By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd
***
***
A Comparative Essay
Retirement planning is a cornerstone of financial security, and employers often provide structured plans to help employees prepare for the future. Two prominent options are Defined Benefit (DB) Plans and Cash Balance Plans. While both fall under the umbrella of employer-sponsored retirement programs, they differ significantly in design, funding, and how benefits are communicated to participants. Understanding these distinctions is essential for employers deciding which plan to offer and for employees evaluating their retirement prospects.
Defined Benefit Plans
A Defined Benefit Plan is the traditional pension model. It promises employees a specific retirement benefit, usually calculated based on a formula that considers salary history, years of service, and age at retirement. For example, a plan might provide 2% of the employee’s final average salary multiplied by years of service.
Key Features:
- Employer Responsibility: The employer bears the investment risk and is obligated to deliver the promised benefit regardless of market performance.
- Predictable Income: Employees receive a guaranteed monthly payment for life, often with survivor benefits.
- Funding Requirements: Employers must contribute enough to meet actuarial obligations, which can be costly and complex.
- Decline in Popularity: Due to high costs and liabilities, DB plans have become less common in the private sector, though they remain prevalent in government and unionized workplaces.
Advantages for Employees:
- Security of lifetime income.
- No need to manage investments directly.
- Often includes inflation adjustments or survivor benefits.
Challenges for Employers:
- Heavy funding obligations.
- Sensitivity to interest rates and market fluctuations.
- Long-term liabilities that can strain balance sheets.
Cash Balance Plans
***
***
A Cash Balance Plan is technically a type of Defined Benefit Plan but operates more like a hybrid between DB and Defined Contribution (DC) plans. Instead of promising a monthly pension, the plan defines benefits in terms of a hypothetical account balance. Each year, the employer credits the account with a “pay credit” (a percentage of salary or a flat dollar amount) and an “interest credit” (either a fixed rate or tied to an index).
Key Features:
- Account-Based Presentation: Employees see a notional account balance that grows annually, making benefits easier to understand.
- Employer Responsibility: The employer still manages investments and guarantees the interest credit, meaning the investment risk remains with the employer.
- Portability: Benefits can often be rolled into an IRA or another retirement plan if the employee leaves the company.
- Popularity Among Professionals: Cash Balance Plans are increasingly used by small businesses and professional practices (like medical or law firms) to allow higher contributions and tax deferrals.
Advantages for Employees:
- Transparent account balance that feels similar to a 401(k).
- Portability of benefits upon job change.
- Potential for larger accumulations, especially for high earners.
Challenges for Employers:
- Still responsible for funding and guaranteeing returns.
- Requires actuarial oversight and compliance with pension regulations.
- Can be complex to administer compared to pure DC plans.
Comparison
While both plans are employer-funded and fall under defined benefit rules, their differences are notable:
| Aspect | Defined Benefit Plan | Cash Balance Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit Format | Lifetime monthly pension | Hypothetical account balance |
| Risk | Employer bears investment risk | Employer bears investment risk |
| Employee Perception | Complex, formula-based | Simple, account-based |
| Portability | Limited | High (can roll over) |
| Popularity | Declining in private sector | Growing among small businesses/professionals |
Conclusion
Defined Benefit Plans and Cash Balance Plans represent two approaches to retirement security. The former emphasizes guaranteed lifetime income, offering stability but imposing heavy obligations on employers. The latter modernizes the pension concept by presenting benefits as account balances, improving transparency and portability while still requiring employer guarantees. For employees, Cash Balance Plans often feel more tangible and flexible, while Defined Benefit Plans provide unmatched security. For employers, the choice depends on balancing cost, risk, and workforce needs. Ultimately, both plans underscore the importance of structured retirement savings and highlight the evolving landscape of employer-sponsored benefits.
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
SPEAKING: Dr. Marcinko will be speaking and lecturing, signing and opining, teaching and preaching, storming and performing at many locations throughout the USA this year! His tour of witty and serious pontifications may be scheduled on a planned or ad-hoc basis; for public or private meetings and gatherings; formally, informally, or over lunch or dinner. All medical societies, financial advisory firms or Broker-Dealers are encouraged to submit an RFP for speaking engagements: CONTACT: Ann Miller RN MHA at MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com -OR- http://www.MarcinkoAssociates.com
Like, Refer and Subscribe
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", Accounting, finance, Glossary Terms, Investing, Marcinko Associates, Retirement and Benefits, Taxation, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: cash value, CBP, david marcinko, DB, DC, defined benefit, pension plans, retirement plans, traditional pension plan, washington-dc | Leave a comment »














