• Member Statistics

    • 754,416 Colleagues-to-Date [Sponsored by a generous R&D grant from iMBA, Inc.]
  • David E. Marcinko [Editor-in-Chief]

    As a former Dean and appointed Distinguished University Professor and Endowed Department Chair, Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA was a NYSE broker and investment banker for a decade who was respected for his unique perspectives, balanced contrarian thinking and measured judgment to influence key decision makers in strategic education, health economics, finance, investing and public policy management.

    Dr. Marcinko is originally from Loyola University MD, Temple University in Philadelphia and the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center in PA; as well as Oglethorpe University and Emory University in Georgia, the Atlanta Hospital & Medical Center; Kellogg-Keller Graduate School of Business and Management in Chicago, and the Aachen City University Hospital, Koln-Germany. He became one of the most innovative global thought leaders in medical business entrepreneurship today by leveraging and adding value with strategies to grow revenues and EBITDA while reducing non-essential expenditures and improving dated operational in-efficiencies.

    Professor David Marcinko was a board certified surgical fellow, hospital medical staff President, public and population health advocate, and Chief Executive & Education Officer with more than 425 published papers; 5,150 op-ed pieces and over 135+ domestic / international presentations to his credit; including the top ten [10] biggest drug, DME and pharmaceutical companies and financial services firms in the nation. He is also a best-selling Amazon author with 30 published academic text books in four languages [National Institute of Health, Library of Congress and Library of Medicine].

    Dr. David E. Marcinko is past Editor-in-Chief of the prestigious “Journal of Health Care Finance”, and a former Certified Financial Planner® who was named “Health Economist of the Year” in 2010. He is a Federal and State court approved expert witness featured in hundreds of peer reviewed medical, business, economics trade journals and publications [AMA, ADA, APMA, AAOS, Physicians Practice, Investment Advisor, Physician’s Money Digest and MD News] etc.

    Later, Dr. Marcinko was a vital recruited BOD member of several innovative companies like Physicians Nexus, First Global Financial Advisors and the Physician Services Group Inc; as well as mentor and coach for Deloitte-Touche and other start-up firms in Silicon Valley, CA.

    As a state licensed life, P&C and health insurance agent; and dual SEC registered investment advisor and representative, Marcinko was Founding Dean of the fiduciary and niche focused CERTIFIED MEDICAL PLANNER® chartered professional designation education program; as well as Chief Editor of the three print format HEALTH DICTIONARY SERIES® and online Wiki Project.

    Dr. David E. Marcinko’s professional memberships included: ASHE, AHIMA, ACHE, ACME, ACPE, MGMA, FMMA, FPA and HIMSS. He was a MSFT Beta tester, Google Scholar, “H” Index favorite and one of LinkedIn’s “Top Cited Voices”.

    Marcinko is “ex-officio” and R&D Scholar-on-Sabbatical for iMBA, Inc. who was recently appointed to the MedBlob® [military encrypted medical data warehouse and health information exchange] Advisory Board.



  • ME-P Information & Content Channels

  • ME-P Archives Silo [2006 – 2019]

  • Ann Miller RN MHA [Managing Editor]

    USNews.com, Reuters.com,
    News Alloy.com,
    and Congress.org

    Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners(TM)

    Product Details

    Product Details

    Product Details


    New "Self-Directed" Study Option SinceJanuary 1st, 2018
  • Most Recent ME-Ps

  • PodiatryPrep.org

    Lower Extremity Trauma
    [Click on Image to Enlarge]

  • ME-P Free Advertising Consultation

    The “Medical Executive-Post” is about connecting doctors, health care executives and modern consulting advisors. It’s about free-enterprise, business, practice, policy, personal financial planning and wealth building capitalism. We have an attitude that’s independent, outspoken, intelligent and so Next-Gen; often edgy, usually controversial. And, our consultants “got fly”, just like U. Read it! Write it! Post it! “Medical Executive-Post”. Call or email us for your FREE advertising and sales consultation TODAY [770.448.0769]

    Product Details

    Product Details

  • Medical & Surgical e-Consent Forms

  • iMBA R&D Services

    Commission a Subject Matter Expert Report [$250-$999]January 1st, 2019
    Medical Clinic Valuations * Endowment Fund Management * Health Capital Formation * Investment Policy Statement Analysis * Provider Contracting & Negotiations * Marketplace Competition * Revenue Cycle Enhancements; and more! HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
  • iMBA Inc., OFFICES

    Suite #5901 Wilbanks Drive, Norcross, Georgia, 30092 USA [1.770.448.0769]. Our location is real and we are now virtually enabled to assist new long distance clients and out-of-town colleagues.

  • ME-P Publishing


    If you want the opportunity to work with leading health care industry insiders, innovators and watchers, the “ME-P” may be right for you? We are unbiased and operate at the nexus of theoretical and applied R&D. Collaborate with us and you’ll put your brand in front of a smart & tightly focused demographic; one at the forefront of our emerging healthcare free marketplace of informed and professional “movers and shakers.” Our Ad Rate Card is available upon request [770-448-0769].

  • Reader Comments, Quips, Opinions, News & Updates

  • Start-Up Advice for Businesses, DRs and Entrepreneurs

    ImageProxy “Providing Management, Financial and Business Solutions for Modernity”
  • Up-Trending ME-Ps

  • Capitalism and Free Enterprise Advocacy

    Whether you’re a mature CXO, physician or start-up entrepreneur in need of management, financial, HR or business planning information on free markets and competition, the "Medical Executive-Post” is the online place to meet for Capitalism 2.0 collaboration. Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds. ******************************************************************** THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
  • OIG Fraud Warnings

    Beware of health insurance marketplace scams OIG's Most Wanted Fugitives at oig.hhs.gov

Ban on Referenced Based Drug Pricing

Join Our Mailing List

A Medicare and CMS Three-Sixty

[By Staff Reporters]rboa_16

According to Jane Zhang and Vanessa Fuhrmans of the Wall Street Journal, on January 10, 2009, the last days of the Bush administration saw a proposed ban that allows private insurers to charge Medicare beneficiaries stiff penalties if they choose brand-name drugs instead of cheaper generic drugs.

Referenced Based Pricing

Under reference-based drug pricing, the penalty for insisting on a brand-name drug often amounts to the price difference between the drug and the generic version, plus a copayment. In some cases, that leaves patients paying the full price of the brand-name drug. In contrast, buyers of brand-name drugs when there is no generic equivalent are charged just a copayment. Nearly 10% of drug plans used the pricing technique to steer beneficiaries to lower-cost generics www.HealthDictionarySeries.com 

CMS Announcement

Of course, the announcement from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services came after lawmakers and patient advocates protested that reference-based pricing made it difficult for consumers to calculate drug costs.

CMS Renouncement

But, the agency reversed itself 360 degrees this week, proposing to ban such pricing for the 2010 drug plans. The WSJ reported that complicated formulas made it “very difficult to accurately convey the extent of expected out-of-pocket spending” for prescription drugs. And, “The basis for this decision is our belief that reference-based pricing may be inherently misleading to beneficiaries and inconsistent with our goal of improving transparency.”

The Pfizer-Wyeth Drug Deal

Following the ban, investors appeared skeptical about the just announced Pfizer-Wyeth drug deal. Pfizer will pay $68 billion for Wyeth, which is the biggest in the drug sector since 2000. The merger comes as Pfizer faces the difficult hurdle of dealing with patent expirations for some of its biggest drugs, including its cholesterol-lowering Lipitor, which makes up about 25% of the company’s overall sales.


The ban is part of CMS’s criteria for prescription-drug plans that insurers will offer for 2010. The criteria won’t be final until March, leaving a narrow window for the Obama administration to change them.


Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com


Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details


7 Responses

  1. Did you know that the Senate Finance Committee just approved an amendment to require pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to report drug pricing, competition and how much savings are being passed on to consumers?




  2. Painkillers Darvon, Darvocet Withdrawn at FDA Request

    The maker of Darvon and Darvocet announced recently that it would stop marketing the widely used painkillers in the US because a new study links the active ingredient to serious and sometimes fatal heart rhythm abnormalities.

    The FDA requested the withdrawal and urged doctors to stop prescribing the drugs immediately. But, it advised patients to keep taking their medication while consulting quickly with physicians to find an alternative. Pain management experts said the drugs are easily replaceable. The decision follows years of controversy about Darvon’s dangerous side-effects

    Source: Andrew Zajac, Los Angeles Times [11/20/10]


  3. Gray-Market Drugs?

    Fifty-two percent of hospital purchasing agents and pharmacists reported they’d bought drugs from so-called “gray market” vendors during the previous two years, according to a just-released survey of 549 hospitals by the Institute for Safe Medication practices, an advocacy group.




  4. Generic Drugs Saved $1.46 Trillion From 2006-2015

    The Generic Pharmaceutical Association recently released a report on generic prescription drug savings and access. Here are some key findings from the report:

    • Branded specialty drugs are 1% of prescriptions but 30% of total drug spending.
    • Generics make up 89% of prescriptions but 27% of total drug spending.
    • 3.9 billion prescriptions dispensed in 2015 were for generic drugs.
    • Generic drugs saved $1.46 trillion in spending from 2006-2015.
    • From 2005 to 2015, generic savings increased 328%.
    • Medicare savings from generics totaled $67.6 billion in 2015.

    Source: Generic Pharmaceutical Association, October 19, 2016


  5. Update 2017

    Despite increased scrutiny over drug pricing the past several years and the desire for value-based pricing models, such arrangements between health plans and life sciences companies currently remain rare. Those who have experimented with value-based contracting cite several current challenges.

    However, as noted in our recent policy brief, the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures) clarifies the communication of economic evidence between health plans and biopharma companies and advances the application of real-world evidence (RWE). As a result, value-based contracts for drug pricing will likely become more common.

    Current challenges with value-based contracting for life sciences companies include:

    • Determining the appropriate measures of value to link payment;
    • Controlling for non-treatment factors that can influence outcomes;
    • Developing administrative capabilities to operationalize value-based care; and,
    • Capturing, integrating, and analyzing real-world data to analyze outcomes.

    Performance monitoring for such contracts requires new tools and technology as well as infrastructure that some biopharma companies really have not invested in over the past few years. The Cures Act clarifies the nature of economic evidence that can be shared with stakeholders including formulary committees, payers, PBMs, and others responsible for reimbursement. This change can help overcome the first challenge around determining the measures of value to link payment.

    The Cures Act also allows the FDA to accept new sources of evidence, including data that is collected in the real-world, outside of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This RWE also can be used to track outcomes tied to payments as part of value-based contracts, helping to address another key challenge. According to our recent benchmarking study, 54 percent of biopharma companies are investing in building up their capabilities around RWE. As companies build capabilities to capture, integrate, and analyze RWE, we may see the adoption of value-based contracts increase.

    Moving forward, value-based contracts are more likely to be implemented for products that have measurable outcomes in specialty disease areas, where products are relatively new and the value has yet to be proven in the real world.

    Sonal Shah, PharmD
    [Senior Manager]
    Deloitte Center for Health Solutions


  6. Reference Based Pricing Research – Experience With Prescription Drugs and Procedures

    Reference Pricing is an insurance benefit design that encourages enrollees to favor providers charging low prices for non-emergency “shoppable” surgical procedures, diagnostic tests, and pharmaceuticals. Reference pricing can motivate providers to compete based on price as well as quality, and to pursue cost-reducing innovations.

    The Berkeley Center for Health Technology (BCHT) conducted a series of studies on the impact of reference pricing on consumer choice, provider prices, and savings for surgical procedures (orthopedics, ophthalmology), diagnostic procedures (CT scans, MRI scans, colonoscopies), laboratory tests, and prescription drugs, using health insurance data from insurers, self-insured employers, and employer associations.

    Reference pricing was shown to channel consumer choice toward lower-priced providers and products, and to significantly reduce spending. No effect was observed in utilization rates or in surgical complications. The implementation of reference pricing was associated with increases in consumer cost sharing for some services and products, and in decreases for others.

    Arnez Hinkle


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: