Open Call for ME-P Contributors

Posted on June 8, 2025 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Call for Manuscripts, Articles, Essays, Comments or Opinions

Dear Medical and Financial Services Colleagues, Health Economists, CPAs, JDs, Insurance Agents and Consultants,

pc

The Medical Executive-Post (ME-P), supported by iMBA Inc., with (ISSN 13: 978-1-4665-5873-1] is currently accepting manuscripts for publication.

The ME-P is an open access, multidisciplinary, international, blind peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed electronic forum which publishes high-quality solicited and unsolicited research, commentary, opinions, curated news and review articles in English, in all areas of Physician Focused Financial Planning, health economics, finance, accounting, medical practice management, health law, IT, policy and administration. We have over 50 topic channels.

Rapid Response Peer-Review

ME-P is a rapid response forum that publishes daily. One of our objectives is to inform contributors (authors) of the decision on their manuscript(s) within 48 hours of submission. Following acceptance, a paper would be published in the next available issue. The ME-P provides immediate open access to published articles without any barrier.

***

escalators

[ME-P Fast Review, Turn-Around and Publishing Time]

***

Broad Exposure Potential

Publishing your news, opinions or comments, essays or articles with the ME-P means that they will be available to millions of readers and researchers because our large and diverse readership base comprises millions of collaborators. Our forum supports the free downloading of published articles by scholars for use as materials for lecture, by government officials for policy making, professors, colleges, universities and educators, and by corporate researchers and FAs to selected firms and organizations world-wide.

Blog Citations

blog citations

Assessment

Also, ME-P is a member of several local and international organizations, making it possible for the far and wide distribution of published materials. We ask you to support this initiative by publishing your thoughts, comments, articles and original paper(s) 0n this forum, and in our textbooks and white-papers, etc.

More:

Authors should send their materials or manuscript(s) as attached MSFT Word files to the following email: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com

Best regards,

Ann Ann Miller RN MHA

[Executive-Director]

http://www.MedicalExecutivePost.com

 Product DetailsProduct Details

Filed under: "Advisors Only", "Doctors Only", Accounting, Career Development | Tagged: , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Become a Published Print Author with Us

Posted on April 22, 2009 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

The Business of Medical Practice [3rd Edition]

By Hope Rachel Hetico RN, MHA, CMP™

[Managing Editor]biz-book7

Dear Colleagues,

As you may know, we are commencing work on the third edition of our best selling book: The Business of Medical Practice

TOC 1st: http://www.amazon.com/Business-Medical-Practice-Maximizing-Doctors/dp/0826113117/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1231111232&sr=1-8

TOC 2nd: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Invitation to Contribute

Accordingly, we would be honored for you to consider contributing a new or revised chapter, in your area of expertise, for a low-effort but high-yield contribution. Our goal is to help physician colleagues and management executives benefit from nationally known experts, as an essential platform for their success in the healthcare 2.0 business industry. Many topics are still available: [health accounting and costing; law, policy and administration; Medicare fraud and abuse; coding and insurance; HIT, grid and cloud computing; finance and economics, competitive models, collaboration and leadership, etc].

Support Always Available

Editorial support is available, and you would enjoy increasing subject-matter notoriety, exposure and public relations in an erudite and credible fashion. As a reader, or preferably a subscriber to the ME-P, your synergy in this space may be ideal. Time line for submission of a 5,000-7,500 word chapter is ample, and in a prose writing style that is “wide, not deep.” 

A Health 2.0 Initiative

And, be sure to address health 2.0 modernity. Update chapters from the second edition are also available. 

Definition: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/emerging-healthcare-20-initiatives

Assessment

Please contact me for more details, if interested. A best selling-book is rare; while a third-edition volume even more so. Join us in this project. Regardless, we trust you will remain apostles of our core ME-P vision, “uniting medical mission and financial profit margin”, promoting it whenever possible.

Front Matter Link: frontmatter1advancedbusinessmedicine4 

Contact Info:

MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

770.448.0769

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Filed under: "Advisors Only", "Doctors Only", Accounting, Book Reviews, Contest Entrance, Ethics, Experts Invited, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Healthcare Finance, iMBA, Inc., Information Technology, Marketing & Advertising, Media Mentions and PR, Nominations Sought, Practice Management, Quality Initiatives, Recommended Books, Research & Development, Risk Management, Sponsors | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Defining Comparative Medical Effectiveness

Posted on April 13, 2009 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

An Emerging Health Economics Issue

By Staff Reportersdhimc-book8

Comparative Medical Effectiveness [CME] is not a new healthcare term or health economics concept. Federal initiatives specifically promoting CME were authorized under the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, but the genesis took root decades before.

Finally … a Hot Topic

Comparative Medical Effectiveness has recently become a hot topic again throughout the arena of health care stakeholders, due to funding and initiatives advanced by the Obama administration, and the positive and negative reactions drawn by different sectors of stakeholders.

Related to Evidence Based Outcomes

For stakeholders including numerous health care policy organizations, the health plan industry, and various health care provider organizations: public and private promotion of Comparative Medical Effectiveness reviews and processes offer the potential for more evidence-based, outcome-benefit or even cost-benefit driven information to improve the health care decision making for all parties. And, for stakeholders concerned about limiting the role of government and third parties in their level of regulation and control over the direct delivery of specific patient care, Comparative Medical Effectiveness may become a lightening rod due to perceived potential as to how the process and information could ultimately be applied.

Definition of the CBO Report

The Congressional Budget Office Report “Comparative Effectiveness: Issues and Options for an Expanded Federal Role” offers the definition that follows:

“As applied in the health care sector, an analysis of comparative medical effectiveness is simply a rigorous evaluation of the impact of different options that are available for treating a given medical condition for a particular set of patients. Such a study may compare similar treatments, such as competing drugs, or it may analyze very different approaches, such as surgery and drug therapy. The analysis may focus only on the relative medical benefits and risks of each option, or it may also weigh both the costs and the benefits of those options. In some cases, a given treatment may prove to be more effective clinically or more cost-effective for a broad range of patients, but frequently a key issue is determining which specific types of patients would benefit most from it. Related terms include cost–benefit analysis, technology assessment, and evidence-based medicine, although the latter concepts do not ordinarily take costs into account.”

Assessment

For related financial, economics, managed-care, insurance, health information technology and security, and health administrative terms and definitions of modernity, visit: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated. How do you define this term, and is its’ very definition evolving?

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Hospitals: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details      

Filed under: Glossary Terms, Health Economics, Quality Initiatives, Recommended Books, Research & Development | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 24 Comments »