Is Medicine Still a Sovereign Profession? [A Voting Opinion Poll]

The Social Transformation of American Medicine

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA CMP™

Historical Review, Book Excerpts and ME-P Survey for Modernity

Join Our Mailing List 

The Social Transformation of American Medicine [The rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry].

This classic book was written by Paul Starr in 1984. I first read it while in business school back in 1994-96. Here is an excerpt from pages 227 and 232. It is even more relevant for the healthcare industrial complex today.

Quoting Kenneth Arrow PhD

The structural features Arrow[*] discusses have a history. He writes that when the market fails, “society” will make adjustments. […] But, modern day economists like Austin Frakt PhD and others, have to ask: For whom did the market fail, and how did “society” make these adjustments?

Of Failed Markets

The competitive market was failing no one more than the medical profession, and it was the profession that organized to change it. […]. By the 1920s, the medical profession had successfully resolved the most difficult problems confronting it as late as 1900. It had […] won stronger licensing laws; turned hospitals, drug manufacturers and public health from threats to its position into bulwarks of support; and checked the entry into health services of corporations and mutual societies. It has succeeded in controlling the development of technology, organizational forms, and the division of labor. In short, it had helped shape the medical system so that its structure supported professional sovereignty instead of undermining it.

Master over Diseases

Over the next few decades, the advent of antibiotics and other advances gave physicians increased mastery of disease and confirmed confidence in their judgment and skill. The chief threat to the sovereignty of the profession was the result of this success. So valuable did medical care appear that to withhold it seemed deeply unjust. Yet as the felt need for medical care rose, so did its cost, beyond what many families could afford. Some agency to spread the cost was unavoidable. It would have to be a third party, and yet this was exactly what physicians feared. The struggle of the profession to maintain its autonomy then became a campaign of resistance not only to programs of reform but also to the very expectations and hopes that the progress of medicine was constantly arousing. To continue to escape the corporation and the state meant preserving a system that was at war with itself.

Notes: Arrow, Kenneth J. “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care.” American Economic Review 53 (December 1963), pp. 941–73. Dr. Arrow is my favorite health economist and indeed father of the profession*.

Link: 1963Arrow_AER

The Opinion Poll [Please Vote]

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Is Medicine Still a Sovereign Profession? Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com and http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko 

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

Retail Medical Clinics and IT

Join Our Mailing List

Competitive HIT Issues Emerging by Default

[By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA CMP™]

Publisher-in-Chief

dem2

Health entities of the Physician Practice Management Corporation [PPMC] era might be termed the originators of corporate medicine despite contentious legal policies and prohibitions. Since then, there have been other modifications to the business model, as those PPMCs left for dead by the year 1999 made a modest comeback thru 2003-04.

They did so by evolving from first generation multi-specialty national concerns, to second generation regional single specialty groups, to third generation regional concerns, and finally to fourth generation Internet enabled service companies, providing both business-to-business [B2B] solutions to affiliated medical practices, as well as business-to-consumer [B2C] health solutions to plan members.  

Prior machinations were ambulatory surgery centers [ASCs] and out-patient treatment centers [OPTCs], while the newer twists are specialty owned hospitals.

Social Transformation of Medicine 

And so, I believe that Paul Starr, author of the Pulitzer-prize-winning book “The Social Transformation of American Medicine” who first predicted healthcare corporatization was more correct, than not.

But, his vision was early in the evolutionary game. And, while corporate medicine seems inevitable in 2008 and beyond, the marketplace is still struggling for the correct business mode. It needs something that bridges the gap between medical professionalism and ROI.

The Balancing Act 

In-other-words, a better balancing act is needed. Slowly, like capitalism itself, the pendulum will swing back and forth between paucity and excess, until a point is reached where all concerned are moderately satisfied, ethical, and marginally profitable; while delivering quality medical care that is more needed by the citizenry-many [i.e., more pediatricians, internists, primary care doctors, OB-GYNs, nurse-practitioners, PAs, etc]; than the vital-few [neuro-surgeons, pediatric endocrinologists, super specialists, etc].

Maybe this “missing balance link” is the retail medical clinic model.

Retail Clinics 

As most doctors, payers, patients and consumers are aware, the retail quick-service medical care concept has found a familiar place in national chains such as Target, Wal-Mart and CVS, where pharmacies and patients already exist, and space is inexpensive and abundant.

These clinics are typically staffed by nurse practitioners and offer a limited menu of walk-in medical services with insurance co-payments between $10 and $30. And, unlike some physician practices, private pay patients are welcomed with fees ranging from $55 to $85 cash in many parts of the country!  Prescription drugs are nearby at robust generic discounts, or even for free in some cases. Office hours are extended, and convenience reigns.

HIT Issues by Default? 

Ironically, as one positive side-effect of this innovative next-gen corporate practice model, may be the goading of late adopting, tight-fisted and/or refusing MD-niks to enter into the modern health-information-technology [HIT] age.

Thus, one way to get margin compressed private medical practices up and running with electronic medical records [EMRs] may be these same retail clinics.

***

doctor-37707_640

***

Projected Growth of the Retail Industry 

Today, more than 800 retail clinics are open for business, and analysts predict that 85 percent of the U.S. population will have a clinic within five miles of home in five years. And, the number of retail health clinics is expected to multiply in 2009; as recently reported by the Washington Times

Illustration

Now, ponder the current state of affairs where a retail clinic [say Walgreen’s, etc] treats a vacationing patient for $65; who then receives the medical-record instantly on a flash-drive or securely uploaded to some virtual storage facility?

Just how will that patient’s premium priced private practitioner back-home explain his/her lack of EMR technology, and ages-old anchor to the hand-written paper-based medical records of yore?

Can you say Dossia.org, HealthVault.com, etc?

Competitive Assessment 

The ideological leap from technical buffoonery – to clinical distrust – will not be great in the minds of the modern, intelligent, educated and insightful patients that we all crave.

Assessment

Of course, one wonders how long will it take for EMRs to become a strategic competitive advantage for early adopting physicians. Will late adopters even survive as EMTs become main-stream?    

Channel Surfing the ME-P

Have you visited our other topic channels? Established to facilitate idea exchange and link our community together, the value of these topics is dependent upon your input. Please take a minute to visit. And, to prevent that annoying spam, we ask that you register. It is fast, free and secure.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details