Marcinko Predates Basu – Joins in on Promoting Same
[By Ann Miller; RN, MHA]
Executive Director
Editor’s Note:
We cut and pasted this verbatim anonymous comment, obtained from the trade magazine – Financial Advisor [FA] online – for its pointed charges important to the currently contentious topic of CFP mark status. Although emotional, and borderline abusive, it may represent more reality; than not.
The Letter
Liars and Frauds
Grossly Incompetent
Conveniently Stupid
Simply Unethical
The bulk of the commentary seems to focus on ethics and fiduciary duty to clients. It does not now, nor has ever existed. Fiduciary:
“As fiduciaries, financial planners must make fair and complete disclosure of all material facts and must employ reasonable care to avoid misleading their clients. The utmost good faith is required in all their dealings. Simply put, fiduciaries must exhibit the highest form of trust, fidelity and confidence, and are expected to act in the best interest of their clients at all times.”
As a fact, about 35 states require licensing that planners don’t want to hear about, never mind adhere to. California – with 8,000 CFPs – has only ONE that is fully licensed and legal to offer comprehensive fee services. Where is the outrage from CFP®s regarding this – and what the other 35 states demand?
A Conspiracy?
Nothing at all: The Board has actively engaged in a conspiracy of silence regarding such duty. NAPFA is a joke and always has been regarding high standards. Yet not one CFP® apparently even cares. That is being a fiduciary? It goes further. The UC system in California was also made aware of this deception more than a decade ago – yet did nothing. The illegal planners/instructors were left to “instruct and guide” new planners to the same level of illegality and fraud. You simply have a wholesale violation of integrity and honesty permeates the educational system and no one cares. I am not sure California Lutheran knows of the deception either. I doubt it. Does that make the lack of integrity and knowledge any the less worse? No.
You have to know what is required legally to perform a function. Every commentator would immediately notify regulators if a physician or attorney was practicing illegally. Yet; nothing here. Is this a double standard by CFPs etc, all to allow themselves a free pass from licensing? Sure.
Every officer, director and most staff members of the Board since Bob Goss has been aware of the fraud. All on formal written record since 1995, at the very least. Not one CFP® in this commentary venue has even bothered to address illegal and unethical activity- yet while extolling the virtues of the organization and themselves. What about the New Disciplinary Board Members? Are they not aware of the breach? If not, why not. Incompetency? If they do now, then why have they done nothing? Conveniently stupid – worse?
Steven Covey noted:
“Integrity means avoiding any communication that is deceptive, full of guile or beneath the dignity of people. A lie is any communication with intent to deceive. Whether we communicate with words or behavior, if we have integrity, our intent cannot be to deceive.”
FA is also aware of the lies and deception and at least has allowed this discussion. But to have further commentary from Board officers extolling the virtues of their standards and the highest integrity is disingenuous at best and a fraud at its worst.
Shame
Shame on all of you for not forcing the issue – of being a true fiduciary? But then again, worse yet, we have these same organizations and people deceptively going to Congress to instill this level of a breach of duty to the American public. Yet, hardly an outcry because the deception is so good and because members would benefit. So we have a benefit by deception.
“it is a lot easier to talk about your ethics than to live up to them.”
The standards might be fine. But who cares if they do not have to be adhered to. Is that not the real question?
Link http://www.fa-mag.com/online-extras/4064-weighing-the-cfp-mark-the-debate-continues.html
Assessment
Contrary to the above and CFP BoS requirements, the Certified Medical Planner program demands a college degree [with verifiable proof], a written and signed statement of legal fiduciary accountability at all times, and CEs consisting of a published dissertation, not mere annual lucre www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
The CMP™ Experience
Now, in as much as I am the ED for our CMP™ online program, I vet most applications. The prioritized reasons for matriculation rejection are: 1] unwillingness / inability to accept fiduciary status while blaming it on BDs, 2] lack of at least an undergraduate college degree, and 3] absolute “panic” regarding our writing and publication requirements.
Conclusion
Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:
LEXICONS: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
Filed under: "Advisors Only", Alerts Sign-Up, Breaking News, Career Development, Ethics, Financial Planning, Op-Editorials, Quality Initiatives, Research & Development | Tagged: Bob Goss, california lutheran university, CFA, CMP, CPA, david marcinko, financial advisor magazine, financial fiduciary, financial planner, MBA, NAPFA, PhD, Somnath Basu, Steven Covey | 22 Comments »















