Annuities and their Associated Costs

Another Look at Expenses

By Rick Kahler MS CFP™

Rick Kahler MS CFPAnnuities are popular investments; almost every new physician or other client I see has one. Part of any investment adviser’s due diligence is to understand the history and intentions of the investments in a portfolio.

When I ask why someone purchased an annuity, the most common responses are: “We didn’t have to pay any fees or commissions.” “There are no ongoing expenses.” “All my money is working for me.” “The principal is guaranteed.”

Warning … Warning!

Any time you read or hear “no fees,” “no commissions,” “no expenses,” “free,” or “guaranteed” used in conjunction with an investment, it’s a red flag. All investments, including annuities, have costs associated with them. You need to ask some probing questions about those costs before proceeding.

Fixed Annuity Example

Let’s look at the costs for one popular type of annuity, the fixed annuity. This simply gives you a stated rate of return that often can change annually, similar to a bank certificate of deposit.

Suppose Investor A is sold a fixed annuity with a guaranteed return of 3.5%. Investor B invests her money in a plain vanilla portfolio of mutual funds holding 60% stocks and 40% bonds, which has a long-term projected return of 6%.

The insurance company selling the annuity must earn enough of a return on Investor A’s money to cover their expenses, pay commissions, and return something to Investor A. There is no magic formula on how that’s done. The insurance company invests the money in the same asset classes available to anyone. For the sake of this example, it’s reasonable to assume the insurance company would hold the same 60/40 portfolio as Investor B.

The annuity incurs internal costs for administration, managing the money, insuring the return of principal, and commissions paid to salespeople. While these vary somewhat from company to company, a cost of 2.5% isn’t unreasonable.

***

business-insurance

***

If the company earns 6% and deducts 1% to recoup the upfront commission paid to the salesperson, 1.0% for management costs, and 0.5% for administrative fees, they pay out the remainder as a “fixed” return of 3.5%. Investor A only sees that 3.5% fixed return. If Investor A wants out of the policy before the cost of the up-front commission is fully recovered (usually 4 to 15 years), he will also incur a “surrender penalty” that is approximately equal to the remaining amount of commission paid to the broker selling the policy.

Investor B’s 60/40 portfolio will have the same 6% gross return as the insurance company’s portfolio. If Investor B purchases index funds from a company like Vanguard, her costs could be as low as 0.10%, leaving her a return of 5.9%.

Suppose Investors A and B each accumulates $1 million in retirement funds. The difference between Investor A’s guaranteed 3.5% return and Investor B’s average and unguaranteed 5.9% return is potentially an extra $2,000 a month in retirement income. Guarantees come with a cost.

Why Bother?

Given these numbers, you may wonder why anyone would purchase a fixed annuity? Why bother?

One reason is that many buyers don’t have the confidence that they can invest the money wisely or the stomach to watch the portfolio’s inevitable peaks and valleys.

Another reason is that most buyers don’t fully understand the costs.

Assessment

Unlike stocks, bonds, and mutual funds, most annuities are sold, not bought. I have never had a new client who independently purchased a no-load annuity. The annuities I typically see were sold by someone who received a commission. Commissions are not inherently bad, but in most cases they do inherently create a conflict of interest.

There are always fees associated with any investment. In my experience, the less transparent those fees are, the higher they are.

More:

Even More:

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners(TM)

Drilling Down on Camouflaged Annuity Taxation

Join Our Mailing List

A Fee by any other Name

[By Rick Kahler MS CFP®] http://www.KahlerFinancial.com

Rick Kahler CFPWe South Dakotans can be smug about the economic advantages of residing in our income tax-free state. While those advantages are big, we do have a few lesser-known taxes.

These include a 6% franchise tax on banks and a 4.5% energy minerals severance tax on mining and oil companies. Like many other states, we also tax life insurance premiums; our rate is 2.5%.

The Hidden Annuity Premium Tax

I recently learned about another “hidden” tax, one on annuity premiums. A recent article in Investment News lists the eight states or territories that have such a tax: California, Florida, Maine, Nevada, Puerto Rico, South Dakota, West Virginia, and Wyoming. The tax ranges from 1% in Florida, West Virginia, and Wyoming to a whopping 3.5% in Nevada. South Dakota’s rate is 1.25%.

If you have purchased an annuity while living in one of these jurisdictions, you’ve paid this tax. You may have not been aware of it, as there are many hidden fees associated with purchasing annuities.

The Fee that is a Camouflaged Tax

I learned about the tax when our client service specialist questioned a 1.25% expense charged by the company on a new “no load” annuity. I thought the company had charged a commission of some type to the account, which was puzzling since we don’t accept any commissions. After sorting things out, we discovered the fee was actually the 1.25% premium tax that South Dakota charges on every contribution going into an annuity.

Impact

While states charge the tax just once on new money invested into the annuity, it still serves to decrease the total return of the annuity. If you held an annuity for a year, the premium tax would reduce your overall return by 1.25%. If you held the annuity for 10 years, the overall impact would be much less, reducing the return by 0.125% annually.

Specifics

The states leave the method of collecting the tax up to the annuity company. Most annuity companies that pay a salesperson a commission to sell the product build the fee into the overall costs. This is often easy, since the upfront commissions can range up to 10% and annual expenses up to 7% a year. I have seen more than one annuity where the fees and commissions eat up the majority of any potential return. Many no-load annuities, like Jefferson National, charge the tax to their customers.

The States

If you live in a state that taxes annuity premiums, you might have the idea of buying an annuity in a non-taxing state. This isn’t an option, as companies must levy the tax based on your state of residency.

On the surface, there appears to be some good news for residents of Maine, Nevada, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Residents who purchase an annuity in a qualified plan like an IRA or 401(k) don’t pay the tax. That benefit is somewhat moot, as owning an annuity in a qualified plan is rare. It generally makes little sense for a tax-deferred qualified plan to own a tax-deferred annuity, especially considering the annuity fees.

***

Tax

***

Rule-Outs?

If you live in a state that taxes annuity purchases, should you automatically rule out annuities? Not necessarily. Just be aware you will have to pay the piper. For residents of South Dakota, Florida, and Wyoming, lawmakers argue that maybe the tax isn’t such a heavy burden since these states don’t have an income tax.

Assessment

Still, no matter how you want to figure it, a tax is a tax. It’s one more factor to consider in deciding whether a given annuity product is right for you. Whatever amount you pay in state taxes is just that much less of your money that goes to work for you.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Financial Planning MDs 2015

Comprehensive Financial Planning Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants