RATE REVIEW: The 80/20 Health Insurance Rule

DEFINITIONS

By Staff Reporters

***

***

Rate Review & the 80/20 Rule

The health care law provides 2 ways to hold insurance companies accountable and help keep your costs down: Rate Review and the 80/20 rule.

Rate Review

Rate Review helps protect you from unreasonable rate increases. Insurance companies must now publicly explain any rate increase of 15% or more before raising your premium. This does not apply to grandfathered plans.

Look up your insurance plan to see its proposed and final rate increase.

80/20 Rule

The 80/20 Rule generally requires insurance companies to spend at least 80% of the money they take in from premiums on health care costs and quality improvement activities. The other 20% can go to administrative, overhead, and marketing costs.

The 80/20 rule is sometimes known as Medical Loss Ratio, or MLR. If an insurance company uses 80 cents out of every premium dollar to pay for your medical claims and activities that improve the quality of care, the company has a Medical Loss Ratio of 80%.

Insurance companies selling to large groups (usually more than 50 employees) must spend at least 85% of premiums on care and quality improvement.

If your insurance company doesn’t meet these requirements, you’ll get a rebate on part of the premium that you paid.

Will I get a rebate check from my insurance company?

If your insurance company doesn’t meet its 80/20 targets for the year, you’ll get back some of the premium that you paid.

You may see the rebate in a number of ways:

  • A rebate check in the mail
  • A lump-sum deposit into the same account that was used to pay the premium, if you paid by credit card or debit card
  • A direct reduction in your future premium
  • Your employer may also use one of the above rebate methods, or apply the rebate in a way that benefits employees

If you or your employer will get a rebate, your insurance company must notify you by August 1.

If you have an individual insurance policy, you’ll get the rebate directly from your insurance company.

For small group and large group plans, the rebate is usually paid to the employer. It may use one of the above rebate methods, or apply the rebate in a way that benefits employees.

FYI: The 80/20 rebate rules don’t apply when an insurance company has fewer than 1000 enrollees in a particular state or market.

Does this apply to my plan?

It depends.

For Rate Review: These requirements don’t apply to grandfathered plans. Check your plan’s materials or ask your employer or your benefits administrator to find out if your health plan is grandfathered.

For the 80/20 Rule: These rights apply to all individual, small group, and large group health plans, whether your plan is grandfathered or not.

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Refer, Like and Subscribe

***

***

MEDICAL LOSS RATIO: Defined

By A.I. and Staff Reporters

***

***

Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)

A basic financial measurement used in the Affordable Care Act to encourage health plans to provide value to enrollees.

MLR: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2022/07/30/health-insurance-medical-loss-ratios/

If an insurer uses 80 cents out of every premium dollar to pay its customers’ medical claims and activities that improve the quality of care, the company has a medical loss ratio of 80%. A medical loss ratio of 80% indicates that the insurer is using the remaining 20 cents of each premium dollar to pay overhead expenses, such as marketing, profits, salaries, administrative costs, and agent commissions.

The Affordable Care Act sets minimum medical loss ratios for different markets, as do some state laws.

MLR: https://medicalexecutivepost.com/2013/08/17/commercial-health-plans-medical-loss-ratio-2nd-quarter-2013/

COMMENTS APPRECIATED

EDUCATION: Books

Subscribe, Like and Refer

***

***

Blue Cross Blue Shield, Independent / Provider – Sponsored Plans

Join Our Mailing List

Transcripts and Slides

DougBy Douglas B. Sherlock, CFA sherlock@sherlockco.com

The Affordable Care Act is intended to create strong incentives to reduce the administrative costs of health insurers. The medical loss ratio rules and the new ACA-related taxes are manifestations of this policy, and the recent announced business combinations between leading national health insurers are adaptations to these incentives.

It follows that the most recent rate of increase in health plan administrative expenses, excluding the new taxes, is dramatically lower than in recent years. Sherlock Company materials summarizing the results of our surveys are found below.

Independent / Provider – Sponsored Plans

Blue Cross Blue Shield Plans

Assessment

The contents above are a very small portion of the 1,000 page Sherlock Benchmarks for each of these universes. The Sherlock Benchmarks are essential tools to manage administrative costs for your health plan.

budget

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

[Foreword Dr. Phillips MD JD MBA LLM] *** [Foreword Dr. Nash MD MBA FACP]

***

Health Plans Under Pressure to Deliver Affordable and High Quality Care

Join Our Mailing List

US Healthcare Expenditures Reaching Unsustainable Levels

[By Sam Muppalla]

Vice President: McKesson Health Solutions, Network Performance Management (NPM)

Expenditures on healthcare in the United States continue to increase and are rapidly reaching unsustainable levels. Pressures by businesses, households and the government to address these escalating costs and ensure high-quality healthcare are multiplying.

This is the first in a series of six essays that examine the challenges facing health plans and the ways that network design can unlock affordable care by aligning products, care models, and reimbursement.

Health insurance companies are faced with addressing a rapidly changing healthcare environment on multiple fronts. These changes are being driven by the goal of achieving a more affordable, higher quality healthcare system. Shifting market needs, increased regulatory initiatives, and a demand for administrative efficiency are requiring innovative approaches to unlocking affordable care. These pressures are originating from key healthcare stakeholders—employers, members and the government (Figure 1).

Employer Pressure

As the competition for the group insurance market increases, health plans need to respond to employer demands for products that deliver greater value. Delivering high value requires products which are tailored to the health of the employer’s specific population and emphasize wellness and prevention. An employer that can offer benefits and programs tailored to meet their employee needs can both improve their workforce productivity and optimize their healthcare spend. The employer’s insistence for reduction in premiums and decrease in the rate of premium growth is challenging health plans to develop more innovative strategies.

Consumer/Member Pressure

With the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA), the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates (Figure 2) that approximately 32 million more individuals will require access to healthcare services. This represents a significant increase in the number of new healthcare consumers at a time when health insurance companies are required to guarantee issue and re-newability of coverage. Steering this influx of new members to the right care teams will be a very critical core competency for health plans to develop. It is one of the few risk management tools left in the plan’s arsenal in a guaranteed access world. The growth of the individual market is also being accompanied by an increase in member financial responsibility. Members are increasingly demanding greater transparency into their provider quality, performance and cost information.

Government/Regulatory Pressure

Evolving healthcare regulation puts still more pressure on health plans. New regulations within the PPACA Section 9016, stipulate an 80% MLR cap for small groups (fewer than 100 lives) and an 85% Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) cap for large groups (more than 100 lives). These regulations also cap the percentage of revenues that can be earmarked for operational and administrative expenses at 15-20%. This poses a unique challenge for health plans; it requires plans to innovate in the areas of products, care models, and reimbursement designs without increasing the administrative and operational overhead.

There are roughly eighteen additional PPACA provisions that put further pressure on health plans by promoting increased collaboration (sections: 6301, 4201, 3027, 3011, 3021, 10333, 3022, 3024) and accountability (sections: 2705, 3006 & 10301, 3001, 3025, 2706, 2704, 3023, 3004, 3008 and 3002). The Bureau of National Affairs best summarized these provisions by stating,

“The comprehensive provisions in the act regarding payment and delivery reform reflect both the payment system continuum—from fee-for-service to bonus incentives for quality to bundled payments to partial and full global payments as well as the delivery system continuum—from independent clinicians and hospitals to small group practices to multi-provider networks to partially or virtually integrated organizations to fully integrated systems with common ownership and employment.”

These demands mean that health plans need to offer new high-value products that incorporate outcome-based reimbursement to drive quality outcomes and not pay for potentially avoidable costs.

According to studies by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Prometheus Payment (2009), “Up to 40 cents of every dollar spent on chronic conditions and 15 to 20 cents of every dollar spent on acute hospitalization and procedures are attributable to potentially avoidable complications (PACs).”

With evidence like this health plans are taking a new, hard look at when and how care is delivered.

Assessment

Next time, we’ll be looking at how health plans are responding to these challenges with innovations in products, care models, and reimbursement structures. Visit the blog next week for “The Three Levers of Innovation for Care Affordability.”

If you can’t wait, you can read the entire Unlocking Affordable Care by Aligning Products white paper now; it’s available on our website.

A Webinar 

On December 8th, we’ll be hosting a webinar on Lean Provider Lessons for Post Reform Success. Plan to attend this free webinar for more insights into designing for affordable high-quality care.

Channel Surfing the ME-P

Have you visited our other topic channels? Established to facilitate idea exchange and link our community together, the value of these topics is dependent upon your input. Please take a minute to visit. And, to prevent that annoying spam, we ask that you register. It is fast, free and secure.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details