Concerning Periodic Measurements and Meters
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA, CMP™
[Publisher-in-Chief]
The stock market has been booming lately; flirting with DJIA 12,000. Up almost 100% since March 2009, after being down almost 50%. And so, perhaps this is a good time to [re]-evaluate the performance of your investment portfolio[s]. But how?
Performance measurement has an important role in monitoring progress towards any physician’s portfolio’s goals. The portfolio’s objective may be to preserve the purchasing power of the assets by achieving returns above inflation or to have total returns adequate to satisfy an annual spending need without eroding original capital, etc. Whatever the absolute goal, performance numbers need to be evaluated based on an understanding of the market environment over the period being measured.
Time Weighted Return
One way to put a portfolio’s a time-weighted return in the context of the overall market environment is to compare the performance to relevant alternative investment vehicles. This can be done through comparisons to either market indices, which are board baskets of investable securities, or peer groups, which are collections of returns from managers or funds investing in a similar universe of securities with similar objectives as the portfolio. By evaluating the performance of alternatives that were available over the period, the physician investor and his/her advisor are able to gain insight to the general investment environment over the time period.
The Indices
Market indices are frequently used to gain perspective on the market environment and to evaluate how well the portfolio performed relative to that environment. Market indices are typically segmented into different asset classes.
Common stock market indices include the following:
- Dow Jones Industrial Average- a price-weighted index of 30 large U.S. corporations.
- Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index – a capitalization-weighted index of 500 large U.S. corporations.
- Value Line Index – an equally-weighted index of 1700 large U.S. corporations.
- Russell 2000 – a capitalization-weighted index of smaller capitalization U.S. companies.
- Wilshire 5000 – a cap weighted index of the 5000 largest U.S. corporations.
- Morgan Stanley Europe Australia, Far East (EAFE) Index – a capitalization-weighted index of the stocks traded in developed economies.
Common bond market indices include the following:
- Lehman Brothers Government Credit Index – an index of investment grade domestic bonds excluding mortgages [N/A].
- Lehman Brothers Aggregate Index – the LBGCI plus investment grade mortgages [N/A].
- Solomon Brothers Bond Index – similar in construction to the LBAI.
- Merrill Lynch High Yield Index – an index of below investment grade bonds.
- JP Morgan Global Government Bond – an index of domestic and foreign government-issued fixed income securities.
The selection of an appropriate market index depends on the goals of the portfolio and the universe of securities from which the portfolio was selected. Just as a portfolio with a short-time horizon and a primary goal of capital preservation should not be expected to perform in line with the S&P 500, a portfolio with a long-term horizon and a primary goal of capital growth should not be evaluated versus Treasury Bills.
While the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 are often quoted in the newspapers, there are clearly broader market indices available to describe the overall performance of the U.S. stock market. Likewise, indices like the S&P 500 and Wilshire 5000 are capitalization-weighted, so their returns are generally dominated by the largest 50 of their 500 – 5000 stocks. While this capitalization-bias does not typically affect long-term performance comparisons, there may be periods of time in which large cap stocks out- or under-perform mid-to-small cap stocks, thus creating a bias when cap-weighted indices are used versus what is usually non-cap weighted strategies of managers or mutual funds.
Finally, the fixed income indices tend to have a bias towards intermediate-term securities versus longer-term bonds. Thus, an investor with a long-term time horizon, and therefore potentially a higher allocation to long bonds, should keep this bias in mind when evaluating performance.
Assessment
RIP: Lehman Brothers
Peer group comparisons tend to avoid the capitalization-bias of many market indices, although identifying an appropriate peer group is as difficult as identifying an appropriate market index. Further, peer group universes will tend to have an additional problem of survivorship bias, which is the loss of (generally weaker) performance track records from the database. This is the greatest concern with databases used for marketing purposes by managers, since investment products in these generally self-disclosure databases will be added when a track record looks good and dropped when the product’s returns falter. Whether mutual funds or managers, the potential for survivorship bias and inappropriate manager universes make it important to evaluate the details of how a database is constructed before using it for relative performance comparisons.
Conclusion
And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com and http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:
Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752
Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790
Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421
Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com
Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com
Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.
Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise
Filed under: Investing, Portfolio Management | Tagged: david marcinko, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Investing, Portfolio Management, Russell 2000, Standard & Poor’s, stock market indices, Time Weighted Investment Returns, Value Line Index, Wilshire 5000 | 5 Comments »
Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds.
THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
The Leading Business Education Network for Doctors, Financial Advisors and Health Industry Consultants 