MILLIONAIRES: Retirement Accounts Are Up!

By Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Retirement Accounts are Minting Millionaires

It’s good to have money stashed in the stock market when the market is doing well. The number of people with at least $1 million in their 401(k) and IRA accounts jumped 12% in the second quarter 2024, according to a report from Fidelity Investments, largely tracking the market’s gain during that period. It’s the third straight quarter of growth in $1+ million accounts and close to a record high.

But start saving now, because building a hard-boiled nest egg through retirement accounts takes time: The average age of a 401(k) millionaire is 59, Fidelity said.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Thank You

***

***

[Doctor’s] Guide to Roth IRAs

Get Rich Slowly

By Ann Miller RN, MHA

[Executive Director]

Join Our Mailing List

From time to time, our readers send in e-books, files or e-chapters, pamphlets or other material they have created for client, educational or marketing use. Some of it may be worthwhile; some not so.

Nevertheless, these publications are often a good place to start the conversation, or thought-process on related topics. They will be occasionally offered as a complimentary membership feature of the Medical Executive-Post. We trust they are beneficial to you.

Guide to Roth IRAs [author]

  • JD Roth

Link: The GRS Guide to Roth IRAs

Disclaimer

No advice is offered. We make no copyright claim to these works. Veracity and information should be considered time sensitive. Consult a professional for your situation.

Assessment

Feel free to send in your own material for the benefit of all Medical Executive-Post readers and subscribers. All works will be considered; but not necessarily published.

More

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Product Details  Product Details

Should the Government Mandate 401(k) Annuities?

About the Guaranteed Retirement Accounts Proposal
By Robert Giese
bob.giese@chsfl.org

Recent hearings in the House and Senate have focused on the need for 401(k) and IRA accounts to provide better retirement income. Vice President Joe Biden referred to these discussions in the White House Task Force on the Middle Class. He suggested creating “Guaranteed Retirement Accounts [GRAs].”

The guaranteed retirement accounts may replace conventional 401(k)s and could eventually provide annuity income to individuals.

Response to GAO Report

In response to a White House request, the General Accounting Office (GAO) released a report on April 28, 2010 that discussed some of these retirement issues. The GAO noted that a couple age 62 has at least a 47% probability that one of the two spouses will live to age 90. While life expectancy is in the mid-to-late 70s when one is born, the age at maturity increases as we grow older. Therefore, the average retirement age couple in America has a reasonable prospect that the survivor will live to be age 90.

GAO reports that Social Security is the primary support for lower income retired Americans. For the median retired person, Social Security is expected to provide approximately 47% of retirement income. The balance will come from savings or investments, a qualified plan such as a 401(k) or IRA and retirement earnings from employment.

Better than Conservative Investments?

The GAO report notes that an annuity may provide more income than a conservative investment, such as a bond or CD.

Assessment

Republican lawmakers this week wrote a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and expressed concern about the guaranteed retirement accounts. They noted that a number of the witnesses before the various committees would “dismantle the present private-sector 401(k) system” and replace it with the GRA.
Their letter expressed concern and opposition to any effort to “nationalize” the 401(k) system. The Republican lawmakers continued by noting that over 90% of households have a favorable opinion of 401(k) or IRA accounts.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Is this new vehicle really better than a bond or CD? Is it the correct vehicle for a long-term retirement strategy? Is it even appropriate for physicians and medical professionals?

Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed

And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product Details  Product Details

Non-Traditional Property and Liability Insurance Coverage for Doctors

Review of Other Insurance Forms for Medical Providers

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™

Publisher-in-Chief

dem23Obviously, not all forms of P and L insurance coverage can be described in detail on this post. However, the healthcare professional or medical practitioner should consider these other forms of commercial property and liability coverage.

Directors and Officers Liability Insurance

The officers and directors of large practices, or healthcare facilities can be held personally accountable, and thus liable, for breaches of their duties by a number of parties.

Commercial Automobile / Vehicle Insurance

As the name suggests, this coverage provides protection for any commercial vehicles owned and operated by the healthcare corporation. If the practice or facility owns automobiles or other vehicles that are used in the “usual and customary” business activities, this coverage is required.  The policy-owner should be aware of the nine classifications of automobiles insured to ensure that coverage is appropriate.

Commercial Umbrella Liability Insurance

This coverage is very similar to the umbrella coverage that falls under the personal coverage area. Again, risks above the limits established by the underlying commercial liability coverage trigger the umbrella policy. The word of caution for this coverage is “Read the Provisions Carefully” as there is little standardization among insurance companies. Make sure the umbrella policy covers what you want it to cover, with the right limits of benefits and “trigger” points, with proper exclusions, and proper endorsements (if being used specifically for a medical practice.)

Employee Benefits Liability Insurance

Virtually each medical practice or healthcare facility has employee non-cash benefits in addition to their payroll. These benefits usually include group insurance and some form of retirement plan (a 401(k), for example). Nevertheless, each of these benefit packages expose the employer to liabilities under state and federal statutes. Employee Benefits Liability Insurance covers an employer, or if so stipulated by some policies, the employees who act on behalf of the employer, against liability claims involving alleged errors or omissions, or improper advice or administration of the employee fringe benefit plans.  For example, an employer may be liable for not enrolling an employee on a timely manner resulting in no medical coverage. Frequent litigation also arises out of violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974.  Since 1974, the provisions and reach of this Act has become massive and errors can occur.insurance-book3

Disclaimer: The author is a former licensed insurance agent and certified financial planner and advisor.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated. What have we missed, and who might wish to update this post?

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio:

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Product Details  Product Details

Paradigm Shift to “Defined Health Contributions” from “Defined Health Benefits” Plans

What it is – How it Works

By Staff Reporters

Join Our Mailing List 

In the past, according to Robert James Cimasi MHA AVA CMP™ of Health Capital Consultants LLC in St. Louis MO, many employers had defined retirement benefits for employees. Today, most retirement benefits are in the form of 401K plans where companies make defined contributions, effectively shifting the financial risk of paying for retirement to employees.

Defined Health Contributions

Defined health contributions are similar to employer-funded defined retirement contributions like 401K plans. Currently, employers pay for some portion of about half of Americans’ health insurance. Traditional employer-funded plans are those for which the employee simply fills out a form; that is, an employer will offer one or possibly two health insurance plans, and the employee fills out application paperwork. The employer administers the plan and may charge the employee a portion of the monthly premium or pay the entire premium themselves. A defined contribution plan allows companies to shift the financial risk of paying for rising health insurance costs.

Defined Health Benefits

Although part of the “benefit” of a health benefit plan is that the employer also takes care of all the administrative paperwork related to the insurance, companies are increasingly uninvolved in the administration process, opting instead to let the employee decide which plan out of many choices suits them best. For example, if an employer typically spends about $5,000 per employee per year on health benefits, the employer would use that money as a “defined contribution.” The employee then has $5,000 to spend per year on benefits, but instead of using the employer-defined health plan, the employee may choose from a variety of HMOs, preferred provider organizations PPOs, or other health plans. If the insurance premiums rise above this amount, the employee must make up the difference.

dhimc-book24Defined Contribution Package

Many employers are currently offering a defined contribution package to their employees. The definition of “defined contributions,” however, can range from one in which employers are completely uninvolved in the administration of benefits and simply give their employees cash or vouchers for the amount contributed that they can use to buy coverage, to a more “defined choice model” where employers offer a variety of health options at differing price levels along with a premium dollar contribution, and a variety of other options in between.

Risk Shifting

Thus, defined contributions shift the financial risk from the employer to the employee. Defined care is not a replacement for managed care, but will probably cause managed care to adapt under these new systems. That is, HMOs, PPOs and other managed care plans still appear to be the main choices in a defined care environment, so they are in fact a part of the system.

Assessment

Another challenge with a defined health benefit program is that the concept of risk-pooling becomes more difficult. In traditional employer-sponsored plans, rates are usually based on the pool of employees; a chronically ill employee who tries to find insurance independently may face rates drastically higher than if they had participated in an employer-sponsored plan.

MORE: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Product DetailsProduct Details

Product Details

 

Physician Retirement Threats and Opportunities

Investing Vehicle Updates for Modernity

By Steven Podnos; MD, MBA, CFP®

coins

Most physicians count on their retirement plans for the bulk of their financial security. Yet, few of us understand the intricate workings of these plans, and are therefore misled or at the least miss out on a number of cost savings and benefits. Here are some examples to consider, especially during this time of financial upheaval:

1. Jim L, an endocrinologist in private practice, works with his wife as office manager and has four other employees.  Jim had a “free” prototype profit sharing plan with a well known brokerage and has been putting 15% of his total employee compensation away every year in order to fund about $35,000 dollars a year into his own plan.  He pays his wife $60,000 dollars a year in order to get a $9,000 dollar annual contribution for her, but at a social security cost of the same $9,000 dollars.  His plan is invested in a variety of “loaded” mutual funds and stocks at the brokerage, and he was not really sure how it was doing in terms of performance.

Change:

The plan was changed to a customized 401k/profit sharing plan using a Third Party Administrator at a cost of 2500 dollars.  Jim’s wife lowered her salary to $20,000 dollars, which saved over $5,000 dollars a year in social security taxes.  Yet Jim and his wife were now able to contribute over $65,000 dollars in pretax money (rather than $44,000 dollars in prior years.  His employee cost for the plan dropped from 15% of a $100,000dollar payroll to 6%, another annual savings of $9,000 dollars. 

2. Statewide Healthcare medical group had an insurance based “retirement” plan.  All of the investments allowed were wrapped in variable annuity/insurance wrappers with an annual expense ratio of between 2 and 4% annually. The plan was “free” to the group but did not allow any differentiation in benefits or contributions between the physicians and their employees

Change:

An unbundled 401k/profit sharing plan was designed that allowed physicians to contribute the maximum in salary deferral and profit sharing contributions. Using an age-weighted contribution formula, the physicians were able to put away 14% of their salary in the profit sharing plan as compared with a 5% contribution for employees.  The new investment portfolios carried an annual cost well below 1% annually and were actively monitored by a fee only fiduciary advisor, mostly relieving the group from the fiduciary responsibility for the fund investments.

3. Kirk L, an orthopedic surgeon employed his wife and 5 employees in a busy practice.  He is 55 years of age and looking towards retirement in ten years.  He had a reasonably well designed 401k/profit sharing plan advisor which let him and his wife put away about 70-75 thousand dollars a year with an employee cost of about 15 thousand dollars. He was beginning to worry about not having enough savings to make his retirement goal.

Change:

Kirk and two of his younger employees were switched to a new Defined Benefit plan, but also continued in the 401k salary deferral plan. Kirk’s wife and the remaining employees stayed in the old plan and his wife’s salary was reduced to lower Social Security costs.  With the new plan, Kirk and his wife are now putting away about $200,000 dollars in pretax contributions annually at a marginally higher cost for the employees.

Poorly Designed Retirement Plans

None of these stories are unusual, in fact they are typical.  Most physician retirement plans are poorly designed, expensive and misunderstood.  Few existing plans are updated to capture the many positive changes made in tax law over the last decade.  Many plans are shoddily designed to catch the “quick” dollar, with financially terrible consequences to the physicians.

Qualified Plans

And so, I’ll review the most common types of retirement plans available to medical practices and discuss the pros, cons and specific opportunities each type for most practices. Note that most of these plans are considered “qualified” plans by the US Government.  Being qualified means that contributions to the plans are allowed to be deducted as business expenses and that the plan assets are generally protected from creditors.  In exchange, the government requires extensive paperwork and mandatory contributions for employees on the lower end of the salary scale. 

1. SEP-IRA

The SEP-IRA allows a fixed percentage of salary (up to 25% of W2 income) to be contributed to individual IRAs of most employees (including the physicians). There can be no discrimination in what percentage of compensation is used between owner/managers and lower paid employees, making this a relatively expensive plan in terms of employee funding. There is no component of salary deferral by employees, and all plan funding is immediately “vested” (belongs to the employee immediately if they leave employment).

The advantages of the SEP plan include a minimum of paperwork and ease of setup. Generally, SEP-IRA plans are used by small family owned businesses with few to no outside employees. It does work well for physicians that act as Independent Contractors (no employees) such as many Emergency Room physicians.  However, an individual contractor with an income of less than around $170,000 dollars can actually put more pre-tax money away in a Self-Employed 401k plan.

2. SIMPLE-IRA

This plan is another relatively easy one to set up and administer. It allows companies that have less than 100 employees to open individual IRA accounts for employees. The employees may defer salary in amounts of $10,500-$13,000 (depending on age), and the employer supplies a “match.” All money in the plan is immediately vested. The match is generally (but not always) a dollar for dollar matching contribution of up to 3% of the employee’s compensation.

For example, a company owner with a compensation of 100,000 dollars would be able to defer salary in an amount of up to $13,000 (if age 50 or older), and then have the company “match” 3% or $3,000 more. A SIMPLE IRA plan is a good choice for small businesses in which the owners are highly compensated, and few employees wish to defer salary. The disadvantages of the SIMPLE-IRA are immediate vesting for the matched funds, and relatively low total amounts of contributions compared to other qualified plans. 

NOTE:

I have seen these plans work well in small practices that wish to avoid paperwork, have few to no employees that wish to defer salary, and who don’t mind the limited ability to make contributions.  Note one unusual feature of this plan, in that the 3% match has no limits. I have seen one physician with a small group of employees and an income of $600,000 dollars per year put away 13,000 in salary deferrals and another ($600K X 3%) 18K in the match at no employee cost!

3. 401k/PROFIT SHARING PLAN

This is by far the most common type of qualified plan in existence.  These plans actually have three components:

 

a)       401k salary deferral-In 2008, employees may defer between 15,500 and 20,500 dollars. This money and earnings on it are not subject to Federal income tax until withdrawn in retirement, and are immediately vested.

b)       A “match”-this is an optional part of the plan in which an employer may offer to contribute a matching amount of dollars to give employees an incentive to participate.  Matching funds are usually subject to vesting on a time schedule.

c)       Profit sharing-like the match, this is a discretionary contribution by the employer of up to 25% of payroll and usually subject to vesting.

 

It is crucial to have a skilled plan designer customize a 401K plan for your individual practice.  The most common abuse of these plans is the use of “cookie cutter” prototype plans used by brokerages and insurance companies. These prototype plans are for the convenience and profit of the person “selling” the plan, and are a solid negative for the practice. Customization allows the physicians to have maximal participation at the lowest employee cost.

There is also a self employed 401k option for small practices that have no full time employees other than the physician and spouse. They operate in much the same way, but with little expense and much less paperwork.

4. DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN

Once common, these plans are now rarely used by most companies. They are based completely on company contributions to a fund (no salary deferral) that are actuarially designed to produce a set benefit amount at retirement. All the risk for providing the promised benefit is the responsibility of the employer, which is an advantage when the major beneficiary is the physician. Defined Benefit plans work best for practices in which the physician/employee ratio is low and the physician(s) is approaching age 50 or older. The advantage of this plan is allowing much higher contributions on a pretax basis, with the disadvantage of higher administrative costs. These plans work extremely well for high income businesses employing one individual (plus or minus a spouse) who is nearing age 50 or over. However, physician practices that employ a spouse or physicians of different ages can often use a Defined Benefit Plan in conjunction with a 401k/profit sharing plan to great benefit as in example three.

Assessment

Doctors have a tremendous opportunity to review and enhance the retirement plan options. Although the article focuses on these medical professionals and related occupations, much of the material applies to other professional and business clients.  A relationship with a good Third Party Administrator [TPA] and some independent study are invaluable to your ability to perform this function well.

Conclusion

Dr. Podnos is a fee-only financial planner and the author of “Building and Preserving Your Wealth, A Practical Guide to Financial Planning for Affluent Investors” (available at Amazon.com and bookstores). He can be reached at Steven@wealthcarellc.com And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com  or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos