By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
***
The question of whether new communists truly want socialism is more complicated than it first appears. On the surface, many who identify with contemporary communist or socialist movements claim a desire for a radically transformed society—one without exploitation, extreme inequality, or the dominance of private capital. Yet beneath that shared language lies a wide spectrum of motivations, interpretations, and expectations. Some envision a complete restructuring of economic life, while others use the term “socialism” as shorthand for fairness, security, or moral opposition to corporate power. Understanding whether new communists genuinely want socialism requires examining what they mean by the term, what they hope to change, and how their goals differ from earlier generations.
At the core of the issue is the evolving meaning of socialism itself. Classical socialism referred to collective ownership of the means of production, the abolition of private capital, and the replacement of market competition with planned economic coordination. Many new communists still endorse these principles, but others use “socialism” to describe a more humane version of capitalism—one with stronger welfare systems, universal healthcare, or worker protections. This shift in meaning complicates the question. If someone calls themselves a communist but primarily advocates for reforms within the existing system, do they truly want socialism in the classical sense, or do they simply want a more equitable society?
Another factor is the political identity dimension. For some, communism functions less as a detailed economic program and more as a symbolic rejection of the status quo. In an era marked by rising inequality, precarious work, and corporate concentration, identifying as a communist can be a way of expressing frustration with systems that feel unresponsive or unjust. This symbolic stance does not always translate into a concrete desire for socialist institutions. Instead, it may reflect a longing for dignity, stability, or community—values that could be pursued through various political arrangements, not exclusively socialist ones.
However, it would be a mistake to assume that all new communists are merely using the label for aesthetic or emotional reasons. Many are deeply committed to the traditional socialist vision. They argue that capitalism’s structural incentives—profit maximization, competition, and private ownership—inevitably produce inequality and instability. For these individuals, socialism is not a vague aspiration but a necessary alternative. They advocate for worker‑owned enterprises, democratic planning, and the elimination of private control over essential industries. Their commitment is ideological, strategic, and often grounded in historical analysis.
Still, even among committed socialists, there is debate about how socialism should be achieved. Some favor gradual transformation through democratic institutions, believing that public support and political legitimacy are essential. Others argue that capitalism’s entrenched power structures make peaceful transition impossible. These disagreements reveal that wanting socialism is not a single, unified desire but a constellation of visions and strategies. The diversity within new communist movements suggests that the question cannot be answered with a simple yes or no.
***
***
A further complication is the influence of digital culture. Online spaces have given rise to a form of left‑wing politics that blends humor, irony, and ideological experimentation. Memes, slogans, and symbolic gestures often substitute for detailed political programs. This environment can blur the line between genuine commitment and performative identity. Some participants may adopt communist language as a form of cultural expression rather than a serious political project. Others may begin with irony but develop sincere beliefs over time. The fluidity of online political identity makes it difficult to determine who truly wants socialism and who is participating in a broader cultural trend.
Despite these complexities, one common thread unites many new communists: a desire for economic justice. Whether they envision full socialism or a reformed capitalism, they share a conviction that current systems fail to meet basic human needs. They point to rising costs of living, stagnant wages, and the concentration of wealth as evidence that something fundamental must change. This shared dissatisfaction does not guarantee agreement on solutions, but it does explain why socialism—however defined—has regained appeal.
Ultimately, the question “Do new communists really want socialism?” may be less important than understanding what motivates the resurgence of socialist language in the first place. Many are searching for alternatives to a world that feels increasingly unequal and unstable. Some believe socialism offers a coherent path forward; others use the term as a rallying cry for fairness and dignity. The diversity of motivations suggests that new communists do not form a monolithic group. Some genuinely want socialism in its traditional sense, while others seek a more humane society without fully embracing socialist structures.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: communism, history, Marcinko, marxism, philosophy, politics, socialism |














Leave a comment