By Staff Reporters
***
***
According to BC Smith and Hilary Davidson, generosity is paradoxical. Those who give, receive back in turn. By spending ourselves for others’ well-being, we enhance our own standing. In letting go of some of what we own, we better secure our own lives. By giving ourselves away, we ourselves move toward flourishing. This is not only a philosophical or religious teaching; it is a sociological fact.
The the generosity paradox can also be stated in the negative.
By grasping on to what we currently have, we lose out on better goods that we might have gained. In holding onto what we possess, we diminish its long-term value to us. And, by always protecting ourselves against future uncertainties and misfortunes, we are affected in ways that make us more anxious about uncertainties and vulnerable to future misfortunes.
In short, by failing to care for others, we do not properly take care of ourselves. It is no coincidence that the word “miser” is etymologically related to the word “miserable.”
COMMENTS APPRECIATED
Subscribe Today!
***
***
Filed under: "Ask-an-Advisor", "Doctors Only", Ethics, Glossary Terms, LifeStyle, mental health | Tagged: Art, Beaster-Christian Smith, books, generosity, generosity paradox, Hilary Davidson, miser, miser paradox, miserliness, miserly, spirituality, travel, writing | Leave a comment »














