Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds.
THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
On Classical Conditioning VERSUS Operant Conditioning
By David Mikkelson
***
Classical conditioning (also known as Pavlovian or respondent conditioning) is a learning process in which an innate response to a potent stimulus comes to be elicited in response to a previously neutral stimulus; this is achieved by repeated pairings of the neutral stimulus with the potent stimulus.
VERSUS
Operant conditioning (also “instrumental conditioning”) is a learning principle in which environmental contingencies—or more specifically, discriminative stimuli (antecedents) influencing its consequences—are controlled and manipulated to change behavior.
***
***
LINK: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/one-man-and-a-baby-box/
Traditional Finance VERSUS Behavioral Finance
LINK: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2019/07/08/on-traditional-v-behavioral-finance/
***
8
***
Share this:
Filed under: Ethics | Tagged: B.F. Skinner, classical conditioning, operant conditioning | Leave a comment »
You must be logged in to post a comment.