A Review of LP / LLC Transfer Hazards for Physicians

Join Our Mailing List

Can standard boilerplate and default corporate law provisions inadvertently disinherit your family from controlling the business or cost millions in additional estate/gift tax?

By Ed Morrow, JD, LL.M. (tax), MBA, CFP®

[Manager, Wealth Strategies Communications, Key Private Bank]

Many physicians use limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships or limited partnerships (“LLCs”, “LLPs” and “LPs”) to operate a trade or business, to hold real estate, or even to hold investment assets.  When only immediate family are owners, these are often referred to as family limited partnerships or limited liability companies (“FLPs” and “FLLCs”).  There are numerous business, asset protection and estate planning reasons for using these entities (hereinafter lumped together for simplicity as “LLCs”).  In many cases, these are preferable to old-fashioned corporations (see separate companion article on LP/LLC Advantages).

As a doctor – you must be very careful, however, when transferring LLC shares during lifetime or at death, to your spouse, children, trusts or others.  Especially when there are co-owners outside the immediate family.  This is due to a stark difference between LLC/partnership law and corporate law and the concept known as “assignee interests”.  Understanding this is even more crucial in 2012 because of the overwhelming demand and interest in transferring LLC interests to irrevocable trusts to exploit the $5.12million gift tax exclusion, which is slated to reduce to only $1 million in 2013.

An LLC owner (called a “member”, not a “stockholder”) has two bundles of rights:

  1. Economic rights – which are the rights to receive property from the LLC both during existence and upon liquidation, along with tax attributes and profit/losses; and
  2. Management rights – the right to vote, participate in management and receive reports and accountings.

It is the latter category that can cause problems when transferring LLC interests by gift or at death.

Members of an LLC usually establish an Operating Agreement to set the rules for transfer of interests.  State statutes (such as the Uniform Limited Liability Company Act) usually provide default rules where the document is silent.

The problem occurs when an LLC member transfers a portion of his or her ownership interest in the LLC to another person, either during lifetime or at death.  At that point, the transferee may become a “mere assignee” of the LLC interest, and not a full “substitute member.”  Under the laws of most states, unless the Operating Agreement provides or parties otherwise agree, an assignee only receives the transferor’s economic rights in the LLC, but not the management rights.

In fact, some court cases require member consent even if the operating agreement seems to otherwise permit such transfers (Ott v. Monroe, 719 S.E.2d 309, 282 Va. 403 (2011).  These state laws were enacted to protect business owners from unwillingly becoming partners with someone they never intended or contracted to be partners with.

This treatment is completely different from transferring C or S corporation stock – when you buy P&G stock, you get the same rights as the previous owner.  S Corporation stock is not even allowed to have differing classes of ownership interests (although voting/non-voting is permitted).  Usually, this quirk in the law has numerous asset protection benefits to LLC owners (discussed in the companion article), but it can cause havoc to one’s business planning in unforeseen circumstances.

Examples of Inadvertent Loss of Control

#1- Doctors Able and Baker, unrelated parties, form and operate an LLC.  Able owns 49% and Baker owns 51%.  Baker has a controlling interest in the LLC.  Baker dies and his 51% interest in the LLC is transferred to his revocable living trust.  Now, the trust is a “mere assignee” and while the trust receives 100% of Baker’s economic rights in the LLC (51% of the total LLC economic rights), it has none of the management rights.  After Baker’s death, Able will have 100% of the LLC’s management rights.  The trustee may have serious difficulty even getting books and records of the LLC, much less have any say on reviewing Able’s business decisions (including new hire and new salary expectations).

#2 – Same ownership structure as above, but Baker leaves assets via Transfer on Death designation or via Will to his spouse, children or others directly.  Same result.

#3 – Same ownership scenario as above, but Baker gifts his membership interests during life to his spouse, children, UTMA account or an irrevocable grantor trust.  Same result.

#3a – Same scenario as above, but Baker simply transfers his shares to his revocable living trust (called “funding”) via Schedule A attached to trust or other assignment.  Same result.

#4 – Same scenario, but Dr. Baker got express permission of Able to transfer his LLC interest to his revocable living trust and have it remain a full substitute member.  No issue – until Baker dies and the LLC interests pass to a new subtrust, such as a bypass, marital, QTIP, or other irrevocable trust, or to beneficiaries outright.  Able must have agreed to this subsequent transfer as well, otherwise the transfer to the new subtrust will be a mere assignee interest and the Baker family loses control.

Creditor Issues

Again, Able and Baker own 49%/51%.  Baker has some creditor issues from a tort claim and co-signed loans unrelated to the LLC.  He files bankruptcy to reorganize or get a clean start (or perhaps the creditor forces a bankruptcy).  This is probably another trigger that causes Baker to lose all of his management rights in the LLC.

Incapacity Issues

Again, Able and Baker own 49% and 51% economic and management rights respectively.  This time, Baker has a stroke or an accident and his wife or one of his family takes over as guardian or conservator.  Similar result.  Able now has 100% controlling management rights, even though Baker still keeps the same economic rights.  He can fire Baker and raise his own salary.

Estate/Gift Tax Issues 

Able and Baker’s company is worth $10Million.  Baker’s 51% interest gets marketability discount, but a controlling premium, so valuation experts and the IRS agree it is worth $4Million.  Able’s 49% interest gets a marketability and lack of control discount, so his interest is only worth $3 million.  Yet when Baker dies, he leaves this 51% interest to his spouse (or marital trust) as a mere assignee, and because the interest has no voting control or management rights, it may be worth only about $3 million in the hands of the spouse/trust (because there is no “control” or management rights, the 51% is worth considerably less).  Thus, Baker’s 51% interest is taxed at $4 million, but only gets a $3 million marital deduction (this same discrepancy is true for charitable gifts, which is why physicians should also be careful gifting LLC interests to charities or charitable trusts).  Did $1 million in value inadvertently pass to Able?  At best, this wastes Baker’s estate tax exemption.  At worst, it may lead to an additional 55% tax (and probably penalties, since it would unlikely be reported and caught on audit) on $1million, or $550,000 additional tax that could easily be avoided.

This same issue arises in gifting shares to a spouse or to a trust for a spouse that is intended to qualify for the marital deduction (or to charities or charitable trusts).

In addition, gifting a mere “assignee” interest risks disqualifying any LLC/LP gifts for the “present interest” annual exclusion under IRC 2503(e) ($13,000 per donor per donee) pursuant to the recent IRS wins in the Hackl, Fisher and Price cases.

Furthermore, it adds grist to a favorite line of attack that the IRS uses to add to taxpayers’ estate tax bill.  If a taxpayer has a “retained interest” in a gift, the IRS has been successful in pulling such gifts back into a taxpayer’s estate (therefore causing additional 35-55% estate tax).

What Can Physicians Who Own LP/LLCs Do?

If you want to transfer both economic rights and management rights in your LLCs, similar to shares of stock of a corporation, then the LLC’s written Operating Agreement should be reviewed and/or revised to admit certain transferees or assignees (like a guardian/conservator, spouse, children, trust, subtrusts, etc) as full “substitute members”, while other transferees (like creditors, ex-spouses) can remain “mere assignees”, with no management rights.

LLC owners may decide on other variations on the above solution if desired.  For instance, some owners might prefer to exclude a surviving spouse or children from management rights, but be perfectly comfortable with having an independent or agreed upon trustee of a marital trust accede to those rights.  The key to good planning is to know the consequences of gifts/bequests beforehand to adequately plan.

Make sure your entire wealth management team is on the same page when orchestrating your wealth planning.  Ask whether they use a checklist of any sorts in their planning, or even if they do, whether they communicate the checklist with other advisors on your team – many do not.

Assessment

As noted in Atul Gawande’s The Checklist Manifesto, simple checklists can often prevent mistakes and miscommunications among even the most educated of professionals – this is certainly true for asset protection and tax planning for LLC interests, and at no time more than in 2012 with all of the anticipated tax changes and proposals threatening to snare any missteps in planning.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

© 2012 Edwin P. Morrow III and KeyBank, NA.  The author holds the following designations:  J.D., LL.M. (masters in tax law), MBA, CFP® and RFC®.  He is a Board Certified Specialist in Estate Planning, Probate and Trust Law through the Ohio State Bar Association.  He is an approved arbitrator for the Financial Industry Regulatory Association (FINRA).  He currently provides educational and consultative services nationwide for the financial advisors and clients of Key Private Bank.  Contact:  (937) 285-5343 or:  Edwin_P_Morrow@KeyBank.com Ed is also a friend of the ME-P and designated “thought-leader”. 

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Product Details  Product Details

Using Charitable Gifts in Business Planning

The “S” Corporation

Join Our Mailing List

By The Children’s Home Society of Florida Foundation

The most common type of corporation is a traditional “C” corporation. All companies whose stock is publicly traded are C corporations. C corporations pay tax on net income at the corporate level. When that income is distributed to shareholders in the form of dividends, the shareholders also pay tax. The result is that C corporation income is taxed twice – once at the corporate level and once at the shareholder level.

“S” Election

“S” corporations resemble C corporations except that they elect to be taxed differently. Not all corporations are eligible to make this election. To make the election, a corporation must have only one class of stock and less than 75 shareholders who are all individuals, estates and certain types of trusts and charities. IRC Sec. 1361. Charitable remainder trusts are not permissible holders of Subchapter S stock.

“Pass-Through” Taxation

An S corporation does not pay tax at the corporate level. Instead, the shareholders of an S corporation must include their share of the S corporation’s income, deductions and credits on the shareholder’s personal tax return – even if that income isn’t actually distributed. This is called “pass-through” taxation because the S corporation “passes” its income, deductions and credits “through” to its shareholders.

Inside and Outside Basis

The concept of tax basis appears regularly in the context of charitable giving. A person’s tax basis in an asset is generally equal to his or her investment in that asset. Often, tax basis is the amount a person paid for an asset (i.e. the asset’s “cost” to the owner). When the fair market value of an asset is more than its tax basis, the asset is appreciated and, if sold, will result in taxable gain to the owner. Charitable giving often allows the owner of an appreciated asset to bypass gain or defer part of the gain.

When working with S corporations, the concept of basis can be confusing. This is because there are two types of basis at issue. The first is the S corporation’s basis in its assets — this is often referred to as inside basis. The second is the shareholder’s basis in his or her S corporation stock – this is often referred to as outside basis.

When a shareholder sells his S corporation stock, the gain or loss on the sale is determined by the difference between the sale price and the outside basis. In the same way, when an S corporation disposes of an asset, the gain or loss to the S corporation is determined by the difference between the sale price and the S corporation’s inside basis in the asset.

 

Gifts of S Corporation Stock – Issues Relating to the Donor

Certain tax-exempt organizations are permissible shareholders of Subchapter S stock. Sec. 1361(c)(6). Therefore, an owner of S corporation stock can make a gift of the stock to a charitable organization and receive an income tax deduction. There are a few issues the donor needs to be aware of, however, before making a gift of Sub S stock to charity.

First, the donor’s ability to use the charitable deduction from the gift of the Sub S stock will be limited to the donor’s cost basis in his or her S corporation stock. Sec. 1366(d)(1) limits the amount of deductions and losses to the donor’s basis in stock and debt of the Sub S corporation. Often the donor of Sub S stock is also the person who established the business. Generally, the business was started with very little capital. Because of this, it is likely that the donor’s cost basis will be very low. If the donor’s basis in his or her stock is very low, the donor will only have a small charitable deduction.

The second issue for the donor to be aware of is minority discount. Generally, when a donor makes a gift of stock, the amount transferred to the charity represents a minority interest in the corporation. When a minority interest is given, it is very likely that the qualified appraiser will apply a discount to the value of the stock.

Finally, the donor of S corporation stock must be aware that there cannot be a binding agreement with the charity to repurchase the stock. If there is a binding agreement, the donor will have to recognize the income from the redemption of the stock and will not receive the benefit of a bypass of capital gain. Because S corporations are closely-held entities, there generally is not a large market for the sale of the stock. Therefore, it is very likely that the corporation will repurchase the stock. The repurchase is permissible, but a binding agreement before the gift is prohibited. Rev. Rul. 78-197.

Gifts of S Corporation Stock – Issues Relating to the Charity

While it is allowable for a charity to own Subchapter S stock, the tax benefits are not as advantageous as the ownership of C corporation stock. With C corporation stock, the charity is not taxable on any stock dividends, nor is it taxable on the gain when it sells the stock. This is not true with S corporation stock. Any income received by the charity for its ownership of Sub S stock is taxable to the charity as unrelated business taxable income. Sec. 512(e). In addition, when the charity sells the stock the gain from the sale is also taxable to the charity as unrelated business taxable income. Sec. 512(e)(1)(B)(ii). Because a charity is often established as a corporation itself, the tax on the gain will be taxed at corporate income tax rates. (corporations do not have a lower, favorable capital gains rate like individual taxpayers).

It is also important for a charity not to enter into a binding agreement with the donor for the sale of the stock. While there are no adverse tax consequences to the charity if such an agreement is made, there are adverse tax consequences to the donor as discussed above. If the charity is aware of the unfavorable tax consequences to the donor from having a binding agreement, it can prevent having an unhappy donor.

The S Corporation Unitrust

A charitable remainder unitrust or CRUT is not a permissible owner of Subchapter S stock. Therefore, if an S corporation shareholder were to transfer even one share of his or her S stock into a CRT, the S corporation election would be terminated and the corporation would become a C corporation the day after the transfer. This would mean that the corporation would be subject to two layers of tax: one at the corporate level and one at the shareholder level.

It is permissible, however, for the S corporation itself to establish a CRUT. Because the S corporation does not have a life expectancy, the CRUT must be established for a term of years not to exceed 20. The S corporation would fund the CRUT with some of its assets. However, it must be careful not to fund the CRUT with substantially all of its assets as discussed below. Because the S corporation is funding the CRUT, it would receive the charitable deduction and also would be the income beneficiary of the CRUT.

Even though the S corporation is entitled to the income tax deduction, because of its pass-through taxation the charitable deduction will flow through to the S corporation shareholders. As mentioned above, however, the deduction to the shareholders will be limited to the shareholders’ cost basis in their Sub S stock.

Potential Reg. 1.337(d)-4 Gain Recognition

When a corporation is liquidated, there is potential tax payable at the corporate level. If it were permissible for a corporation to distribute all of its assets to charity or to a charitable trust, then this tax could be avoided. In order to limit this type of transaction, Reg. 1.337(d)-4 requires recognition of gain at the corporate level if “substantially all” the assets are given to charity or to a charitable remainder trust.

Even though an S corporation is not subject to tax like a C corporation, if an S corporation liquidates the corporation must recognize gain as if the assets were sold. The S corporation does not pay taxes on the gain, but the gain passes through to the shareholders who must report the taxable gain.

The phrase “substantially all” is not defined in Sec. 337(b)(2) or in Reg. 1.337(d)-4. However, there are several other places in the Code in which the phrase “substantially all” is interpreted to mean 85%. Reg. 1.514(b)-1(b)(1)(ii). Reg. 53.4942(b)-1(c). Reg. 53.4946-1(b)(2). Reg. 1.401(k)-1(d)(1)(ii). While these regulations cover a variety of tax issues, it is significant that they uniformly interpret the phrase “substantially all” to mean 85%.

Since the exception under Sec. 337 refers to “an 80%” subsidiary, some counsel have also expressed the belief that “substantially all” could be interpreted to be 80%. Regardless, it is apparent that a transfer of perhaps 65% of assets to charity or to a charitable trust would be permissible under Sec. 337(b)(2). Cautious counsel would be prudent in remaining at or below that level with transfers to charity.

Financial Planning Strategies

While the use of a CRT is more limited with an S corporation then with a C corporation, there is still the possibility of utilizing a CRT when selling a business. For example, Tom and Suzie started a business years ago creating designer clothing for dogs. Tom and Suzie liked the idea of have a corporation to protect them from potential liabilities, but they did not like the idea of the double tax system. Therefore, they established their business as an S corporation. Tom and Suzie are the sole shareholders and are now planning to retire. Over the years they have supported a number of charities that assist in the prevention of cruelty to animals. Tom and Suzie are hoping to use some of the money they receive from the sale of the business to continue to support such charities.

Recently Tom and Suzie have had a number of inquires for the sale of their business. It seems that designer clothing and accessories for dogs has become a booming business. Tom and Suzie met with the gift planner from their favorite charity and like the idea of a CRUT that would pay them an income stream over their two lives. However, they discovered that because they have an S corporation they cannot transfer the stock to a CRT without losing their S election status. Tom and Suzie do not want to convert their business to a C corporation. Tom and Suzie can, however, have the S corporation use some of its assets to fund a CRUT that would pay for 20 years. However, they must take steps to ensure that the CRT is not disqualified.

First, Tom and Suzie have to carefully choose which assets the S corporation will use to fund the CRUT. The value of those assets cannot be substantially all of the value of the corporation. Further, they have to ensure that there is not any unrelated business taxable income while the assets are in the CRUT. Even $1 of unrelated business taxable income will disqualify the tax-exempt status of the CRUT. If Tom and Suzie decide to use any of the corporation’s equipment or inventory, the deduction of the CRUT will be limited to the corporation’s cost basis in those assets, which is very low. The S corporation does own the building and land on which it operates and the value of the land and building represents about 50% of the S corporation assets.

To make sure that the CRUT will work, Tom and Suzie enter into lease agreements with two of their key employees. Under the first lease, the employees will lease the operating assets of the S corporation. Under the second lease, the two employees will lease the building and land. Both leases are fixed payment leases. By establishing the leases, the S corporation can transfer some of its assets into the CRUT and avoid the unrelated business income tax problem.
Once the leases are established, the S corporation will transfer title of the real estate to the CRUT. To avoid potential self-dealing issues, Tom and Suzie decide to select their local bank to serve as trustee of the CRUT. Once the land is transferred to the CRUT, the trustee, along with Tom and Suzie, will negotiate for the sale of the assets and the land and building. After the sale is completed, the CRUT will receive the proceeds from the sale of the real estate and the S corporation will receive the proceeds from the sale of the operating assets.

The sale of the operating assets will trigger gain for the S corporation that will flow through to Tom and Suzie as the shareholders. It is important for Tom and Suzie to leave this cash in the S corporation. This is because the gain from the sale will increase Tom and Suzie’s cost basis in their S corporation stock. The increase in the cost basis will allow them to use more of the charitable deduction that will flow through to them from the S corporation. Over the years, the S corporation unitrust will make payments to the S corporation. So long as the S corporation was not a prior C corporation, the passive income from the CRUT will not pose any problems for the S corporation.

Tom and Suzie are very happy with the sale of their business and that they are able to provide a very nice gift to their favorite charity. They are also very happy that they now get to take a long needed vacation.

Assessment

There are a number of charitable strategies that can be used when selling a business. Tom and Suzie could have established a charitable gift annuity with their Sub S stock. They also could have used a gift and sale strategy. There are other options available to Tom and Suzie if they chose not to keep the S corporation alive for the 20 year term of the trust. This article is the first in a series that will explore the options of using businesses and business assets to fund charitable gifts. Throughout this series, planning options with C corporations, S corporations, partnerships, LLCs and sole proprietorships will be discussed.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details