On My APHA Peer-Reviewer Invitation

Posted on January 16, 2019 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Dear Dr. David,

APHA’s 2019 Annual Meeting and Expo will bring together more than 12,000 public health professionals to attend 1,000+ scientific sessions on the latest public health research, policy and topics.

We need your help

Become an abstract reviewer! Educational sessions are the highlight of each Annual Meeting, and people often ask how to get involved in session development. Reviewers take a firsthand look at abstracts, evaluate them and help develop scientific content to be presented at the meeting.

Abstract Reviewer Benefits:

  1. Gain experience to add to your CV.
  2. Share and increase your knowledge on public health topics.
  3. Connect with other reviewers, public health professionals and APHA staff.
  4. Contribute to enriching sessions.

Deadline to Become a Reviewer: Jan. 31

Reviewing Begins: March 4

Donna Wright

Manager, Scientific Programs Development

American Public Health Association

Filed under: Health Economics, Health Insurance, Health Law & Policy, Healthcare Finance | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

I’m an APHA Abstract Reviewer for the 2016 Annual Meeting & Expo

Posted on April 8, 2016 by Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA MEd CMP™

Join Our Mailing List

My Invitation Letter with Acceptance

By the APHA Annual Meeting Team

DEM white shirt

Dear Dr. David Marcinko,

Thank you for volunteering to review abstracts for the APHA 2016 Annual Meeting & Expo (Oct. 29 – Nov. 2, 2016). Your efforts and expertise are critical to ensuring the meeting is a successful contribution to our goal of making the U.S. the healthiest nation in one generation.

Selection

You have been selected to review abstracts for the Health Administration program. All abstract reviews must be completed no later than Thursday, March 31, 2016.

COIDs

If you have not completed a conflict of interest disclosure form you will be prompted to do so – on the electronic portal – before accessing your assigned abstracts. Once you have completed the disclosure form you will see a list of your abstracts to review. Simply click on the abstract number and hit “go” to begin your reviews.

Criterion

The criterion and rating scale will be provided at the bottom of each abstract. Abstracts without abstracted text are considered incomplete and should not be reviewed.

NOTE: PLEASE DO NOT REVIEW ANY ABSTRACTS THAT YOU YOURSELF HAVE SUBMITTED.

If you have specific questions regarding your assignment or if you are no longer able to review please contact the program planner for your Section, SPIG, Caucus or Forum or Student Assessment

Assessment

Thank you for your contribution in this very important process. We hope that the online abstract review system makes your work easy however, if you see ways in which we can improve this process please let us know.

Acceptance

Yes, I accepted and completed this professional invitation with thanks and all due humility and gravitas.

***

APHA2016emailbanner

***

Filed under: Research & Development, Touring with Marcinko | Tagged: , , | Leave a comment »