AMERICAN DREAM: Now Costs $3.4 Million?

By Staff Reporters

SPONSOR: http://www.MARCINKOASSOCIATES.com

***

The classic “American Dream” including two kids, a house, and car now costs more than most folks make in a lifetime. According to Investopedia.

READ HERE: https://www.investopedia.com/the-american-dream-now-costs-over-usd3-million-8409951

PHYSICIAN SPECIFIC ASSISTANCE AND RESOURCES: https://marcinkoassociates.com/financial-planning/

Comments Appreciated

Thank You

***

***

The American Dream is Slipping Away?

Is the American Dream slipping away?

By Rick Kahler CFP®

Is the American Dream slipping away? Yes, according to an article by David Leonhardt, The American Dream, Quantified at Last, published in the New York Times in December 2016.

Leonhardt cites research done for The Equality of Opportunity Project and reported as Trends in Absolute Income Mobility Since 1940. It concludes that the ability to attain the American Dream has fallen from 92% in 1940 to 50% today.

For me, this report raised a few questions

First, how do we define the American Dream?

Merriam-Webster calls it a “happy way of living that is thought of by many Americans as something that can be achieved by anyone in the U.S. especially by working hard and becoming successful.”

Wikipedia says it is “the set of ideals (democracy, rights, liberty, opportunity, and equality) in which freedom includes the opportunity for prosperity and success, and an upward social mobility for the family and children, achieved through hard work in a society with few barriers.”

James Truslow Adams, in his 1931 book The American Dream, defines it as life being “better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement.”

These definitions suggest the American Dream is every person having the opportunity through ingenuity and hard work to achieve financial and emotional well-being.

Interestingly, the study Leonhardt cites chose a definition from Lawrence Samuel’s 2012 book, The American Dream: A Cultural History: “the ideal that children have a higher standard of living than their parents.”

The study found that those born in 1940 had a 92% chance of earning more than their parents at age 30. Those born in 1950 had a 79% chance, in 1960 a 62% chance, in 1970 a 61% chance, and in 1980 a 50% chance.

Leonhardt calls this data “deeply alarming.” He says, “It’s a portrait of an economy that disappoints a huge number of people that have heard that they live in a country where life gets better, only to experience something quite different.” I am guessing the disappointment to which he refers is what most people experience as life getting worse.

Yet defining the American Dream as an economy where children perpetually make more money (adjusted for inflation and taxes) than their parents misses the mark. As an economy improves and matures, that’s not sustainable.

***

***

Indeed, our country is experiencing exponential decreases—decreases in those living in extreme poverty. We are actually experiencing substantial increases in those earning more. Research in 2016 by Stephen J. Rose found that from 1979 through 2014 the number of households becoming affluent (incomes were adjusted for inflation) increased eighteen times, from 0.1% of the population in 1979 to 1.8% in 2014. The upper middle class increased from 12.9% to 29.4%. This, of course, left significantly fewer people in the categories of middle class, lower middle class, and poor.

As more people increase their standard of living, it’s only logical that the relative income growth of future generations will decrease. At some point in time, enough is enough.

Instead of seeing the American Dream solely as out-earning our parents, it may be more useful to go back to the second part of James Truslow Adams’ definition: “It is not a dream of motor cars and high wages merely, but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position.”

Assessment

Once someone achieves financial, physical, and emotional well-being, earning more than one’s parents becomes immaterial.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

***

The Economic “American Dream”

On Income Earners

Join Our Mailing List

Understanding the Top 50 Percent

[By Anonymous Reader]

QUESTION: How much do you need to make to be in the top 50 percent of earners?

ANSWER: Just $36,055. Fall below that level and you are in the bottom half, along with about 68 million of your fellow taxpayers. All told, that group earned just 11.1 percent of the AGI reported on 2012 Federal returns.

Half of all taxpayers earn less than $35,055

If the top one percent where the decision makers live were to quit squeezing so hard, the rest of the population might be subject to paying more taxes.

The problem with the American Dream sold to the masses is that it is not achievable for them. Yet, they keep on voting for it. The biggest problem with voters is they do not have a solid grounding in economics.

Thus, they cannot judge economic policy in any rational way. If the voting public voted for what was truly in their interest, the top one percent would see their influence wane rapidly. It is the height of insanity that the public keeps on voting for politicians who espouse policies that are designed to benefit the economic elite.

***

Tax

***

Note: A recent finding by Oxfam that the top one percent will control fifty percent of the worlds’ wealth by 2016.

Channel Surfing the ME-P

Have you visited our other topic channels? Established to facilitate idea exchange and link our community together, the value of these topics is dependent upon your input. Please take a minute to visit. And, to prevent that annoying spam, we ask that you register. It is fast, free and secure.

More:

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details