REVERSAL OF FORTUNE: For E.S.G. Investors?

Environmental, Social and Governance Investing

SPONSOR: http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com

***

***

An Informed Op-Ed Piece

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd

As many medical, dental and podiatric colleagues are aware, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing refers to a set of standards for a company’s behavior used by socially conscious investors to screen potential investments. Over the last decade, or so, I have seen many investors pursing this laudable aim.

Yet, more than 80% of private equity fund managers have now stepped away from at least one deal due to ESG concerns, according to the 2023 BDO Private Capital Survey. The reasons are complex, and point towards fund managers’ sentiment towards risk-reward in the current economic environment.

This retreat from ESG is due to backlash from conservatives who are critical of the idea that mutual fund managers should be considering any other factor but a company’s share holders in their investment decisions. Accusations of “Greenwashing” have also plagued many ESG funds, which is when an asset management firm charging higher fees or a specific thematic fund without actually delivering a unique investment strategic competitive advantage.

Greenwashing is the process of conveying a false impression or misleading information about how a company’s products are environmentally sound. Greenwashing involves making an unsubstantiated claim to deceive consumers and / or investors into believing that a company’s products are environmentally friendly or have a greater positive environmental impact than they actually do. Greenwashing may also occur when a company attempts to emphasize sustainable aspects of a product to overshadow the company’s involvement in environmentally damaging practices.

ESG: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2023/09/23/mas-and-esg-profit/

***

***

According to internationally known linguistics and cognitive science Professor, Mackenzie Hope Marcinko PhD of the University of Delaware, greenwashing is performed through the use of environmental imagery, misleading labels, cognitive biases and tendencies hiding tradeoffs. Greenwashing is also a play on the term “Whitewashing,” which means using false information to intentionally hide wrongdoing, errors or an unpleasant situation in an attempt to make it seem less bad than it really is.

To be sure, uncertainty around ESG regulations in the USA is leading financial deal makers to tread carefully. For example, Jim Clayton MBA, a private equity advisor also from the University of Delaware recently stated:

  • We’re a year past when the SEC said they were going to issue ESG reporting standards for public filers which has created more noise in the system.”
  • “People are nervous about what I would call ESG-intense exposed industries, in other words, those with “heavy carbon footprints”.

MORE ESG: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2023/03/27/on-socially-responsible-investing-2/

And, a federal judge in Texas said that American Airlines violated federal law by basing investment decisions for its employee retirement plan on environmental, social, and other non-financial factors. The ruling in January 2025 by US District Judge Reed O’Connor appeared to be the first of its kind amid growing backlash by conservatives to an uptick in socially-conscious investing. O’Connor said American had breached its legal duty to make investment decisions based solely on the financial interests of 401(k) plan beneficiaries by allowing BlackRock, its asset manager and a major shareholder, to focus on environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors.

Even the State of Florida pulled $2 billion from the investment management firm BlackRock in the largest divestment ever made. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis claimed that by taking ESG standards into account when making investment decisions, the firm isn’t prioritizing the financial bottom line for Floridians.

Assessment

But, for a few years at least, things were indeed good. In 2020 and 2021, ESG funds outperformed the market by ~4.3%.

Conclusion

So, always remember [caveat emptor]: let the buyer beware!

References and Readings:

1. 2023 BDO Private Capital Survey: https://insights.bdo.com/2023-BDO-Private-Capital-Survey.html

2. Marcinko, DE; Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors [Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™] Productivity Press, New York, 2017 

3. Marcinko, DE: Dictionary of Health Economics and Finance. Springer Publishing Company, NY 2006.

4. Zymeri, Jeff: ‘Not Going to Fly Here’ [DeSantis Signs Far-Reaching Anti-ESG Bill into Law]. 2023: https://www.yahoo.com/news/not-going-fly-desantis-signs-121648679.html

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Refer and Like

***

EDUCATION: Books

SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit a RFP for speaking engagements: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com 

***

***

ESG Investing: Not So Hot … Anymore?

By Staff Reporters

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Florida is pulling $2 billion from BlackRock in the largest divestment ever made as part of the growing vendetta against Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing practices. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and other Republican leaders claim that by taking ESG standards into account when making investment decisions, the firm isn’t prioritizing the bottom line. But, for a few years, things were good. In 2020 and 2021, ESG funds outperformed the market by ~4.3%.

DEFINITION: According to Wikipedia, ESG (environmental, social, and corporate governance) data reflect the externalities (costs to others) an organization is generating with respect to the environment, to society and to corporate governance. ESG data can be used by investors to assess the material risk the organization is taking and by the organization itself as metrics for strategic and managerial purposes. Investors may also use ESG data beyond assessing material risks to the organization in their evaluation of enterprise value, specifically by designing models based on assumptions that the identification, assessment and management of sustainability-related risks and opportunities in respect to all organizational stakeholders leads to higher long-term risk-adjusted return. Organizational stakeholders include but not limited to customers, suppliers, employees, leadership, and the environment.

CITE: https://www.r2library.com/Resource/Title/082610254

Since 2020, there has been accelerating interest in overlaying ESG data with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), developed based on work by United Nations beginning in the 1980s.

LINK: http://www.ESG.org

The term ESG was popularly used first in a 2004 report titled “Who Cares Wins”, which was a joint initiative of financial institutions at the invitation of UN. In less than 20 years, the ESG movement has grown from a corporate social responsibility initiative launched by the United Nations into a global phenomenon representing more than US$30 trillion in assets under management. In the year 2019 alone, capital totaling US$17.67 billion flowed into ESG-linked products, an almost 525 percent increase from 2015, according to Morningstar, Inc.. Critics claim ESG linked-products have not had and are unlikely to have the intended impact of raising the cost of capital for polluting firms, and have accused the movement of greenwashing.

PODCAST: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2022/10/10/podcast-what-is-financial-green-washing/

Now All Mad

DeSantis ran his most recent campaign on fighting the “woke ideology” he believes is infiltrating the state. As part of the fight, Florida passed a resolution in August that said ESG standards should be ignored when investing state funds.

And he’s not the only one:

  • Other Republican-controlled states, including Missouri and Louisiana, have moved almost $1.3 billion away from BlackRock for similar reasons.
  • Texas flagged BlackRock as a financial firm that boycotts the state’s energy industry (something BlackRock has denied).

Meanwhile, Democrats aren’t happy either…they criticize BlackRock and ESG investing in general for not going far enough (and for using lax standards that let oil giants onto lists of ESG investments).

Bottom line: According to the Morning Brew, BlackRock and Florida are now cursed to yell “How could you prioritize politics over returns?” back and forth for eternity, and the debate over ESG investing is far from over. Republicans are poised to take over the House—after a campaign season that BlackRock poured record cash into—so we’re likely to see more drama play out at the federal level soon.

***

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Thank You

***

ORDER: https://www.routledge.com/Comprehensive-Financial-Planning-Strategies-for-Doctors-and-Advisors-Best/Marcinko-Hetico/p/book/9781482240283

***