RMDs: Required Minimum Distributions

Posted on June 13, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

By Gary L. Bode; CPA MSA

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Purpose, Mechanics and Planning Implications

Required Minimum Distributions—commonly known as RMDs—represent one of the most important turning points in retirement planning. After decades of contributing to tax‑advantaged accounts such as traditional IRAs and employer‑sponsored plans like 401(k)s, individuals eventually reach a stage where the government requires them to begin withdrawing a portion of those savings each year. Understanding RMDs is essential because they influence tax liability, investment strategy, and the pace at which retirement assets are used.

At their core, RMDs exist because tax‑deferred accounts were never intended to shelter money from taxation indefinitely. Contributions to traditional retirement accounts are often made with pre‑tax dollars, and investment growth inside the account is not taxed annually. The government allows this deferral to encourage saving, but it also expects to collect taxes eventually. RMDs ensure that the IRS receives its share by forcing withdrawals once an individual reaches a certain age. This age has shifted over time due to legislative changes, but the underlying principle remains the same: tax‑deferred money cannot remain untouched forever.

The calculation of an RMD is straightforward in concept but requires attention to detail. Each year, the required amount is determined by dividing the account balance at the end of the previous year by a life‑expectancy factor published by the IRS. This factor reflects statistical estimates of how long a person at a given age is expected to live. As a result, RMDs generally increase over time. Early in retirement, the divisor is large, producing smaller withdrawals. As life expectancy shortens with age, the divisor shrinks, and the required withdrawal becomes a larger percentage of the account. This structure ensures that tax‑deferred savings are gradually drawn down over a retiree’s lifetime.

RMDs apply to a variety of accounts, including traditional IRAs, SEP IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, and most employer‑sponsored plans. Roth IRAs, however, are exempt during the owner’s lifetime because contributions to those accounts are made with after‑tax dollars. This distinction creates strategic opportunities for retirees who want to manage their tax exposure. For example, some individuals choose to convert portions of their traditional IRA to a Roth IRA before reaching RMD age. While conversions trigger taxes in the year they occur, they can reduce future RMDs and create a pool of tax‑free assets that can grow without mandatory withdrawals.

One of the most significant implications of RMDs is their effect on taxable income. Because RMDs must be withdrawn and are treated as ordinary income, they can push retirees into higher tax brackets, increase Medicare premiums, or affect the taxation of Social Security benefits. This makes proactive planning essential. Retirees who wait until RMDs begin may find themselves forced to withdraw more than they need, resulting in avoidable tax consequences. By contrast, those who begin drawing down accounts earlier—either through voluntary withdrawals or Roth conversions—may smooth their taxable income over time and reduce the impact of large mandatory withdrawals later.

Another important aspect of RMDs is the penalty for failing to take them. Historically, the penalty was one of the steepest in the tax code: 50% of the amount that should have been withdrawn but wasn’t. While recent legislation has reduced this penalty, it remains substantial enough to warrant careful attention. Retirees must track deadlines, understand which accounts require withdrawals, and ensure that the correct amounts are taken each year. Some choose to consolidate accounts to simplify the process, while others rely on financial institutions to calculate and distribute the required amounts automatically.

RMDs also influence investment strategy. Because withdrawals are mandatory, retirees must ensure that their portfolios maintain sufficient liquidity. This does not mean abandoning long‑term investments, but it does require thoughtful allocation. Some retirees adopt a “bucket strategy,” keeping a portion of assets in cash or short‑term instruments to meet RMDs while allowing the remainder to stay invested for growth. Others adjust their withdrawal timing within the year to align with market conditions or personal cash‑flow needs.

Beyond the individual, RMDs have implications for heirs. Beneficiaries who inherit retirement accounts are subject to their own distribution rules, which have also evolved over time. In many cases, heirs must withdraw the entire balance within a set number of years, which can create significant tax burdens if not planned for. Understanding how RMDs interact with estate planning can help retirees structure their assets in ways that minimize tax consequences for the next generation.

In summary, RMDs are more than a bureaucratic requirement—they are a central feature of the retirement landscape, shaping tax outcomes, investment decisions, and long‑term financial strategy. By understanding how they work and planning ahead, retirees can manage their distributions in ways that support their goals, preserve their savings, and avoid unnecessary penalties. While the rules can be complex, the underlying purpose is simple: to ensure that tax‑deferred savings eventually enter the taxable economy. For anyone approaching retirement age, taking the time to understand RMDs is not just prudent—it is essential.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731

CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900

ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

FINANCE:Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors

INSURANCE:Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Dictionary of Health Economics and Finance

Dictionary of Health Information Technology and Security

Dictionary of Health Insurance and Managed Care

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

SURGERY: A Math Theory?

Posted on June 11, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

By Dr. Gary L. Bode; CPA MSA

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Surgery theory is a branch of topology that studies how one can systematically modify manifolds to understand their structure, classify them, or transform them into more manageable forms. At its core, surgery theory provides a procedure for cutting and pasting along embedded spheres to change the topology of a space in a controlled way. The central idea is that by removing a neighborhood of an embedded sphere and replacing it with another piece that has the same boundary, one can alter the manifold while preserving smoothness or topological coherence. This method has become one of the most powerful tools in high‑dimensional topology, particularly for dimensions five and above.

The basic move in surgery theory begins with an embedded sphere Sk inside an n-dimensional manifold Mn. One removes the product Sk×Dn−k, which is a tubular neighborhood of the sphere, and glues in Dk+1×Sn−k−1 along their common boundary. This operation is called a surgery step. The replacement piece has the same boundary as the removed piece, ensuring that the resulting space is again a manifold. Although this sounds like a simple geometric maneuver, its consequences for the topology of the manifold can be profound. Surgery can change homotopy groups, modify intersection forms, or even alter the manifold’s differentiable structure.

One of the major achievements of surgery theory is its role in the classification of manifolds. In high dimensions, manifolds are often classified up to homotopy equivalence, and surgery theory provides a method to refine this classification to homeomorphism or diffeomorphism. The process typically begins with a manifold that is homotopy equivalent to a desired model. Through a sequence of surgeries, one attempts to eliminate obstructions to improving this equivalence into an actual homeomorphism. These obstructions live in algebraic objects such as L‑groups, which encode quadratic forms over group rings. The appearance of such algebraic structures is one of the striking features of surgery theory: it translates geometric problems into algebraic ones, allowing classification questions to be attacked with algebraic tools.

Another important application is the study of cobordism. Two manifolds are cobordant if they form the boundary of a higher‑dimensional manifold. Surgery theory provides a systematic way to modify a cobordism to achieve desirable properties, such as making a map between manifolds into a homotopy equivalence. This is central to the proof of the h‑cobordism theorem, which in turn underlies the classification of simply connected manifolds in high dimensions. The h‑cobordism theorem states that if a cobordism between simply connected manifolds has certain homotopy properties, then it is actually a product. Surgery theory provides the mechanism for adjusting the cobordism so that these homotopy conditions are satisfied.

Surgery theory also plays a role in understanding exotic smooth structures. In dimensions greater than four, surgery can often be used to show that manifolds have unique smooth structures. However, in dimension four, the situation becomes dramatically more complicated. While surgery theory still provides insights, it cannot fully resolve the classification of smooth structures in this dimension. This limitation highlights both the power and the boundaries of the method.

Overall, surgery theory is a unifying framework that connects geometry, algebra, and topology. It provides a toolkit for transforming manifolds, resolving classification problems, and revealing deep structural relationships. Its influence spans from the foundations of geometric topology to modern developments in manifold theory. If you want to explore a specific aspect next, you might look at L‑groups or the h‑cobordism theorem.

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

RETIREMENT PLAN Vesting

Posted on May 25, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

By Dr. Gary L. Bode; CPA MSA

SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

***

***

Understanding Ownership, Security and Long‑Term Planning

Retirement vesting is one of the most important yet often misunderstood components of employer‑sponsored retirement plans. At its core, vesting determines when an employee gains full ownership of employer‑provided retirement benefits. While employees always own the money they personally contribute, the employer’s contributions—whether through matching, profit‑sharing, or pension funding—become the employee’s property only after certain conditions are met. Understanding vesting is essential for making informed career decisions, evaluating job offers, and planning long‑term financial security.

The Meaning and Purpose of Vesting

Vesting exists to balance two interests: the employee’s need for retirement security and the employer’s desire to retain talent. When an employer contributes to a retirement plan, it is making a long‑term investment in its workforce. Vesting schedules encourage employees to remain with the organization long enough for the employer to justify that investment. At the same time, vesting ensures that employees who stay for a reasonable period ultimately receive the benefits promised to them.

The concept is straightforward: once an employee becomes fully vested, they have a non‑forfeitable right to the employer’s contributions. If they leave the company before reaching full vesting, they may lose some or all of those contributions. This makes vesting a powerful tool for both retention and financial planning.

Types of Vesting Schedules

Most retirement plans use one of three vesting structures. Each structure affects how quickly an employee gains ownership of employer contributions.

1. Cliff Vesting

Cliff vesting grants employees 0% ownership until a specific date, at which point they become 100% vested all at once. For example, a plan may require three years of service before vesting occurs. If an employee leaves after two years and eleven months, they receive none of the employer contributions. If they stay until the three‑year mark, they receive all of them.

Cliff vesting is simple and predictable, but it can feel unforgiving to employees who leave shortly before the vesting date. Employers often use it to strongly encourage retention during the early years of employment.

2. Graded Vesting

Graded vesting provides ownership gradually over time. A common schedule might vest employees at 20% per year over five years. This structure offers a middle ground: employees gain partial ownership early on, but full vesting still requires a longer commitment.

Graded vesting is often perceived as fairer because employees retain at least some employer contributions even if they leave before full vesting. It also aligns well with modern workforce mobility, where employees may change jobs more frequently.

3. Immediate Vesting

Immediate vesting gives employees full ownership of employer contributions as soon as they are made. This structure is less common because it provides no retention incentive, but some employers use it to remain competitive in talent‑driven industries or to simplify plan administration.

Vesting in Defined Contribution vs. Defined Benefit Plans

Vesting applies differently depending on the type of retirement plan.

Defined Contribution Plans

In plans such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and 457(b)s, vesting applies to employer contributions only. Employee contributions are always fully vested. The vesting schedule determines how much of the employer match or profit‑sharing an employee keeps when leaving the company.

Defined Benefit Plans

In traditional pensions, vesting determines when an employee becomes entitled to a future monthly benefit. Once vested, the employee has a legal right to receive the pension at retirement age, even if they leave the company long before then.

Why Vesting Matters for Employees

Vesting affects several major aspects of financial and career planning.

1. Job Mobility

Employees considering a job change must weigh the value of unvested benefits. Leaving a job even a few months early could mean forfeiting thousands of dollars in employer contributions. Understanding vesting timelines helps employees make informed decisions about when to transition.

2. Total Compensation

Employer retirement contributions are part of total compensation, but their value depends on vesting. A job with a generous match but a long vesting schedule may be less attractive than one with a smaller match but faster vesting.

3. Long‑Term Wealth Building

Vested employer contributions can significantly increase retirement savings over time. Losing unvested funds can delay financial goals, reduce compound growth, and require higher personal contributions to make up the difference.

***

***

Vesting and Employee Retention

From the employer’s perspective, vesting is a strategic tool. A well‑designed vesting schedule encourages employees to stay long enough for the organization to recoup the cost of hiring, training, and development. It also helps employers compete for talent by offering meaningful long‑term benefits.

However, overly restrictive vesting schedules can backfire. In a competitive labor market, employees may avoid companies with long cliffs or slow vesting. As a result, many employers have shifted toward more flexible or accelerated vesting structures to attract and retain skilled workers.

The Psychological Dimension of Vesting

Beyond financial implications, vesting influences how employees perceive their relationship with an employer. A fair vesting schedule can foster loyalty, trust, and a sense of shared investment. Conversely, a schedule that feels punitive may undermine morale or encourage employees to leave once they become fully vested.

Vesting also shapes how employees think about their future. Knowing that retirement benefits are accumulating—and that they will eventually own them—can create a sense of stability and long‑term purpose.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

Like, Refer and Subscribe

***

Filed under: iMBA, Inc. | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING: Terminology and Definitions

Posted on April 15, 2026 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

By Gary Bode CPA MSA

By ME-P Staff Reporters

Cost and Management Accounting Terms Defined with some Examples and Links for more information.

Activity cost – Cost associated with different types, or levels of activities. Unit level, batch level, product level, customer level and business level. See MAAW’s Textbook Chapter 7.

Appraisal Cost – The cost of testing and inspecting both the materials and finished products. See Quality Cost.

Asset – An unexpired cost. An object with expected future benefits. Inventory, book value or undepreciated cost of buildings and equipment.

Average Cost – Usually refers to the mean of a category of costs. The unit cost of a product that flows through a production process.

Batch Level Cost – Cost of an activity that is required or performed each time a batch of products or services is produced. Setting up the production line to produce a batch of product X. Also inspecting the batch, moving the batch etc. See MAAW’s Textbook Chapter 7.

Business (or facility) Level or Sustaining Cost – Cost associated with maintaining the business and facilities. Maintenance, housekeeping, and administrative functions.

By-Products – By-products are a sub-category of joint products that have relatively insignificant sales values as a proportion of the value of the entire group from which they are derived. Typically none of the joint cost is assigned to the by-products. See Joint Products.

Capacity Related Cost – Cost that are based on the amount acquired rather than the amount used. Can be direct or indirect, but are fixed in the short run. Depreciation on buildings and equipment.

Capacity Related Resource – Resources purchased in advance. Committed resources. Resources that generate cost based on the amount acquired rather than the amount used. Buildings and equipment.

Cost – Sacrifice. The price of any resource.

Cost Accumulation Method – Cost accumulation refers to the manner in which costs are collected and identified with specific customers, jobs, batches, orders, departments and processes. There are four accumulation methods including Job Order, Process, Backflush, and Hybrid methods. See MAAW’s Textbook Chapter 2.

Cost Flow Assumption – A cost flow assumption refers to how costs flow through the inventory accounts, not the flow of work or products on a production line. The various types of cost flow assumptions include: Specific identification (e.g., by job), first in, first out, last in, first out and weighted average. MAAW’s Textbook Chapter 2.

Cost Object – Any segment or element for which cost information is desired. See the Gordon & Loeb summary for more. A product, service, project, activity, department, division, or customer, etc.

Customer Level Cost – Cost of an activity that is required or performed to support a specific customer.Sales calls, installation of a product and technical support. See MAAW’s Textbook Chapter 7.

Direct Cost – Cost used by a single cost object. Note that the definition of a cost as direct or indirect changes if the cost object changes. See the Gordon & Loeb summary for more. A cost that would be eliminated if the cost object is eliminated. A supervisor’s salary is a direct cost to the production department he or she is in charge of or managing.

Discretionary Cost – Can be increased or decreased at the discretion of the decision maker. Not committed. Advertising, employee training, research and development, preventive maintenance.

Expense – An expired cost. See above. Cost of goods sold.

Expired Cost – A cost associated with an object who’s benefits have been obtained or recorded.An expense such as cost of goods sold.

Fixed Cost – A cost that does not change or vary with changes in the activity level. Capacity related cost. Straight line depreciation, a supervisor’s salary, property taxes.

Flexible Cost – Cost of flexible resources. Always direct costs. Cost that vary in proportion to the amount used. Direct material costs, i.e., cost of materials or components that go into or become the product.

Flexible Resource– Resources that generate cost in proportion to the amount used. Direct material.

Full Cost – Direct plus indirect cost. Variable plus a share of the fixed costs.GAAP product costs is considered full costs although this is misleading because it does not include non-manufacturing costs.

Future Cost – Estimated costs. Budgeted costs.

Historical Cost – Recorded costs. Sometimes referred to as actual cost, but this is misleading because the cost recorded depends on the accounting alternative chosen.Any costs that are recorded such as labor costs, materials costs, depreciation etc. For example, accounting alternatives for depreciation include straight line and several accelerated methods.

Incremental Cost – Cost of one more item, unit or customer. Cost of one more passenger on an airline.

Implicit Cost – Unstated and unrecorded cost. Opportunity costs.

Indirect Cost – Cost that is common or shared by more than one cost object. (See the Gordon & Loeb summary for more). A production supervisor’s salary is an indirect cost to the products produced within his or her department.

Inventory Cost – See Product costs.

Inventory Valuation Mehod – Inventory valuation refers to how product costs are assigned to the inventory. Note that inventory valuation refers to book value, not market value. Inventory valuation methods include throughput costing, direct costing, full absorption costing, and activity base costing. MAAW’s Textbook Chapter 2.

Joint Costs – Joint costs refers to the costs associated with producing a group of joint products prior to the point of separation. The cost associated with a hog prior to the time it becomes various products. See MAAW’s Chapter 6 Appendix.

Joint Products – Joint products refers to a group of products that are produced simultaneously by a common process. The products obtained from a hog such as the chops, ham, and bacon are joint products.

Lean Company and Lean Enterprise – See Concepts and Terms associated with Lean

Life cycle Cost – Cost associated with the various stages of a product’s life cycle. (See MAAW’s Product Life Cycle Topic.) The life cycle cost of a product include:

1. Development and design.
2. Introduction.
3. Production.
4. Distribution.
5. Post sales service.
6. Product take back.
7. Abandonment.

Long Run – A period where a decision maker can increase or decrease capacity. See short run.

Long Run Cost – These can be flexible or capacity related according to ABKY. Depreciation on plant and equipment.

Management Accounting – See Martin, J. R. Not dated. Definition of management accounting. Management And Accounting Web.  ArtSumDefinitionOfManagementAcc

Manufacturing Cost – Cost associated with the production of products. Factory costs. These are unexpired costs (assets) until the products are sold, then are charged off as expense, i.e., cost of goods sold. Includes direct material, direct labor (direct manufacturing costs) and indirect manufacturing costs also referred to as factory overhead and factory burden.

Matching Concept – The idea of bringing cost and benefits together on the income statement in the same time period. Accrual accounting where benefits (revenues) are matched with the costs (expenses) associated with generating the benefits.

Non-Manufacturing Cost – Cost not associated with the production of products, but with some other function such as administration or distribution. Treated as period costs by GAAP.Distribution, selling, marketing, customer service, research and development.

Opportunity Cost – Benefit foregone by not accepting or pursuing the next best alternative. The income or interest on an alternative investment. The opportunity cost of owning anything is what you could have obtained with the money.

Period Cost – Cost that are expensed in the period in which incurred. Non-manufacturing costs according to GAAP.

Prevention and Appraisal Cost – Prevention costs include the costs of planning and designing the production process to ensure conformance. See Quality Cost.

Product Cost – Costs associated with producing a product that are capitalized in the inventory, i.e., become assets until the products are sold. Direct manufacturing costs such as direct materials and direct labor, as well as indirect manufacturing costs usually referred to as factory overhead.

Product Level Cost – Cost of an activity that is required or performed to support a specific product.Product engineering. See MAAW’s Textbook Chapter 7.

Quality Costs – Cost associated with prevention and appraisal, and internal and external failure of products or services. See the Morse Summary.

Relevant Cost – Cost that will be different when two or more alternatives are involved. Also called differential cost. The cost that will be different if a product is dropped. See the ABKY Chatper 6 Summary.

Short Run – ABKY define this as the time period where a decision maker cannot adjust capacity. Usually thought of as a year in accounting, but this is just a ball park number and depends on the type of resource involved. The short run for an inter-state highway, or factory building is longer than a year and for a resource like fork lift trucks, it would be much shorter than a year.

Short Run Cost – ABKY define these as flexible costs. Direct material.

Sunk Cost – Sunk costs are costs that are irrevocable, or unavoidable and therefore not relevant. The amount paid down on a recently acquired machine is a sunk costs and is not relevant to the decision to replace the machine. See the ABKY Chatper 6 Summary.

Unexpired Cost – An asset. Inventory until sold, buildings, equipment.

Unit Level Cost – Cost of an activity that is required or performed each time a unit of product or service is produced or provided. Direct material required for a unit of product. See MAAW’s Textbook Chapter 7.

Variable Cost – A cost that changes or varies with changes in the activity level. Direct material.

EDUCATION: Books

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Refer and Subscribe

***

***

Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, Book Reviews, Experts Invited, Glossary Terms, Taxation | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »