Unsystematic Investing Risks

Join Our Mailing List

Understanding Company, Sector or Industry Risk

[By Julia O’Neal; MA, CPA]

fp-book1

Unsystematic risks are those associated with factors particular to the underlying company, sector or industry. 

Unsystematic risks are all risks that can be eliminated by diversification and are thus unrewarded.  

The Alpha Factor 

The residual nonmarket influences unique to each stock are measured by its alpha factor.

When one stock has a higher or lower rate of return than another stock with the same beta, this is said to be a result of its alpha factor.  If the physician-investor can pick enough stocks with positive alphas, the portfolio can be expected to perform better than its beta would have indicated for a given market movement. 

Diversification 

Unsystematic risk is reduced through diversification.  

As more stocks are added to a portfolio, the chance of obtaining a positive alpha, as well as the risk of getting a negative alpha, is diversified away. The volatility of the portfolio becomes much like the market itself.  

Assessment 

Therefore, a fully diversified portfolio – if there is such a thing – has a beta of 1.0 and an alpha of 0. Is your portfolio appropriately diversified; or is it di-worsified? 

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Product Details  Product Details

    

Systematic Securities Risks

Understanding Stock Market Risk

By Julia O’Neal; MA, CPA  

Systematic risk, also known as market risk, is that part of a security’s risk that is common to all securities of the same general class (e.g., stock or bonds) and is caused by economic, sociological, and political factors.

Systematic risk cannot be eliminated by the physician-investor through diversification in an investment class. 

Beta Co-efficient Measurement 

The measure of systematic risk in stocks is the beta coefficient. The beta coefficient is the covariance of a stock in relation to the rest of the stock market. It reflects the magnitude of the co-movement of the stock’s returns with those of the market.

Stock Market Proxy 

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index is generally used as a proxy for the market and has a beta coefficient of 1. Any stock with a higher beta is more volatile than the market. 

For example, a stock with a beta of 1.3 is 30% more volatile than the market (up and down), and any stock with a lower beta can be expected to rise and fall more slowly than the market. 

Investing Strategies 

Conservative physician-investors whose main concern is the preservation of capital should focus on low-beta stock.  Other doctors, more willing to take greater risks in an attempt to earn higher potential rewards, should include high-beta stock in their portfolios. 

Three Types of Systematic Risk 

Common to all assets are the following three systematic risk factors: 

  • Inflation or purchasing power risk,
  • Interest rate risk, and
  • Movements in the market in which a security is traded. 

Conclusion 

Are you willing to accept systematic, or stock market risk, in your investment portfolio; why or why not? 

More info: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759 

Individual: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790/ 

Institutional: www.HealthcareFinancials.com 

Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Investing Terms and Portfolio Design Definitions

A “Need-to-Know “ Glossary for all Medical Professionals

Staff Writers

nyse

Absolute volatility: The true volatility of an investment. 

Accumulation phase: A phase in an investor’s life when he or she is trying to accumulate an estate; usually characterized by growth-oriented investments.

Alpha factor: Measures the residual non-market influences that contribute to a securities risk unique to each security. 

Arithmetic mean: The sum of a set of numbers divided by the number of numbers in the set. 

Capital appreciation: The growth of an investment’s principal. 

Capital asset pricing model (CAPM): A model that uses beta and market return to help investors evaluate risk return trade-offs in investment decisions. 

Capital Market Line: Represents a spectrum of two-asset portfolios, moving from a portfolio invested in 100% of the least risky asset to a portfolio invested in 100% of the most risky one. The Capital Market Line is plotted on a graph with % return plotted on the Y-axis and risk (standard deviation) plotted on the X-axis. 

Co-movement: The degree to which an asset moves with other assets. 

Consolidation phase: A phase in an investor’s life when he or she generally shifts assets to more conservative or stable investments with the hope of preventing any major losses to accumulated assets. The investor is still interested in the growth of the investments. 

Covariance: The volatility of investments in relation to other investments. 

Current income: Income received from investments. 

Discount rate: The annual rate of return that could be earned currently on a similar investment; used when finding present value or opportunity cost. 

Earnings momentum investing: A style of investing that looks for companies that are on growth trends similar to a growth style. Two nuances differentiate these two styles: (1) the earnings momentum style focuses mainly on the growth of the earnings of the company and (2) the earnings momentum style looks for an accelerating increase in the growth of earnings. 

Efficient frontier: A line that represents the highest return for each particular mix of assets in a portfolio. 

Geometric mean: The Nth root of the product of “n” numbers. 

Growth investing: A style of investing that tries to outperform the market by investing in companies that are experiencing growth patterns in earnings, cash flows, sales, capitalization, etc. 

Market timing: Trying to predict the gains and declines of the market and then buying at market lows and selling at market highs. 

Mean rate of return: The return that is between two extreme returns. 

Modern portfolio theory: An approach to portfolio management that uses statistical measures to develop a portfolio plan. 

Negatively correlated: Two securities that move in opposite directions.

Nominal return: The return that an investment produces.

Periodic re-balancing: The act of shifting capital from asset classes that performed well to those that did not, in order to maintain a set ratio between asset classes. 

Positively correlated: Two securities that move in the same direction.

Probability distribution: A statistical tool used to show the dispersion around an expected result. 

Real return: The actual return after factors such as inflation and taxes are taken into consideration. 

Realized gain or loss: Gain or loss experienced by an investor during a period.

Regression analysis: A statistical tool used to measure the relationship between two or more variables. 

Relative efficiency: The belief that the markets reflect current information in their prices. 

Risk-averse: Describes a physician investor who requires greater return in exchange for taking on greater risk.

Sector rotation investing: A style of investing in which the goal is to out-perform the market by investing more heavily in the sectors that are forecasted to perform better than the market in expected economic scenarios.

Spending phase: The phase in an investor’s life when he or she is living on accumulated assets; generally characterized by a portfolio invested mainly in income-oriented investments, although a portion of growth is usually maintained.

Standard deviation: A statistical method used to measure the dispersion around an asset’s average or expected return and the most common single indicator of an asset’s risk. 

Unrealized gain or loss: A gain or loss on paper that is not realized until the investment is sold. 

Value investing: A style of investing that searches for undervalued companies and buys their stock in hopes of sharing in the future gain when other analysts discover the company.

Yield curve: A graph that represents the relationship between a bond’s term to maturity and its yield at a given point in time.

Yield to maturity: The fully compounded rate of return earned by an investor over the life of a bond, including interest income and price appreciation. 

Institutional info: www.HealthcareFinancials.com 

More terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com 

Note: Feel free to send in your own related terms and definitions so that this section may be updated continually in modern Wiki-like fashion.

    

Investment Policy Statement Construction

Join Our Mailing List

Developing a Sample IPS Document Template

 [By Clifton McIntire; CIMA, CFP®]

[By Lisa McIntire; CIMA, CFP®]fp-book

Here is an abbreviated sample Investment Policy Statement [IPS] template for a healthcare entity, clinic, private physician or hospital endowment account; posted by “Ask-a-Consultant” subscriber request. 

Introduction

An IPS typically contains the following sections, at a minimum. It may be a 5-15 page document for a single physician investor, or a 50-100 page tome for a hospital endowment fund.

Statement of Purpose

The purpose of this section is to guide and direct physician managers in the investment of hospital endowment funds. You want details about goals and objectives, as well as the performance measurement techniques that will be employed in evaluating the service rendered by the physician managers. 

Realizing that your overall objective is best accomplished by employing a variety of management styles, you will adjust your asset tolerances and permissible volatility to incorporate specific doctor-manager styles. 

Statement of Responsibilities

To achieve overall goals and objectives, you want to identify the parties associated with your accounts and the functions, responsibilities, and activities of each with respect to the management of fund assets. 

Physician managers or financial consultants [FC] are responsible for the daily investment management of Plan assets, including specific security selection and timing of purchases and sales. 

The custodian is responsible for safekeeping the securities, collections and disbursements and periodic accounting statements. The prompt credit of all dividends and interest to our accounts on payment date is required.  The custodian shall provide monthly account statements and reconcile account statements with manager summary account statements. 

The physician executive or financial consultant [FC] is also responsible for assisting us in developing the investment policy statement and for monitoring the overall performance of the Plan. 

Investment Goals and Objectives

The asset value of the funds, exclusive of contributions or withdrawals, should grow in the long-run and earn through a combination of investment income and capital appreciation a rate-of-return in excess of a specified market index for each investment style, while occurring less risk than such index. 

It is recognized that short-term fluctuations in the capital markets may result in a loss of capital on occasion, commonly expressed as negative rates of return. The amount of volatility and specific frequency of negative returns shall be detailed for each investment style. We will provide specific numeric targets by which we will measure whether or not objectives have been met.  

The investment policy of the Plan is based on the assumption that the volatility of the portfolio will be similar to that of the market.  A specific index or combination of indexes will be assigned to each manager based on the class of securities and style of selection to be employed. The physician consultant or FC will determine an overall index for volatility and asset allocation within the Plan as a whole.

It will be the duty of the physician or FC to monitor this section closely and advise us of necessary changes to comply with our overall policy. We expect that the accounts in total will meet or exceed the rate of return of a balanced market index comprised of the S&P 500 stock index, Lehman Brothers Government/Corporate Bond Index and U.S. treasury bills in similar proportion to our asset allocation policy. 

Recognizing that short-term market fluctuations may cause variations in the account performance, we expect the combined accounts to achieve the following objectives over a three-year moving time frame:   

  1. The account’s total expected return will exceed the increase in the Consumer Price Index by 7.0 percentage points annually.  Actual returns should exceed the expected returns about half the time.  Expected returns should exceed actual returns about half the time (i.e. if the CPI increases from 5.0 percent to 7.0 percent, then expected return should exceed 9 percent).
  2. The total annual return of the account is expected to exceed the average CPI for the year by an absolute of 3.0 percentage points (i.e. if the average CPI is 5.0 percent, then the expected annual return should exceed 8.0 percent).
  3. The average total expected return will exceed 10 percent annually. 

Suggested Performance Comparison Indexes

Style Index
Small Cap Growth Russell 2000 Growth
Medium Cap Value Russell Medium Cap Value
Small Cap Value Russell 2000 Value
Growth Russell 1000 Growth
Value Russell 1000 Value
Tax-Free Bonds Lehman Brothers Municipal
Taxable Bonds Lehman Brother Govt/Corp
Blended Account S&P 500/ Lehman Brothers Govt/Corp

Proxy Voting Policy

The physician manager or FC shall have the sole and exclusive right to vote any and all policies solicited in connection with securities held by us.

Trading and Execution Guidelines

Trading shall be done through a brokerage firm.  However, this request should in no way at any time affect the performance of accounts.

Instruction to execute transactions through a brokerage firm assumes that their service is equal to, and the rates are competitive with, other nationally recognized investment firms.

Additionally, it is understood that block transactions or participation in certain initial public offerings might not be available through a primary broker. In this case the manager should execute those trades through the broker offering the product and service necessary to best serve our account. 

Social Responsibility

No assets shall be invested in securities of any organization that does not meet the standard for socially and morally responsible investments we establish and communicated separately in writing to our physician investment manager. 

It is the responsibility of the physician or FC to maintain a list of such prohibited investments with us and to inform the respective managers of this list. 

Asset Mix Guidelines 

It shall be the policy of the foundation to have the assets invested in accordance with the maximum and minimum range for each asset category stated below.

This section applies to our overall account as monitored by the physician consultant.  Separate asset category guidelines will be provided for multiple physician managers, according to specified style and standard deviation tolerances.  

ASSET MINIMUM TARGET MAXIMUM REP
CLASS
WEIGHT
WEIGHT WEIGHT INDEX
         
Equities 50 60 70 S&P 500/FRC 2000 Index
Fixed Income 25 40 55 LB Muni/LBGC Inter
Cash & Equiv 0 0 30 90 Day Treasury

Portfolio Limitations

The following are general requirements of the account as a whole.  These specific limitations would be adjusted for a different medical manager or FC whose performance expectation would make it necessary for us to expand on our definitions. 

Equities: 

Equity securities shall mean common stock or equivalents (American Depository Receipts plus issues convertible into common stocks). 

Preferred stocks with the exception of convertible preferred share are considered part of the fixed income section. 

The equity portfolio shall be well diversified to avoid undo exposure to any single economic sector, industry group, or individual security. No more than 5 percent of the equity portfolio based on the market value shall be invested in securities of any one issue or corporation at the time of purchase. No more than 10 percent of the equity portfolio based on the market value shall be invested in any one industry at the time of purchase.

Capitalization/stocks must be of those corporations with a market capitalization exceeding $250,000,000. Common and convertible preferred stocks should be of good quality and listed on either the New York Stock Exchange [NYSE], American Stock Exchange [AMX] or in the NASDAQ System with requirements that such stocks have adequate market liquidity relative to the size of the investment. 

Fixed Income Investments: 

Types of securities of funds not invested in cash equivalents (securities maturing in one year or less) shall be invested entirely in marketable debt securities issued either by the United States Government or agency of the United States Government, domestic corporations, including industrial and utilities and domestic bank and other United States financial institutions.  

Quality: only fixed income securities that are rated BBB or better by Standard and Poor’s or Baa by Moody’s shall be purchased.  

Maturity: the maturity of individual fixed income securities purchased in the portfolio shall not exceed thirty years.

No more than 30 percent of the fixed income portion of the portfolio may be placed in these lower rated issues.  The average quality rating of the fixed income section shall be grade A; or better. 

Restricted Investments:  

Categories of securities that are not eligible without prior specific written approval of the physician investor, healthcare entity, clinic or hospital foundation include:     

  • Short Sales
  • Margin purchases or other use of lending or borrowed money
  • Private placements
  • Commodities
  • Foreign Securities
  • Unregistered or Restricted Stock
  • Options
  • Futures

Administration

The custodian will be responsible for settling trades executed by the physician manager in our accounts. From time to time, we will request disbursements from the accounts. Checks covering these requests must be mailed to us on the date of the request providing telephone notification is received before 2:00 pm; EST. 

Performance Review and Evaluation

 Performance results for the physician manager or FC will be measured on a quarterly basis. Total fund performance will be measured against a balanced index posed of commonly accepted benchmarks weighted to match the long-term asset allocation policy of the Plan.

Additionally the investment performances specific for individual portfolios will be measured against commonly accepted benchmarks applicable to that particular investment style and strategy.

The physician investor or FC will be responsible for complying with this section of our policy statement.  The managers or FCs shall report performance results in compliance with the standards established by AIMR (Association for Investment Management and Research); now the CFA Institute.  Reports shall be generated on a quarterly basis and delivered to us with a copy to us within four weeks of the end of the quarter. 

Communications 

Copies of all transactions will be maintained on a daily basis and will conform to our Investment Policy Statement. Monthly statements for each of the accounts will detail each transaction and summarize the account identifying unrealized and realized gains and losses. 

A formal meeting will be prepared quarterly by the consultant and delivered to us within six weeks from the end of the quarter.  The report will review past performance and evaluate the current investment outlook and discuss investment strategy of the physician manager.  These reports will compare the performance of the manager with the respective market benchmarks measuring return and volatility and compare the managers with their respective peer groups. 

Conclusion 

Of course, an IPS can include or exclude almost whatever you – or your institution’s governing board – may wish.

Finally, any professional financial manager or FC will be required to forward to you the SEC Form ADV Parts 1 and 2 annually, or at any interim point the ADV is substantially revised.

Remember to use a fiduciary financial consultant and/or physician-focused and/or appropriately degreed and/or licensed CPA, CFA, RIA or CMP™.  Investment results should never be guaranteed!

QUESTION: Does your hospital institution, medical practice, clinic or healthcare business entity have an ISP; more importantly – do you?  Please comment.  

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
FINANCE: Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
INSURANCE: Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors

Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners(TM)

Front Matter with Foreword by Jason Dyken MD MBA

logos

“BY DOCTORS – FOR DOCTORS – PEER REVIEWED – FIDUCIARY FOCUSED”

http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Constructing Your Personalized Portfolio

Self Portfolio Management

By Clifton McIntire; CIMA, CFP®

By Lisa McIntire; CIMA, CFP®fp-book

Most individual investment portfolios are simply a list of stocks.  Doctors with such lists usually know the cost of each position and when they acquired it. It is not unusual to find inherited low cost stocks in the account that have been held for many years. But, this list is not an investment portfolio. 

Introduction 

In order to self create and monitor an investment portfolio for personal, office, or medical foundation use, the physician investor should ask himself three questions: 

  1. How much do I have invested?
  2. How much did I make on my investments?
  3. How much risk did I take to get that rate of return?

Most doctors and health care professionals know how much money they have invested.  If they don’t, they can add a few statements together to obtain a total. Few actually know the rate of return achieved last year – or so far this year.  Everyone can get this number by simply subtracting the ending balance from the beginning balance and dividing the difference.  But few take the time to do it.  

Why? A typical response to the question is, “We’re doing fine.” But ask how much risk is in the portfolio and help is needed. Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz, Ph.D. said, “If you take more risk, you deserve more return.”  Using standard deviation, he referred to the “variability of returns;” in other words, how much the portfolio goes up and down; its volatility. How – and even whether or not – to create and manage your own portfolio is the topic of this essay. 

Creating the Portfolio 

First, you must determine what to do with your investments.  How much risk can be taken and what is the time frame?  You must understand the concept of risk vs. reward and write an investment policy statement [IPS].  Next, the assets that will be used for investment must be selected.  This involves asset allocation and mixing different styles of investment management to achieve the desired results, and is the point where you go it alone, or professional investment managers are selected.  Be sure to review expenses, like account and service fees, commissions and compares mutual funds with private money management. 

Once the initial portfolio is in place, the performance must be monitored to assure compliance with the investment policy.  Here’s where you consider 401k and 403b plans, pension plans, retirement accounts, as well as how to change doctor trustees or managers when necessary. 

Finally, consider the role of professional consultants. Now after all of this, if you still want to do it yourself rather than be a doctor, the entire process will be professionally outlined along with the steps taken to improve returns and reduce risk. 

The Investment Policy Statement

You would not think of starting to build a house without a set of construction drawings and detailed written specifications. An Investment Policy Statement (IPS) sets forth plans and specifications for the portfolio just like construction drawings and detailed written specifications tell the contractor how to build a house. The physician who writes the IPS is like the architect who draws up plans for a building.  Both must ask many questions to determine the wishes of the owner.  The same is true with a portfolio.   

Fred Rice, a Senior Vice President of Carolinas Physicians Network in Charlotte, North Carolina who writes medical institutional and foundation IPS documents explains,  “To me, the Investment Policy Statement is the most important investment document.  It must be a clear statement of precisely what you want your money to do for you.  Everyone involved; physicians, board members, money managers, administrators, investment consultants and beneficiaries of the trust must have a single clear statement of investment parameters.  There should be no misunderstanding of who is to do what and how they are supposed to do it with a properly written Investment Policy Statement.” 

Investment Policy Statements written for institutions or individuals has several component parts:                                               

  • Statement of Purpose
  • Statement of Responsibilities
  • Objectives and Goals
  • Guidelines
  • Performance Review
  • Communication

IPS Components 

First, discuss why you are writing the document and what you are trying to accomplish.  This is the Statement of Purpose. The Statement of Responsibilities identifies the parties associated with the portfolio and the functions, responsibilities and activities of each with respect to management of the assets. Then, establish some Objectives and Goals for risk tolerance and expected returns. Which assets (stocks, bonds, cash, international, emerging markets, etc) will you use?  What return do you desire net after inflation? Net after taxes?  Net after fees and commissions? Now, what direction can you give to the selection of securities? In the Guidelines section, you need to identify specific securities or types of securities that you want to use in the portfolio and which are to be excluded. Discuss benchmarks, the use of margin, foreign stocks, short selling, futures trading, etc. The Performance Review section involves how to measure performance, what benchmark we will use and how we will critique management performance. 

Finally, you want to deal with procedures for Reporting and Communications. Quarterly reports are usually required. You will need to make a complete performance measurement and analysis. In reality, the solo dentist’s written IPS can be as simple as a single page. For a hospital, it can be an elaborate, detailed and multi-paged tome. 

Stock Purchases and Inheritance 

Purchased stocks have a definite cost basis; it is what it is. But, when you inherit securities, a new cost basis is established (the price of the stock on the date of death or six months later—the executor of the estate makes this determination). Even though there would be no capital gain liability if the stock were sold immediately after date of death, most people simply don’t do anything, just hold the stock.  

Taxes

Of course taxes should be considered when selling securities but the investment merit should be the overriding factor. 

Mr. L. Eddie Dutton, CPA says, “First make an investment decision and if it fits into the tax plan, so much the better.  Doctors often wonder where they will get the money to pay the taxes.  We say to get it from the sale of the appreciated stock.  Cry all the way to the bank with your profit.” 

Dr. Ernest Duty, a very successful private investor advises “Ask yourself this question: If you had the money instead of the stock, would you buy the stock?  If your answer is ‘Yes’ then, hold on to the stock but if you say ‘No, I wouldn’t buy that stock today, then sell it.” 

Arranging by Industry Sector

Take the list of your of stocks, and arrange them according to sector to see which sectors are overweighed or under weighted. Using the S&P 500 as our benchmark, you see that there are 500 stocks in the average, sorted into 89 industries and 11 economic sectors. Let’s just settle for 10 of the 11 economic sectors since the “transportation” sector is very small and we do not have enough money to buy into all 89 industries, let alone each of the 500 companies. This is not a handicap since you would not want to own all the stocks or industries, even if you could. 

Now, let’s make some decisions on how to weight our portfolio among the sectors. Do not forget cash (money market fund) so that if it there is a market correction we can be proactive buyers. This is known as “target” weighting.

Portfolio Diversification 

It has been determined that somewhere between 22 and 30 positions are necessary to achieve proper diversification.  After you pass 30, you are just adding names. There is little benefit to diversification beyond 30 positions. We want to reduce risk. There are two types of risk related to investing in stocks: systematic and unsystematic.

Systematic risk is inherent in the market itself.  Market risk describes the phenomena that all securities tend to move up when the market moves up and down when the market goes down.  As an example, assume Ben Bernanke, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, unexpectedly announces an increase in interest rates of .25 percent, the market would fall and that includes most stocks. There is very little that we can do about systematic risk. Diversification does not help. The Fidelity Magellan Mutual Fund, with 890 different issues, certainly one of the most diversified portfolios, fell 31 percent in the 60 days following the correction of October 1987. 

Unsystematic risk however, is more company specific and can be reduced.  This is risk associated exclusively with a particular company.  GM autoworkers go out on strike – again. Phillip Morris loses a big lawsuit unexpectedly.  Cisco’s routers are oversold. Intel expects PC sales to drop.  A promising new Google technology bombs, etc. Any event that is only to affect a single company presents unsystematic risk. We can diversify away unsystematic risk to the point where it will not have a major impact on our portfolio.  A good rule of thumb is “No more than 10 percent in any one industry (note that we said industry, there are 89 industries versus 11 sectors) and no more than 5 percent in anyone stock initially.  Theoretically you would have 20 stocks with 5 percent in each but when a single position appreciated to the point where it was 10 percent of your holdings, you would begin to sell off portions to reduce your exposure in that single issue.   

Portfolio Time Frame 

Successful physician investors have, without exception, a long-range philosophy. We asked one such physician “old-timer” to name the best investment he ever made. He replied, “Jefferson Pilot. It just kept going up, increasing the dividend and splitting the stock over and over again. During the forty years that I owned Jefferson Pilot, it was a real good performer. There was one ten-year period when it did absolutely nothing, flatter than a pancake, but other than that it did beautifully.”  Very few doctors are willing to hold on for ten years; very few of have done as well. They were also never “married” to the stock. To them it was an investment not a person, a belief, a creed, or anything of more value than the latest stock quotation. But they did their homework. They bought the stock as if they were buying the whole company. They liked the management, industry, products, and potential; never just because someone else thought it was a good idea. 

Selecting the Assets

Asset allocation is the most important decision you will make in effecting your total return in keeping with your risk tolerance.  It has been said that over 90 percent of the variability of returns come from asset allocation. This is a hard concept to grasp.  Most doctors believe that picking the right stocks (those that go up fast) is all that is necessary to be successful.  That certainly would make you successful but it just isn’t that simple. Over an extended period of time, if stocks go up and you own a diversified portfolio of stocks, your portfolio will most likely be worth more. If on the other hand, bonds go up (and stocks go down) your portfolio will most likely be worth less. A combination of asset classes is the better way to go.  That is why professional money managers spend so much time and money on the subject of asset allocation. 

Periodically, the “C” section in the Wall Street Journal illustrates various asset allocation models proposed by major brokerage firms. These firms are attempting to forecast the best asset mix going forward. The same information is easily found on the Internet. Most asset allocation models and studies illustrate historical data giving various combinations of asset classes that can best satisfy your investment risk and return objectives. Basic asset allocation assigns a percentage weighting to stocks, bonds, cash, and international stocks.  A more elaborate proposal would include various classes of these four main categories. 

Types of Stocks 

Stocks can be broken down into small, mid and large capitalization. Value and growth styles are also used to diversify the mix.  Bonds can be of varying quality and maturity as well as corporate, government, and municipal. The first thing to realize about asset allocation is that it can reduce risk. Most healthcare professionals would initially assume that a portfolio made up of 100 percent U.S. Government bonds would be as stable as it gets. Yet, the lowest standard deviation (risk) is actually 80 percent bonds and 20 percent stocks.

Adding “international” stocks to a portfolio made up of exclusively U.S. investments also reduces our standard deviation over a long period of time. There is a feeling among doctors that international stocks are risky. By themselves they are a more volatile asset class but they have historically had a very low correlation to domestic stocks and therefore, over time will reduce overall volatility. 

Correlation Co-Efficients

Correlation is used in reference to assets selected for use in the portfolio; and can be statistically represented in co-efficient statistics.  Low “correlation” means that when one asset class goes up 50 percent, the other asset class goes up by a lesser amount, let us say 10 percent.  Inverse “correlation” means two asset classes go in different directions (when one goes up, the other goes down).  You want to have a group of assets that have low, or in some cases, even inverse “correlation” to reduce the volatility of the account. Note that historically, the “most favored asset class” often changes from year to year.  Therefore, asset allocation is the most important investment decision you will make. 

Whither Self-Management? 

If you elect to mange your own portfolio, you are going to be competing with the best investment talent in the world.  Like physicians, many investment professionals have studied and practiced for years to attain the level of competence they enjoy. They have been educated in some of the finest schools in the world and initially practiced under the tutelage of the most successful in the profession. And, they are making the decision to buy only after listening to extensive presentations from analysts who not only read most of what is published on the company, but personally visited the management as well as the companies’ banker, insurance people, union, and competitors. 

Assessment 

Investing and managing your own portfolio, the pension plan of your office, or the endowment fund of your hospital is serious business. It should not be a hobby. You need the best advice you can obtain, because mistakes may not be discovered until it is too late. 

Conclusion 

Remember, when considering money management, be sure to understand the ultimate fiscal consequences and your own personal liability; and going forward – be sure to tell us how you do?

Note: For related info: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

When to Change Money Managers?

Join Our Mailing List

The Money Managers

By Clifton N. McIntire, Jr.; CIMA, CFP®

By Lisa Ellen McIntire; CIMA, CFP®

Sometimes even the best made plans just don’t work out. Despite extensive time and energy spent on due diligence before hiring an investment manager, it becomes evident that the doctor must change managers. 

Here are a few thoughts when considering a change:

 § You should have initially hired the manager with a long-term relationship in mind. Realizing that styles go in and out of favor, we were not simply buying last quarter’s best numbers. 

§ Market statistics often mask “real” performance of money managers, both good and bad. The S&P 500’s 1998 performance can be attributed to a few very large companies. 

§ Generally, a full market cycle would be required to assess money manager performance. 

Having said that, what could happen that would warrant changing managers? 

· Style Drift: You have a growth manager and when growth stocks turn down, you begin to see the purchase of “value” stocks.

· Not Sticking to Previously Established Disciplines: If the process is to sell if the price declines 20 percent down from the original buy range and now they are holding because, “This time, it is different.” 

· Personnel Changes: New analysts are hired with a different philosophy. Recent transactions seem 180 degrees off course.

·  Principals Leave: Like professional sports figures, good money managers are in demand and sometimes change firms. The replacement may be a 27-year-old MBA with little experience. 

· The Firm is Sold: This may be good new if it broadens ownership and helps retain good people. Look for long-term incentive driven “staying” bonus plans.

· Loss of Major Accounts:  Reduced revenues may force cut backs in personnel and services. Attention may shift from portfolio management to marketing.

Finally, sometimes the relationaship is just not working. Misjudgments in asset allocation and poor stock selection over a reasonable period of time can be reason enough for a doctor to change managers.

***

231_1

***

Assessment

Do you use a money manager or self direct your own portfolio? Have you ever needed to change you money manger? 

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

***

Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

***

Guide to Risk-Adjusted Market Performance

What isn’t Measured – Isn’t Improved

By Jeffrey S. Coons; PhD, CFA

By Christopher J. Cummings; CFA, CFP™ 

Join Our Mailing List

Market performance measurement, like physician quality improvement reports, is an important feedback loop to monitor progress towards the goals of the medical professional’s investment program. 

Performance comparisons to market indices and/or peer groups are a useful part of this feedback loop, as long as they are considered in the context of the market environment and with the limitations of market index and manager database construction. 

Introduction

Inherent to performance comparisons is the reality that portfolios taking greater risk will tend to out-perform less risky investments during bullish phases of a market cycle, but are also more likely to under-perform during the bearish phase.  The reason for focusing on performance comparisons over a full market cycle is that the phases biasing results in favor of higher risk approaches can be balanced with less favorable environments for aggressive approaches to lessen/eliminate those biases. 

Can we eliminate the biases of the market environment by adjusting performance for the risk assumed by the portfolio?  While several interesting calculations have been developed to measure risk-adjusted performance, the unfortunate answer is that the biases of the market environment still tend to have an impact even after adjusting returns for various measures of risk. 

However, medical professionals and their advisors will have many different risk-adjusted return statistics presented to them, so understanding the Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, Jensen’s measure or alpha, Morningstar star ratings, etc. and their limitations should help to improve the decisions made from the performance measurement feedback loop. 

[a] The Treynor Ratio

The Treynor ratio, named after MPT researcher Jack Treynor, identifies returns above or below the securities market line. It measures the excess return achieved over the risk free return per unit of systematic risk as identified by beta to the market portfolio.  In practice, the Treynor ratio is often calculated using the T-Bill return for the risk-free return and the S&P 500 for the market portfolio. 

[b] The Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio, named after CAPM pioneer William F. Sharpe, was originally formulated by substituting the standard deviation of portfolio returns (i.e., systematic plus unsystematic risk) in the place of beta of the Treynor ratio.  A fully diversified portfolio with no unsystematic risk will have a Sharpe ratio equal to its Treynor ratio, while a less diversified portfolio may have significantly different Sharpe and Treynor ratios. 

[c] Jensen Alpha Measure

The Jensen measure, named after CAPM research Michael C. Jensen, takes advantage of the Capital Asset Pricing Model to identify a statistically significant excess return or alpha of a diverse portfolio.   

However, if a portfolio has been able to consistently add value above the excess return expected as a result of its beta, then the alpha (ap) should be positive and (hopefully) statistically significant.

Thus, alpha from a regression of the portfolio’s returns versus the market portfolio (i.e., typically the S&P 500 in practice) is a measure of risk-adjusted performance.  

Now, how do you measure the success or failure of your portfolio?

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

Product Details  Product Details

Are Capital Markets Efficient?

Join Our Mailing List

What is the Efficient Market Hypothesis?

[By Jeffrey S. Coons; PhD, CFA]

[By Christopher J. Cummings; CFA, CFP™]fp-book1

The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) states that securities are fairly priced based on information about their underlying cash flows and that physician investors should not expect to consistently outperform the market over the long-term. 

 EMH Types 

There are three distinct forms of EMH that vary by the type of information that is reflected in a security’s price:

·  Weak Form: This form holds that investors will not be able to use historical data to earn superior returns on a consistent basis.  In other words, the financial markets price securities in a manner that fully reflects all information contained in past prices.

·  Semi-Strong Form: This form asserts that security prices fully reflect all publicly available information. Therefore, investors cannot consistently earn above normal returns based solely on publicly available information, such as earnings, dividend, and sales data.

·  Strong Form: This form states that the financial markets price securities such that, all information (public and non-public) is fully reflected in the securities price; investors should not expect to earn superior returns on a consistent basis, no matter what insight or research they may bring to the table. 

While a rich literature has been established regarding to test whether EMH actually applies in any of its three forms in real world markets – probably the most difficult evidence to overcome for backers of EMH is the existence of a vibrant money management and mutual fund industry charging value-added fees for their services. 

In fact, no less than Warren Buffett has suggested that the markets are decidedly not efficient. 

Assessment

And so, while there has been a growing move towards index funds – as well as ETFs – the strength of the money management industry may reflect investor’s concern with risk management and asset allocation – as much as any view that a manager or individual can “beat the market.”   

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

LEXICONS: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
PODIATRISTS: www.PodiatryPrep.com
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com

Product Details  Product Details

Invite Dr. Marcinko

***

The Arbitrage Pricing Theory [APT]

Join Our Mailing List

A Multi-Faceted Representation of Systematic Risk

  • By Jeffrey S. Coons; PhD, CFA
  • By Christopher J. Cummings; CFA, CFP™

fp-book2Introduction 

Did you know that the economist Stephen Ross PhD developed a more generalized Modern Portfolio Theory [MPT] model called Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)? 

Definition

APT is based upon somewhat less restrictive assumptions than the Capital Asset Pricing Model [CAP-M] and results in the conclusion that there are multiple factors representing systematic risk.  The APT incorporates the fact that different securities react in varying degrees to unexpected changes in systematic factors other than just beta to the market portfolio.

The risk-free return plus the expected return for exposure to each source of systematic risk times the beta coefficient to that risk is what determines the expected rate of return for a given security.

Physician-Investors

An important point for physicians to keep in mind is that the APT focuses on unexpected changes for its systematic risk factors. The financial markets are viewed as a discounting mechanism, with prices established for various securities reflecting investors’ expectations about the future, so any excess return for an expected change will be arbitraged away (i.e., the price of that risk will be bid down to zero). 

For example, market prices already reflect physician and other investors’ expectations about GNP growth, so prices of assets should only react to the extent that GNP growth either exceeds or falls short of expectations (i.e., an unexpected change in GNP growth).

A Rhetorical Interrogative?

And so – we can ask – why do lay investors, medical professionals and their advisors go wrong in making passive asset allocation decisions using MPT?   The problem has less to do with the limitations of CAPM or APT as theories and more to do with how these theories are applied in the real world.

The basic premise behind the various MPT models is that both return and risk measures are the expectations assessed by the investor.   Too often, however, decisions are made based on what investors see in their rear view mirror rather than what lies on the road ahead of them.

Theoretical?

In other words, while modern portfolio theory is geared towards assessing expected future returns and risk, investors and financial professionals all too often simply rely on historical data rather than develop a forecast of expected future returns and risks.

While it is clearly difficult for physicians and all investors to accurately forecast future returns or betas, whether they are for the market as a whole or an individual security, there is no reason to believe that simply using historical data will be any more accurate.  

MPT Shortcomings

One major shortcoming of modern portfolio theory as it is commonly applied today is the fact that historical relationships between different securities are unstable.  And, it would seem that a physician or other healthcare provider should not rely on historical averages to establish a passive asset allocation.  

Of course, the use of unstable historical returns in modern portfolio theories clearly violates the rule-of-thumb related to the dangers of projecting forward historical averages; MPT is nonetheless an important concept for medical professionals to understand as a result of its frequent use by investment professionals. 

Critical Elements of Investing

Furthermore, MPT has helped focus investors on two extremely critical elements of investing that are central to successful investment strategies: 

  1. First, MPT offers the first framework for investors to build a diversified portfolio.   
  2. Second, the important conclusion that can be drawn from MPT is that diversification does in fact help reduce portfolio risk.

Assessment

MPT approaches are generally consistent with the first investment rule of thumb, “understand and diversify risk to the extent possible.”  

Additionally, the risk/return tradeoff (i.e., higher returns are generally consistent with higher risk) central to MPT based strategies has helped investors recognize that if it looks too good to be true, it probably is. 

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Risk Management, Liability Insurance, and Asset Protection Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™8Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

***

CAPM – Another Portfolio Pricing Model to Consider

Join Our Mailing List

The Capital Asset Pricing Model

By Jeffrey S. Coons; PhD, CFA

By Christopher J. Cummings; CFA, CFP™

While Dr. Harry Markowitz is credited with developing the framework for constructing investment portfolios based on the risk-return tradeoff, William Sharpe, John Lintner, and Jan Mossin are credited with developing the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). 

Introduction

CAPM is an economic model based upon the idea that there is a single portfolio representing all investments (i.e., the market portfolio) at the point of the optimal portfolio on the CML and a single source of systematic risk, beta, to that market portfolio.   The resulting conclusion is that there should be a “fair” return physician investors should expect to receive given the level of risk (beta) they are willing to assume. 

Thus, the excess return, or return above the risk-free rate, that may be expected from an asset is equal to the risk-free return plus the excess return of the market portfolio times the sensitivity of the asset’s excess return to the market portfolio excess return.

Beta then, is a measure of the sensitivity of an asset’s returns to the market as a whole.  A particular security’s beta depends on the volatility of the individual security’s returns relative to the volatility of the market’s returns, as well as the correlation between the security’s returns and the markets returns. 

Thus, while a stock may have significantly greater volatility than the market, if that stock’s returns are not highly correlated with the returns of the overall market (i.e., the stock’s returns are independent of the overall market’s returns) then the stock’s beta would be relatively low.

A beta in excess of 1.0 implies that the security is more exposed to systematic risk than the overall market portfolio, and likewise, a beta of less 1.0 means that the security has less exposure to systematic risk than the overall market.

The CAPM uses beta to determine the Security Market Line or SML.  The SML determines the required or expected rate of return given the security’s exposure to systematic risk, the risk-free rate, and the expected return for the market as a whole. The SML is similar in concept to the Capital Market Line, although there is a key difference. 

Both concepts capture the relationship between risk and expected returns.

However, the measure of risk used in determining the CML is standard deviation, whereas the measure of risk used in determining the SML is beta.  

Conclusion 

The CML estimates the potential return for a diversified portfolio relative to an aggregate measure of risk (i.e., standard deviation), while the SML estimates the return of a single security relative to its exposure to systematic risk. 

Now, if this is the essence of the Capital Asset Pricing Model, what are the arguments against CAPM?

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

  Risk Management, Liability Insurance, and Asset Protection Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™8Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

***

Understanding Modern Portfolio Theory

Portfolio Management 

By Jeffrey S. Coons; PhD, CFA

By Christopher J. Cummings; CFA, CFP™

Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) is the basic economic model that establishes a linear relationship between the return and risk of an investment.  The tools of MPT are used as the basis for the passive asset mix, which involves setting a static mix of various types of investments or asset classes and rebalancing to that allocation target on a periodic basis.  

Introduction

According to MPT, when building a diversified investment portfolio, the goal should be to obtain the highest expected return for a given level of risk.  A key assumption underlying modern portfolio theory is that higher risk generally translates to higher expected returns.

From the perspective of MPT, risk is defined simply as the variability of an investment’s returns.  While MPT is based upon the idea that expected volatility of returns is used, risk is measured by standard deviation of historical returns in practice. 

Standard deviation is a measure of the dispersion of a security’s returns, X1,…,Xn, around its mean (or average) return.   

Often, standard deviation is calculated using monthly or quarterly data points, but is represented as an annualized number to correspond with annualized returns of various investments.  

Now, let us assume Stock A has a mean return of 10.0 percent and a standard deviation of 7.5 percent. 

Then, approximately 68 percent of Stock A’s returns are within one standard deviation of the mean return, and 95 percent of Stock A’s returns are within 2 standard deviations.

In other words, 68 percent of Stock A’s returns should be between 2.5 percent and 17.5 percent, and 95 percent of the returns for Stock A should be between negative 5.0 percent and 25.0 percent. 

However, a key assumption underlying this logic is that the returns for Stock A are normally distributed (i.e., including that the distribution curve of Stock A’s returns is symmetrical around the mean).

Unfortunately, in reality security returns may not be symmetrically distributed and both the mean return and standard deviation of returns may shift dramatically over time. 

Sources of Risk 

There are many different sources of risk, but the two forms of risk hypothesized by Harry Markowitz Ph.D., father of MPT, were systematic risk and unsystematic risk.

Systematic risk is sometimes referred to as non-diversifiable risk, since it affects the returns on all investments.  

In alternate theories like the Capital Asset Pricing Model [CAPM], systematic risk is defined as sensitivity to the overall market. While Arbitrage Pricing Theory has several common macroeconomic and market factors that are considered sources of systematic risk.   

Investors are generally unable to diversify systematic risk, since they cannot reduce their portfolio’s exposure to systematic risk by increasing the number of securities in their portfolio. 

In contrast, physicians diversifying an investment portfolio can reduce unsystematic risk, or the risk specific to a particular investment.  Sources of unsystematic risk include a stock’s company-specific risk and industry risk. 

For example, in addition to the risk of a falling stock market, physician investors in Merck also are exposed to risks unique to the pharmaceutical industry (e.g., healthcare reform), as well as the risks specific to Merck’s business practices (e.g., success of research and development efforts, patent time frames, etc). 

Assessment

A physician investor can reduce unsystematic risk by building a portfolio of securities from numerous industries, countries, and even asset classes.  

Thus, portfolio risk in MPT refers to the both systematic (non-diversifiable) and non-systematic (diversifiable) risk, but a basic conclusion of MPT is that no investor would be rational to take on non-systematic risk since this risk can be diversified away.

Conclusion 

MPT is the philosophy that higher returns correspond to higher risk, and that doctor investors typically desire to earn the highest return per a given level of risk.

The tradeoff between expected return and volatility of returns to make investment decisions is known as the mean-variance framework and is central concept in many of today’s passive asset allocation portfolio management principles. 

Now, is MPT as viable today – as when it was originally proposed?

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed

And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Risk Management, Liability Insurance, and Asset Protection Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™8Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

****

Diversification and Portfolio Management

Join Our Mailing List

What is Financial Asset Allocation?

By Jeffrey S. Coons; Ph.D, CFA

By Christopher J. Cummings; CFA, CFP™ 

Once the risk management goals and objectives for a physician’s financial portfolio have been identified and prioritized, the next step is to build a mix of investments that will best balance those conflicting goals.   

Asset allocation is defined as the portfolio’s mix between different types of investments, such as stocks, bonds, and cash.  The goal of any asset allocation should be to provide a level of diversification for the portfolio, while also balancing the goals of growth and preservation of capital required to meet the medical professional’s objectives.

Establishing the appropriate asset allocation for a physician investor’s portfolio is widely considered the most important factor in determining whether or not he/she meets his/her investment objectives.  In fact, academic studies have determined that more than 90 percent of a portfolio’s return can be attributed to the asset allocation decision.  

So, how do physician investors and their advisors typically make asset allocation decisions? 

One method is best characterized as a passive approach, in which a set mix of stocks, bonds and cash is maintained based on their historical risk/return tradeoff.  The alternative is an active approach, in which the mix among various asset classes is established based upon the current and expected future market and economic environment. 

In addition to pursuing a passive investment strategy, such as indexing, medical professionals supporting the notion that market prices accurately reflect all available information generally are not concerned with the timing of their investment decision.  

The most frequently used strategy to avoid a market timing decision when establishing an initial allocation to stocks is referred to as dollar cost averaging. Dollar cost averaging entails investing the same amount of money at regular intervals.

For example, an investor who wishes to dollar cost average may decide to invest 1/24 of the allocation on the first of each month for two years rather than investing the full amount immediately or trying to time buys when stocks are trading at a low point.

Value-cost averaging does the same thing with the same number of shares, rather than dollar amount, for its regular intervals.

Now, what is your personal favorite strategy?

Product Details

Product Details

 Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

The Financial Services Industry Explained

Join Our Mailing List

Financial Services Sales Professionals   

By: Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA, CMP™ 

[Publisher-in-Chief]

DEM 2013It has been said that there are more than 95 financial services designations in the business; and most are suspect credentials. A college degree may not even be required for most of them. 

And, the quest to find true guidance is clothed in mystery and subterfuge in the business. 

Why? It’s because the industry promotes a low standard of care, known as “suitability”; when a much higher fiduciary standard – to work on behalf of the client like a physician – should be required. 

If you don’t believe me, just look in the classified ad section of your local newspaper under “sales positions”, for job listings for these folks.  

So, when you select any type adviser, get this fiduciary standard-of-care statement in writing.  Just think of the “golden rule”, as you ponder these traditional credentials. 

What is an Insurance Agent? 

No one, especially doctors, likes to pay life and disability insurance premiums. Inadequate coverage, however, can completely devastate your family or medical practice, by quickly wiping out a lifetime of asset accumulation and business equity.

Buying and maintaining the right amount and type of coverage from solid insurance companies at a reasonable price eliminates these risks in a very efficient manner.  Unfortunately, an essential and relatively simple concept like risk transfer has evolved into an area that makes many doctors downright queasy.

The easiest way to handle this issue is to get consensus agreement from a core team of financial advisors as to the amount and types of coverage.

Once that is accomplished, appropriate insurance agents can be contacted.  The agents should be captive agents with insurance companies with policies known to be good for the coverage in question. Otherwise, independent agents with access to a large number of companies and products can be contacted.

Regardless, in addition to the usual questioning regarding competence and a background check, the agent should be aware that the core team will review all proposals.  Proposals should include what is known as a ledger statement.

A Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) as granted by the American College, or Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC), are two valid insurance designations demonstrating a focused expertise in the insurance business.  But, these still are typically commission sales agents who work for their respective firms, or themselves, but not necessarily you. The saying goes “insurance is sold not bought.”

As a reformed insurance agent myself, I sold all sorts of personal and other business insurance, too.  

Some years ago, the American Society of CLU and ChFC, in Bryn Mawr, Pa., reconsidered its own strategy of insurance as the organization changed its name to the Society of Financial Services Professionals to appeal to a broader base of financial practitioners beyond the insurance products it traditionally provided. 

What is a Stock Broker [Registered Representative]? 

A full service retail or discount stock broker, regardless of compensation schedule, is also known as a registered representative. Other names include financial advisor, financial consultant, financial planner, Vice President, etc. Nevertheless, they are still stock-brokers and not fiduciaries. 

Typically, the national test known as a Series #7 (General Securities License) examination and state specific Series #63 license is needed, along with Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) registration through the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) to become a stockbroker.  The industry touts them as rigorous; they are not as I passed mine after studying for a weekend. Since a commission may be involved – and performance based incentives are allowed – always be aware of costs.  

Again, regardless, of nomenclature derivative, the goal of these folks is to sell financial products; and earn a commission or fee. You also typically sign away your right to litigate when you enter into a brokerage contract. 

What is a Registered Investment Advisor?

This securities license, obtained after passing the easy Series # 65 examination, allows the designee to charge for giving unbiased securities advice on retirement plans and portfolio management, although not necessarily sell securities or insurance products. 

An RIA, or RIA representative, is usually a fiduciary, and should work for the interest of the client. A registered-representative, financial consultant, Certified Financial Planner™, or stockbroker does not necessarily have to be. 

What is a Certified Financial Planner™? 

Some believe that the premier personal financial planning designation of choice for the Financial Planning Association (FPA) – originally located in Atlanta, then Denver and now Washington, DC and founded in 1969 – is board Certification in Financial Planning.  This independent, designation represents a person who has completed a 24 month course of study at an accredited institution and passed the two day, comprehensive Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Examination. This test encompasses all aspects of the financial planning process, including insurance, economic principles, taxation, investments and retirement benefits planning. 

An ethics, continuing education and confidentiality requirement is also mandated for this designation [www.FPANet.org].  But, be warned however, a CFP is not necessarily a fiduciary and does not have to act on your behalf, or with your best interests in mind.  

And, conflicts of interest do not necessarily have to be disclosed. There is much dissention in the industry regarding this situation, as I remain a former-reformed Certified Financial Planner™.

Still, the association’s marketing clout is powerful.

What is a Chartered Financial Analyst™? 

A Chartered Financial Analysis™ will usually work for a brokerage house and follow one or a few publicly traded companies. CFA analysts may manage institutional money or run a mutual fund and have ethics requirements.  This is a tough standard. I experienced it first-hand in business school. 

Unfortunately, the previously unbiased nature of some Wall Street experts has been questioned lately with the collapse of such stocks as HealthSouth and others.  Some authorities now feel that analysts have become merely promoters of the followed company, since sell recommendations are rarely made and CFAs or non-CFAs may cozy up to insiders and corporate executives as they curry their favor.

Contact the Association for Investment Management and Research (www.AIMR.org); now [www.CFAInstitute.org]. 

Q: Why is knowledge of the above important to physician-investors?

A: To avoid being ripped off!

Don’t believe me? Recall the tale of Dr. Debasis Kanjilal, a pediatrician from New York who put more than $500,000 into the dot.com company, InfoSpace, a few years ago, upon the advice of Merrill Lynch’s star analyst Henry Bloget. Is it any wonder that when the company crashed, the analyst was sued, and Merrill settled out of court? Other analysts, such as Mary Meeker of Morgan Stanley, Dean Witter and Jack Grubman from Salomon Smith Barney, are involved in similar fiascos.  Remember; forewarned is forearmed

8 Things your Financial Planner Won’t Tell You: http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/RetirementandWills/CreateaPlan/8ThingsYourFinancialPlannerWontTellYou

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details