SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

Posted on November 20, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Shaping Well-being Beyond Medicine

Health is often thought of as the result of medical care, but in reality, it is deeply influenced by the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. These conditions, known as social determinants of health, include a wide range of social, economic, and environmental factors that shape health outcomes. They are responsible for many of the differences in health status between individuals and communities. Understanding these determinants is essential for promoting fairness in health and designing policies that reduce disparities.

Economic Stability

Economic stability is one of the most powerful determinants of health. Individuals with steady income can afford nutritious food, safe housing, and preventive healthcare. Conversely, poverty increases vulnerability to chronic diseases, mental health challenges, and limited access to medical services. Families with fewer financial resources may struggle to afford medications or healthy diets, leading to higher rates of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Unemployment or unstable work further exacerbates stress, which itself is linked to poor health outcomes. Economic inequality directly translates into health inequality.

Education

Education shapes health both directly and indirectly. Higher educational attainment is associated with better employment opportunities, higher income, and improved health literacy. People with more education are more likely to understand medical information, adopt healthy behaviors, and navigate healthcare systems effectively. Limited education can perpetuate cycles of poverty and poor health. For instance, children who grow up in underfunded schools may face restricted opportunities, leading to lower lifetime earnings and poorer health outcomes. Education is therefore a critical lever for breaking intergenerational cycles of disadvantage.

***

Neighborhood and Physical Environment

The environment in which individuals live plays a crucial role in determining health. Safe neighborhoods with clean air, accessible parks, and reliable transportation promote physical activity and reduce exposure to pollutants. In contrast, communities with high crime rates, poor housing, and environmental hazards contribute to stress, injury, and illness. Food deserts—areas with limited access to affordable, healthy food—are a striking example of how environment shapes health. Residents in these areas often rely on processed foods, increasing risks of obesity and related diseases. Housing quality also matters: overcrowding, mold, or lead exposure can lead to respiratory illnesses and developmental delays.

Healthcare Access and Quality

Access to healthcare is a fundamental determinant, but it is shaped by social and economic factors. Insurance coverage, affordability, and cultural competence of providers influence whether individuals receive timely and effective care. Marginalized groups often face barriers such as discrimination, language differences, or lack of nearby facilities. Even when healthcare is available, disparities in quality persist. For example, minority populations may receive less aggressive treatment for certain conditions compared to others. Addressing these inequities requires systemic reforms that prioritize inclusivity and affordability.

Social and Community Context

Social relationships and community support networks significantly affect health. Strong social ties provide emotional support, reduce stress, and encourage healthy behaviors. Communities with high levels of trust and civic engagement often experience better health outcomes. Conversely, discrimination, racism, and social exclusion undermine health by increasing stress and limiting opportunities. Social cohesion and equity are therefore vital for fostering healthier societies.

Conclusion

The social determinants of health highlight that medicine alone cannot ensure well-being. Economic stability, education, environment, healthcare access, and social context collectively shape health outcomes and drive disparities. Addressing these determinants requires a holistic approach that integrates public health, social policy, and community action. By investing in education, reducing poverty, improving neighborhoods, and ensuring equitable healthcare, societies can move closer to achieving health equity. Ultimately, health is not just about treating illness—it is about creating conditions in which everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Quality Initiatives, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: david marcinko, Ethics, health, healthcare, mental health, Population Health, public health, SDH, social determinants health, wellness | Leave a comment »

CRISIS MANAGEMENT: In Medical Practice and Healthcare

Posted on November 16, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Crisis Management in Medical Practice

Healthcare is a field where crises are not hypothetical but expected realities. From pandemics and natural disasters to cyberattacks and sudden staff shortages, medical practices must be prepared to respond swiftly and effectively. Crisis management in medical practice refers to the structured approach of anticipating, preparing for, responding to, and recovering from disruptive events that threaten patient safety, organizational stability, or community trust.

🌐 Nature of Crises in Healthcare

Crises in medical practice can take many forms:

Public Health Emergencies: Outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, demand rapid adaptation of protocols and resources.
Operational Disruptions: Power outages, supply chain breakdowns, or IT failures can halt essential services.
Human Resource Challenges: Sudden staff shortages due to illness or burnout can compromise patient care.
Reputation and Legal Risks: Medical errors or breaches of patient confidentiality can escalate into crises requiring immediate management.

Each type of crisis requires tailored strategies, but all share the common need for preparedness and resilience.

🔑 Principles of Crisis Management

Effective crisis management in medical practice rests on several key principles:

Preparedness: Developing contingency plans, conducting drills, and maintaining emergency supplies ensure readiness.
Leadership and Decision-Making: Strong leadership is critical for making rapid, evidence-based decisions under pressure.
Communication: Transparent, timely communication with staff, patients, and external stakeholders reduces panic and builds trust.
Collaboration: Coordinating with hospitals, public health agencies, and community organizations strengthens response capacity.
Flexibility: Crises are unpredictable; adaptability in protocols and resource allocation is essential.

⚙️ Crisis Management Frameworks

Healthcare organizations often adopt structured frameworks:

Incident Command System (ICS): Provides a standardized hierarchy for managing emergencies.
Risk Assessment Models: Identify vulnerabilities and prioritize mitigation strategies.
Business Continuity Planning: Ensures essential services continue despite disruptions.

These frameworks help medical practices move from reactive responses to proactive resilience.

***

💡 Challenges in Crisis Management

Despite planning, medical practices face significant challenges:

Resource Limitations: Smaller practices may lack the financial or logistical capacity to implement robust crisis plans.
Staff Stress and Burnout: Crises often demand long hours and emotional resilience, which can strain healthcare workers.
Rapidly Changing Information: In public health emergencies, evolving guidelines can create confusion.
Patient Expectations: Maintaining quality care during disruptions is difficult but essential to preserve trust.

Addressing these challenges requires investment in training, mental health support, and technology infrastructure.

🌱 Importance of Resilience

Crisis management is not only about survival but about building resilience. Practices that learn from crises, adapt policies, and strengthen systems emerge stronger. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telemedicine adoption, which continues to benefit patients today. Resilience ensures that medical practices can withstand future disruptions while continuing to deliver safe, effective care.

✅ Conclusion

Crisis management in medical practice is a vital competency that safeguards both patients and providers. By preparing for diverse scenarios, fostering strong leadership, and prioritizing communication, healthcare organizations can navigate crises with confidence. Ultimately, effective crisis management transforms challenges into opportunities for growth, innovation, and improved patient care.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", "Doctors Only", Drugs and Pharma, Ethics, Glossary Terms, Management, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: crisis, crisis management, crisis management healthcare, crisis management meicine, david marcinko, digital marketing, health, healthcare, ICs, Incident Command System, public health, reputation management | Leave a comment »

RICARDIAN ECONOMICS: Can it Save Medicine?

Posted on November 10, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Ricardian economics, rooted in the theories of 19th-century economist David Ricardo, emphasizes comparative advantage, free trade, and the neutrality of government debt—most notably through the concept of Ricardian equivalence. While these ideas have shaped macroeconomic thought, their relevance to medicine and healthcare policy is less direct. Still, exploring Ricardian principles offers a provocative lens through which to examine the fiscal sustainability and efficiency of modern healthcare systems.

At the heart of Ricardian equivalence is the idea that consumers are forward-looking and internalize government budget constraints. If a government finances healthcare through debt rather than taxes, rational agents will anticipate future tax burdens and adjust their behavior accordingly. In theory, this undermines the effectiveness of deficit-financed healthcare spending as a stimulus. Applied to medicine, this suggests that long-term fiscal responsibility is crucial: expanding healthcare access through borrowing may not yield the intended economic or health benefits if citizens expect future costs to rise.

This insight could inform debates on healthcare reform, especially in countries grappling with ballooning medical expenditures. Ricardian economics warns against short-term fixes that ignore long-term fiscal implications. For example, expanding public insurance programs without sustainable funding mechanisms could lead to intergenerational inequities and economic distortions. Policymakers might instead focus on reforms that align incentives, reduce waste, and promote cost-effective care—principles that resonate with Ricardo’s emphasis on efficiency and comparative advantage.

***

However, Ricardian economics offers limited guidance on the unique moral and practical dimensions of medicine. Healthcare is not a typical market good. Patients often lack the information or autonomy to make rational choices, especially in emergencies. Moreover, the sector is rife with externalities: one person’s vaccination benefits the broader community, and untreated illness can strain public resources. These complexities challenge the assumption of rational, forward-looking behavior central to Ricardian equivalence.

Additionally, Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage—where nations benefit by specializing in goods they produce most efficiently—has implications for global health. It supports international collaboration in pharmaceutical production, medical research, and telemedicine. Yet, over-reliance on global supply chains can expose vulnerabilities, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic when countries faced shortages of critical medical supplies.

In conclusion, Ricardian economics provides valuable fiscal insights that can inform healthcare policy, particularly regarding debt sustainability and efficient resource allocation. Its emphasis on long-term planning and comparative advantage can guide reforms that make medicine more resilient and cost-effective. However, the theory’s assumptions about rational behavior and market dynamics limit its applicability to the nuanced realities of healthcare. Medicine requires not just economic efficiency but ethical considerations, equity, and compassion—areas where Ricardian economics falls short. Thus, while it can contribute to the conversation, it cannot “save” medicine alone.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Ask a Doctor, economics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Healthcare Finance, Insurance Matters | Tagged: david marcinko, david ricardo, DO, doctors, DPM, economics, economy, finance, healthcare, macro-economics, MD, medicine, Population Health, public health, Ricardian economics | Leave a comment »

HEALTH: Public V. Population

Posted on October 21, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Population health and public health are two interrelated disciplines that strive to enhance the health outcomes of communities. While they share a common mission—to reduce health disparities and promote wellness—their approaches, target populations, and operational frameworks differ significantly.

***

Public health is traditionally defined as the science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life, and promoting health through organized efforts and informed choices of society, organizations, public and private sectors, communities, and individuals. It focuses on the health of the general population and emphasizes broad interventions such as vaccination programs, sanitation, health education, and policy advocacy. Public health professionals often work in government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and academic institutions to implement community-wide initiatives that prevent disease and promote healthy behaviors.

***

In contrast, population health takes a more targeted approach. It refers to the health outcomes of a specific group of individuals, including the distribution of such outcomes within the group. This field is particularly concerned with the social determinants of health—factors like income, education, environment, and access to care—that influence health disparities. Population health strategies often involve data-driven interventions tailored to the needs of defined groups, such as rural communities, ethnic minorities, or patients with chronic conditions.

One key distinction lies in scope and granularity. Public health initiatives are typically designed for the entire population, aiming to create systemic change. For example, anti-smoking campaigns or water fluoridation programs benefit everyone regardless of individual risk. Population health, however, might focus on reducing diabetes rates among Hispanic adults in a specific urban area, using targeted outreach and culturally sensitive care models.

Another difference is in data utilization. Population health relies heavily on health informatics and analytics to identify trends, allocate resources, and evaluate outcomes. This evidence-based approach supports precision in addressing health inequities. Public health also uses data, but often at a broader level to guide policy and monitor general health indicators like life expectancy or disease prevalence.

Despite these differences, the two fields are complementary. Public health lays the foundation for healthy societies through preventive infrastructure, while population health builds on this by addressing nuanced needs within subgroups. Together, they form a holistic framework for improving health outcomes across diverse communities.

In today’s healthcare landscape, the integration of public and population health is increasingly vital. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of both approaches: public health measures like mask mandates and vaccination campaigns were essential, while population health efforts ensured vulnerable groups received targeted support.

In conclusion, while public health and population health differ in focus and methodology, they are united by a shared goal: to foster healthier communities. Understanding their distinctions enables more effective collaboration and innovation in health policy, care delivery, and community engagement.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: ME-P Editor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, CMP Program, economics, finance, Health Insurance, Healthcare Finance, Information Technology, Marcinko Associates, mental health | Tagged: CMP, covid, david marcinko, health, HIT, IT, mental health, Population Health, public health, self-improvement | Leave a comment »

DAILY UPDATE: Big Pharma Payouts as Stock Markets Eke Out Rise

Posted on July 15, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

MEDICAL EXECUTIVE-POST – TODAY’S NEWSLETTER BRIEFING

***

Essays, Opinions and Curated News in Health Economics, Investing, Business, Management and Financial Planning for Physician Entrepreneurs and their Savvy Advisors and Consultants

“Serving Almost One Million Doctors, Financial Advisors and Medical Management Consultants Daily“

A Partner of the Institute of Medical Business Advisors , Inc.

http://www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com

SPONSORED BY: Marcinko & Associates, Inc.

***

http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Daily Update Provided By Staff Reporters Since 2007.
How May We Serve You?

REFER A COLLEAGUE: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com

SPONSORSHIPS AVAILABLE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/sponsors/

ADVERTISE ON THE ME-P: https://tinyurl.com/ytb5955z

Your Referral Count -0-

***

CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource

Drug and medical device companies paid at least $13.2 billion to medical professionals in 2024, according to CMS data released June 30th. There’s been steady growth in these payments over the last few years, which include everything from research payments to free meals to promotional or conference fees. Drug and medical device companies paid out $13.1 billion in 2023, $13.1 in 2022, and $12.6 in 2021. If you’re a medical provider, you’ve probably gotten one of those perks from a drug or medical device company and thought it wouldn’t affect your decision-making.

But research suggests physicians are more likely to prescribe drugs from companies that pay them, with some studies specifically associating this with drugs that are costlier to patients. “Really well-trained people who affirm an oath to do no harm can be influenced, and are,” Neil Jay Sehgal, associate professor of health systems and population health at the University of Washington School of Public Health, told Healthcare Brew.

CITE: https://tinyurl.com/2h47urt5

Stocks Up

Bitcoin is booming, and crypto stocks climbed along with it. MicroStrategy rose 3.86%, Robinhood Markets added 1.67%. and Coinbase gained 1.80%.
Boeing rose 1.64% on preliminary reports that investigators have found no evidence of malfunction in the plane that crashed in India last month. Engine-maker GE Aerospace also gained 2.71%.
Warner Bros Discovery climbed 2.39% thanks to a strong opening weekend for the new Superman movie.
Autodesk popped 5.05% on the news that it is not pursuing an acquisition of rival software maker PTC. PTC fell 1.25%.
Kenvue, the company behind Band Aids and Listerine, gained 2.18% after kicking its CEO to the curb.
PayPal climbed 3.55% despite the news that JPMorgan will start charging the fintech fees for access to customer data.

Stocks Down

Starbucks sank 1.60% on news that employees will have to return to the office four days a week. Shareholders were also unimpressed with the coffee giant’s new secret menu.
Synopsys stumbled 1.74% after getting regulatory approval from Chinese authorities to acquire software designer Ansys for $35 billion. Ansys rose 3.03% on the news.
Waters plunged 13.81% on the news that it will merge with Becton Dickinson’s bioscience and diagnostic solutions business in a $17.5 billion deal.
Rivian Automotive lost 2.15% thanks to a downgrade from Guggenheim analysts, who forecast soft sales for the automaker’s latest models.

CITE: https://tinyurl.com/tj8smmes

Visualize: How private equity tangled banks in a web of debt, from the Financial Times.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com

Thank You

***

EDUCATIONAL TEXTBOOKS: https://tinyurl.com/4zdxuuwf

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Ask a Doctor, Career Development, Drugs and Pharma, Ethics, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Information Technology, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Portfolio Management, Recommended Books, Sponsors | Tagged: CMS, DJIA, DOW, Drugs, health, Healthcare Brew., Marcinko, Medical Devices, medicine, NASDAQ, Neil Jay Sehgal, PBMs, public health, S&P 500, textbooks, TNX, University Washington, VIX | Leave a comment »

Gerontologist V. Geriatrician?

Posted on July 9, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Career Development, CMP Program, Experts Invited, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, LifeStyle, mental health | Tagged: aging, American Geriatric Society, CMP, geriatrician, gerontologist, health, healthcare, Joyce Sjoberg, mental health, public health, wellness | Comments Off on Gerontologist V. Geriatrician?

DAILY UPDATE: Obesity, Three Mile Island and Medical Records as Stocks Crash

Posted on October 8, 2024 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

MEDICAL EXECUTIVE-POST – TODAY’S NEWSLETTER BRIEFING

***

Essays, Opinions and Curated News in Health Economics, Investing, Business, Management and Financial Planning for Physician Entrepreneurs and their Savvy Advisors and Consultants

“Serving Almost One Million Doctors, Financial Advisors and Medical Management Consultants Daily“

A Partner of the Institute of Medical Business Advisors , Inc.

http://www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com

SPONSORED BY: Marcinko & Associates, Inc.

***

http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Daily Update Provided By Staff Reporters Since 2007.
How May We Serve You?

REFER A COLLEAGUE: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

SPONSORSHIPS AVAILABLE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/sponsors/

ADVERTISE ON THE ME-P: https://tinyurl.com/ytb5955z

Your Referral Count -0-

In a public health milestone, the US adult obesity rate stopped its long climb and dropped by roughly two percentage points between 2020 and 2023, according to new data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

In 2024, about 62% of clinicians reported that “excessive documentation requirements” is a leading cause of burnout, according to Athenahealth, a health tech and electronic health record (EHR) company. The American Medical Association reported in January that primary care physicians, for example, can spend up to 45.7 minutes on medical record documentation for every 30-minute appointment.

CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource

What’s up

Scholar Rock shares quadrupled (yes, you read that right) 361.99% after its spinal muscular atrophy drug apitegromab provided a dramatic improvement for patients in a late-stage clinical trial.
Super Micro Computer surged 15.79% after the semiconductor company announced it shipped over 100,000 GPUs last quarter, highlighting strong data center demand.
Generac Holdings makes generators, so it’s no wonder that the stock popped 8.54% thanks to huge demand for back-up power from areas hit by Hurricane Helene and places preparing to deal with Hurricane Milton.
Arcadium Lithium skyrocketed 35.39% after it announced that Rio Tinto has approached the lithium miner about an acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals rose 9.53% after CNBC reported that activist investor Mantle Ridge has taken a $1 billion stake in the industrial gas supplier. Activist investors are clearly getting more active these days.

What’s down

Netflix sank 2.47% thanks to a downgrade from Barclays analysts worried that the streaming service’s revenues will slow in the coming months. That outweighed an upgrade from Piper Sandler analysts, who think the streamer’s high valuation is warranted.
In another big tech downgrade, Wells Fargo analysts downgraded Amazon due to multiple headwinds like competition from Walmart and lower advertising revenue. Shares sank 3.06%.
Back-to-back hurricanes hitting the South are pummeling insurance stocks like Universal Insurance (down 19.60%), Allstate (down 4.90%) Travelers Companies (down 4.34%) and Chubb (down 4.61%).
Garmin tumbled 4.06% on a downgrade from Morgan Stanley analysts, who think the device-maker’s revenue will decline and margins will shrink in the coming quarters.