What’s Old … is New Again?
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™
Asset allocation policies, incorporating the risk/return fundamental equation, have traditionally been classified under the following approaches: Principal Stability and Income, Income, Income-Oriented, Balanced, Growth, and Aggressive Growth.
Traditional Concepts
In all forms of traditional asset allocation and diversification policy approaches, the physician-investor is presumed to diversify within the chosen asset class in order to reduce the potential for specific or unsystematic risk.
Principal stability and income approach
Objective: Income, liquidity, and stability of principal.
Investment: Shorter-term fixed income securities with a large concentration in money market exposure to enhance liquidity and price stability. Accounts tend to maintain cash equivalent reserve balance of 30–50% of the portfolio.
Income approach
Objective: Maximum income.
Investment: 100% fixed income exposure.
Income portfolios arise from the traditional notion that an investor should spend only income and reinvest capital gains. Sometimes this is a legal requirement, as in a trust that has an income beneficiary distinct from the principal beneficiary.
Income-oriented approach
Objective: Income and some capital growth.
Investment: Accounts tend to maintain 15–35% in equity investments; balance of investment in fixed income.
Income and growth approach
Objective: Capital growth and income using a balanced approach to limit volatility.
Investment: Accounts tend to maintain 45–65% equity exposure; balance of investment in fixed income.
Income and growth portfolio policies generally refer to both the fixed income and equity portions of the portfolios. Because of the income bias, the overall stock portion of the portfolio will usually have a dividend yield greater than the market yield. This method allows the portfolio manager to invest in some no- or low-dividend yielding issues.
Growth approach
Objective: Capital growth with income as a secondary objective.
Investment: Accounts tend to maintain between 65%–85% equity exposure; balance of investment in fixed income, usually cash reserves.
Aggressive growth approach
Objective: Long-term capital growth.
Investment: Accounts maintain 100% equity exposure. Exposure to variety of equity types normal (small capitalization, international, emerging markets, etc).
Assessment Of course, the above is much more accurate during stable economic times, than it is today; don’t you think? Are newer concepts required today … or is past … prologue.
Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/new-wave-thoughts-on-investing/
Conclusion
And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated.
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm
Get our Widget: Get this widget!
Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:
Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759
Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790
Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421
Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com
Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com
Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com
Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Filed under: Accounting, Estate Planning, Ethics, Financial Planning, Funding Basics, iMBA, Inc., Insurance Matters, Investing, Portfolio Management, Practice Worth, Professional Liability, Recommended Books, Retirement and Benefits, Risk Management, Sponsors, Taxation | Tagged: Aggressive Growth, asset allocation, Balanced, diversification, Growth, Income, Income-Oriented, Principal Stability |
















Arnott: T-bonds Beat Stocks Over Past 40 Years
The recent bear market has overturned a lot of assumptions. Now one researcher is questioning the most basic: that investors in stocks come out ahead in the long run.
Link: http://www.fa-mag.com/fa-news/4031-arnott-t-bonds-beat-stocks-over-past-40-years.html
From Financial Advisor magazine
Submitted by Rex
April 3, 2009
LikeLike
Dr. Marcinko,
Interesting post. And, some indeed say that the dollar’s days as a reserve currency are coming to an end, and as a result, traditional asset allocation won’t deliver historic returns.
http://www.fa-mag.com/online-extras/4610-asset-allocation-is-dead.html
What do you think?
Douglas
LikeLike
A Bad Decade for Investing
I just read an article citing one financial advisor who said that “investor portfolios were torpedoed by over- diversification and unquestioning acceptance of the EMH”.
Q: So, what’s a doctor to do if the FA’s can’t get it right?
A: DIY and read the ME-P, and related books and texts.
Dr. Clark
LikeLike