• Member Statistics

    • 790,124 Colleagues-to-Date [Sponsored by a generous R&D grant from iMBA, Inc.]
  • David E. Marcinko [Editor-in-Chief]

    As a former Dean and appointed Distinguished University Professor and Endowed Department Chair, Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA was a NYSE broker and investment banker for a decade who was respected for his unique perspectives, balanced contrarian thinking and measured judgment to influence key decision makers in strategic education, health economics, finance, investing and public policy management.

    Dr. Marcinko is originally from Loyola University MD, Temple University in Philadelphia and the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center in PA; as well as Oglethorpe University and Emory University in Georgia, the Atlanta Hospital & Medical Center; Kellogg-Keller Graduate School of Business and Management in Chicago, and the Aachen City University Hospital, Koln-Germany. He became one of the most innovative global thought leaders in medical business entrepreneurship today by leveraging and adding value with strategies to grow revenues and EBITDA while reducing non-essential expenditures and improving dated operational in-efficiencies.

    Professor David Marcinko was a board certified surgical fellow, hospital medical staff President, public and population health advocate, and Chief Executive & Education Officer with more than 425 published papers; 5,150 op-ed pieces and over 135+ domestic / international presentations to his credit; including the top ten [10] biggest drug, DME and pharmaceutical companies and financial services firms in the nation. He is also a best-selling Amazon author with 30 published academic text books in four languages [National Institute of Health, Library of Congress and Library of Medicine].

    Dr. David E. Marcinko is past Editor-in-Chief of the prestigious “Journal of Health Care Finance”, and a former Certified Financial Planner® who was named “Health Economist of the Year” in 2010. He is a Federal and State court approved expert witness featured in hundreds of peer reviewed medical, business, economics trade journals and publications [AMA, ADA, APMA, AAOS, Physicians Practice, Investment Advisor, Physician’s Money Digest and MD News] etc.

    Later, Dr. Marcinko was a vital recruited BOD member of several innovative companies like Physicians Nexus, First Global Financial Advisors and the Physician Services Group Inc; as well as mentor and coach for Deloitte-Touche and other start-up firms in Silicon Valley, CA.

    As a state licensed life, P&C and health insurance agent; and dual SEC registered investment advisor and representative, Marcinko was Founding Dean of the fiduciary and niche focused CERTIFIED MEDICAL PLANNER® chartered professional designation education program; as well as Chief Editor of the three print format HEALTH DICTIONARY SERIES® and online Wiki Project.

    Dr. David E. Marcinko’s professional memberships included: ASHE, AHIMA, ACHE, ACME, ACPE, MGMA, FMMA, FPA and HIMSS. He was a MSFT Beta tester, Google Scholar, “H” Index favorite and one of LinkedIn’s “Top Cited Voices”.

    Marcinko is “ex-officio” and R&D Scholar-on-Sabbatical for iMBA, Inc. who was recently appointed to the MedBlob® [military encrypted medical data warehouse and health information exchange] Advisory Board.

    entrepreneur

    Frontal_lobe_animation

  • ME-P Information & Content Channels

  • ME-P Archives Silo [2006 – 2020]

  • Ann Miller RN MHA [Managing Editor]

    ME-P SYNDICATIONS:
    WSJ.com,
    CNN.com,
    Forbes.com,
    WashingtonPost.com,
    BusinessWeek.com,
    USNews.com, Reuters.com,
    TimeWarnerCable.com,
    e-How.com,
    News Alloy.com,
    and Congress.org

    Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners(TM)

    Product Details

    Product Details

    Product Details

  • CERTIFIED MEDICAL PLANNER® program

    New "Self-Directed" Study Option SinceJanuary 1st, 2018
  • Most Recent ME-Ps

  • PodiatryPrep.org


    BOARD CERTIFICATION EXAM STUDY GUIDES
    Lower Extremity Trauma
    [Click on Image to Enlarge]

  • ME-P Free Advertising Consultation

    The “Medical Executive-Post” is about connecting doctors, health care executives and modern consulting advisors. It’s about free-enterprise, business, practice, policy, personal financial planning and wealth building capitalism. We have an attitude that’s independent, outspoken, intelligent and so Next-Gen; often edgy, usually controversial. And, our consultants “got fly”, just like U. Read it! Write it! Post it! “Medical Executive-Post”. Call or email us for your FREE advertising and sales consultation TODAY [770.448.0769]

    Product Details

    Product Details

  • Medical & Surgical e-Consent Forms

    ePodiatryConsentForms.com
  • iMBA R&D Services

    Commission a Subject Matter Expert Report [$250-$999]January 1st, 2019
    Medical Clinic Valuations * Endowment Fund Management * Health Capital Formation * Investment Policy Statement Analysis * Provider Contracting & Negotiations * Marketplace Competition * Revenue Cycle Enhancements; and more! HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
  • iMBA Inc., OFFICES

    Suite #5901 Wilbanks Drive, Norcross, Georgia, 30092 USA [1.770.448.0769]. Our location is real and we are now virtually enabled to assist new long distance clients and out-of-town colleagues.

  • ME-P Publishing

  • SEEKING INDUSTRY INFO PARTNERS?

    If you want the opportunity to work with leading health care industry insiders, innovators and watchers, the “ME-P” may be right for you? We are unbiased and operate at the nexus of theoretical and applied R&D. Collaborate with us and you’ll put your brand in front of a smart & tightly focused demographic; one at the forefront of our emerging healthcare free marketplace of informed and professional “movers and shakers.” Our Ad Rate Card is available upon request [770-448-0769].

  • Reader Comments, Quips, Opinions, News & Updates

  • Start-Up Advice for Businesses, DRs and Entrepreneurs

    ImageProxy “Providing Management, Financial and Business Solutions for Modernity”
  • Up-Trending ME-Ps

  • Capitalism and Free Enterprise Advocacy

    Whether you’re a mature CXO, physician or start-up entrepreneur in need of management, financial, HR or business planning information on free markets and competition, the "Medical Executive-Post” is the online place to meet for Capitalism 2.0 collaboration. Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds. ******************************************************************** THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
  • OIG Fraud Warnings

    Beware of health insurance marketplace scams OIG's Most Wanted Fugitives at oig.hhs.gov

The RAND Corporation’s Health IT Legacy‏

Join Our Mailing List 

Understanding ObamaCare and HIT Data Breaches

[By Darrell K. Pruitt DDS]

1-darrellpruittTwo current topics in the HIT industry: (1) A dishonest 2005 RAND study set up lawmakers for disappointment in electronic health records, which are essential to Obamacare, and (2) I told you so.

The Reports

Just the other day, there were reports of two data breaches of EHRs involving over 734,000 patients in Texas and California.

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2013/10/23/health-facilities-in-california-texas-report-health-data-breaches

For reasons like this, the wisdom of an ambitious mandate for paperless healthcare by 2014 is beginning to be questioned by the same lawmakers who were sucked in years ago by RAND’s tainted 2005 study.

According to the vendor-friendly results gleaned from vendor-friendly data supplied by vendors, EHRs should have started saving 100,000 lives and $77 billion a year, years ago. Predictably, that has not happened. Far from it!

The Findings 

The happy findings – discredited even by RAND in January of this year – were paid for by Cerner and GE, who profited immensely from their RAND investment. Since nationwide adoption of EHRs became a bi-partisan goal with bubbly beginnings and millions of campaign dollars, the costs and danger of healthcare IT didn’t appear to bother conservatives until three months after RAND admitted the study was garbage.

In April, six GOP senators, led by Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), released a detailed report criticizing HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ execution of a $35 billion initiative to promote EHRs as part of the ARRA stimulus package. (See: “GOP senators raise concerns with push for electronic medical records,” by Sam Baker, April 16, 2013, The Hill).

http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/medicare/294273-gop-senators-raise-concerns-with-push-for-electronic-medical-records

Wither ARRA?

Have you ever wondered why ARRA was passed as a jobs bill rather than as part of healthcare reform? Any ideas?

More recently, with the conservatives’ failure to stop Obamacare even by shutting down government, EHRs have become recognized as the ACA’s next best weakness. Yesterday, Greg Scandlen, writing for RightSideNews.com, posted “The Tyranny of Electronic Systems.” It goes downhill from there.

http://www.rightsidenews.com/2013102333379/life-and-science/health-and-education/the-tyranny-of-electronic-systems.html

Even More

Also yesterday, Michelle Mailkin writing for Townhall.com, an ultra-conservative website similar to RightSideNews, posted, “Don’t Forget Obamacare’s Electronic Medical Records Wreck.

http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2013/10/23/dont-forget-obamacares-electronic-medical-records-wreck-n1730172?utm_source=TopBreakingNewsCarousel&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=BreakingNewsCarousel

Assessment 

Conservatives found traction: Without the anticipated healthcare savings from EHRs, Obamacare will not survive. These times are not as happy for EHR stake-holders as RAND led them to expect.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

LEXICONS: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Product Details  Product Details

Product DetailsProduct Details

Product Details

Confusion About “Meaningful Use” Reigns

Join Our Mailing List

Are Doctors Embracing or Ignoring ARRA?

By D. Kellus Pruitt DDS

pruittAre physicians embracing ARRA Meaningful Use cash incentives or ignoring them? That depends on whom one asks.

Doctors versus the Feds

National progress towards Meaningful Use of expensive EHRs depends on whether one talks to federal employees whose jobs depend on the stimulus mandate, or doctors who purchase EHRs to improve care rather than to use them … Meaningfully.

The Feds

Today, Joseph Conn, writing for ModernHealthcare, posted a rosy outlook for MU adoption according to researchers working for HHS’ Office of the National Coordinator (ONC). They base their optimism for job security on a recent National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) survey:

“A growing number of office-based physicians are using more-robust EHRs that have higher-level functions needed to help the doctors qualify for federal EHR incentive payments [for Meaningful Use] and assist them in providing better, safer care for patients, the researchers reported.” (See “Researchers: More doctors using more-sophisticated EHRs”).

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20121212/NEWS/312129956/researchers-more-doctors-using-more-sophisticated-ehrsJust

eMR and HIT Security

The Doctors

However, yesterday, in an InformationWeek article by Ken Terry titled, “Meaningful Use Doesn’t Drive Doctors’ EHR Selection,” doctors suggested a more depressing future for MU sophistication based on the same NCHS survey:

“Jason Mitchell, MD, assistant director of the Center for Health IT at the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), told InformationWeek Healthcare that he found [the lagging adoption of MU-capable EHRs] puzzling. While there’s no doubt that Meaningful Use has driven much of the increase in EHR use, he said, it seems strange that so many physicians would buy and implement EHRs that could not be used to show Meaningful Use.”

http://www.informationweek.com/healthcare/electronic-medical-records/meaningful-use-doesnt-drive-doctors-ehr/240144093

Assessment

Whom should doctors believe – HHS employees who give away billions of stimulus dollars for Meaningful Use, or family physicians who have determined that the subsidy isn’t worth the cost and effort?

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

 

 

Product Details

Doctors’ Use of For-Profit Algorithms Considered UnSportsManLike Conduct

Join Our Mailing List

On Protecting Medical Coding Jobs

By Darrell K. Pruitt DDS

The US government moves quickly to protect tedious upcoding jobs from being taken over by upcoding software.

Medical Billing and Coding for Dummies

In coding expert Karen Smiley’s July 2012 book, “Medical Billing and Coding for Dummies,” she writes: “It really does pay to be a certified medical biller/coder, no matter what designation you choose to pursue. Surveys conducted by the AAPC [American Academy of Professional Coders] indicate that coder salaries have continued to increase despite economic downturns. One possible reason for this is that getting payers to pay claims is becoming increasingly difficult.”

Call me cynical, but to me, her defense of the coding profession confirms that healthcare’s increasing demand for highly-paid coders (who have nothing to do with directly providing care to patients) is artificial, and originates with an administration which complicates providers’ payments in order to create new, high-paying jobs in the HIT industry – quietly adding to the cost of healthcare to cosmetically boost employment figures before an election. Who ultimately pays the bill for all non-productive healthcare costs?

Amazon Morphs

Less than 3 months following the appearance of “Medical Billing and Coding for Dummies” on Amazon for under $25 (paperback), EMR software suddenly changed or morphed the entire game, and the administration reacts by changing the rules to protect political investments.

Similar to algorithmic trading’s proven advantage over low-tech investors on Wall Street, the computation capabilities of modern EMRs allegedly provide an unfair advantage to doctors and hospitals, and at taxpayers’ expense – according to HHS and Justice Department officials.

Enter Eric Holder and Kathleen Sebelius

“On Monday [September 24], Attorney General Eric Holder and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius sent a strongly worded letter warning that the Obama administration will not tolerate hospitals’ attempts to ‘game the system’ by using EHR systems to boost Medicare and Medicaid payments.” – iHealthBeat, September 26, 2012.

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2012/9/26/stakeholders-react-to-warning-on-use-of-ehrs-for-upcoding.aspx#ixzz29fYzjPUH

This was followed by an article posted yesterday, also on iHealthBeat titled, “Mostashari To Launch Review of Using EHRs for ‘Upcoding,’”

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2012/10/17/mostashari-to-launch-review-of-using-ehrs-for-upcoding.aspx#ixzz29fDElIKL

Enter the NCHIT

“National Coordinator for Health IT Farzad Mostashari MD plans to launch an internal review to determine whether electronic health record systems are prompting some health care providers to overbill Medicare by selecting higher-paying treatment codes, a process known as ‘upcoding,’ the Center for Public Integrity reports.”

Apparently, it only recently occurred to lawmakers that the EMRs they promote greatly simplify Medicare’s intentionally tedious and time-consuming reimbursement requirements mentioned by Karen Smiley – making profits much easier for providers without having to hire even more staff just to get paid for work done long ago. In addition, the alleged upcoding software threatens to eliminate the need for recently-graduated coding professionals – whose education was backed by ARRA stimulus (taxpayer) money. While our nation’s leaders might wink at institutional investors’ highly-profitable algorithmic trading on the stock market, unemployed coding specialists with outstanding college loans would only increase the potential embarrassment for the administration should doctors and hospitals be permitted to computerize billing decisions – leading to payment for services previously given away because they weren’t worth the hassle and expense of documentation!

Assessment

Unlike investors playing the stock market, according to Medicare’s emerging rules, doctors’ use of algorithms to increase profits is considered unsportsmanlike conduct. With the election only days away, can you blame them?

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Hospitals: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Product Details

The “Whole Tooth” Blog Talk Radio to Interview Dr. Darrell Pruitt on eHRs

Join Our Mailing List

Plugging my Interview and Otherwise Clogging Things

[By D. Kellus Pruitt DDS]

Where are the EDR cheerleaders when I need them? On Tuesday May 31st, I’ve got a show to put on!

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thewholetooth

Where are the EDR Cheerleaders?

Every now and then I still come across EDR vendors on the internet who would mislead naïve dentists about their product to make a sale. Today, I held FirstEMR representative Robert Evans accountable for self-serving misinformation he posted on EMR and HIPAA forum. (My dad would be proud that I told him “Get that garbage out of here!”). Then, remembering my manners, I invited Mr. Evans to please call into The Whole Tooth Blogtalkradio program on May 31 to further discuss the future of EHRs in dentistry. Unfortunately, because of things like the reflexive “garbage” statement, I don’t think he’ll show.

I try my best to be “collegial,” but I simply cannot pretend unethical sales techniques are acceptable in my neighborhood, and I want to help my friends easily recognize them… so what if I have a little fun.

http://www.emrandhipaa.com/emr-and-hipaa/2010/11/18/emr-stimulus-q-and-a-emr-stimulus-money-and-dentists/comment-page-1/#comment-133132

Of Robert Evans

Thanks for your response, Robert Evans.

As I read your list of 6 rationalizations for electronic dental records here on the EMR and HIPAA forum , it occurred to me that you haven’t had a chance to read my detailed post on this thread from November 22 (Number 14) in which I de-bunked 28 similar myths – substantially including your 6. But since I never tire of doing this, let’s once again go through the details of a popular national blunder in dentistry you and other well-intentioned stakeholders in the HIT industry were sucked into.

“My personal background is medical administration and operations.” That would explain your misconceptions about EHRs in the unique field of dentistry.

For your first mistake, you say “Dentists can qualify as eligible providers for ARRA incentives” You really should have gone on to explain that for a dentist to qualify for the stimulus money, 30% of his or her practice has to be from Medicare/Medicaid. Since you surely should have known that, to fail to mention it could easily be interpreted as deceptive.

This is just a guess, but I’d say less than 10% of the dentists in the nation in private practice would make it on that qualification alone even if it made business sense to accept government money and the expensive demands that come with it. Since you are in the EHR business, you may have more accurate figures on that. What’s more, our grandchildren’s money will be gone long before the stimulus makes it to dentistry. You should already know that as well.

“All of our clients, including Dentists, Endodontists, Periodontists, Implant Surgeons and more are extremely pleased that they made the transition “ All of them, Robert? Really?

The ME-P Forum 

This ME-P forum right here is full of stories about disappointed providers – perhaps other than your clients – who are finding huge problems with the transition. De-installations are far too common. It seems like a while back it was close to 30%. Then again, since you are in the business, you probably have more accurate figures for that as well.

Even the stimulus money isn’t sufficient subsidy for physicians to realize a return on investment in EMRs. And virtually nobody is interoperable as planned. That means the office tools you sell raise the cost of healthcare rather than lower it. What’s more, physicians stand to benefit from interoperability much more than dentists regardless of stimulus money. And if a dentist can’t expect ROI from an office tool, it’s called a hobby.

By the way, have you looked at the Stage 2 Meaningful Use requirements that stand between dentists and disappearing ARRA money? Well-meaning outsiders with plans for the common good just don’t realize that someone has to enter every piece of irrelevant detail about dental patients that CMS requires in order to receive full payment.

It’s a trap, Robert. And it’s not very well hidden. Dentists don’t take candy from strangers.

The Benefits

“The benefits to your office are numerous and too many to mention here; but, please take into account the following”:

1. Never having to worry about compliance issues, as we are 100% compliant with all standards and formats that CMS is mandating.

– You are 100% scary. As long as a provider stores or transmits electronic PHI he or she clearly must be concerned about HIPAA compliance issues. What’s more, as a Business Entity for the dentists you serve, if your computer system is hacked or someone on your end otherwise fumbles or steals 500 or more of a dentists’ patients’ PHI, all of the dentist’s patients must be notified of the danger of identity theft. In addition, federal law stipulates that news of the data breach must be broadcast as a press release in the dentist’s local media. This can easily bankrupt a dentist… You just had to know about this before today.

Your compliancy claim is not only wrong, but it is irresponsible and unethical advertising. You are not 100% compliant. Since the Rule is intentionally vague, nobody is. Get that garbage out of here!

2. Greatly reduce or even eliminate human error. Some offices have brought back billing into their control and terminated the outsourcing.

– Are you kidding? Eliminate human error? Someone put you up to this didn’t they. And “outsourcing”? Once again, this is misleading and irresponsible information, Robert. What about keystroke errors? Only frustrated vendors wish computers would replace human intelligence.

3. Facilitate lab and prescription orders. Offices using e-scribe services are already on board into accepting the benefits of an EMR.

– So does this mean that when the lab delivery person comes to my office to pick up plaster models of a patient’s teeth, the prescription for the restoration must be sent separately by email instead of inserting a short hand-written note in the package… with the relevant patient’s models?

– I don’t sign enough prescriptions to make e-prescribing worth it. I really, really don’t. So how expensive would you make dental care?

4. Simple and efficient scheduling. The reception and schedulers are not tied to the telephone, fax and charting tasks as well as insurance verifications.

– That’s never before been a significant problem. Dental offices were run surprisingly efficient for decades before computers were around. Since dentistry is intricate handwork, the bottleneck in dental offices isn’t the front desk. It’s the dentist.

– What’s so wrong with telephone and fax, by the way? One doesn’t have to be a HIPAA-covered entity to use those tools.

– As for insurance verification, is the EDR intended to help the patient or the insurance company?

5. No fumbling for charts, paperwork, etc. (significant cost savings)

– Prove it.

6. Gain 15+ hours per week, back!

– Where did find this chunk of information? Please don’t insult us with wild, irresponsible statements to improve sales of your product. That would be unethical.

“Again, there are too many to list here, but contact me anytime for a quick on-site or online demonstration and let us prove to you that FirstEMR is the most appropriate solution to meet your required EMR needs.”

eDR Mandate? 

Did you intentionally say my “required” EMR needs? You wouldn’t be implying that EMRs are somehow “mandated” in dentistry are you, Robert? That would be called a rookie mistake and you would be about a year behind information published in the ADA News, which was wrong to mislead members on this point in 2008.

http://www.ada.org/5348.aspx

Rather than contacting you for a quick on-site or online demonstration, I’ll do you one better. I am to be interviewed on “The Whole Tooth” blogtalkradio on May 31 concerning the future of EHRs in dentistry. It promises to be an unprecedented discussion about the obscure topic, and is certain to be educational to thousands of dentists who have been misled for years about HIPAA and EDRs.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thewholetooth

Assessment

When the time comes, a telephone number will be provided for live questions. I invite you to call in, Robert, and we can discuss EHRs in dentistry before an audience of around 15,000.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

    

Is HI-TECH Dead?

Join Our Mailing List

You Decide!

[By D. Kellus Pruitt DDS]

Yesterday, Don Fluckinger, Features Writer for SearchhealthIT, posted “Blumenthal: Building national health network could take decades”

“When Dr. David Blumenthal was national health IT coordinator, he focused on 2015, the HITECH Act’s original target date for meeting meaningful use criteria. Now that he’s back in civilian life, he’s taking a longer view of the initiative to create a national health network triggered by the HITECH Act’s cash incentives to physicians and hospitals using electronic health record (EHR) systems.”

http://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/news/2240035845/Blumenthal-Building-national-health-network-could-take-decades

Even though Fluckinger assures us that post-ONC, Blumenthal is still a “HITECH Act champion,” I’m not so sure. Perhaps in spirit only!

A Multi-Decade Project?

Last week, Dr. Blumenthal was the keynote speaker at the Massachusetts annual health IT conference. According to Fluckinger, he told the audience that building a secure, national, interoperable health information system “was always going to be a multi-year, maybe even multi-decade project.” That’s not what I remember. I remember being told that if I didn’t purchase a network-ready EHR for my dental practice by 2014, I wouldn’t be paid by insurance companies.

What Happened?

So, what happened to President Bush’s 2004 Executive Order of “interoperability (even with dentists) by 2014”? Is it too soon to say that he failed? So who is going to tell the thousands of HIT stakeholders who have been attracted by the smell of stimulus billions? Blumenthal?

Assessment 

I can only imagine that now that Dr. Blumenthal left his job as head of the ONC for a new job as a health policy professor at Harvard School of Public Health, the openness of life outside government makes him uncomfortable with the lame talking points he once pushed as part of his job, without cracking a smile.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

On Track for Meaningful Use?

Are we on track to be a huge disappointment to our children’s children – or What?

[By Darrell K. Pruitt DDS]

When our grandchildren get the bill for the Obama administration’s subsidies benefitting primarily the health information technology industry, I bet they’re going to be really, really pissed at us for allowing today’s lawmakers to blow their 28 billion dollars to please HIT advocates who mislead consumers as well as lawmakers about the benefits of EHRs.

The Doctors Speak 

According to physicians who actually do the hard lifting in healthcare, the “meaningful use” requirements that they must prove in order to qualify for stimulus money will arguably increase both the cost and danger of healthcare – all for the benefit of stakeholders rather than principals. For one thing, “meaningful use” is meaningless if it fails to help physicians treat their patients. I think HIT stakeholders’ grandchildren should somehow be held accountable to my grandchildren.

Opposing Opinions  

Just days apart this week, two HIT reporters, Rich Daly from ModernHealthcare.com and Joseph Goedert from HealthDataManagment.com described two opposing letters the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) recently received: One from doctors and one from patients (et al).

On Monday, here is how Daly’s article “AMA to ONC: EHR program doesn’t work for docs” began:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110302/NEWS/303029950/1153

“Many physicians—specialists in particular—will not participate in the federal electronic health-record adoption incentive program because it requires them to include patient data that they do not otherwise collect, according to a Feb. 25 letter from 39 medical organizations letter to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology”

On Wednesday, Joseph Goedert, writing for HealthDataManagment.com began “Consumer Groups: Hold Strong on MU” with this:

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/meaningful-use-criteria-comments-consumers-42080-1.html

“A coalition of 25 consumer groups and unions is asking federal officials to hold firm on more stringent criteria for Stage 2 of electronic health records meaningful use, and expressing support for going further. For instance, because patients still trust their providers more than other information sources, holding providers accountable for actual usage of a patient Web portal ‘is entirely appropriate and we strongly urge ONC to resist pressure from the provider community to absolve them from responsibility for making these services available and useful to their patients,’ according to a comment letter to the Office of the National Coordinator”

  • AARP
  • Advocacy for Patients with Chronic Illness, Inc.
  • AFL-CIO
  • American Association on Health and Disability
  • American Hospice Foundation
  • Caring from a Distance
  • Center for Democracy & Technology
  • Childbirth Connection
  • Consumers for Affordable Health Care
  • Consumers Union
  • Families USA
  • Family Caregiver Alliance
  • Healthwise
  • Mothers Against Medical Error
  • National Alliance for Caregiving
  • National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
  • National Consumers League
  • National Family Caregivers Association
  • National Health Law Program
  • National Partnership for Women & Families
  • National Women’s Health Network
  • OWL – The Voice of Midlife and Older Women
  • SEIU
  • The Children’s Partnership

Like the “Record Demographics” MU mandate, this is all for the “common good” I suppose. Consumer Advocasy groups wouldn’t mislead patients, would they?

I doubt many Americans represented by these 25 organizations ever imagined a new federal requirement that doctors record each patient’s demographics. (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / page 1861; RIN 0938-AP78).

This means that the 25 stakeholder groups are doing their best to help American taxpayers hold physicians accountable to record and share their patients’ demographic information with the US government – private information about me and my family members that I personally don’t trust the government to be given – even if I’m in vulnerable need of health care.

Daly’s Article 

According to Daly’s article, the demands of MU are distractions for increasingly busy doctors and staff whose focus, I believe, should include eye-contact with patients with specific health problems rather than irrelevant data needs of third parties, including consumer advocacy groups.

On the other hand, if consumer advocacy groups have successfully defined for the federal government what clueless patients allegedly need, who will the mandate really benefit? 25 consumer advocacy groups don’t equal one consumer, so their letter isn’t grass roots at all. It’s deception wearing lipstick. Gullible and vulnerable patients are again being misrepresented by HIT stakeholders for a cut of our grandchildren’s 28 billion.

Assessment

Finally, if MU requirements are an arguably expensive and dangerous distraction for physicians, how can the law possibly be any less absurd for dentists? I’ll look at meaningful use as well at the ADA’s apparently flagging commitment to EHRs next. The ADA is abandoning state informatics departments – leaving them exposed to ADA members’ questions they are unable to answer. It looks to me that intra-ADA relationships are deteriorating quickly, but nevertheless, traditional stoicism still hasn’t been broken. “Image is everything” – ADA/IDM slogan.

Dentists

Here’s a teaser, dentists: Chances are, your state ADA organization hasn’t yet shared with you how the MU requirement of CPOE (Computerized physician order entry – page 1858) will change your practice communications. If you are a HIPAA-covered entity with an NPI number and you don’t email instructions to your denture lab rather than include a hand-written note with the relevant patient’s plaster models, you won’t qualify for stimulus money. What can possibly go wrong with that meaningful idea?

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

Is Informatics the The Curse of Healthcare Reform?

Join Our Mailing List

Medical Coding Complications and Greed

[By Darrell K. Pruitt DDS]

Coding complications in government healthcare ALWAYS favor the house — CMS guarantees it with lawsuits and whistleblower rewards that could attract dishonest employees. Are you careful who you hire?

Complications 

Complications in healthcare informatics – including 5-digit CPT® code mistakes as well as foul-ups that involve physicians’ “voluntary” 10-digit National Provider Identifier numbers – ALWAYS grant insurers more time to pay past-due bills owed to their clients and their clients’ doctors.

Call me Cynical 

Call me cynical, but if interest rates climb ever higher as predicted, watch for unexplained, proportional increases in coding errors to help fund insurance CFOs’ bonuses while raising the cost of healthcare even more without improving value. Is it any wonder why Americans don’t get the quality of healthcare we purchase compared to citizens in other countries? Tax-payers in my neighborhood are begging for in-network providers who put their patients’ interests ahead of insurers’ as much as allowed by insurers’ self-serving rules – without committing fraud. As a general rule, healthcare stakeholders accommodate parasites more than principals.

CPT® Codes and Patient Care 

Accurate CPT® coding may have nothing to do with patient care, but CMS makes it nevertheless important to physicians. Whereas the most innocent NPI foul-ups reliably delay payment and never turn out well for providers, the new fraud and abuse provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act [ACA] can cause an innocent coding mistake on a Medicare claim to land the doc in court with charges of fraud depending on the quality of employees one hires – but only if the error favors the provider and not the payer. In June, David Burda posted “Attorney tells audience to brace for a storm of whistle-blower lawsuits” on ModernHealthcare.com.

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100623/NEWS/306209989/-1

Of Whistle-Blower Lawsuits

Burda reports that healthcare attorney Joanne Judge, a partner with Stevens & Lee in Reading, Pa., predicts a significant increase in whistle-blower lawsuits simply because the new law makes it far too easy for a dishonest employee to file an unwarranted lawsuit. No longer is there a requirement for the whistleblower, who stands to win money from his or her patriotic effort, to directly witness the crime. That kind of idea could catch on in this economy.

computer-hardware1

“The new law also converts accidental Medicare overpayments to providers into potential false claims, Judge said. She said the law considers an overpayment as fraud if the overpayment isn’t identified by the provider and returned to the government within 60 days. Judge said that will require providers to beef up their internal billing systems to detect an overpayment as soon as possible and then send Medicare back its money.”

Assessment 

What can possibly go wrong with that plan? Thorough background checks on all new employees is increasingly important, doc. For my employment security issues, I’ve learned to depend on Richard at Investigation Resource Service out of Dallas. He’s never let me down (This is not a paid ad).

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details 

%d bloggers like this: