Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds.
THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
Prior Imaging-Authorization Suggested
Staff Reporters
As reported in the Wall Street Journal, on July 14, 2008, Medicare may be soon requiring prior authorization to curtail unnecessary utilization of CT scans, MRIs and other forms of medical imaging, a new Government Accounting Office [GAO] report suggests.
The Medicare Report
To cut imaging costs, Medicare has been reducing certain physician payments, sifting through its data to spot improper claims, and educating medical practitioners about the issue. But, the GAO reported that post-payment claims review alone is inadequate to manage medical imaging – one of the fastest growing parts of Medicare – and suggests that Medicare include prior authorization as a possible front-end tactic.
The Findings
The GAO pointed to new evidence of imaging overuse in physician practices, including:
- The proportion of Medicare spending on in-office imaging rose from 58 percent to 64 percent from 2000 to 2006.
- Imaging became an increasingly large slice of doctors’ revenue pie. For example, cardiologists got 36 percent of their total Medicare revenue from in-office imaging in 2006, compared with 23 percent in 2000.
- In-office imaging spending per Medicare patient varied widely nationwide in 2006, from $62 in Vermont to $472 in Florida.
Assessment
What might proponents of the classic Dartmouth Study on healthcare quality say about these findings?
Conclusion
Please comment on the above; opinions from health economists, actuaries and our radiology colleagues are especially welcomed.
Speaker:If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
Subscribe Now:Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Copyright 2008 iMBA Inc: All rights reserved, USA, unless otherwise noted. Use is restricted to Medical Executive-Post subscribers only. No redistribution is allowed. To avoid violation of iMBA Inc copyright restrictions and redistribution policy, please register for your own free Medical Executive-Post membership. Detailed information and registration links are available at:
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Referrals: Thank you in advance for your electronic referrals to the Medical Executive-Post.
Share this:
Filed under: Career Development, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Insurance Matters, Managed Care, Practice Management, Quality Initiatives, Surveys and Voting | Tagged: GAO, radiology | 2 Comments »
The Leading Business Education Network for Doctors, Financial Advisors and Health Industry Consultants 