On Hobson’s Economics “Choice”

The Philosophical Tradeoff

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA

[Publisher-in-Chief]

In economics, Hobson’s choice is a free choice in which only one option is offered, and one may refuse to take that option. The philosophical choice is therefore between taking the option; and not taking it. 

A False Choice 

The phrase is said to originate from Thomas Hobson [1544-1630], a livery stable owner who, in order to rotate the use of his horses, offered customers the choice of either taking the horse in the stall nearest the door – or taking none at all. It is analogous to the expression “my way or the highway”. 

In other words, it is in many respects a faux choice – or no choice at all. 

Financial Tradeoff 

Some retired physicians and other retired people live on a fixed income and many of them live right on the edge of their financial capability.  At some time in their life, they may have to make a choice regarding many purchases.  

In this case, we will illustrate “choice” using a couple’s purchase of Long Term Care Insurance. Of course, economics is the study of choice; wants, needs and scarcity, etc. 

In our case, if they decide to make the purchase they commit to a lifetime of premium payments. 

The financial tradeoff is this; if they make the commitment to purchase LTCI, they must give up something else.

Example: 

In order to maintain a monthly premium of $100 ($1,200per year), an elderly doctor, retired layman or couple must essentially relegate about $30,000 of financial assets to generate the $100 necessary to make an average premium payment (assumes a 7% rate of return with 4% withdrawal rate) or [4% X $30,000 = $1,200 year]. 

Thus, if the monthly premium cost is $500 per month, the elder must give up the use of $150,000 of retirement asset just to generate enough cash flow to pay for the LTC insurance. 

The married elder couple has to make the choice between lifestyle (dinners, vacations, gifts to children, prescription drugs, medical care or food and shelter) versus paying an insurance premium to provide for nursing home coverage for a need, which may be very real, but will not occur until sometime in the ambiguous future. 

Assessment 

When faced with such a tough economics – Hobsonian – choice, neither of which delivers peace of mind or a respectable solution; many will simply decide that, in either case, they may already end up impoverished. 

Thus, many will often opt for the better lifestyle now … while they can enjoy it … together. 

Conclusion 

A health economist or financial advisor often has to dispel the myths, hopes and misconceptions of clients and deal with the realities they face. Alternative risk management strategies are important, and health economic choices must be considered in any comprehensive financial plan. 

And so, what are your thoughts and comments on Hobson’s choice [dilemma]? 

Speaker: If you need a moderator or a speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA – Editor and Publisher-in-Chief – is available for speaking engagements. Contact him at: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com 

***

Risk Management, Liability Insurance, and Asset Protection Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™  Risk Management, Liability Insurance, and Asset Protection Strategies for Doctors and Advisors: Best Practices from Leading Consultants and Certified Medical Planners™

***

Invite Dr. Marcinko

***

The Malpractice Insurance Capitation-Liability Theory

Join Our Mailing List

A New Litigation-Equation Philosophy of Liability

[One Healthcare-Executive’s Experiential Opinion] 

[By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™]insurance-book

Developed by iMBA Inc, the factors that comprise the so-called “litigation-equation” include: (1) patient communication factors, (2) provider healthcare delivery systems and reimbursement factors, (3) payer factors and, (4) revised liability legislation and patient encounter data factors. All are briefly reviewed below:

Communication Factors

Patient communication factors for the CLT include; reduced economic and financial fear, consideration of cultural barriers, improved medical awareness through continuing education, concern for geographic access, focused primary and specialty care availability, management information systems, and the frequency and duration of utilization.

Reimbursement Factors

Provider reimbursement factors and healthcare delivery systems include both soft and hard varieties.

Soft CLT provider factors include increased patient availability to services, accessibility to timely appointments, office and quality care satisfaction surveys, communication assessments, known fixed costs and technical information interchanges.

Hard CLT factors include managed operational procedures, illness severity, defined treatment options, clinical variations, outcomes measurements and quality monitoring, performance quotas, aligned financial incentives, and predictable reimbursements.

Payer Factors

Payer factors of the CLT include practitioner screening and shifting, quality assessment, behavioral modification and team care, provider discipline, complaint management, cost and call economic considerations, and adequate capitalization rates.

Liability Factors

Finally, liability factors of the CLT include allegation frequency and severity, standards of care, defensibility, risk management, premium pricing, loss adjustment, legislation, settlement losses, and administrative costs.

WHITE-PAPER: ACOs VBC Capitation SAMPLE DEM

Assessment

To fully understand the CLT, all four parts of the litigation-equation must be recognized. These factors, when integrated with underwriter data and experience, may help determine the level of liability risk and the ultimate cost of malpractice coverage.

For example, if capitated medical care is deemed to involve less risk than in the traditional indemnity environment, then the cost of liability coverage should gradually decrease as the percent of capitated managed care increases, in any particular office setting.

In actual terms, the CLT suggests that capitated insurance and patient care risk are inversely, but not necessarily proportionally, related since experiential data will determine the percentages.

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product Details  Product Details

Product Details

 

Physicians “Stay the Course”

Join Our Mailing List

“Don’t give up Medical Practice, Yet!”

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™dr-david-marcinko 

Practicing Medicine … is Hard to Do 

Is practicing medicine today, really that tough? Increasingly, the answer is “Yes”, according to our doctor clients and the docs we interviewed for this post.  

And, it’s no wonder that Dr. Regina E. Herzlinger – the Nancy R. McPherson professor of business administration and chair at Harvard Business School and author of the books Creating New Healthcare Ventures and Market Term in Healthcare – says that many medical professionals have become depressed and want to give up their careers, entirely. 

For example, Gigi Hirsch, MD, a former ER physician and instructor at Harvard Medical School grew so disenchanted with clinical medicine, that she ditched her career and started her own business, MD IntelliNet, in Brookline, Mass. The company places doctors in non-traditional jobs by pairing them with venture capitalists and other businesses seeking physicians [personal communication].  

In the same light, Michael Burry, MD, a promising young neurologist from Stanford and Vanderbilt, rejected his medical career to become a private portfolio manager for Scion Capital Management, as did Harvard trained radiologist, Faraz Naqvi, MD, the former fund manager for Dresdner RCM Biotechnology Fund [personal communication]. 

Other notables include Dr. Dimitri Sogoloff, MBA of Alexandra Investment Management, LLC, and Dr. Ken Shuben-Stein, CFA©, formerly of Promethean Investing, a hedge fund in New York City [personal communication].   

In a final example, Dr. Laura Eackloff, 45 was a podiatrist for 10 years and thoroughly enjoyed treating patients, but she hated spending more time on the phone negotiating with health insurance companies than examining her patients. “Honestly, health care is a business, and I didn’t like the business of medicine,” said Eackloff, who shut down her practice and opened Gotta Knit, a yarn store in New York City’s Greenwich Village. Her friends and family were extremely supportive of her decision to help people with their hands instead of their feet.

Source: Geoff Williams, Entrepreneur.com [11/27/07]

Assessment

But, Herzlinger implores in her book, Market Driven Healthcare, “don’t give up practice, yet.”  

So, will you stay the course – or abandon ship – and what are your alternatives?

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:

Product DetailsProduct Details

Product Details

Managed Care Backlash?

A True “Sea-Change”

By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP

Publisher-in-Chief 

Does anyone recall a study several years ago by The MEDSTAT Group and JD Power and Associates, which surveyed nearly 30,000 physicians – participating in 150 healthcare plans and located in 22 different markets – nearly seven of ten physicians considered themselves “anti-managed care” with capitation accounts declining in nearly every HMO category. 

Of course, dis-satisfaction with financial reimbursement was the leading factor back then; but 4 other major factors drive physician’s rating of health plans now, as listed below: 

  • Satisfaction with financial reimbursement
  • Administration
  • Policies impacting on care quality
  • Support of clinical practice
  • Limits on medical care

Nevertheless, HMOs had not been initially unresponsive to this managed care backlash. 

For example, since 1998, managed care companies and their allies fought against restrictive new proposed regulations and spent more than $112,000 per lawmaker to lobby Congress.

This 60 million dollar outlay was four times the $14 million plus spent by medical organizations, trial lawyers ($1 million), unions ($1.4 million) and consumer groups ($8 million) to press for passage of the failed Patients Bill of Rights.

The $60 million dollar lobbying tab is also 50 percent higher than the $40 million dollars that tobacco interests spent to kill legislature to raise cigarette taxes to curb teenage smoking! 

But, there have been some recent physician victories.  

For example, the Independence Blue Cross (IBC) and the Pennsylvania Orthopedic Society agreed to settle a class action lawsuit about its payment policies, in July 2003, with payouts in 2004. Members of the class were to receive benefits worth an estimated $40 million, but more importantly, IBC was to disclose its standard fee schedules, changes applicable to provider’s specialty, and policies that may have effected reimbursement.  IBC also replaced its independent procedure designation with Current Procedure Terminology’s (CPT’s) separate procedure designation, and was to process claims in accordance with established standards.

Finally, the insurance company will establish a formal resolution process for provider payments appeals.  

Current and newly defunct IBC subsidiaries include QCC Insurance Company, Keystone Health Plan East, Amerihealth HMO, Amerihealth, Amerihealth HMO New Jersey, or Amerihealth New Jersey. 

Can you report a victory to our readers, in your own case?

Is this a sea-change, or merely an isolated event?