PHYSICIANS: Alimony V. Palimony

By A.I. and Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

What is Alimony

According to Hello Divorce, alimony, often referred to as spousal support, is a court-ordered payment from one spouse to the other following a divorce or legal separation. Its existence is tied to the legal status of marriage. The underlying principle is that both spouses contributed to the marital standard of living, and the dissolution of the marriage should not cause an inequitable economic outcome for the lower-earning spouse. This support is not intended as a punishment but as a means of mitigating the financial impact of divorce.

The purpose of alimony can vary. In some cases, it is rehabilitative, providing temporary support while one spouse obtains education or job training to become self-sufficient. For longer marriages, it might serve to help maintain the standard of living established during the partnership. Alimony is a legal tool derived from family law statutes to address the financial interdependence created by marriage.

DIVORCE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/08/14/physician-divorce-within-the-medical-profession/

Note: The federal tax treatment for alimony changed with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. For any divorce or separation agreement executed after December 31st, 2018, alimony payments are no longer tax-deductible for the person paying them. The recipient of the support does not report the payments as taxable income. This change is permanent and does not expire with other provisions of the act.

What is Palimony

According to Wikipedia, Palimony refers to financial support that may be awarded after an unmarried couple separates. Unlike alimony, palimony is not rooted in family law but is a concept derived from contract law. An award depends on the existence of an agreement between the partners. This agreement can be a formal written contract or an oral or implied agreement for support in exchange for services, such as managing the household.

The legal basis for palimony was established by the 1976 California Supreme Court case, Marvin v. Marvin. In that case, the court ruled that unmarried cohabitants could make enforceable contracts for support, as long as the agreement was not based on sexual services. Because it is a contract claim, a palimony case is pursued in civil court, not family court. Palimony is not available in all states and is only recognized in a minority of jurisdictions.

MEDIATION: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2023/08/12/a-step-wise-approach-to-the-divorce-mediation-process-for-doctors/

Note: The tax implications of palimony are less defined than alimony because the IRS does not have a specific rule for it. How palimony is treated depends on the nature of the underlying claim. If the payments are a settlement for services rendered, they may be considered taxable income to the recipient. If the payments are characterized as a gift, they are not considered taxable income for the recipient.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Like and Subscribe

***

***

PHYSICIAN DIVORCE: “Buyer’s Settlement Remorse”

By A.I and Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Introduction

It is normal for physician litigants to develop a case of “buyer’s remorse” after any mediation or divorce settlement. They may feel disappointed after entering into a settlement agreement or feel that they received a bad deal.

PHYSICIAN DIVORCE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2025/08/14/physician-divorce-within-the-medical-profession/

Mediation: Some advantages of divorce mediation over divorce litigation include:

◊ Mediation is generally faster and less costly.

◊ Mediation is voluntary, private and confidential.

◊ Mediation facilitates creative and realistic solutions.

◊ Mediation allows parties to control their agreements.

◊ Mediation eliminates a win-lose atmosphere and result.

◊ Mediation provides a forum for addressing future disputes.

◊ Mediation fosters communication and helps mend relationships.

***

***

Settlement

And so, in a vast majority of cases, mediation and settlement is probably a good deal. In fact, it is probably a great deal because you are receiving something without having to risk losing. Remember, trial can be a crap-shoot, and nothing is worse than losing it all at the time of trial.

  • Bench trial verdict by a trial judge.
  • Jury trial verdict by your “peers.”

Instead, you entered into a settlement agreement and now your divorce case is over.

But beware since trying to get out of a settlement agreement reached at mediation or settlement is virtually impossible.

Why? Well, there is a strong interest by the court to enforce mediation and settlement agreements. The court wants your divorce case to be over and off its docket. There are a few very narrow exceptions; for example, if one party was truly coerced because someone held a gun to their head. But that rarely happens, and it certainly doesn’t happen to most doctors or dentists.

MEDIATION: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/09/15/financially-egalitarian-dating-marriages-and-divorce-mediation-for-doctors/

Re-litigate?

Of course, you can fight against your mediation or settlement agreement if you like, but you won’t get too far. There’s an old adage in the law that a bad settlement is better than a great trial. That’s because no one knows how a judge or jury will rule come time of trial.

***

***

This buyers remorse phenomenon also isn’t uncommon among people who receive sudden wealth, whether through divorce settlements, inheritances, lottery winnings, or other windfalls.

Assessment

Financial advisors often see clients struggle with “sudden wealth syndrome”—the inability to properly manage a large sum of money they’re not accustomed to having.

Common mistakes include:

  • Lifestyle inflation without sustainable income to support it.
  • Poor investment decisions or lack of investment planning.
  • Emotional spending following traumatic life events like divorce.
  • Failure to set aside money for taxes on the settlement.
  • Not creating a long-term financial plan for the money.

So, do not let these mistakes happen to you!

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like and Subscribe

***

***

ASSET PROTECTION: Records Verification

By Rick Kahler MSFP CFP®

***

***

OVER HEARD IN THE FINANCIAl ADVISOR’S LOUNGE

A basic strategy for asset protection is to hold various assets in different entities. Putting real estate, small businesses, and other assets into trusts, corporations, or limited liability companies (LLCs) is effective protection that is relatively easy to put into practice. Not only do I recommend this strategy to clients, I use it myself. Recently, however, I discovered a potential downside.

About 25 years ago, I invested in some rare coins in a corporation I owned and put them into a safe deposit box owned by the corporation. When my business relocated 12 years ago, the safe deposit box billing was not forwarded to the new address and was never paid again. Last year I went to retrieve the coins from the safe deposit box, which I had not visited in 25 years. I discovered the box had been drilled open three years earlier and my collection turned over to the unclaimed property division of the State Treasurer’s office.

I was told getting the coins back would be simple enough. I just needed to verify that I owned the company which owned them by providing the corporation’s tax ID number. However, the corporation no longer existed. I didn’t have a record of its tax ID number. The IRS wouldn’t verify the number without my giving them the address the company had used. That address was a post office box number that I no longer used and couldn’t remember. The state’s position was “no tax ID, no coins.” The only verification of my identity as owner of the corporation was my signature on the bank’s safe deposit box application. Eventually, with the support of bank officers who were willing to swear that I was who I claimed to be, I got my coin collection back.  The hassle involved in this process was a reminder of an important component of asset protection. Maintain accurate records so you don’t end up hiding assets from yourself.

***

***

A good start is to create a master file of all the entities that hold your assets. This can be any system that’s easy for you to use: a computer spreadsheet, a set of file folders, or a single paper list. Share it as appropriate with your CPA, attorney, or financial planner. The master list should include the name of each company, its date of incorporation, tax ID number, address, and other relevant information like phone or bank account numbers. Also keep an inventory of the assets each company owns.

Once you’ve created a master list, it’s essential to keep it up to date as you buy or sell assets, close companies, or transfer ownership. Set up a system, as well, to remind yourself of tasks like filing tax returns, completing minutes of annual meetings, and paying the annual safe deposit box rent. Make your record-keeping easier by eliminating unnecessary complications.

For example, you probably don’t need a separate address for each trust, corporation, or LLC. Instead of creating a separate company for each asset, you might consider grouping smaller assets within one entity. I’d suggest first discussing the pros and cons with an attorney or financial planner. For larger assets like real estate, I do recommend holding each one separately.

When I talk to clients about asset protection, I mention that part of the price we pay for it is an increase in paperwork. It’s easy to accept that idea with casual good intentions. The case of my reclaimed coin investment is a good reminder of the importance of keeping up with that paperwork. If we don’t, we might protect ourselves right out of access to our own assets.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Subscribe, Refer and Like

***

***

DAILY UPDATE: Capital One Settles Litigation as S&P 500 Rises

MEDICAL EXECUTIVE-POST TODAY’S NEWSLETTER BRIEFING

***

Essays, Opinions and Curated News in Health Economics, Investing, Business, Management and Financial Planning for Physician Entrepreneurs and their Savvy Advisors and Consultants

Serving Almost One Million Doctors, Financial Advisors and Medical Management Consultants Daily

A Partner of the Institute of Medical Business Advisors , Inc.

http://www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com

SPONSORED BY: Marcinko & Associates, Inc.

***

http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Daily Update Provided By Staff Reporters Since 2007.
How May We Serve You?
© Copyright Institute of Medical Business Advisors, Inc. All rights reserved. 2025

REFER A COLLEAGUE: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com

SPONSORSHIPS AVAILABLE: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/sponsors/

ADVERTISE ON THE ME-P: https://tinyurl.com/ytb5955z

Your Referral Count -0-

CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource

Capital One has agreed to pay $425 million to settle nationwide litigation accusing it of cheating savings account depositors out of much higher interest rates by not telling them they could move their money to higher-yielding accounts. A notice describing the preliminary settlement was filed on Friday evening in U.S. federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. The accord requires a judge’s approval.

CITE: https://tinyurl.com/2h47urt5

The S&P 500 is just 3% below its record high set in mid-February, when President Donald Trump launched a trade war that began with Canada and Mexico. That puts the index around bull market territory and marks a stunning rebound from just a month ago as markets crashed after Trump unveiled his “Liberation Day” tariffs.

CITE: https://tinyurl.com/tj8smmes

Stat: $159.4 million. That’s the total paid out to six CEOs at the country’s top payers in 2024. (Fierce Healthcare)

Quote:They couldn’t make the economics work quickly. Changing the way Americans receive healthcare services just looks like a very long slog.”—Julie Utterback, senior equity analyst at investment research firm Morningstar, on big retail chain investments in clinical care (Modern Healthcare)

Read: Could California’s experiment with near-universal healthcare be nearing its end? (KFF Health News)

Visualize: How private equity tangled banks in a web of debt, from the Financial Times.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com

Thank You

***

***

***

***

EDUCATIONAL TEXTBOOKS: https://tinyurl.com/4zdxuuwf

***

MEDICAL PRACTICE SALES: Contracting for Succession Planning

[Reviewing Terms, Conditions and Selling Agreements]

By Dr. Charles F. Fenton III JD

***

***

Dealing with many issues concerning the actual contract that affect the purchase or sale of a medical practice can be daunting. For example, this chapter will not deal with issue of determining whether or not a physician should retire. Nor will it determine the proper Fair Market Value [FMV] of the practice. However, physicians may be assisted in both instances by a medically focused financial advisor, or valuation specialist. [AVA, CPA-CVA, Certified Medical Planner™; etc] working in conjunction with an experience  health care contract attorney to act as an advocate and determine certain contingencies that might occur, and protect him/her from them.

THE PARTIES

The first determination is whether the party at interest is an individual, group of individuals, or an entity (such as a partnership, limited liability partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, or corporation – whether an S corporation, C corporation or a professional corporation). In many instances, even if the party at interest is an individual is an entity, the individual or individuals behind the entity should be made parties to the agreement.

From the buyer’s perspective, the purchase of a medical practice is a highly person-oriented business. The practice value depends much upon the personality of the current treating physicians. If the current treating physicians are also the owners of the entity, then binding those individuals (especially as applies to the restrictive covenant) is of primary importance.

If the current treating physicians are not owners of the entity, but rather employees, then a determination of whether they will continue in their same positions or whether the buyer will be taking over the treatment of patients becomes the prime focus. If the current treating physicians will be continuing in their same positions, then their current employment contract must be reviewed to determine whether the rights of the seller will accrue to the buyer.

If the rights of the seller will not accrue to the buyer, then the Purchase and Sale Agreement must have a provision that makes the continued employment of those current-treating physicians a condition to consummation of the sale. In such instances, the new employment agreement might be an exhibit to the main agreement and executed contemporaneously with the main agreement.

If the current treating physicians will not be continuing in their same position and if the purchaser will be assuming treatment of the patients, then the main agreement must provide for the dissolution of the employment agreement and provision must be made for restricting the ability of those physicians from competing with the buyer. If the employment contract with the seller contains a restrictive covenant, then the buyer must ensure that such covenants will accrue to the buyers benefit. Otherwise, the buyer should insist that those physicians sign restrictive covenants. In such an instance, a portion of the purchase price may need to be allocated towards the consideration for those restrictive covenants and paid directly to those physicians.

DATE OF AGREEMENT AND CLOSING DATE

In general, it usually does not matter when the agreement is dated. It should usually be dated once all the terms are agreed to and the parties desire to bind each other and to be bound. In certain instance, the parties may have reached an agreement, but certain issues (such as the obtaining of a state license to practice medicine) may be outstanding. In such a case, then an option can be given by either the seller or the buyer to bind the other to sell or buy the practice upon exercise of the option. Giving an option can also push the agreement date into the future. The option will usually be given with token consideration (e.g., one hundred dollars) and will have a fixed expiration date (e.g., thirty to ninety days).

The determination of the closing date is more important than the date that the agreement is dated. Just like in the purchase of a house where certain issues (such as obtaining a mortgage and home inspection) must occur before closing, in the purchase of a practice, there may be certain issues which require time to undertake before the actual transfer can be consummated. For example, the buyer may still need to obtain financing or the landlord may need to approve the assignment of the lease.

RECITALS

The recitals – or “whereas” clauses – traditionally enunciate the reasons the parties are entering into the agreement. In the sale of the practice the recitals may simply state that the buyer wishes to buy the practice and the seller wishes to sell the practice. Yet, there is a modern growing tendency among contract attorneys to eliminate the “whereas” clauses as some attorneys feel that such language is antiquated. In such instances, the agreement will simply have a paragraph or two delineation of the “Purpose” of the agreement.

ARTICLES, SECTIONS, AND PARAGRAPHS

The agreement will often be divided and numbered in some logical fashion, either into articles, sections, paragraphs, or a combination of these. The reason for doing so is twofold. First, it allows ready reference to the numbered paragraph, and secondly it allows the agreement to be divided and grouped in logical associations.

BINDING THE PARTIES

The first paragraph of the first article will often bind the seller to sell and the buyer to buy the practice under the terms of the agreement. The rest of the agreement simply spells out those terms.

WHAT IS PURCHASED?

The agreement must disclose the items which are being transferred and the items which are not considered part of the agreement. This section should be crystal clear, so that anybody reading the contract (and hence a court which may be called upon to enforce the contract) and not privy to the preliminary negotiations will know what is part of the agreement and what is not part of the agreement.

[1] Sale of Stock vs. Sale of Assets

In most cases, well-informed financial advisors [FAs] will recommend that the buyer solely purchase the assets of the practice and not the stock of the practice. By purchasing selected assets, the buyer is ensured that he will not become responsible for the known or unknown liabilities of the corporation. In prior days, avoiding purchasing the stock of the corporation was a wise recommendation.

However, with the advent of managed care, the purchase of the stock of the corporation can provide the new practitioner with certain competitive advantages. It may take a new practitioner three to nine months to get onto enough managed care panels to make the practice profitable. Purchase of the stock of the corporation ensures the new practitioner of acquiring the Federal Tax Identification Number [TIN], Personal Identification Number [PIN], Drug Enforcement Agency [DEA], Centers for Medicare and Medicaid [CMS], Global Location Number [GLN] , National Provider Identifier [NPI], HIE-Form 834 transmission number, Durable Medical Equipment Number [DME]  etc, of the corporate entity. Since most managed care corporations identify providers by the Federal TIN, purchase of the stock of the corporation should allow the new practitioner to be enrolled on managed care panels in a shorter period of time.

[2] Items Purchased

Items purchased often lists the tangible and intangible property of the seller which will be transferred to the buyer. Such items often include:

  1. A detailed inventory of the tangible assets to be purchased;
  2. A detailed listing of the inventory of the practice;
  3. The names and addresses of all of the patients of record treated by the seller;
  4. The patient medical records maintained by seller;
  5. The computer records maintained by seller;
  6. All licenses, permits, accreditation and franchises issued by any federal, state, municipal, or quasi-government authority relating to the use, maintenance or operation of the practice, running to or in favor of seller, but only to the extent that they are accepted by buyer;
  7. All of sellers’ right, title, and interest in and to all real estate and equipment leases, if any, services agreements, employment and professional service contracts relating to the practice but only to the extent that the foregoing are accepted by buyer;
  8. Assignment of lease should be attached and be incorporated to the agreement;
  9. All existing telephone numbers used in connection with the operation of the practice and all yellow page advertising of the practice; and
  10. The goodwill of the practice, which includes seller’s assistance and cooperation in transfer of all sellers’ rights and interests in the practice to buyer and any other intangible assets of the practice not listed in any other category.

Certain items purchased, such as [paper or electronic] medical records, governmental licenses, fax, email, website and telephone numbers have special considerations as discussed below.

[3] Medical Records

The seller should protect its future need to use the transferred patient medical records. In the current managed care environment, providers are subject to strict scrutiny. Even after leaving practice the provider may find himself subject to a government or third party audit or subject to a medical malpractice lawsuit. Therefore, the provider should ensure that the contract allows for him to take future possession of the specific medical record(s) of the practice in order to mount an appropriate defense.

[4] Governmental Licenses

Certain government licenses and permits may be nontransferable. These would include items such as the federal and state employer identification numbers, as these are unique to seller as a corporate entity. Likewise, other items unique to seller include Medicare identification numbers, Medicaid identification numbers, NPIs and UPINs. The buyer would have to purchase the stock of the corporation order to acquire such items, which is another advantage of a stock transaction versus an asset transaction. Likewise, some local business licenses may or may not be transferable.

[5] Telephone and Fax Numbers, Website URLs and Twitter [X] Accounts, etc

Transference of the telephone numbers often requires that a special local telephone company form authorizing transfer of the telephone numbers to the buyer. Often the new owner of the telephone number will also become liable for any current yellow page advertisement monthly fees. It is the same with an URL or website or e-mail address or office Twitter X account, etc.

[6] Items Not Purchased

Items not purchased or “excluded items” often list the personal items of the parties or of the employees of the parties. Such items would often include:

  1. All cash on hand or on deposit;
  2. All accounts receivable generated prior to the closing date;
  3. All prepaid expenses, utility deposits, tax rebates, insurance claims, credits due from suppliers and other allowances after Closing Date;
  4. The personal effects, including but not limited to photographs, diplomas, uniforms, books, mementos, memorabilia, personally owned art and any personal property owned by them;
  5. Life insurance, disability insurance, and disability buy-out insurance on seller;
  6. Motor vehicles used in connection with the practice;
  7. Any or all tangible-intangible assets used in conjunction with another practice of seller; and
  8. All other assets owned by seller other than those specifically described as items purchased.

The exact items transferred will often depend upon the prior negotiations of the parties. For example, the parties may have agreed that the accounts receivable will be transferred with the practice. In such an instance, the accounts receivable will be listed as an item to be purchased.

PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS

The price of the transaction (or the value of the practice) is often the one item that is aggressively negotiated between the parties. That is because both the buyer and the seller are overly concerned with “how much?” As this chapter demonstrates, there are a lot more details that go into the negotiation and final contract than just the price. The buyer or seller would be doing themselves a disservice to consider the other factors simply “lawyer details.” Many additional terms of the agreement should be considered by one side or the other as “walk-way” conditions. The party that fully adheres to their additional terms is likely to find the other party capitulating to them. This is because the other party will most likely be fixated on the price.

The purchase price should be delineated in the agreement. Furthermore, the method of payment of the purchase price should be delineated. Although the usual method of payment would be cash, there are other methods available as well.

Cash payment can be made by an official bank cashier’s check, by a certified check, by deposit of funds into an escrow account, or by other method agreed upon by the parties.

Non-cash type transactions include loan agreements and exchanges. Exchanges can provide certain tax benefits if the exchange is a “like kind” exchange. A like kind exchange would occur when parties swap practices. For example, a group practice might have several offices. As part of the breakup of the group, the parties might exchange their stock of one office for all of the stock of another office. Like kind exchanges have strict guidelines that must be adhered to or the tax advantages will disappear. The reader is cautioned to get current legal and financial advice prior to the time of exchange.

It is in the seller’s best interest to get all cash at the time of closing. Then the seller can walk away and not worry about the success or failure of his predecessor. The seller will not have to worry about collecting periodic payments. The seller will not have to worry about placing the buyer in default or about eventually having to repossess the practice and begin to practice medicine at that office again. If a seller repossesses a practice, the buyer may have driven the patients away or lost the managed care contracts (why else would the buyer not be able to honor the loan agreement?). So the repossessed practice will have a significantly lower market value – if it is even marketable at that time.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, it is in the buyer’s best interest to get long and lean loan terms. First, by getting loan terms, the buyer will often have to come up with much less initial capital. Second, because of the discussion in the preceding paragraph, the seller has a vested interest in ensuring that the buyer succeeds once the practice changes hands.

If the transaction involves a seller-financed loan, then the agreement should specify the terms. Additionally, a separate loan agreement and security agreement should be attached as exhibits to the agreement. Finally, in order to perfect the security agreement, the lien should be recorded at the local courthouse in accordance to local rules and customs.

***

***

ALLOCATION OF PURCHASE PRICE

The final purchase price will actually be the amalgamation of various assets of the practice. Those assets include the tangible and intangible assets. The tangible assets include the hard assets (such as computers, treatment tables, chairs and furniture, DME and x-ray machines, etc) and the soft assets (such as Q-tips, paper and cotton balls). The intangible assets will include going concern value, goodwill, and the value of any restrictive covenant.

The parties should delineate the allocation of the purchase price amongst those various categories to reach a mutual best fit with the potential tax obligations. The buyer is the one who should strive to make the allocation fit his needs as best as possible.

Generally, the sale of the assets will be ordinary income to the seller and taxed at the seller’s usual rate. The buyer will be able to depreciate the purchased items. However, the characterization of those assets and the allocated portion of the purchase price will determine how much can be depreciated and over what time period the items can be depreciated.

As a general rule, soft assets can be depreciated fully in the year of purchase. Generally, hard assets can be depreciated over a three to seven year time period, depending upon the class of the asset. Also, under Section §179, a certain dollar amount can be “expensed” or deducted in the year of purchase. The sooner and the faster that the assets can be deducted the less current taxes that the buyer will be required to pay. However, intangible assets generally must be deducted over a 15-year period. This prolongs the tax benefits of any payments characterized as such.

Nonetheless, purchase of the assets results in better tax consequences that purchase of the stock of the practice. When stock is purchased, there is no depreciation allowance allocated in the current or subsequent years. Instead, the cost of the stock becomes the “basis” of the buyer in the practice. Any gain or loss from that basis will only have tax benefits or tax consequences in the year that the stock is sold or becomes worthless.

Because of the tax consequences of the characterization of the allocations of the purchase price, it is important that the agreement delineate the portion of the practice price which is allocated to each category.  Each party should further agree never to claim a different allocation in any future tax filings. Generally, the soft and hard assets will be valued at their current actual cash value. In no event should the purchase price allocated to the soft and hard assets exceed the actual initial cost that the seller paid for the item. The only exception to the foregoing would be if the sale involved the transfer of an appreciable asset.

LEASE ASSIGNMENT

The agreement should provide that upon closing that the seller will assign the lease to the buyer. The buyer then acquires possession of the premises and assumes responsibility for the lease payments.

Sellers often do not understand that even though they do not practice at the leased premises and even though the buyer is making the lease payments, that the seller still remains liable to the landlord under the original lease. Usually this does not present a problem for the seller. But if the buyer abandons the premises or stops making the lease payments, then the landlord will look to the seller for the lease payments through the expiration of the lease.

If the seller has signed a restrictive covenant, then the seller may find himself in the unenviable position of making lease payments for the premises and prohibited from practicing at the premises. The seller should protect himself from this possibility. Therefore, the seller should ensure that the original agreement contains a provision that if the seller becomes liable under the lease that the seller can enter onto the premises, take possession of the practice and the practice assets and can practice medicine at the location until the seller’s liabilities are extinguished.

INDEMNIFICATION AND EXCLUSION/INCLUSION OF LIABILITIES

During the sale of a medical practice, each party will have certain liabilities that the other party should not assume and should not be required to assume. A mutual indemnification clause will act to ensure that each party remains liable for its own liabilities.

In a medical practice, the most common liability is a claim of medical malpractice against the provider. The seller has an interest in insuring that he is not liable for any claim brought by a patient that resulted after he leaves the practice and the buyer has an interest in insuring that she is not liable for any claim brought by a patient that resulted before she acquired the practice.

There are other areas of liability in the sale of a medical practice that may not be readily apparent. These include premise liability (e.g., slip and fall claims), employment claims (e.g., unemployment liability, sexual harassment, discrimination, and wrongful termination claims), tax claims (e.g., unpaid employment taxes and income or sales tax liabilities), and third party payer claims (e.g., Medicare recoupment claims). Consult your insurance agent to determine whether you can obtain insurance coverage to limit your liability under these clauses.

Medical practitioners should understand the full risk of signing an indemnification or hold harmless clause. If a claim is brought against the other party, then the party giving indemnification can be forced to pay any judgment or settlement incurred by that other party. The party giving indemnification can even be required to pay the other party’s attorney bills. This is an important point that the reader should consider carefully: Even if the other party successfully defends a claim, the indemnifying party can be held liable for the other party’s attorney’s fees. Since attorney fees can mount up rapidly, the indemnifying party can find itself responsible for thousands or even tens or thousands of dollars of attorneys’ fees.

If at all possible, one should never sign an indemnification agreement, whether in the sale of a medical practice, a managed care contract, or even a home security monitoring contract. Sometimes, one has no choice but to assume the risk and sign the contract. If at all possible, one should strive to sign such clauses in a corporate capacity and not in an individual capacity. If that is not possible, then seek insurance to minimize the risk. Indemnification clauses and the potential unlimited risk that they pose is one reason why the professional should undertake a carefully planned asset protection program.

***

***

OTHER FACTORS AND CLAUSES 

[A] Integration

As a general rule, once parties have seen fit to put their agreement in writing, then no prior oral agreement regarding the same subject is binding. A paragraph stating that the written agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties simply reflects this rule of contract construction. Such a paragraph also places the parties on notice that any oral representation of the other party that has not been placed in the contract will be worthless.

[B] Construction

At times a court may hold any ambiguities in a contract against the party that prepared the agreement or that had the agreement prepared for them. If the party on the other side of the contract is an individual that was not represented by counsel and especially if that party has had very little business experience (such as a physician or medical provider recently in practice), courts are much more likely to hold ambiguities against the drafter of the agreement.

A paragraph regarding the construction of the agreement and stating that the agreement was formed from negotiation (as opposed to a “take-it-or-leave-it” proposition) can identify for any court constructing the contract that the court should not hold any ambiguities against the drafter. After all, even with negotiated contracts, one party or the other draws up the agreement.

[C] Choice of Law

In the United States today, it is common for parties in different states to have business dealings with each other. Likewise, in the sale of a medical practice, the buyer may begin negotiations in one state and then move to the practice state after consummation of the sale. In a similar vein, following the sale the buyer may move to another state.

In most cases, the various state laws should be similar on the contractual issues involved in the sale of a medical practice. However, a statement in the contract identifying the state whose laws will govern the contract will eliminate one possible source of dispute involving a side issue to the contract. In the vast majority of contracts, the laws of the state where the practice is physically located should be chosen by the parties to govern the contract

[D] Choice of Venue

Just like providing for choice of law, a side issue to the contract can be eliminated by choosing ahead of time the venue to resolve any conflicts that may arise. The venue is simply the place where the conflict will be decided. In most cases, the parties should choose the trial court of the county in which the practice is located.

[E] Survival of Obligations

An agreement to purchase a medical practice contains two aspects. First is the transference of the practice assets in exchange for the purchase price. Second are the various other terms, such as preservation of the medical records. By providing that these obligations survive the closing, each party is assured that the other party will not claim that the actual closing of the agreement extinguished the rights of the parties under the agreement.

 [F] No Waiver Clause

A provision providing that a party does not waive its rights unless such a waiver is committed to writing allows a party to be a “nice guy” without risking its future rights. In some instances, if a party does not insist upon full compliance by the other party, then the first party may be considered to have waived its rights and may have no recourse against the other party.

There may be instances when the forbearance to exercise a right under the contract will benefit both parties. For example, if the buyer cannot pay the seller an installment on time, the seller may agree to extend the time for payment of that installment. The no waiver clause allows the seller to refuse to extend the time for payment of a future installment. Without the clause the buyer might be able to argue that the seller had waived its future rights to timely payments.

[G] Notices

There may be various reasons under the contract why one party may need to give a notice to the other party. Most often such notice will be that a party is claiming that the other is in breach of some provision of the agreement.

By specifying the address and method of delivery of any notice, the sending party can be assured that a court will rule that the receiver had actual or constructive notice.

Such a provision should also provide that one type of notice would be a change of address. Such a change of address notification would then supersede the address delineated in the agreement.

In most cases, the agreement should provide that the counsel to the party would receive a copy of any notice. This accomplishes two goals. First, there is a greater likelihood that the receiving party would receive actual notice. If the receiving party had moved and had failed to provide notice of the change of address, then the party’s counsel would have received the notice. Secondly, the party’s counsel would have received the notice in a timely manner and could take any immediate action that may be necessary.

[H] Severability Clause

A severability clause helps to ensure that if one provision is held by a court to be illegal or unenforceable, then the offending clause will be stricken from the agreement and the parties will be held to the agreement without the clause.

Without a severability clause, if a court finds that one provision of the agreement illegal or unenforceable, then the court has the power to strike down the entire agreement. Although even with a severability clause a court could strike down the entire agreement, the severability clause tells the court that the intent of the parties was that only the offending clause be stricken and essentially asks the court to honor the parties’ intent.

[I] Further Assurances Clause

After execution of the agreement, the parties may discover that certain other documents are necessary to complete the transaction. Unless such documents materially change the meaning and purpose of the agreement, a further assurance clause requires the party of parties to execute and deliver the document.

***

***

CLOSING – SETTLEMENT

The closing or settlement date should be chosen for a mutually time and place. Generally the date will be between 30 and 90 days from the execution of the agreement. This will allow the buyer and the seller adequate time to complete any conditions precedent to closing. At closing, the buyer will tender to the seller the agreed upon funds and will execute any loan and security agreements required under the purchase and sale agreement. If the restrictive covenant also contains a buyer’s covenant, then the buyer will execute that document. The seller will deliver to the buyer a bill of sale for the assets of the practice, will execute the restrictive covenant, will deliver the keys to the practice, and will surrender the assets and the premises to the buyer. Both the buyer and the seller will execute the lease assignment.

Many of the provisions of the agreement will survive the closing. This includes any agreement to prorate expenses not allocated in at the closing, the restrictive covenant agreement, the indemnifications, and any seller’s right maintained in the medical records.

TRANSITION

Both the seller and the buyer have certain interests to protect after the closing which would require the seller to stay with the practice for a period of time following the closing. The seller may have ongoing treatment plans with certain patients (such as post-operative follow-up treatment). The agreement should specify that the seller be allowed to continue at the practice location for the purpose of finishing such treatment plans. Although the buyer may be fully capable of completing such treatment plans, both the buyer and seller should be cognizant that the patient may claim abandonment. Allowing the seller to complete treatment plans in progress will mitigate against any perceived or actual claims of abandonment.

The buyer will want to require the seller to stay with the practice for a certain period of time, usually between three to six months. During that time, the seller will act to introduce the buyer to the current patients and the buyer will begin treatment of any new patients to the practice. In this way, the transition will appear smooth and natural to the current patients.

Of course, during the transition period, the seller will have the right to be paid by the buyer. To avoid misunderstanding, the method of payment should be reduced to writing. Usually the rate of compensation will be the profit margin percentage of the practice allocated to all income collected from the seller’s efforts during the time period in question. An astute negotiator might be able to require the seller to function during the transition period as an implicit condition for the payment of the practice price.

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

As part of the purchase price the buyer is paying for intangible assets of the practice. A medical practice is a highly individual based business. The practice depends in large part upon the reputation of the selling physician. For that reason, the buyer must ensure that the seller cannot use that highly individualized asset to compete against the practice for which she has just paid a high sum. The restrictive covenant protects this interest of the buyer.

A restrictive covenant actually contains several covenants to protect the buyer’s interests. These include not only the obvious covenant not to compete, but also a covenant regarding financial interests, a covenant regarding solicitations, and a covenant regarding proprietary information.

The first covenant is the covenant not to compete. In this covenant, the seller agrees not to compete with the practice in the geographic area during the time term of the agreement. This covenant prohibits the seller from actually practicing or from practicing indirectly. For example, the seller could not set up a clinic within the geographic area during the time period and employ a nurse practitioner to treat patients under his medical license.

The next covenant would be the covenant regarding financial interests. In this covenant, the seller is prohibited from investing in a competing business (i.e., medical practice), within the geographic area during the time period. This provision prevents the seller from investing in such a medical practice, even if he does not directly treat patients at that location.

The third covenant would be the covenant regarding solicitation. In this covenant the seller agrees not only to refrain from contacting patients of the practice during the time period, but also to refrain from contacting employees of the practice. If the seller maintains another office location which will not be sold, then the seller should ensure that the agreement provides that the seller is allowed to treat patients which find themselves to that practice location. Otherwise, the seller may be liable for patient abandonment and may also violate managed care contracts.

A final covenant would be a covenant regarding proprietary information. Simply by the fact of operating the practice, the seller has obtained certain proprietary information about the practice. This includes patient lists, accounting information, managed care contracts, and forms and handbooks. The seller should be prohibited from using such knowledge to the detriment of the practice.

 [A] Time and Distance

The time and distance covered by the restrictive covenants must be reasonable. If either the time or distance is unreasonable, then a court might strike down the entire restrictive covenant.

A reasonable time is usually between two to five years. A two-year time period should be the minimum that the buyer should insist upon. The purpose of the time period is to allow sufficient time for the practice patients to consider the buyer as their “doctor” and to lose confidence in the selling doctor. For that reason, any time period over five years is likely to be considered an unreasonable restraint.

On the other hand, a reasonable distance depends upon many individual factors. A reasonable distance in an urban area like New York City would most likely be completely unreasonable in rural areas, such as rural Iowa. In most metropolitan areas, a five to ten mile radius from the practice location is likely to be considered reasonable. In rural areas, an entire county or even several contiguous counties may be considered reasonable. The main determination of the reasonableness of the distance factor is the total area from which the practice draws its patients.

Most practice management software programs allow for delineation of the practice patient base determined by zip code. That will provide the parties a starting point from which to negotiate the distance factor of the restrictive covenant.

[B] Buyer’s Covenants

The restrictive covenant should also contain buyer’s covenants, although it may seem counterintuitive that the buyer, having paid the seller tens of thousands of dollars for the practice, should be required to sign buyer’s covenants. However, a buyer’s covenant is an important part of the restrictive covenant. Under the purchase agreement, the seller might retain the right to repossess the practice, the practice assets, and the premises. This is most likely to happen when the seller finances the purchase price and the buyer defaults on the payments. It can also happen when the seller assigns the lease to the buyer and the buyer either abandons the premises or otherwise causes a default under the lease. The seller then remains liable as principle under the lease.

For those reasons, the restrictive covenant should provide that if the seller is required to enter onto the premises and take possession of the practice, then the Seller is relieved of his obligations under the restrictive covenants and the buyer now becomes bound by those same obligations. Such buyer’s covenants will prevent the buyer from abandoning the practice and then setting up a nearby competing practice.

CORPORATE RESOLUTION

Most medical practices being sold are corporate entities. If the transaction is a sale for stock, then the transaction is between private parties – the buyer paying cash and the seller transferring the stock.

However, in those cases where the buyer is purchasing the assets of the corporate practice, then the corporation must take certain prerequisite steps. Generally, a corporation, through its officers and directors, is prohibited from selling significant assets without permission of the shareholders.

For that reason, a shareholder meeting must be held and the shareholders at that meeting must approve a resolution allowing the officers and directors to sell significant assets of the corporation.

ASSESSMENT

The contract regarding the sale of a medical practice is the final agreement of the parties. Such a contract should only be executed after sufficient investigation into the practice and upon consultation with proficient professionals, including attorneys, accountants, FAs and practice management consultants. Understanding the basic terms and conditions of a contract regarding the sale of a medical practice is the first step in successfully negotiating the best agreement possible. Before one can negotiate for a certain provision, one must first be aware of the possibility of such a provision and its possible ramifications.

So, what else can FAs and consultants do to help plan properly for the sale of a medical practice, physician succession planning, and this major life liquidity event? Some experience FAs suggest constructing a “dry run template analysis” so the doctor can envision what life will be like after the sale, and what their corresponding financial needs might be. When the practice is sold, life is very different because many expenses that the practice paid become expenses the doctor now must pay.  And so, the use of an astute financial advisor, practice valuation specialist, and healthcare contract attorney is highly advised.

CONCLUSION

As we have seen, the purchase price of a medical practice, although am important part of any sale, should only be considered one element of the negotiations. There are many clauses and provisions of a contract regarding the sale of the medical practice, which if not negotiated favorably should be considered factors to initiate the party to walk away from the sale.

EDUCATION: Books

References and Readings:

  • Boundy, Charles: Business Contracts Handbook Gower Pub, NY 2010
  • Fenton, CF: Contracts Regarding the Sales of a Medical Practice. Financial Planning for Physicians and Healthcare Professionals; Aspen Publishers, New York, NY, 2003.
  • Hekman, K: Buying, Selling & Merging a Medical Practice. Keneth Hekman, New York 2008.
  • Katz, D: Psychic Income, Financial Advisor, page 36, 2014.
  • Walker, Lewis: The Ultimate Transition. Financial Advisor, page 33, 2014.
  • Schatzki, M: Negotiation Speak: Winning Words and Phrases for Sales, Purchasing, Contract and Other Business Negotiations – All the Dialogue and Skills You Need to Come Out Ahead, Dynamic Negotiations, Chicago, IL 2009.
  • UCC, Commercial Contracts and Business Law Blog:  LexisNexis 2010.
  • COMMENTS APPRECIATED
  • Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

THE END

PARADOX: Anti-Trust Definition with Book

By Staff Reporters

***

***

The anti-trust paradox suggests that antitrust enforcement artificially raised prices by protecting inefficient competitors from competition.

The Antitrust Paradox Book is an influential 1978 book by Robert Bork that criticized the state of US anti-trust law in the 1970s. A second edition, updated to reflect substantial changes in the law, was published in 1993. Bork has credited Aaron Director as well as other economists from the University of Chicago as influences.

Bork argued that the original intent of antitrust laws as well as economic efficiency makes consumer welfare and the protection of competition, rather than competitors, were the only goals of antitrust law.

Thus, while it was appropriate to prohibit cartels that fix prices and divide markets and mergers that create monopolies, practices that are allegedly exclusionary, such as vertical agreements and price discrimination, did not harm consumers and so should not be prohibited.

The paradox of antitrust enforcement was that legal intervention artificially raised prices by protecting inefficient enterprises from competition.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Subscribe Today!

***

***

LEGAL: Pro Hac Vice Defined

By Staff Reporters

***

***

Pro hac vice is Law Latin that means “for this time [only]” (literally, “for this turn”). When a lawyer is admitted to a case pro hac vice, a court has granted them a limited license to practice in a jurisdiction where they otherwise would not be licensed to do so.

For example, a lawyer licensed only to practice in California may nonetheless practice in a New York case once a court has granted them admission pro hac vice, so long as the lawyer practices only within the limited scope of their pro hac vice admission. In almost all U.S. jurisdictions, lawyers who practice pro hac vice must do so in conjunction with a local lawyer acting as local counsel. Local counsel typically acts as an anchor to the bar of a foreign jurisdiction, exposing local counsel to liability for the acts or omissions of the lawyer admitted pro hac vice. Local counsel therefore usually assumes, at a minimum, a role of monitoring the lawyer admitted pro hac vice.

READ: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/pro_hac_vice

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Subscribe and Like

***

***