Avoiding an IRS Appraisal Audit

Valued Friends and Colleagues

By Linda Trugman; CPA, CVAtrugman-logo

We hope this e-mail post finds you well. We have attached our most recent newsletter “Valuation Trends” for your perusal and hope you find something of interest in it; especially “20 Ways to Avoid an IRS Appraisal Audit.”

Link: trugman-valuation

Assessment

As a reminder, our updated website at www.trugmanvaluation.com includes a resource center which provides additional information that might be useful to you including sample reports, various conference presentations and podcasts.

Conclusion

We are available to assist you, and your clients, with your valuation and litigation support needs and look forward to hearing from you. And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Meet Dr. Gary L. Bode CPA MSA CMP™ [Hon]

Join Our Mailing List

Introducing our Newest Thought-Leader

Dr. Gary Bode; CPA, MSA, CMP

[By Ann Miller RN MHA]

The Medical Executive-Post is proud to introduce Dr. Gary L. Bode as our newest thought-leader for healthcare financial modernity. Dr. Bode was the Chief Financial Officer [CFO] for a private mental healthcare facility, and previously the Chief Executive Officer [CEO] of Comprehensive Practice Accounting, Inc, in Wilmington, NC. The firm specialized in providing tax solution to medical professionals. Dr. Bode was a board certified practitioner and managing partner of a multi-office medical group practice for a decade before earning his Master’s of Science degree in Accounting [MSA] from the University of North Carolina. He is a nationally known forensic health accountant, financial author, educator and speaker.

A Multi-Faceted Healthcare Financial Expert

Areas of expertise include producing customized managerial accounting reports, practice appraisals and valuations, restructurings and innovative financial accounting, as well as proactive tax positioning and tax return preparation for healthcare facilities. Currently, Dr. Bode is Chief Accounting and Valuation Officer (CAVO) for the Institute of Medical Business Advisors, Inc. He is also a Certified Medical Planner™ http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org  He provides litigation support in his areas of expertise and has been previously accepted as a legal expert witness www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com

Assessment

Gary has promised to publish his most exciting ideas and innovative work on our blog. He is also available for private consulting engagements and related professional work on an ad-hoc, or interim basis. So, let’s give a warm ME-P “shout-out” to Dr. Gary L Bode; our newest thought-leader.   

Channel Surfing the ME-P

Have you visited our other topic channels? Established to facilitate idea exchange and link our community together, the value of these topics is dependent upon your input. Please take a minute to visit. And, to prevent that annoying spam, we ask that you register. It is fast, free and secure.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

About FDIC.gov

What it is – How it works

Staff Reporters

handcuffsThe Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) preserves and promotes public confidence in the US financial system by insuring deposits in banks and thrift institutions for up to $250,000 (through December 31, 2009); and by identifying, monitoring and addressing risks to the deposit insurance funds; and by limiting the effect on the economy and the financial system when a bank or thrift institution fails

Mission

The FDIC is an independent agency created by the Congress that maintains the stability and public confidence in the nation’s financial system by insuring deposits, examining and supervising financial institutions, and managing receiverships.

Vision

The FDIC is a leader in developing and implementing sound public policies, identifying and addressing new and existing risks in the nation’s financial system, and effectively and efficiently carrying out its insurance, supervisory, and receivership management responsibilities.

The Website

The website www.FDIC.gov has these tabs-of-interest:

  • Deposit Insurance
  • Consumer Protections
  • Industry Analysis and Analysis
  • Regulations and Examinations
  • Failed Bank Information
  • Institutional Asset Sales
  • Breaking News and Events

Assessment

This site is an excellent resource for physicians, financial advisors, medical executives and all investors in this time of national economic crisis:

For more information:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Consumer Response Center
2345 Grand Boulevard, Suite 100
Kansas City, MO 64108-2638
Fax Number (703) 812-1020

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Physician Retirement Threats and Opportunities

Investing Vehicle Updates for Modernity

By Steven Podnos; MD, MBA, CFP®

coins

Most physicians count on their retirement plans for the bulk of their financial security. Yet, few of us understand the intricate workings of these plans, and are therefore misled or at the least miss out on a number of cost savings and benefits. Here are some examples to consider, especially during this time of financial upheaval:

1. Jim L, an endocrinologist in private practice, works with his wife as office manager and has four other employees.  Jim had a “free” prototype profit sharing plan with a well known brokerage and has been putting 15% of his total employee compensation away every year in order to fund about $35,000 dollars a year into his own plan.  He pays his wife $60,000 dollars a year in order to get a $9,000 dollar annual contribution for her, but at a social security cost of the same $9,000 dollars.  His plan is invested in a variety of “loaded” mutual funds and stocks at the brokerage, and he was not really sure how it was doing in terms of performance.

Change:

The plan was changed to a customized 401k/profit sharing plan using a Third Party Administrator at a cost of 2500 dollars.  Jim’s wife lowered her salary to $20,000 dollars, which saved over $5,000 dollars a year in social security taxes.  Yet Jim and his wife were now able to contribute over $65,000 dollars in pretax money (rather than $44,000 dollars in prior years.  His employee cost for the plan dropped from 15% of a $100,000dollar payroll to 6%, another annual savings of $9,000 dollars. 

2. Statewide Healthcare medical group had an insurance based “retirement” plan.  All of the investments allowed were wrapped in variable annuity/insurance wrappers with an annual expense ratio of between 2 and 4% annually. The plan was “free” to the group but did not allow any differentiation in benefits or contributions between the physicians and their employees

Change:

An unbundled 401k/profit sharing plan was designed that allowed physicians to contribute the maximum in salary deferral and profit sharing contributions. Using an age-weighted contribution formula, the physicians were able to put away 14% of their salary in the profit sharing plan as compared with a 5% contribution for employees.  The new investment portfolios carried an annual cost well below 1% annually and were actively monitored by a fee only fiduciary advisor, mostly relieving the group from the fiduciary responsibility for the fund investments.

3. Kirk L, an orthopedic surgeon employed his wife and 5 employees in a busy practice.  He is 55 years of age and looking towards retirement in ten years.  He had a reasonably well designed 401k/profit sharing plan advisor which let him and his wife put away about 70-75 thousand dollars a year with an employee cost of about 15 thousand dollars. He was beginning to worry about not having enough savings to make his retirement goal.

Change:

Kirk and two of his younger employees were switched to a new Defined Benefit plan, but also continued in the 401k salary deferral plan. Kirk’s wife and the remaining employees stayed in the old plan and his wife’s salary was reduced to lower Social Security costs.  With the new plan, Kirk and his wife are now putting away about $200,000 dollars in pretax contributions annually at a marginally higher cost for the employees.

Poorly Designed Retirement Plans

None of these stories are unusual, in fact they are typical.  Most physician retirement plans are poorly designed, expensive and misunderstood.  Few existing plans are updated to capture the many positive changes made in tax law over the last decade.  Many plans are shoddily designed to catch the “quick” dollar, with financially terrible consequences to the physicians.

Qualified Plans

And so, I’ll review the most common types of retirement plans available to medical practices and discuss the pros, cons and specific opportunities each type for most practices. Note that most of these plans are considered “qualified” plans by the US Government.  Being qualified means that contributions to the plans are allowed to be deducted as business expenses and that the plan assets are generally protected from creditors.  In exchange, the government requires extensive paperwork and mandatory contributions for employees on the lower end of the salary scale. 

1. SEP-IRA

The SEP-IRA allows a fixed percentage of salary (up to 25% of W2 income) to be contributed to individual IRAs of most employees (including the physicians). There can be no discrimination in what percentage of compensation is used between owner/managers and lower paid employees, making this a relatively expensive plan in terms of employee funding. There is no component of salary deferral by employees, and all plan funding is immediately “vested” (belongs to the employee immediately if they leave employment).

The advantages of the SEP plan include a minimum of paperwork and ease of setup. Generally, SEP-IRA plans are used by small family owned businesses with few to no outside employees. It does work well for physicians that act as Independent Contractors (no employees) such as many Emergency Room physicians.  However, an individual contractor with an income of less than around $170,000 dollars can actually put more pre-tax money away in a Self-Employed 401k plan.

2. SIMPLE-IRA

This plan is another relatively easy one to set up and administer. It allows companies that have less than 100 employees to open individual IRA accounts for employees. The employees may defer salary in amounts of $10,500-$13,000 (depending on age), and the employer supplies a “match.” All money in the plan is immediately vested. The match is generally (but not always) a dollar for dollar matching contribution of up to 3% of the employee’s compensation.

For example, a company owner with a compensation of 100,000 dollars would be able to defer salary in an amount of up to $13,000 (if age 50 or older), and then have the company “match” 3% or $3,000 more. A SIMPLE IRA plan is a good choice for small businesses in which the owners are highly compensated, and few employees wish to defer salary. The disadvantages of the SIMPLE-IRA are immediate vesting for the matched funds, and relatively low total amounts of contributions compared to other qualified plans. 

NOTE:

I have seen these plans work well in small practices that wish to avoid paperwork, have few to no employees that wish to defer salary, and who don’t mind the limited ability to make contributions.  Note one unusual feature of this plan, in that the 3% match has no limits. I have seen one physician with a small group of employees and an income of $600,000 dollars per year put away 13,000 in salary deferrals and another ($600K X 3%) 18K in the match at no employee cost!

3. 401k/PROFIT SHARING PLAN

This is by far the most common type of qualified plan in existence.  These plans actually have three components:

 

a)       401k salary deferral-In 2008, employees may defer between 15,500 and 20,500 dollars. This money and earnings on it are not subject to Federal income tax until withdrawn in retirement, and are immediately vested.

b)       A “match”-this is an optional part of the plan in which an employer may offer to contribute a matching amount of dollars to give employees an incentive to participate.  Matching funds are usually subject to vesting on a time schedule.

c)       Profit sharing-like the match, this is a discretionary contribution by the employer of up to 25% of payroll and usually subject to vesting.

 

It is crucial to have a skilled plan designer customize a 401K plan for your individual practice.  The most common abuse of these plans is the use of “cookie cutter” prototype plans used by brokerages and insurance companies. These prototype plans are for the convenience and profit of the person “selling” the plan, and are a solid negative for the practice. Customization allows the physicians to have maximal participation at the lowest employee cost.

There is also a self employed 401k option for small practices that have no full time employees other than the physician and spouse. They operate in much the same way, but with little expense and much less paperwork.

4. DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN

Once common, these plans are now rarely used by most companies. They are based completely on company contributions to a fund (no salary deferral) that are actuarially designed to produce a set benefit amount at retirement. All the risk for providing the promised benefit is the responsibility of the employer, which is an advantage when the major beneficiary is the physician. Defined Benefit plans work best for practices in which the physician/employee ratio is low and the physician(s) is approaching age 50 or older. The advantage of this plan is allowing much higher contributions on a pretax basis, with the disadvantage of higher administrative costs. These plans work extremely well for high income businesses employing one individual (plus or minus a spouse) who is nearing age 50 or over. However, physician practices that employ a spouse or physicians of different ages can often use a Defined Benefit Plan in conjunction with a 401k/profit sharing plan to great benefit as in example three.

Assessment

Doctors have a tremendous opportunity to review and enhance the retirement plan options. Although the article focuses on these medical professionals and related occupations, much of the material applies to other professional and business clients.  A relationship with a good Third Party Administrator [TPA] and some independent study are invaluable to your ability to perform this function well.

Conclusion

Dr. Podnos is a fee-only financial planner and the author of “Building and Preserving Your Wealth, A Practical Guide to Financial Planning for Affluent Investors” (available at Amazon.com and bookstores). He can be reached at Steven@wealthcarellc.com And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Proposed Disallowance of Fair Market Value for FLPs

On the HR 436 Proposal for FLPs

By Linda Trugman; CPAtrugman, MBA, ABV, ASA, MCBA

On January 9, 2009 the US House of Representatives introduced HR 436. The Bill would establish the federal estate tax exemption at $3,500,000, and set the tax rate for estates exceeding that amount at 45 percent, eliminating the currently scheduled 2010 phase-out and subsequent reversion to pre-Bush tax cut levels with the $1 million exclusion and a 55 percent tax rate.

Estate Planning Technique Elimination

Importantly, the Bill, if enacted as proposed, would remove a popular estate planning technique by eliminating most discounts associated with what is referred to generically as family limited partnerships [FLPs, a general term applied to closely held asset holding companies often holding non-business assets].

FLP Non-Controlling Interests

Currently, when a physician-investor or any other individual transfers a non-controlling interest in a FLP, whether by gift or at death, the interest is valued at the price that a willing buyer would pay for the partnership interest, or fair market value. Since such FLP interests are not publicly traded, and do not represent a controlling interest in the partnership, business appraisers often assign substantial discounts in valuing these interests.

Case Model:

For example, a 10 percent limited partnership interest in a partnership that holds $1 million worth of securities would not be valued at $100,000 under current law. Rather, because a buyer of the partnership interest cannot sell the interest on the open market, nor exert control prerogatives on the partnership, he or she would pay materially less for the interest [perhaps 30 percent to 50 percent less]. 

Elimination of FMV Standards

The Bill as drafted would be effective for transfers occurring after the date of enactment. However, there is always the possibility that any final statute might be applied retroactively. While the fate of this piece of legislation is uncertain, it may reflect the attitude of the new administration towards keeping and strengthening the estate tax. 

If HR 436 becomes law, appraisers would no longer be allowed to apply Fair Market Value standards to valuing these non-control FLP interests; they would not be able to apply any discounts to “non-business” assets held by partnerships or other entities. Instead, those assets would be valued as though they were transferred directly to the recipient. 

Assessment

The Bill as drafted would be effective for transfers occurring after the date of enactment. However, there is always the possibility that any final statute might be applied retroactively. While the fate of this piece of legislation is uncertain, it may reflect the attitude of the new administration towards keeping and strengthening the estate tax. I have attached the proposed legislation to this post.

File:  hr-436 

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

RIA Merger Mania and the Medical PPMC Fiasco

What is Old is New Again -or- Lessons Learned

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™

 dr-david-marcinko9According to the article Great Expectations-Disappointing Realities that recently appeared in Registered Representative, a trade magazine for the financial services industry, by John Churchill, the booming stock market of the last five years saw many Registered Investment Advisory [RIA] firms sell a portion of their future cash flows in return for cash and stock in an acquiring consolidating firm. This is known as a roll-up, or consolidator, business model. I am quite familiar with it, as both a doctor and financial advisor. I believe my dual perspective of both camps is somewhat unique, as well.

The NYSE Collapse

As the stock market collapsed in 2008-09, many RIAs who previously sold stakes to these “roll-up” consolidator firms began scrambling to pay quarterly preferred disbursements.  What gives, many implored? As a reformed Certified Financial Planner™, RIA representative, financial advisor and insurance agent, I can draw many parallels from these present day RIA consolidators to the similar Physician Practice Management Corporation roll-up fiasco of 1999-2000? Indeed, I can, and will [www.HealthcareFinancials.com]

My Experience with Medical Practice Consolidators

As a clinician and surgeon, I was the past president of a privately held regional Physician Practice Management Corporation [PPMC] in the Midwest. I assumed this route about a decade ago, by happenstance and background, when I helped consolidate 95 solo medical practices with about $50 million in revenues. But, our small company’s IPO roll-up attempt was aborted due to adverse market conditions, in 1999. Fortunately, a conservative business model based on debt, not the equity which was all the rage at the time, saved us right before the crash of 2000. So, we harvested fiscally conservative physicians who lost only a few operational start-up bucks; but no significant dollars.

On the other hand, those PPMCs roll-ups based on equity lost much more. In fact, according to the Cain Brothers index of public PPMCs, more than 95% of all equity value was lost by doctor-investors hoping to cash in on Wall Street’s riches they did not rightly deserve; not by practicing medicine but by betting on rising stock prices. So, projecting a repeat disaster from medicine, to the contemporary RIA consolidator business model, was not a great leap for me. And unfortunately, this was one of the few times I was all too correct in my prognostications.

PPMC’s Today

The type of medical consolidator or roll-up, formally called the Physician Practice Management Corporation [PPMC], was left for dead by the year 1999. Even survivors like Pediatrix Medical Group saw its stock drop precipitously. And, more than a few private medical practices had to be bought back by the same physicians that sold out to the PPMCs originally.

RIA Example

I sure hope this does not occur with FAs, as well. But, if an entity is being bought back and accounts receivables are being purchased, FAs should be careful not to pick this item up as income twice. The costs can be immense to the RIA practice, as later clients of mine learned the hard way.

Buy-Backs

For example, let’s say a family practice [or RIA?] purchased itself back from a PPMC, or RIA consolidator. Part of the mandatory purchase price, approximately $200,000 (the approximate net realizable value of the accounts receivable), was paid to the PPMC to buy back accounts receivable [ARs] generated by the physicians buying back their practice. Now, if an office administrator unknowingly begins recording the cash receipts specifically attributable to the purchased accounts receivable as patient fee income; trouble begins to brew. If left uncorrected, this error can incorrectly added $200,000 in income to this practice and cost it (a C Corporation) approximately $70,000 in additional income tax ($200,000 in fees x 35% tax rate). The error in the above example is that the PPMC [or RIA consolidator] must record the portion of the purchase price it received for the accounts receivable as patient [advisory] fee income. The buyer practice has merely traded one asset – cash – for another asset, the accounts receivable [ARs].  When the practice collects these particular receivables, the credit is applied against the purchased accounts receivable (an asset), rather than to patient [RIA] fees.  

RIA Revolution Follows PPMC Evolution

Today, surviving medical PPMCs are evolving from first generation multi-specialty national concerns, to second generation regional single specialty groups [my type], to third generation regional concerns, and finally to fourth generation Internet enabled service companies providing both business to business [B2B] solutions to affiliated medical practices, as well as business like consumer health solutions to plan members [healthcare 2.0]. I trust this sort of positive morphing will occur, over time, with the RIA consolidators. Perhaps yes, or no [www.HealthDictionarySeries.com]

RIA Consolidators

Among the most distressed RIA roll-up entities today may be the publically traded National Financial Partners and its more than 180 acquired firms, with more than 320 members in 41 states and Puerto Rico. NFP specializes in life insurance and wealth transfers, corporate and executive benefits, and financial planning and investment advisory services. Jessica M. Bibliowicz has been NFP’s President and CEO since inception in 1999. She is the daughter of Sandy Weill, and a member of the Board of Overseers for the Weill Medical College and Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University. NFP’s stock has declined from a high of $56 more than a year ago, to a current trading range of $3-4.           

And the Question Is?

And so, the question that MDs and RIAs should have asked when contemplating this business model was simply this: would I but the stock of an acquiring roll-up company if I were not part of the deal?

Valuable Consideration

Why? When MDs and RIAs sell to a consolidator, part of their “valuable consideration” is stock equity, so confidence and a conscientious work ethic is important. But, these “‘sell-out” entities are not retirement vehicles according to former financial advisor Hope Rachel Hetico; RN, MHA, CMP™ – a nurse executive and managing partner for www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com. Hope is also managing editor of this blog forum.

Assessment

More pointedly, according to one seller mentioned in the Churchill article,

“the whole [consolidator] pyramid is built on cash flows based on incremental growth and hugely optimistic projections of that growth”.  

Conclusion

Rest assured, the consolidator business model can be very successful; just think H. Wayne Huizenga’s Blockbuster Video and Waste Management, Inc. And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated? Why didn’t consolidation work in medicine, or with the RIAs? Or, reframed, why did consolidation work in the garbage collections industry and video store space? Can the fiercely independent RIA space learn something from the fiercely independent medical space?

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

 

Medical Office Expensing v. Depreciating

Some Tax Basics for Medical Professionals

By Edwin P. Morrow; III, JD, LLM

56371606Astute financial advisors and healthcare focused accountants know that there are simple and overlooked strategies that can significantly add to the bottom line of any business or medical practice; as much as increasing practice revenues or reducing expenses. Physicians and medical professionals themselves should also understand some basic accounting and simple tax strategies that do not require five figure consulting fees or excessive risks of audit. Here are some basic concepts of financial accounting to know.

Tax Deductible Expenses

Medical professionals should understand the basic concept of a tax-deductible expense, which can be used to offset income in the year paid or accrued, and a capital expenditure.

Capital Expenditures

 A capital expenditure must either be depreciated (similar terms are amortized or depleted), meaning that there is a deduction made over several years, or the expenditure may be required to be added to the tax basis of the property, meaning that there is only a tax benefit upon sale of the property.

An expense that adds to the value or useful life of medical office property is a capital expense.  Capital expenses include expenditures for buildings, significant improvements or instrumentations and related medical machinery. For instance, a repair on an office roof may be a deductible expense, but a new roof will be a capital expenditure.  Although both may be expensive, the repair reduces income dollar for dollar in year one, and the new roof reduces income only gradually over many years.

Understanding Accounting Concepts

 This is a very important tax accounting concept. In essence, any significant asset purchased or expenditure that has a useful life of more than one year cannot be expensed, but may be eligible to be depreciated over the life of the asset. This means you have to wait many years to get the full tax benefit from the expenditure.

Depreciation Useful Life

Some common assets and their default useful life according to the IRS are:

  • Computers and Peripherals – 5 years
  • Office Machinery and Equipment – 5 years
  • Transportation Equipment – 5 years
  • Office Furniture and Fixtures – 7 years
  • Certain Watercraft – 10 years
  • Farm Buildings – 20 years
  • Residential Rental Property – 27.5 years
  • Leasehold Improvements – 39 years
  • Non-residential Real Property – 39 years
  • Land without improvements – cannot be depreciated
  • Items held for inventory or ultimate sale – cannot be depreciated

Assessment

Note that even if your office computer hardware becomes obsolete in one or two years that the IRS may make you use the five-year depreciation schedule, but see the following section on Section 179 elections for exceptions. Computer software bundled and included with hardware must use the same rule. Software that has a useful life of less than a year, such as tax preparation software, may be a deductible expense, but other software costs may be amortized over 3 years.  IRC § 167(f)(1).  There may also be exceptions to the depreciation requirement for environmental cleanup costs, which may be eligible to be expensed as a deduction IRC § 198.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated. How have you used these strategies in the past?

Speaker:If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now:Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos 

Product Details  Product Details

 

Independent Contractors versus Doctor Employees

Join Our Mailing List

Some Tax Basics for Medical Professionals

[By Edwin P. Morrow; III, JD, LLM]

Staff Writersfp-book

Medical professional should be careful overusing this technique, in the office or other business.

IRS Attacks

Why? The IRS has successfully attacked many companies that tried to classify their workers as independent contractors rather than employees. The back taxes and penalties can be fierce. 

Delegation not Employment

However, many tasks may be successfully delegated to independent contractors or consultants without fear of such characterization. For example, a company does not have to withhold payroll taxes for an independent contractor, but must file a 1099-MISC whenever payments exceed $600 a year. To distinguish between the two, there are several factors to consider.  In general, the more you have control over a worker, the more the worker looks like an employee. Two brief tables below note a few of the differences:

Employee:                                                        

  • Works at site of employer                                              
  • Uses company tools or equipment                                  
  • Cannot delegate or hire others for job                              
  • Method/timing of job specified/controlled             
  • Expenses reimbursed                                                    
  • Little invested by worker                                    
  • Payment weekly, bi-weekly or monthly               
  • Only works for one employer                                          
  • No risk of non-payment if poor job                                   
  • Profit/bonus limited                                                       
  • No advertising                                                               
  • Contract states employee relationship                
  • Position seems permanent                                            
  • Work done is essential to business                                

Independent Contractor:

  • Works off-site
  • Uses own tools and equipment
  • Can hire others or delegate
  • Method/timing of job uncontrolled
  • Expenses borne by worker
  • More invested by worker
  • Payment by the job or flat fee
  • Works for several clients
  • Opportunity for profit
  • Advertising to general public
  • Contract says independent contractor
  • Position temporary
  • Work done is non-core function

Multi-Factorial Analysis Needed

No single one of these factors determines status. The IRS has a 20-factor test outlined in Revenue Ruling 87-41 and discussed in Publication 1976, “Independent Contractor or Employee”.  When you have a relationship that is unclear, you should consult with the IRS guidelines and publications. If your intent is to hire an independent contractor, try to make sure the relationship has more of the factors indicative of that status, checking the latest IRS publication for all relevant factors. Because of the large amounts at stake, you should err on the side of employee status if uncertain. You may wish consult a tax attorney or accountant as well, especially if you have multiple workers in a gray area. In addition, you can request that the IRS make a determination of worker classification by submitting Form SS-8, “Determination of Employee Work Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding.

***

***

Assessment

The IRS guidelines on this topic are rather lengthy. And, $600 is still the threshold amount this year unless it is royalties ($10).  Non-employee compensation, rent, royalties, prizes or awards, and services are only a few of the situations giving rise to a 1099-MISC. Doctors may also find this link of additional benefit:

http://www.ehow.com/how_13664_know-issue-1099.html

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

 

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners(TM)

***

Profits as Distribution – Not Wages

56371606Payroll Tax Strategies for Doctors

By Edwin P. Morrow; III, JD, LLM

[Staff Writers]

Any business, like a medical practice with employees, has to concern itself with payroll taxes.  This includes any C or S Corporation with a sole owner/employee. 

Payroll Taxes

Payroll taxes include: 1) income tax withholding for any employee for federal, state and local taxes; 2) the employer portion of federal social security and Medicare taxes (also called OASDI – old age, survivors and disability insurance); 3) the employee portion of federal social security and Medicare taxes; 4) state and federal unemployment tax [See IRS Publication 15, Employer’s Tax Guide]. These include a social security tax of 12.4% on earned income up to $106,800 (2009 number increases annually) and Medicare taxes of 2.9%. And, although there are not nearly as many tax “loopholes” with payroll taxes as with income taxes, impacting issues like this should be noted.

Distribution of Profits

And so, profits as distributions are a valid strategy for passive physician-investors not working in a business entity. If no work was done to earn the distribution and the profits earned based only on the owner’s capital contribution, then the distribution should not be subject to social security and Medicare taxes as wages. 

An Aggressive Strategy

However, this may be a more aggressive strategy for owners working in a business; or practice.  Yet, some tax practitioners are comfortable characterizing a certain amount of payment to owner/workers as a distribution of profits to owners rather than as wages, which could save up to 15.3% employment tax. 

Avoiding Wage Re-Characterization

This may be done through a partnership or S Corporation (this technique would lead to potential double tax in a C Corporation), though many practitioners feel treatment of S Corporation distributions is more likely to safely avoid re-characterization as wages due to older IRS proposed regulations that are more negative on this point to tax partnerships.  Proposed Regulation § 1.1402(a)-2(h)(2).  This regulation has not been passed and is not law, but is the closest thing to guidance on IRS thinking in this area.  The IRS will not likely subject a distribution of a tax partnership to self-employment taxes unless one of the following apply:

 

  • the partner or member has personal liability for debts of the partnership (common in a general partnership or LLP, but not in an LLC, and not for a limited partner in a LP);
  • the partner or member has authority to contract on behalf of the partnership (common in member managed LLP or LLC, but not for a limited partner in a LP or a non-managing member in a manager managed LLC); or
  • the partner or member participates in the business more than 500 hours a year.

As can bee seen, at least one of these criteria will often apply to many partners or owners of LLP or LLC interests, but will not apply to a limited partner or an LLC owner whose interest closely resembles that of a limited partner.  That said; some practitioners go beyond these regulations because they are not binding interpretations.  

A Warning

Remember the adage, however, that “pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered”. If you try to declare everything you make as a dividend style distribution and not wages, the IRS will use the “reasonable salary” guideline to re-characterize the distribution as truly wages. The company or practice must pay its owner/employee a reasonable salary for work done based on the nature of the job.  Basically, what would it cost to hire someone to do what you do? 

Assessment

The IRS may be more successful in treating a distribution as wages where a company is primarily a service business, like a medical practice, and capital investment is not a factor in production of income, or where there are no other employees that one can claim as helping to produce the excess income.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Join Our Mailing List

Retained Earnings and Employed Children

Payroll Tax Strategies for Doctorsdv2034034

By Edwin P. Morrow; III, JD, LLM

Staff Writers

Any business, like a medical practice with employees, has to concern itself with payroll taxes. This includes any C or S Corporation with a sole owner/employee. 

Payroll Taxes

Payroll taxes include: 1) income tax withholding for any employee for federal, state and local taxes; 2) the employer portion of federal social security and Medicare taxes (also called OASDI – old age, survivors and disability insurance); 3) the employee portion of federal social security and Medicare taxes; 4) state and federal unemployment tax [See IRS Publication 15, Employer’s Tax Guide]. These include a social security tax of 12.4% on earned income up to $106,800 (2009 number increases annually) and Medicare taxes of 2.9%. And, although there are not nearly as many tax “loopholes” with payroll taxes as with income taxes, impacting issues like these two should be noted.

1] Employ your children under 18

A sole proprietor physician may not be required to pay social security taxes on wages of his or her child under the age of 18.  This exception does not apply to an incorporated business IRC § 3121(b)

2] Understanding Retained Earnings

As some doctors are aware, earnings retained in a C or S Corporation and not distributed to shareholders are not subject to social security and Medicare taxes. This may be a substantial savings of 15.3% when you have owners working in the company. This technique is not as likely to work in a tax partnership and will certainly not work in a sole proprietorship.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this brief Medical Executive-Post are appreciated.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Understanding Payroll Taxes

Accounting Issues for Doctors56371606

By Edwin P. Morrow; III, JD, LLM

Staff Writers

Any business, like a medical practice with employees, has to concern itself with payroll taxes.  This includes any C or S Corporation with a sole owner / employee. 

Payroll Taxes

Payroll taxes include: 1) income tax withholding for any employee for federal, state and local taxes; 2) the employer portion of federal social security and Medicare taxes (also called OASDI – old age, survivors and disability insurance); 3) the employee portion of federal social security and Medicare taxes; 4) state and federal unemployment tax [See IRS Publication 15, Employer’s Tax Guide].

Non-Employees

A non-employee business or medical practice owner (which may be a partner in a tax partnership) must pay the equivalent of these taxes, called Self-Employment Taxes, in lieu of the above taxes  IRC § 1401. These include a social security tax of 12.4% on earned income up to $106,800 (2009 number increases annually) and Medicare taxes of 2.9%. Instead of income tax withholding, the owner doctor pays Estimated Taxes on a quarterly basis. A non-employee owner is unlikely to be required to pay unemployment taxes.

Impacting Issues 

Both the employer and the employee must pay a social security tax of 6.2% of wages up to $106,800, and a Medicare tax of 1.45% of all wages. This totals 15.3% of the first $106,800, and 2.9% of all wages above that. You will notice that when combined, the employee and employer tax rates equal the self-employment tax rates. 

Assessment

Although tax planners often only discuss income tax planning, payroll taxes may sometimes be greater than the corporate income tax (starting at 15%) or individual income tax (which may be as low as 0, 10 or 15%), and should be considered just as important in planning to avoid excessive taxation.  Unlike income taxes, there is no standard deduction, exemption or delayed starting point for these taxes. The tax starts on the first dollar.  Although there are not nearly as many tax “loopholes” with payroll taxes as with income taxes, impacting issues should be noted.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Health Entity-Related Tax Credits

Some Unique Tax Basics for the Industry

By Edwin P. Morrow; III, JD, LLM

Staff Writers

In addition to the usual business deductions, medical professionals and those in healthcare should be aware of certain unique investment related tax credits. Much like personal credits, most of these credits are non-refundable, but may be allowed as carry forwards to the next year, or carry backs to prior years. 

Welfare to Work Credit

This credit is for medical employers who hire long-term family assistance recipients. It may be for up to 35% credit on applicable first year wages and 50% credit on second year wages. [See Form 8861] “Welfare to Work Credit”, for more details

Increased Research Expenditures Credit

This credit is applicable to health entity owners and startups. Research expenditures eligible for this credit must be to discover information that is technological in nature and intended for development of a new or improved business component. The research must relate to new or improved function, performance, reliability or quality. [See IRS Form 6765] “Credit for Increasing Research Activities”, for more details 

Disabled Access Credit

This credit is for eligible small medical and health entities that make a business accessible to disabled people. The credit may be 50% of qualifying expenditures. To be eligible, a small business must have gross receipts of $1 million or less, or have had no more than 30 employees during the preceding tax year. Eligible expenditures may include physical changes to the building, changes to the communication system, providing interpreters, acquiring or modifying equipment, or other accommodations for disabled access. [See Form 8826] “Disabled Access Credit”, for more details.

Empowerment Zone Employment Credit

This credit is to encourage employment in “empowerment zones” established by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Secretary of Agriculture. [See Form 8844] “Empowerment Zone Employment Credit”, for more details.

Indian Employment Credit

A credit of up to 20% of applicable in wages and health insurance benefits paid to qualified health employees who are enrolled members of an Indian tribe or their spouses.  Substantially all of the services performed must be within an Indian reservation and the employee must live on or near the reservation [See Form 8845] “Indian Employment Credit”, for more detail

Orphan Drug Credit

This credit is for qualified clinical drug testing expenses.  This credit may be for up to 50% of expenses incurred [See Form 8820] “Orphan Drug Credit”, for more details.

Assessment

What credits did we miss; please advise?

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated. Have you used any of these tax credit strategies in the past?

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

 

Physician Travel Expenses

Some Tax Basics for Medical Professionals

By Edwin P. Morrow; III, JD, LLM

Staff Writers

Astute financial advisors and healthcare focused accountants know that there are simple and overlooked strategies that can significantly add to the bottom line of any business or medical practice; as much as increasing practice revenues or reducing expenses. Physicians and medical professionals themselves should also understand some basic accounting and simple tax strategies that do not require five figure consulting fees or excessive risks of audit. Here are some basic deduction concepts of financial accounting to know.

Business Expenses

Expenses incurred while traveling away from home in the pursuit of medical business activities are deductible, but require good record keeping IRC § 162(a)(2).  This may include reasonable transportation costs such as airfare or taxi service, meals and lodging, telephone and fax, rental car or other costs. This may also include gratuities and tips.

Personal Side-Trips

But, if a personal side trip is taken, those expenses are not deductible, but the airfare and other expenses taken for the business part of the trip may still be deductible if the primary purpose of the trip is business.  Even dry cleaning and laundering, which would not be a deductible expense at home, are deductible if incurred on a business trip.

Spousal Issues

Expenses for a non-employee spouse are not directly deductible, but expenses such as a hotel room or rental car that may be shared might still be deductible if required for the employee.  Deductions for conventions, seminars or meetings held on cruise ships are subject to more stringent limitations, as are conventions or seminars held outside of North America (which includes much of the Caribbean, Canada and Mexico) IRC § 274(h). Expenses for travel outside of the United States for more than one week are also subject to more limitations if combined with a personal trip IRC § 274(c).

Assessment

Physicians and all taxpayers should keep records showing the nature of the expense, when it was incurred, the amount, and the business purpose.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated. How have you used these strategies in the past?

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Accounting Deductions for Physicians

Some Tax Basics for Medical Professionals

By Edwin P. Morrow; III, JD, LLM, and ME-P Staff Writersfp-book1

Astute financial advisors and healthcare focused accountants know that there are simple and overlooked strategies that can significantly add to the bottom line of any medical practice; just as much as increasing practice revenues or reducing expenses. Physicians and medical professionals themselves should also understand some basic accounting and simple tax strategies that do not require five figure consulting fees or excessive risks of audit. Here are some basic deduction concepts of financial accounting to know.

Commuting and Local Transportation Expenses 

Normally, standard commuting expenses to and from the home are personal expenses and not deductible. You cannot deduct the cost of your daily commute to work. There are exceptions, however. Commuting expenses to a temporary location outside of the normal business metro area may be deductible; such as the hospital or ASC. Expenses traveling from one medical office business location to another are also deductible. 

Life Insurance

Payments for life insurance are generally not excludible from income unless part of a medical group term life insurance policy with face amounts up to a maximum of $50,000 IRC § 79. Amounts of insurance greater than this amount will be taxable income to the employee (also subject to employment taxes).

Political Contributions

Political contributions in the recent elections cycle, for example, and lobbying expenses are not deductible, even if you can substantiate a direct medical business interest.

Professional Dues

Dues paid to professional organizations, like the AMA, ADA, AOA or APMA, are generally deductible. However, you may notice a disclaimer on some dues notices that indicate a portion of the dues used for political lobbying purposes, which are not deductible.  Dues to country clubs, athletic facilities, etc … will not be deductible, unless eligible for the 50% entertainment deduction mentioned earlier.

Assessment

Physicians and all taxpayers should keep records showing the nature of the expense, when it was incurred, the amount, and the business purpose.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated. How have you used these strategies in the past?

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

Product Details  Product Details

Healthcare Focused Tax Attorneys

Avoiding the “Managed Care Ripple Effect”

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™

The healthcare industrial complex represents a large and diverse industry, and the livelihood of other synergistic professionals who advise doctors depend on it as well. These include tax and estate attorneys who themselves wish to avoid the collateral ripple effects of the current healthcare debacle.

Lawyer as Financial Planner

As a tax, estate planning or bankruptcy lawyer, you already know that almost every legal magazine around has articles or advertisements proposing that you become a financial planning professional or business consultant to your physician clients.

Moreover, lawyers of all stripes are being pushed toward interdisciplinary alliances by encroachment on their turf by the Big Four accounting firms. With audits of publicly held companies now a commodity, the giant accounting firms are getting more of their revenues from consulting, and that puts them into direct competition with attorneys, MBAs, actuaries and other management and financial service professionals.

Avoiding a Medical Career

Of all careers, you know how absolutely onerous it is to practice medicine today, and are finally thankful that you did not take that career route many years ago.

So, like your neighbor the accountant, you begin to explore that potential of developing a service line extension to your legal practice, in order to assist your medical colleagues who have been hit on hard economic times. In fact, you soon realize that more than 90,000 trust, probate and estate planning attorneys like yourself are interested in pursuing financial planning in the next decade. Sure, you know it’s difficult to get a CLU or variable annuity license, or become a Certified Financial Planner™ (CFP), but earning your law degree was no cinch either.

And, you reckon, advising physicians has got to be easier than law, or less stressful than the corporate lifestyle of your MBA trained brother-in-law, right?

So, you set out to stretch your legal horizons and explore the basic legal nuances of those topics not available in law school when you were a student.  Things like medical fraud and abuse; managed care compliance audits and Medicare recoupments; OSHA, HIPAA and EPA standards; anti-trust issues; and managed care contract dilemmas or de-selection appeals.

Assessment

What a brave new world the legal profession has become! Even the American Bar Association’s commission on multi-disciplinary practice has recommended that lawyers be permitted to share fees and become partners with financial planners, money managers and other similar professionals.

As a real life example, the venerated Baltimore brokerage firm of Legg Mason Inc. teamed-up a few years ago, with the Boston law firm of Bingham Danna, LLC, to create one of the first marriages between a law and securities firm.  

And so, if you want in on the challenge, and bucks, you’d better acquire at least a working knowledge of healthcare administration, or perhaps help craft some new case law, or assist your doctor-clients in some fashion; otherwise, you will remain a legal document producer.

Disclaimer: Dr. Marcinko, a court approved expert witness and former Certified Financial Planner™, is also founder of the Certified Medial Planner™ program for all fiduciary consultants in health economics, financial planning and medical practice management www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Conclusion

Your thoughts are appreciated; please opine? Is this new industry concept a viable one?

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Copyright 2008 iMBA Inc: All rights reserved, USA, unless otherwise noted. Use is restricted to Executive-Post subscribers only. No redistribution is allowed. To avoid violation of iMBA Inc copyright restrictions and redistribution policy, please register for your own free Executive-Post membership. Detailed information and registration links are available at:

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Medical Executive-Post 

Who’s a Crummey Power Holder?

IRS Attacks Crummey Powers

Staff Reporters

Join Our Mailing List 

In the [in]famous 1991 case of Cristofani v. Commissioner, the Tax Court ruled that the IRS had improperly disallowed gift-tax exclusions to contingent beneficiary grandchildren while allowing exclusions for withdrawal rights given to the donor’s children. The IRS had reasoned that the withdrawal rights of the contingent beneficiary grandchildren did not constitute gifts of present interests in property.

Literature Review

An article by Lawrence Brody and Stephen B. Daiker, “IRS Questioning Legitimacy of Crummey Powerholders” [Journal of Financial Planning, October 1996, pp. 34–35, Institute of Certified Financial Planners (303) 759-4900], presented the IRS’s position with respect to limited withdrawal powers given to trust beneficiaries to qualify transfers to the trust(s) as annual exclusion gifts.

Technical Advice Memorandum

In a July 1996 Technical Advice Memorandum [TAM], the IRS ruled that none of the withdrawal powers granted in that case were gifts of present interests in property and, therefore, did not entitle the donor to gift-tax annual exclusions. These particular irrevocable trusts did not require that actual notice of the withdrawal rights be given to the beneficiaries, and the powerholders had no beneficial trust interest other than the Crummey power.

Also, notices were given to powerholders only days prior to expiration of the withdrawal period, and the trust bank account was not funded until after expiration of the withdrawal period. The IRS also believed that there was a “prearranged understanding” that the Crummey withdrawal right would not be exercised or that doing so would result in unfavorable consequences—including possible disinheritance.

The IRS position

The IRS position seemed to be that if the powerholder has no economic interest in the trust to provide an incentive to allow the withdrawal right to lapse, the annual exclusion will not, in its view, be available. This common-sense approach to Crummey powerholders unfortunately does not clarify whose rights can or cannot be counted.

Assessment

Most likely, there will be additional litigation or rulings in this area, but it appears that medical practitioners, and their advisors, should ascertain that trusts require actual notice to beneficiaries of limited withdrawal rights; that timely notices and trust funding be provided; and that there be no evidence of a “prearranged understanding” regarding withdrawals.

Conclusion

Your thoughts on Crummey powers are appreciated; please opine and comment. Has the situation changed drastically, if at all, since this ruling?

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Speaker:If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com 

Subscribe Now:Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Copyright 2008 iMBA Inc: All rights reserved, USA, unless otherwise noted. Use is restricted to Medical Executive-Post subscribers only. No redistribution is allowed. To avoid violation of iMBA Inc copyright restrictions and redistribution policy, please register for your own free Medical Executive-Post membership. Detailed information and registration links are available at:

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Medical Executive-Post.

Product Details  Product Details

Risky Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Are They Worth the Risk to Physician Executives?

By Staff Reporters

Join Our Mailing List 

The use of nonqualified deferred compensation plans in corporate healthcare administration has grown substantially in the past 10 years; for several reasons.

Reasons for Popularity

For example, senior physician-executives are becoming subject to lower contribution and benefit limits in qualified plans, are involved in more mid-career change hires, are being subjected to greater emphasis on performance-based compensation, and may experience higher income tax rates in a potential democratic administration in 2009.

Any financial advisor who works with senior physician-executive clients participating in such plans must thoroughly understand how nonqualified plans work and how they can affect every aspect of an executive’s finances.

Advantages

The advantage of tax deferral offered by nonqualified plans may, however, be more than offset by the risks to which the funds in these plans are subjected. Physician-executives should carefully evaluate their exposure to a retirement income shortfall, which may result from having a major portion of one’s retirement nest egg tied to unsecured capital. Individual indemnity insurance may need to be purchased to protect against this risk.

Guidelines

Some useful guidelines for the physician-executive and his/her financial consultant follow:

  • Review nonqualified plan documents, especially when plan provisions require client action or change.
  • Summarize the provisions of previously signed deferral agreements and other nonqualified plan statements, especially amount, timing, and method of payouts.
  • Analyze financial security under various retirement scenarios.
  • Review current estate plan instruments to determine if trusts are funded with nonqualified plan assets.
  • Update the asset allocation model to reflect any constraints imposed by the nonqualified investments.
  • Plan for potential constructive receipt.
  • Modify projected annual cash flows to allow for additional Medicare tax payments.
  • Quantify future payments from all nonqualified plans and the effect on marginal tax rates.

Assessment

The risks involved in the tax deferral offered by nonqualified plans occur because a senior physician-executive may:

  • Bet his or her long-term security on the viability of a single company.
  • Become over-dependent on unsecured funds.
  • Incur extra estate taxes because of failure to properly plan for plan distributions.
  • Fail to diversify because of limited investment alternatives in the plan.
  • Become subject to the constructive receipt problem and possibly to FICA tax at an earlier than expected time.

Conclusion

Please comment and opine on the above relative to the current tax structure, as well as a potential future change by political fiat?

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Copyright 2008 iMBA Inc: All rights reserved, USA, unless otherwise noted. Use is restricted to Medical Executive-Post subscribers only. No redistribution is allowed. To avoid violation of iMBA Inc copyright restrictions and redistribution policy, please register for your own free Medical Executive-Post membership. Detailed information and registration links are available at:

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Medical Executive-Post.

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

Innocent-Spouse Tax Relief

Join Our Mailing List

Getting the IRS Facts

[Staff Writers]

Married physicians and other couples generally choose to file a joint tax return because they get the best tax breaks from that filing status; despite elimination of the “marriage penalty” several years ago.  

However, joint filing has its downside. One spouse can be held fully liable for all the tax due—even if all of the income was attributable to the other spouse. What’s more a divorce does not limit a spouse’s liability—even if the decree requires the other spouse to pay the taxes.

IRS Reform Act

There is, however, a way out: The taxpayer can apply to the IRS for innocent spouse relief. What’s more, the IRS Reform Act, as previously discussed in the Executive-Post, liberalized the rules for obtaining relief.

Get the FAQs

Some time ago, the IRS released answers to frequently asked questions [FAQs] about the innocent spouse rules. The IRS release spells out policies and procedures that apply to innocent spouse requests.

Q. What kind of relief is available?

A. There are three kinds of relief: (1) innocent spouse relief; (2) separation of liability; and (3) equitable relief. Each category has different requirements and procedures.

Q. What are the rules for innocent spouse relief?

A. To qualify for innocent spouse relief, a taxpayer must meet all of the following conditions:

• The taxpayer filed a joint return with an understatement of tax.

• The understatement was due to erroneous items of the other spouse.

• At the time the return was signed, the taxpayer did not know and had no reason to know of the understatement of tax.

• Taking into account all of the facts and circumstances, it would be unfair to hold the taxpayer liable for the understatement.

Q. What are the rules for separation of liability?

A. Under this type of relief, the joint return understatement is divided between the spouses, according to their earnings and assets. To qualify for separate liability, the taxpayer must meet either of the following requirements at the time of the request:

1. The taxpayer is no longer married to, or is legally separated from, the spouse with whom the joint return is filed. For this purpose, a taxpayer is no longer married if he or she is widowed.

2. The taxpayer was not a member of the same household as the spouse at any time during the 12-month period ending on the date of the request. However, a request for separation of liability may be denied if the taxpayer or spouse transferred assets to avoid paying tax or the taxpayer had knowledge of any of the incorrect items when the joint return was filed.

Q. Will the IRS grant a request for separation of liability if a husband and wife are still married, but have been separated for at least 12 months for an involuntary reason such as incarceration or military duty?

A. Separation of liability applies to all taxpayers who have been living apart for 12 months or more preceding the filing of a claim.

Q. What are the rules for equitable relief?

A. Equitable relief is available only if a taxpayer does not qualify for innocent spouse relief or separation of liability. The IRS must determine that it would be unfair to hold the taxpayer liable, taking into account all the facts and circumstances. Unlike innocent spouse relief or separation of liability, equitable relief may apply to an underpayment of tax properly shown on a return.

Q. What factors will the IRS consider in deciding whether to grant equitable relief?

A. The following factors will be considered:

• Current marital status

• Abuse experienced during the marriage

• The taxpayer’s reasonable belief, at the time the return was signed, that the tax was going to be paid

• Current financial hardship

• Underpayment or understatement attributable to the nonrequesting spouse

• Lack of significant benefit received by the requesting spouse.

Bear in mind, however, that this list is not all-inclusive.

Q. What if one spouse forged the other’s name on a joint return? Does the nonsigning spouse qualify for relief?

A. Relief is available, but not under the innocent spouse rules. If a spouse can prove that his or her signature was forged, and there was no tacit consent to the signing, the return is invalid for that spouse.

Q. If a spouse signs an examination report that lists omissions of income, does that mean he or she had knowledge of the items giving rise to the deficiency?

A. No. The innocent spouse rules make it clear that knowledge has to do with what was known at the time the return was signed.

Q. How do state community property laws affect a taxpayer’s ability to qualify for relief?

A. Community property laws are not taken into account by the IRS for purposes of any request for relief from liability.

Q. Do the new relief rules apply to any outstanding tax liability?

A. The rules apply to (1) unpaid balances as of July 22, 1998, and (2) liabilities arising after July 22, 1998, and as amended.

Q. How does a taxpayer request relief?

A. The taxpayer should file Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, along with a statement providing additional information for the IRS to consider. One form can cover multiple years. The IRS will automatically consider all three types of relief when processing a request.

Assessment

It is not know how many medical professionals are familiar with the above; but it is likely very few. That’s why the sage advice of a CPA or tax attorney is always helpful.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Hospitals: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Product Details  Product Details

Reining In the Tax Collector

IRS Restructuring and the Reform Act

Staff Writers

The “IRS Restructuring and Reform Act” is finally helping some professionals like doctors protect themselves from tax liens and levies

Prior to the Act

Before the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act went into effect almost a decade ago, matters concerning tax liens or levies were routine at the IRS, causing serious problems for medical professionals and family-owned businesses [FOBs]. Revenue officers issued notices of liens and levies merely as they deemed appropriate.

Since the Act

However, since the Reform Act went into effect, revenue officers have been required to obtain a supervisor’s approval before initiating collection activities or issuing notices of liens or levies. Now, supervisors review and investigate a case before a lien or levy is issued (i.e., homes and family business stock).

Specifically, for example, the supervisor must review the balance due from the taxpayer and confirm that the indicated collection action is appropriate given the amount owed by the taxpayer. This provision went into effect immediately upon passage of the act.

However, the effective date for automatic collection activities was delayed until Jan. 1, 2001. This delay was because most liens and levies are automated. Errors commonly occur in automatic liens and levies, but the IRS is working to introduce a human element into the transactions. Many doctors and family business professionals are taking advantage of the lien review requirement, helping clients avoid harsh collection activities.

Jeopardy Assessments Forbidden

In a related change, no jeopardy or termination assessments may be made without written review and written approval of the IRS chief counsel. Within five days of any jeopardy assessment, the IRS must provide the taxpayer with a written statement indicating the reason for taking action. As a result, substantially fewer jeopardy and termination assessments have been made. In addition, some family business professionals and doctors report they have been able to avoid jeopardy assessments and often challenge the basis for making the assessment.

Wage Levy

Under the Act, the IRS must release and cancel a wage levy once an agreement is made that the tax liability is uncollectible. If a wage levy is issued, tax-payers now have a firmer foundation for negotiating an end to the levy. This is helpful because, previously, levies were continued despite un-collectibility.

Seizure

Unless collection is in jeopardy, any property used in the business and personal property may not be seized without approval of an IRS district director. In determining whether to grant such approval, the taxpayer’s future ability to earn income will be taken into account. This provision has helped many substantially reduce the seizure of their business assets. Taxpayers have a right to contest a levy and to prevent or limit orders of seizures in appropriate cases.

IRAs and Qualified Plans

The IRS can continue to levy on IRA’s or qualified plan balances. However, the 10% excise tax on early withdrawals will no longer apply; this avoids the harsh double penalty of the past. If a doctor is faced with an IRS levy on an IRA or qualified plan, s/he may not want to withdraw the funds from an IRA or qualified plan to pay the obligation. The withdrawal will result in a 10% excise tax.

However, if the doctor pays the taxes with an IRS levy in place, the penalty is avoided. Some financial consultants report they have issued memoranda to their clients on this subject. For example, a taxpayer who previously had a federal tax lien placed on his or her property can have the lien discharged by posting a bond or by depositing the taxes. The cash deposited can be refunded if there is no deficiency, or if the deficiency is reduced. Such bonds are now being used in appropriate cases.

Liens

The IRS must notify a taxpayer if it intends to place a lien on the taxpayer’s property. The taxpayer then can request a hearing within 30 days. He or she also may contest any levy, unless collection of tax is in jeopardy. Doctors routinely are requesting hearings, using this procedure to terminate liens.

In addition, the taxpayer can request an installment agreement prior to levy. Thirty days after a hearing, the taxpayer can appeal the decision to the Tax Court. The act thus provides statutory appeals rights to taxpayers who are subject to a federal tax lien.

The hearing must be impartial and fair. The right of judicial review also ensures that the appeals officers act fairly. Taxpayers are informed of all their rights under these provisions. Congress has imposed a clear cut obligation on the IRS to consider alternatives to liens, such as posting of bonds, installment agreements, or offers in compromise. Thus, the medical professional has several alternatives to now consider. The right of judicial review is a major expansion of taxpayers’ rights.

Employment Taxes

The right of statutory appeal and the right of possible alternative obligations opens up a whole new area of appeal for the doctor and other taxpayers. The Reform Act permits early referral of disputes regarding independent contractors and similar matters. This should permit faster resolution of cases regarding employment status (employee or independent contractor). Many family businesses and/or medical practices contract with individuals employed by an outsourcing firm. The number of audits in this area has increased, and the IRS often regards the individual doctor as an employee of the medical practice or family business. In addition, the IRS has been encouraged to use mediation and arbitration to resolve disputes.

Offers-in-Compromise

Under the Act, the IRS must to consider factors such as equity or hardship when considering offers in compromise. The IRS is expected to forgo interest and penalties in appropriate cases. Rejected offers are subject to administrative review. Some medical professionals are finding the IRS more readily accepting of compromise offers.

Harassment

Many of the protections from harassment afforded to individuals by the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act in the commercial area have been extended to IRS collections. Some of those rights include not calling the taxpayer late at night, not harassing the taxpayer, and not dealing with the taxpayer if s/he has an authorized representative. If a violation occurs, the taxpayer can sue for negligent disregard of the Code. Here too, some doctors report that harassment-type activities have declined.

Innocent-Spouse Relief

The act contains significant provisions designed to protect innocent taxpayers from the tax misdeeds of their spouses the “innocent spouse relief” provision. The Tax Court can review any denials of innocent spouse relief.

Under the new rules, there must be actual knowledge of a tax misdeed before a taxpayer is considered “not innocent.” In the past, the test was whether the taxpayer knew or should have known about the other spouse’s tax misdeeds. Innocent spouse relief is easier to obtain under the “actual knowledge” test and is used routinely now.

Innocent spouse relief also is available on a partial basis. A taxpayer is relieved of liability on a partial basis even if he or she knew about the misdeeds, provided he or she did not know the extent of the misdeeds.

Thus, the spouse should not be liable for the portion of the understatement he or she had no knowledge of. This usually is as an alternative to a complete relief. All provisions (except the automatic lien provision) apply to any liability for taxes arising before, on, or after July 22, 1998.

Assessment

Since the IRS Reform Act passed, some doctors are working to protect themselves from tax collection activities or assessments. This is particularly true in innocent spouse cases. It bodes well therefore, for all family businesses, health practices, physician-executives and medical professionals to become and remain familiar with the provisions in the IRS Reform Act addressing such activities. You may just become grateful for this knowledge one day.

Conclusion

Your thoughts, comments and experiences on any or all of the above topics, are appreciated.

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Executive-Post.

Life Insurance Policies and Trusts

Tax and Estate Planning for Doctors

Staff Writers

All subscribers to the Executive-Post know that carefully crafted arrangements may minimize estate and income taxes.

Life Insurance Policies

The simplest way for a medical or other professional to avoid estate tax on the proceeds from life insurance policy death-benefit, is having a properly drafted trust own the life insurance policy. The best approach is for the trust to purchase the policy, but if you already own it, you can transfer the policy to a trust. If the doctor survives the transfer by no less than three years, the proceeds will escape estate taxation [three year throw-back rule]. The settlor can retain the right to remove the trustee and appoint a successor, who is not related or subordinate to the grantor. Most grantors wish to retain such a right.

Periodic Gifting

Generally, the insured provides funds for the premium payments through periodic gifts to the trust. In most cases, the gift qualifies as a gift of a present interest (rather than future interest), qualifying for the $12,000 exemption.

By using a Crummey withdrawal power, the beneficiary is permitted to withdraw property whenever a contribution is made. The right usually is given each year with a specified period (30–60 days). If an affirmative election is not made, the power will lapse. This notice should provide reasonable time for the election and be in writing. Generally, the withdrawal right must be exercised affirmatively. In any event, if the beneficiary does not take action or respond to the letters, the Tax Court has previously indicated that 15 days is a reasonable period of time.

Minor’s Guardian

The Crummey power can be exercised by a minor’s guardian (parents). However, it is best if someone else can exercise the withdrawal right if the donor is also the parent. An unrelated guardian can always have the right to exercise the Crummey withdrawal power.

Last-to-Die Insurance

A popular use of insurance for physicians is the so called last-to-die insurance policy. Such insurance is payable upon the death of both the donor and his spouse.

For a Family Owned Business [FOB], this permits the owner to bequeath or gift the stock to the spouse free of transfer tax when the second spouse dies the insurance proceeds are paid to the trust and utilized to pay the estate taxes on the FOB stock. The insurance proceeds are free from both estate and income tax.

Conclusion

Your thoughts, opinions and comments are appreciated.

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Executive-Post.

Economics of Variable Annuities

The “Ups and Downs” of Variable Investments

[By Staff Writers]

Join Our Mailing List 

The chief advantage of variable annuities is that investment income or gains are not currently taxable. However, when distributions are made, all gain is ordinary income, even if substantially all of the gains realized on the investment were capital gains.

Investments made directly by a Family Owned Business [FOB] member, for example, does not achieve tax deferral. But, assuming the dividends and other income are small (e.g., a growth portfolio), and all gains are capital gains taxed at the maximum rate, then direct investment may be a far superior method of investment.

Forbes summed it up, saying, “Don’t be a sucker!”

Despite Forbes’ warning, variable annuities are not necessarily an easy investment decision.

Sales Growth

Sales of variable annuities have continued to grow despite the reduction of capital gain rates in the recent years of the Bush Presidency, and the future is unknown. But, if the deferral is long enough, or if the portfolio throws-off ordinary income (e.g., a bond portfolio), then variable annuities may be desirable. However, doctors and medical professionals should exercise caution about variable annuities.

Fees and Expenses

Variable annuity fees vary widely from carrier to carrier but in many cases they are still high, putting such investments at a competitive disadvantage. If the fees are reasonable, and the medical professional client intends to invest in high yield bonds (also know as junk bonds), then a variable annuity can be attractive.

The same is true for traders who move in and out of funds and earn a large amount of short-term capital gains. In any event, all doctors should check the fees charged by the insurance company because they vary widely. Some funds that charge fees also have outperformed other funds.

Taxation

Investing in traditional equity can give rise to dividends of 1.5% (the average) that is subject to taxation. Variable annuities shelter the dividends, but at a cost often reaching 1.25%. This is not exactly an attractive investment trade-off.

Capital Gains

In addition, all capital gains derived from the portfolio are taxable as ordinary income when distributed; also not a good result.

Distributions upon Death

Assets held outright get a step-up in basis upon death. Variable annuity distributions are income-in-respect-of-a-decedent. Thus, there is no step-up in basis. This is harsh taxation, and the combined estate and income taxes can be 100% (e.g. the decedent’s estate may be is subject to a 5% surtax).

Thus, a 55-60% estate tax and a 35-40% ordinary income tax rate results in 100% taxation and confiscation. Counting the limitation on a deduction, the effective tax rate might be 42%, causing the combined taxes to exceed 100%. If the estate taxes can be deducted from the income taxes, the taxation of variable annuities is lessened.

Moreover, if a family business client has a charitable interest, using income-in-respect-of-a-decedent property to fund a gift to charity is a sound planning idea (the charity pays no income taxes and gifts to charities are not subject to estate taxes). Here, variable annuities may have one big advantage; they can prevent creditors from reaching assets. However, if this is a concern then the same results can be achieved by using an asset protection trust.

globe

Assessment

Tax deferral always appeals to medical and other clients, but in some cases, variable annuity tax deferral may not be a effective tax planning tool. In addition, postmortem planning can help to reduce the tax burden to children.

Variable annuities require clear analysis and discussion. Doctors, and their accountants and financial advisors should discuss this issue before investing in them. The reason, quite simply, is that most doctors do not like to pay current tax and they may leap at a variable annuity which can result in increased taxation. How ironic!

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Product Details  Product Details

Key-Man Life Insurance Proceeds Ruling

Join Our Mailing List

IRS Tax Exempt Treatment Ruling

[By Robert Whirley, CPA]

A recent revenue ruling has been issued by the Internal Revenue Service addressing the tax exempt treatment of life insurance policy proceeds on “key-man” policies of Subchapter S-Corporations; medical and/or otherwise. 

Excerpts

Revenue Ruling 2008-42 concludes that premiums paid by the S-Corporation on an employer-owned life insurance contract, of which it is directly or indirectly a beneficiary, do not reduce the S-Corporation’s AAA. Further, the benefits received because of the death of the insured from an employer-owned life insurance contract that meets an exception under Code Sec. 101(j)(2) do not increase its AAA.

Assessment

This may sound like Greek to some doctors. The affect is that life insurance proceeds on key-man policies in an S-Corporation are essentially trapped in the corporation. Any distribution of that cash to surviving S-Corporation shareholders – or to the estate of the deceased shareholder – triggers a taxable event.   

It is therefore vital for any doctor with a life policy paid by your medical practice, or other S-corporation, to discuss the tax policy and estate planning particulars with your accountant.

Channel Surfing the ME-P

Have you visited our other topic channels? Established to facilitate idea exchange and link our community together, the value of these topics is dependent upon your input. Please take a minute to visit. And, to prevent that annoying spam, we ask that you register. It is fast, free and secure.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details  Product Details

 

Getting IRS Answers

Join Our Mailing List

Even When You Shouldn’t Ask

By Staff Writers

Our complex tax system has sparked moves toward a flat tax in 2008 and other efforts at simplification. But until such a change occurs—if it ever does—we are stuck with what we have. This means many doctors and all taxpayers will continue to be confused and uncertain about their tax situations, and they will have a lot of questions.

The IRS Source

According to many experts, the IRS, which should be the best source for doctor answers, does not come through nearly often enough. But, it does offer some options. Which one you choose depends on the complexity and nature of the problem. Some simple, straightforward questions may be readily answered by a phone call. But for questions that are more complicated, it might be better to do it in a letter—following IRS guidelines—and get a written answer. And, in some cases, you may be better off not asking the question in the first place.

Phoning the IRS

Getting through to the IRS can be difficult. Its lines are often busy, especially during tax season. According to a not-so-recent report by the General Accounting Office, only 20% of callers got through to the IRS on the first call during last year’s tax return season (50% eventually got through). The IRS itself says you should avoid calling during lunch hours or on Mondays. But more serious is the reliability of the information you get. And, as a rule, the IRS will not stand behind its oral advice.

Example:

—Emma and James Clarke called an IRS helpline and asked whether they would be taxed on funds they wanted to withdraw from an individual retirement account (IRA) to buy a home. The Clarkes believed that they were told the transactions would result in no tax. So they withdrew the funds. When the IRS taxed them on the withdrawals, the Clarkes went to the Tax Court. They argued that they should not be taxed because they had relied on the erroneous advice of an IRS representative.

The IRS said that the Clarkes had misunderstood. According to the IRS, its representative told them only that they would not face the 10% tax on early withdrawals since they were over age 59½.

The Tax Court had no way of knowing whether the Clarkes had misunderstood or had been given mistaken advice. But the court said it did not matter. The tax law calls for taxes on IRA withdrawals, and the IRS had to follow the law.

Note: The IRS is not legally bound by mistakes its agents may make.

Precautions

The risk of getting incorrect advice does not mean that you should never call the IRS. But you should do some things to protect yourself. In particular, after you get an answer to your question, ask the IRS representative if information on the subject appears in any IRS publication. Then order the publication from the IRS and check the answer you received.

For example, suppose you want to know whether you can claim your father as your dependent. Even if the IRS representative says you can, you would be smart to check the IRS’s Publication 17, Your Federal Income Tax, which sets forth all the requirements for claiming someone as a dependent. Even if the representative is knowledgeable, it’s easy in a conversation for one party to misunderstand the other.

The same basic principles apply if you visit a local IRS office and speak to an agent. You can then easily pick up the publications you need, too.

If you use your computer to surf the Internet, you now can get some forms and basic information from the IRS via the World Wide Web (www.irs.ustreas.gov). But you cannot yet ask questions and get tax help this way.

Writing for Help

You will get the most protection by writing to the IRS with your question, because it will have to send you the answer. Then, if you follow this written advice and it turns out to be wrong, penalties you would otherwise owe will be avoided.

Private letter rulings

—These are among the most common forms of IRS guidance. You would request a private letter ruling from the IRS National Office when you want to know the tax impact of some strategy or transaction you are considering. Such a ruling is like insurance. As long as you give full and accurate details of the proposed transaction, you can rely on the ruling. (You cannot rely on private letter rulings issued to other taxpayers, but you can study them for signs of how the IRS views particular transactions.)

A small medical business might seek a letter ruling to be sure, for instance, that fringe-benefit plans or corporate restructuring will be tax-free.

Example

—A company was engaged in two businesses, A and B. The company needed capital to finance B’s new technology product. It found a venture capitalist willing to invest in B, but not in A. So the company sought to spin off B to a new corporation. The IRS said that there would be no tax on the transaction.

If your transaction will achieve the desired results, the IRS may suggest ways you can fix it. If the IRS plans to issue a negative ruling, it may offer you a chance to withdraw your request.

Technical advice memos

—Similar to letter rulings, these also come from the IRS National Office but are most often requested when a technical question comes up during the course of an audit. IRS agents themselves regularly request them. But, as a taxpayer, you can request such advice yourself. Technical advice memos are usually retroactive, but you can request relief from retroactivity if it would hurt you.

Technical advice memos may be issued on some of the same matters as letter rulings. Typical memos deal with such issues as whether a medical office worker is an employee or an independent contractor, validity of pension plans, and use of accounting methods.

Example

—A repairman had worked in an auto body shop for several years. Originally, he was classified as an employee. Then the shop owner turned the business over to his son, who designated the worker as an independent contractor. But the worker’s job did not change. He worked eight to 10 hours a day at the shop, using some of his own tools—but also some of the shop’s tools and equipment. He was paid half of the total amount of the bill for the repairs he did. But receiving his pay did not hinge on whether the customer paid; he took no risk. The IRS ruled in a technical advice memo that the worker was an employee.

Example

—A company asked the IRS to rule on whether its pension plan was qualified for tax breaks. The IRS said yes. A year later, the IRS realized the plan violated the rules because it excluded some workers who put in more than 1,000 hours a year. In a technical advice memo, the IRS said that the company would have to amend the plan to comply with the tax law. But because the company had relied on the IRS ruling in good faith and had originally disclosed all of the facts, the change did not have to be made retroactively.

When Not to Ask

There is no reason not to call the IRS with a basic question so you can fill out your tax return correctly. You probably will not even have to give your name. But if you want a letter ruling, first weigh the pros and cons.

In some situations—for example, to change your accounting method—you must get an advance ruling. In other cases, an advance ruling may be desirable because you want to be sure of the tax consequences of a transaction. Moreover, as we said, the IRS may suggest ways to restructure the transaction to get the tax result you want.

However, sometimes it’s unwise to seek IRS advice. You may not have time for a ruling—they generally take two or three months. Or, if the transaction offers no chance for flexibility, you will be stuck if the IRS gives you a negative response. (You must attach the ruling—favorable or not—to your return.) The National Office will review all related issues and transactions when it examines your request. So you must also be sure such scrutiny will not create a problem for you.

Cost is another factor. Fees vary by type of ruling, but a typical one would be $500. Then you need professional assistance in preparing your request and responding to IRS questions.

Assessment

The IRS will not answer every question. It will not give you a “comfort ruling”—where the answer is clear or reasonably certain. And it will not rule in hypothetical situations.

Letter rulings are public information, but you don’t lose your privacy. The IRS will have you sign a deletion statement: You can tell it to block out items that would reveal your identity. Most all physicians and medical professionals should do this.

Conclusion

Your comments are appreciated. What has been your experience with IRS queries?

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Subscribe Now:Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Medical Executive-Post.

Product Details  Product Details

“S” Corporation [Case Law] Tax Advantages

Family Owned Business [FOB]

Staff Writers

fp-book1

Some doctors understand the advantages that S corporations have over regularly taxed C corporations—and vice versa. But, an unfamiliar Tax Court decision, more than a decade ago, points up an advantage for S corporations that are sometimes overlooked.

Scenario

Suppose the owners of a family corporation are about to retire. Their children will buy their stock, giving them a note for the purchase price. The children will, of course, pay interest on the note.

Tax Difference

If the corporation is an S corporation, the younger generation will be able to write off their interest payments in full.

On the other hand, if it’s a C corporation, they may have few or no deductions.

Why the difference?

Because interest you pay to buy S corporation stock is considered “business” interest, and that’s fully deductible. On the other hand, interest paid to purchase C corporation stock is treated as “investment” interest. And the tax rules say that investment interest is deductible only to the extent of your investment income (dividends, interest income, etc.). If you don’t have any investment income, you get no deduction for your interest payments.

Naturally, that brings up another question: Why is the ownership of a C corporation considered an investment, while the ownership of an S corporation is treated as a business? For the answer to that, let’s look at the above mentioned Tax Court case.

Case Report

Three brothers, Milton, Leo, and Dale Russon, founded Russon Brothers Mortuary as a regular C corporation. The business did well, and the Russon brothers began training their four sons, Scott, Brent, Robert, and Gary, in the mortuary business.

Eventually, the four younger Russons were trained and actively involved in the business, and the older Russons were ready to hang up their hats. The younger Russons agreed to buy all the stock in Russon Brothers for $999,000. Each of the four younger Russons agreed to pay one-fourth of the purchase price, with 10% payable up front and the remainder to be paid in 180 equal monthly payments at 9% interest.

Agreement

The agreement gave the four younger Russons their right to exercise ownership rights, including “the right to all dividends from the stock,” subject to certain limitations. One of those limitations provided that the buyers could not “declare or pay any dividends or make any distributions” without written permission from the older Russons. After the sale, the four younger Russons continued to run the mortuary business, and their fathers retired.

On his tax returns following the sale, Scott Russon deducted the interest he paid on the purchase price for the Russon Brothers stock. However, the IRS denied the deduction on the grounds that the interest was subject to the investment-interest limitation.

Scott Russon countered that his interest should be treated as fully deductible business interest. After all, he bought the stock so that he and the other younger Russons could conduct the business full time and “earn a living.” Moreover, he contended that he couldn’t have purchased the stock as an investment since Russon Brothers had never paid a dividend in its entire history.

Tax Payer Loser

The Tax Court concluded that the Russon Brothers stock was “held for investment,” and the interest paid to acquire the stock was subject to the investment-interest limitation [Russon, 107 T.C. No. 15].

The court pointed out that property “held for investment” includes any property of the type which produces interest, dividend, or royalty income. And, in the court’s view, that means property that normally produces those types of income—regardless of whether it actually produces such income.

The tax law does not require corporate stock to pay a dividend before it becomes investment property. What’s more, the court pointed out that the definition of investment property is inclusive and applies uniformly to every taxpayer; it does not depend on a taxpayer’s mind-set when buying the property.

Finally, the court pointed out that the possibility of the Russon Brothers stock actually paying dividends was clearly contemplated by all the Russons when they drew up the sales agreement. The agreement gave the younger Russons the right to “all the dividends from the stock,” subject only to the written consent of the older Russons until the purchase price was fully paid.

S Corporation Advantage

If Russon Brothers had been an S corporation; it would have been a different story. The IRS has said that interest paid to buy an S corporation is treated as interest to purchase the corporation’s assets, not its stock [Notice 89-50]. Thus, the interest the Russons paid would have been treated as fully deductible business interest to the extent the assets were used in the corporation’s business [Notice 88-20]. And since virtually all of Russon Brothers’ assets were used in the active conduct of its mortuary business, Scott Russon would have been entitled to his deductions.

Assessment

There is one bright spot for astute doctors and other buyers of C corporations. You can switch. The IRS has ruled that once a C corporation is converted to an S corporation, interest paid thereafter will be treated as paid for the assets, not the stock. So your interest will become fully deductible business interest [Ltr. Rul. 9040066].

Conclusion

Of course, switching to an S corporation has other important tax consequences. So you will want to talk things over with your tax adviser before making a final decision. And so, your thoughts and comments are appreciated.

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Executive-Post.

Worthless FOB Stocks

Getting the Tax Deduction

Staff Writers

All physicians and other investors should know when their stock becomes worthless.

Example Scenario:

Some time ago, an FOB physician investor [Family Owned Business] founded two FOBs: One was doing fine while the other floundered. Under the IRS Tax Code, the investor can receive a loss deduction on the second FOB if: 1) the stock is worthless, and 2) the loss is claimed in the year it became worthless.

Definition of “Worthless”

The problem often is determining when a stock is completely “worthless”—there is no deduction for partial worthlessness. A company does not have to file for bankruptcy or end operations for its stock to be worthless.

Generally, if an FOB’s liability greatly exceeds its assets, and there is no real hope of continuing the business at a profit, the stock is considered worthless under the Tax Code. Often, to prove a worthless loss deduction, the business owner sells his or her stock at a nominal price.

Loss is Limited

The amount of the loss has traditionally been limited to the business owner’s tax basis. Capital losses are used to offset capital gain, but $3,000 can be used as a deduction against ordinary income. The $3,000 can be carried forward indefinitely.

Section 1244

If the business’s stock qualified as Section 1244 stock, the loss is an ordinary and fully deductible loss (subject to dollar limitations). In these cases, the loss is deductible against ordinary income. Obviously, if a loss is deductible against ordinary income in the first year, the taxpayer will receive a significant tax savings.

Most FOBs issue Section 1244 stock if it is qualified as a “small business corporation.”  To qualify, the total capital invested at the time the stock is issued cannot exceed $1 million. In addition, the FOB must have less than 50% of its gross receipts from passive sources: rents, royalties, dividends, and investment income.

In other words, the majority of the receipts must come from operating an active trade or business. Finally, the maximum loss is $50,000 for an individual; $100,000 for a couple. When organizing an FOB, the stock should be classified as Section 1244 stock if it qualifies.

Assessment

Financial professionals and accountants must advise their clients about “worthless” FOB stocks to ensure the deduction is claimed. Medical professionals should also be aware of this concept.

Conclusion

Have you ever had a worthless stock? How did you deal with it and what were your experiences? What has changed relative to the above review, if anything? Is Section 1244 indexed? Please opine and comment.

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Executive-Post.

 

About Tax Record Retention

Join Our Mailing List

Which Ones to Keep—How Long?

[By Staff Writers]fp-book2

By law, we are all required to keep records the IRS could use to determine our tax liability accurately. And doctors, more than most, know what it’s like to keep records. So you should retain whatever papers and documents support or clarify your calculations. If the IRS thinks you owe it money, you—both as an individual taxpayer and as a medical business owner—must prove it wrong. Your records are your only real protection if the IRS sets its sights on you for an audit.

Query: But what papers? And how long does the IRS have to determine your taxes for any given year? Do you have to keep everything forever? He following information may provide some clarity to this query.

Individual Tax Records

Accuracy means more to the IRS than the form of recordkeeping you use. Even more important is thoroughness. While certain papers are more significant than others, all of them together build your case for stated adjusted gross income, taxable income, deductions, exemptions, etc. For example:

Income:

Your medical, and other, employment-related records are top priority. The basic ones are W-2s from your hospital, clinic or medial practice, W-2P (for recipients of pensions, annuities, and IRA payouts), and 1099s for freelance income, speaking and pharmaceutical fees, and royalties, etc. You will also need 1099s that show interest and dividend income, as well as stock brokerage statements and any other documents that contain information pertaining to the amount you report as income.

Deductions

Generally, to back up your various deductions, the records you keep should include all related canceled checks and receipts. Here are some specific deductions and their requirements:

Medical expenses:

Keep all canceled checks and receipts. Keep records of any expense reimbursed or paid directly by medical insurance and medical insurance policies on which you deduct the premium cost. The person on whose behalf payments were made should be noted on every check, bill, and receipt.

Mortgage interest:

Keep bank (or mortgage company) statements, notes, and canceled checks.

Child-care credit:

Maintain a record of the name and address of the person or center providing the care, copies of canceled checks, and receipts to verify costs, and amounts paid for household services during the year. The latter will allow you to differentiate costs if the IRS tries to claim your child-care payments were really for a housekeeper. If you pay an individual to provide child care, keep a record of his or her taxpayer ID number, since you need that to get the credit.

Alimony:

You should maintain a copy of the divorce decree, separate maintenance agreement, or other document that specified the basis for the payments; name and address of the ex-spouse to whom you made payments; and canceled alimony checks. If you made payments indirectly through insurance policies, annuity contracts, or endowments, keep the documents showing the source of the payments.

Charitable contributions:

To prove charitable contributions, keep canceled checks and receipts showing the donee’s name, plus the date and amount of the contributions. If you don’t have a check, you need other reliable records showing the same information. If contributions are made by credit card, keep the receipt, the bill, and a statement from the charity with the required information. If you make a contribution of above certain periodically indexed thresholds, or more, to a particular charity, you must get a written acknowledgment from the charity (letter, postcard, etc.). A canceled check is not enough. Generally speaking, if you make separate deminimus contributions each year, the written acknowledgment rule may not apply.

A donation of property will complicate recordkeeping. You need the same items as above, plus a description of the property and the place you made the contribution. You should also keep documents showing the method you used to determine the fair market value of the property, with a signed copy of appraisal reports, if any. If you have an agreement with the charitable organization regarding the use of the donated property, hang on to a copy of that as well.

For property, you will also need documents showing how and why you acquired the property and your cost or other basis (except for publicly traded securities) if you held it for less than one year. For property valued over certain thresholds, you must get a qualifying appraisal and keep a copy of the report

IRS

Business Tax Records

As a medical business owner, your recordkeeping requirements are more substantial. There are so many more soft spots where the IRS can probe. The following areas are of particular importance:

Depreciation:

Keep any records needed to establish the reasonableness of a depreciation deduction, such as the original sales receipt showing what you paid for the property. Records must show the yearly depreciation claimed.

Withholding:

Keep all compensation records. For each employee, show name, address, job, and Social Security number, total amount and date of each wage payment, and any other type or form of payment; amount of wages subject to withholding; amount of tax collected; employee W-4 forms; and any agreement with employees regarding additional withholding.

Travel and entertainment:

The IRS does not accept estimates. You must keep itemized bills and receipts, Back them up with a diary showing cost, time, place of travel or entertainment, business purpose, and business relationship of guests.

Also, you must keep a log of your business use of items, such as a car, pager, computer, or server; or PDA, ipod or cell phone, etc., that you use partly for business and partly for personal purposes. For travel, your diary should show the date of departure and return, plus how many days of the total trip were spent on business. If you are an independent medical contractor, keep a diary of your daily work activities. This will reinforce the specific items and pull them together.

How Long to Retain Records?

By law, you have to keep tax records “as long as material” to the administration of the tax law. Since the statute of limitations runs for three years from the time you file your return or the due date of the return (whichever is later), and the IRS is free to audit your return during this time, you want to keep the records at least that long. After an assessment, the IRS has six years to begin collecting, so you are up to nine years. But you then have two years to claim a refund after payment, giving you a grand total of 11 years.

This may seem extreme, and not everyone keeps records that long. Many individuals keep records for six years—the amount of time the IRS has to audit if it suspects a gross error—an underreporting of 25% or more of the gross income shown on your return.

The 11-year time frame is the maximum time frame for assessment, collection, and refund claim. Business owners would be wise to use that period as a rule of thumb, even if individual taxpayers don’t.

Homeowners—

Keep any documents connected to home ownership that have a bearing on your taxes, if any, for the entire time you own your home. If you sell your home, keep the documents as long after the last tax filing as they have a bearing on your tax records. Remember the newer rules for homeowner tax exemption.

Withholding—

These records are subject to a special four-year retention rule. Most doctors and medical business owners keep them longer.

Fraud

In the case of fraud, there is no limit on the time the IRS has to charge you. But here, the burden of proof shifts to the IRS, and you get the presumption of innocence. So you need not feel you have to keep records forever to protect yourself against such an accusation. 

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details  Product Details

Dining and IRS Induced Gastroenteritis

Join Our Mailing List

Doctor’s Beware Taxation on Rebates

[By Staff Writers]

In the past decade or so, several companies has been marketing a culinary twist on airline frequent flyer programs—a kind of frequent-eater program.

Under the program, doctors who love to hold “business meetings”, and other diners use their regular credit cards to charge meals at participating restaurants, and the program sends them a rebate check for 20% of the bill.

Not All Gravy

While a 20% discount on restaurant meals sounds appealing to most everyone, you should be aware that it’s not all gravy. In some cases, the IRS is likely to take the position that those rebate checks represent taxable income to a medical executive who is using the program for business dining.

The IRS has not specifically addressed the issue of rebates on restaurant bills. But, in a private letter ruling back in 1993, it did give examples of when cash frequent flyer awards will be taxed [Ltr. Rul. 934007]. Here are some examples:

Example 1—

Your medical practice buys you tickets for a medical conference trip. The tickets entitle you to a cash payment under the airline’s frequent flyer program. If you do not turn the cash payment over to your company, the IRS says you have received a taxable fringe benefit.

Example 2—

You pay for air flights for which you take a business expense deduction. You subsequently receive a cash frequent flyer award. In this case, the IRS says you have taxable income to the extent that your prior deduction saved you taxes.

Back to the Table

Now, let’s get back to the discount dining program. By analogy to the IRS rulings, if you are reimbursed by your practice for the full amount charged on your credit card, the IRS will view the 20% rebate check as a taxable fringe benefit that must be reported on your tax return.

Or, suppose you are a self-employed doctor and take a deduction based on the full amount of the meals charged on the credit card. The cash rebate would be taxable to the extent the deduction produced tax savings. (Note: Since only 50% of the cost of business meals is deductible, only 50% of the rebate check will have produced tax savings.)

Practice Angle

How your medical practice decides to address the issue of dining discounts may be more a matter of tactics, than taxes.  In theory, allowing its employees to pocket their dining discounts could jeopardize the tax-free treatment of business meal reimbursements for all employees.

For example, in a 1995 ruling, the IRS said that a company’s travel reimbursement arrangement did not qualify for tax-free treatment because employees were permitted to retain frequent flyer awards for their own personal use [Ltr. Rul. 9547001].

However, the ruling aroused a storm of controversy, and higher-ups at the IRS quickly announced that they would reconsider the ruling in limbo. But, it is very likely that the company in question triggered its own tax troubles by making the right to retain frequent flyer miles an official part of its reimbursement plan, rather than an unofficial “perk” for employees.

***

IRS

***

Assessment

The IRS may be less likely to raise the tax issue if a medical practice plan has no policy on rebates and awards, or officially requires employees to account for them to the company. And so, is this an example of the “friendlier IRS” that a former tax-commissioner spoke about, or that was mentioned in a previous Medical Executive-Post? Did we miss anything else? Has anything changed recently? Please opine and comment?

Channel Surfing the ME-P

Have you visited our other topic channels? Established to facilitate idea exchange and link our community together, the value of these topics is dependent upon your input. Please take a minute to visit. And, to prevent that annoying spam, we ask that you register. It is fast, free and secure.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details  Product Details

Selecting Tax-Return Preparers

What Doctors Need to Know about Preparers

Staff Writers

Most doctors and medical professionals are not thinking about tax season right now. But, according to Executive-Post supporter Rachel Pentin-Maki; RN, MHA “now may be the best time to rethink your relationship with your tax-preparer.”

All Tax Preparer’s not equal!

All tax return preparers are not the same. They possess varying levels of expertise and hold different credentials. If you are thinking about hiring a new tax preparer to do your 2008 return next year, you may want to begin your search soon so you have sufficient time to investigate and evaluate your options.

Specialty Needs

If you are aware of any significant tax issues when doing your return, find out if he or she has expertise in this area. For example, a recently divorced single father will want a tax return preparer that is knowledgeable about the tax ramifications of divorce and how it affects his return. Similarly, if you’ve recently sold a rental property at a loss, you’ll want a preparer who can advise you on reporting that loss.

Of course, medical specificity is paramount. An accountant who has many doctor-clients is a good start, but does he/she really know anything about activity based medical cost accounting?

Experience Counts

It’s usually wise to select a preparer who has been in the tax business for at least several years. However, should you opt to go with a less experienced preparer, be sure that individual has access to more experienced professionals who can address any complex tax issues that may arise during the preparation of your tax-return?

Types and Stripes

The complexity of your return, and not necessarily the amount of your income, should guide you in selecting a tax preparer, and resulting professional fees. Essentially, there are five types of preparers:

Certified Public Accountants (CPAs)—

These accountants have passed a rigorous examination which includes an entire section on tax issues. Many specialize in taxes and are experienced in handling complicated tax issues. In addition, if they are members of the American Institute of CPAs [AICPA], they must meet stringent continuing education requirements to maintain their memberships.

Commercial Agents—

These individuals work for large national organizations. They usually work only during tax season and have been trained by the organization. Most are form-driven. They are not, however, required to have a minimum level of education, nor have they passed an exam administered by a regulatory body.

Enrolled Agents—

These tax return preparers must pass a two-day examination given by the Internal Revenue Service or meet an lRS experience requirement. In addition, members of the National Association of Enrolled Agents or its state chapters must take at least 30 hours of class work in tax matters each year.

Public Accountants—

Many public accountants are tax advisers. These individuals have not taken the exams and are not obligated to meet the experience requirements of CPAs. In some states, public accountants must be licensed, but in others, anyone can claim the title.

Tax attorneys—

Like CPAs, tax attorneys must meet continuing education requirements and are subject to regulations by the states where they practice. Most tax attorneys don’t specialize in tax return preparation. Instead, they tend to be more involved in tax planning and tax litigation.

Fees

Some tax return preparers work for a fixed fee while others charge hourly rates. In either case, be sure to clarify in advance how much or on what basis the preparer will charge you to do your return. Keep in mind that it’s up to you to provide the preparer with the information necessary to do your return. Unorganized or missing files and receipts are likely to result in more work for the preparer and higher costs for you.

Assessment

Keep in mind, too, that only enrolled agents, CPAs, and tax attorneys are authorized to practice before the IRS. This means that they can represent you throughout the entire IRS audit process; commercial agents and public accountants may not.

Conclusion

What has been your experience with the above accounting types? Is medical specificity really required? Please comment, opine and send us your “tax preparer war-stories.”

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Executive-Post.

Corporate Minutes and IRS Tax Savings

It Pays for Doctors to Keep Good Records

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™

[Publisher-in-Chief]Dr. David E. Marcinko MBA

More than a few medical professionals have ownership in small corporations outside of their medical practice, or day-job as physician-healers. More are contemplating same, as the healthcare insurance crisis grows, and the social and economic swagger of physicians decrease.

Small Corporations

But, some of these doctor-involved small corporations generally are not too formal in their day-to-day operations. Formality could even interfere with effective functioning of the emerging matrix business environment. On the other hand, doctors are notoriously stubborn, egotistical and business directors, officers and shareholders are usually the same few people. They are in contact daily. They might easily agree on a capital expenditure during a chance meeting in the stairwell, hospital, clinic, medical office or golf course,

Annual Meetings

But, if the formal procedures of large corporations seem out of place in the closely held corporation, holding an annual meeting and recording all matters in corporate minutes is not as pointless as it may appear.

Accurate and complete corporation minutes can produce real tax savings. The IRS keeps a sharp watch on closely held corporations. Corporate minutes can provide an excellent—and sometimes the only—defense against possible unfavorable tax consequences.

How Minutes Count

Corporations often enjoy a favorable tax rate compared to their owner’s personal rates. They also benefit from deductions and credits an individual or unincorporated business cannot get. But, to get all the tax benefits due you, you should make business decisions in a way that shows sound business purpose and intent. Your corporate minutes are proof of your good intentions should you ever be audited by the IRS.

Corporate Minutes

Corporate minutes have a particular format, just as the problem orientated medical record [POMR] that we are all familiar with, has its own style. For example, corporate minutes, along with receipts, invoices, and correspondence, serve as evidence in several important areas: 

Executive Compensation

Your minutes should show that any salary increase for an executive or officer has been formally approved and ratified by the board of directors. The basis for the raise should be noted in detail. Minutes should include relevant factors which can justify a raise such as: expanded job duties and/or time, contributions to company growth, and the need to match competitors’ salaries.

The minutes should also describe the scope of the job and what the increase will be. Such information is designed to satisfy the IRS and the courts that the compensation is reasonable and the increase is legitimate. With this information, the IRS is less likely to suspect that you are using a raise to disguise a dividend. Both dividends and compensation are taxable to the recipient. But dividends, unlike compensation, cannot be deducted by the corporation.

Date Protection

Dates of the minutes that support the increase can be extra protection. The minutes can show that the decision was made and implemented well before year-end earnings could be accurately projected. Large raises or across-the-board increases granted close to year end, when earnings are high, lead the IRS to see dividends in disguise.

Loan Verifications

Corporate minutes also verify that loans made to executives are loans and not taxable compensation or dividends. They also confirm the nature of such corporate largesse as gifts to individuals (such as to the surviving spouse of a deceased senior executive). Since the IRS considers intention in business actions, your minutes can show that you have sound business motives from the start.

Keep in mind, however, that loans from the corporation to employee/ shareholders must meet other criteria. Nothing you have in writing, including the minutes, will win the day if your loans appear to be dividends. If you fail to repay them, pay interest on them, provide collateral, etc., there is a good chance the IRS will rule that the advances are dividends.

Excess Accumulated Earnings

Corporations can accumulate earnings of up to certain indexed limits. Anything above that may face an excess accumulated earnings tax. Under some circumstances you may keep earnings above the limit without penalty; this is common in scientific and health technology fields. Some of the acceptable reasons for excess accumulation are:

• plans to expand or diversify

• plans to buy new equipment or build up inventory

• projected investment in business-related properties

• to maintain working capital as a hedge against borrowing

• to make loans needed to maintain business

• to provide for actual-potential lawsuits, contested tax or profit loss

• to meet profit-sharing and pension plan obligations

Your plans can be immediate or long-range. They just have to be for a reasonable business purpose. Dates when plans were made and details as to their implementation, when included in corporate minutes, supply proof of that. If you include estimates, market analysis, receipts, and other related documentation of the purpose as part of the record, you will add weight to your case.

Step Transactions

Corporate minutes can also perform the same function for step-transactions. Step transactions consist of steps taken over time toward achieving one objective. Such plans, if recorded in your corporate minutes, can justify your holding on to excess earnings without tax penalty. Even if the plan is abandoned at any “step,” you can state the reasons in your minutes and effectively forestall a penalty.

Retirement and other Pension Plans

To obtain maximum tax savings for your business and your employees, any pension, profit-sharing, or stock-option plan has to satisfy IRS rules. If it does, your employees defer taxes on your contributions and their investment earnings until those funds are distributed to them. Your corporation gets a tax deduction for its contributions.

To get IRS approval, you must submit documentary evidence supporting your plan along with your application. Your corporate minutes supply some of that evidence. They should show the date the plan was adopted and ratified, contain figures demonstrating financial ability, and show that the plan was intended to be permanent. Once you have obtained IRS approval, your annual contributions should be detailed in succeeding corporate minutes to protect your corporate deductions.

Dividends

Your corporate minutes play a part in determining the taxable nature of dividends. Generally, a dividend paid out in the form of stock isn’t taxable to the shareholder until the stock is sold. Dividends paid in cash or property is taxable income in the year they are paid. But if shareholders can choose between taking a dividend in stock or in cash or property, the dividend is taxable to them no matter which method they elect.

To settle such tax questions (and get the best tax results for you), your corporate minutes should clearly reflect the form of dividend being offered to stockholders.

Mergers, Consolidations, etc

To earn tax-exempt status, the minutes must show that a merger or other action serves a bona fide business purpose. It’s OK if the merger will save you taxes, but there must be a business reason as well. For instance, the reorganization will enable you to cut costs, or the merger will bring needed technical skills to the business. The minutes should include a specific plan for the transaction and how it is to be carried out.

Corporate Meetings

One reason for a closely held corporation to hold a “formal” annual meeting is to create corporate minutes. Tax advantages can be further ensured by holding other meetings and recording minutes whenever any major business decision is made. Neither a board meeting nor the corporate minutes recording it need be elaborate or time-consuming. There is not a required format for minutes. Their value lies in what they say, not how they say it, although accuracy and clarity count.

One company officer must be the “secretary,” responsible for calling the meeting, notifying members, drawing up the agenda, and distributing it in advance. The secretary is also responsible for recording the date, time, and place of the meeting, the attendance, and all important matters settled (although someone else can physically take the notes). After the minutes have been prepared, the secretary distributes copies to all board members (and the company attorney). Getting their signatures on the minutes isn’t necessary but can be helpful.

Assessment

Don’t waste time trying to record every point that’s brought up at the meeting. Enter only final decisions. In a closely held corporation, most of the discussion has probably preceded the actual meeting. The meeting serves only to formalize those final decisions—and essential details—for the record.

Conclusion

What is missing from the above, if anything? Your experiences and comments are appreciated.

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Executive-Post.

IRS Offers-in-Compromise

Understanding the IRS Tax Reform Act

By Staff Writers

In 1998, the IRS received 105,255 offers-in-compromise, but accepted only 25,052 offers—a mere 24%; and the exact number for medical professionals is unknown.

The IRS Reform Act

However, the IRS Reform Act later revamped the provisions for offers-in-compromise and the IRS, reacting to the changes, announced that it would be more flexible in considering offers-in-compromise in the future. In addition, under new rules, taxpayers can have up to two years to pay the accepted compromise amount.

Re-trained Staff

The IRS now trains staff specifically to handle such offers. In accordance with the Act, rejected offers will be reviewed to determine whether the action was in the best interest of the taxpayer. The IRS has updated Form 656 to process the offers.

Submitting the Offer

When submitting an offer-in-compromise, the offer must specify the maximum amount a taxpayer can pay after taking into account basic living expenses. Essentially, this means the IRS will consider each taxpayer’s financial situation individually. But, college education for children is an expense most people pay, yet the IRS generally does not factor in educational expenses when determining a taxpayer’s living expenses. .

In the past, the IRS relied on a standard cost-of-living formula to determine what taxpayers could afford, not on each taxpayer’s own expenses.

The IRS automatically can accept offers if: 1) there is doubt about the liability for the tax, and 2) there is doubt that the taxpayer can ever pay the full amount of the tax. If a taxpayer is claiming there is doubt about the liability, the taxpayer will need the help of a tax professional to spell out the rationale for his or her position. If the offer is based on inability to pay, the financial information in the worksheets to the IRS, Form 656, should be completed.

Quick-Sale Value

Remember, as a medical professional or other, the IRS can consider the taxpayer’s future income, as well as his or her current assets when evaluating an offer. Individuals can exclude certain minimum assets of household effects, and trade and business tools. The value of the taxpayer’s assets is based upon a “quick-sale” valuation. Again the taxpayer may need to help to justify his financial position.

The key is determining the full value of the assets and the discounts for quick sales, in addition to the taxpayer’s living expenses. An amount higher than the IRS standard generally cannot be permitted. Again, this will be based on the taxpayer’s documentation.

Collection Procedures

The IRS’s ability to begin collection procedures while an offer-in-compromise is under consideration has been sharply limited by the Act. This is true even if after an offer is rejected, but the taxpayer appeals the decision.

Cash offers must be paid within 90 days of acceptance. For deferrals, payments must be made within two years after the offer is accepted. Alternately, the taxpayer can pay the offer over the statutory period for collecting the tax.

Innocent Spouse Rule

The IRS also has added innocent spouse relief to offers-in-compromise, so now the IRS will not collect from a taxpayer’s spouse if the taxpayer defaults on his or her compromise agreement.

Assessment

As noted previously the taxpayer has a right to appeal rejected offers. In addition, he or she can submit another offer. But, in the end, only time will tell if the IRS remains taxpayer friendly.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and experiences are appreciated; please comment and opine. Is this a real or perceived new IRS OiC ploy? IOW: The gentler side of Uncle Sam? 

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Subscribe Now:Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Medical Executive-Post.

Product Details  Product Details

Alimony versus Child Support

Tax Consequences for Physicians

[By Staff Writers]

Tax considerations are critical when preparing divorce agreements; and an understanding of the applicable sections of the Tax Code is essential for all medical professions in this situation.

In short, alimony is deductible for the payer while child support is not; so it is important for a separation agreement to stipulate that taxpayers report the payments in the same manner. If the person making the payment reports it as alimony, the recipient must include it in income.

The IRS Code Rules

However, when determining whether payments made to a former spouse are alimony or child support, the IRS looks not merely at the agreement, but at how the payments are used. The Code has specific rules for alimony. The payments must be: 

  • Made pursuant to a divorce decree or separation agreement,
  • Made by a payer who is not living in the same household as the recipient, and
  • Payments may not extend beyond the lifetime of either the payer or the recipient.

The last provision can be a trap under some divorce decrees. For example, a doctor makes monthly installments designated as alimony. However, lump-sum payments also designated as alimony are payable under the agreement. In some states, such payments must be made even if the former spouse dies. Alimony payments are not deductible when made to a former spouse after he or she has died.

Front Loaded Payments

In some divorce decrees, alimony payments are front-loaded. Large alimony payments are made in the early years, and then payments dwindle later on. The IRS sometimes challenges whether these arrangements actually are alimony. Property transferred during marriage that is incident to the divorce is not alimony. Such transfers have no tax consequences and should not be claimed as alimony.

Exceptions

While most physician-payers want support payments to be deductible, there are exceptions. In a recent case, the divorce decree ordered one spouse to pay alimony. However, the payer had very little taxable income. Most of his income was from tax-exempt bonds. After negotiations, it was agreed that the payer would not take the alimony deduction, and the recipient spouse would exclude the payment from income.

Child Support

Child support is not deductible for the payer, and the recipient may exclude it from income. However, the parent who has custody of the child or children receives the dependency exemption, but the parties can agree that the payer will receive the exemption(s), provided he or she contributes more than 50% to the costs of the child’s support.

For the non-custodial parent to claim the dependency exemption(s), IRS Form 8322 must be signed by the custodial parent and filed with the IRS. But, you may claim the exemption in alternating years, if you wish.

Assessment

In sum, when negotiating a divorce settlement, there are a number of tax traps to avoid. In some cases the payer may not want alimony payments to be deductible. In other cases payments designated as alimony may not qualify under the Code. The medical business advisor and attorney must determine what is best for his or her client.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Product Details  Product Details

Hospitals Auctioning Patient Debt

Online Sale of Patient ARs

Staff Reporters

In another sign of the contracting economic times, FierceHealthFinance is reporting that some struggling hospitals are using the internet as a new channel to cut their write-offs, and bad debt ratios which lower stock prices, if publicly-held.

Exit the Debt Collectors – Enter the Auctioneers

Rather than simply hiring agencies to collect patient bills, some hospitals have begun to put ARs up for auction online. Bidders on the debt include the same agencies that serve the hospitals, some of which provide guaranteed payments to hospitals in exchange for access to the debt. The auctions are also attracting other companies that buy the debt outright.  

Intermediary Channels

Many of these auctions are run through intermediary channels like www.ARxChange.com, a TriCap Technology Group site; while others use www.medipent.com Medipent LLC. The companies vet collectors to see that they will use the right tactics before participating in auctions, and also, try to make sure they comply with the hospital standards for collections. Also, hospitals have the final say over who bids on their accounts.

Critics

Despite safeguards, some critics argue that auctions change the dynamics of hospital collections, unfavorably. Usually, collectors are paid a percentage of what they collect, sometimes more when they collect more. But, in many of these cases, winning bidders get to keep all of the money they collect. This gives them a greater incentive to be aggressive in their tactics, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Assessment

When will debt-auctioning filter down to the individual clinic and medical practice level? “It is only a matter of time”, according to industry expert Hope Rachel Hetico; RN, MHA, CMP™ of Atlanta, Georgia

Conclusion

Your thoughts, opinions and comments are appreciated?

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Executive-Post.

Professionally Managed Portfolios and Mutual Funds

Advantages and Disadvantages for Physician Investors

[By Staff Writers]

Join Our Mailing List

The following briefly summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of professionally managed portfolios and mutual funds according to size and taxation factors.

Portfolio Size

A major factor that impacts the selection process is the size of the physician-investor’s portfolio. For example, is there a size at which it makes more sense to use managed portfolios?

Except for large portfolios [>$3 – 5 million dollars, USD], mutual fund portfolios can meet most physician investors’ needs. Investors who need substantial individual attention should also consider managed portfolios (perhaps in conjunction with funds or ETFs to add additional asset classes).

Income Tax Consideration

Professionally managed portfolios often offer the physician greater control over the timing of taxable transactions.

For example, at the end of the tax year, it may be appropriate to defer capital gains that would otherwise incur, or conversely, the doctor may wish to accelerate recognition of capital losses.

Mutual funds do not allow physicians or other individual investors to influence the timing of these types of transactions. On the other hand, private portfolio managers are often sensitive to a client’s specific income tax planning needs.

In addition, mutual funds are required to distribute 95% of capital gains recognized during the year. These gains are taxable to shareholders of record on the date of the capital gains distribution, even if the shareholder did not benefit from the gains.

For example, a doctor-shareholder who invests in a mutual fund near the end of the year may pay taxes on gains that were incurred earlier in the year when the fund manager was required to sell securities to raise cash for the purpose of redeeming shares of other investors.

***

***

Assessment

The problem is accentuated in long-term bull markets, where the recognized gains in one year result from an income tax basis to the fund that was established in past years, when the find manager bought securities at very low prices. Private portfolios have the advantage that clients normally are not penalized for events that occurred before they invested with a portfolio manager.

MORE: Vehicles

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

 

 Product Details

Product Details  Product Details

Hospital Stock and Taxes?

Q: I am a hospital employee. What are the ways that I can acquire stock in my public company without current cash activity; i.e.; taxes; any thoughts?

For example, at this time I do know it is important that any loans be subject to full recourse liability.

I also understand that if the loan is secured by the stock on a non-recourse basis, the transaction may be treated as if it were a grant of an option, and thus there would be no transfer of property until the loan is paid.

Thanks for your help. 

Dr. William Henry Biggerstaff

Costa Mesa, CA  

Hospital IRS Form 990 Tax Burden

Join Our Mailing List

New Schedules – H and K – for Non-Profits

[By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™]dem21

As quarterly premium print-subscribers to Healthcare Organizations [Financial Management Strategies] know, the IRS redesigned Form 990 last year.

Form 990 Burden

The new Form 990 is controversial among not-for-profit hospitals (Schedule H) and tax-exempt bond issuers (Schedule K). Schedule H requires hospitals to provide new information on operations, including community benefit levels, charity care, aggregate bad debt expense, Medicare shortfall information and more.

Input Request

Now, the IRS is asking for healthcare sector input to promote uniform reporting, and make sure the form is simple enough for public use. So, through June 1 of this year, Uncle Sam is accepting comments on Form 990 draft instructions. And, the agency will post all comments on its website.

Hospital

FORM: IRS Form 990

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details  Product Details

Product Details

Revisiting EGTRRA-2001

Basic Estate Tax Law Changes from EGTRRA-2001

Staff Writers

 

For some doctors, estate taxes will decline under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, and about 2% of all taxpayers will be able to bequeath more to their heirs on a tax-free basis, up to one million dollars.

The amount exempted from estate taxes rose to $1 million in 2002 and to $3.5 million by 2009. The estate tax will not expire completely until January 2010. After that, the estate tax repeal is scheduled to last only one year. Congress must then either repeal the tax by December 31st, 2010, or the tax will revert to present day rates.

Some economists opine that this is an accounting artifact designed to curb the cost of legislation.  

The law also gradually reduced the estate and gift tax rates to 45%, from 55%, by 2007.

 

How will EGTRRA-2001 affect you going forward?

Annuity Taxation Basics

The Annuity Taxation Primer for Physicians

By: Gary A. Cook, MSFS, CFP®, CLU, ChFC, RHU, LUTCF, CMP™ (Hon); with Kathy D. Belteau, CFP®, CLU, ChFC, FLMI, and Philip E. Taylor, CLU, ChFC, FLMI insurance-book

Introduction  

The tax treatment of annuities is dependent on whether it is a qualified or non-qualified annuity.  Although both permit the tax-deferred growth of the investment and both have penalties for early distributions, they are governed under different sections of the IRC. 

Qualified Annuity Taxation

Qualified annuities are treated no different than any other tax-qualified retirement investment.  Growth of the investment, whether fixed interest or variable-based, escapes current taxation under one of the 400-series IRC sections. 

Additionally, if the funds are withdrawn prior to age 59½, there is a 10 percent penalty.  As the money is withdrawn, every dollar is taxed as ordinary income.  

Finally, fund distributions must begin no later than April 1 of the calendar year following the year when the owner turns age 70½.

Non-Qualified Annuity Taxation 

The taxation of non-qualified annuities is generally contained within IRC § 72.  Again, the annuity is provided tax-deferred growth and the 10 percent penalty for early withdrawal.  The manner that distributions are taken, however, will determine the nature of their taxation.

Withdrawals

Withdrawals from non-qualified annuities are taxed in one of two ways depending upon when the annuity was issued.  Annuities issued prior to 8/14/82 had FIFO accounting (first in, first out). Since principal was first in, it came out first, tax-free.  With annuities issued on 8/14/82 and thereafter, taxation changed to LIFO (last in, first out). Simply put, withdrawals are now taxable since interest is withdrawn first.  

However, if annuitization is chosen, the insurance company using governmental tables develops an exclusion ratio.  This permits a portion of each received payment to be considered a return of principle and thus only a portion of each payment is taxable.  This exclusion ratio remains in effect until the insurance company has returned all of the original principle to the owner.  After that, every payment received will be considered 100 percent earnings and totally subject to ordinary income taxation. 

The 10% Excise Penalty Tax      

Just like an IRA, there is a 10% excise tax penalty on premature withdrawals for deferred annuities.  The government extends tax advantages to the annuity for retirement purposes. The government also extends tax disadvantages to taxpayers who do not use the annuity for retirement. All interest withdrawn prior to the owner being age 59½ will be subject to a 10% excise tax penalty.  

Exceptions to this penalty tax are disability of taxpayer, distribution from a pre 8/14/82 annuity, death of the owner, payout from an immediate annuity or substantially equal payments over the taxpayer’s life expectancy.

Wealth Transfer Issues

Regardless of whether the medical professional or healthcare practitioner has a qualified or non-qualified annuity, extreme care must be given when specifying beneficiaries.  Although these investments have great potential for appreciating sizable amounts of wealth during a lifetime, they are, unfortunately, very poor vehicles for the transfer of this wealth to successor generations after death.

Upon the death of an annuity owner, an annuity can be subject to both federal estate and federal income taxes.  This double taxation often results in a 40 to 70 percent loss of annuity value before the heirs can receive it.   The retired medical professional should seek wealth transfer advice if he/she holds a large portion of their wealth in annuities or other qualified plans such as IRAs. One good strategy to consider may be the Stretch IRA. 

Conclusion

As always, your thoughts and comments on this Executive-Post are appreciated.

Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759 

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790 

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com 

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos