Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds.
THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
By Staff Reporters
SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
***
***
Equity market neutral strategies seek to eliminate the risks of the equity market by holding up to 100% of net assets in long equity positions and up to 100% of net assets in short equity positions. These strategies attempt to exploit differences in stock prices by being long and short in stocks within the same sector, industry, market capitalization, etc. If successful, these strategies should generate returns independent of the equity market.
Equity market neutral portfolios have two key sources of return: 1) the Treasury Bill return (the interest on proceeds from short sales held in cash as collateral), and 2) the difference (the “spread”) between the return on the long positions and the return on the short positions. Stock picking, rather than broad market moves, should drive most of a market-neutral strategy’s total return (save for any return from the 100% cash position).
CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource
Extended Equity Strategies attempt to provide better returns than possible with long-only investments
An example of an extended equity strategy is a 130/30 portfolio, which gets its designation from taking a 130% long position and a 30% short position. In practice, this would mean $100mm invested in stocks that are viewed as attractive.
Next, the manager would borrow and sell short $30mm of unattractive stocks. Then the manager uses the proceeds from the short sale to buy an additional $30mm of attractive stocks. This results in a portfolio that has 130% long and 30% short exposure to stocks, or “extended” exposure to equities relative to a long-only, 100% stock portfolio.
Note: It’s important to point out that here is the risk of theoretical unlimited amount of loss with short selling, (i.e. the price of the short-sold stocks increases; the long position can only go down to $0).
CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Subscribe Today!
Thank You
***
***
Share this:
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Financial Planning, Funding Basics, Glossary Terms, iMBA, Inc., Investing, Marcinko Associates | Tagged: DEI, diversity, equity, equity strategies, equity stratigies, extended equity strategies, extended equity strategy, iMBA, inclusion, Institute Medical Business Advisors, Investing, investing strategies, Marcinko, medical business advisors | Leave a comment »
The Leading Business Education Network for Doctors, Financial Advisors and Health Industry Consultants 