Stressors Affecting all Stakeholders
[By Robert James Cimsai; MHA, AVA, ASA, CMP™]
The changes in reimbursement for Medicare services through the introduction of prospective payment systems and physician reimbursement cuts for professional services, as well as the increased focus on patient quality and transparency initiatives and health 2.0 collaboration have forced healthcare providers to look for more efficient ways to provide services, as well as additional sources of revenue and margin-producing business.
Additionally, with the rise of corporate healthcare provider networks and health systems, together with rising healthcare costs, competition among providers has become prevalent in the healthcare industry.
Assessment
Strict control of reimbursement costs from payers and consistent decreases in physician professional component fee reimbursement yields; reduction in traditional hospital inpatient use; and higher costs of capital have all contributed to the trend of physician investment in outpatient (and inpatient) specialty provider enterprises [ASCs, specialty hospitals and clinics, etc] , which often compete with general acute care community hospital providers.
Conclusion
Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:
- DICTIONARIES: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
- PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
- PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
- HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
- CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
- ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
- BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
- FINANCE:Financial Planning for Physicians and Advisors
- INSURANCE:Risk Management and Insurance Strategies for Physicians and Advisors
Filed under: Career Development, Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance, Practice Management | Tagged: health 2.0, health 2.0 collaboration, healthcare competition, HMO, IPA, Managed Care, MC, medicare, next generation healthcare, participatory medicine, PPO, PPS, prospective payment system, Robert Cimasi, www.healthcarefinancials.com |














More
For more or moral hazard, competitive tension and health insurance costs, vist this link:
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/06/moral-hazard-and-whether-patients-should-consider-cost-in-their-health-care-decisions.html
Elizabeth
LikeLike
The free-market system
In a free-market system, competition is generally a good thing. It can lead to improved quality, better efficiencies, and eventually lower costs. It has been documented that physician-owned hospitals can increase patient satisfaction while reducing complications and mortality.
Unfortunately as it is currently structured, the healthcare system in the US is not based upon free market concepts. After millions of dollars are invested in facilities to provide needed services in a competitive manner, the viability of these facilities can be negotiated away by politicians and other interest groups. This problem is illustrated in the current healthcare debate in Washington
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090727/REG/907249983
As part of the “cost saving measures” being proposed, limitations and restrictions are being considered which may eventually lead to the demise of these facilities. Investments in facilities, technology, and services can be made instantly obsolete by changes in Medicare reimbursement. This makes it difficult for those investing in healthcare to maintain a long-term point of view for patients and for communities. Another example, in my experience, was the growth of home health services a few years ago. Medicare cutbacks in reimbursement caused these needed services to be decreased, and patient care suffered.
Brian J. Knabe; MD CFP CMP™
LikeLike
Dr. Knabe,
And, the competition keeps coming … Recall one Rick Scott, formerly of the HCA debacle, who now runs a chain of convenient care clinics.
Howard
LikeLike
Collaboration Among Organizations
Bob – Well done! Another way to decrease competitive tensions and improve the healthcare operations management function is to obtain better information by collaborating with other organizations in gathering information.
Most operational failures result from breakdowns in the supply of materials and information across organizational boundaries. Better capacity decisions can often be made in collaboration with other institutions.
For example, emergency rooms often take collaborative approaches and use Internet technology to regulate ambulance traffic to emergency rooms. Some metropolitan areas share information concerning accessibility and efficiency of care on a regular basis. The sharing of information facilitates benchmarking that leads to improved performance for the community.
Hospitals can also benefit from involvement in community-based quality improvement initiatives.
For example, community hospitals can collaborate with their competitors and members of the business community to share information that leads to the identification of opportunities to improve performance, the delivery of root-cause analysis, and the development of process measures that facilitate change. Working with other organizations and employers in the community can not only lower costs, but also improve population health.
Dr. David E. Marcinko
http://www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
LikeLike
Barriers and Tensions
Communication will not remove all barriers to success. However, it is an important part of all successful endeavors.
Too often meetings are held to discuss problems which would never arise if we communicate effectively and held fewer meetings!
Leroy Howard MA CMP™ candidate
http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
LikeLike
Escalating tensions in healthcare
Yesterday, I shared a link to an article titled “Feds push electronic records that make fraud easier,” by Jayne O’Donnell, USA TODAY, July 6, 2014.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/07/06/electronic-health-records-medicare-healthcare-fraud-funding/12157645/
O’Donnell described CMS’ planned increased use of contractors like EHR consultant Reed Gelzer to provide increased oversight against provider fraud – rumored to be on the increase. Gelzer tells USA TODAY that the best way to stop physicians from committing fraud will be to spur better accuracy and reliability with more funding for regulation and enforcement. He adds, “Investigators I’ve spoken with say that the only constraint on more recoveries is more resources.”
Today, providers’ honor was defended by study results revealed in an article titled, “Electronic health records don’t increase Medicare fraud, study finds.” No byline, Healthcanal.com, July 8, 2014.
http://www.healthcanal.com/public-health-safety/52845-electronic-health-records-don%E2%80%99t-increase-medicare-fraud,-study-finds.html
Healthcanal: “Despite widespread stories and concerns among policymakers about the potential for electronic health records to increase fraudulent billing, the authors found that adopters and non-adopters increased their billing to Medicare at essentially identical rates. They found the same results among the groups of hospitals most likely to use electronic health records to increase coding and revenue.”
Are we witnessing the inevitable escalation of force between CMS and physicians over the purpose of EHRs? If so, my money is on the physicians.
HHS Secretaries cannot remove gall stones.
D. Kellus Pruitt DDS
LikeLike