Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds.
THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
The “Soft Science” of Patient Relationship Management
***
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA MEd CMP™
SPONSOR: http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
***
INTRODUCTION
Patient satisfaction occurs when patient perceptions exceed their expectations. They get an intangible “something extra” from their visit, above what they paid for. When patient expectations match their perceptions, mutual obligations are fulfilled, making both practitioner and patient “break-even”.
The clinical result, within a relevant range, is only part of the patient’s perceptions. Numerous sub-conscious impressions comprise the remainder. We’ve all had patients love us despite a less than optimal result. We’ve all had patients angrily leave the practice over some non-clinical matter like a trivial billing dispute. A patient’s perception of any health care service is colored by a vast array of prior experiences that set up current expectations. The patient is pleased to the extent that his current perceptions exceed his/her pre existing expectations. This encompasses far more than the clinical result (within a relevant range), and includes such non-treatment issues as the demeanor of the staff, condition of the physical premises, psychological comfort during the visit, etc.
Remember, all patients talk about you anyway. In the past, a happy patient told four others about what a nice doctor you are. Today, patients post website comments or blogs immediately after their visits. They are more likely to complete treatment and follow instructions, thus obtaining a better medical outcome, and, generating additional fees for the practice. They pay quicker, cause less bad-debt and help create a pleasant environment for us to work in.
An unhappy patient vehemently tells nine others, onground or online, what a nasty greedy rip-off artist you are. Sad, but true! They are not as likely to complete treatment, thus incurring a less than optimal result, and generate fewer fees. They pay slower, if at all, create a stressed environment and detrimentally affect the attitude of other patients in the office.
Try to eliminate problems that might cause negative perceptions (i.e., a filthy restroom) and implement controls that help assure positive perceptions. Patient satisfaction is a soft managerial science. It is a numbers game. Most patients don’t pre-define what would be “acceptable” from this encounter, but have vaguely defined ranges of prior expectations anyway, gleaned from a lifetime of health care related experience. Any variance between these this “acceptable” range of expectations and each trivial encounter invokes some degree positive or negative feeling in the patient.
***
***
The total perception of the office experience is an aggregate of multiple trivial, often subliminal, observations. Patient satisfaction is an intangible and amorphous process complicated by:
Inter patient variables: Significant differences between patients in their “expectations”.
Intra patient variables: A single patient can perceive the same thing or situation differently at different times, depending on uncontrollable variables like mood, or, context of occurrence which may (sometimes and/or partially) be controllable by the practice.
Luck of the draw” in physical variables: Does Sally or Mary escort the patient to the exam room? Was it the blue or green exam room? Did the last patient to use the rest room, five minutes ago, leave a disgusting mess?
Heterogeneous staff variables: Even with appropriate training, people are not machines and have their own quirks.
ASSESSMENT
By proactively anticipating the entire visit, from the patient’s perspective, the practitioner can structure and arrange things such that most patients have, mostly positive perceptions, most of the time. This can be done despite all the potential hetero-genicity of the above factors. Patient satisfaction can be improved in any office, and can be done by anyone.
CONCLUSION
Because patient satisfaction is a multi-faceted amorphous subject, there are multiple correct approaches to the subject and no “cook book” recipe on how to proceed. Try and get the big picture. Identify the worst areas and fix them. Identify the best areas and reinforce them. Proceed slowly. It can be done one facet at a time. Adapt things to your own managerial style and personality. Be completely open to suggestion and change.
Finally, be aware that patient relationship and satisfaction implementation strategies frequently overlap.
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit a RFP for speaking engagements: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Read Refer, Like and Subscribe
***
***
Share this:
Filed under: "Doctors Only", Career Development, CMP Program, Managed Care, Marcinko Associates, Marketing & Advertising, Point-Counter Point, Practice Management | Tagged: certified medical planner, CMP, DDS, DO, doctors, DPM, health, managerial science, Marcinko, medical, medical office, medical patients, office patients, patient management, patient relations management, patient satisfaction, patient variables, patients, physicians, waiting room | Leave a comment »
The Leading Business Education Network for Doctors, Financial Advisors and Health Industry Consultants 