IS HEALTHCARE [REALLY] DIFFERENT -OR- NOT?

A Particle Physics Analogy

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA

http://www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org

Some folks, here and elsewhere, often opine that banking is more progressive than healthcare. And, by inference many, if not most, other industries may be included as well.

Unfortunately, this is a ridiculous reality.

WHY: Sorry – Like Heisenberg – You can’t have it both ways.

Health insurance is becoming less like real, pro-active insurance and more like a taxpayer “pay-as-you-go” system. Hence, the two current societal opinions:

HI AS A RIGHT: On the one hand, we opine that you can’t buy car or home owners insurance after the accident or fire. But, you can buy Obamacare after the cancer diagnosis. Not insurance at all; but a right.

HI AS A PRIVILEGE: On the other hand, others opine that HI is for the privileged few.

Now, here is my third option:

HI AS A RESPONSIBILITY: Well, I suggest HI is a responsibility. We do need catastrophic insurance but not for routine health maintenance. The better we are at pro-active responsibility – the less expensive HI should be, with patient skin-in-the-game. And, I have written about Health Savings Accounts [HSAs] before, here and elsewhere.

***

***

Assessment

So, decide which and proceed accordingly. But, just like the Werner Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle; it can’t be both.

NOTE: In quantum mechanics, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is any of a variety of mathematical inequalities asserting a fundamental limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical properties of a particle, known as complementary variables, such as position x and momentum p, can be known simultaneously.

IOW: I can tell you where you are -OR- how fast you are going; but not both.

Conclusion

Your thoughts are appreciated. http://www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com

***