• Member Statistics

    • 827,496 Colleagues-to-Date [Sponsored by a generous R&D grant from iMBA, Inc.]
  • David E. Marcinko [Editor-in-Chief]

    As a former Dean and appointed University Professor and Endowed Department Chair, Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA was a NYSE broker and investment banker for a decade who was respected for his unique perspectives, balanced contrarian thinking and measured judgment to influence key decision makers in strategic education, health economics, finance, investing and public policy management.

    Dr. Marcinko is originally from Loyola University MD, Temple University in Philadelphia and the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center in PA; as well as Oglethorpe University and Emory University in Georgia, the Atlanta Hospital & Medical Center; Kellogg-Keller Graduate School of Business and Management in Chicago, and the Aachen City University Hospital, Koln-Germany. He became one of the most innovative global thought leaders in medical business entrepreneurship today by leveraging and adding value with strategies to grow revenues and EBITDA while reducing non-essential expenditures and improving dated operational in-efficiencies.

    Professor David Marcinko was a board certified surgical fellow, hospital medical staff President, public and population health advocate, and Chief Executive & Education Officer with more than 425 published papers; 5,150 op-ed pieces and over 135+ domestic / international presentations to his credit; including the top ten [10] biggest drug, DME and pharmaceutical companies and financial services firms in the nation. He is also a best-selling Amazon author with 30 published academic text books in four languages [National Institute of Health, Library of Congress and Library of Medicine].

    Dr. David E. Marcinko is past Editor-in-Chief of the prestigious “Journal of Health Care Finance”, and a former Certified Financial Planner® who was named “Health Economist of the Year” in 2010. He is a Federal and State court approved expert witness featured in hundreds of peer reviewed medical, business, economics trade journals and publications [AMA, ADA, APMA, AAOS, Physicians Practice, Investment Advisor, Physician’s Money Digest and MD News] etc.

    Later, Dr. Marcinko was a vital and recruited BOD  member of several innovative companies like Physicians Nexus, First Global Financial Advisors and the Physician Services Group Inc; as well as mentor and coach for Deloitte-Touche and other start-up firms in Silicon Valley, CA.

    As a state licensed life, P&C and health insurance agent; and dual SEC registered investment advisor and representative, Marcinko was Founding Dean of the fiduciary and niche focused CERTIFIED MEDICAL PLANNER® chartered professional designation education program; as well as Chief Editor of the three print format HEALTH DICTIONARY SERIES® and online Wiki Project.

    Dr. David E. Marcinko’s professional memberships included: ASHE, AHIMA, ACHE, ACME, ACPE, MGMA, FMMA, FPA and HIMSS. He was a MSFT Beta tester, Google Scholar, “H” Index favorite and one of LinkedIn’s “Top Cited Voices”.

    Marcinko is “ex-officio” and R&D Scholar-on-Sabbatical for iMBA, Inc. who was recently appointed to the MedBlob® [military encrypted medical data warehouse and health information exchange] Advisory Board.



  • ME-P Information & Content Channels

  • ME-P Archives Silo [2006 – 2020]

  • Ann Miller RN MHA [Managing Editor]

    USNews.com, Reuters.com,
    News Alloy.com,
    and Congress.org

    Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners(TM)

    Product Details

    Product Details

    Product Details


    New "Self-Directed" Study Option SinceJanuary 1st, 2020
  • Most Recent ME-Ps

  • PodiatryPrep.org

    Lower Extremity Trauma
    [Click on Image to Enlarge]

  • ME-P Free Advertising Consultation

    The “Medical Executive-Post” is about connecting doctors, health care executives and modern consulting advisors. It’s about free-enterprise, business, practice, policy, personal financial planning and wealth building capitalism. We have an attitude that’s independent, outspoken, intelligent and so Next-Gen; often edgy, usually controversial. And, our consultants “got fly”, just like U. Read it! Write it! Post it! “Medical Executive-Post”. Call or email us for your FREE advertising and sales consultation TODAY [770.448.0769]

    Product Details

    Product Details

  • Medical & Surgical e-Consent Forms

  • iMBA R&D Services

    Commission a Subject Matter Expert Report [$2500-$9999]January 1st, 2020
    Medical Clinic Valuations * Endowment Fund Management * Health Capital Formation * Investment Policy Statement Analysis * Provider Contracting & Negotiations * Marketplace Competition * Revenue Cycle Enhancements; and more! HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
  • iMBA Inc., OFFICES

    Suite #5901 Wilbanks Drive, Norcross, Georgia, 30092 USA [1.770.448.0769]. Our location is real and we are now virtually enabled to assist new long distance clients and out-of-town colleagues.

  • ME-P Publishing


    If you want the opportunity to work with leading health care industry insiders, innovators and watchers, the “ME-P” may be right for you? We are unbiased and operate at the nexus of theoretical and applied R&D. Collaborate with us and you’ll put your brand in front of a smart & tightly focused demographic; one at the forefront of our emerging healthcare free marketplace of informed and professional “movers and shakers.” Our Ad Rate Card is available upon request [770-448-0769].

  • Reader Comments, Quips, Opinions, News & Updates

  • Start-Up Advice for Businesses, DRs and Entrepreneurs

    ImageProxy “Providing Management, Financial and Business Solutions for Modernity”
  • Up-Trending ME-Ps

  • Capitalism and Free Enterprise Advocacy

    Whether you’re a mature CXO, physician or start-up entrepreneur in need of management, financial, HR or business planning information on free markets and competition, the "Medical Executive-Post” is the online place to meet for Capitalism 2.0 collaboration. Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds. THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
  • OIG Fraud Warnings

    Beware of health insurance marketplace scams OIG's Most Wanted Fugitives at oig.hhs.gov

No More 10 and 90 Day Global Periods

Join Our Mailing List

New Changes on the [CMS Payment Reform] Horizon
[By Dreama Sloan-Kelly MD CCS]

thDid you hear about the changes that are coming down the pike in regards to global services when billing for surgical procedures — be they in the office, in an ambulatory surgical center, or in the hospital?

CMS released their final 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) ruling late last year. Embedded in this document was a proposal by CMS to get rid of both the 10 day and 90 day global periods! In fact, they want to do away with global period billing all together and have all procedures paid based on the work required to do the procedure itself — thereby billing for all post-surgical visits separately using E/M codes.

According to the final ruling, CMS proposes to transform all 10 day global services to ZERO global days starting in 2017. They will do the same in regards to 90 day global services starting in 2018. And, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Office of Inspector General (OIG) they have “identified a number of surgical procedures that include more visits in the global period than are being furnished”. They go on to say that they are “also concerned that post-surgical visits are valued higher than visits that were furnished and billed separately by other physicians such as general internists or family physicians”. Based on the final ruling, they plan to begin the transition as previously stated in 2017 after they have considered all comments.

The ruling goes on to state, “as the agency begins revaluation of services as 0-day global periods, we will actively assess whether there is a better construction of a bundled payment for surgical services that incentivizes care coordination and care redesign across an episode of care”. So let’s talk reality and my take on this change.

Over the past few weeks I have read a lot of articles on this subject from various pundits in the industry — they are actually arguing that this change will mean increased reimbursement when you combine the separate payment for the procedure itself along with the visit by visit billing for the post-surgical follow up care when compared to the current reimbursement rate.




Personally, I think they are all wrong for the following reasons:

Procedure Reimbursement Amount: This is the wild card. They are going to use the same RVU system that has always been used to calculate payment — but I guarantee you the payment for the procedure will not be anywhere near the reimbursement for the global package. I think the closest we could get to estimating the reimbursement rate of the procedure is to figure out what the current surgical care only rate would be (ie. as if you appended Modifier 54 to the procedure code). Beware that this rate would still encompass the pre-surgical evaluation — which I am assuming would be carved out since that is a part of the current global package they are trying to phase out.

Post Op Visits: Getting a patient to comply with medical visits is hard enough — now adding in the fact they would have to pay a copay each time — most often a specialty co-pay is going to make it even harder. Patient’s understand their follow up visits are currently covered in the cost for the surgery, and hence they tend to show up to these visits knowing they do not have any out of pocket expenses. If the proposed change comes to fruition many of the post-surgical visits may become cost prohibitive for a lot of patients and actually lead to a decrease in the number of follow up visits the patient actually schedules. Once the patient starts to feel better their motivation to return dwindles.

Lower Reimbursement Rate for Post-Surgical Visits: It is clearly stated in the CMS ruling that it is felt the post-surgical follow up care visits are paid at a higher rate than what a regular E/M visit would be paid for had the patient been seen by a primary care provider or an internist. That simple statement confirms to me that when the new procedure rate is combined with the individual visit payment rate, the overall reimbursement rate will be less than what is currently being paid.

So, how do you prepare?

First, stay on top of all bulletins coming from CMS in regards to this issue. Most of your medical societies and/or specialty societies have taken clear positions in regards to this matter — so be sure to stay in the loop and become a part of the process.

Run a report that allows you to pinpoint the average number of post-surgical follow up visits for your most billed procedures. This will give you an idea of the average number of follow up visits for particular procedures you know you will bill for if this transition does occur. Does this mean this number will be exact — NO — I would factor in a decrease of 15-20% for visits across the board based on the dynamics I previously described.

Lastly, begin creating a policy in regards to post-surgical follow up care that can act as an education tool for the patient, teaching them the important benefits of being compliant with their post-surgical care schedule and also warning them about the possible increase in out of pocket cost. Being transparent can go a long way into easing patient’s fear and encouraging their follow through.

As always I have included documentation for your library of information — you can find the CMS 2015 MPFS final ruling fact sheet HERE! I also created a brief video presentation on this hot topic HERE



Channel Surfing the ME-P

Have you visited our other topic channels? Established to facilitate idea exchange and link our community together, the value of these topics is dependent upon your input. Please take a minute to visit. And, to prevent that annoying spam, we ask that you register. It is fast, free and secure.


Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com


Product Details

%d bloggers like this: