evaluations, gait analyses, and footwear consultations. It also gives them the freedom to integrate services that are often squeezed out of traditional practice models, such as personalized orthotic management, fall‑risk assessments, or long‑term monitoring for athletes. Patients benefit from a more holistic approach that prioritizes prevention rather than simply reacting to acute problems.

***

Another advantage of concierge podiatry is accessibility. Foot pain can be debilitating, and delays in care often worsen the underlying condition. Concierge patients typically enjoy same‑day or next‑day appointments, direct messaging with their podiatrist, and the ability to address concerns quickly before they escalate. For individuals with diabetes, mobility limitations, or demanding schedules, this level of access can be invaluable. It also reduces reliance on urgent care centers or emergency departments, where foot issues may not receive specialized attention.

From the podiatrist’s perspective, concierge medicine offers a path to greater professional satisfaction. Many podiatrists enter the field because they enjoy building long‑term relationships and helping patients maintain mobility and independence. Yet the realities of insurance‑based practice—documentation requirements, declining reimbursements, and the pressure to see more patients in less time—can erode that sense of purpose. A concierge model restores control over scheduling, reduces administrative strain, and allows podiatrists to practice in a way that reflects their values. This can help prevent burnout and create a more sustainable career.

Of course, concierge podiatry is not without challenges. The most common criticism of concierge medicine in general is that it may limit access for patients who cannot afford membership fees. When a podiatrist transitions to a concierge model and reduces their patient panel, some individuals may need to seek care elsewhere. In communities with limited access to foot and ankle specialists, this can create gaps in care. Podiatrists considering this model must weigh the benefits of improved care for a smaller group of patients against the potential impact on the broader community.

Another challenge is determining which services are included in the membership fee and which remain billable through insurance. Podiatry encompasses a wide range of procedures—from routine nail care to surgical interventions—and patients may misunderstand what their membership covers. Clear communication is essential to avoid confusion and maintain trust. Some concierge podiatrists choose a hybrid model, where the membership fee covers enhanced access and preventive services, while procedures and surgeries are billed separately. Others opt for a fully cash‑based practice. Each approach has advantages, but all require transparency.

***

***

Despite these complexities, the potential for concierge medicine to elevate podiatric care is significant. As patients increasingly seek personalized, relationship‑driven healthcare, podiatrists are well positioned to offer a concierge experience that feels both meaningful and practical. Foot and ankle health is foundational to overall well‑being, and many patients are willing to invest in a model that prioritizes mobility, comfort, and long‑term function.

Looking ahead, concierge podiatry may continue to evolve in creative ways. Some practices may integrate wellness services such as physical therapy, nutrition counseling, or sports performance programs. Others may develop specialized concierge offerings for athletes, older adults, or individuals with diabetes. Technology may also play a role, enabling remote monitoring of gait, pressure distribution, or wound healing. The flexibility of the concierge model allows podiatrists to tailor their services to the unique needs of their patient population.

Ultimately, concierge medicine offers podiatrists an opportunity to reimagine how they deliver care. It provides a framework that values time, expertise, and human connection—elements that are often lost in traditional practice. While it may not be the right fit for every clinician or every community, it represents a powerful alternative for podiatrists who want to deepen their relationships with patients, enhance the quality of their care, and build a practice that reflects the true spirit of their profession.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Career Development, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Marcinko Associates, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: bills, cash medicine, cash practice, concierge medicine, concierge podiatry, david marcinko, DPM, FEES, membership fees | Leave a comment »

The Medical Bundled Payment System

Posted on March 11, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.HealthDictionarySeries.org

***

***

A Transformative Approach to Healthcare Financing

The medical bundled payment system has emerged as one of the most significant shifts in modern healthcare financing, aiming to balance cost control with improved patient outcomes. Unlike the traditional fee‑for‑service model—where providers are paid for each individual test, visit, or procedure—bundled payments offer a single, predetermined payment for all services related to a specific episode of care. This episode might include a surgery, a chronic condition flare‑up, or a defined period of treatment. By restructuring financial incentives, bundled payments encourage coordination, efficiency, and quality in ways that fee‑for‑service simply does not.

At its core, the bundled payment system is designed to align the interests of patients, providers, and payers. Under fee‑for‑service, providers are rewarded for volume: more procedures generate more revenue. This can unintentionally promote unnecessary services and fragmented care. Bundled payments flip that logic. Providers receive a fixed amount for the entire episode, regardless of how many services are delivered. This encourages them to focus on what truly matters—delivering the right care at the right time, avoiding complications, and preventing avoidable re-admissions.

***

One of the most powerful effects of bundled payments is the incentive for care coordination. When multiple providers—surgeons, hospitals, rehabilitation centers, primary care physicians—share a single payment, they must work together to manage the patient’s journey. This collaboration can reduce duplication of services, streamline communication, and create a more seamless experience for patients. For example, in a joint replacement bundle, the orthopedic surgeon and hospital have a shared interest in ensuring that the patient receives appropriate pre‑operative education, avoids infections, and transitions smoothly to rehabilitation. If complications arise, the cost of addressing them comes out of the same fixed payment, motivating providers to prevent problems before they occur.

Bundled payments also encourage providers to adopt evidence‑based practices. Because the financial risk shifts partially to the provider, there is a strong incentive to use interventions that are proven to work and avoid those that add cost without improving outcomes. This can accelerate the adoption of clinical guidelines, standardized care pathways, and quality improvement initiatives. Over time, these changes can lead to more predictable outcomes and reduced variability in care—two hallmarks of a high‑performing healthcare system.

***

However, the bundled payment system is not without challenges. One concern is the potential for providers to avoid high‑risk patients who might require more resources than the bundled payment covers. To address this, many programs incorporate risk adjustment, ensuring that payments reflect the complexity of the patient population. Another challenge is the administrative burden of implementing bundled payments. Providers must invest in data analytics, care coordination infrastructure, and new management processes to track costs and outcomes across an entire episode of care. Smaller practices may struggle with these demands, potentially widening gaps between large, well‑resourced systems and smaller providers.

Despite these challenges, bundled payments represent a meaningful step toward value‑based care. They encourage a shift from reactive, fragmented treatment to proactive, coordinated management. Patients benefit from smoother care transitions, fewer complications, and a clearer understanding of their treatment plan. Payers benefit from more predictable costs and reduced waste. Providers benefit from the opportunity to innovate and redesign care delivery in ways that improve both quality and efficiency.

In many ways, the bundled payment system reflects a broader transformation in healthcare: a move away from paying for services and toward paying for outcomes. While not a perfect solution, it offers a compelling framework for aligning incentives and improving the overall value of care. As healthcare systems continue to evolve, bundled payments are likely to remain a central strategy in the pursuit of high‑quality, cost‑effective care.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Accounting, Ask a Doctor, finance, Funding Basics, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: The Medical Bundled Payment System | Leave a comment »

ATTENTION ECONOMY: In the Digital Age

Posted on March 10, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Filed under: Career Development, economics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, iMBA, Inc., Marcinko Associates | Tagged: attention economy, david marcinko, digital economy, economics, economy | Comments Off on ATTENTION ECONOMY: In the Digital Age

DEFINED: Twenty Medical Specialties

Posted on March 3, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.HealthDictionarySeries.org

***

***

A Comprehensive Overview

Medicine is an extraordinarily diverse field, shaped by centuries of scientific discovery and the evolving needs of human health. As knowledge has expanded, so too has the need for physicians to specialize in particular systems, diseases, or patient populations. Today’s medical landscape includes a wide range of specialties, each with its own philosophy, diagnostic approach, and therapeutic focus. Understanding these specialties not only clarifies how modern healthcare functions but also highlights the complexity of caring for the human body. The following essay explores twenty major medical specialties, defining their core purposes and illustrating how each contributes to the broader practice of medicine.

1. Internal Medicine

Internal medicine is the foundation of adult medical care. Internists specialize in diagnosing, treating, and preventing diseases that affect adults, particularly complex or chronic conditions. Their work spans multiple organ systems, requiring a broad understanding of physiology and pathology. Internists often serve as primary care physicians, coordinating care among subspecialists and managing long‑term health issues such as hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease.

2. Family Medicine

Family medicine emphasizes comprehensive, continuous care for individuals and families across all ages, genders, and health conditions. Unlike internal medicine, which focuses on adults, family physicians treat children, adolescents, adults, and older adults. Their holistic approach integrates preventive care, acute illness management, and chronic disease monitoring. Family medicine values long‑term relationships and community‑based practice.

3. Pediatrics

Pediatrics is dedicated to the health of infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatricians address developmental milestones, childhood illnesses, congenital disorders, and preventive care such as vaccinations. They must understand not only the physiology of growing bodies but also the emotional and social needs of young patients. Pediatricians often collaborate closely with families to support healthy development.

4. Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN)

OB/GYN combines two related fields: obstetrics, which focuses on pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum care, and gynecology, which addresses the health of the female reproductive system. Specialists in this field manage prenatal care, deliver babies, perform reproductive surgeries, and treat conditions such as endometriosis, infertility, and menstrual disorders. OB/GYN physicians balance surgical skill with long‑term patient care.

5. Surgery

Surgery is one of the oldest and most technically demanding medical specialties. Surgeons diagnose and treat diseases, injuries, and deformities through operative procedures. General surgeons handle a wide range of abdominal, breast, and soft‑tissue conditions, while many pursue subspecialties such as vascular, colorectal, or trauma surgery. Surgical practice requires precision, decisiveness, and the ability to manage perioperative care.

6. Orthopedic Surgery

Orthopedic surgery focuses on the musculoskeletal system, including bones, joints, ligaments, tendons, and muscles. Orthopedic surgeons treat fractures, sports injuries, degenerative diseases like arthritis, and congenital deformities. Their work often involves reconstructive procedures, joint replacements, and minimally invasive techniques. This specialty blends mechanical understanding with surgical expertise.

7. Cardiology

Cardiology is the study and treatment of diseases of the heart and blood vessels. Cardiologists manage conditions such as coronary artery disease, arrhythmias, heart failure, and hypertension. They use diagnostic tools like electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, and stress tests to evaluate cardiovascular function. Some cardiologists specialize further in interventional procedures, electrophysiology, or advanced heart failure management.

8. Neurology

Neurology focuses on disorders of the nervous system, including the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves. Neurologists diagnose and treat conditions such as epilepsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis, migraines, and neurodegenerative diseases. Their work requires careful clinical examination and interpretation of imaging and electrophysiological tests. Neurology often intersects with psychiatry, rehabilitation, and neurosurgery.

9. Psychiatry

Psychiatry is the medical specialty devoted to mental, emotional, and behavioral health. Psychiatrists evaluate and treat conditions such as depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and substance‑related disorders. They use a combination of psychotherapy, behavioral interventions, and medication management. Psychiatry uniquely bridges biological and psychological perspectives on human health.

10. Dermatology

Dermatology addresses diseases of the skin, hair, and nails. Dermatologists diagnose and treat conditions such as eczema, psoriasis, acne, skin infections, and skin cancers. They perform procedures including biopsies, excisions, and cosmetic treatments. Because the skin reflects both internal and external influences, dermatologists often collaborate with other specialists to identify systemic causes of dermatologic symptoms.

***

11. Ophthalmology

Ophthalmology is the medical and surgical care of the eyes and visual system. Ophthalmologists treat conditions such as cataracts, glaucoma, macular degeneration, and retinal disorders. They perform delicate microsurgeries and use advanced imaging to assess ocular health. Vision is central to daily life, making ophthalmology essential for preserving quality of life.

12. Otolaryngology (ENT)

Otolaryngology—often called ENT—focuses on disorders of the ear, nose, throat, head, and neck. ENT specialists treat hearing loss, sinus disease, voice disorders, sleep apnea, and head‑and‑neck cancers. Their work includes both medical management and surgical procedures, ranging from tonsillectomies to complex reconstructive surgeries.

13. Emergency Medicine

Emergency medicine physicians provide immediate care for acute illnesses and injuries. They work in fast‑paced environments where rapid assessment and stabilization are critical. Emergency physicians treat trauma, heart attacks, strokes, infections, and a wide range of urgent conditions. Their broad training allows them to manage patients of all ages and coordinate care with specialists.

14. Anesthesiology

Anesthesiology centers on pain management and the safe administration of anesthesia during surgical and medical procedures. Anesthesiologists monitor vital functions, manage airway and breathing, and ensure patient comfort. They also provide critical care, acute pain services, and chronic pain management. Their role is essential for modern surgery and intensive care.

15. Radiology

Radiology involves the use of imaging technologies to diagnose and sometimes treat disease. Radiologists interpret X‑rays, CT scans, MRIs, ultrasounds, and nuclear medicine studies. Interventional radiologists perform minimally invasive procedures guided by imaging, such as angioplasty or tumor ablation. Radiology is central to accurate diagnosis across nearly all medical specialties.

16. Pathology

Pathology is the study of disease at the microscopic and molecular levels. Pathologists analyze tissue samples, blood, and bodily fluids to identify abnormalities and provide definitive diagnoses. Their work includes surgical pathology, cytology, and laboratory medicine. Although they often work behind the scenes, pathologists are essential for confirming diagnoses and guiding treatment decisions.

17. Oncology

Oncology focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Oncologists manage chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and palliative care. They work closely with surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists to develop comprehensive treatment plans. Oncology requires not only scientific expertise but also compassionate communication, as patients often face life‑altering diagnoses.

18. Endocrinology

Endocrinology addresses disorders of the endocrine system, which regulates hormones. Endocrinologists treat conditions such as diabetes, thyroid disease, adrenal disorders, and metabolic bone disease. Because hormones influence nearly every bodily function, endocrinologists must understand complex physiological interactions and long‑term disease management.

19. Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology focuses on the digestive system, including the esophagus, stomach, intestines, liver, pancreas, and gallbladder. Gastroenterologists diagnose and treat conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, liver disease, ulcers, and gastrointestinal cancers. They perform endoscopic procedures to visualize and treat internal structures. Digestive health plays a crucial role in overall well‑being, making this specialty vital.

20. Nephrology

Nephrology is the study and treatment of kidney diseases. Nephrologists manage chronic kidney disease, electrolyte imbalances, hypertension related to kidney dysfunction, and dialysis care. They play a central role in preventing kidney failure and supporting patients who require renal replacement therapy. Because the kidneys influence many bodily systems, nephrology often overlaps with cardiology, endocrinology, and critical care.

Conclusion

The diversity of medical specialties reflects the complexity of human health. Each specialty contributes a unique perspective, set of skills, and body of knowledge, yet all share the common goal of improving patient well‑being. From the precision of surgery to the holistic approach of family medicine, from the microscopic focus of pathology to the emotional insight of psychiatry, these twenty specialties illustrate the breadth of modern medicine. Understanding them not only clarifies how healthcare is organized but also highlights the collaborative nature of caring for patients in an increasingly specialized world.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Career Development, Glossary Terms, Health Law & Policy, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: anesthesiology, cardiology, david marcinko, dermatology, ENT, GI, GYN, health, healthcare, nephrology, neurology, OB, Oncology, opthalmology, pathology, pediatrics, psychiatry, pulmonology, radiology, S&P 500, surgery, wellness | Leave a comment »

HEALTHCARE GOVERNANCE: Breakup of the Medical Act

Posted on March 1, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd CMP

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

An Examination of Its Causes and Consequences

The breakup of the Medical Act represents one of the most significant turning points in the evolution of modern healthcare governance. For decades, the Act served as a foundational framework that regulated medical practice, established professional standards, and defined the relationship between the state, medical institutions, and practitioners. Its dissolution did not occur suddenly; rather, it emerged from a complex interplay of political pressures, professional disputes, and shifting societal expectations. Understanding the breakup requires examining both the structural weaknesses within the Act itself and the broader forces that made its continuation untenable.

At its core, the Medical Act was designed to centralize authority over medical licensing and professional conduct. When it was first introduced, this centralization was seen as a necessary step toward ensuring uniform standards and protecting the public from unqualified practitioners. Over time, however, the rigidity of the Act became a source of tension. Medical knowledge expanded rapidly, new specialties emerged, and healthcare delivery became increasingly complex. Yet the Act remained anchored in assumptions that no longer reflected the realities of modern medicine. Many practitioners argued that the Act constrained innovation, limited professional autonomy, and failed to adapt to new models of care.

One of the major catalysts for the breakup was the growing dissatisfaction among medical professionals who felt that the Act imposed excessive bureaucratic oversight. Licensing procedures, disciplinary mechanisms, and continuing education requirements were often criticized as outdated or overly punitive. Younger practitioners, in particular, viewed the Act as an obstacle to entering the profession, citing long delays, inconsistent evaluation standards, and a lack of transparency. These frustrations fueled calls for reform, but attempts to revise the Act repeatedly stalled due to political disagreements and resistance from established institutions that benefited from the status quo.

Another factor contributing to the breakup was the increasing involvement of non‑physician healthcare providers in delivering essential services. Nurses, physician assistants, pharmacists, and other allied health professionals sought expanded scopes of practice to meet rising patient demand. However, the Medical Act was built around a physician‑centric model that did not easily accommodate these shifts. As collaborative care models became more common, the Act’s limitations became more apparent. Conflicts emerged over authority, responsibility, and professional boundaries, creating friction within the healthcare system. The inability of the Act to adapt to these new dynamics weakened its legitimacy and fueled arguments for its dissolution.

Public expectations also played a significant role. Patients became more informed, more vocal, and more demanding of accountability. They expected transparency in medical decision‑making, greater access to care, and more equitable treatment across communities. Yet the Medical Act was often criticized for protecting professional interests rather than prioritizing patient welfare. High‑profile cases involving malpractice, discrimination, or regulatory failures eroded public trust. Advocacy groups argued that the Act lacked sufficient mechanisms for patient representation and that its disciplinary processes were opaque and slow. As public pressure mounted, political leaders found it increasingly difficult to defend the existing framework.

***

The breakup of the Medical Act was ultimately driven by a convergence of these pressures. When reform efforts repeatedly failed, stakeholders began to explore alternative regulatory models. Some advocated for decentralization, arguing that regional or specialty‑specific bodies could respond more effectively to local needs. Others pushed for a more integrated system that would regulate all healthcare professionals under a unified framework, promoting collaboration and reducing duplication. The eventual dissolution of the Act opened the door to these new possibilities, though not without controversy.

The consequences of the breakup have been far‑reaching. On one hand, it created opportunities for modernization. New regulatory structures have been more flexible, more responsive to emerging trends, and more inclusive of diverse healthcare professions. Licensing processes have been streamlined, interdisciplinary collaboration has improved, and patient advocacy has gained a stronger voice in governance. Many practitioners feel that the new system better reflects the realities of contemporary healthcare and supports innovation rather than hindering it.

On the other hand, the transition has not been without challenges. The breakup initially created uncertainty, as practitioners and institutions navigated shifting rules and responsibilities. Some critics argue that decentralization has led to inconsistencies in standards, making it harder to ensure uniform quality of care. Others worry that the new system may lack the strong oversight mechanisms that once protected the public. Balancing flexibility with accountability remains an ongoing struggle, and debates continue over how best to regulate a rapidly evolving healthcare landscape.

In many ways, the breakup of the Medical Act symbolizes a broader transformation in society’s understanding of healthcare. It reflects a shift away from rigid, hierarchical models toward more dynamic, collaborative, and patient‑centered approaches. While the dissolution of such a longstanding framework inevitably brought disruption, it also created space for innovation and reform. The legacy of the Medical Act lives on in the structures that replaced it, shaped by the lessons learned from its strengths and its shortcomings.

Ultimately, the breakup was not merely a legal or administrative event; it was a reflection of changing values, expectations, and realities. As healthcare continues to evolve, the story of the Medical Act serves as a reminder that regulatory systems must remain adaptable, transparent, and responsive to the needs of both practitioners and the public.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Ethics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: AI, CMP, david marcinko, health, healthcare, medicine, Technology, The Breakup of the Medical Act | Leave a comment »

Blinded Medical Payments

Posted on February 27, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

An Examination of Their Purpose and Impact

Blinded medical payments have emerged as a compelling approach to addressing some of the most persistent challenges in modern healthcare systems. At their core, these payment structures are designed to separate the financial aspects of care from the clinical decision‑making process. By obscuring or “blinding” the cost of specific services from either the patient, the provider, or both, the model aims to reduce conflicts of interest, encourage unbiased medical judgment, and create a more equitable healthcare experience. Although the concept may seem counterintuitive in a system where transparency is often championed, blinded payments offer a nuanced strategy for improving trust, fairness, and outcomes.

One of the primary motivations behind blinded medical payments is the desire to minimize the influence of financial incentives on clinical decisions. In many traditional payment models, providers are acutely aware of the reimbursement rates associated with different procedures. This awareness can unintentionally shape treatment recommendations, even when clinicians strive to act solely in the patient’s best interest. Blinded payment systems attempt to remove this pressure by ensuring that providers do not know the exact compensation tied to each service. Without this knowledge, the theory goes, decisions are more likely to be guided by clinical need rather than financial reward. This can be particularly valuable in specialties where high‑cost procedures are common and where the potential for overuse is well documented.

Patients, too, can benefit from a degree of blinding. When individuals are confronted with detailed cost information at the point of care, they may feel compelled to make decisions based on price rather than medical necessity. This dynamic can lead to underuse of essential services, delayed treatment, or heightened anxiety during an already stressful moment. By shielding patients from granular cost details until after care is delivered, blinded payment systems aim to preserve the integrity of the clinical encounter. The patient can focus on understanding their condition and the recommended treatment, rather than navigating a complex and often confusing financial landscape.

Another important dimension of blinded medical payments is their potential to reduce disparities. In many healthcare systems, providers may unconsciously adjust their recommendations based on assumptions about a patient’s ability to pay. Even well‑intentioned clinicians can fall into patterns of offering different options to different socioeconomic groups. Blinding payment information helps counteract this tendency by ensuring that all patients are presented with the same range of medically appropriate choices. This can contribute to more consistent care across populations and help narrow gaps in outcomes that have persisted for decades.

***

However, blinded medical payments are not without challenges. Critics argue that withholding cost information from patients undermines their autonomy. In an era where consumer‑driven healthcare is increasingly emphasized, some believe that individuals should have full access to pricing details so they can make informed decisions about their care. Others worry that blinding providers to reimbursement rates may reduce accountability or make it more difficult to evaluate the cost‑effectiveness of different treatments. These concerns highlight the delicate balance between transparency and impartiality, and they underscore the need for thoughtful implementation.

Operationally, blinded payment systems require sophisticated administrative structures. Healthcare organizations must develop mechanisms to process claims, allocate funds, and track utilization without revealing sensitive financial details to clinicians or patients. This can be resource‑intensive, especially for smaller practices or systems with limited technological infrastructure. Additionally, the success of blinded payments depends on trust—trust that the system is fair, that reimbursement is adequate, and that no party is being disadvantaged by the lack of visibility.

Despite these complexities, blinded medical payments represent a meaningful attempt to address the misaligned incentives that often distort healthcare delivery. They challenge the assumption that more information is always better and instead propose that strategic withholding of information can sometimes lead to more ethical and equitable outcomes. As healthcare systems continue to evolve, blinded payments may serve as one of several innovative tools aimed at creating a more patient‑centered and value‑driven environment.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, CMP Program, economics, finance, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: Blinded Medical Payments, david marcinko, healthcare economics, Healthcare Finance | Leave a comment »

Risk‑Based Medical Payment Models

Posted on February 26, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd CMP

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Risk‑based medical payment models have become one of the most significant shifts in modern health‑care financing. They move providers away from the traditional fee‑for‑service structure, where every test, visit, or procedure generates a separate payment, and toward arrangements that reward value, outcomes, and cost‑conscious care. This shift reflects a broader recognition that paying for volume alone can unintentionally encourage overuse, fragmentation, and rising costs. Risk‑based models attempt to realign incentives so that providers are financially accountable for the quality and efficiency of the care they deliver.

At the core of these models is the idea of financial risk transfer. Instead of insurers or government programs bearing the full cost of patient care, providers accept some degree of responsibility for spending that exceeds predetermined benchmarks. The level of risk can vary widely. Upside‑only arrangements allow providers to share in savings if they keep costs below expectations, while downside risk requires them to repay losses if spending surpasses targets. Full‑risk or global‑capitation models go even further, giving providers a fixed per‑patient payment to cover all necessary services. The more risk a provider assumes, the greater the potential reward—but also the greater the potential financial exposure.

***

One of the most widely used risk‑based models is the accountable care organization, or ACO. In an ACO, groups of physicians, hospitals, and other clinicians coordinate care for a defined population. They are measured on quality metrics such as preventive care, chronic disease management, and patient experience. If they meet quality standards while keeping total spending below a benchmark, they share in the savings. If they take on two‑sided risk, they may also owe money back when costs exceed expectations. The structure encourages collaboration, data sharing, and proactive management of high‑risk patients, all of which are difficult to achieve in a purely fee‑for‑service environment.

Bundled payments represent another important risk‑based approach. Instead of paying separately for each component of a treatment episode, such as a surgery and its follow‑up care, a bundled payment provides a single, predetermined amount for the entire episode. Providers must work together to deliver care efficiently within that budget. If they can do so while maintaining quality, they keep the difference as savings. If complications or inefficiencies drive costs above the bundle price, they absorb the loss. Bundled payments are particularly effective for procedures with predictable care pathways, such as joint replacements or cardiac interventions, and they encourage standardization and reduction of unnecessary variation.

Capitation, one of the oldest risk‑based models, assigns providers a fixed per‑member, per‑month payment to cover all or most services. This model creates strong incentives for preventive care, early intervention, and careful resource management. When implemented well, capitation can support integrated care delivery and long‑term population health strategies. However, it also requires robust infrastructure, accurate risk adjustment, and safeguards to ensure that cost control does not come at the expense of necessary care. Providers must be able to manage complex patients effectively, and payment rates must reflect the true needs of the population.

Risk adjustment is a critical component across all risk‑based models. Without it, providers who care for sicker or more socially complex patients could be unfairly penalized. Risk adjustment uses demographic and clinical data to estimate expected costs for each patient, ensuring that benchmarks and payments reflect the underlying health status of the population. Accurate risk adjustment protects against adverse selection and supports fairness, but it also requires sophisticated data systems and careful oversight to prevent gaming or upcoding.

Despite their promise, risk‑based payment models face challenges. Providers must invest in care‑management teams, data analytics, and interoperable technology to succeed. Smaller practices may struggle with the administrative and financial demands of taking on risk. Patients may also experience confusion if networks narrow or if care pathways become more structured. Policymakers and payers must balance incentives for efficiency with protections that ensure access and quality.

***

Even with these complexities, risk‑based models continue to expand because they offer a path toward a more sustainable and patient‑centered health‑care system. By rewarding outcomes rather than volume, they encourage providers to focus on prevention, coordination, and long‑term health. They also create opportunities for innovation in care delivery, from telehealth to home‑based services to integrated behavioral health. As health‑care costs continue to rise, risk‑based payment models represent a strategic attempt to align financial incentives with the goals of better care, healthier populations, and more efficient use of resources.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Accounting, Ask a Doctor, Career Development, CMP Program, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Investing, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: ACAO, capitation, CMP, david marcinko, financial risk, healthcare financing, Risk‑Based Medical Payment Models | Leave a comment »

TOP 10: Financial Scammers

Posted on February 25, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Financial fraud has long been woven into the fabric of American economic history. From Ponzi schemes to corporate deception, the United States has witnessed a series of high‑profile scandals that not only devastated investors but also reshaped regulatory frameworks. While the methods evolve with technology and time, the underlying motivations—greed, power, and the illusion of success—remain constant. This essay explores ten of the most notorious U.S. financial scammers whose actions left lasting scars on markets, institutions, and public trust.

1. Kenneth Lay & Jeffrey Skilling (Enron)

Few scandals loom as large as Enron, a company once hailed as an innovative energy titan before collapsing under the weight of its own deception. Enron executives Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling engineered an elaborate system of off‑balance‑sheet entities to hide debt and inflate earnings. The fraud, involving an estimated $74 billion, shattered investor confidence and triggered the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act, one of the most sweeping corporate governance reforms in U.S. history.

Their scheme demonstrated how corporate culture—when driven by unchecked ambition—can incentivize fraud at scale. Enron’s downfall remains a cautionary tale about transparency, oversight, and the dangers of financial engineering gone awry.

2. Bernie Madoff (Madoff Investment Securities)

Bernie Madoff orchestrated the largest Ponzi scheme in world history, defrauding investors of an estimated $65 billion. His reputation as a respected financier and former NASDAQ chairman allowed him to operate undetected for decades. Madoff’s scam unraveled during the 2008 financial crisis, exposing how trust, prestige, and secrecy can mask catastrophic fraud.

Though not directly cited in the retrieved sources, Madoff’s case is widely recognized as one of the most consequential financial crimes in U.S. history.

3. Andrew Fastow (Enron CFO)

While Lay and Skilling were the public faces of Enron, CFO Andrew Fastow was the architect behind the company’s labyrinth of special‑purpose vehicles (SPVs). These entities allowed Enron to hide massive liabilities while presenting a façade of profitability. Fastow personally profited from managing these off‑books partnerships, blurring the line between corporate officer and self‑interested operator. His actions exemplify how technical accounting knowledge can be weaponized to deceive investors.

4. Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos)

Elizabeth Holmes captivated Silicon Valley and Wall Street with promises of revolutionary blood‑testing technology. Theranos, valued at $9 billion at its peak, claimed it could run hundreds of tests from a single drop of blood. Investigations later revealed that the technology did not work, and the company relied on traditional machines while misleading investors, regulators, and patients.

Holmes’ downfall highlighted the dangers of hype‑driven investment culture and the need for scientific validation in health‑tech ventures.

5. Allen Stanford (Stanford Financial Group)

Allen Stanford ran a massive Ponzi scheme disguised as a global banking empire. Through fraudulent certificates of deposit issued by his Antigua‑based bank, Stanford defrauded investors of more than $7 billion. His charisma and lavish lifestyle helped him cultivate an image of legitimacy, masking the underlying fraud for years.

Stanford’s case underscored the vulnerabilities in cross‑border financial regulation and the risks of opaque offshore banking structures.

***

6. Jordan Belfort (Stratton Oakmont)

Popularized by The Wolf of Wall Street, Jordan Belfort’s pump‑and‑dump schemes in the 1990s defrauded investors through aggressive sales tactics and artificially inflated stock prices. While his crimes were smaller in scale than others on this list, Belfort’s cultural impact is enormous. His story illustrates how manipulation, high‑pressure sales, and market hype can devastate unsuspecting investors.

7. Charles Ponzi (The Original Ponzi Scheme)

Although his scheme dates back to the early 20th century, Charles Ponzi’s name remains synonymous with financial fraud. His promise of extraordinary returns through international postal coupon arbitrage attracted thousands of investors. When the scheme collapsed, it revealed the classic structure of a fraud model still used today: paying old investors with new investors’ money.

Ponzi’s legacy endures as a blueprint for countless modern scams.

8. Martin Shkreli (Turing Pharmaceuticals)

Martin Shkreli, often dubbed “Pharma Bro,” became infamous for dramatically raising the price of a life‑saving drug. While his price‑gouging was legal, Shkreli was later convicted of securities fraud unrelated to the drug scandal. His case illustrates how unethical behavior in one domain can draw scrutiny that uncovers deeper financial misconduct.

***

9. Sam Bankman‑Fried (FTX)

Sam Bankman‑Fried’s cryptocurrency exchange FTX collapsed in 2022 amid revelations of misused customer funds, lack of internal controls, and deceptive financial practices. Although crypto is a new frontier, the underlying fraud echoed classic themes: commingled funds, misleading investors, and unchecked executive power.

Bankman‑Fried’s downfall signaled a turning point in calls for crypto regulation and transparency.

10. Modern Imposter & Digital Scammers

While not tied to a single individual, modern imposter scams represent one of the fastest‑growing categories of financial fraud in the U.S. According to the Federal Trade Commission, Americans lost $5.8 billion to fraud in a single reporting year, with imposter scams leading the list. These schemes often involve criminals posing as government officials, financial advisors, or tech support agents to extract money or personal information.

Digital fraudsters exploit urgency, fear, and technological sophistication to deceive victims. As noted in recent analyses, imposter scams remain among the most prevalent and damaging forms of financial deception today.

Conclusion

The stories of these ten financial scammers reveal recurring themes: the power of perceived legitimacy, the exploitation of trust, and the persistent evolution of fraudulent tactics. From Enron’s corporate labyrinth to Madoff’s quiet betrayal, from Silicon Valley hype to digital‑age imposters, financial fraud continues to adapt to new technologies and cultural shifts.

Yet each scandal also brings progress. Regulatory reforms, improved oversight, and increased public awareness have emerged from the wreckage of these schemes. Understanding the methods and motivations of past scammers is essential to preventing future ones. As long as financial systems exist, so too will those who seek to exploit them—but informed vigilance remains society’s strongest defense.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: CMP Program, economics, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Investing, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: Bankman-Fried, belfort, crypto scams, david marcinko, design, digital scams, fastow, financial scammers, Holmes, Jeff Skilling, Ken Lay, Madoff, marketing, open-source, ponzie, Science, shkreli, skilling, Stanford, Technology | Leave a comment »

Medical Pay‑for‑Performance in Healthcare

Posted on February 24, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.HealthDictionarySeries.org

***

***

P-4-P DEFINED

Pay‑for‑performance (P4P) has become one of the most widely discussed strategies for improving healthcare quality in modern health systems. At its core, P4P links financial incentives to specific measures of performance, such as patient outcomes, adherence to clinical guidelines, or efficiency metrics. The idea is straightforward: reward providers for delivering high‑quality care, and they will be more motivated to improve their practices. Yet the simplicity of the concept masks a complex set of challenges, trade‑offs, and ethical considerations that shape how P4P functions in real‑world healthcare environments.

One of the primary arguments in favor of P4P is that it attempts to shift healthcare away from volume‑based reimbursement. Traditional fee‑for‑service models reward providers for doing more—more tests, more procedures, more visits—regardless of whether those services improve patient health. P4P, in contrast, aims to reward value rather than volume. By tying payment to outcomes or evidence‑based processes, the model encourages clinicians to focus on preventive care, chronic disease management, and coordination across the continuum of care. In theory, this alignment of financial incentives with patient well‑being should lead to better outcomes and more efficient use of resources.

***

Another potential benefit of P4P is its ability to promote transparency and accountability. When performance metrics are clearly defined and publicly reported, providers have a clearer understanding of expectations and benchmarks. This can foster a culture of continuous improvement, where clinicians and organizations regularly evaluate their performance and identify opportunities for better care. For patients, transparency can empower more informed decision‑making and build trust in the healthcare system.

Despite these advantages, P4P is far from a perfect solution. One of the most persistent criticisms is that performance metrics often fail to capture the full complexity of patient care. Healthcare outcomes are influenced by a wide range of factors, many of which lie outside a provider’s control, such as socioeconomic conditions, patient adherence, and comorbidities. When incentives are tied to outcomes without adequate risk adjustment, providers may be unfairly penalized for caring for more complex or disadvantaged populations. This can inadvertently discourage clinicians from accepting high‑risk patients, undermining equity in access to care.

Another challenge is the potential for P4P to encourage “teaching to the test.” When financial rewards depend on specific metrics, providers may focus narrowly on those measures at the expense of other important aspects of care that are harder to quantify. This can lead to a checkbox mentality, where meeting the metric becomes more important than understanding the patient’s broader needs. In extreme cases, P4P can even incentivize gaming the system, such as upcoding diagnoses to make patient populations appear sicker and performance outcomes appear better.

Implementation complexity also poses a barrier. Designing fair, meaningful, and comprehensive performance measures requires significant administrative effort. Providers must invest time and resources into documentation, data reporting, and quality improvement initiatives. Smaller practices, which often lack the infrastructure of large health systems, may struggle to keep up with these demands. If the administrative burden outweighs the financial incentives, P4P can become more of a bureaucratic hurdle than a driver of improvement.

***

Ultimately, the effectiveness of pay‑for‑performance depends on thoughtful design and careful balancing of incentives. When metrics are clinically meaningful, risk‑adjusted, and aligned with broader goals of patient‑centered care, P4P can encourage positive change. When poorly designed, it risks distorting provider behavior and exacerbating inequities. As healthcare systems continue to evolve, P4P will likely remain part of the conversation, but it must be integrated with other reforms—such as care coordination models, population health strategies, and patient engagement efforts—to truly enhance quality and value.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: david marcinko, Health Insurance, Healthcare Finance, Medical Pay‑for‑Performance, P-4-P, P4P | Leave a comment »

CRISIS: In Podiatric Medicine?

Posted on February 22, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

***

***

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBBS DPM MBA MEd

***

FORENSIC PODIATRY: Previously Unknown But Now in the Forefront

***

Stress, Burnout, Divorce, and Practice Turmoil

Podiatry, a specialized branch of medicine focused on diagnosing and treating conditions of the foot, ankle, and lower extremities, is often perceived as a stable and rewarding career. However, beneath the surface of clinical success and professional prestige lies a growing concern: the emotional and psychological toll of the profession. Stress, burnout, divorce, and practice turmoil are increasingly common among podiatrists, threatening not only their personal well-being but also the sustainability of their practices and the quality of patient care.

The Nature of Stress in Podiatry

Stress in podiatry arises from multiple sources. Clinical responsibilities, administrative burdens, patient expectations, and financial pressures converge to create a high-stakes environment. Podiatrists often work long hours, manage complex cases, and juggle the demands of running a business. The pressure to maintain high standards of care while navigating insurance reimbursements, staffing issues, and regulatory compliance can be overwhelming.

Moreover, podiatrists frequently deal with chronic conditions that require ongoing management rather than quick resolution. This can lead to emotional fatigue, especially when patients experience limited improvement or express dissatisfaction. The cumulative effect of these stressors can erode a podiatrist’s sense of purpose and satisfaction, leading to burnout.

Burnout: A Silent Epidemic

Burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment. In podiatry, it manifests as fatigue, irritability, cynicism, and a decline in empathy toward patients. Burnout not only affects the practitioner’s mental health but also compromises patient safety, increases the risk of medical errors, and contributes to staff turnover.

Studies have shown that healthcare professionals, including podiatrists, are at a higher risk of burnout compared to other professions. The isolation of solo practice, lack of peer support, and limited access to mental health resources exacerbate the problem. Without intervention, burnout can progress to depression, substance abuse, and even suicidal ideation.

PODIATRY PREP: Pass All Your Board Certification Examinations

Divorce and Personal Strain

The personal lives of podiatrists are not immune to the pressures of the profession. Divorce rates among physicians, including podiatrists, are notably high. The demands of the job often leave little time for family, leading to strained relationships and emotional disconnect. The stress of managing a practice can spill over into home life, creating tension and conflict.

Divorce, in turn, can intensify professional stress. Legal proceedings, financial settlements, and emotional upheaval can distract from clinical duties and disrupt practice operations. The dual burden of personal and professional turmoil can be devastating, leading to a downward spiral that affects every aspect of life.

Practice Turmoil: The Business of Healing

Running a podiatry practice is akin to managing a small business. Beyond clinical expertise, podiatrists must master marketing, human resources, billing, and compliance. Practice turmoil can arise from staff conflicts, financial mismanagement, poor patient retention, or changes in healthcare regulations.

For example, a sudden drop in reimbursements or a lawsuit can destabilize a practice. Staff turnover, especially among key personnel like office managers or billing specialists, can disrupt workflow and erode morale. Inadequate leadership or poor communication can lead to a toxic work environment, further fueling stress and burnout.

Addressing the Crisis

To combat these challenges, podiatrists must prioritize self-care, seek support, and implement systemic changes. Here are several strategies:

Mental Health Support: Regular counseling, peer support groups, and wellness programs can help podiatrists process stress and prevent burnout.
Work-Life Balance: Setting boundaries, delegating tasks, and scheduling personal time are essential for maintaining emotional health.
Practice Management Training: Investing in leadership and business education can improve operational efficiency and reduce turmoil.
Staff Engagement: Creating a positive work culture, recognizing achievements, and fostering open communication can enhance team cohesion.
Technology Integration: Utilizing electronic health records, telemedicine, and automation can streamline administrative tasks and reduce workload.

Professional organizations also play a vital role. The American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) and similar bodies can offer resources, advocacy, and continuing education to support practitioners. Medical schools and residency programs should incorporate wellness training and stress management into their curricula to prepare future podiatrists for the realities of the profession.

PODIATRIST: Types, Specialization and Salary

Conclusion

Podiatry is a noble and essential field, but it is not without its challenges. Stress, burnout, divorce, and practice turmoil are real and pressing issues that demand attention. By acknowledging these problems and taking proactive steps, podiatrists can safeguard their well-being, strengthen their practices, and continue to provide compassionate care to their patients. The path to healing begins not just with treating others, but with caring for oneself.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: ME-P Editor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Like, Refer and Subscribe

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Practice Management, Professional Liability, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: APMA, david marcinko, DNS, DPM, exchange-server, podiatric crisis, podiatric medicine, podiatrist, podiatry, powershell, system-center, windows-server | Leave a comment »

The Net Investment Income Tax

Posted on February 20, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. Gary Bode; MSA CPA CMP

Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd CMP

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Purpose, Scope and Impact

The Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) occupies a distinctive place in the modern U.S. tax landscape. Introduced as part of the Affordable Care Act, it was designed to generate revenue from higher‑income households by taxing certain forms of unearned income. Although it affects a relatively small portion of taxpayers, its implications reach into investment strategy, tax planning, and broader debates about fairness and economic policy. Understanding how the NIIT works—and why it exists—offers insight into the evolving relationship between tax policy and wealth in the United States.

At its core, the NIIT is a 3.8 percent surtax applied to specific types of investment income for individuals whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds statutory thresholds. These thresholds—$200,000 for single filers and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly—are not indexed for inflation. As a result, over time, more taxpayers may find themselves subject to the tax even if their real purchasing power has not increased. This “bracket creep” is one of the subtle but important features of the NIIT, shaping its long‑term reach.

The tax applies only to “net investment income,” a term that includes interest, dividends, capital gains, rental income, royalties, and passive business income. It does not apply to wages, self‑employment earnings, or distributions from qualified retirement plans. The logic behind this distinction is straightforward: the NIIT targets income derived from wealth rather than labor. In practice, this means that two taxpayers with identical total income may face different NIIT liabilities depending on how much of their income comes from investments versus work.

The mechanics of the NIIT involve a comparison between two amounts: net investment income and the excess of modified adjusted gross income over the applicable threshold. The tax is applied to whichever of these two figures is smaller. This structure ensures that the NIIT functions as a surtax on high‑income households without taxing investment income for those below the threshold. It also means that taxpayers with large investment portfolios but modest overall income may avoid the tax entirely, while those with high wages and relatively small investment income may still owe it.

One of the most significant effects of the NIIT is its influence on investment behavior. Because the tax applies to capital gains, it can affect decisions about when to sell appreciated assets. Taxpayers may choose to time sales to avoid pushing their income above the threshold in a given year. Others may shift toward tax‑exempt investments, such as municipal bonds, or toward assets that generate unrealized rather than realized gains. The NIIT therefore becomes not just a revenue tool but a factor shaping the broader investment landscape.

The tax also interacts with other parts of the tax code in ways that can be complex. For example, rental real estate income is generally subject to the NIIT unless the taxpayer qualifies as a real estate professional and materially participates in the activity. Trusts and estates face their own NIIT rules, often reaching the surtax threshold at much lower income levels than individuals. These layers of complexity mean that the NIIT is often a central topic in tax planning for high‑income households, especially those with diverse investment portfolios.

Beyond its technical features, the NIIT reflects broader policy debates about equity and the distribution of tax burdens. Supporters argue that it helps ensure that high‑income individuals contribute a fair share to the cost of public programs, particularly those related to health care. Because investment income is disproportionately concentrated among wealthier households, the NIIT is seen as a way to align tax policy with ability to pay. Critics, however, contend that the tax discourages investment, adds unnecessary complexity, and imposes an additional layer of taxation on income that may already be subject to corporate taxes or other levies.

Despite these debates, the NIIT has become a stable part of the federal tax system. It raises billions of dollars annually and plays a role in funding health‑related initiatives. As discussions about tax reform continue, the NIIT often resurfaces as policymakers consider how best to balance revenue needs with economic incentives. Whether it remains unchanged, is expanded, or is modified in future legislation, the NIIT will continue to shape the financial decisions of high‑income taxpayers and contribute to the ongoing conversation about how the United States taxes wealth.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, CMP Program, Experts Invited, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Taxation, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: ACA, accountant, CMP, CPA, david marcinko, economy, finance, Gary Bode, Health Insurance, income tax, interest rates, Investing, IRS, net investment income tax, NIIT, personal-finance, politics, tax | Leave a comment »

MORAVEC’S A.I. PARADOX: In Healthcare

Posted on January 25, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

***

***

A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one’s expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true or apparently true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time. They result in “persistent contradiction between interdependent elements” leading to a lasting “unity of opposites”.

MORAVEC’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HEALTHCARE PARADOX

Classic Definition: Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computer systems capable of performing complex tasks that historically only a human could do, such as reasoning, making decisions, or solving problems. The term “AI” describes a wide range of technologies that power many of the services and goods we use every day – from apps that recommend TV shows to chat-bots that provide customer support in real time.

Modern Circumstance: The role of artificial intelligence in health care is becoming an increasingly topical and controversial discussion. There remains uncertainty about what is achievable regarding ongoing medical artificial intelligence research. Although there are some people who believe that artificial intelligence will be used, at best, as a tool to assist clinicians in their day-to-day activities, there are others who believe that job automation and replacement is a looming threat.

***

Social HMOs

Paradox Example: Moravec’s paradox is a phenomenon observed by robotics researcher Hans Moravec, in which tasks that are easy for humans to perform (eg, motor or social skills) are difficult for machines to replicate, whereas tasks that are difficult for humans (eg, performing mathematical calculations or large-scale data analysis) are relatively easy for machines to accomplish.

***

***

For example, a computer-aided diagnostic system might be able to analyze large volumes of images quickly and accurately but might struggle to recognize clinical context or technical limitations that a human radiologist would easily identify.

Similarly, a machine learning algorithm might be able to predict a patient’s risk of a specific condition on the basis of their medical history and laboratory results but might not be able to account for the nuances of the patient’s individual case or consider the effect of social and environmental factors that a human physician would consider.

In surgery, there has been great progress in the field of robotics in health care when robotic elements are controlled by humans, but artificial intelligence-driven robotic technology has been much slower to develop.Thus far, research into clinical artificial intelligence has focused on improving diagnosis and predictive medicine.

Assessment

Moravec’s paradox also highlights the importance of maintaining a human element in the health-care system, and the need for collaboration between humans and technology to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Conclusion

In the field of medicine, it is becoming indisputable that artificial intelligence will have a role in population health analysis, predictive medicine, and personalized care.

However, for now, the job of doctors seems safe from automation.

Cite: Shuaib A: The increasing role of artificial intelligence in health care: will robots replace doctors in the future? Int J Gen Med. 2020; 13: 891-896

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, iMBA, Inc., Information Technology, Marcinko Associates, mental health | Tagged: AI, artificial intelligence, david marcinko, Hans Moravec, health, healthcare, mental health, Morovec's paradox, paradox, Technology | Leave a comment »

GOLD: In the Context of Portfolio Theory 2026

Posted on January 20, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

***

***

Gold has long been regarded as a cornerstone of wealth preservation, and its role within modern investment portfolios continues to attract scholarly attention. As both a tangible asset and a financial instrument, gold embodies characteristics that distinguish it from equities, fixed income securities, and other commodities. Its historical resilience, inflation-hedging capacity, and diversification benefits render it a subject of considerable importance in portfolio construction and risk management.

Historical and Monetary Significance

Gold’s enduring appeal is rooted in its function as a monetary standard and store of value. For centuries, gold underpinned global currency systems, most notably through the gold standard, which provided stability in international trade and monetary policy. Although fiat currencies have supplanted gold in official circulation, its symbolic and practical role as a measure of wealth persists. This historical continuity reinforces investor confidence in gold as a reliable repository of value during periods of economic uncertainty.

Inflation Hedge and Safe-Haven Asset

A substantial body of empirical research demonstrates that gold serves as a hedge against inflation and currency depreciation. When consumer prices rise and fiat currencies weaken, gold tends to appreciate, thereby preserving purchasing power. Moreover, gold’s status as a safe-haven asset is particularly evident during geopolitical crises, financial market turbulence, and systemic shocks. In such contexts, investors reallocate capital toward gold, seeking protection from volatility in traditional asset classes. This defensive quality underscores gold’s utility in stabilizing portfolios during adverse conditions.

Diversification and Risk Management

From the perspective of modern portfolio theory, gold offers diversification benefits due to its low correlation with equities and bonds. Incorporating gold into a portfolio reduces overall variance and enhances risk-adjusted returns. Studies suggest that even modest allocations—typically ranging from 5 to 10 percent—can improve portfolio resilience by mitigating downside risk. This non-correlation is especially valuable in environments characterized by heightened uncertainty, where traditional diversification strategies may prove insufficient.

Investment Vehicles and Accessibility

Gold’s versatility as an investment is reflected in the variety of instruments available to investors. Physical bullion, in the form of coins and bars, provides tangible ownership but entails storage and insurance costs. Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) offer liquidity and ease of access, while mining equities provide leveraged exposure to gold prices, albeit with operational risks. Futures contracts and derivatives enable sophisticated strategies, though they demand expertise and tolerance for volatility. The breadth of these vehicles ensures that gold remains accessible across diverse investor profiles.

Limitations and Critical Considerations

Despite its strengths, gold is not without limitations. Unlike equities or bonds, gold does not generate income, such as dividends or interest. This absence of yield can constrain long-term portfolio growth, particularly in low-inflation environments. Furthermore, gold prices are subject to volatility, influenced by investor sentiment, central bank policies, and global demand dynamics. Overexposure to gold may therefore hinder portfolio performance, underscoring the necessity of balanced allocation.

Conclusion

Gold’s dual identity as a historical store of value and a contemporary financial instrument secures its relevance in portfolio construction. Its inflation-hedging capacity, safe-haven qualities, and diversification benefits justify its inclusion as a strategic asset. Nevertheless, prudent management is essential, given its lack of yield and susceptibility to volatility. Within a scholarly framework of portfolio theory, gold emerges not as a panacea but as a complementary asset, enhancing resilience and stability in the face of evolving economic landscapes.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Alternative Investments, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Health Law & Policy, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management, Risk Management | Tagged: diversification, economy, ETFs, finance, gold, gold bars, gold coins, gold standard, inflation hedge, Investing, Marcinko, money, personal-finance, Risk Management, store of wealth, Wealth | Leave a comment »

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: Tariffs in the Healthcare System

Posted on January 17, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

http://www.DavidEdwardMarcinko.com

***

***

The Impact of Medical Equipment Tariffs on Healthcare Systems

Tariffs on medical equipment have become a contentious issue in global trade and healthcare policy, particularly in the United States. These import taxes, designed to protect domestic industries and generate government revenue, can have unintended consequences when applied to essential healthcare supplies. As the U.S. healthcare system relies heavily on imported medical devices, consumables, and components, tariffs can significantly affect costs, accessibility, and innovation.

One of the most immediate impacts of medical equipment tariffs is the increase in operational costs for hospitals and healthcare providers. According to the American Hospital Association, the U.S. imported nearly $15 billion in medical equipment in 2024, much of it from countries like China. Recent tariff hikes on items such as syringes, respirators, gloves, and medical masks have raised concerns about affordability and supply chain stability. These cost increases are particularly burdensome for rural hospitals and smaller health systems, which operate on tighter budgets and have less flexibility to absorb price shocks.

Tariffs also disrupt supply chains by introducing unpredictability into procurement strategies. Unlike market-driven price changes, tariffs are policy-based and often implemented with little warning. This volatility can affect everything from disposable supplies to high-tech imaging equipment. Long-term contracts may temporarily shield hospitals from tariff impacts, but as these agreements expire, renegotiations often reflect the new cost realities. Manufacturers, in turn, may respond by relocating production, adding surcharges, or reducing product lines to manage tariff-related risks.

Beyond cost and logistics, tariffs can hinder innovation in the medical field. Many U.S.-based manufacturers rely on imported components to build advanced medical devices. When these parts become more expensive due to tariffs, companies may scale back research and development or pass costs onto consumers. This can slow the adoption of cutting-edge technologies and reduce the competitiveness of domestic firms in the global market.

***

From a policy perspective, the rationale for imposing tariffs on medical equipment is often rooted in national security and economic protectionism. However, critics argue that such measures may weaken health security by limiting access to critical supplies during emergencies, such as pandemics or natural disasters. The National Taxpayers Union has emphasized that tariffs on personal protective equipment and other medical goods can undermine preparedness and increase vulnerability.

To mitigate these challenges, healthcare systems and policymakers must explore strategic solutions. These include advocating for tariff exemptions on essential medical supplies, diversifying sourcing strategies, and investing in domestic manufacturing capabilities. Additionally, standardizing procurement practices and implementing cost-saving measures can help health systems navigate tariff-related pressures more effectively.

In conclusion, while tariffs may serve broader economic goals, their application to medical equipment demands careful consideration. The stakes are high—not just in terms of dollars, but in the quality and accessibility of patient care. A balanced approach that protects domestic interests without compromising health outcomes is essential for a resilient and equitable healthcare system.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Ask a Doctor, Drugs and Pharma, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Managed Care, Management, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: AHA, American Hospital Association, chemistry-lab-equipment, david marcinko, healthcare tariffs, lab-equipment, laboratory-equipment, medical, medical equipment, medical tariffs, Science, supply chain | Leave a comment »

PHYSICIANS: Gambling Addiction Causes

Posted on January 8, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

By Professor Eugene Schmuckler PhD MBA MEd CTS

***

***

Physician gambling addiction is a growing concern that threatens both personal well-being and professional integrity. This essay explores its causes, consequences, and the urgent need for awareness and support.

Gambling addiction, or gambling disorder, is a recognized mental health condition characterized by an uncontrollable urge to gamble despite negative consequences. While it affects about 1% of the general population., its presence among physicians is particularly alarming due to the high stakes involved—both financially and ethically. Physicians are entrusted with lives, and addiction can impair judgment, compromise patient care, and lead to devastating personal and professional outcomes.

Several factors contribute to gambling addiction in physicians. The profession is inherently high-pressure, with long hours, emotional strain, and frequent exposure to trauma. These stressors can drive individuals to seek escape or excitement through gambling. Moreover, physicians often have access to substantial financial resources, making it easier to sustain gambling habits longer than others. The culture of perfectionism and stigma around mental health in medicine may also discourage seeking help, allowing addiction to fester in secrecy.

The consequences of gambling addiction for physicians are multifaceted. On a personal level, it can lead to financial ruin, strained relationships, and deteriorating mental health. Studies show that gambling activates the brain’s reward system similarly to drugs and alcohol, reinforcing compulsive behavior.

Professionally, addiction can result in medical errors, fraud, or even criminal activity—such as embezzling funds to cover gambling debts. These actions not only endanger patients but also erode public trust in the medical profession.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, gambling behavior intensified across many demographics, including healthcare workers. Increased isolation, stress, and access to online gambling platforms contributed to a surge in addiction cases. Physicians, already burdened by the pandemic’s demands, were particularly vulnerable. The rise of sports betting and fantasy leagues has further blurred the lines between entertainment and addiction, making it harder to recognize problematic behavior.

***

Addressing physician gambling addiction requires a multifaceted approach. First, medical institutions must foster a culture that encourages mental health support without stigma. Confidential counseling services, peer support groups, and educational programs can help physicians recognize and address addiction early. Licensing boards and hospitals should implement policies that balance accountability with rehabilitation, ensuring that affected physicians receive treatment rather than punishment alone.

Additionally, research into gambling disorder must continue to evolve. Institutions like Yale Medicine are leading efforts to understand the neurological and genetic underpinnings of addiction, which could inform more effective treatments. Public awareness campaigns can also help destigmatize gambling addiction and promote responsible behavior.

In conclusion, physician gambling addiction is a hidden crisis with far-reaching implications. It stems from a complex interplay of stress, access, and stigma, and its consequences can be catastrophic.

By promoting awareness, support, and research, the medical community can better protect its members and the patients they serve.

COMMENTS APPRECIATION

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Ethics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, LifeStyle, mental health | Tagged: anxiety, casino, depression, gambling addictions, gambling dds, gambling disoirder, gambling do, gambling doctors, gambling dpm, gambling md, gambling physicians, health, mental health, trauma | Leave a comment »

COMPOUNDING PHARMACY: Disadvantages

Posted on November 23, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

⚠️ Cons of Compounding Pharmacies

1. Quality and Safety Concerns

Medications are not FDA-approved, meaning they don’t go through the same rigorous testing as commercial drugs.
Risk of contamination or incorrect formulation if strict standards aren’t followed.
Potency can vary between batches, leading to inconsistent therapeutic effects.

2. Limited Regulation

Oversight is less stringent compared to mass-produced pharmaceuticals.
Standards may differ depending on the state or the specific pharmacy.
Patients may not always know whether their compounding pharmacy meets high-quality benchmarks.

3. Insurance and Cost Issues

Compounded medications are often not covered by insurance.
They can be more expensive due to customization and small-scale production.

4. Availability and Accessibility

Not all pharmacies offer compounding services.
Patients may need to travel farther or wait longer to receive their medication.

***

5. Evidence and Efficacy

Limited clinical trials or scientific evidence supporting compounded formulations.
Effectiveness may rely heavily on anecdotal reports rather than standardized studies.

6. Risk of Errors

Human error in measuring, mixing, or labeling can lead to incorrect dosages.
Lack of standardized packaging may increase confusion for patients.

👉 In short: while compounding pharmacies can provide personalized solutions, the downsides include less regulation, higher costs, safety risks, and limited evidence of efficacy compared to FDA-approved medications.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Subscribe and Refer

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Drugs and Pharma, Ethics, Health Law & Policy, iMBA, Inc., Marcinko Associates | Tagged: compounding pharmacy, costs, david marcinko, DEA, Drugs, FDA, health, healthcare, medicine, pharmacist, prescriptions, quality, Rx, safety, Technology | Leave a comment »

SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

Posted on November 20, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Shaping Well-being Beyond Medicine

Health is often thought of as the result of medical care, but in reality, it is deeply influenced by the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. These conditions, known as social determinants of health, include a wide range of social, economic, and environmental factors that shape health outcomes. They are responsible for many of the differences in health status between individuals and communities. Understanding these determinants is essential for promoting fairness in health and designing policies that reduce disparities.

Economic Stability

Economic stability is one of the most powerful determinants of health. Individuals with steady income can afford nutritious food, safe housing, and preventive healthcare. Conversely, poverty increases vulnerability to chronic diseases, mental health challenges, and limited access to medical services. Families with fewer financial resources may struggle to afford medications or healthy diets, leading to higher rates of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Unemployment or unstable work further exacerbates stress, which itself is linked to poor health outcomes. Economic inequality directly translates into health inequality.

Education

Education shapes health both directly and indirectly. Higher educational attainment is associated with better employment opportunities, higher income, and improved health literacy. People with more education are more likely to understand medical information, adopt healthy behaviors, and navigate healthcare systems effectively. Limited education can perpetuate cycles of poverty and poor health. For instance, children who grow up in underfunded schools may face restricted opportunities, leading to lower lifetime earnings and poorer health outcomes. Education is therefore a critical lever for breaking intergenerational cycles of disadvantage.

***

Neighborhood and Physical Environment

The environment in which individuals live plays a crucial role in determining health. Safe neighborhoods with clean air, accessible parks, and reliable transportation promote physical activity and reduce exposure to pollutants. In contrast, communities with high crime rates, poor housing, and environmental hazards contribute to stress, injury, and illness. Food deserts—areas with limited access to affordable, healthy food—are a striking example of how environment shapes health. Residents in these areas often rely on processed foods, increasing risks of obesity and related diseases. Housing quality also matters: overcrowding, mold, or lead exposure can lead to respiratory illnesses and developmental delays.

Healthcare Access and Quality

Access to healthcare is a fundamental determinant, but it is shaped by social and economic factors. Insurance coverage, affordability, and cultural competence of providers influence whether individuals receive timely and effective care. Marginalized groups often face barriers such as discrimination, language differences, or lack of nearby facilities. Even when healthcare is available, disparities in quality persist. For example, minority populations may receive less aggressive treatment for certain conditions compared to others. Addressing these inequities requires systemic reforms that prioritize inclusivity and affordability.

Social and Community Context

Social relationships and community support networks significantly affect health. Strong social ties provide emotional support, reduce stress, and encourage healthy behaviors. Communities with high levels of trust and civic engagement often experience better health outcomes. Conversely, discrimination, racism, and social exclusion undermine health by increasing stress and limiting opportunities. Social cohesion and equity are therefore vital for fostering healthier societies.

Conclusion

The social determinants of health highlight that medicine alone cannot ensure well-being. Economic stability, education, environment, healthcare access, and social context collectively shape health outcomes and drive disparities. Addressing these determinants requires a holistic approach that integrates public health, social policy, and community action. By investing in education, reducing poverty, improving neighborhoods, and ensuring equitable healthcare, societies can move closer to achieving health equity. Ultimately, health is not just about treating illness—it is about creating conditions in which everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Quality Initiatives, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: david marcinko, Ethics, health, healthcare, mental health, Population Health, public health, SDH, social determinants health, wellness | Leave a comment »

PHYSICIAN PAYMENT: Direct Reimbursement Models

Posted on November 13, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

BASIC DEFINITIONS

***

***

The Direct Reimbursement Payment Model allows physicians to receive payment directly from patients or employers, bypassing traditional insurance systems. This model emphasizes transparency, autonomy, and personalized care, offering an alternative to fee-for-service and managed care structures.

The Direct Reimbursement Payment Model is a healthcare financing approach in which physicians are paid directly by patients or sponsoring entities—such as employers—rather than through insurance companies or government programs. This model is gaining traction as a response to the administrative burdens, opaque billing practices, and fragmented care often associated with traditional insurance-based systems.

One prominent example of direct reimbursement is Direct Primary Care (DPC). In DPC, patients pay a recurring fee—monthly, quarterly, or annually—that covers a broad range of primary care services. These include routine checkups, preventive screenings, chronic disease management, and basic lab work. By eliminating third-party billing, DPC practices reduce overhead costs and administrative complexity, allowing physicians to spend more time with patients and focus on quality care.

***

Employers have also embraced direct reimbursement models to manage healthcare costs and improve employee wellness. In such arrangements, employers reimburse physicians or clinics directly for services rendered to their employees, often through a defined benefit structure. This can be part of a self-funded health plan or a supplemental offering alongside high-deductible insurance policies. The goal is to provide accessible, cost-effective care while avoiding the inefficiencies of traditional insurance networks.

Key advantages of the direct reimbursement model include:

Price transparency: Patients know upfront what services cost, reducing surprise billing and financial stress.
Improved access: Physicians often offer same-day or next-day appointments, extended visits, and direct communication via phone or email.
Lower administrative burden: Without insurance paperwork, practices can operate more efficiently and focus on patient care.
Stronger patient-physician relationships: More time per visit fosters trust, continuity, and better health outcomes.

However, the model is not without limitations. Direct reimbursement may not cover specialist care, hospitalization, or emergency services, requiring patients to maintain supplemental insurance. Additionally, the model may be less accessible to low-income populations who cannot afford recurring fees or out-of-pocket payments. Critics also argue that widespread adoption could fragment care and reduce risk pooling, undermining the broader goals of universal coverage.

Despite these concerns, the direct reimbursement model aligns with broader trends in healthcare reform, including value-based care, consumer empowerment, and decentralized service delivery. It offers a viable path for physicians seeking autonomy and for patients desiring personalized, transparent care. As healthcare continues to evolve, hybrid models that combine direct reimbursement with traditional insurance may emerge, offering flexibility and choice across diverse patient populations.

In conclusion, the Direct Reimbursement Payment Model represents a meaningful shift in how healthcare services are financed and delivered.

By prioritizing simplicity, transparency, and patient-centered care, it challenges the status quo and opens new possibilities for sustainable, high-quality medical practice.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Career Development, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Insurance Matters, Managed Care, Marketing & Advertising | Tagged: ACOs, david marcinko, direct primary are, direct reimbursement payment, DO, doctors, DPC, DPM, health, healthcare, MD, mental health, physicians, value based csare, VBC | Leave a comment »

Understanding the Risks of Capitation in Healthcare

Posted on November 8, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By A.I.

***

***

The Pitfalls of Capitation in Medicine

Capitation, a payment model in healthcare where providers receive a fixed amount per patient regardless of the services rendered, has been promoted as a way to control costs and incentivize efficiency. However, despite its theoretical appeal, capitation medicine presents significant drawbacks that can compromise patient care, distort provider incentives, and exacerbate systemic inequities.

One of the most concerning aspects of capitation is the potential for under-treatment. Since providers are paid a set fee per patient, regardless of how much care that patient requires, there is a financial incentive to minimize services. This can lead to situations where necessary tests, referrals, or treatments are delayed or denied in order to preserve profit margins. Patients with complex or chronic conditions—who require more frequent and intensive care—may be especially vulnerable under this model. The risk is that medical decisions become driven by cost containment rather than clinical need, undermining the ethical foundation of healthcare.

NURSING CAPITATION: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/07/07/on-nursing-capitation-reimbursement/

Capitation also introduces challenges in maintaining quality standards. Unlike value-based care, which ties reimbursement to outcomes, capitation focuses solely on cost predictability. Without robust oversight and accountability mechanisms, providers may cut corners or avoid high-risk patients altogether. This can result in cherry-picking, where healthier individuals are favored, and sicker patients are subtly discouraged from enrolling. Such practices not only distort the patient pool but also deepen health disparities, particularly among marginalized populations who already face barriers to care.

Furthermore, capitation can strain the provider-patient relationship. Physicians may feel pressured to limit time spent with each patient or avoid costly interventions, leading to a sense of transactional care rather than personalized attention. This erosion of trust can diminish patient satisfaction and reduce adherence to treatment plans. In a system where providers are rewarded for doing less, the intrinsic motivation to go above and beyond for patients may be compromised.

Operationally, capitation demands sophisticated infrastructure to manage risk, track utilization, and ensure compliance. Smaller practices or those serving underserved communities may lack the resources to implement such systems effectively. This can create a two-tiered system where well-funded organizations thrive while others struggle to deliver basic care. Additionally, the administrative burden of managing capitation contracts, monitoring performance metrics, and navigating complex reimbursement rules can divert attention from clinical priorities.

Critics also argue that capitation may stifle innovation. When providers are locked into fixed budgets, there is little room to experiment with new technologies, therapies, or care models that might improve outcomes but carry upfront costs. This conservative approach can hinder progress and limit access to cutting-edge treatments.

CAPITATION HISTORY: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/09/15/capitation-reimbursement-a-historical-economic-review/

In conclusion, while capitation medicine aims to control costs and streamline care, its inherent risks—under-treatment, inequity, and diminished quality—make it a problematic model when not carefully regulated. To truly reform healthcare, payment systems must balance financial sustainability with ethical responsibility, ensuring that every patient receives the care they need, not just the care that fits a budget.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, business, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Managed Care | Tagged: capitated medicine, capitation, DDS, DO, doctors, financia pitfalls, managedcare, MD, medical payment models, physicians | Leave a comment »

Site-Neutral Payments Still a Long Ways Off

Posted on November 7, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

An October 2025 Health Affairs study found that payment equity between facilities owned by hospitals, known as hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs), and independent outpatient facilities such as ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), is still far from reality. Comparing payments for common procedures, researchers found commercial prices were 78% higher in HOPDs compared to ASCs, although payment differentials varied considerably.

This Health Capital Topics article reviews the article and potential policy implications. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Drugs and Pharma, Experts Invited, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance | Tagged: ambulatory surgery center, ASC, ASCs, Health Affasirs, Health Capital Topics, HOPDs, hospital outpatient departments, hospitals, Jessica Bailey-Wheaton, TODD A. ZIGRANG | Leave a comment »

Senate Hearing Signals Potential Changes to the 340B Drug Discount Program

Posted on November 3, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

***

***

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

On October 23, 2025, both Democratic and Republican lawmakers expressed support during a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee hearing for reforming the 340B Drug Discount Program. Although senators acknowledged that any reform would necessitate an intentional, considered approach to mitigate unintended consequences, the bipartisan agreement (particularly during a government shutdown deadlocked on healthcare) indicates that changes to the program may be on the horizon.

This Health Capital Topics article outlines the 340B program, discusses issues that have made the program controversial, and discusses potential reform options. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Alerts Sign-Up, Ask a Doctor, Drugs and Pharma, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: 340B, 340B drug discount program, drug discount, drug discount program, EDUCATION: Books, HCC, Health Capital Consultants LLC, Health Capital Topics, HELP, Jessica Bailey-Wheaton, TODD A. ZIGRANG | Leave a comment »

Government Shutdown Update: Healthcare Impacts Deepen

Posted on November 2, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

Since lawmakers failed to pass a bill to fund the federal government before the September 30, 2025 deadline, lawmakers have remained deadlocked over the spending bill. The deadlock is centered on the continuation of health insurance exchange subsidies, but the shutdown has broader implications on the healthcare industry.

This Health Capital Topics article provides an update on the continuing saga. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Book Reviews, Drugs and Pharma, Ethics, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance | Tagged: Government Shutdown, HCC, Health Capital Consultants LLC, Jessica Bailey-Wheaton, TODD A. ZIGRANG | Leave a comment »

A MODERN PRESCRIPTION SHOWDOWN: Amazon Pharmacy VS. GoodRx

Posted on October 28, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

In the evolving landscape of digital health care, Amazon Pharmacy and GoodRx have emerged as two leading platforms offering consumers affordable and convenient access to prescription medications. While both aim to simplify the process of obtaining prescriptions, they differ significantly in their approach, pricing models, and user experience.

Amazon Pharmacy, launched in 2020, is a full-service online pharmacy that allows customers to order medications directly through Amazon. It offers fast, free delivery for Prime members and integrates with most insurance plans. One of its standout features is RxPass, a subscription service available to Prime members for $5 per month, which covers unlimited eligible generic medications. This model is particularly attractive to individuals who take multiple generics regularly, as it can significantly reduce out-of-pocket costs.

In contrast, GoodRx, founded in 2011, operates primarily as a price comparison and discount platform. It does not dispense medications itself but partners with local and mail-order pharmacies to help users find the lowest prices. GoodRx provides coupons that can be used at thousands of pharmacies nationwide, often resulting in substantial savings—especially for those without insurance. It also offers GoodRx Gold, a paid membership that unlocks deeper discounts and telehealth services.

***

When comparing the two, pricing transparency is a key differentiator. GoodRx excels in showing users a range of prices across different pharmacies, empowering them to choose the most cost-effective option. Amazon Pharmacy, while competitive, typically offers fixed prices and focuses more on convenience and integration with its broader ecosystem.

Convenience is another area where Amazon Pharmacy shines. With its streamlined ordering process, automatic refills, and integration with Amazon’s delivery network, it appeals to users who prioritize ease and speed. GoodRx, while convenient in its own right, requires users to present coupons at the pharmacy or use mail-order services, which may involve more steps.

Insurance compatibility also varies. Amazon Pharmacy accepts most major insurance plans, making it a viable option for insured individuals. GoodRx, on the other hand, is often used by those without insurance or with high deductibles, as its discounts can sometimes beat insurance copays.

However, both platforms have limitations. Amazon Pharmacy’s RxPass is restricted to generic medications and excludes certain states due to regulatory issues. GoodRx’s discounts may not apply to all medications, and prices can fluctuate depending on location and pharmacy.

In terms of user experience, Amazon offers a seamless, tech-driven interface with customer support and medication management tools. GoodRx provides educational resources, price alerts, and a mobile app that helps users track savings and prescriptions.

Ultimately, the choice between Amazon Pharmacy and GoodRx depends on individual needs. For those seeking a one-stop solution with predictable costs and fast delivery, Amazon Pharmacy may be ideal. For users who want to shop around for the best deal or lack insurance, GoodRx offers unmatched flexibility and savings.

As digital health continues to grow, both platforms are reshaping how Americans access medications—making prescriptions more affordable, transparent, and accessible than ever before.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Drugs and Pharma, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: Amazon Pharmacy, david marcinko, drug discount platform, drug price comparison, drug refills, Drugs, GoodRx, goodRX gold, health, Health Insurance, healthcare, insurance, Managed Care, medicare, prescriptions, price comparisons for drugs, RxPass, teleHealth, telemedicine | Leave a comment »

PPMC: Physician Practice Management Corporation

Posted on October 23, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

DEFINED

***

***

A physician practice management corporation (PPMC) is a business entity that provides non-clinical administrative and operational support to medical practices, allowing physicians to focus on patient care while the corporation handles the business side of healthcare.

Physician practice management corporations emerged in response to the increasing complexity of running a medical practice. As healthcare regulations, insurance requirements, and operational costs grew, many physicians found it challenging to manage both clinical responsibilities and business operations. PPMCs offer a solution by taking over the administrative burdens, enabling physicians to concentrate on delivering quality care.

At their core, PPMCs are responsible for a wide range of non-medical services. These include billing and coding, human resources, payroll, marketing, compliance, information technology, and financial management. By centralizing these functions, PPMCs can achieve economies of scale, reduce overhead costs, and improve operational efficiency for the practices they manage. This model is particularly attractive to small and mid-sized practices that may lack the resources to manage these functions independently.

PPMCs typically enter into long-term management agreements with physician groups. In some cases, they may purchase the non-clinical assets of a practice—such as equipment, office space, and administrative staff—while the physicians retain control over clinical decisions and patient care. This arrangement allows for a clear division between medical and business responsibilities, which is essential for maintaining compliance with healthcare regulations like the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute.

PPMCs: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2019/11/18/on-the-ppmcs-of-yester-year-and-today/

***

One of the key advantages of working with a PPMC is access to capital and advanced infrastructure. PPMCs often invest in state-of-the-art electronic health record (EHR) systems, data analytics tools, and revenue cycle management platforms. These technologies can enhance patient care, streamline operations, and improve financial performance. Additionally, PPMCs may offer strategic guidance on practice expansion, mergers and acquisitions, and payer contract negotiations.

However, the relationship between physicians and PPMCs must be carefully managed. While PPMCs bring valuable expertise and resources, there is a risk that business priorities could overshadow clinical autonomy. To mitigate this, successful PPMCs prioritize physician engagement, transparent governance, and aligned incentives. They work collaboratively with physicians to ensure that business strategies support, rather than hinder, the delivery of high-quality care.

The physician practice management industry has evolved significantly over the past few decades. After a wave of failures in the 1990s due to overexpansion and misaligned incentives, modern PPMCs have adopted more sustainable and physician-centric models. Today, they play a crucial role in helping practices adapt to value-based care, population health management, and other emerging trends in healthcare delivery.

In conclusion, a physician practice management corporation serves as a strategic partner to medical practices, offering the business acumen and operational support needed to thrive in a complex healthcare environment. By offloading administrative tasks and providing access to advanced resources, PPMCs empower physicians to focus on what they do best—caring for patients—while ensuring the long-term success and sustainability of their practices.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Career Development, Glossary Terms, Health Law & Policy, Management, Marcinko Associates, Practice Management | Tagged: Anti-Kickback Statute, david marcinko, health, healthcare, medicine, physician practice management, physician practicement corporations, PPMC, PPMCs, Stark laws, Technology | Leave a comment »

SOCIALIZED MEDICINE: Can it Save Healthcare in the USA

Posted on October 20, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Can Socialized Medicine Save U.S. Healthcare?

The U.S. healthcare system is often criticized for its high costs, unequal access, and inconsistent outcomes. With nearly 30 million Americans uninsured and many more underinsured, the question arises: could socialized medicine be the solution to these systemic issues?

Socialized medicine refers to a system where the government owns and operates healthcare facilities and employs medical professionals, funded primarily through taxation. While the term is often used pejoratively in American discourse, countries like the United Kingdom and Sweden have long embraced such models. These systems guarantee universal access to healthcare, regardless of income or employment status.

One of the strongest arguments in favor of socialized medicine is its potential to reduce overall healthcare costs. In the U.S., administrative expenses, profit margins, and fragmented billing systems contribute to exorbitant prices. A centralized system could streamline operations, negotiate better drug prices, and eliminate the need for private insurance middlemen. Countries with socialized systems typically spend less per capita on healthcare while achieving comparable or better health outcomes.

Moreover, socialized medicine could address the issue of healthcare access. In the current U.S. model, losing a job often means losing health insurance. Even with the Affordable Care Act, many Americans face high premiums and deductibles. A government-run system would ensure that healthcare is a right, not a privilege, and that no one is denied care due to financial constraints.

***

However, critics argue that socialized medicine could lead to longer wait times, reduced innovation, and lower quality of care. They point to examples in Canada and the U.K. where patients sometimes wait weeks or months for non-emergency procedures. Additionally, skeptics fear that government control could stifle competition and reduce incentives for medical advancement.

Yet, these concerns may be overstated. Many countries with socialized systems still foster innovation through public-private partnerships and maintain high standards of care. France, for example, combines universal coverage with private providers and consistently ranks among the top healthcare systems globally.

Transitioning to socialized medicine in the U.S. would be a monumental task, requiring political will, public support, and a reimagining of healthcare financing. It would disrupt entrenched interests, including insurance companies and pharmaceutical firms. But if the goal is to create a more equitable, efficient, and humane system, socialized medicine deserves serious consideration.

In conclusion, while not a panacea, socialized medicine offers a compelling framework for addressing the deep-rooted problems in U.S. healthcare. By prioritizing access, affordability, and public health over profit, it could pave the way for a healthier and more just society.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Ethics, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Managed Care, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: ACA, david marcinko, PP-ACA, socialized healthcare, socialized medicine, US haelthcare, US healthcare | Leave a comment »

Unlock Your Career with Micro-Certifications

Posted on October 19, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Micro-Credentials on the Rise

KNOWLEDGE RICHES IN SPECIALTY NICHES

DR. DAVID EDWARD MARCINKO MBA MEd CMP™

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Do you ever wish you could acquire specific information for your career activities without having to complete a university Master’s Degree or finish our entire Certified Medical Planner™ professional designation program? Well, Micro-Certifications from the Institute of Medical Business Advisors, Inc., might be the answer. Read on to learn how our three Micro-Certifications offer new opportunities for professional growth in the medical practice, business management, health economics and financial planning, investing and advisory space for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals.

Micro-Certification Basics

Stock-Brokers, Financial Advisors, Investment Advisors, Accountants, Consultants, Financial Analyists and Financial Planners need to enhance their knowledge skills to better serve the changing and challenging healthcare professional ecosystem. But, it can be difficult to learn and demonstrate mastery of these new skills to employers, clients, physicians or medical prospects. This makes professional advancement difficult. That’s where Micro-Certification and Micro-Credentialing enters the online educational space. It is the process of earning a Micro-Certification, which is like a mini-degree or mini-credential, in a very specific topical area.

Micro-Certification Requirements

Once you’ve completed all of the requirements for our Micro-Certification, you will be awarded proof that you’ve earned it. This might take the form of a paper or digital certificate, which may be a hard document or electronic image, transcript, file, or other official evidence that you’ve completed the necessary work.

Uses of Micro-Certifications

Micro-Certifications may be used to demonstrate to physicians prospective medical clients that you’ve mastered a certain knowledge set. Because of this, Micro-Certifications are useful for those financial service professionals seeking medical clients, employment or career advancement opportunities.

Examples of iMBA, Inc., Micro-Certifications

Here are the three most popular Micro-Certification course from the Institute of Medical Business Advisors, Inc:

1. Health Insurance and Managed Care: To keep up with the ever-changing field of health care physician advice, you must learn new medical practice business models in order to attract and assist physicians and nurse clients. By bringing together the most up-to-date business and medical prctice models [Medicare, Medicaid, PP-ACA, POSs, EPOs, HMOs, PPOs, IPA’s, PPMCs, Accountable Care Organizations, Concierge Medicine, Value Based Care, Physician Pay-for-Performance Initiatives, Hospitalists, Retail and Whole-Sale Medicine, Health Savings Accounts and Medical Unions, etc], this iMBA Inc., Mini-Certification offers a wealth of essential information that will help you understand the ever-changing practices in the next generation of health insurance and managed medical care.
2. Health Economics and Finance: Medical economics, finance, managerial and cost accounting is an integral component of the health care industrial complex. It is broad-based and covers many other industries: insurance, mathematics and statistics, public and population health, provider recruitment and retention, health policy, forecasting, aging and long-term care, and Venture Capital are all commingled arenas. It is essential knowledge that all financial services professionals seeking to serve in the healthcare advisory niche space should possess.
3. Health Information Technology and Security: There is a myth that all physician focused financial advisors understand Health Information Technology [HIT]. In truth, it is often economically misused or financially misunderstood. Moreover, an emerging national HIT architecture often puts the financial advisor or financial planner in a position of maximum uncertainty and minimum productivity regarding issues like: Electronic Medical Records [EMRs] or Electronic Health Records [EHRs], mobile health, tele-health or tele-medicine, Artificial Intelligence [AI], benefits managers and human resource professionals.

Other Topics include: economics, finance, investing, marketing, advertising, sales, start-ups, business plan creation, financial planning and entrepreneurship, etc.

How to Start Learning and Earning Recognition for Your Knowledge

Now that you’re familiar with Micro-Credentialing, you might consider earning a Micro-Certification with us. We offer 3 official Micro-Certificates by completing a one month online course, with a live instructor consisting of twelve asynchronous lessons/online classes [3/wk X 4/weeks = 12 classes]. The earned official completion certificate can be used to demonstrate mastery of a specific skill set and shared with current or future employers, current clients or medical niche financial advisory prospects.

Mini-Certification Tuition, Books and Related Fees

The tuition for each Mini-Certification live online course is $1,250 with the purchase of one required dictionary handbook. Other additional guides, white-papers, videos, files and e-content are all supplied without charge. Alternative courses may be developed in the future subject to demand and may change without notice.

***

Contact: For more information, or to speak with an academic representative, please contact Ann Miller RN MHA CMP™ at Email: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com [24/7].

***

Filed under: "Advisors Only", "Ask-an-Advisor", Book Reviews, Career Development, CMP Program, Experts Invited, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Information Technology, Investing, Op-Editorials, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: accountants, certifications, certified medical planner, CMP, financial advisors, financial planners, investment advisors, Marcinko, micro, micro-certifications, micro-credentials | Leave a comment »

Essential Glossary of Health Insurance Terms

Posted on October 17, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Click to access mike-stahl-phd-mba.pdf

ORDER HERE: https://www.amazon.com/Dictionary-Health-Insurance-Managed-Care/dp/0826149944/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1275315485&sr=1-4

THANK YOU

***

Filed under: Book Reviews, Glossary Terms, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Managed Care | Tagged: David Edward Marcinko, dictionary of health insurance and managed care, health insurance glossary, insurance glossary, managed care dictionary | Leave a comment »

Understanding the Tele-Medicine Paradox in Healthcare

Posted on October 17, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

THE TELE-MEDICINE PARADOX

Classic Definition: Refers specifically to the treatment of various medical conditions without seeing the patient in person. Healthcare providers may use electronic and internet platforms like live video, audio, PCs, tablets, or instant messaging to address a patient’s concerns and diagnose their condition remotely.

Modern Circumstance: This may include giving medical advice, walking them through at-home exercises, or recommending them to a local provider or facility. Even more exciting is the emergence of telemedicine apps which give patients access to care right from their phones or computer screens.

Historical Digital Health and Tele-Medicine?

Paradox Examples: Treating certain conditions remotely can be challenging. Tele-medicine is often used to treat common illnesses, manage chronic conditions, or provide specialist services. If a patient is dealing with an emergent or serious condition, the remote provider suggests they seek in-person medical care.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, iMBA, Inc., Information Technology, Marcinko Associates, Research & Development, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: AI, Artificial Intelligence Medicine, david marcinko, health, health care, healthcare, medicine, mental health, paradox, paradoxical, tele-medicine, tele-medicine paradox, wellness | Leave a comment »

VALUE BASED MEDICAL CARE: A Paradigm Shift in Healthcare

Posted on October 8, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By A. I.

***

***

Value-Based Medical Care: A Paradigm Shift in Healthcare

In recent years, the healthcare industry has undergone a transformative shift from volume-driven services to outcome-focused care. This evolution is embodied in the concept of value-based medical care, a model that emphasizes delivering high-quality healthcare while controlling costs and improving patient outcomes. Unlike traditional fee-for-service systems, which reward providers for the quantity of services rendered, value-based care aligns incentives with the value of care provided—measured by patient health outcomes relative to the cost of achieving them.

Core Principles of Value-Based Care

At its heart, value-based medical care is built on several foundational principles:

Patient-Centeredness: Care is tailored to individual needs, preferences, and values, promoting shared decision-making and holistic treatment.
Quality Over Quantity: Providers are rewarded for improving health outcomes, reducing hospital readmissions, and preventing disease rather than performing more procedures.
Integrated Care Delivery: Coordination among healthcare professionals ensures seamless transitions between services, reducing fragmentation and duplication.
Data-Driven Accountability: Performance metrics and health analytics guide clinical decisions and track progress toward better outcomes.
Cost Efficiency: By focusing on prevention and effective management of chronic conditions, value-based care aims to reduce unnecessary spending.

Benefits for Patients and Providers

For patients, value-based care offers a more personalized and proactive approach to health. It encourages preventive screenings, chronic disease management, and wellness programs that lead to longer, healthier lives. Providers benefit from shared savings programs, performance bonuses, and stronger relationships with their patients. Moreover, healthcare systems can allocate resources more effectively, reducing waste and improving overall population health.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Managed Care | Tagged: Accountability in Health Care, ACO, Health Insurance, health value, Managed Care, value based care, VBC | Leave a comment »

GAO RREPORT: Rising Physician Consolidation Increases Prices

Posted on October 5, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

On September 22, 2025, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report estimating “the Extent and Effects of Physician Consolidation.” The GAO, the non-partisan audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress, undertook the analysis of physician consolidation in response to lawmakers’ request.

This Health Capital Topics article reviews the GAO report and stakeholder reactions. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Refer, Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Experts Invited, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy | Tagged: congress, GAO, GAO report, Government Accountability Office, Health Capital Consultants, Physician Consolidation | Leave a comment »

SHUTDOWN: Healthcare Policy Disputes Threaten Government Shutdown: SHUTDOWN

Posted on October 1, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

BREAKING NEWS!

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SHUTS DOWN

***

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

With hours to go until the midnight deadline on September 30th, 2025 to fund the government, lawmakers appear deadlocked over whether certain healthcare provisions should be included in the temporary funding bill.

Should this deadlock continue, the federal government will shut down beginning today October 1st and remain shut down until that deadlock is resolved.

This Health Capital Topics article provides an update on the developing saga. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED!

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Events-Planner, Experts Invited, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance | Tagged: Government Shutdown, Health Capital Consultants LLC, healthcare policy, Jessica Bailey-Wheaton, shutdown, TODD A. ZIGRANG | Leave a comment »

PARADOX : Government Health Information is Trusted?

Posted on September 27, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Staff Reporters

***

***

A paradox is a statement that appears at first to be contradictory, but upon reflection then makes sense. This literary device is commonly used to engage a reader to discover an underlying logic in a seemingly self-contradictory statement or phrase. As a result, paradox allows readers to understand concepts in a different and even non-traditional

***

GOVERNMENT HEALTH INFORMATION IS TRUSTED?

Classic Definition: Despite the PP-ACA, there is ambivalence about the role of the US Government as a source of quality healthcare information.

Modern Circumstance: Of brands presented to respondents in a Consumer Reports (50 percent), and AARP (37 percent) survey, they outpolled the “US Government Healthcare Quality Reporting Website” (36 percent) and Medicare Website (32 percent).

Paradox Example: The focus groups expressed “mixed reactions and raised doubts about government involvement in quality ratings information. At least one participant in each group expressed skepticism about trusting ‘the government’ to compile information.”

Younger consumers especially questioned the relevance of Medicare measures to the non-elderly population. Yet participants gravitated to “.gov” websites over “.org” websites as a more authoritative source.

CITE: Williams, Jason: Health Affairs, December 28, 2016

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, CMP Program, Ethics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Retirement and Benefits | Tagged: ACA, AHRQ, CDC, CMP, CMS, Consumer Reports, FDA, goverrnment healthcare, Health information, HHS, HIT, HRSA, Medicaid, medicare, NIH, PP-ACA | Leave a comment »

Essential Health Dictionary Series for Professionals

Posted on September 25, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

*******

HEALTH DICTIONARY SERIES

VISIT: https://healthdictionaryseries.wordpress.com/

By Ann Miller RN MHA

[An Internet WIKI CROWD-SOURCED Curation Project]*

To keep up with the ever-changing healthcare industrial complex, we must learn new definitions and re-learn old terminology in order to correctly apply it to practice. By aggregating the most up-to-date abbreviations, acronyms, definitions and terms, the Health Dictionary Series offers a wealth of information to help understand the ever-changing terms-of-art in healthcare today.

Each 10,000 item handbook is essential for doctors, nurses, benefits managers and insurance agents, CPAs, and administrators; as well as graduate and under graduate students and professors. Our goal to for each dictionary to be designated as a Doody’s Core Title.

Dictionary of Health Insurance and Managed Care

With more than 8,000 definitions, 4,000 abbreviations and acronyms, and a 3,000 item oeuvre of resources, readings, and nomenclature derivatives, this dictionary covers the Medicare, managed care and Medicaid, private insurance, Veteran’s Administration and PP-ACA language of the entire health and long-term care insurance sector.

Dictionary of Health Economics and Finance

Health economics and finance is an integral component of the health care industrial complex. Its language is a diverse and broad-based concept covering many other industries: accounting, mathematics, the actuarial sciences, stochastics and statistics, salary reimbursements, physician payments, compensation and forecasting are all commingled arenas.

Dictionary of Health Information Technology Security

There is a myth that all healthcare stakeholders understand the meaning of information technology jargon. In truth, the vernacular of contemporary systems is unique, and often misused or misunderstood. Moreover, emerging Heath Information Technology (HIT) thru the HITECG initiatives; in the guise of terms, definitions, acronyms, abbreviations and standards; often puts the non-expert in a position of maximum uncertainty and minimum productivity.

*NOTE: A wiki website allows users to add or update content using their browser thru a hosted server created by the collaborative effort of site visitors. The Hawaiian term “wiki wiki” means “super fast.”

****

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Information Technology, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: health dictionary series, Health Economics, health finance, Health I.T., Health Insurance, HIT, Marcinko | Leave a comment »

Understanding Different Medical Degrees: MD, DO, and DPM

Posted on September 25, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Doctor of Medicine

Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine

Doctor of Podiatric Medicine

By Staff Reporters and APMA

***

***

APMA INFOGRAPHIC: https://www.apma.org/apmamain/document-server/?cfp=/apmamain/assets/file/public/about/physician-education-comparison-fact-sheet.pdf

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Experts Invited, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Op-Editorials | Tagged: APMA, DO, do education, doctor education, DPM, dpm education, MD, md education, medical education osteopathic education, osteopath, osteopathic education, physician, podiatrist, podiatry | Leave a comment »

Why Many Doctors Struggle Financially: 5 Key Reasons

Posted on September 23, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Despite their high salaries, not all doctors are wealthy, and some live paycheck to paycheck. Here are 5 reasons why many doctors today are broke, according to https://medschoolinsiders.com

1 | Believing They Are Universally Smart

The first reason so many doctors are broke is that many doctors believe they are universally smart. While most doctors have deep specialized knowledge, there’s a big difference between being smart in your profession and being smart with money. A physician’s schooling is quite thorough when it comes to the human body, but med school doesn’t include a prerequisite class on how to handle finances.

MORE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2022/11/18/what-is-the-dunning-kruger-effect/

Graduating medical school is a major feat and certainly demonstrates superior work ethic and cognitive abilities. But many new doctors believe these accomplishments transcend all aspects of life. If you’re smart enough to earn an MD, you’re certainly smart enough to handle your finances, but only once you properly and intentionally educate yourself.

The truth is doctors, especially traditional graduates, haven’t had an opportunity to manage large sums of money until they become fully trained attending physicians and start pulling in low to mid six figures in income. Prior to that, there was very little of it to manage.

Far too many aspiring doctors, and students in general, don’t take the time to learn financial basics, in part because it’s uncomfortable and seems like something they can figure out “later”, whenever that may be. Their poor spending habits and lack of investment knowledge carry over into their careers, causing many to make irresponsible decisions.

MORE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/07/17/doctors-and-lawyers-often-arent-millionaires/

2 | Overspending Too Soon

The second factor is overspending too soon, and this comes up at two points in training.

First, it’s natural to want to start spending more as soon as you get into residency and start making a little more money. After all, you’ve been a broke student for 8 or more years, and now you’re finally making a reasonable and reliable wage. But that’s where young doctors get into trouble. Residency pays, but not nearly as much as you will be making once you become an attending physician. The average resident makes about $60K a year, and if you begin spending all of that money right away, thinking you’ll handle your loans once you become an attending, you delay paying off your medical school debt, which means the compounding effect through your student loan interest rate works against you.

Now that $250,000 in student loans has ballooned to over $350,000 by the time you finish residency. The compounding effect, which can be one of your greatest allies in your financial life, becomes an equally powerful enemy when working against you through debt. But of course, pinching pennies is easier said than done, especially when you’re in residency and are surrounded by peers in different professions. They’ve been earning good money much longer than you have, and they can afford more luxurious lifestyles.

They may not be worried about indulging in fine dining or how much a hotel costs when traveling. Students in college and medical school are often confident they will resist the temptations, but the desire to keep up with your friends and family can be difficult to ignore, which causes many to overspend before they technically have the money to do so.

The same is true of attending physicians. As soon as those six-figure salaries come rolling in, many physicians go overboard with spending, trying to make up for lost time and to treat yourself.

Now, we are not suggesting you shouldn’t reward yourself for completing residency, but that reward shouldn’t be a Lamborghini. It’s best to continue living like a resident in your first few years after becoming an attending to pay off loans, put a down payment on a home, and get your financial foundation built before loosening the purse strings.

3 | Decreasing Salaries

Third, doctors continue to make less money than they did before. And this includes nearly all 44 medical specialties. For example, while physician compensation technically rose from $343k to $391k between 2017 and 2022, this rise does not keep up with inflation. The real average compensation in 2022 was less than $325k—a $20k decrease in purchasing power in only six years.

For doctors who are already spending to the limits of their salaries with huge mortgages, car payments, business costs, and other luxuries, a decreased salary can have a huge impact. You might be able to cut back by going on fewer vacations or eating out less frequently, but many accrued costs are locked in, such as a mortgage payment, car loan, or leased rental space for your practice.

4 | Increasing Costs of Private Practice

In the past, running a private practice was much simpler, but recent stricter guidelines and regulations have made it difficult for solo practices to keep up. While regulations like the Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act, or HIPAA, and mandatory Electronic Medical Records, or EMRs, are necessary to protect patients, they make costs higher for physicians who run their own private practice. These physicians need to spend their own money to set up and maintain EMRs as well as invest in security to ensure patient data is protected.

With the steep rise of inflation we’ve seen over the past couple of years, everything is more expensive, which means costs, such as business space, equipment, and even office supplies, have gone up for private practice physicians while salaries have not. 2013 to 2020 saw an annual inflation rate of anywhere from 0.7% to 2.3%. This skyrocketed to an annual inflation rate of 7.0% in 2021 and another 6.5% in 2022. In fact, the cost of running a private practice has increased by almost 40% between 2001 and 2021.

These increased costs are exacerbated by another problem plaguing private practices; decreased reimbursement. While costs increased by almost 40%, Medicare reimbursement only increased by 11%. When doctors see patients who are insured, the insurance companies pay the physicians for their time. For Medicare, the new proposed rules for 2023 would cut reimbursement by around 5%. When adjusting for inflation, Medicare reimbursement decreased by 20% in the last 20 years.

These costs add up, making it extremely difficult for physicians to thrive financially while running a private practice.

5 | Tuition Debt

Lastly, we can’t talk about a doctor’s finances without mentioning the exorbitant debt so many graduating physicians are left with. It won’t shock you to hear that med school is expensive. Extremely expensive. The average cost of tuition for a single year is nearly $60k, with significant variance from school to school, and that’s before accounting for living expenses.

In-state applicants pay less than out-of-state applicants, and students at private schools typically pay more than students at public medical schools. The astronomical costs mean the vast majority of students can’t pay for medical school out of their own pockets. And unless your family is part of the 1%, even with your parents footing the bill, it’s difficult to cover tuition, let alone rent, groceries, transportation, tech, social activities, exam fees, and application costs.

The average total student debt after college and med school is over $250k. But keep in mind that’s the average, which includes 27% of students who graduate with no debt at all. This means the vast majority of students leave medical school owing much more than $250k.

For some perspective, in 1978, the average debt for graduating MDs was $13,500, which, when adjusted for inflation, is a little over $60,000. There are multiple ways to eventually repay these loans, but time and discipline are essential to ensure this money is paid off as quickly as possible.

MORE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/12/03/12-investing-mistakes-of-physicians/

THE FINANCIAL FIX

According to financial advisor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MEd MBA CMP™; consider the following:

Place a portion of your salary (15-20% or more) into a savings account, and another portion (10-20% or more) into wise investments [stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and/or ETFs].

Pay off your bills each month, and then use leftover spending money to purchase fun things like vacations and fancy dinners, within your means. Shop sales, buy used clothes, and use credit card points for travel.

Hire an excellent tax professional and meet with an investment advisor once or twice a year about your investment status and strategy. http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, Ask a Doctor, Career Development, CMP Program, economics, Experts Invited, finance, Financial Planning, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Taxation | Tagged: broke physicians, CMP, DDS, DO, doctor, doctor debt, DPM, EMRs, health, healthcare, HIPAA, Marcinko, MD, medical school, medical school debt, medicine, physician debt, physicians | Leave a comment »

CAPITATION REIMBURSEMENT: A Historical Economic Review

Posted on September 15, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

***

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

DEFINITION

Capitation is a type of healthcare payment system in which a physician or hospital is paid a fixed amount of money per patient for a prescribed period by an insurer or physician association. The cost is based on the expected healthcare utilization costs for a group of patients for that year.

With capitation, the physician—otherwise known as the primary care physician— is paid a set amount for each enrolled patient whether a patient seeks care or not. The PCP is usually contracted with an HMO whose role it is to recruit patients.

ACOs: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/12/01/record-breaking-savings-for-acos-in-2023/

***

CAPITATION REIMBURSEMENT HISTORY

According to Richard Eskow, CEO of Health Knowledge Systems of Los Angeles, capitated medical reimbursement has been used in one form or another, in every attempt at healthcare reform since the Norman Conquest. Some even say an earlier variant existed in ancient China [personal communication].

Initially, when Henry I assumed the throne of the newly combined kingdoms of England and Normandy, he initiated a sweeping set of healthcare reforms. Historical documents, though muddled, indicate that soon thereafter at least one “physician,” John of Essex, received a flat payment honorarium of one penny per day for his efforts. Historian Edward J. Kealey opined that sum was roughly equal to that paid to a foot-soldier or a blind person. Clearer historical evidence suggests that American doctors in the mid-19th century were receiving capitation-like payments. No less an authoritative figure than Mark Twain, in fact, is on record as saying that during his boyhood in Hannibal, MO his parents paid the local doctor $25/year for taking care of the entire family regardless of their state of health.

Later, Sidney Garfield MD [1905-1984] is noted as one of the great under-appreciated geniuses of 20th century American medicine stood in the shadow cast by his more celebrated partner, Henry J. Kaiser. Garfield was not the first physician to embrace the notion of prepayment capitation, nor was he the first to understand that physicians working together in multi-specialty groups could, through collaboration and continuity of care, outperform their solo practice colleagues in almost every measure of quality and efficiency. The Mayo brothers, of course, had prior claim to that distinction. What Garfield did, was marry prepayment to group practice, providing aligned financial incentives across every physician and specialty in his medical group, as well as a culture of group accountability for the care of every member of the affiliated health plan. He called it “the new economics of medicine,” and at its heart was a fundamentally new paradigm of care that emphasized – prevention before treatment – and health before sickness. Under his model: the fewer the sick – the greater the remuneration. And: the less serious the illness, the better off the patient and the doctors.

VBC: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2018/12/07/the-state-of-value-based-care-vbc/

***

Such ideas were heresy to the reigning fee-for-service, solo practice, ideologues of the mainstream medical establishment of the 1940s and ‘50s, of course. Throughout the period, Garfield and his group physicians were routinely castigated by leaders of the AMA and county medical associations as socialistic and unethical. The local medical associations in Garfield’s expanding service areas – the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Portland, Oregon – blocked group practice physicians from association membership, effectively shutting them out of local hospitals, denying them patient referrals or specialty society accreditation. Twice in the 1940s, formal medical association charges were brought against Garfield personally, at one time temporarily succeeding in suspending his license to practice medicine.

Of course, capitation payments made a comeback in the first cost-cutting managed care era of the 1980-90s because fee-for-service medicine created perverse incentives for physicians by paying more for treating illnesses and injuries than it does for preventing them — or even for diagnosing them early and reducing the need for intensive treatment later. Nevertheless, the modern managed care industry’s experience with capitation wasn’t initially a good one. The 1980-90s saw a number of HMOs attempt to put independent physicians, especially primary care doctors, into a capitation reimbursement model. The result was often negative for patients, who found that their doctors were far less willing to see them — and saw them for briefer visits — when they were receiving no additional income for their effort. Attempts were also made to aggregate various types of health providers — including hospitals and physicians in multiple specialties — into “capitation groups” that were collectively responsible for delivering care to a defined patient group. These included healthcare facilities and medical providers of all types: physicians, osteopaths, podiatrists, dentists, optometrists, pharmacies, physical therapists, hospitals and skilled nursing homes, etc.

However, the healthcare industry isn’t collective by nature, and these efforts tended to be too complicated to succeed. One lesson that these experiments taught is that provider behavior is difficult to change unless the relationship between that behavior and its consequences is fairly direct and easy to understand.

MORE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/capitation-actuarial-medical-econometrics.pdf

Today, the concept of prepayment and medical capitation is to uncouple compensation from the actual number of patients seen, or treatments and interventions performed. This is akin to a fixed price restaurant menu, as opposed to an àla carte eatery.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Career Development, CMP Program, curated experts,, economics, Ethics, Experts Invited, finance, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: AMA, capitation, capitation economics, CMP, david marcinko, DDS, DMD, DO, doctor compensation, DPM, exchange-server, Health Economics, Health Insurance, HMO, Managed Care, MD, PCP, physician compensation, powershell, primary care provider, Richard Eskow, RN, Sidney Garfield, system-center | Leave a comment »

PHYSICIAN BANKRUPTCY: Six Total Types to Know!

Posted on September 7, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

According to Medical Economics, there were 10 clinic and physician practices filing bankruptcy in 2024, making it the highest level of the last six years, according to a new analysis of cases with liabilities of at least $10 million.

Meanwhile, the Steward Health Care System bankruptcy, which was based in Massachusetts but making headlines across the nation, has become “the largest hospital sector bankruptcy by far in the last 30 years,” according to a new analysis by Gibbins Advisors, based in Nashville, Tennessee.

Health care bankruptcy filings totaled 57 last year, down from 79 in 2023, said “Healthcare Restructuring: Trends and Outlook.” The report analyzed Chapter 11 health care bankruptcy cases with liabilities of at least $10 million, since 2019.

Last year’s total was down 28% from 2023’s peak, but greater than the 2019 to 2022 average of 42 filings a year, the report said.

BROKE DOCTORS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/08/02/doctors-going-broke-and-living-paycheck-to-paycheck/

***

Bankruptcy, often considered a last financial resort, is a legal process that can help alleviate outstanding debts for individuals and businesses. Reasons to file for bankruptcy can include divorce, job loss, exorbitant medical bills or credit card debt.

There are several types of bankruptcy — six, as a matter of fact. The two most common types of bankruptcy for individuals are Chapter 7 and Chapter 13.

But there are four other types as well: Chapter 9, Chapter 11, Chapter 12 and Chapter 15. And, the type of bankruptcy filed depends on the situation.

Regardless of which type, the process is typically the same: You’ll usually retain an attorney and make your case before a judge, who will then erase some debts or set up a repayment plan.

Also note that an eligibility requirement — for all bankruptcy chapters — is that you must undergo credit counseling within the 180 days before filing.

DOCTORS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/07/17/doctors-and-lawyers-often-arent-millionaires/

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Subscribe and Refer

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", "Doctors Only", Career Development, CMP Program, economics, Experts Invited, finance, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Insurance Matters | Tagged: assets, bankruptcy, california, Chapter 11, Chapter 7, CMP, credit counseling, DMD, DPM, Gibbins Advisors, liabilities, MD, Media, medical, Medical Exonomics, Physician bankruptcy, software, Steward Health Care | Leave a comment »

New HHS-CMS Committee Announced

Posted on September 5, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

U.S. Department for Health & Human Services & Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

On August 21, 2025, the U.S. Department for Health & Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the formation of a new Healthcare Advisory Committee.

The Committee is expected to be comprised of a group of experts who will make strategic recommendations to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz.

This Health Capital Topics article discusses this announcement and potential implications on the healthcare industry. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Subscribe, Refer and Like

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Experts Invited, Health Economics, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Op-Editorials | Tagged: CMS, Health Capital Consultants, Healthcare Advisory Committee., HHS, Jessica Bailey-Wheaton, Mehmet Oz, Robert Kennedy, TODD A. ZIGRANG | Leave a comment »

CMS: Releases 2026 IPPS Final Rule

Posted on September 3, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

***

***

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

On July 31, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its finalized payment and policy updates for the Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and the Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) Prospective Payment System (PPS) for fiscal year (FY) 2026.

The final rule authorized Medicare inpatient reimbursement increases for 2026 and moved forward with improvements to quality measurement, and provided more information on a new value-based payment model.

This Health Capital Topics article will discuss the IPPS final rule and stakeholder reactions. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Subscribe, Like and Refer

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Ethics, Experts Invited, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance | Tagged: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CMS, Health Capital Consultants LLC, IPPS, Jessica Bailey-Wheaton, Long-Term Care Hospital, LTCH, Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System, TODD A. ZIGRANG | Leave a comment »

MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION: Fraudulent Faux (“Mirror”) Schemes

Posted on August 27, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

***

***

Physician Beware Fraudulent Faux (“Mirror”) MCO Schemes

A silent, non-directed, ghost, blind, faux, or “mirror” PPO, HMO, or other provider model is not really a formalized managed care organization [MCO] at all. Rather, it was simply an intermediary attempt, and Ponzi-like scheme, to negotiate practitioner fees downward, by promising a higher volume of patients in exchange for the discount.

Of course, the intermediary [discount-broker] then resells the packaged contract product to any willing insurance company, HMO, PPO or other payer, thereby pocketing the difference as a nice profit. Sometime, these virtual organizations are just indemnity companies in disguise.

CLEVELAND CLINIC: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/05/17/cleveland-clinic-controversial-new-health-insurance-co-payment-policy/

***

NOTE: The term indemnity insurance refers to an insurance policy that compensates an insured party for certain unexpected damages or losses up to a certain limit—usually the amount of the loss itself. Insurance companies provide coverage in exchange for premiums paid by the insured parties.

These policies are commonly designed to protect professionals and business owners when they are found to be at fault for a specific event such as misjudgment or malpractice. They generally take the form of a letter o indemnity.

***

As part of a silent PPO scheme, insurers try to pass off the discount as legitimate on Explanation of Benefit [EOB] forms. Physicians should not fall for this ploy, since pricing pressure will be forced even lower in the next round of “real” PPO negotiations!

Medical providers should also be on guard for silent HMOs, MCOs and any other silent insurance variation, since these virtual organizations do not exist, except as exploitable arbitrage situations for the middleman.

PRE-PAID PLANS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/04/17/health-insurance-pre-paid-plans/

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", CMP Program, Ethics, finance, Glossary Terms, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance | Tagged: Cleveland Clinic, david marcinko, DPM, health, Health Insurance, HMO, indemnity insurance, INSURANCE COMPANIES, MCO, MCO schemes, MD, politics, PPO, pre-paid insurance | Leave a comment »

HEALTH 3.0: Developing New Physician Leadership Skills

Posted on August 22, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Medicine today is vastly different than a generation ago, and all health care professionals need new skills to be successful and reduce the emerging risks outlined in this textbook, as well as the “unknown-unknowns” elsewhere. Traditionally, the physician was viewed as the “captain of the ship”. Today, their role may be more akin to a ship’s navigator, using clinical, teaching skills and knowledge to chart the patient’s course through a confusing morass of insurance requirements, fees, choices, rules and regulations to achieve the best attainable clinical outcomes.

This new leadership paradigm includes many classic business school principles, now modified to fit the decade long PP-ACA, the era of health reform, and modern technical connectivity and EMRs.

LEADERSHIP: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2023/04/14/what-is-a-leadership-and-can-it-be-defined/

Thus, the physician must be a subtle guide on the side; not bombastic sage on the stage. These, newer health 3.0 leadership philosophies might include:

•Negotiation – working to optimize appropriate treatment plans; ie., quality of life versus quantity of life,
•Team play – working in concert with other allied healthcare professionals to coordinate care delivery ,ithin a clinically appropriate and cost-effective framework;
•Working within the limits of competence – avoiding the pitfalls of the medical generalist versus the specialist that may restrict access to treatment, medications, physicians and facilities by clearly acknowledging when a higher degree of service is needed on behalf of the patient – all while embracing holistic primary care;
•Respecting different cultures and values – inherent in the support of the medical Principle of Autonomy is the acceptance of values that may differ from one’s own. As the US becomes more culturally hetero geneous, medical providers are called upon to work within, and respect, the socio-cultural and/or spiritual framework of patients, students and their families;
•Seeking clarity on what constitutes marginal care – within a system of finite resources; providers are called upon to openly communicate with patients regarding access to marginal medical information and/or treatments.
•Supporting evidence-based practice – healthcare providers, should utilize outcomes data to reduce variation in treatments to achieve higher efficiencies and improved care delivery thru evidence based medicine [EBM];
•Fostering transparency and openness in communications – healthcare professionals should be willing, and prepared, to discuss all aspects of care, especially when discussing end-of-life issues or when problems arise;
•Exercising decision-making flexibility – treatment algorithms, templates and clinical pathways are useful tools when used within their scope; but providers must have the authority to adjust the plan if circumstances warrant.

HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/05/01/healthcare-leadership-on-the-brink-executives-eyeing-the-exits/

Assessment

Becoming skilled in the art of listening and interpreting — In her ground-breaking book, Narrative Ethics: Honoring the Stories of Illness, Rita Charon, MD PhD, a professor at Columbia University, writes of the extraordinary value of using the patient’s personal story in the treatment plan. She notes that, “medicine practiced with narrative competence will more ably recognize patients and diseases; convey knowledge and regard, join humbly with colleagues, and accompany patients and their families through ordeals of illness.” In many ways, attention to narrative returns medicine full circle to the compassionate and caring foundations of the patient-physician relationship.

These thoughts represent only a handful of examples to illustrate the myriad of new skills that tomorrows’ healthcare professionals must master in order to meet their timeless professional obligations of compassionate care and contemporary treatment effectiveness; all within the context modern risk management principles.

BRAND MANAGEMENT: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/07/07/brand-management-7-approaches-for-doctors-and-financial-advisors/

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Career Development, Health Law & Policy, Managed Care, Management, Marcinko Associates, mental health, Op-Editorials, Practice Management | Tagged: AI, Columbia University, david marcinko, EBM, EHRs, EMRs, health, healthcare, leadership skills, Management, medicine, mental health, physicians, PP-ACA, Rita Charon MD, Technology | Leave a comment »

OB-GYN V. Obstetrician V. Gynecologist V. Mid-Wife V. Doula

Posted on August 15, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

DEFINITIONS

A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

OB-GYN

An obstetrician-gynecologist, or OB-GYN, has expertise in female reproductive health, pregnancy, and childbirth. Some OB-GYNs offer a wide range of general health services similar to a primary care doctor. Others focus on the medical care of the female reproductive system. OB-GYNs also provide routine medical services and preventive screenings. This type of doctor has studied obstetrics and gynecology. The term “OB-GYN” can refer to the doctor, an obstetrician-gynecologist, or to the sciences that the doctor specializes in, which are obstetrics and gynecology.

Obstetrician

Obstetrics is the branch of medicine related to medical and surgical care before, during, and after a woman gives birth. Obstetrics focuses on caring for and maintaining a woman’s overall health during maternity. This includes:

pregnancy
labor
childbirth
the postpartum period

OB-GYNs can conduct office visits, perform surgery, and assist with labor and delivery. Some OB-GYNs provide services through a solo or private practice. Others do so as part of a larger medical group or hospital.

***

Gynecologist

Gynecology is the branch of medicine that focuses on women’s bodies and their reproductive health. It includes the diagnosis, treatment, and care of women’s reproductive system. This includes the:

vagina
uterus
ovaries
fallopian tubes

This branch of medicine also includes screening for and treating issues associated with women’s breasts. Gynecology is the overarching field of women’s health from puberty through adulthood. It represents most of the reproductive care received during a lifetime. If pregnant, one goes to an obstetrician.

Mid-Wife

Midwives are registered nurses who specialize in midwifery. As such, they’re trained healthcare providers who can oversee low-risk pregnancies, labor, and birth. They can provide other obstetric and gynecological services too. They can do exams and help with basic gynecological concerns like sexually transmitted infections, urinary tract infections, or yeast infections. They help support during labor and in the postpartum period with breastfeeding and birth control.

Doula

Doulas aren’t clinical professionals and can’t give medical advice. They can’t prescribe medicines, and they can’t deliver a baby. But they can offer physical and emotional support during labor—and sometimes during and after pregnancy. Doulas can help with breathing techniques, positional changes, and relaxation strategies during labor. Studies show doulas are associated with fewer C-sections and more vaginal births.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Career Development, CMP Program, Ethics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance | Tagged: births, child birth, CMP, DO, doula, Gynecologist, gyno, health, MD, mid-wife, motherhood, ob-gyn, Obstetrician, physician, pregnancy, RN | Leave a comment »

Ophthalmologist V. Optometrist V. Optician V. Ocularist

Posted on August 11, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

Difference-between-Optometrist-and-Ophthalmologist

***

An ophthalmologist is a physician [MD, DO] who undergoes sub-specialty training in medical and surgical eye care. Following a medical degree, a doctor specializing in ophthalmology must pursue additional postgraduate residency training specific to that field. In the United States, following graduation from medical school, one must complete a four-year residency in ophthalmology to become an ophthalmologist. Following residency, additional specialty training (or fellowship) may be sought in a particular aspect of eye pathology.

Ophthalmologists prescribe medications to treat ailments, such as eye diseases, implement laser therapy, and perform surgery when needed. Ophthalmologists provide both primary and specialty eye care—medical and surgical. Most ophthalmologists participate in academic research on eye diseases at some point in their training and many include research as part of their career. Ophthalmology has always been at the forefront of medical research with a long history of advancement and innovation in eye care.

Optometrist

Optometrists focus on regular vision care and primary health care for the eye. After college, they spend 4 years in a professional program and get a doctor of optometry degree. But they don’t go to medical school. Some optometrists get additional clinical training or complete a specialty fellowship after optometry school. They:

Perform eye exams and vision tests
Prescribe and fit eyeglasses and contact lenses
Monitor eye conditions related to diseases like diabetes
Manage and treat conditions like dry eye and glaucoma
Provide low-vision aids and vision therapy

There are specialties among optometrists. They include:

Pediatric optometry. These providers work with babies, toddlers, and children, using special techniques to test their vision.

Neuro-optometry. If you have vision problems that result from a brain injury, this is the type of optometrist you might visit.

Low-vision optometry. If you have low vision—that means you can’t see well enough to perform your daily activities and your sight can’t be corrected by glasses or contact lenses, medicine, or surgery—low-vision optometrists offer devices and strategies that can improve your quality of life.

***

Optician

An optician is an eye care specialist who helps you choose the right eyeglasses, contact lenses or other vision correction devices. They can’t diagnose or treat conditions that affect your eyes or vision. They’ll work with you to get the right corrective lenses after your optometrist or ophthalmologist gives you a prescription.

Ocularist

An ocularist is an eye care specialist who provides care for people needing prosthetic eyes due to injury, infection or congenital disease (present at birth). Losing or damaging an eye can be a traumatic experience, and the need for a prosthetic can be overwhelming. Ocularists offer long-term care. They collaborate with your healthcare team to create or restore a more natural facial appearance with the goal of enhancing your health-related quality of life.

A former term for this medical branch is oculism.

***

***

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Career Development, CMP Program, Drugs and Pharma, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: CMP, DO, eye, eye doctor, MD, oculism, oculist, ophthalmologist, optician, optometrist, WebMD | Leave a comment »

DOJ-HHS FCA Working Group Revived

Posted on August 10, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

On July 2, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) announced during the American Health Law Association (AHLA) Annual Meeting that the agencies have reestablished a Working Group to “strengthen” their ongoing collaboration, specifically as relates to the False Claims Act (FCA).

This Health Capital Topics article discusses the Working Group’s priorities and the implications for providers. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Experts Invited, Health Economics, Health Law & Policy | Tagged: AHLA, American Health Law Association, Department of Justice, DOJ, false claims act, FCA, Health Capital Consultants LLC, HHS | Leave a comment »

PHARMACEUTICALS: Trump Tariff Plans

Posted on August 8, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Trump says pharma tariffs could be as high as 250%

The president revealed that he plans to formally announce tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry “within the next week or so” in an attempt to force drug manufacturing to the US, he told CNBC several days ago.

PBMs: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2019/01/18/on-pbms-pharmacy-benefits-management/

It would start with a “small” tariff, Trump said, before rising to 150% in a year to a year and a half, and eventually to 250%.

Pharma companies have argued that tariffs could drive up costs and threaten their ability to fund research for new medicines.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Ask a Doctor, CMP Program, Drugs and Pharma, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, iMBA, Inc., mental health | Tagged: AI, artificial intelligence, Big Pharma, certified medical planner, ChatGPT, CNBC, Donald Trump, drug prices, DRUG TARIFFS, Drugs, healthcare costs, medical costs, medicine, Morning Brew, openAI, PBMs, pharmaceutical industry, tariffs, Technology | Leave a comment »

HOSPITALS: Understanding Different Types

Posted on August 6, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

HOSPITAL TYPES DEFINED FOR MODERNITY

Acute Care Inpatient Hospital

An acute care inpatient hospital is a health care organization or “anchor hospital” in which a patient is treated for an acute (immediate and severe) episode of illness or the subsequent treatment of injuries related to an accident or trauma, or during recovery from surgery. Specialized personnel using complex and sophisticated technical equipment and materials usually render acute professional care in a hospital setting. Unlike chronic care, acute care is often necessary for only a short time. Measures of acute health care utilization are represented by three separate rates:

Rate of admissions per 1000 patients.
Average length of stay per admission.
Total days of care per 1000 patients.

***

***

Psychiatric Hospital

A psychiatric hospital (behavioral health, mental hospital, or asylum) specializes in the treatment of patients with mental illness or drug-related illness or dependencies. Psychiatric wards differ only in that they are a unit of a larger hospital.

Specialty Hospital

A specialty hospital is a type of health care organization that has a limited focus to provide treatment for only certain illnesses such as cardiac care, orthopedic or plastic surgery, elder care, radiology / oncology services, neurological care, or pain management cases. These organizations are often owned by doctors who refer patients to them. In recent years, single-specialty hospitals have emerged in various locations in the United States. Instead of offering a full range of inpatient services, these hospitals focus on providing services relating to a single medical specialty or cluster of specialties.

Long-Term Care Hospital

A long-term care hospital is an entity that provides assistance and patient care for the activities of daily living (ADLs), including reminders and standby help for those with physical, mental, or emotional problems. This includes physical disability or other medical problems for 3 months or more (90 days). The criteria of five ADLs may also be used to determine the need for help with the following: meal preparation, shopping, light housework, money management, and telephoning. Other important considerations include taking medications, doing laundry, and getting around
outside.

Rural Hospital

The parameters of a rural hospital are determined based on distance. A rural hospital is defined as a hospital serving a geographic area 10 or more miles from the nexus of a population center of 30,000 or more.

More specifically, a rural hospital means an entity characterized by one of the following:

Type A rural hospital—small and remote, has fewer than 50 beds, and is more than 30
miles from the nearest hospital
Type B rural hospital—small and rural, has fewer than 50 beds, and is 30 miles or less from
the nearest hospital
Type C rural hospital—considered rural and has 50 or more beds

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, CMP Program, Drugs and Pharma, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: activities daily living, acute care inpatient hospitals, ADLs, certified medical planner, David Edward Marcinko, different hospital types, hospital types, long term care hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, rural hospitals, social-justice, speciality hospitals, types of hospitals | Leave a comment »

PROPOSED: 2026 Physician Fee Schedule Payment Increases

Posted on July 31, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

***

On July 14, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its proposed Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for calendar year (CY) 2026.

In addition to the agency’s suggested increase to physician payments, the proposed rule also announces a new payment model and more tele-health flexibilities.

According to CMS, the “proposed rule is one of several proposed rules that reflect a broader Administration-wide strategy to create a health care system that results in better quality, efficiency, empowerment, and innovation for all Medicare beneficiaries.” (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, business, Drugs and Pharma, economics, Experts Invited, Funding Basics, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Managed Care, Taxation | Tagged: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CMS, Health Capital Consultants LLC, medicare, Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, MPFS, payments, teleHealth | Leave a comment »

Why [Too Many] Physician Colleagues Don’t Get Rich?

Posted on July 29, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Ask a Doctor, Career Development, Experts Invited, finance, Financial Planning, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: ACA, CFP, CMP, CMS, DDS, doctors, DPM, dumb doctors, dumb physicians, Dunning, financial advisors, HHS, Marcinko, MD, Paul Larson, physicians, poor physicians, PP-ACA, rich physicians, Thomas Stanley | Comments Off on Why [Too Many] Physician Colleagues Don’t Get Rich?

PODIATRIST: Types, Specialization and Salary

Posted on July 28, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

THE FOOT & ANKLE DOCTORS

By A.I.

***

***

Podiatry offers a promising career with a balanced mix of specialization and income. By understanding the factors that influence salaries—such as location, experience, and practice type—a doctor can strategically enhance his/er earning potential. Staying informed about healthcare policies and market trends is crucial for maximizing income.

With an aging population and advancements in technology, the demand for podiatrists is expected to grow, making it a rewarding field both professionally and financially. Investing in specialized training and adapting to policy changes will help doctors remain competitive and successful in the evolving healthcare landscape.

MORE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/12/03/12-investing-mistakes-of-physicians/

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a podiatrist?

A podiatrist is a healthcare professional specialized in diagnosing and treating conditions related to the feet and ankles. Their responsibilities include performing surgeries, prescribing orthotics, and providing preventive care.

MORE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/03/20/is-a-podiatrist-a-physician/

What education is required to become a podiatrist?

To become a podiatrist, one must complete a Doctor of Podiatric Medicine (DPM) degree, which typically takes four years after earning a bachelor’s degree. Following this, a residency program lasting 2-3 years is required for practical training.

What factors influence the salary of a podiatrist?

Geographic location, level of experience, specialization, and type of practice significantly affect a podiatrist’s salary. Areas with a higher cost of living or demand for services usually offer higher salaries.

How does the salary of a podiatrist compare to other medical professions?

Podiatrists generally earn more than general practitioners but less than specialty surgeons. This disparity is due to differences in training length, specialization, and practice complexity among these professions.

Can the salary of a podiatrist increase over time?

Yes, a podiatrist’s salary can increase with additional experience, further specialization, and strategic practice location choices. Continuing education and staying updated on healthcare policies can also enhance earning potential.

What impact do healthcare policies have on podiatrist salaries?

Healthcare policies, including changes in insurance reimbursement rates and government health initiatives, can affect podiatrist salaries. Adapting to these policy shifts is crucial for maximizing earning potential in the field.

What are the future trends in podiatry salaries?

Future trends suggest potential salary growth due to increasing demand from an aging population, technological advancements, and geographic disparities in healthcare access. Keeping informed about these trends can help podiatrists plan their careers strategically.

MORE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2011/09/22/is-the-mutual-fund-company-invesco-dis-respecting-podiatrists/

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like and Subscribe

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, hospitals, financial advisory firms, RIAs, or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, business, CMP Program, finance, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: ankle, ankles, broker-dealers, CMP, DDS, DO, doctor podiatric medicine, DPM, foot, foot ankle, foot doctor, health, Invesco, leg, Marcinko, podiatrist, RIAs | Leave a comment »

CMS Proposes Updates to the OPPS

Posted on July 26, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

On July 15, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the proposed rule for the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System for calendar year (CY) 2026.

Among other items, the agency proposes increasing payments to all outpatient providers, eliminating the Inpatient Only (IPO) List, and changing quality reporting programs.

This Health Capital Topics article reviews the proposed updates and changes to outpatient reimbursement. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, business, Drugs and Pharma, economics, Experts Invited, Health Economics, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Managed Care, Taxation | Tagged: ASC, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CMS, HCC, Health Capital Consultants LLC, Inpatient Only (IPO) List, IPO, OPPS, Outpatient Prospective Payment System, Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System | Leave a comment »

Subscribe MEDICAL EXECUTIVE-POST?

Member Statistics

ME-P Information & Content Channels

Ann Miller RN MHA [Managing Editor]

CERTIFIED MEDICAL PLANNER® program

Most Recent ME-Ps

PodiatryPrep.org

ME-P Free Advertising Consultation

Medical & Surgical e-Consent Forms

iMBA Inc., OFFICES

ME-P Publishing

SEEKING INDUSTRY INFO PARTNERS?

Reader Comments, Quips, Opinions, News & Updates

Start-Up Advice for Businesses, DRs and Entrepreneurs

Up-Trending ME-Ps

Capitalism and Free Enterprise Advocacy

OIG Fraud Warnings

Redefining Access, Value and the Patient Experience

Share this:

A Transformative Approach to Healthcare Financing

Share this:

Subscribe to continue reading

Share this:

A Comprehensive Overview

1. Internal Medicine

2. Family Medicine

3. Pediatrics

4. Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN)

5. Surgery

6. Orthopedic Surgery

7. Cardiology

8. Neurology

9. Psychiatry

10. Dermatology

11. Ophthalmology

12. Otolaryngology (ENT)

13. Emergency Medicine

14. Anesthesiology

15. Radiology

16. Pathology

17. Oncology

18. Endocrinology

19. Gastroenterology

20. Nephrology

Conclusion

Share this:

An Examination of Its Causes and Consequences

Share this:

An Examination of Their Purpose and Impact

Share this:

Share this:

1. Kenneth Lay & Jeffrey Skilling (Enron)

2. Bernie Madoff (Madoff Investment Securities)

3. Andrew Fastow (Enron CFO)

4. Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos)

5. Allen Stanford (Stanford Financial Group)

6. Jordan Belfort (Stratton Oakmont)

7. Charles Ponzi (The Original Ponzi Scheme)

8. Martin Shkreli (Turing Pharmaceuticals)

9. Sam Bankman‑Fried (FTX)

10. Modern Imposter & Digital Scammers

Conclusion

Share this:

Share this:

Stress, Burnout, Divorce, and Practice Turmoil

The Nature of Stress in Podiatry

Burnout: A Silent Epidemic

Divorce and Personal Strain

Practice Turmoil: The Business of Healing

Addressing the Crisis

Conclusion

Share this:

Purpose, Scope and Impact

Share this:

***

MORAVEC’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HEALTHCARE PARADOX

Share this:

Historical and Monetary Significance

Inflation Hedge and Safe-Haven Asset

Diversification and Risk Management