Assessing the Affordable Care Act

Comment Period of Solicitation

By Staff Reporters

Join Our Mailing List 

Last week marked the first anniversary of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) being signed into law by President Obama, and one year into the new era of health care reform it’s clear that Americans remain divided in their views on the ACA.

Depending on the source, polls show the public remains confused about many aspects of the law, with mixed support for several provisions and strong opposition to the individual mandate and other parts of the ACA.

Legal Challenges

With several lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the ACA, governors and state legislators vowing to refuse funding to implement certain ACA programs, and Congress poised to revise or repeal some or all of the law, opponents of the ACA are hopeful that they will have the chance to go back to the drawing board to craft reform legislation more to their liking.

Supporters

Meanwhile, supporters are pointing to widespread public approval of many of the insurance reforms in the law and claiming that once the health exchanges and other major components of the ACA take effect, public support will continue to grow.

The ME-P Wants to Know:

  • Has your support for the ACA changed at all in the year since it was signed into law?
  • Are you pleased with the outcomes to date of the Affordable Care Act?
  • Will the major provisions that have not yet been implemented be able to fulfill the stated goal of covering more patients while reducing overall health care costs?
  • If you are not a supporter of this law, which sections are in most need of revision? Or are you in favor of complete repeal of this law?
  • If you prefer repeal, what alternative approach to health care reform do you favor?

Assessment

Please opine in the comment box below.

Conclusion

And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com and http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details       

Product Details  Product Details

   Product Details 

9 Responses

  1. San Antonio Medical Foundation

    I attended the San Antonio Medical Foundation breakfast last Wednesday, March 23 at the Double Tree on 410. The featured speaker was Tommy Thompson, former Wisconsin Govenor and HHS Secretary and Dr. A. Grover.

    Thompson started off by saying that 1 out of 7 in Bexar County are involved in health care. Over $1 billion in current construction on health care facilities in San Antonio proper. He then talked about Health Care Reform, and walked the audience through the politics in Washington and how Pelosi succeeded in getting the bill passed. But, he said that the bill is “not a law, but an outline” that will take five years to figure out. He said that if Obama wins a second term, the bill will not undergo any significant changes. But, if Obama loses in 2012, he predicted significant changes overall.

    Thompson said that if anyone in the audience thought that the health care bill will go away and it will be business as usual, they were smoking something illegal. “Not going to happen” he opined. And he specifically addressed the physicians in the audience by stating that those who continue their practice as usual, will go out of business. He predicts that doctors will become involved with integrated practices, many joining hospital payroll’s as employees, others starting concierge services.

    Dr. Atul Grover then spoke for about 20 minutes. He said that 6% of all hospitals nationally provide 41% of all charity care and 28% of Medicaid patients. He predicted Medicare payment cuts of over $155 billion over the next ten years and 16 million more people on Medicaid. He said physician issues include the Sunshine Act, Pay Value Modifiers and Quality Reporting requirements. He spent the most part of his presentation outlining the current physician shortages and future physician shortages.

    The audience was composed of hospital administrators/personnel and physicians. There must have been 500 in attendance. The meeting lasted one hour.

    Source: William Rusteberg
    [Risk Manager]
    Industry news & updates @ http://blog.riskmanagers.us/

    Notice: Email is not confidential nor proprietary and is forever imbedded in the public domain.

    Like

  2. Obama ‘Framework’ Would Lower Healthcare Spending by $480 Billion Over 12 Years

    President Barack Obama offered a deficit reduction “framework” Wednesday that would reduce projected healthcare spending by $480 billion as part of an effort to achieve $4 trillion in deficit reductions over the next 12 years.

    Obama’s plan would create first-time Medicare spending caps—based on per beneficiary growth in spending relative to per capita growth of GDP—enforced by the controversial Independent Payment Advisory Board or by the secretary of HHS. That 15-member body—created by the 2010 healthcare law—has drawn concerns from healthcare providers over its power to cut provider payments without Congressional approval to achieve billions of dollars in Medicare spending reductions

    Source: Rich Daly, Modern Healthcare [4/13/11]

    Like

  3. How Health Law’s Tax Increases Affect Docs and Their Practices

    There is little doubt that every physician in the U.S. has an opinion on the 2010 healthcare legislation and its impact on medical care in this country. What is less clear is whether or not most physicians understand the tax ramifications of the new law.

    And so, the following are some of the most significant tax provisions of the healthcare law.

    http://www.physiciansnews.com/2011/04/11/health-care-reform%E2%80%99s-tax-increases-what-it-means-for-you-what-you-can-do-about-it/

    Mary

    Like

  4. Supreme Court Won’t Fast-Track VA Reform Suit

    The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to fast-track oral arguments in a lawsuit in which a Virginia federal judge struck down the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requirement that nearly all private individuals purchase health insurance.

    Virginia Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli II had asked the U.S. Supreme Court to bypass the normal appeals process and take up oral arguments immediately in his case against the ACA. Although it was an extraordinary request, Cuccinelli argued that the high cost and far-reaching implications of the law augured in favor of a swift resolution. The Supreme Court issued a one-sentence denial Monday morning saying it was declining to grant Cuccinelli’s “writ of certiorari before judgment” without elaborating on its reasoning.

    Source: Joe Carlson, Modern Healthcare [4/25/11]

    Like

  5. Judges Sharply Challenge Health Care Law

    A top Obama administration lawyer defending last year’s healthcare law ran into skeptical questions recently from three federal judges, who suggested they may be ready to declare all or part of the law unconstitutional.

    Acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal K. Katyal faced off against former Bush administration Solicitor General Paul Clement in what has become the largest and broadest challenge to the healthcare law thus far.

    In all, 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Business joined in urging the judges to strike down the law.

    http://www.latimes.com/health/la-na-healthcare-court-20110609,0,1457877.story

    Cindy

    Like

  6. Appeals Court Strikes Down Individual Mandate in Reform Law

    In a 304-page opinion, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta on Friday struck down the individual insurance mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, but allowed the rest of the sweeping law to stand. In its decision, a divided three-judge panel of the federal appeals court ruled in favor of 26 states that had joined a lawsuit in Pensacola, FL which argued the reform law should be struck down because it relies on an unconstitutional expansion of federal power.

    The ruling means that the Supreme Court will now have the classic split in the circuit courts that it often relies on when deciding whether to take on a case. The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law in June, and the losers in that case filed for permission last month to have their case heard by the Supreme Court.

    Source: Joe Carlson, Modern Healthcare [8/12/11]

    Like

  7. Half of U.S. Employers Could Stop Health Benefits When ObamaCare Kicks In

    Up to 50% of employers will “definitely or probably pursue alternatives” to their current health insurance plans when ObamaCare becomes fully operative in 2014, according to a McKinsey and Company survey.

    These alternatives include dropping health coverage altogether, offering defined contributions for insurance or offering coverage only to certain employees.

    An estimated 156 million non-elderly Americans get their health coverage at work, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Based on this, Grace-Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute, an Alexandria, Va. research organization focusing on free-market health-care reform and tax policy, says as many as 78 million Americans will be forced to find other sources of coverage.

    McKinsey analyst Alissa Meade paints an even bleaker picture. She told a meeting of health insurance executives last November that “something in the range of 80 million to 100 million individuals are going to change coverage categories in the two years” after insurance mandates take effect in 2014.

    The McKinsey study also found that at least 30% of employers would save money by dropping health coverage – even if they completely compensated employees for the change through other benefit offerings or higher salaries. That’s because they no longer would be burdened by insurance costs that have consistently risen faster than inflation.

    Source: http://www.financialadvisorpublications.com/docs/compdoing.html

    Like

  8. Kaiser Poll Finds More Opposition to Health-Care Overhaul Law

    Some 51% of respondents in a major monthly poll now say they have an unfavorable opinion of the legislation passed by Democrats in March 2010, and just 34% of them feel favorably about it, according to a telephone survey of 1,223 people carried out earlier this month.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2011/10/28/kaiser-poll-finds-more-opposition-to-health-care-overhaul-law

    Ann Miller RN MHA

    Like

  9. Supreme Court to Review Healthcare Reform Law

    The Supreme Court announced it will review whether Congress has the power to compel nearly all Americans to purchase health insurance or face a tax penalty and whether the federal government’s effort to expand state Medicaid programs amounts to illegal coercion.

    In a regular Monday morning order posted on its website, the court announced that it would hear oral arguments on a total of four specific questions raised in federal circuit court decisions that split on the legality of the so-called individual mandate to buy insurance in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Observers have said that decisions for cases argued in the court’s spring term would likely be published by June, which could thrust the case into the national run-up to the November 2012 presidential election.

    Source: Joe Carlson, Modern Healthcare [11/14/11]

    Like

Leave a comment