Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds.
THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
Accountants do it – Attorneys do it – Why Not Docs?
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CPHQ, CMP™
Like the Nike slogan, hospitals should just do-it! Make checklists, that is! A new report by the Associated Press, on January 15, 2009, suggests simple checklists might improve medical quality and save hospitals $15 billion a year.
NEJM Study
The study was led by Atul Gawande MD, now a Harvard surgeon and medical journalist, and just published in the New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM]. The 19-item checklist, used in the study, was far more detailed than what is required for most institutions. In summary, doctors who followed a checklist of steps cut death rates from surgery, almost in half, and complications by more than a third in a large study on how to avoid blatant operating room mistakes.
The Checklist
The 19 point surgical checklist was developed by the World Health Organization [WHO] and includes common sense, and inexpensive, measures like these two:
- Prior to the patient being given anesthesia, make sure relevant anatomy is marked, and everyone knows if the patient has an allergy.
- After surgery, check that all the needles, sponges and instruments are accounted for.
- Before the checklist was introduced, 1.5 percent of patients in a comparison group died within 30 days of surgery at eight hospitals. Afterward, the rate dropped to 0.8 percent — a 47 percent decrease. Duh; as Homer Simpson might say! Not exactly rocket science; is it?
Skeptics Exist
However, Dr. Peter Pronovost – a Johns Hopkins University researcher in my hometown of Baltimore – led a highly influential checklist study a few years back on cutting infection rates from various intravenous tubes. He was a skeptic of this study because the researchers collected their own data and acknowledged the possibility that results were partly skewed because folks perform better when observed.
A Next-Gen Quality Proponent
I have been a fan of Atul since his medical school and surgical training days as a resident at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. I even cited him as a precocious young up-start in the preface of my book, Insurance and Risk Management Strategies for Physicians and Advisors. His own works, of course, are best-sellers: Complications: A Surgeon’s Notes on an Imperfect Science, and Better: A Surgeon’s Notes on Performance. In fact, I often posit that he is a leading example of next-gen quality gurus, following in the foot-steps of Robert Wachter MD before him, and John E. Wennberg MD, MPH of the Dartmouth Atlas, before Bob.
My Experiences
Yet, far too many medical quality issues are being blindly addressed with powerful information technology systems. But, do we really need RFID tags to ensure proper side surgery, or bar codes bracelets for newborns? For example, while a medical student from Temple University back in the late seventies, I was observing surgery during an orthopedic rotation and noted the wrong extremity had been prepped and draped, awaiting the surgeons’ incision. Luckily, my big mouth was an advantage at the time. Decades later, at birth, I helped deliver my own daughter and immediately splashed a (far-too-large) swatch of gentian-violet on her left heel as an identifier; cheap … effective … simple. It did horrify the youngish nursing staff, but not so the more mature PICU staff. These, and related issues, might be alleviated with some managerial common sense; along with a dose of mindset change.
Assessment
With the Obama administration about to spend massive amounts of money on eHRs and other sophisticated – but largely unproven and non inter-operable HIT systems – medical quality improvement measures; perhaps it’s time to take a breath, think and KISS!
Most medical practices, clinics and hospitals ought not [should not] operate at full capacity, and maybe the best patient care is driven by demand (needs) – and not the supply driven (wants) of administrators, doctors, stockholders and private [physician owned] hospitals and/or other stakeholders. Still, financial advisors do-it, automobile mechanics do-it; so why don’t docs and hospitals do it… the checklist-thing?
Conclusion
Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:
- Dictionary of Health Economics and Finance
- Dictionary of Health Information Technology and Security
- Dictionary of Health Insurance and Managed Care
Share this:
Filed under: Book Reviews, Career Development, Ethics, Information Technology, Op-Editorials, Quality Initiatives, Research & Development, Risk Management | Tagged: Atul Gawande, david marcinko, John Wennberg, medical quality, NEJM, Peter Pronovost, Robert Wachter | 4 Comments »
The Leading Business Education Network for Doctors, Financial Advisors and Health Industry Consultants 