RECESSION: A Heightened Risk in 2026?

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

The U.S. faces a heightened risk of recession in 2026, with economic indicators, expert forecasts, and global instability contributing to widespread concern. While some analysts remain cautiously optimistic, the probability of a downturn is significant.

The potential for a U.S. recession in 2026 is a topic of growing concern among economists, policymakers, and investors. According to UBS, the probability of a recession has surged to 93% based on hard data analysis, including employment trends, industrial production, and credit market signals. This alarming figure reflects a convergence of economic stressors that could culminate in a downturn by the end of 2026.

One of the most prominent warning signs is the inverted yield curve, a historically reliable predictor of recessions. When short-term interest rates exceed long-term rates, it suggests that investors expect weaker growth ahead. This inversion, coupled with elevated federal debt and persistent inflationary pressures, has led many analysts to forecast a slowdown in consumer spending and business investment.

Despite these concerns, some sectors—particularly artificial intelligence (AI)—are providing temporary buoyancy. The AI infrastructure boom has fueled GDP growth and market optimism, with global AI investment projected to reach $500 billion by 2026.

However, experts warn that this surge may be masking underlying economic fragility. If AI-driven investment slows, the economy could quickly lose momentum, revealing vulnerabilities in other sectors such as manufacturing and retail.

Global factors also play a critical role. Trade tensions, geopolitical instability, and fluctuating oil prices have created an unpredictable environment. The lingering effects of tariff pass-throughs and policy uncertainty are expected to intensify in 2026, further straining the U.S. economy. Additionally, speculative forecasts—like those from mystic Baba Vanga—have captured public imagination by predicting a “cash crush” that could disrupt both virtual and physical currency systems, although such claims lack empirical support. Not all forecasts are dire. Oxford Economics suggests that while growth will moderate, the U.S. may avoid a full-blown recession thanks to continued investment incentives and robust AI-related spending. Their above-consensus GDP forecast hinges on the assumption that business confidence remains stable and that fiscal policy supports non-AI sectors effectively.

Nevertheless, the risks are real and multifaceted. The Polymarket prediction platform currently estimates a 43% chance of a U.S. recession by the end of 2026, based on criteria such as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth or an official declaration by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

In conclusion, while the U.S. economy may continue to navigate “choppy waters,” the potential for a recession in 2026 is substantial. Policymakers must remain vigilant, balancing stimulus with fiscal discipline, and addressing structural weaknesses before temporary growth drivers fade.

The coming year will be pivotal in determining whether the U.S. can steer clear of recession or succumb to the mounting pressures.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Hospital Acquisitions of Physician Practices Increase Prices

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

A recent study of hospital physician acquisition and employment found that such acquisitions decrease competition and raise prices. A National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper, released in July 2025, “empirically analyze[d] the effects of mergers between complementary firms on competition and pricing,” and found hospital prices increased by an average of 3.3%, while physician prices increased by an average of 15.1%.

This Health Capital Topics article reviews the study’s findings and implications for the healthcare industry. (Read more…)

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Subscribe, Like and Refer

***

***

The College Degree [Mortality] Advantage

By the NBER

Working Paper 29328), Anne Case and Angus Deaton

***

***

The Persistent Mortality Advantage of a College Degree
In 2019, Americans with a four-year college degree had six years greater life expectancy at age 25 than those without a degree. These educational differences in mortality have been growing in recent decades and are apparent across demographic groups. In Mortality Rates by College Degree before and during COVID-19 (NBER Working Paper 29328), Anne Case and Angus Deaton explore the evolution of these differences during the pandemic.

If every American faced an equal threat of infection and death from COVID-19, then the mortality gap between more and less educated individuals would have narrowed during the pandemic. However, the risks from COVID-19 were plausibly greater for those without a college degree for a variety of reasons. For example, people without college degrees disproportionately work in occupations where working from home to avoid infection is not feasible. They are more likely to use public transportation and to live in crowded housing arrangements, heightening their risk of exposure. Conditional on infection, less educated individuals may experience worse outcomes due to higher average rates of pre-existing conditions and poorer access to health care.

Using provisional mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics, the researchers determine that a college degree was protective against mortality during the calendar year 2020, which encompassed the first nine months of the pandemic. They express the mortality advantage of a college degree using the ratio of the mortality rate for those without a four-year college degree to the rate for those with a degree. The researchers calculate these ratios for 60 different demographic groups, identified by two genders, five age groups, and six racial/ethnic categories (Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and those who report two or more races).

***

The Bulletin on Health summarizes selected recent NBER Working Papers. It is distributed digitally to economists and other interested persons for informational and discussion purposes. The Bulletin is not copyrighted and may be reproduced freely with attribution of source.

To sign up to receive new Bulletin on Health issues by email, please visit: www.nber.org/prefs/bh.pl

Prior to creation of the Bulletin on Health, the NBER published the Bulletin on Aging and Health.

Working Papers produced as part of the NBER’s research program are distributed to encourage discussion and suggestions of preliminary work. Neither Working Papers nor issues of the Bulletin on Health are reviewed by the Board of Directors of the NBER.

The Bulletin on Health is edited by Robin McKnight
  Across all demographic groups, the ratios were all above one in 2020, reflecting higher mortality rates for those without college degrees. The ratios were highest for younger age groups: in the 25 to 39 age group, mortality rates for those without college degrees were as much as seven times the rates for those with college degrees. The researchers argue that the association between education and mortality is concentrated among preventable deaths, which are more prevalent causes of death among younger adults. In addition, older Americans are more likely to be retired, so additional risks that less educated workers faced due to occupational differences were less relevant for older age groups.

The overall finding that those without college degrees were at greater risk of death during the pandemic may not seem surprising, given their differential risks of infection, higher rates of pre-existing conditions, and worse access to care. A more unexpected finding is that these differences in mortality risk, as reflected in the mortality ratio, were very similar to the differences in mortality risk in the year prior to the pandemic. The figure, which plots the ratios for each demographic group in 2019 and in 2020, shows that the mortality advantage of a college degree was little changed during the pandemic relative to the prior year.

The figure highlights a few exceptions to this pattern. For Hispanic women aged 25 to 64 and for non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native women aged 25 to 39, the mortality advantage of a college degree was substantially higher in 2020 than in 2019. But for most demographic groups, the mortality ratios during the pandemic were strikingly similar to those before the pandemic. In fact, for over half of the demographic groups, the ratio was slightly lower in 2020 than in 2019.

The results suggest that the mortality advantage of a college degree during the pandemic was a continuation of pre-existing health differentials between those with and without college degrees. “The mystery,” the researchers conclude, “is not why the [college degree] was protective during the pandemic, but why the effect was proportionately as large before the pandemic.”

***

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Thank You

Subscribe to the Medical Executive-Post

***

****

Organizational Economics and Physician Practices

N.B.E.R.

By James B. Rebitzer & Mark E. Votruba

Economists seeking to improve the efficiency of health care delivery frequently emphasize two issues: the fragmented structure of physician practices and poorly designed physician incentives. This decade old paper analyzes these issues from the perspective of organizational economics.

We begin with a brief overview of the structure of physician practices and observe that the long anticipated triumph of integrated care delivery has largely gone unrealized. We then analyze the special problems that fragmentation poses for the design of physician incentives. Organizational economics suggests some promising incentive strategies for this setting, but implementing these strategies is complicated by norms of autonomy in the medical profession and by other factors that inhibit effective integration between hospitals and physicians. Compounding these problems are patterns of medical specialization that complicate coordination among physicians.

We conclude by considering the policy implications of our analysis – paying particular attention to proposed Accountable Care Organizations.

***

READ HERE: https://www.nber.org/papers/w17535

ASSESSMENT: What has changed this past decade; if anything? Your thoughts are appreciated.

***

***

CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA

INVITATIONS: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/dr-david-marcinkos-bookings/

MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Ph: 770-448-0769

Second Opinions: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/schedule-a-consultation/

THANK YOU

***

WEALTH ACCUMULATION: Temptation and Incentives

A WORKING WHITE PAPER

Orazio Attanasio

Agnes Kovacs

Patrick Moran

We propose a rich model of household behavior to study the effect of two important policies: mortgage interest tax deduction and mandatory mortgage amortization. These policies have attracted some controversy, first because they are conceived to increase overall saving, an objective that the literature does not agree they can achieve, and second because they incentivize illiquid savings and may thus increase the share of ‘wealthy hand-to-mouth’ households.

We build a life-cycle model where housing may act as a commitment device to counteract present biases arising from temptation. We show that the model matches several empirical facts, including the large share of wealthy hand-to-mouth households. We evaluate the effect of the two policies and find that they increase wealth accumulation by 7 and 10% respectively.

Our results demonstrate that these policies not only induce portfolio re-balancing, as emphasized by the previous literature, but also increase savings by making commitment more accessible.

WHITE PAPER: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w28938/w28938.pdf

ASSESSMENT: Your thoughts and comments are appreciated.

THANK YOU

***

***

On Higher Prescription Drug Cost-Sharing and Mortality?

Raises Mortality among Medicare PART D Beneficiaries

QUERY: What are the health consequences when patients reduce their use of prescribed medications in response to higher out-of-pocket costs?

w28439.jpg

In The Health Costs of Cost-Sharing (NBER Working Paper 28439), researchers Amitabh Chandra, Evan Flack and Ziad Obermeyer use the distinctive out-of-pocket cost-sharing features of Medicare Part D to demonstrate that such reductions can increase mortality.

ASSESSMENT: Your thoughts are appreciated.

THANK YOU

***

The Economic Value and Pricing of “Personalized and Precision” Medicine

PRECISION MEDICINE

By Tomas J. Philipson

DEFINITION: Personalized medicine, also referred to as precision medicine, is a medical model that separates people into different groups—with medical decisions, practices, interventions and/or products being tailored to the individual patient based on their predicted response or risk of disease

CITE: https://www.amazon.com/Dictionary-Health-Insurance-Managed-Care/dp/0826149944/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1275315485&sr=1-4

We discuss the economic value of personalized medicine and the optimal pricing of the combination products involved. We build on previous work of Egan and Philipson (2015) who stress a link between rational adherence in health care and the value of personalized medicine. Personalized medicine converts experience goods to search goods by speeding up the learning process relative to trial and error. This explains the emergence of personalized medicine in cancer care as well as the timing of this emergence. It also predicts greater innovation-and merger incentives from Disneyland style two-part pricing of the combination products.

Personalized Medicine - Personal Medicine - Medicine ...

READ: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c13997/c13997.pdf

Your thoughts are appreciated.

THANK YOU

***

Selected NBER Papers of Note for MDs and FAs

Join Our Mailing List

National Bureau of Economic Research

www.NBER.org

The 2012 No. 3 Bulletin includes the articles below:

1)  The Value of Planning Prompts
by Katherine Milkman, John Beshears, James Choi, David Laibson, and Brigitte Madrian
http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no3/w17994.html

2)  The Effect of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Infant Health
by Hilary Hoynes, Douglas Miller, and David Simon
http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no3/w18206.html

3)  Can Health Explain Differences in Employment of Older Men Across Countries?
by Kevin Milligan and David Wise
http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no3/w18229.html

Assessment

Abstracts of Selected Recent NBER Working Papers:
http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no3/WorkingPaperSummaries.html

###

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Product Details  Product Details

Product DetailsProduct Details

The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health

Join Our Mailing List

The National Bureau of Economic Research — 2012 No. 2

The 2012 No. 2 Bulletin includes the articles below:

1)  Can Low-Cost Interventions Affect Retirement Saving Behavior?

by Gopi Shah Goda, Colleen Flaherty Manchester, and Aaron Sojourner –  #17927
by James Choi, Emily Haisley, Jennifer Kurkoski, and Cade Massey – #17843

http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no2/w17927.html

2)  Labor Market Effects of the Massachusetts Health Insurance Reform

by Jonathan Kolstad and Amanda Kowalski

http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no2/w17933.html

3)  Can Germany’s Riester Pensions Fill the Pension Gap?

by Axel Boersch-Supan, Michela Coppola, and Anette Reil-Held

http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no2/w18014.html

4)  Retirement Before the Social Security Entitlement Age

by Kevin Milligan

http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no2/w18051.html

5)  Are Consumers Forward-Looking in Responding to Health Care Prices?

by Aviva Aron-Dine, Liran Einav, Amy Finklestein, and Mark Cullen

http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no2/w17802.html

NBER Profile:  Patricia Danzon

http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no2/danzon.html

NBER Profile:  Doug Staiger

http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/2012no2/staiger.html

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Hospitals: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Product Details Product Details

Product Details

Spillovers, Complementarities and Specialization in the Hospital Industry

Broadening Focus

Join Our Mailing List

NBER Working Paper No. 16937
Issued in April 2011

The long-standing argument that focused operations out-perform others stands in stark contrast to claims about the benefits of broader operational scope and is addressed by Jonathan R. Clark, Robert Huckman in this working paper

Specialize Expertise

The performance benefits of focus are typically attributed to reduced complexity, lower uncertainty, and the development of specialized expertise, while the benefits of greater breadth are linked to the economies of scope achieved by sharing common resources, such as advertising or production capacity, across activities. Within the literature on corporate strategy, this tension between focus and breadth is reconciled by the concept of related diversification (i.e., a firm with multiple operating units, each specializing in distinct but related activities). They consider whether there are similar benefits to related diversification within an operating unit and examine the mechanism that generates these benefits.

Cardio-Vascular Care Context

Using the empirical context of cardiovascular care within hospitals, the authors first examine the relationship between a hospital’s level of specialization in cardiovascular care and the quality of its clinical performance on cardiovascular patients. They find that, on average, focus has a positive effect on quality performance. They then distinguish between positive spillovers and complementarities to examine: (1) the extent to which a hospital’s specialization in areas related to cardiovascular care directly impacts performance on cardiovascular patients (positive spillovers) and (2) whether the marginal benefit of a hospital’s focus in cardiovascular care depends on the degree to which the hospital “co-specializes” in related areas (complementarities).

Assessment

In this setting, they find evidence of such complementarities in hospital specialization.

Link: https://hq.ssrn.com/login/pubSignInJoin.cfm?nber_id=w16937

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product Details