A Next-Gen -or- Last-Gen National Model
[By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™]
[By Staff Reporters]
Beware; all Medicare and other private health insurance recipients.
Why?
On December 4, 2008, and according to Robert E. Moffit PhD, the Director of the Center for Health Policy Studies [CHPS] at The Heritage Foundation, Presidential Obama proposed the creation of an institute that would judge the “comparative effectiveness” of medical treatments, procedures, and therapies, as well as drugs, devices, and technologies.
Congressional FRB Model
This Congressional Federal Health Board [FHB] would be modeled on the Federal Reserve Board [FRB] with a governing body of politically appointed experts, but “insulated from politics” and possess many powers similar to the proposed National Health Board [NHB], a key feature of the ill-fated Health Security Act [HSA] of 1993.
New Health Board
This new health board would also:
- Set the rules for health insurers who would participate in a national health insurance exchange and recommend benefits coverage, including drugs and medical procedures backed by “solid evidence”;
- “Rank” therapies and medical services based on their cost effectiveness;
- Suggest priorities for medical research; and
- “Align incentives with the provision of quality care,” as defined by the health board, through Medicare-style “pay for performance” rules for doctors and other medical professionals who comply with government practice guidelines.
Assessment
For ordinary Americans unsatisfied with the new Federal Health Board, there would be little recourse since it would likely be independent of Congress and the White House. For medical providers, according to Hope Hetico; RN, MHA of this Medical Executive-Post, it would be an operational nightmare that makes the managed care logistical problems of condition coverage, pre-certifications and pre-treatment authorizations, etc., seem a non-issue.
In other words, is this new FHB really the next-generation of medical collaboration and communication vis-a-vie health 2.0; or just another bloated last-generation command control model?
Link: http://www.heritage.org/research/healthcare/wm2155.cfm
Conclusion
Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:
- DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
- PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
- PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
- HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
- CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
- ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
- BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
- FINANCE:Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
- INSURANCE:Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors
Filed under: Ethics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Managed Care, Military Medicine, Quality Initiatives | 3 Comments »
















