HYPOTHESIS: Defined

Posted on June 12, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

A hypothesis is one of the most fundamental tools in the process of inquiry, serving as the bridge between curiosity and systematic investigation. At its core, a hypothesis is a tentative explanation or prediction that a researcher proposes in response to an observed phenomenon. It is not a random guess but an informed statement grounded in prior knowledge, observation, or logical reasoning. The purpose of a hypothesis is to provide a clear direction for research by identifying what the investigator expects to find and how different factors might relate to one another. Without a hypothesis, research would lack focus, and the process of gathering and interpreting data would become aimless and disorganized.

A hypothesis is valuable because it transforms a broad question into a specific, testable claim. When a researcher notices something interesting—such as a pattern, a change, or a difference—they begin by asking why it might be happening. The hypothesis offers a possible answer to that question. For example, if a student observes that plants near a window grow faster than those in a darker corner, they might hypothesize that increased sunlight leads to faster growth. This statement is not only clear but also testable, meaning that an experiment can be designed to determine whether the prediction holds true. The ability to test a hypothesis is essential because it allows researchers to gather evidence that either supports or challenges their initial idea.

A strong hypothesis has several important characteristics. It must be specific, meaning it clearly identifies the variables involved and the expected relationship between them. It must also be measurable so that data can be collected in a meaningful way. Most importantly, a hypothesis must be falsifiable. This means that there must be a possible outcome that would show the hypothesis is incorrect. Falsifiability is crucial because it ensures that the hypothesis can be evaluated objectively rather than accepted as true without evidence. A statement that cannot be proven wrong is not a hypothesis but an opinion or belief, and it does not belong in scientific inquiry.

In many forms of research, especially in the sciences, hypotheses are divided into two main types: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis states that there is no relationship or effect between the variables being studied. It serves as the default assumption that researchers test against. The alternative hypothesis proposes that there is a relationship or effect. These paired statements help structure the research process by clarifying what the investigator is looking for and how the results will be interpreted. If the evidence contradicts the null hypothesis, the researcher may accept the alternative hypothesis as a more accurate explanation.

The process of forming a hypothesis is closely tied to the scientific method. After making an observation and reviewing existing information, the researcher develops a hypothesis that explains what they expect to happen. They then design an experiment or study to test the hypothesis, collect data, and analyze the results. Based on the findings, the hypothesis may be supported, rejected, or revised. Even when a hypothesis is not supported, it still contributes to knowledge by eliminating incorrect explanations and guiding future research in new directions. This iterative process is essential to scientific progress because it encourages continuous refinement of ideas.

A hypothesis also plays an important role beyond the sciences. In fields such as psychology, education, economics, and even everyday problem‑solving, hypotheses help people make predictions and test their assumptions. For instance, a teacher might hypothesize that students learn better when lessons include hands‑on activities. A business owner might hypothesize that offering discounts will increase customer traffic. In each case, the hypothesis provides a starting point for gathering evidence and making informed decisions.

Ultimately, a hypothesis is more than a statement; it is a tool for thinking. It encourages curiosity, clarity, and critical evaluation. By proposing a possible explanation and inviting scrutiny, a hypothesis pushes researchers to explore the world more deeply and systematically. Whether it is eventually supported or disproven, every hypothesis contributes to a broader understanding of how things work. In this way, hypotheses are essential building blocks of knowledge, guiding inquiry and shaping the development of theories that help explain the complexities of the world around us.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731

CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

FINANCE:Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors

INSURANCE:Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Dictionary of Health Economics and Finance

Dictionary of Health Information Technology and Security

Dictionary of Health Insurance and Managed Care

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

SURGERY: A Math Theory?

Posted on June 11, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

By Dr. Gary L. Bode; CPA MSA

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Surgery theory is a branch of topology that studies how one can systematically modify manifolds to understand their structure, classify them, or transform them into more manageable forms. At its core, surgery theory provides a procedure for cutting and pasting along embedded spheres to change the topology of a space in a controlled way. The central idea is that by removing a neighborhood of an embedded sphere and replacing it with another piece that has the same boundary, one can alter the manifold while preserving smoothness or topological coherence. This method has become one of the most powerful tools in high‑dimensional topology, particularly for dimensions five and above.

The basic move in surgery theory begins with an embedded sphere Sk inside an n-dimensional manifold Mn. One removes the product Sk×Dn−k, which is a tubular neighborhood of the sphere, and glues in Dk+1×Sn−k−1 along their common boundary. This operation is called a surgery step. The replacement piece has the same boundary as the removed piece, ensuring that the resulting space is again a manifold. Although this sounds like a simple geometric maneuver, its consequences for the topology of the manifold can be profound. Surgery can change homotopy groups, modify intersection forms, or even alter the manifold’s differentiable structure.

One of the major achievements of surgery theory is its role in the classification of manifolds. In high dimensions, manifolds are often classified up to homotopy equivalence, and surgery theory provides a method to refine this classification to homeomorphism or diffeomorphism. The process typically begins with a manifold that is homotopy equivalent to a desired model. Through a sequence of surgeries, one attempts to eliminate obstructions to improving this equivalence into an actual homeomorphism. These obstructions live in algebraic objects such as L‑groups, which encode quadratic forms over group rings. The appearance of such algebraic structures is one of the striking features of surgery theory: it translates geometric problems into algebraic ones, allowing classification questions to be attacked with algebraic tools.

Another important application is the study of cobordism. Two manifolds are cobordant if they form the boundary of a higher‑dimensional manifold. Surgery theory provides a systematic way to modify a cobordism to achieve desirable properties, such as making a map between manifolds into a homotopy equivalence. This is central to the proof of the h‑cobordism theorem, which in turn underlies the classification of simply connected manifolds in high dimensions. The h‑cobordism theorem states that if a cobordism between simply connected manifolds has certain homotopy properties, then it is actually a product. Surgery theory provides the mechanism for adjusting the cobordism so that these homotopy conditions are satisfied.

Surgery theory also plays a role in understanding exotic smooth structures. In dimensions greater than four, surgery can often be used to show that manifolds have unique smooth structures. However, in dimension four, the situation becomes dramatically more complicated. While surgery theory still provides insights, it cannot fully resolve the classification of smooth structures in this dimension. This limitation highlights both the power and the boundaries of the method.

Overall, surgery theory is a unifying framework that connects geometry, algebra, and topology. It provides a toolkit for transforming manifolds, resolving classification problems, and revealing deep structural relationships. Its influence spans from the foundations of geometric topology to modern developments in manifold theory. If you want to explore a specific aspect next, you might look at L‑groups or the h‑cobordism theorem.

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

SCIENTIFIC METHOD: Defined

Posted on June 11, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

A Foundation of Modern Inquiry

The scientific method stands as one of humanity’s most powerful intellectual achievements, providing a systematic way to investigate natural phenomena, test ideas, and build reliable knowledge. Although often presented as a simple sequence of steps—observation, hypothesis, experimentation, and conclusion—the scientific method is far richer, more flexible, and more nuanced than this linear model suggests. It is both a philosophy and a practice, shaped by centuries of refinement, debate, and discovery. At its core, the scientific method is a disciplined approach to understanding the world by grounding explanations in evidence rather than intuition, tradition, or authority.

The process typically begins with observation, the careful noticing of patterns, anomalies, or questions that arise from the natural world. Observation is not passive; it requires curiosity, attention, and often specialized tools. A scientist might observe the behavior of a chemical reaction, the motion of a planet, or the spread of a disease. These observations lead to questions, which form the intellectual spark that drives scientific inquiry. A well‑formed scientific question is specific, measurable, and focused on understanding a relationship or mechanism.

From these questions emerges the hypothesis, a tentative explanation that can be tested. A hypothesis is not a guess but a reasoned proposition based on prior knowledge, logic, and available evidence. Crucially, a hypothesis must be falsifiable, meaning it can be proven wrong through observation or experiment. This requirement distinguishes scientific ideas from beliefs or opinions. A hypothesis such as “all swans are white” can be falsified by observing a single black swan; a claim that cannot be tested or potentially disproven does not belong to the realm of science.

Once a hypothesis is established, the next step is prediction. Predictions translate the hypothesis into specific, testable outcomes. If the hypothesis is correct, then certain results should follow under defined conditions. Predictions help guide the design of experiments and clarify what evidence would support or contradict the hypothesis.

Experimentation is the heart of the scientific method. An experiment is a controlled procedure designed to test the predictions derived from the hypothesis. Good experiments isolate variables, use appropriate controls, and rely on precise measurement. The goal is to determine whether the observed results align with the predicted outcomes. Experiments may be conducted in laboratories, in the field, or through computational models, depending on the discipline. Regardless of the setting, the emphasis is on reproducibility: other researchers should be able to repeat the experiment and obtain similar results.

After data are collected, scientists engage in analysis, interpreting the results to determine whether they support or refute the hypothesis. This stage often involves statistical methods to assess the reliability and significance of the findings. A single experiment rarely provides definitive proof; instead, it contributes to a growing body of evidence. If the results contradict the hypothesis, the scientist must revise or abandon it. If the results support the hypothesis, it gains credibility but is never considered absolutely proven. Scientific knowledge is always provisional, open to revision in light of new evidence.

The final step is communication, an essential but sometimes overlooked component of the scientific method. Scientists share their findings through publications, presentations, and peer review. Peer review subjects the research to scrutiny by other experts, helping ensure that methods are sound, conclusions are justified, and errors are identified. This communal aspect of science allows knowledge to accumulate, refine, and evolve over time.

***

***

Although the scientific method is often portrayed as a rigid sequence, in practice it is highly flexible. Scientists may move back and forth between steps, refine hypotheses mid‑experiment, or generate new questions from unexpected results. Serendipity—unexpected discoveries—has played a major role in scientific progress, from penicillin to cosmic microwave background radiation. The method is less a strict recipe and more a guiding framework that emphasizes evidence, logic, and transparency.

Historically, the scientific method emerged from a long tradition of philosophical inquiry. Ancient thinkers such as Aristotle emphasized observation and classification, while medieval scholars in the Islamic world advanced experimental techniques. The Scientific Revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries marked a turning point, as figures like Francis Bacon and Galileo Galilei championed empirical investigation and systematic experimentation. Over time, the method evolved to incorporate mathematical modeling, statistical reasoning, and technological innovation.

Today, the scientific method underpins virtually every scientific discipline, from physics and biology to psychology and environmental science. It has enabled breakthroughs that transformed human life: vaccines, electricity, computers, and countless other advancements trace their origins to systematic inquiry. Beyond its practical achievements, the scientific method embodies a deeper philosophical commitment: the belief that the natural world is understandable through careful study, and that knowledge should be grounded in evidence rather than authority.

In an era of rapid technological change and widespread misinformation, the principles of the scientific method remain as vital as ever. Its emphasis on skepticism, transparency, and reproducibility provides a safeguard against error and bias. By teaching and applying the scientific method, society cultivates critical thinking, nurtures innovation, and strengthens the foundation of informed decision‑making.

Ultimately, the scientific method is more than a tool for scientists; it is a way of thinking that encourages curiosity, humility, and a relentless pursuit of truth. It reminds us that knowledge is not static but continually refined through questioning, testing, and discovery. Through this process, humanity expands its understanding of the universe and its place within it.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731

CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

FINANCE:Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors

INSURANCE:Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Dictionary of Health Economics and Finance

Dictionary of Health Information Technology and Security

Dictionary of Health Insurance and Managed Care

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

CHAOS: Theory

Posted on June 2, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

Chaos theory is the study of how small, almost invisible changes in a system can lead to massive, unpredictable outcomes. At its core, chaos theory shows that the world is far less orderly than it appears, even in systems governed by strict rules. Although it sounds abstract, chaos theory shapes how we understand weather patterns, ecosystems, financial markets, and even human behavior. Its central insight is simple but profound: sensitivity to initial conditions—often illustrated through the famous butterfly effect—means that perfect prediction is impossible in many real‑world systems.

Chaos theory emerged in the mid‑20th century, but it gained momentum when meteorologist Edward Lorenz discovered that tiny rounding differences in his weather model produced dramatically different forecasts. This sensitivity revealed that deterministic systems—those governed by fixed rules—could still behave unpredictably. Lorenz’s work showed that even if we know the rules of a system, we may never be able to predict its long‑term behavior with precision. This insight reshaped meteorology and laid the foundation for modern nonlinear science.

A key concept in chaos theory is the butterfly effect, the idea that a minuscule event, like the flap of a butterfly’s wings, could influence large‑scale outcomes such as a storm weeks later. While the metaphor is poetic, the underlying principle is mathematical: small variations in initial conditions grow exponentially over time. This exponential divergence is what makes chaotic systems so difficult to forecast. Weather is the classic example, but the same principle applies to population dynamics, chemical reactions, and even the spread of ideas.

Another essential idea is the presence of strange attractors. In many chaotic systems, the system’s behavior never repeats exactly, yet it still follows a recognizable pattern. Lorenz’s attractor—an iconic butterfly‑shaped figure—shows how a system can be both structured and unpredictable. Strange attractors reveal that chaos is not randomness; it is patterned unpredictability. The system is constrained, but its path within those constraints is endlessly varied.

Chaos theory also highlights the importance of nonlinear systems. In linear systems, outputs are proportional to inputs. Nonlinear systems, by contrast, amplify or dampen changes in ways that are not straightforward. Most natural systems are nonlinear, which is why chaos theory has become so influential across scientific fields. Nonlinearity allows for feedback loops, tipping points, and emergent behavior—phenomena that cannot be captured by simple equations.

One of the most fascinating implications of chaos theory is its challenge to traditional ideas of prediction and control. For centuries, science operated under the assumption that with enough information, the future could be forecast with precision. Chaos theory undermines this assumption. It shows that uncertainty is not always the result of ignorance; sometimes it is built into the structure of the system itself. This realization has philosophical weight, suggesting that the universe is not a perfectly predictable machine but a dynamic interplay of order and disorder.

Chaos theory also offers a new way to think about creativity and complexity. Systems that exhibit chaotic behavior often generate intricate patterns, from the branching of trees to the rhythms of the human heart. These patterns emerge not from randomness but from the interplay of simple rules and nonlinear interactions. In this sense, chaos theory bridges the gap between mathematics and the natural world, revealing hidden structures in what once seemed like noise.

In everyday life, chaos theory helps explain why long‑term predictions—whether in weather, economics, or human behavior—are so unreliable. It reminds us that small actions can have far‑reaching consequences, and that systems we assume to be stable may be more fragile than they appear. At the same time, it shows that unpredictability does not mean disorder; even chaotic systems have underlying patterns that can be studied and understood.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

MIRROR TEST: Study of Self‑Awareness

Posted on May 27, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

The mirror test is one of the most influential methods used to explore self‑awareness in humans and other animals. Developed in 1970 by psychologist Gordon Gallup Jr., the test aims to determine whether an individual can recognize its own reflection as an image of itself rather than another being. Although the procedure is simple, the implications are profound, touching on questions about consciousness, identity, and the evolution of cognition.

The test typically involves placing a visible mark on an animal’s body in a location it cannot see without a mirror, such as the forehead. The animal is then given access to a mirror. If it uses the reflection to investigate or touch the mark on its own body, this behavior is interpreted as evidence of self-recognition. The logic behind this conclusion is that the animal must understand that the image in the mirror corresponds to its own body, not to another creature. This ability is considered a key component of self-awareness, suggesting the presence of an internal sense of identity.

Human children usually begin to pass the mirror test between 18 and 24 months of age. Before this developmental stage, infants may smile at or reach toward the reflection as if interacting with another child. When they eventually touch the mark on their own face after seeing it in the mirror, it signals a cognitive shift: they have formed a mental model of themselves as a distinct physical being. This milestone is often used in developmental psychology to track the emergence of self-concept.

A small but notable group of nonhuman species has also passed the mirror test. These include great apes such as chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans, as well as dolphins, elephants, and certain bird species like magpies. The diversity of these animals suggests that self-recognition may evolve in different evolutionary contexts. For example, dolphins and elephants live in complex social environments where understanding others—and oneself—may offer survival advantages. Magpies, despite being evolutionarily distant from mammals, display advanced problem‑solving abilities that may support similar cognitive processes.

However, passing the mirror test does not necessarily imply that an animal possesses human‑like consciousness. Instead, it indicates that the animal has achieved a specific form of self-awareness related to bodily recognition. Self-awareness itself is a layered concept that includes emotional awareness, social understanding, and introspection. The mirror test captures only one dimension of this broader cognitive landscape.

The test has also faced significant criticism. One major limitation is that it relies heavily on vision. Species that navigate the world primarily through smell, sound, or touch may not find mirrors meaningful. Dogs, for instance, typically fail the mirror test, but this does not mean they lack self-awareness. Research shows that dogs respond differently to their own scent compared to the scent of other dogs, suggesting a form of olfactory self-recognition that the mirror test cannot measure. Similarly, animals that avoid direct eye contact, such as some gorillas, may not engage with mirrors even if they are capable of recognizing themselves.

Another critique is that the mirror test may underestimate intelligence in species that do not naturally interact with reflective surfaces. An animal might understand the mirror image but lack the motivation to investigate the mark. Some species may also interpret the mirror as a social threat or simply ignore it. These behavioral differences complicate the interpretation of test results and highlight the need for multiple methods to assess self-awareness.

Despite its limitations, the mirror test remains a landmark in the study of cognition. It challenges assumptions about the uniqueness of human consciousness and encourages researchers to explore the minds of other species with greater nuance. The test also inspires new approaches to studying self-awareness, such as scent‑based tests for dogs or problem‑solving tasks that reveal how animals perceive themselves in relation to their environment.

Ultimately, the mirror test invites us to reconsider our place in the natural world. If other animals can recognize themselves, then the boundary between human and nonhuman minds becomes less rigid. This realization encourages a deeper appreciation for the cognitive richness of the animal kingdom and raises important ethical questions about how we treat other species. The mirror test, simple as it is, opens a window into the complex and varied ways that minds can understand themselves.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

HOBSON’S CHOICE: The Illusion of Free Choice

Posted on January 16, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

***

***

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd

The phrase “Hobson’s choice” refers to a situation where a person is offered only one option disguised as a free choice. It’s the classic “take it or leave it” scenario—where declining the offer results in no alternative, making the choice effectively compulsory. Though it may sound paradoxical, Hobson’s choice is a powerful concept that reveals much about human decision-making, power dynamics, and the illusion of autonomy.

The term originates from Thomas Hobson, a 16th-century livery stable owner in Cambridge, England. Hobson rented horses to university students and townsfolk, but to prevent his best horses from being overused, he implemented a strict rotation system. Customers could only take the horse nearest the stable door—or none at all. While it appeared that Hobson was offering a choice, in reality, there was no real alternative. This practice became so well-known that “Hobson’s choice” entered the English lexicon as a metaphor for constrained decision-making.

In modern contexts, Hobson’s choice appears in various forms. In business, a company might present a single product or service as if it were part of a broader selection. In politics, voters may feel they are choosing between candidates, but if all options represent similar policies or ideologies, the choice is superficial. Even in personal relationships or workplace settings, individuals may be given decisions that seem voluntary but are shaped by pressure, necessity, or lack of alternatives.

Philosophically, Hobson’s choice challenges the notion of free will. It forces us to ask: Is a decision truly free if the consequences of refusal are unacceptable? This dilemma is particularly relevant in ethical debates, such as informed consent in medicine or coercion in legal contracts. When someone is pressured to accept terms under duress or limited options, the legitimacy of their consent becomes questionable.

Moreover, Hobson’s choice is often used rhetorically to justify decisions that limit others’ autonomy. For example, a government might present a controversial policy as the only viable solution to a crisis, framing dissent as irresponsible. In such cases, the illusion of choice masks the exercise of power and control.

Despite its negative connotations, Hobson’s choice can also serve as a tool for efficiency and fairness. Hobson’s original intent was to protect his horses and ensure equal access for all customers. In systems where resources are limited, offering a single standardized option may prevent exploitation or favoritism.

In conclusion, Hobson’s choice is more than a historical anecdote—it’s a lens through which we can examine the boundaries of freedom, the ethics of decision-making, and the subtle ways power operates in everyday life. Whether in politics, business, or personal relationships, recognizing Hobson’s choice helps us navigate the complex terrain between autonomy and constraint.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: ME-P Editor Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: Ask a Doctor, Ethics, Experts Invited, Glossary Terms, iMBA, Inc., LifeStyle | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »