GAO RREPORT: Rising Physician Consolidation Increases Prices

By Health Capital Consultants, LLC

***

***

On September 22, 2025, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report estimating “the Extent and Effects of Physician Consolidation.” The GAO, the non-partisan audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress, undertook the analysis of physician consolidation in response to lawmakers’ request.

This Health Capital Topics article reviews the GAO report and stakeholder reactions. (Read more…) 

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Refer, Like and Subscribe

***

GAO Healthcare Marketplace Undercover Testing in 2016

Is Your Membership Enrollment Process Leaving you Exposed?

By http://www.MCOL.com

***

***

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

***

Financial Reform Amendment Would Address Loan Modification Problems

Proposed New ‘Office of the Homeowner Advocate’

By Paul Kiel, ProPublica – May 7, 2010 11:37 am EDT

An amendment to the financial reform bill filed recently by Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., and Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, would create a special office to assist homeowners who are facing problems with the administration’s mortgage modification program. The measure has White House support [1], but is opposed by the financial services industry.

Mortgage Servicers

As we’ve reported, homeowners and housing counselors frequently complain that mortgage servicers frequently lose financial documents [2] and make mistakes [3]—mistakes that can result in foreclosure [4]. Homeowners regularly wait several months [5] for an answer on their application.

About $75 billion has been earmarked for the program from the TARP [6], but very little of that has so far been spent owing to the small number of permanent modifications so far: about 228,000 as of March [7].

The amendment proposes a new “Office of the Homeowner Advocate” that would be devoted to solving homeowner problems with the program. Right now, homeowners with complaints are told to call the HOPE Hotline, which has a staff of counselors to handle escalations—a process that’s been criticized as ineffective [8].

[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=mortgage+reform&iid=1896936″ src=”a/3/e/7/Jesse_Jackson_Rallies_e4dd.jpg?adImageId=12804308&imageId=1896936″ width=”380″ height=”246″ /]

Office of Homeowner Advocate

Under the amendment, all homeowner complaints about servicers would go to this new “Office of the Homeowner Advocate” within the Treasury Department. That would effectively create an appeals process for homeowners who think they’ve been wrongly denied a modification—something that housing counselors and other consumer advocates have long said is desperately needed [9].

“A mandated homeowner’s advocate, built into the process and reportable to Congress, would counteract the servicer unresponsiveness we’ve heard so much about and be able to serve as a recourse for homeowners,” said Richard H. Neiman, superintendent of banks for New York State and a member of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the TARP. Neiman has been pushing for the creation of the office.

The office would have the power to penalize servicers for noncompliance with the program‘s guidelines, but would need the sign-off from Herb Allison, the Treasury official in charge of the TARP, to do so. The Treasury currently has the power to penalize services, but so far has not done so [10].

Financial Services Industry Opposition

The idea has already garnered opposition from the financial services industry. Scott Talbott, a lobbyist with the Financial Services Roundtable, which counts the largest mortgage servicers among its many members [11], said the group opposed the amendment because it would just create “another layer of bureaucracy that could actually slow” the program’s process. He also said there is already adequate oversight of the program.

One of the watchdogs that over-sees the TARP, the Government Accountability Office, reported in March (PDF) that servicers have widely varying ways of dealing with homeowner complaints and some were not systematically tracking them. Several tracked only written ones, the GAO said. Another servicer had closely tracked only those complaints that were addressed to a company executive.

“The unnecessary problems with HAMP are found mostly with servicers who have provided inadequate, inconsistent service to homeowners and delayed or denied homeowner assistance on a mass basis,” said Alys Cohen of the National Consumer Law Center.

Join Our Mailing List

Assessment

The amendment has support from Americans for Financial Reform [12] and a host of consumer advocate groups, including the Center for Responsible Lending, the Service Employees International Union and the United Auto Workers.

The amendment also specifies that any candidate for the homeowner advocate position would have to come from an advocacy background and cannot have worked for a servicer or the Treasury in the previous four years. The advocate’s office would be funded out of the TARP and close down after the federal program ends. The idea is modeled after the Internal Revenue Service’s “taxpayer advocate.” [13] It’s not clear when the amendment might come up for a vote.

Link: http://www.propublica.org/ion/loan-mods/item/financial-reform-amendment-would-address-loan-mod-problems-with-homeowner-a

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Do you agree with this new proposal? How might medical professionals and/or financial advisors be affected?

Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed

And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product Details  Product Details

Should the Government Mandate 401(k) Annuities?

About the Guaranteed Retirement Accounts Proposal
By Robert Giese
bob.giese@chsfl.org

Recent hearings in the House and Senate have focused on the need for 401(k) and IRA accounts to provide better retirement income. Vice President Joe Biden referred to these discussions in the White House Task Force on the Middle Class. He suggested creating “Guaranteed Retirement Accounts [GRAs].”

The guaranteed retirement accounts may replace conventional 401(k)s and could eventually provide annuity income to individuals.

Response to GAO Report

In response to a White House request, the General Accounting Office (GAO) released a report on April 28, 2010 that discussed some of these retirement issues. The GAO noted that a couple age 62 has at least a 47% probability that one of the two spouses will live to age 90. While life expectancy is in the mid-to-late 70s when one is born, the age at maturity increases as we grow older. Therefore, the average retirement age couple in America has a reasonable prospect that the survivor will live to be age 90.

GAO reports that Social Security is the primary support for lower income retired Americans. For the median retired person, Social Security is expected to provide approximately 47% of retirement income. The balance will come from savings or investments, a qualified plan such as a 401(k) or IRA and retirement earnings from employment.

Better than Conservative Investments?

The GAO report notes that an annuity may provide more income than a conservative investment, such as a bond or CD.

Assessment

Republican lawmakers this week wrote a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and expressed concern about the guaranteed retirement accounts. They noted that a number of the witnesses before the various committees would “dismantle the present private-sector 401(k) system” and replace it with the GRA.
Their letter expressed concern and opposition to any effort to “nationalize” the 401(k) system. The Republican lawmakers continued by noting that over 90% of households have a favorable opinion of 401(k) or IRA accounts.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Is this new vehicle really better than a bond or CD? Is it the correct vehicle for a long-term retirement strategy? Is it even appropriate for physicians and medical professionals?

Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed

And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product Details  Product Details

Medicare GAO Report on Radiology

Prior Imaging-Authorization Suggested

Staff Reporters

As reported in the Wall Street Journal, on July 14, 2008, Medicare may be soon requiring prior authorization to curtail unnecessary utilization of CT scans, MRIs and other forms of medical imaging, a new Government Accounting Office [GAO] report suggests.

The Medicare Report

To cut imaging costs, Medicare has been reducing certain physician payments, sifting through its data to spot improper claims, and educating medical practitioners about the issue. But, the GAO reported that post-payment claims review alone is inadequate to manage medical imaging – one of the fastest growing parts of Medicare – and suggests that Medicare include prior authorization as a possible front-end tactic.

The Findings

The GAO pointed to new evidence of imaging overuse in physician practices, including:

  • The proportion of Medicare spending on in-office imaging rose from 58 percent to 64 percent from 2000 to 2006.
  • Imaging became an increasingly large slice of doctors’ revenue pie. For example, cardiologists got 36 percent of their total Medicare revenue from in-office imaging in 2006, compared with 23 percent in 2000.
  • In-office imaging spending per Medicare patient varied widely nationwide in 2006, from $62 in Vermont to $472 in Florida.

Assessment

What might proponents of the classic Dartmouth Study on healthcare quality say about these findings?

Conclusion

Please comment on the above; opinions from health economists, actuaries and our radiology colleagues are especially welcomed.

Speaker:If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com 

Subscribe Now:Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Copyright 2008 iMBA Inc: All rights reserved, USA, unless otherwise noted. Use is restricted to Medical Executive-Post subscribers only. No redistribution is allowed. To avoid violation of iMBA Inc copyright restrictions and redistribution policy, please register for your own free Medical Executive-Post membership. Detailed information and registration links are available at:

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Medical Executive-Post.

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details