Update on the Estate Tax for MDs and Us All

Senate Refuses Repeal

By Children’s Home Society of Florida Foundation

Join Our Mailing List

On July 21, 2010, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) offered an amendment to the unemployment bill that would repeal the estate tax. Sen. DeMint noted that the White House is creating a difficult environment for “small businesses that are already facing higher income taxes and higher investment taxes.”

The Proposal

The proposed amendment was defeated on a vote of 39-59. Democratic Senators Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Ben Nelson (D-NE) supported the abolition of the estate tax. Republican Senators Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Susan Collins (R-ME) and George Voinovich (R-OH) opposed the abolition of estate tax.

Assessment

Sen. Lincoln and Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) continue to advocate an estate tax compromise. Under the compromise, the $3.5 million exemption from 2009 would be increased over 10 years to $5 million and the top 45% estate tax rate would be reduced to 35% over that same time frame.

[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=tax&iid=5237623″ src=”http://view4.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/5237623/tax-dollars/tax-dollars.jpg?size=500&imageId=5237623″ width=”346″ height=”491″ /]

Editor’s Note: The political pressure on the Senate continues to rise. Following the March death of Houston oilman Dan Duncan with a $9 billion estate, the news media noted that the government had lost $2 to $3 billion on that estate alone. When New York Yankees owner George Steinbrenner passed away with an estimated $1.1 billion estate, news media suggested that he hit a “home run” by dying in 2010 with no estate tax. While action is not likely before the election, there now seem to be two general patterns to a potential Senate compromise. First, the estate tax exemption will start at $3.5 million and increase to a higher number over ten years. Second, the estate tax rate will begin at 45% and decrease again over that same decade. The House majority has held strongly to a $3.5 million exemption and 45% top tax rate, so the final compromise would also need to reflect their preferences.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Will Fiscal Commission Consider a VAT to Reduce the Federal Deficit?

Moro on the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform

By Robert Giese
bob.giese@chsfl.org

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform [NCFRR] continues to develop a comprehensive proposal to address the federal deficit. It has invited comments from members of Congress, leaders of all types of American organizations and private individuals.

We invite ME-P contributions, as well.

A Four- Point Proposal

James Q. Riordan, Sr. sent a letter this week to co-chair Alan K. Simpson, the former Senator from Wyoming. Mr. Riordan made four basic points about the fiscal problems and suggested a Value Added Tax (VAT) as a solution.

[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=National+Commission+on+Fiscal+Responsibility+and+R&iid=8643885″ src=”8/6/7/2/Obama_Speaks_On_32c4.jpg?adImageId=13115540&imageId=8643885″ width=”380″ height=”536″ /]

First, he indicated that there is too much “unaffordable spending.” Even with limited spending growth, the income tax cannot be sufficiently increased to pay for current and future proposed spending without doing damage to the economy and increasing unemploymen.

Second, Riordan claims that the only potential solution is a VAT. However, because the VAT is a tax on consumption and would have great impact on middle and lower incomes, it needs to be accompanied by a progressive income tax.

His third point is that the new income tax would need to be very simple. In his view, there would be no deductions for home mortgage interest, charitable gifts or medical expenses.

Fourth, he would tax all income only once. There would presumably not be a corporate-level tax or an estate tax under this theory.

Inadequate Staff Resources

As the fiscal commission considers the options for reducing spending and increasing taxes, it has indicated that the current staff resources are inadequate. In response to a request by the commission, Senate Majority Reid sent a letter this week to the White House and requested additional staff support. The White House indicated that it will be pleased to “work with him” to provide additional assistance.

At a hearing on the financial challenges, Senator George Voinovich (R-OH) noted that the commission is under great pressure to develop an effective plan. He stated, “If we don’t get something out of that commission, we are over the cliff.”

Assessment

Senate Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (D-ND) was the prime supporter of the commission. He stated, “This is not a time to impose austerity in my judgment.” However, he indicated that austerity will be necessary in the future, and that budget cuts and tax increases “must be imposed in a way that is convincing.”

Editors Note: For now, we take no specific position on VAT or other tax and spending recommendations by the Fiscal Commission. This information is offered because potential Fiscal Commission plans may affect many of our ME-P physician readers, subscribers, consultants and advisors.

Join Our Mailing List

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe. It is fast, free and secure.

Get our Widget: Get this widget!

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise