SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

Posted on November 20, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

Shaping Well-being Beyond Medicine

Health is often thought of as the result of medical care, but in reality, it is deeply influenced by the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. These conditions, known as social determinants of health, include a wide range of social, economic, and environmental factors that shape health outcomes. They are responsible for many of the differences in health status between individuals and communities. Understanding these determinants is essential for promoting fairness in health and designing policies that reduce disparities.

Economic Stability

Economic stability is one of the most powerful determinants of health. Individuals with steady income can afford nutritious food, safe housing, and preventive healthcare. Conversely, poverty increases vulnerability to chronic diseases, mental health challenges, and limited access to medical services. Families with fewer financial resources may struggle to afford medications or healthy diets, leading to higher rates of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Unemployment or unstable work further exacerbates stress, which itself is linked to poor health outcomes. Economic inequality directly translates into health inequality.

Education

Education shapes health both directly and indirectly. Higher educational attainment is associated with better employment opportunities, higher income, and improved health literacy. People with more education are more likely to understand medical information, adopt healthy behaviors, and navigate healthcare systems effectively. Limited education can perpetuate cycles of poverty and poor health. For instance, children who grow up in underfunded schools may face restricted opportunities, leading to lower lifetime earnings and poorer health outcomes. Education is therefore a critical lever for breaking intergenerational cycles of disadvantage.

***

***

Neighborhood and Physical Environment

The environment in which individuals live plays a crucial role in determining health. Safe neighborhoods with clean air, accessible parks, and reliable transportation promote physical activity and reduce exposure to pollutants. In contrast, communities with high crime rates, poor housing, and environmental hazards contribute to stress, injury, and illness. Food deserts—areas with limited access to affordable, healthy food—are a striking example of how environment shapes health. Residents in these areas often rely on processed foods, increasing risks of obesity and related diseases. Housing quality also matters: overcrowding, mold, or lead exposure can lead to respiratory illnesses and developmental delays.

Healthcare Access and Quality

Access to healthcare is a fundamental determinant, but it is shaped by social and economic factors. Insurance coverage, affordability, and cultural competence of providers influence whether individuals receive timely and effective care. Marginalized groups often face barriers such as discrimination, language differences, or lack of nearby facilities. Even when healthcare is available, disparities in quality persist. For example, minority populations may receive less aggressive treatment for certain conditions compared to others. Addressing these inequities requires systemic reforms that prioritize inclusivity and affordability.

Social and Community Context

Social relationships and community support networks significantly affect health. Strong social ties provide emotional support, reduce stress, and encourage healthy behaviors. Communities with high levels of trust and civic engagement often experience better health outcomes. Conversely, discrimination, racism, and social exclusion undermine health by increasing stress and limiting opportunities. Social cohesion and equity are therefore vital for fostering healthier societies.

Conclusion

The social determinants of health highlight that medicine alone cannot ensure well-being. Economic stability, education, environment, healthcare access, and social context collectively shape health outcomes and drive disparities. Addressing these determinants requires a holistic approach that integrates public health, social policy, and community action. By investing in education, reducing poverty, improving neighborhoods, and ensuring equitable healthcare, societies can move closer to achieving health equity. Ultimately, health is not just about treating illness—it is about creating conditions in which everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Quality Initiatives, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Understanding the Tele-Medicine Paradox in Healthcare

Posted on October 17, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

***

A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one’s expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true or apparently true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time. They result in “persistent contradiction between interdependent elements” leading to a lasting “unity of opposites”.

THE TELE-MEDICINE PARADOX

Classic Definition: Refers specifically to the treatment of various medical conditions without seeing the patient in person. Healthcare providers may use electronic and internet platforms like live video, audio, PCs, tablets, or instant messaging to address a patient’s concerns and diagnose their condition remotely.

Modern Circumstance: This may include giving medical advice, walking them through at-home exercises, or recommending them to a local provider or facility. Even more exciting is the emergence of telemedicine apps which give patients access to care right from their phones or computer screens.

Historical Digital Health and Tele-Medicine?

Paradox Examples: Treating certain conditions remotely can be challenging. Tele-medicine is often used to treat common illnesses, manage chronic conditions, or provide specialist services. If a patient is dealing with an emergent or serious condition, the remote provider suggests they seek in-person medical care.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like and Subscribe

***

***

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, iMBA, Inc., Information Technology, Marcinko Associates, Research & Development, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

HAPPY: Labor Day 2025

Posted on September 1, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dear Medical Executive-Post Readers and Subscribers

***

HISTORY OF LABOR DAY

The first Labor Day holiday was celebrated on Sept. 5th, 1882, in New York City, in accordance with the plans of the Central Labor Union. President Grover Cleveland signed a law on June 28th, 1894, that made the first Monday in September of each year a national holiday, according to the Department of Labor.

***

***

MY SEPTEMBER HEALTH RE-SET

To give my health a boost after Labor Day, I’m taking a complete break from alcohol, sugar, cookies, ice cream, coffee and tea for the entire month of September. Besides that, I’ll also prioritize sleep and increase my exercise from 7 to at least 10 times [hours] a week. This will allow me to focus on my diet and mental well-being. It’s essentially a month of health and wellness rejuvenation.

I’ve chosen to focus on alcohol and sugar because I want to challenge the idea that moderate drinking is part of a healthy lifestyle. In reality, only those who maintain a healthy lifestyle can afford to enjoy alcohol in moderation. But, sugar is everywhere and must be minimized for Type II diabetes and weight control.

Moreover, the long-term and excessive intake of sugary beverages and refined sugars can negatively impact your overall caloric intake and create a domino effect on your health. For example, excess sugar in the body can turn into fat deposits and lead to fatty liver disease.

A low sugar diet can help you lose weight and also help you manage and/or prevent diabetes, heart disease and stroke, reduce inflammation, and even improve your mood and the health of your skin. That’s why the low sugar approach is a key tenet of other well-known healthy eating patterns, such as the Mediterranean diet and the DASH diet.

QUESTION: And so, do you also commit to such “factory resets” now and then? Please comments.

Do, enjoy the Labor Day Weekend, Bar-B-Ques with friends, family and colleagues. And, I hope you continue to find the Medical Executive-Post useful!

Many thanks for your likes and referrals.
Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP
[Editor and Chief]

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Ethics, Events-Planner, iMBA, iMBA, Inc., Marcinko Associates, Quality Initiatives, Sponsors | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

PHYSICIAN BURNOUT: Causes and Conclusions

Posted on August 29, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

***

***

Healthcare comes with its share of mental challenges, especially considering that clinicians often care for patients when they’re in difficult and sometimes tragic situations. New research shows that even the path to getting into the workforce can be a challenge, with some physicians burning out before they make it to graduation.

***

American medicine is undergoing vast changes, placing the status of physicians in the medical industrial complex at great risk. Most physicians feel overwhelmed by increasing bureaucratic mandates from insurers, hospitals, and government. At the same time, physicians are the front line employees of healthcare and assume the majority of the risk for patient care. This has left many in the profession with increasing disillusionment. 

Samantha Meltzer-Brody a psychiatrist and director of, Taking Care of Our Own, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC states it best:

“Daily, I am contacted by good doctors who are struggling with symptoms of burnout syndrome and who have become overwhelmed by the challenges of attempting to practice medicine in today’s health care environment. As a psychiatrist who runs a program to address and treat these distressed doctors, I am troubled by the ever-growing number of calls I receive.”

What causes physician burnout?

The “Big 4” factors known to contribute to stress and burnout include:

  1. Time pressure, especially in patient visits or documentation
  2. Lack of control over work environment
  3. Chaotic, fast-paced workplaces
  4. Culture of the organization, specifically a culture that does not emphasize communication, cohesion, trust, and alignment of values between clinicians and their leaders

In addition to burnout rates, these factors can be assessed to help direct interventions toward those drivers that are most likely to be contributing to burnout at your organization.

OK BURNOUT: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2022/08/30/u-s-hospitals-feeling-the-pain-of-physician-burnout/

***

***

The burned-out physician is exhausted — mentally and physically — and often no longer able to find empathy or connection with patients. The question of how to escape from what has become a highly unpleasant situation becomes a frequent one. Given the high demands of the profession and serious consequences of mistakes, the burned-out doctor is a potentially impaired one. And the impaired physician is not able to maintain the unflappable, perpetually cool under fire, always objective, professional and yet compassionate demeanor that is expected by society. Worst of all, the impaired physician is at great risk for developing depression, suicidal ideation, or a serious addiction.

The doctors who contact me report feeling beaten down by an increasingly hostile work environment. They say that they don’t have time to take care of patients the way they envisioned when they decided to apply to medical school. Many describe feeling betrayed by a system that they say seems focused on achieving the bottom line with little regard for the impact on both doctors and patients.

Most of these doctors report spending a significant amount of their time dealing with the electronic medical record and documentation. The ratio of time spent on doctor-patient

interactions compared to physician-computer ones appears so horribly skewed that it has reached the point of complete dysmorphia. These good physicians call me when they feel like they can’t continue any longer in the profession. They want to quit medicine. They report a loss of joy and meaning in their work. They describe the toll that the profession has had on their mental health, physical health, and personal lives. And most wrenchingly, they don’t see an end.

What can we do? There are no easy answers to the complex issues that threaten our profession.  “The Taking Care of Our Own Program…has had an over 200% rate of growth in the first year, reflecting the enormous need…”  

PHYSICIAN COACHING: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/coach/

Assessment

Burned out physicians will eventually be labeled as disruptive, impaired, an outlier or arrogant.  There’s a reason it’s difficult and extremely expensive for physicians to find disability insurance; psychiatric claims.  Burnout leads to depression, anxiety, PTSD, suicide, divorce, drug abuse, surly behaviors and interactions, etc.  It’s nothing new; it’s been occurring for a long time.  Go without routine sleep, eat erratically, work long hours, operate under constantly stressful situations and have no time for your family or self and most individuals will de-compensate physically and psychologically within weeks. 

Conclusion

Physicians operate within these parameters year after year. 

How are they to remain healthy, functional humans? They can’t.  Even a superhero couldn’t, yet physicians are expected to endure and thrive under such conditions. 

If a physician makes a single mistake, or snaps just one day, their entire career is on the line.

***

***

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Ask a Doctor, Career Development, Ethics, Experts Invited, Glossary Terms, Marcinko Associates, mental health | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

PHYSICIAN DIVORCE: Within the Medical Profession

Posted on August 14, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

***

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

DIVORCE WITHIN THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

A Johns Hopkins University study, by Michael J. Klag MD in 1997, found that physicians in some specialties — chiefly psychiatry and surgery — are at higher risk for divorce than their medical brethren in other fields. But, the results did not support the common view that job-related anxiety and depression are linked to marital breakup. Alerting medical students to the risks of divorce in some specialties may influence their career choices and strengthen their marriages whatever field they choose. The study, supported by the National Institutes of Health [NIH], was published in the March 13th issue of The New England Journal of Medicine. Results also strongly suggested that the high divorce risk in some specialties may result from the inherent demands of the job as well as the emotional experiences of physicians who enter those fields.

BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS: Top 10 Tips for Medical Professionals

***

***

Divorce Prone Medical Specialties*

For example, the Hopkins team assessed the specialty choices, marriage histories, psychological characteristics, and other career and personal factors of 1,118 physicians who graduated from The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine from 1948 through 1964. Over 30 years of follow-up, the divorce rate was 51 percent for psychiatrists, 33 percent for surgeons, 24 percent for internists, 22 percent for pediatricians and pathologists, and 31 percent for other specialties. The overall divorce rate was 29 percent after three decades of follow-up and 32 percent after nearly four decades of follow-up.

Physicians who married before medical school graduation had a higher divorce rate than those who waited until after graduation (33 percent versus 23 percent). The year of first marriage was linked with divorce rates: 11 percent for marriages before 1953, 17 percent for those from 1953 to 1957, 24 percent for those from 1958 to 1962 and 21 percent for those after 1962. Those who had a parent die before medical school graduation had a lower divorce rate.

Female physicians had a higher divorce rate (37 percent) than their male colleagues (28 percent). Physicians who were members of an academic honor society in medical school had a lower divorce rate, although there was no difference in divorce rates according to class rank. Religious affiliation, being an only child, having a parent who was a physician and having a divorced parent were not associated with divorce rates. Physicians who reported themselves to be less emotionally close to their parents and who expressed more anger under stress also had a significantly higher divorce rate, but anxiety and depression levels were not associated with divorce rates.

MEDIATION: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2024/09/15/financially-egalitarian-dating-marriages-and-divorce-mediation-for-doctors/

*Cite: Co-authors of the study, which was part of the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study, an ongoing, prospective study of physicians from the Hopkins medical school graduating classes of 1948 through 1964, were lead author Bruce L. Rollman, M.D., Lucy A. Mead, Sc.M., and Nae-Yuh Wang, M.S.

***

***

The Painful Truth

In their article “The Painful Truth: Physicians Are Not Invincible” [1] Miller and McGowen state that divorce rates among physicians have been reported to be 10% to 20% higher than those in the general population. They explain that for many years in pre-med college, medical school, and residency, physicians focus on getting through the next hurdle. They may postpone the pleasures of life that others enjoy.  Compulsive traits that allow them to postpone enjoyment may have the unwanted consequence of leading to more distant relationships., thus placing strain on intimate relationships.

A 2002 study looking at dual physician marriages found they have a relatively low divorce rate of 11%. “They’re a happily married cohort,” says Dr Wayne Sotile of the Sotile Cetner for Resilience (www.sotile.com). “They’re more compassionate about the passion for the career — they understand the calling because they share it.”

A study published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 1997 with Bruce L. Rollman as the lead researcher [2] found that physicians in some specialties — chiefly psychiatry and surgery — are at higher risk for divorce than their medical brethren in other fields. Alerting medical students to the risks of divorce in some specialties may influence their career choices and strengthen their marriages whatever field they choose.

The study suggested that the high divorce risk in some specialties may result from the inherent demands of the job as well as the emotional experiences of physicians who enter those fields. The divorce rate was 51 percent for psychiatrists, 33 percent for surgeons, 24 percent for internists, 22 percent for pediatricians and pathologists, and 31 percent for other specialties.

The overall divorce rate was 29 percent after three decades of follow-up and 32 percent after nearly four decades of follow-up. Physicians who married before medical school graduation had a higher divorce rate than those who waited until after graduation (33 percent versus 23 percent). Female physicians had a higher divorce rate (37 percent) than their male colleagues (28 percent).

***

***

References:

  1. Miller, M. N., McGowen, R., 2000, “The painful truth: Physicians are not invincible,” Southern Medical Journal, 93: 966-973.
  2. Rollman BL, Mead LA, Wan NY, Klag MJ. Medical specialty and the incidence of divorce. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:800–3

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like and Subscribe

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Career Development, Ethics, finance, mental health, Professional Liability | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Gerontologist V. Geriatrician?

Posted on July 9, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Career Development, CMP Program, Experts Invited, Financial Planning, Glossary Terms, LifeStyle, mental health | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Gerontologist V. Geriatrician?

FLEXNER REPORT: Medical Education

Posted on February 4, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Staff Reporters

***

***

According to Wikipedia, the Flexner Report was a book-length landmark report of medical education in the United States and Canada, written by Abraham Flexner and published in 1910 under the aegis of the Carnegie Foundation. Flexner not only described the state of medical education in North America, but he also gave detailed descriptions of the medical schools that were operating at the time. He provided both criticisms and recommendations for improvements of medical education in the United States.

Many aspects of the present-day American medical profession stem from the Flexner Report and its aftermath. While it had many positive impacts on American medical education, the Flexner report has been criticized for introducing policies that encouraged systemic racism and sexism.

The Report, also called Carnegie Foundation Bulletin Number Four, called on American medical schools to enact higher admission and graduation standards, and to adhere strictly to the protocols of mainstream science principles in their teaching and research. The report talked about the need for revamping and centralizing medical institutions. Many American medical schools fell short of the standard advocated in the Flexner Report and, subsequent to its publication, nearly half of such schools merged or were closed outright.

Colleges for the education of the various forms of alternative medicine, such as electro-therapy were closed. Homeopathy, traditional osteopathy, eclectic medicine, and physiomedicalism (botanical therapies that had not been tested scientifically) were derided.

The Report also concluded that there were too many medical schools in the United States, and that too many doctors were being trained. A repercussion of the Flexner Report, resulting from the closure or consolidation of university training, was the closure of all but two black medical schools and the reversion of American universities to male-only admittance programs to accommodate a smaller admission pool.

In Chapter 11, Flexner stressed that the success of medical education reform and the professionalization of medicine relied heavily on the effective legal and ethical functioning of state medical boards. However, he noted that these boards were failing in their mission, stalling progress and allowing substandard medical practices to continue, thereby jeopardizing public health. This problem persists as a significant issue in the current practice of medicine in the United States.

Subscribe and Refer

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

***

***

Filed under: "Doctors Only", Book Reviews, Career Development, Ethics, Experts Invited, Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »