ME-P SYNDICATIONS:
WSJ.com,
CNN.com,
Forbes.com,
WashingtonPost.com,
BusinessWeek.com,
USNews.com, Reuters.com,
TimeWarnerCable.com,
e-How.com,
News Alloy.com,
and Congress.org
BOARD CERTIFICATION EXAM STUDY GUIDES
Lower Extremity Trauma
[Click on Image to Enlarge]
The “Medical Executive-Post” is about connecting doctors, health care executives and modern consulting advisors. It’s about free-enterprise, business, practice, policy, personal financial planning and wealth building capitalism. We have an attitude that’s independent, outspoken, intelligent and so Next-Gen; often edgy, usually controversial. And, our consultants “got fly”, just like U. Read it! Write it! Post it! “Medical Executive-Post”. Call or email us for your FREE advertising and sales consultation TODAY [678.779.8597] Email: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
ePodiatryConsentForms.com
“Providing Management, Financial and Business Solutions for Modernity”
Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds.
THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: finance, Investing, personal-finance, stock market, stocks | Comments Off on MUTUAL FUNDS: Closed End
BASIC DEFINITIONS
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
A financial warrant is similar to an option, but it is typically issued directly by a company rather than traded on an exchange. Warrants allow holders to purchase shares of the issuing company at a fixed price, known as the exercise price, within a specified time frame. Unlike options, which are standardized and traded on secondary markets, warrants are often attached to bonds or preferred stock as a “sweetener” to make those securities more attractive to investors.
Companies issue warrants for several reasons:
Benefits:
Risks:
Financial warrants occupy a unique space between corporate finance and speculative investing. They serve as capital-raising tools for companies and leveraged opportunities for investors, but they also carry risks of dilution and expiration without value. Understanding their mechanics, types, and strategic uses is essential for anyone navigating modern financial markets.
In essence, warrants are a bridge between debt and equity, offering flexibility to issuers and optionality to investors. Their role in corporate finance highlights the innovative ways companies structure securities to balance risk, reward, and capital needs.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: finance, Investing, personal-finance, stock market, stocks | Leave a comment »
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: finance, Investing, investment, personal-finance, stocks | Comments Off on POSITION SIZING: How to Construct Portfolios That Protect You
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
In the realm of finance and investment, the pursuit of profit is inseparable from the presence of risk. Every investor, whether an individual or an institution, must grapple with the reality that higher returns often come with greater uncertainty. To evaluate investments effectively, it is not enough to look at raw returns alone. Instead, one must consider how much risk was undertaken to achieve those returns. This balance is captured by the concept of the risk-adjusted rate of return, a cornerstone of modern portfolio theory and investment analysis.
The risk-adjusted rate of return measures the profitability of an investment relative to the risk assumed. Unlike simple return calculations, which only show the percentage gain or loss, risk-adjusted metrics incorporate volatility and other forms of uncertainty. For example, two investments may both yield a 10% annual return, but if one is highly volatile and the other is stable, the stable investment is more attractive when viewed through a risk-adjusted lens. This approach ensures that investors are not misled by high returns that are achieved through excessive risk-taking.
Several tools have been developed to calculate risk-adjusted returns. The Sharpe Ratio is among the most widely used. It measures excess return per unit of risk, with risk defined as the standard deviation of returns. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates that an investment is delivering better returns for the level of risk taken. Another measure, the Treynor Ratio, evaluates returns relative to systematic risk, using beta as the risk measure. The Sortino Ratio refines the Sharpe Ratio by focusing only on downside volatility, thereby distinguishing between harmful risk and general fluctuations. Each of these metrics provides a different perspective, but all share the same goal: to assess whether the reward justifies the risk.
The importance of risk-adjusted returns extends beyond individual securities to entire portfolios. Portfolio managers use these metrics to compare strategies, evaluate asset allocations, and determine whether their investment approach aligns with client objectives. For instance, a hedge fund may report impressive raw returns, but if those returns are accompanied by extreme volatility, its risk-adjusted performance may be inferior to that of a conservative mutual fund. By incorporating risk-adjusted measures, investors can make more informed decisions and build portfolios that reflect their risk tolerance and long-term goals.
Risk-adjusted returns also play a vital role in distinguishing skill from luck in investment management. A manager who consistently delivers high risk-adjusted returns demonstrates genuine expertise in navigating markets. Conversely, a manager who achieves high raw returns through excessive risk-taking may simply be gambling with investor capital. This distinction is critical for institutions and individuals alike, as it ensures that performance evaluations are grounded in sustainability rather than short-term speculation.
Of course, risk-adjusted metrics are not without limitations. They often rely on historical data, which may not accurately predict future outcomes. Market conditions can change rapidly, and past volatility may not reflect future risks. Additionally, different metrics may yield conflicting results, complicating the decision-making process. Despite these challenges, risk-adjusted returns remain indispensable because they encourage investors to look beyond superficial gains and consider the broader context of risk management.
In conclusion, the risk-adjusted rate of return is a fundamental concept in investment analysis. By integrating both risk and reward into a single measure, it empowers investors to evaluate opportunities more effectively, compare diverse assets, and build resilient portfolios. While no metric is flawless, the emphasis on risk-adjusted performance ensures that investment decisions are not driven solely by the pursuit of high returns but by the pursuit of sustainable, well-balanced growth. In a financial landscape defined by uncertainty, the ability to measure success in terms of both profit and prudence is what ultimately separates wise investing from reckless speculation.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Interviews, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: david marcinko, finance, Investing, investment, Modern Portfolio Theory, MPT, personal-finance, Portfolio Management, portfolio theory, Sharpe Ratio, stocks, Treynor Ratio | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
BASIC DEFINITIONS
***
***
Money supply measures—M0, M1, M2, and M3—are essential tools used by economists and policymakers to assess liquidity, guide monetary policy, and understand economic health. Each measure reflects a different level of liquidity and plays a unique role in financial analysis.
The money supply refers to the total amount of monetary assets available in an economy at a specific time. It includes various forms of money, ranging from physical currency to more liquid financial instruments. To better understand and manage economic activity, central banks and economists categorize money into different measures based on liquidity: M0, M1, M2, and M3.
M0, also known as the monetary base or base money, includes all physical currency in circulation—coins and paper money—plus reserves held by commercial banks at the central bank. It represents the most liquid form of money and is directly controlled by the central bank through tools like open market operations and reserve requirements.
M1 builds on M0 by adding demand deposits (checking accounts) and other liquid deposits that can be quickly converted into cash. It includes:
M1 is a key indicator of immediate spending power in the economy. A rapid increase in M1 can signal rising consumer activity, while a decline may indicate tightening liquidity.
M2 expands further by including near-money assets—those that are not as liquid as M1 but can be converted into cash relatively easily. M2 includes:
M2 is widely used by economists and the Federal Reserve to gauge intermediate-term economic trends. It reflects both spending and saving behavior, making it a critical tool for forecasting inflation and guiding interest rate decisions.
M3, though no longer published by the Federal Reserve since 2006, includes M2 plus large time deposits, institutional money market funds, and other larger liquid assets. M3 provides a broader view of the money supply, especially useful for analyzing long-term investment trends and credit expansion. Some countries, like the UK and India, still track M3 for macroeconomic planning.
These measures are not just academic—they have real-world implications. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. saw a historic surge in M2 due to stimulus payments and quantitative easing. This expansion raised concerns about future inflation, which materialized in subsequent years. Monitoring money supply helps central banks adjust monetary policy to maintain price stability and support economic growth.
In conclusion, money supply measures offer a layered view of liquidity in the economy, from the most liquid (M0) to broader aggregates (M3).
Understanding these categories helps policymakers, investors, and businesses anticipate economic shifts, manage inflation, and make informed financial decisions.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: base money, bonds, CASH, david marcinko, demand deposits, economy, fed, finance, FOMC, Investing, large time deposits, liquidity, MMFs, monetary base, money supply, money supply liquidity, stock market, stocks | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
Risk arbitrage, often referred to as merger arbitrage, is a specialized investment strategy that seeks to exploit pricing inefficiencies arising during corporate mergers, acquisitions, or other restructuring events. Unlike traditional arbitrage, which involves risk-free profit opportunities from price discrepancies across markets, risk arbitrage carries inherent uncertainty because it depends on the successful completion of corporate transactions. Despite its name, it is not risk-free; rather, it is a calculated approach to profiting from the probability of deal closure.
At its core, risk arbitrage involves buying the stock of a company being acquired and, in some cases, shorting the stock of the acquiring company. For example, if Company A announces it will acquire Company B at $50 per share, but Company B’s stock trades at $47, arbitrageurs may purchase shares of Company B, betting that the deal will close and the stock will rise to the agreed acquisition price. The $3 difference represents the potential arbitrage profit. However, this spread exists precisely because of uncertainty: regulatory approval, financing challenges, shareholder resistance, or unforeseen market conditions could derail the transaction, leaving arbitrageurs exposed to losses.
The practice of risk arbitrage has a long history in Wall Street. It gained prominence in the mid-20th century, particularly during the wave of conglomerate mergers in the 1960s and leveraged buyouts in the 1980s. Hedge funds and specialized arbitrage desks at investment banks became key players, using sophisticated models to assess the likelihood of deal completion. Today, risk arbitrage remains a central strategy for event-driven funds, which focus on corporate actions as catalysts for investment opportunities.
One of the defining features of risk arbitrage is its reliance on probability analysis. Investors must evaluate not only the financial terms of the deal but also the legal, regulatory, and political environment. For instance, antitrust regulators may block a merger if it reduces competition, or foreign investment committees may intervene in cross-border acquisitions. Arbitrageurs often assign probabilities to deal completion and calculate expected returns accordingly. A deal with high regulatory risk may offer a wider spread, but the probability of failure tempers the attractiveness of the trade.
Risk arbitrage also plays an important role in market efficiency. By narrowing the spread between target company stock prices and acquisition offers, arbitrageurs help align market prices with expected outcomes. Their activity provides liquidity to shareholders of target firms and signals market confidence—or skepticism—about deal success. In this sense, arbitrageurs act as informal referees of corporate transactions, reflecting collective judgment about feasibility.
Nevertheless, risk arbitrage is not without controversy. Critics argue that it can encourage speculative behavior and amplify volatility around merger announcements. Moreover, when deals collapse, arbitrageurs can suffer significant losses, as seen in high-profile failed mergers. The strategy requires not only financial acumen but also resilience in managing downside risk.
In conclusion, risk arbitrage is a sophisticated investment strategy that blends financial analysis with legal and regulatory insight. While it offers opportunities for profit, it demands careful risk management and a deep understanding of corporate dynamics. Far from being risk-free, it is a calculated gamble on the successful execution of complex transactions. For investors willing to navigate uncertainty, risk arbitrage remains a compelling, though challenging, avenue in modern financial markets.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: arbitrageurs, CASH, david marcinko, event drivien funds, finance, Investing, liquidity, merger arbitrage, personal-finance, probability analysis., risk arbitrage, stock market, stock trades, stocks | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
A Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) is a corporate entity created solely to raise capital through an initial public offering (IPO) with the intention of merging with or acquiring an existing private company. Unlike traditional firms, SPACs have no commercial operations at the time of their IPO. They exist as shell companies, holding investor funds in trust until a suitable target is identified. This unique structure has earned them the nickname “blank check companies.”
The lifecycle of a SPAC typically unfolds in three stages:
This process allows private firms to access public markets more quickly and with fewer regulatory hurdles compared to conventional IPOs.
SPACs gained traction because they offered several benefits:
Despite their appeal, SPACs are not without controversy:
SPACs first appeared in the 1990s but remained niche until the early 2020s, when they experienced a boom. In 2020 and 2021, hundreds of SPAC IPOs raised billions of dollars, fueled by market liquidity and investor enthusiasm. High-profile deals, such as DraftKings and Virgin Galactic, brought attention to the model. However, by the mid-2020s, enthusiasm cooled due to poor post-merger performance and tighter regulations.
SPACs represent a fascinating innovation in financial markets, offering an alternative to traditional IPOs. Their advantages in speed, flexibility, and access to capital made them attractive during periods of market optimism. Yet, their risks—misaligned incentives, uncertain outcomes, and regulatory challenges—have tempered investor enthusiasm. While SPACs are unlikely to disappear entirely, their future will depend on whether they can evolve into a more transparent and sustainable mechanism for taking companies public.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: david marcinko, De-SPAC, finance, Investing, IPO, IPOs, personal-finance, SPAC, SPACs, SPACs: Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, stock market, stocks | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
+ Plus / – Minus Two Weeks
Stock market crashes have long been associated with the fall season, particularly October, which has earned a reputation as a month of financial turmoil. While crashes can occur at any time, the clustering of several historic downturns in autumn has led many investors to believe that markets are more vulnerable during this period.
Some of the most devastating collapses in financial history have taken place in the fall. The Wall Street Crash of 1929 began in late October and marked the start of the Great Depression. In October 1987, markets experienced “Black Monday,” when the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged more than 20% in a single day. More recently, the global financial crisis of 2008 saw some of its steepest declines in September and October. These events have cemented autumn’s reputation as a season of heightened risk.
Several factors contribute to the perception that fall is a dangerous time for markets:
Despite the historical examples, statistical studies suggest that crashes are not inherently more likely in October than in other months. Market downturns are rare events, and their clustering in autumn may be more coincidence than causation. Crashes have also occurred outside the fall, such as the bursting of the dot-com bubble in spring 2000 and the COVID-19 crash in March 2020. This suggests that the so-called “October Effect” may be more psychological than empirical.
Whether or not fall crashes are statistically more likely, the historical record offers important lessons:
Stock market crashes are not guaranteed to happen in the fall, but history has made October synonymous with financial turmoil. The clustering of major downturns during this season has created a psychological bias that influences investor behavior. Whether coincidence or pattern, the lesson is clear: autumn is a time when vigilance, discipline, and preparation are especially important for market participants.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Portfolio Management | Tagged: black monday, david marcinko, december, finance, Investing, November, october, personal-finance, stock market, stock market crashes, stocks | 1 Comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
Options trading provides investors with a wide range of strategies to suit different market conditions. One of the more refined approaches is the butterfly spread, a strategy designed to profit from stability in the price of an underlying asset. It combines multiple option contracts at different strike prices to create a position with limited risk and limited reward. The name comes from the shape of its profit-and-loss diagram, which resembles the wings of a butterfly.
A typical butterfly spread involves four options contracts with three strike prices. In a long call butterfly spread, the investor buys one call at a lower strike, sells two calls at a middle strike, and buys one call at a higher strike. This creates a payoff that peaks if the underlying asset closes at the middle strike price. Losses are capped at the initial premium paid, while profits are capped at the difference between the strikes minus the premium.
Butterfly spreads can be built with calls, puts, or a mix of both:
Each variation adapts to different market expectations, but all share the principle of balancing risk and reward.
Suppose a stock trades at $100, and the investor expects it to remain near that level. They could set up a butterfly spread with strikes at $95, $100, and $105. If the stock closes at $100, the strategy delivers maximum profit. If the stock moves significantly away from $100, the investor’s loss is limited to the premium paid. This makes the butterfly spread particularly useful in calm, low-volatility markets.
The butterfly spread is a disciplined options strategy that thrives in stable markets. It offers a balance between risk control and profit potential, making it attractive to traders who prefer structured outcomes. While the rewards are capped, the defined risk and cost efficiency make butterfly spreads a valuable tool for investors who anticipate minimal price movement and want to manage their exposure carefully.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: butterfly spread, BUTTERFLY SPREAD INVESTING, david marcinko, finance, Investing, iron butterfly, long call, long put, options, personal-finance, stock market, stocks, strike price | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
In the modern era of globalization, financial instruments that connect investors across borders have become indispensable. Among these, American Depository Receipts (ADRs) stand out as a powerful mechanism that allows U.S. investors to participate in foreign equity markets without the complexities of international trading. ADRs not only simplify access to global companies but also enhance the ability of foreign corporations to raise capital in the United States. This essay explores the origins, structure, regulatory frameworks, benefits, risks, and real-world examples of ADRs, highlighting their role in the integration of global finance.
The concept of ADRs emerged in 1927 when J.P. Morgan introduced the first ADR for the British retailer Selfridges. At the time, American investors faced significant hurdles in purchasing foreign shares, including currency conversion, unfamiliar trading practices, and regulatory differences. ADRs solved these problems by creating a U.S.-based certificate that represented ownership in foreign shares, denominated in dollars, and traded on American exchanges.
Over the decades, ADRs expanded rapidly, especially during the post-World War II era when globalization accelerated. By the late 20th century, ADRs had become a mainstream tool for accessing international equities, with companies from Europe, Asia, and Latin America increasingly using them to tap into U.S. capital markets.
An ADR is issued by a U.S. depositary bank, which holds the underlying shares of a foreign company in custody. Each ADR corresponds to a specific number of shares—sometimes one, sometimes multiple, or even a fraction. Investors buy and sell ADRs in U.S. dollars, and dividends are paid in dollars as well, eliminating the need for currency conversion.
Key structural features include:
ADRs are subject to U.S. securities regulations, which vary depending on the level of ADR issued:
This tiered system ensures that investors receive appropriate levels of transparency while giving foreign companies flexibility in their approach to U.S. markets.
ADRs offer numerous advantages to American investors:
Foreign corporations also benefit significantly from ADRs:
Despite their advantages, ADRs carry certain risks:
1. Alibaba Group (China) Alibaba’s ADRs, listed on the NYSE in 2014, marked one of the largest IPOs in history, raising $25 billion. This demonstrated the power of ADRs to connect Chinese companies with American investors, despite regulatory complexities between the two countries.
2. Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan) Toyota’s ADRs have long provided U.S. investors with access to one of the world’s largest automakers. By listing ADRs, Toyota expanded its investor base and strengthened its global presence.
3. Royal Dutch Shell (Netherlands/UK) Shell’s ADRs illustrate how multinational corporations use ADRs to maintain visibility in U.S. markets while managing complex cross-border structures.
ADRs embody the globalization of capital markets. They facilitate cross-border investment, enhance market efficiency, and foster economic integration. For investors, ADRs represent a gateway to international diversification. For companies, they provide access to the deepest capital markets in the world.
American Depositary Receipts are more than just financial instruments; they are symbols of global interconnectedness. By bridging the gap between U.S. investors and foreign companies, ADRs have reshaped the landscape of international finance. They balance convenience with exposure to global risks, offering both opportunities and challenges. As globalization continues to evolve, ADRs will remain a vital tool for investors and corporations alike, reinforcing their role as a cornerstone of modern capital markets.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Glossary Terms, Marcinko Associates, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: ADR banks, ADR ratios, ADRs, Alibaba, American Depository Receipts, capital markets, david marcinko, finance, Ford, GAAP, IFRS, Investing, JP Morgan, SEC, stock market, stocks, toyota | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
SPONSOR. http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
Volatility is often described as the pulse of financial markets, reflecting the collective emotions of investors as they respond to uncertainty, risk, and opportunity. Among the many tools designed to measure this phenomenon, the CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, stands out as the most widely recognized. Dubbed the “fear gauge,” the VIX captures market expectations of near-term volatility in the S&P 500, derived from options pricing. Its movements often mirror investor sentiment: rising sharply during periods of crisis and falling when confidence returns. Yet, the VIX is not alone. A family of volatility indices exists across global markets, each offering unique insights into sector-specific or regional risk.
The importance of volatility indices lies in their ability to quantify uncertainty. Traditional measures such as historical volatility look backward, analyzing past price fluctuations. In contrast, indices like the VIX are forward-looking, reflecting implied volatility based on options markets. This distinction makes them invaluable for traders, portfolio managers, and policymakers. For example, a sudden spike in the VIX often signals heightened fear, prompting investors to hedge positions or reduce exposure to equities. Conversely, a low VIX suggests complacency, though it can also precede unexpected shocks.
Beyond the VIX, other indices provide complementary perspectives. The VXN tracks volatility in the Nasdaq-100, often dominated by technology stocks. Because the tech sector is highly sensitive to innovation cycles and regulatory changes, the VXN can diverge significantly from the VIX, highlighting sector-specific risks. Similarly, the RVX measures volatility in the Russell 2000, offering a window into small-cap stocks that are more vulnerable to domestic economic conditions. Internationally, indices such as the VSTOXX in Europe and India VIX extend this framework globally, allowing investors to compare risk sentiment across regions. Together, these indices form a mosaic of market psychology, enabling a more nuanced understanding of global financial stability.
Volatility indices also play a crucial role in risk management. Derivatives linked to these indices, such as futures and exchange-traded products, allow investors to hedge against sudden downturns. For instance, during the 2008 financial crisis, demand for VIX futures surged as investors sought protection from extreme market swings. More recently, volatility products have become popular among retail traders, though their complexity and tendency to lose value over time make them risky for long-term holding.
Critics argue that volatility indices can be misleading. A low VIX does not guarantee stability, and a high VIX does not always signal disaster. Moreover, the rise of volatility-linked products has occasionally amplified market stress, as seen during the “Volmageddon” event of February 2018, when inverse volatility ETFs collapsed. These episodes underscore the need for caution: volatility indices are powerful tools, but they must be used with a clear understanding of their limitations.
In conclusion, volatility indices such as the VIX serve as vital instruments for gauging investor sentiment and managing risk. They provide a forward-looking measure of uncertainty, complementing traditional metrics and offering insights across sectors and regions. While not infallible, their role in modern finance is undeniable.
For traders, analysts, and policymakers alike, these indices are more than numbers on a screen—they are reflections of the market’s collective psyche, guiding decisions in times of both calm and crisis.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: “Volmageddon”, CBOE, david marcinko, DJIA, ETFs, fear guage, finance, financial advisors, India VIX, Investing, investment advisors, NASDAQ, RVX, stock brokers, stock traders, stocks, VIX, Volatility Index, VSTOXX, VXN | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
Money is a powerful tool. It can provide security, open opportunities, and help build a fulfilling life. Yet, when mismanaged, it can quickly become a source of stress and regret. Understanding the worst ways to use money is essential for anyone who wants to avoid financial pitfalls and build lasting stability.
One of the most damaging habits is spending without thought. Buying items on impulse—whether it’s clothes, gadgets, or luxury goods—often leads to regret and wasted resources. These purchases rarely align with long‑term goals and can drain savings meant for emergencies or investments.
Credit cards and payday loans can trap people in cycles of debt. Paying 20% or more in interest means that even small purchases balloon into massive financial burdens. Using debt irresponsibly is one of the fastest ways to erode wealth.
Failing to save for the future is another critical mistake. Without an emergency fund, unexpected expenses like medical bills or car repairs can derail financial stability. Similarly, neglecting investments means missing out on compound growth that builds wealth over time.
From pyramid schemes to speculative “hot tips,” chasing unrealistic returns is a recipe for disaster. These schemes prey on greed and impatience, often leaving participants with nothing but losses. Sustainable wealth comes from patience and discipline, not shortcuts.
Many people waste money trying to impress others—buying luxury cars, designer clothes, or extravagant experiences they cannot afford. This pursuit of status often leads to debt and financial insecurity, while providing only fleeting satisfaction.
Skipping health, auto, or home insurance to save money may seem smart in the short term, but it can be catastrophic when disaster strikes. Without protection, one accident or emergency can wipe out years of savings.
Living without a plan is like sailing without a map. Without a budget, it’s easy to overspend, miss bills, or fail to allocate money toward goals. Budgeting is not restrictive—it’s empowering, because it ensures money is used intentionally.
Spending money without investing in personal growth is another hidden mistake. Education, training, and skill development often yield lifelong returns. Neglecting these opportunities can limit earning potential and financial independence.
The worst things to do with money often stem from short‑term thinking, lack of discipline, or the desire for instant gratification. Impulse spending, high‑interest debt, chasing schemes, and neglecting savings all undermine financial health. By avoiding these traps and focusing on budgeting, investing wisely, and protecting against risks, money can serve as a foundation for security and freedom rather than a source of stress.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", "Doctors Only", economics, Ethics, finance, Financial Planning, Insurance Matters, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: bad money moves, budgeting, CASH, david marcinko, DO, DPM, finance, insurance, interest rates, Investing, investments, MD, money, personal-finance, savings, spending, stocks, wealth manasgement | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Diworsification is a term coined by Peter Lynch to describe when investors over‑diversify their portfolios, adding too many holdings and ultimately reducing returns instead of improving them.
Diversification has long been heralded as one of the cornerstones of sound investing. By spreading capital across different asset classes, industries, and geographies, investors can reduce risk and protect themselves against the volatility of individual securities. Yet, as with many strategies, there exists a point where the benefits diminish and the practice becomes counterproductive. This phenomenon, known as diworsification, was popularized by legendary investor Peter Lynch to describe the tendency of investors and corporations to dilute their strengths by expanding too broadly.
At its core, diworsification occurs when the pursuit of safety leads to excessive complexity. For individual investors, this often manifests in portfolios bloated with dozens or even hundreds of stocks, mutual funds, or exchange‑traded funds. While the intention is to minimize risk, the result is frequently a portfolio that mirrors the market index but with higher costs and less focus. Instead of achieving superior returns, the investor ends up with average performance weighed down by management fees, trading expenses, and the difficulty of monitoring so many positions. In essence, the investor has sacrificed the potential for meaningful gains in exchange for a false sense of security.
Corporations are not immune to this trap. In the corporate world, diworsification describes the tendency of firms to expand into unrelated businesses, diluting their competitive advantage. A company that excels in consumer electronics, for example, may attempt to branch into unrelated industries such as food services or real estate. Without the expertise, synergies, or strategic fit, these ventures often fail to deliver value, distracting management and eroding shareholder wealth. History is replete with examples of conglomerates that grew too large, too fast, only to later divest their non‑core businesses in recognition of the inefficiencies created.
The dangers of diworsification are not merely theoretical. They highlight the importance of discipline in both investing and corporate strategy. For investors, the lesson is clear: diversification should be purposeful, not indiscriminate. A well‑constructed portfolio might include a mix of equities, bonds, and alternative assets, but each holding should serve a specific role—whether it is growth, income, or risk mitigation. Beyond a certain point, adding more securities does not reduce risk meaningfully; instead, it complicates decision‑making and reduces the chance of outperforming the market.
Similarly, for corporations, strategic focus is paramount. Expansion should be guided by core competencies and long‑term vision rather than the allure of short‑term growth. Firms that resist the temptation to chase every opportunity are better positioned to strengthen their brand, innovate within their domain, and deliver sustainable value to shareholders.
In conclusion, diworsification serves as a cautionary tale against the excesses of diversification. While spreading risk is essential, overdoing it can undermine performance and clarity. Both investors and corporations must strike a balance between breadth and focus, ensuring that every addition to a portfolio or business strategy enhances rather than dilutes overall strength. In other words, “diversification means you will always have to say you’re sorry.”
True wisdom lies not in owning everything, but in owning the right things.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: capital asset classes, CASH, david marcinko, di-worsification, diversification, finance, Investing, investment, investors, personal-finance, Peter Lynch, sorry, stocks | Leave a comment »
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
The NASDAQ, short for the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations, is one of the largest and most influential stock exchanges in the world. Founded in 1971, it was the first electronic stock market, revolutionizing how securities were traded by replacing traditional floor-based systems with computerized trading platforms. This innovation made transactions faster, more transparent, and accessible to a broader range of investors.
Unlike the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), which historically operated through physical trading floors, the NASDAQ is entirely virtual. It connects buyers and sellers through a sophisticated network of computers, allowing for rapid execution of trades. This digital-first approach has made it particularly attractive to technology companies and growth-oriented firms, earning it a reputation as the go-to exchange for innovative and high-tech businesses.
Companies Listed on the NASDAQ The NASDAQ is home to some of the most prominent and influential companies in the world. Giants like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google (Alphabet), Meta (formerly Facebook), and Tesla all trade on the NASDAQ. These companies are part of the NASDAQ-100, an index that tracks the performance of the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the exchange. The NASDAQ Composite Index, which includes over 3,000 stocks, provides a broader snapshot of the market’s overall health and direction.
How It Works The NASDAQ operates as a dealer’s market, meaning transactions are facilitated by market makers—firms that stand ready to buy or sell securities at publicly quoted prices. These market makers help maintain liquidity and ensure that trades can be executed efficiently. Prices are determined by supply and demand, and the electronic nature of the exchange allows for real-time updates and high-speed trading.
Significance in the Global Economy The NASDAQ plays a vital role in the global financial system. It provides companies with access to capital by allowing them to issue shares to the public, and it offers investors a platform to buy and sell those shares. The performance of the NASDAQ is often seen as a barometer for the health of the technology sector and, more broadly, the innovation economy. When the NASDAQ rises, it typically signals investor confidence in growth and future earnings; when it falls, it may reflect concerns about economic stability or company performance.
Global Reach and Influence Though based in the United States, the NASDAQ’s influence extends worldwide. Many international companies choose to list on the NASDAQ to gain exposure to U.S. investors and benefit from the prestige associated with being part of a leading global exchange. Its technological infrastructure and regulatory standards make it a model for other exchanges around the world.
NASDAQ 100: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2023/07/24/nasdaq-100-re-balanced-index/
In summary, the NASDAQ is more than just a stock exchange—it’s a symbol of innovation, speed, and global connectivity. Its pioneering approach to electronic trading has reshaped the financial landscape, and its roster of companies continues to drive technological progress and economic growth across the globe.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, economics, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: business, economy, finance, Marcinko, NASDAQ, National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations, New York Stock Exchange, NYSE, stocks | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
The 3-5-7 Rule is a trading strategy that helps investors manage risk and maximize gains by setting clear limits on losses and targets for profits. It’s a simple yet powerful framework for disciplined decision-making.
In the volatile world of trading, success often hinges not just on identifying opportunities but on managing risk with precision. The 3-5-7 Rule is a widely respected risk management strategy designed to help traders protect their capital while pursuing consistent returns. This rule provides a structured approach to trading by setting specific thresholds for risk exposure and profit expectations.
At its core, the 3-5-7 Rule breaks down into three key components:
The beauty of the 3-5-7 Rule lies in its simplicity and adaptability. It can be applied across various asset classes—stocks, forex, crypto—and suits both beginners and seasoned traders. By enforcing discipline, it helps traders avoid emotional decisions, such as chasing losses or holding onto losing positions too long. Moreover, this rule encourages thoughtful position sizing. Traders must calculate their entry and exit points carefully, factoring in stop-loss levels and account size. This analytical approach fosters better trade planning and reduces impulsive behavior.
Another advantage is its scalability. As a trader’s account grows, the percentages remain constant, but the dollar amounts adjust accordingly. This keeps the strategy relevant and effective regardless of portfolio size. In practice, the 3-5-7 Rule acts as a safety net. It doesn’t guarantee profits, but it significantly reduces the likelihood of catastrophic losses. It also promotes consistency, which is crucial for long-term success in trading.
In conclusion, the 3-5-7 Rule is more than just a guideline—it’s a mindset. It teaches traders to respect risk, plan strategically, and aim for favorable outcomes.
By adhering to this rule, traders can navigate the unpredictable markets with greater confidence and control.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: finance, Investing, investor trading strategy, investors, personal-finance, profit target, risk per trade, stock market, stock markets, stock trader, stocks, total exposure, trading strategy | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
High-frequency trading (HFT) is a form of algorithmic trading that uses powerful computers and complex programs to execute thousands of trades in fractions of a second. It has transformed modern financial markets by increasing speed, liquidity, and efficiency—but also raised concerns about fairness and stability.
High-frequency trading emerged in the early 2000s as technological advances allowed financial firms to process market data and execute trades faster than ever before. HFT firms use sophisticated algorithms to analyze multiple markets and identify short-term opportunities. These trades are often held for mere seconds or milliseconds, and profits are made by exploiting tiny price discrepancies across assets or exchanges.
One of the defining features of HFT is its reliance on speed. Firms invest heavily in infrastructure—such as co-location services near exchange servers and fiber-optic cables—to gain microsecond advantages over competitors. This race for speed has led to a technological arms race, where milliseconds can mean millions in profit.
HFT contributes significantly to market liquidity, meaning it helps ensure that buyers and sellers can transact quickly at stable prices. By constantly placing and updating orders, HFT firms narrow bid-ask spreads and reduce transaction costs for other market participants. This has made markets more efficient and accessible, especially for retail investors.
However, HFT is not without controversy. Critics argue that it creates an uneven playing field, where firms with access to advanced technology and capital can dominate markets. Concerns about market manipulation—such as quote stuffing (flooding the market with orders to slow competitors) or spoofing (placing fake orders to move prices)—have led to increased regulatory scrutiny.
The 2010 Flash Crash is often cited as a cautionary example of HFT’s potential risks. During this event, the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged nearly 1,000 points in minutes before rebounding. Investigations revealed that automated trading systems, including HFT algorithms, contributed to the sudden loss of liquidity and extreme volatility.
Regulators have responded by implementing safeguards such as circuit breakers, which pause trading during extreme price movements, and requiring firms to register and disclose their trading strategies. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) continue to monitor HFT’s impact on market integrity.
Despite its challenges, HFT remains a dominant force in global finance. It accounts for a significant portion of trading volume in equities, futures, and foreign exchange markets. Many institutional investors rely on HFT strategies to manage large portfolios and hedge risks.
In conclusion, high-frequency trading represents both the promise and peril of technological innovation in finance. While it enhances market efficiency and liquidity, it also introduces new risks and ethical dilemmas.
As markets evolve, balancing innovation with fairness and stability will be essential to ensuring that HFT serves the broader interests of investors and the economy.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Glossary Terms, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: algorithmic trading, CFTC, computer trading, david marcinko, finance, FINRA, Flash Crash, HFT, HIGH-FREQUENCY TRADING, Investing, passive income, SEC, stock market, stock markets, stock trading, stocks | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
The Sraffa–Hayek debate stands as a pivotal moment in the history of economic thought, highlighting deep philosophical and methodological differences between two influential schools: the Austrian School, represented by Friedrich Hayek, and the neo-Ricardian or Cambridge School, represented by Piero Sraffa. Taking place primarily in the 1930s, this intellectual exchange centered on the nature of capital, the role of equilibrium, and the validity of marginalist theory.
Friedrich Hayek, a staunch advocate of Austrian economics, had developed a theory of business cycles rooted in the mis allocation of capital due to artificially low interest rates. In his framework, interest rates serve as signals that coordinate inter temporal production decisions. When central banks distort these signals, they cause over investment in capital-intensive industries, leading to unsustainable booms followed by inevitable busts. Hayek’s theory was grounded in a time-structured view of capital, emphasizing the importance of temporal coordination in production.
Piero Sraffa, a Cambridge economist and close associate of John Maynard Keynes, challenged Hayek’s assumptions in a 1932 review of Hayek’s book Prices and Production. Sraffa’s critique was both technical and philosophical. He questioned the coherence of Hayek’s notion of a uniform natural rate of interest in a complex economy with heterogeneous capital goods. Sraffa argued that in such an economy, there could be multiple natural rates of interest, making it impossible to define a single rate that equilibrates savings and investment across all sectors.
Moreover, Sraffa criticized the Austrian reliance on equilibrium analysis in a world characterized by uncertainty and institutional complexity. He contended that Hayek’s model was overly abstract and detached from real-world dynamics. This critique foreshadowed Sraffa’s later work, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (1960), which laid the foundation for the neo-Ricardian critique of marginalist economics. In that work, Sraffa demonstrated that prices and distribution could be determined without recourse to subjective utility or marginal productivity, challenging the core of neoclassical theory.
The debate had far-reaching implications. For the Austrian School, it exposed vulnerabilities in their capital theory and prompted refinements in their approach to intertemporal coordination. For the broader economics profession, Sraffa’s critique contributed to a growing skepticism about the internal consistency of marginalist value theory, influencing the Cambridge capital controversies of the 1950s and 1960s.
While the Sraffa–Hayek debate did not produce a definitive victor, it underscored the importance of foundational assumptions in economic modeling. It also highlighted the tension between abstract theoretical elegance and empirical relevance—a tension that continues to shape economic discourse today. Ultimately, the debate enriched the intellectual landscape by forcing economists to confront the limitations of their models and to grapple with the complex realities of capital, time, and uncertainty.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", economics, finance, Glossary Terms, Healthcare Finance, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: Austrian Economics, commodities, david marcinko, economic debate, economics, Hayek, Investing, Keynes, Piero Sraffa, politics, Ricardian economics, Srfaffa-Hayek, stocks, The Sraffa–Hayek Economic Debate | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
Short Interest Theory suggests that high levels of short interest in a stock may actually signal a potential price increase, contrary to traditional bearish interpretations.
Short Interest Theory is a contrarian investment concept that challenges conventional wisdom in financial markets. Traditionally, a high short interest—meaning a large percentage of a company’s shares are being sold short—is seen as a bearish signal, indicating that many investors expect the stock’s price to decline. However, Short Interest Theory flips this assumption, proposing that a high short interest can actually be a bullish indicator, suggesting a potential upward price movement due to a phenomenon known as a “short squeeze.”
To understand this theory, it’s important to grasp the mechanics of short selling. When investors short a stock, they borrow shares and sell them on the open market, hoping to repurchase them later at a lower price and pocket the difference. However, if the stock price rises instead of falling, short sellers face mounting losses. To limit these losses, they may be forced to buy back the stock at higher prices, which increases demand and drives the price up even further. This chain reaction is what’s known as a short squeeze.
Short Interest Theory posits that when short interest reaches unusually high levels, the stock becomes a prime candidate for a short squeeze. Investors who follow this theory look for stocks with high short interest ratios—often measured as the number of shares sold short divided by the stock’s average daily trading volume. A high ratio suggests that it would take many days for all short sellers to cover their positions, increasing the likelihood of a rapid price surge if positive news or buying pressure emerges.
This theory gained widespread attention during the GameStop (GME) saga in early 2021. Retail investors noticed that GME had an extremely high short interest—more than 100% of its float—and began buying shares en masse. This triggered a historic short squeeze, sending the stock price soaring and forcing institutional short sellers to cover their positions at massive losses. The event served as a real-world validation of Short Interest Theory and highlighted the power of collective investor behavior in modern markets.
Despite its appeal, Short Interest Theory is not without risks. Betting on a short squeeze can be speculative and volatile. Not all heavily shorted stocks experience upward momentum; some may continue to decline if the negative sentiment is justified by poor fundamentals or weak earnings. Moreover, timing a short squeeze is notoriously difficult, and investors can suffer significant losses if the anticipated rebound fails to materialize.
In conclusion, Short Interest Theory offers a compelling contrarian perspective on market sentiment. By interpreting high short interest as a potential bullish signal, it encourages investors to look beyond surface-level indicators and consider the dynamics of market psychology and trading behavior. While it can lead to lucrative opportunities, especially in the context of short squeezes, it also demands careful analysis and risk management. As with any investment strategy, understanding the underlying fundamentals and market context is essential for making informed decisions.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Practice Management | Tagged: bulls, david marcinko, finance, GME, Investing, personal-finance, retail investors, short interest theory, short squeeze, short stocks, shorted stocks, stock market, stocks | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
***
Valuing a medical practice involves assessing its financial performance, assets, and intangible factors like goodwill and patient loyalty to determine its fair market worth.
Determining the value of a medical practice is a nuanced process that blends financial analysis with strategic insight. Whether you’re preparing to sell, merge, or bring in a partner, understanding how to value your practice ensures informed decision-making and fair negotiations.
There are several recognized methods for valuing a medical practice, each suited to different scenarios. The most common include the income approach, market approach, asset-based approach, and the rule-of-thumb method.
The income approach focuses on the practice’s ability to generate future earnings. This method involves analyzing historical financial statements, projecting future cash flows, and discounting them to present value using a risk-adjusted rate. It’s particularly useful when the practice has stable revenue and predictable expenses. Key metrics include net income, physician productivity, and reimbursement rates.
The market approach compares the practice to similar ones that have recently sold. It relies on data from comparable transactions, adjusted for differences in size, specialty, location, and profitability. This method is ideal when reliable market data is available, though such data can be scarce for niche specialties or rural practices.
The asset-based approach calculates the value of tangible and intangible assets. Tangible assets include medical equipment, office furniture, and real estate. Intangible assets—like patient records, brand reputation, and goodwill—are harder to quantify but can significantly impact value. Goodwill, for instance, reflects the practice’s reputation, patient loyalty, and referral networks.
The rule-of-thumb method uses industry benchmarks, such as a multiple of annual revenue or earnings. For example, a general practice might be valued at 60–80% of annual gross revenue. While quick and easy, this method oversimplifies and may not reflect the unique strengths or weaknesses of a specific practice.https:/https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/03/17/medial-practice-valuation-adjustments//medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/03/17/medial-practice-valuation-adjustments/
Beyond these methods, several qualitative factors influence valuation. These include the size and diversity of the patient base, the practice’s specialty, use of technology (like EHR systems or telemedicine), and whether key physicians will remain post-sale. A practice heavily reliant on one provider may be less valuable than one with a strong team and succession plan.
***
***
Timing also matters. Economic conditions, regulatory changes, and shifts in healthcare reimbursement can affect practice value. Tax implications and deal structure—such as asset sale vs. stock sale—should also be considered during negotiations.
Ultimately, valuing a medical practice is both art and science. Engaging a professional appraiser or valuation expert can help ensure accuracy and objectivity. They bring experience, access to market data, and the ability to tailor valuation methods to your specific situation.
In summary, a comprehensive valuation considers financial performance, assets, market trends, and intangible factors. By understanding these elements, practice owners can make strategic decisions that reflect the true worth of their medical enterprise.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", "Doctors Only", CMP Program, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Marcinko Associates, Practice Management | Tagged: asset based approach, CMP, david marcinko, healthcare, income approach, market approach, medical practice, medical practice value, rule thumb, stocks, Technology, valuation | Leave a comment »
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
The S&P 500, short for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, is one of the most widely followed stock market indices in the world. It tracks the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States, offering a broad snapshot of the overall health and direction of the U.S. economy. Created in 1957 by the financial services company Standard & Poor’s, the index has become a benchmark for investors, analysts, and economists alike.
Composition and Criteria The S&P 500 includes companies from a wide range of industries, such as technology, healthcare, finance, energy, and consumer goods. To be included in the index, a company must meet specific criteria: it must be based in the U.S., have a market capitalization of at least $14.5 billion (as of 2025), be highly liquid, and have a public float of at least 50% of its shares. Additionally, the company must have positive earnings in the most recent quarter and over the sum of its most recent four quarters.
Some of the most recognizable names in the S&P 500 include Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan Chase, and ExxonMobil. These companies are selected by a committee that reviews eligibility and ensures the index remains representative of the broader market.
How It Works The S&P 500 is a market-capitalization-weighted index, meaning that companies with larger market values have a greater influence on the index’s performance. For example, a significant movement in Apple’s stock price will affect the index more than a similar movement in a smaller company’s stock. This weighting system helps reflect the real impact of large corporations on the economy.
The index is updated in real time during trading hours and is used by investors to gauge market trends. It also serves as the basis for many investment products, such as mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which aim to replicate its performance.
VIX: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/10/12/vix-the-stock-market-fear-gauge/
Why It Matters The S&P 500 is considered a leading indicator of U.S. equity markets and the economy as a whole. When the index rises, it often signals investor confidence and economic growth. Conversely, a decline may indicate uncertainty or economic slowdown. Because it includes companies from diverse sectors, the S&P 500 provides a more balanced view than narrower indices like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which only tracks 30 companies.
Investment and Strategy Many investors use the S&P 500 as a benchmark to measure the performance of their portfolios. Passive investment strategies, such as index funds, aim to match the returns of the S&P 500 rather than beat it. This approach has gained popularity due to its low fees and consistent long-term performance.
In summary, the S&P 500 is more than just a number—it’s a powerful tool that reflects the pulse of the American economy. By tracking the performance of 500 major companies, it offers insights into market trends, investor sentiment, and economic health. Whether you’re a seasoned investor or just starting out, understanding the S&P 500 is essential to navigating the world of finance.
VIX Today: 20.81USD▲ +1.78 (+9.35%) today
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, economics, finance, Glossary Terms, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: ETFs, finance, Investing, Marcinko, market-capitalization-weighted index, personal-finance, portfolio construction, S&P 500, Standard & Poor’s 500 index, stock market, stocks, VIX | Leave a comment »
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
The weekend of October 10–12, 2025, marked one of the most dramatic downturns in global financial markets in recent memory. What began as a series of unsettling headlines quickly snowballed into a full-blown market crash, sending shockwaves through economies and portfolios worldwide. This event was not the result of a single catalyst but rather a convergence of geopolitical tensions, speculative excess, and investor psychology.
At the heart of the crisis was a sudden escalation in U.S.–China trade relations. President Donald Trump abruptly canceled a scheduled diplomatic meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping and announced a sweeping 100% tariff on all Chinese imports. This move reignited fears of a prolonged trade war, reminiscent of the economic standoff that rattled markets in the late 2010s. Investors, already jittery from months of uncertainty, interpreted the announcement as a signal of deteriorating global cooperation and retaliatory economic measures to come.
VIX: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/10/12/vix-the-stock-market-fear-gauge/
The impact was immediate and severe. Major U.S. indices plummeted: the S&P 500 dropped 2.7%, the Nasdaq fell 3.6%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 1.9%. These declines marked the worst single-day performance since April and triggered automatic trading halts in several sectors. The selloff was not confined to the United States; European and Asian markets mirrored the panic, with steep losses across the board.
Compounding the crisis was a massive liquidation in the cryptocurrency market. As traditional assets tumbled, investors rushed to offload digital holdings, leading to the largest crypto wipeout in history. Trillions of dollars in value evaporated within hours, further destabilizing investor confidence and draining liquidity from the broader financial system.
Another underlying factor was growing concern over the valuation of artificial intelligence (AI) stocks. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) had recently issued a warning that the AI sector was exhibiting signs of a speculative bubble, drawing parallels to the dot-com era. With many AI companies trading at astronomical price-to-earnings ratios, the crash exposed the fragility of investor sentiment and the dangers of overexuberance in emerging technologies.
Perhaps most telling was the psychological shift among investors. The weekend saw widespread capitulation, with many choosing to exit the market entirely rather than weather further volatility. This behavior—marked by fear-driven decision-making and herd mentality—is often a hallmark of deeper financial crises. It underscores the importance of trust and stability in maintaining market equilibrium.
Abbvie: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/09/04/abbvie-the-economic-recession/
In conclusion, the October 2025 stock market crash was a multifaceted event driven by geopolitical shocks, speculative risk, and emotional contagion. It serves as a stark reminder of how interconnected and fragile global markets have become. As policymakers and investors assess the damage, the focus must shift toward restoring confidence, recalibrating risk, and ensuring that future growth is built on sustainable foundations rather than speculative fervor.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: ME-P Editor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", economics, Financial Planning, Investing, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: 2025 crash, AbbVie, AI, david marcinko, DJIA, Donald Trump, DOW, economy, finance, IMF, Investing, NASDAQ, october crash, S&P 500, stock market crash, stocks, Xi JinPing | Leave a comment »
DEFINED
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), often referred to simply as “the Dow,” is one of the oldest and most well-known stock market indices in the world. It was created in 1896 by Charles Dow, the co-founder of The Wall Street Journal, and is designed to represent the performance of the broader U.S. stock market, specifically focusing on 30 large, publicly traded companies. These companies are considered leaders in their respective industries and serve as a barometer for the overall health of the U.S. economy.
The DJIA includes 30 companies, which are selected by the editors of The Wall Street Journal based on various factors such as market influence, reputation, and the stability of the company. These companies represent a wide array of sectors, including technology, finance, healthcare, consumer goods, and energy. Notably, the companies chosen for the DJIA are not necessarily the largest companies in the U.S. by market capitalization, but rather those that are most indicative of the broader economy. Some of the prominent companies listed in the DJIA include names like Apple, Microsoft, Coca-Cola, and Johnson & Johnson.
However, the list of 30 companies is not static. Over time, companies may be added or removed to reflect changes in the economic landscape. For example, if a company experiences significant decline or no longer represents a leading sector, it might be replaced with another company that better reflects modern economic trends. This periodic reshuffling ensures that the DJIA continues to be a relevant measure of economic activity.
The DJIA is a price-weighted index, which means that the value of the index is determined by the share price of the component companies, rather than their market capitalization. To calculate the DJIA, the sum of the stock prices of all 30 companies is divided by a special divisor. This divisor adjusts for stock splits, dividends, and other corporate actions to maintain the integrity of the index over time. The price-weighted method means that higher-priced stocks have a greater impact on the movement of the index, regardless of the overall size or economic weight of the company.
For instance, if a company with a higher stock price like Apple experiences a significant change in value, it will influence the DJIA more than a company with a lower stock price, even if the latter has a larger market capitalization. This makes the DJIA somewhat different from other indices, like the S&P 500, which is weighted by market cap and gives more weight to larger companies in terms of their economic impact.
The DJIA is widely regarded as a barometer of the U.S. stock market’s performance. Investors and analysts closely monitor the movements of the Dow to gauge the overall health of the economy. When the DJIA rises, it generally suggests that investors are optimistic about the economic outlook and that large companies are performing well. Conversely, when the DJIA falls, it often signals economic uncertainty or a downturn in market conditions.
Despite being a narrow index, with only 30 companies, the DJIA holds substantial sway in financial markets. It is widely covered in the media and is often cited in discussions about the state of the economy. In fact, the performance of the DJIA is considered a key indicator of investor sentiment and economic confidence.
However, the DJIA has its limitations. Since it only includes 30 companies, it does not necessarily represent the broader market or capture the performance of smaller companies. Other indices, like the S&P 500, which includes 500 companies, offer a more comprehensive view of the market’s performance.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a key metric for understanding the state of the U.S. economy and the stock market. Although it has evolved over the years, it continues to provide valuable insights into the performance of large, influential companies. While it is not a perfect reflection of the market as a whole, the DJIA remains one of the most important and widely recognized indices in global finance. Through its historical significance and its role in shaping market sentiment, the Dow has cemented its place as a cornerstone of financial analysis.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: economics, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, iMBA, Inc., Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: 30 companie, business, Charles Dow, DJIA, DOW, Dow Jones Industrial Average, finance, Investing, Marcinko, narrow index, NASDAQ, price weighted index, S&P 500, stock markets, stocks, Wall Street Journal, WSJ | Leave a comment »
By Staff Reporters
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
“THE INVESTOR’S CHIEF problem—even his worst enemy—is likely to be himself.” So wrote Benjamin Graham, the father of modern investment analysis.
With these words, written in 1949, Graham acknowledged the reality that investors are human. Though he had written an 800 page book on techniques to analyze stocks and bonds, Graham understood that investing is as much about human psychology as it is about numerical analysis.
In the decades since Graham’s passing, an entire field has emerged at the intersection of psychology and finance. Known as behavioral finance, its pioneers include Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky and Richard Thaler. Together, they and their peers have identified countless human foibles that interfere with our ability to make good financial decisions. These include hindsight bias, recency bias and overconfidence, among others. On my bookshelf, I have at least as many volumes on behavioral finance as I do on pure financial analysis, so I certainly put stock in these ideas.
At the same time, I think we’re being too hard on ourselves when we lay all of these biases at our feet. We shouldn’t conclude that we’re deficient because we’re so susceptible to biases. Rather, the problem is that finance isn’t a scientific field like math or physics. At best, it’s like chaos theory. Yes, there is some underlying logic, but it’s usually so hard to observe and understand that it might as well be random. The world of personal finance is bedeviled by paradoxes, so no individual—no matter how rational—can always make optimal decisions.
As we plan for our financial future, I think it’s helpful to be cognizant of these paradoxes. While there’s nothing we can do to control or change them, there is great value in being aware of them, so we can approach them with the right tools and the right mindset.
Here are just seven of the paradoxes that can bedevil financial decision-making:
How should you respond to these paradoxes? As you plan for your financial future, embrace the concept of “loosely held views.”
In other words, make financial plans, but continuously update your views, question your assumptions and rethink your priorities.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Subscribe, Refer and Like
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Taxation, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: annuity, Ben Graham, Buffett, Carnegies, Daniel Kahneman, diversificayion, economics, finance, financial, Financial Planning, Gates, growth investing, Index Funds, Investing, Marcinko, Mutual Funds, paradoxes, personal-finance, Richard Thaler, Rockefeller, stock market, stocks, value investing | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Alternative Investments, finance, Glossary Terms, Investing | Tagged: Bitcoin, commodities, crypto, DJIA, DOW, france, japan, NASDAQ, OPEC, S&P, stocks | Leave a comment »
By. A.I. and Staff Reporters
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", CMP Program, economics, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: CMP, commodities, core PCE, economics, energy, gold, inflation, oil, PCE, Russia, stocks | Leave a comment »
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, economics, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: bonds, crypto, crypto-currency, digital assets, Federal Reserve, FOMC, joblesds claims, PCE, stocks | Leave a comment »
BY DR. DAVID EDWARD MARCINKO; MBA MEd CMP™
***
***
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Value Stocks – Looking for Bargains!
The bargain-hunting value style is looking for shares that are under priced in relation to the company’s future potential. A physician value investor will invest in a company in the expectation that its shares will increase in value over time. Value investing is based essentially on quantitative criteria; asset values, cash flow, and discounted future earnings. The key properties of value shares are low Price/Earnings, Price/Sales ratios, and normally higher dividend yields.
On observing a company’s earnings growth, a value manager will decide whether to buy shares based on the company’s consistency or recovery prospects.
The key research questions are: 1) Does the current P/E ratio warrant an investment in a slow growth company or, 2) Is the company a higher growth candidate that has dropped in price due to a temporary problem. If this is the case, will the company’s earnings growth recover, and if so, when? The key to value investing is to find bargain shares (priced low historically or for temporary and/or irrational reasons), avoiding shares that are merely cheap (priced low because the company is failing).
The buying opportunity is identified when a company undergoing some immediate problems is perceived to have good chances of recovery in the medium to long term. If there is a loss in market confidence in the company, the share price may fall, and the value investor can step in. Once the share price has achieved a suitable value, reflecting the predicted turnaround in company performance, the shareholding is sold, realizing a capital gain.
And, a potential risk in value investing is that the company may not turn around, in which case the share price may stay static or fall.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit a RFP for speaking engagements: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Experts Invited, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Investing | Tagged: bargain stocks, bargain value stocks, finance, Investing, Marcinko, physicians value investing, stock market, stocks, value investing | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Investment bankers are not really bankers at all. The fact that the word banker appears in the name is partially responsible for the false impressions that exist in the medical community regarding the functions they perform.
For example, they are not permitted to accept deposit, provide checking accounts, or perform other activities normally construed to be commercial banking activities. An investment bank is simply a firm that specializes in helping other corporations obtain money they need under the most advantageous terms possible. When it comes to the actual process of having securities issued, the corporation approaches an investment banking firm, either directly, or through a competitive selection process and asks it to act as adviser and distributor.
MORE: https://www.amazon.ca/Management-Liability-Insurance-Protection-Strategies/dp/1498725988
Investment bankers, or under writers, as they are sometimes called, are middlemen in the capital markets for corporate securities. The corporation requiring the funds discusses the amount, type of security to be issued, price and other features of the security, as well as the cost to issuing the securities. All of these factors are negotiated in a process known as negotiated underwriting. If mutually acceptable terms are reached, the investment banking firm will be the middle man through which the securities are sold to the general public. Since such firms have many customers, they are able to sell new securities, without the costly search that individual corporations may require to sell its own security.
Thus, although the firm in need of additional capital must pay for the service, it is usually able to raise the additional capital at less expense through the use of an investment banker, than by selling the securities itself. The agreement between the investment banker and the corporation may be one of two types. The investment bank may agree to purchase, or underwrite, the entire issue of securities and to re-offer them to the general public. This is known as a firm commitment.
When an investment banker agrees to underwrite such a sale; it agrees to supply the corporation with a specified amount of money. The firm buys the securities with the intention to resell them. If it fails to sell the securities, the investment banker must still pay the agreed upon sum.
Thus, the risk of selling rests with the underwriter and not with the company issuing the securities.
INVESTMENT BANKING: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/04/17/understanding-tnvestment-banking-rules-securities-markets-brokerage-accounts-margin-and-debt/
***
The alternative agreement is a best efforts agreement in which the investment banker makes his best effort to sell the securities acting on behalf of the issuer, but does not guarantee a specified amount of money will be raised. When a corporation raises new capital through a public offering of stock, one might inquire where the stock comes from. The only source the corporation has is authorized, but previously un-issued stock. Anytime authorized, but previously un-issued stock (new stock) is issued to the public, it is known as a primary offering.
If it’s the very first time the corporation is making the offering, it’s also known as the Initial Public Offering (IPO). Anytime there is a primary offering of stock, the issuing corporation is raising additional equity capital.
A secondary offering, or distribution, on the other hand, is defined as an offering of a large block of outstanding stock. Most frequently, a secondary offering is the sale of a large block of stock owned by one or more stockholders. It is stock that has previously been issued and is now being re-sold by investors. Another case would be when a corporation re-sells its treasury stock.
STOCK BROKERS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/09/04/understanding-traditional-full-service-brokers/
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, Funding Basics, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: business, david marcinko, finance, firm committment, Initial Public Offering, Investing, investment bankers, IPO, primary offering, secondary offerings, SPARC, stock market, stock markets, stocks, underwriters, unissued stock | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
Here are some of the most common risks associated with fixed income securities.
The market value of the securities will be inversely affected by movements in interest rates. When rates rise, market prices of existing debt securities fall as these securities become less attractive to investors when compared to higher coupon new issues. As prices decline, bonds become cheaper so the overall return, when taking into account the discount, can compete with newly issued bonds at higher yields. When interest rates fall, market prices on existing fixed income securities tend to rise because these bonds become more attractive when compared to the newly issued bonds priced at lower rates.
Investors who need access to their principal prior to maturity have to rely on the secondary market to sell their securities. The price received may be more or less than the original purchase price and may depend, in general, on the level of interest rates, time to term, credit quality of the issuer and liquidity.
Among other reasons, prices may also be affected by current market conditions, or by the size of the trade (prices may be different for 10 bonds versus 1,000 bonds), etc. It is important to note that selling a security prior to maturity may affect actual yield received, which may be different than the yield at which the bond was originally purchased. This is because the initially quoted yield assumed holding the bond to term. As mentioned above, there is an inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices. Therefore, when interest rates decline, bond prices increase, and when interest rates increase, bond prices decline.
Generally, longer maturity bonds will be more sensitive to interest rate changes. Dollar for dollar, a long-term bond should go up or down in value more than a short-term bond for the same change in yield. Price risk can be determined through a statistic called duration, which is featured at the end of the fixed income section.
REVENUE BONDS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/12/20/bonds-revenue/
***
***
Liquidity risk is the risk that an investor will be unable to sell securities due to a lack of demand from potential buyers, sell them at a substantial loss and/or incur substantial transaction costs in the sale process. Broker/dealers, although not obligated to do so, may provide secondary markets.
Downward trends in interest rates also create reinvestment risk, or the risk that the income and/or principal repayments will have to be invested at lower rates. Reinvestment risk is an important consideration for investors in callable securities. Some bonds may be issued with a call feature that allows the issuer to call, or repay, bonds prior to maturity. This generally happens if the market rates fall low enough for the issuer to save money by repaying existing higher coupon bonds and issuing new ones at lower rates. Investors will stop receiving the coupon payments if the bonds are called. Generally, callable fixed income securities will not appreciate in value as much as comparable non-callable securities.
ZERO COUPON BONDS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/11/12/bonds-zero-coupon/
Similar to call risk, prepayment risk is the risk that the issuer may repay bonds prior to maturity. This type of risk is generally associated with mortgage-backed securities. Homeowners tend to prepay their mortgages at times that are advantageous to their needs, which may be in conflict with the holders of the mortgage-backed securities. If the bonds are repaid early, investors face the risk of reinvesting at lower rates.
Fixed income investors often focus on the real rate of return, or the actual return minus the rate of inflation. Rising inflation has a negative impact on real rates of return because inflation reduces the purchasing power of the investment income and principal.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2022/03/24/general-obligation-and-revenue-bonds/
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Experts Invited, finance, Financial Planning, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: bond risks, bonds, finance, fixed income risks, interest rate risks, Investing, liquidity risk, Marcinko, personal-finance, prepayment risks, price risks, purchasing power risk, reinvetment risks, stocks | Leave a comment »
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: Alternative Investments, finance, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: Bitcoin, crypto, cryptocurrency, FOMC, gold, Goldman Sachs, jobs report, stocks, Trump | Leave a comment »
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Subscribe and Refer
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", economics, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: Alphabet, bonds, commodities, Federal Reserve, FOMC, gold, google, JPMorgan, NASDAQ, oil, OPEC, Powell, S&P 500, stocks | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
***
***
Bonds: Treasury yields rose yesterday as investors dug into a Federal appeals court ruling last Friday stating that most of President Trump’s tariffs are illegal. The 30-year yield closed in on the key 5% level. Stocks: Equities tumbled across the board as technology stocks sold off and pulled the rest of the market down with them. Commodities: Gold hit a new record high as traders hedged against tariff uncertainty and braced themselves for an extremely important US jobs report on Friday that could make or break the case for the Fed to start cutting rates. |
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Refer, Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: bonds, commodities, Federal Resere, FOMC, gold, interest rates, IRS, jobs report, oil, stock markjets, stocks, tariffs, treasury bonds, Treasury yields, Trump | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Financial Planning, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: bears, bulls, Celsius, fed, FOMC, Labor Day, Pepsi, September, stock markes, stocks, Wall Street | Leave a comment »
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Refer, Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, finance, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: commodities, fed, Federal Reserve, FOMC, gold, indexes, Lisa Cook, Powell, stocks, Trump | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Read, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: economics, finance, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: bonds, China, fed, FOMC, Lisa Cook, Nvidia, stocks, trade craft, Trump | Leave a comment »
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
Once a physician [MD, DO, DPM or DDS] has a brokerage account, the young doctior will need to decide what to invest in. There are lots of options, and each comes with different benefits and drawbacks. Here are some of the most common options for new physician investors.
BROKE DOCTORS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/08/02/doctors-going-broke-and-living-paycheck-to-paycheck/
Stocks are the first thing most people think about when they are considering investing, but they are not the only option. The prices of stocks change daily, sometimes by large amounts, as the market adjusts to news and various cycles. For that reason, it’s important to do your research. If you’re just beginning with a retirement account, you could also consider the longer-term products listed below.
Index funds attempt to replicate the performance of an un-managed market index. The performance of mutual funds [open and closed] varies. You can often get involved for a lower initial investment, and they can provide good diversification, which makes your portfolio better equipped to handle market fluctuations [active and passive].
For that reason, many financial experts say they should form the core of your retirement portfolio. While they have many similar characteristics, there are important differences. Read more about some of the differences in index funds and mutual funds.
These technically aren’t investment products; they are a contract between you and an insurance company. However, they work to accomplish a similar goal. There are immediate annuities that convert some of your existing savings into lifetime payments, but if we’re talking about saving for retirement, a deferred income annuity is the closest comparison. You make premium payments into the deferred annuity on a regular or irregular basis depending on the contract terms, and when you reach retirement age, you annuitize those savings and receive payments for the rest of your life. They can make a valuable addition to a retirement savings strategy.
There are many other types of investments and financial vehicles: bonds [local, state or US], money market funds, certificates of deposit through a brokerage account or investment apps. Even the cash value of life insurance can play a part. They are all designed to address different needs and have benefits and drawbacks and may be important to your overall strategy.
***
***
Crypto-Currency.
Crypto.com is a cryptocurrency company based in Singapore that offers various financial services, including an app, exchange, and noncustodial DeFi wallet, NFT marketplace, and direct payment service in cryptocurrency. As of 2024, the company reportedly had more than 100 million customers and more than 4,000 employees.
CRYPTO CURRENCY: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/03/27/cryptocurrency-real-money-or-not/
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: Alternative Investments, bonds, crypto, crypto-currency, DDS, DeFi, DO, DPM, ETFs, finance, Index Funds, Investing, Marcinko, MD, Mutual Funds, NFT, personal-finance, retirement, stocks | Leave a comment »
By A.I and ME-P Staff Reporters
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", CMP Program, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Investing | Tagged: bond yields, bonds, CMP, coffee, commodities, DJIA, DOW, fed, Federal Reserve, gold, interest rates, oil, Powell, S&P 500, stocks | Leave a comment »
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, Information Technology, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: AI, fed, Federal Reserve, FOMC, Lisa Cook, MIT, NASDAQ, S&P 500, stocks, Technology, Trump | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
UnitedHealth Group soared almost 12%, its biggest one-day gain in nearly five years, after getting the “Buffett Bounce.” Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway revealed it bought ~5 million shares worth nearly $1.6 billion, giving a much-needed vote of confidence to the struggling health giant.
The White House is considering buying part of Intel, Bloomberg reported this week, which would be the latest big business deal the president pursues on behalf of the government. The Trump administration might acquire a stake in the struggling computer chip-maker using CHIPS Act funding—nearly $11 billion of which was already earmarked for Intel.
Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund took an $8 billion write-down on five mega-projects it’s building, due to lower oil prices and higher costs.
Pimco, the asset management giant, warned that President Trump’s plan to IPO Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could push mortgage rates higher.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", finance, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management | Tagged: Bloomberg, Buffett Bounce, david marcinko, Fannie Mae, financial advisors, Freddie Mac, Intel, IPO, PIMCO, Portfolio Management, Public Investment Fund, stocks, UnitedHealth Group | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", economics, finance, Glossary Terms, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: CATL, China, commodities, CPI, gold, Lithium, stocks, trade, Trump, Wall Street | Leave a comment »
By A.I. and Staff Reporters
***
***
President Trump is set to sign an executive order allowing alternative assets such as cryptocurrency, private equity investments, and real estate in 401(k) accounts. Those accounts are a veritable gold mine—Americans have stashed approximately $12.5 trillion away for retirement, and alternative asset managers have been chomping at the bit to get a piece of that pie.
WIND ENERGY: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2012/08/20/wind-energy-alternate-investments/
According to Brew Markets, the changes have been a long time coming. All the way back in his first term, Trump ordered the Labor Department to review how to incorporate private equity investments into retirement accounts, an effort that was later reversed under President Biden. This latest move expands beyond private equity, coinciding with Trump’s push to bring crypto mainstream.
REAL ESTATE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2013/09/10/financial-freedom-through-commercial-real-estate-education-and-investing/
Proponents argue that alternative assets in 401(k) accounts will enhance investment diversification and could provide retirees with greater profits. Detractors note that these assets are less liquid, less transparent, and generally more risky than investing retirement funds into publicly traded stocks and bonds.
HEDGE FUNDS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/07/09/hedge-funds-understanding-fees-and-costs/
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Alternative Investments, Experts Invited, finance, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: 401[k] accounts, alternative investment, antiques, Art, Biden, bonds, Brew Markets, CASH, crypto-currency, hedge funds, investment diversification, Private Equity, real estate, stocks, Trump, wind energy | Leave a comment »
Enter Artificial Intelligence and the “Robo-Advisors”
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MED CMP™
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
***
DIRECT TO INVESTOR ONLINE ADVISORY PLATFORMS
Since the financial crisis in 2008, several start-up companies from Silicon Valley and Boston [Learn Vest, Betterment, Financial Guard, Quovo, WealthFront, Nest Egg Wealth. Wealth-Front and Personal Capital] have emerged with the mantra that individual investors, younger and informed clients will receive portfolio strategies, financial advice and performance metrics directly from various internet and online advisory platforms. Termed “robo-advisors” by some, their existence heralds the doom of financial advisors; or at least drives down the value of Financial Advisory guidance; reduces fees and holds them more accountable to clients.
STOCK MARKET HELL: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/01/30/escaping-stock-market-double-hell/
On the other hand, detractors say the financial advice may not be as good because the personalization will not be there; but pricing fees will be more competitive, at least initially. Going forward price will get even lower and service better. And ultimately, as consumers get more information on line, product and service will improve and be delivered to them faster than thru traditional human channels of distribution. The era of quarterly client meetings with TAMPs is fading. Clients will have access to their portfolios; in real time, all the time.
A turnkey asset management program offers a fee-account technology platform that financial advisers, broker-dealers, insurance companies, banks, law firms, and CPA firms can use to oversee their clients’ investment accounts.
Turnkey asset management programs are designed to help financial professionals save time and allow them to focus on providing clients with service in their areas of expertise, which may not include asset management tasks like investment research and portfolio allocation. In other words, TAMPs let financial professionals and firms delegate asset management and research responsibilities to another party that specializes in those areas.
Conclusion
The growth of more traditional direct to investment platforms like E-Trade and Schwab has outpaced Financial Advisors and recently human advisors must have the technology and niche space specificity to survive in the future. Realistically, robo-advisors, Artificial Intelligence and traditional flesh-and-blood FAs will seamlessly merge into a hybrid platform indistinguishable to most all.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: finance, Investing, investment, personal-finance, stocks | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
***
Trade: President Trump signed an executive order late yesterday unleashing a wave of new tariffs on 69 US trading partners that will go into effect on August 7th. Here’s a handy list of tariffs and their economic effects for anyone else having trouble keeping track of all these new numbers.
Markets: Stocks opened lower and kept falling thanks to a double whammy of new tariff rates and a shocking slowdown in the labor market, while bond yields tumbled.
Commodities: Gold jumped as the likelihood of a rate cut rose due to the latest jobs report, while oil sank on reports that OPEC+ may announce a crude production boost as soon as this weekend.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: Contest Entrance, economics, finance | Tagged: bonds, CMP, export, gold, import, oil, OPEC, stocks, tariffs, trade, Trump | Leave a comment »
THE ESSENTIAL DOCUMENT
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
In order to create and monitor an investment portfolio for personal or institutional use, the physician executive, financial advisor, wealth manager, or healthcare institutional endowment fund manager, should ask three questions:
Introduction to the IPS
Most doctors, and hospital endowment fund executives, know how much money they have invested. If they don’t, they can add a few statements together to obtain a total. But, few can answers the questions above or actually know the rate of return achieved last year; or so far this year. Everyone can get this number by simply subtracting the ending balance from the beginning balance and dividing the difference. But, few take the time to do it. Why? A typical response to the question is, “We’re doing fine.”
POOR DOCTORS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/07/29/why-too-many-physician-colleagues-dont-get-rich/
Now, ask how much risk is in the portfolio and help is needed [risk adjusted rate of return]. In fact, Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz, Ph.D. said, “If you take more risk, you deserve more return.” Using standard deviation, he referred to the “variability of returns;” in other words, how much the portfolio goes up and down, its volatility [Markowitz, H: Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, March, 1952].
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Ask a Doctor, business, Experts Invited, Glossary Terms, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: finance, Investing, investment, Investment Advice, Investment Policy Statement, IPS, journal finance, Marcinko, Markowitz, personal-finance, portfolio, RARR, rate return, risk, stocks | Leave a comment »
MEDICAL EXECUTIVE-POST – TODAY’S NEWSLETTER BRIEFING
***
Essays, Opinions and Curated News in Health Economics, Investing, Business, Management and Financial Planning for Physician Entrepreneurs and their Savvy Advisors and Consultants
“Serving Almost One Million Doctors, Financial Advisors and Medical Management Consultants Daily“
A Partner of the Institute of Medical Business Advisors , Inc.
http://www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
SPONSORED BY: Marcinko & Associates, Inc.
***
http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
| Daily Update Provided By Staff Reporters Since 2007. How May We Serve You? |
| © Copyright Institute of Medical Business Advisors, Inc. All rights reserved. 2025 |
REFER A COLLEAGUE: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
SPONSORSHIPS AVAILABLE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/sponsors/
ADVERTISE ON THE ME-P: https://tinyurl.com/ytb5955z
Your Referral Count -0-
CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource
According to Bloomberg, 83% of the S&P 500 companies that have reported earnings have outpaced Wall Street’s estimates, putting the index on pace for its best season of beats since the second quarter of 2021.
CITE: https://tinyurl.com/tj8smmes
Visualize: How private equity tangled banks in a web of debt, from the Financial Times.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Thank You
***
***
***
***
EDUCATIONAL TEXTBOOKS: https://tinyurl.com/4zdxuuwf
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Alternative Investments, Experts Invited, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Information Technology, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management, Recommended Books | Tagged: Bloomberg, books, China, commodities, DJIA, DOW, EU, FTC, gold, Marcinko, NASA, NASDAQ, PBMs, S&P 500, stockholm, stocks, textbooks, trade, traiffs, Trump, US, VIX, wallstreet | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", business, CMP Program, economics, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Portfolio Management | Tagged: brazil, CMP, commodities, EU, European Union, gold, NASDAQ, oil, S&P 500, stocks, tariffs, Trump | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Alternative Investments, CMP Program, finance, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Healthcare Finance, Taxation | Tagged: bills, bonds, CMP, commodities, debt, EU, gold, japan, NASDAQ, oil, S&P 500, stocks, tariffs, tyreasury | Leave a comment »
MEDICAL EXECUTIVE-POST – TODAY’S NEWSLETTER BRIEFING
***
Essays, Opinions and Curated News in Health Economics, Investing, Business, Management and Financial Planning for Physician Entrepreneurs and their Savvy Advisors and Consultants
“Serving Almost One Million Doctors, Financial Advisors and Medical Management Consultants Daily“
A Partner of the Institute of Medical Business Advisors , Inc.
http://www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
SPONSORED BY: Marcinko & Associates, Inc.
***
http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
| Daily Update Provided By Staff Reporters Since 2007. How May We Serve You? |
| © Copyright Institute of Medical Business Advisors, Inc. All rights reserved. 2025 |
REFER A COLLEAGUE: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
SPONSORSHIPS AVAILABLE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/sponsors/
ADVERTISE ON THE ME-P: https://tinyurl.com/ytb5955z
Your Referral Count -0-
CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource
Insurers selling plans on ACA exchanges are expected to hike premiums next year as subsidies on them are set to expire, with the average person expected to be paying 75% more, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan research group KFF.
CITE: https://tinyurl.com/tj8smmes
Visualize: How private equity tangled banks in a web of debt, from the Financial Times.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
Thank You
***
***
***
***
EDUCATIONAL TEXTBOOKS: https://tinyurl.com/4zdxuuwf
***
Filed under: Drugs and Pharma, Ethics, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Information Technology, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Recommended Books, Sponsors, Taxation | Tagged: ACA, career, DOW, finance, Health Insurance, home-improvement, insurance, insurers, KFF, Marcinko, PBMs, PP-ACA, premiums, stock markets, stocks, SUBSIDIES, taxes | Leave a comment »
By A.I.
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", CMP Program, Financial Planning, Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: CMP, Coca-Cola, down stocks, DR Horton, Equifax, General Motors, GM, Grumman, medpace, RTX, stock markerts, stocks, up stocks | Leave a comment »
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
By A.I.
***
***
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Like and Refer
***
***
Filed under: "Doctors Only", Alternative Investments, CMP Program, finance, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Investing, Portfolio Management, Risk Management | Tagged: Bessent, China, deals, DJIA, DOW, El-Erian, NASDAQ, Powell, S&P 500, stocks, trade, Trump, US | Leave a comment »
The Leading Business Education Network for Doctors, Financial Advisors and Health Industry Consultants 