Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health
The County Health Rankings projects aims to demonstrate that where we live matters to our health.
For example, the health of a community depends on many different factors – ranging from individual health behaviors, education and jobs, to quality of health care, to the environment. This first-of-its-kind collection of 50 reports – one per state – is reported to help community leaders see that where we live, learn, work, and play influences how healthy we are and how long we live.
And – perhaps ever more importantly, the type and quality of the medical care we receive.
A Collaborative
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is collaborating with the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute to develop rankings for each state’s counties. This model has been used to rank the health of counties in Wisconsin for the past six years.
Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health
The County Health Rankings are a key component of the Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health (MATCH) project. MATCH is a collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute.
The Website
The project’s web site provides access to the 50 state reports, ranking each county within the 50 states according to its health outcomes and the multiple health factors that determine a county’s health. Each county receives a summary rank for its health outcomes and health factors and also for the four different types of health factors: health behaviors, clinical care, social and economic factors, and the physical environment. Each county can also drill down to see specific county-level data (as well as state benchmarks) for the measures upon which the rankings are based.
The Ratings and Rankings
It is hoped that the Rankings will serve as a real “call to action” for state and local health departments to develop broad-based solutions in their community so all residents can be healthy. The Rankings team works with health departments to help take advantage of the discussions and opportunities that will arise from the release of the Rankings.
But, efforts must also be made to mobilize community leaders outside the public health sector to take action and invest in programs and policy changes that address barriers to good health and help residents lead healthier lives. This includes education officials; elected and appointed officials, including mayors, governors, health commissioners, city/county councils, legislators, and staff; businesses and employers; the health care sector, and others.
Assessment
The founders believe that the County Health Rankings web site will serve as a corner stone of the project, a place where people from all these sectors can find Rankings data, as well as action steps and the latest news about the multiple factors that determine our health.
Conclusion
And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Give em’ a click and tell us what you think: http://www.countyhealthrankings.org How similar, or dissimilar, is the 20 year old Dartmouth Atlas Project that has documented glaring variations in how medical resources are distributed and used in the United States. The DAP uses Medicare data to provide comprehensive information and analysis about national, regional, and local markets, as well as individual hospitals and their affiliated physicians? http://www.dartmouthatlas.org
Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
Get our Widget: Get this widget!
Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:
Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759
Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790
Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421
Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com
Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com
Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com
Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Sponsors Welcomed
And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.
Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise
Filed under: Quality Initiatives, Research & Development | Tagged: CMS, County Health Rankings, Dartmouth Atlas Project, medical quality, medicare, Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute |















Excellent alert post for this resource.
Now, did you know that hospital infections kill 48,000 patients. Pneumonia, and blood-borne diseases reportedly cost us $8.1 billion in 2006.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35526643/ns/health-infectious_diseases
Chad
LikeLike
The CEO and President
For more info on the topic, please visit this link from Risa Lavizzo-Mourey MD, CEO and President of the Robert Wood Jouhnson Foundation.
http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2010/02/is-geography-your-health-destiny-.html#comments
Hope Rachel Hetico; RN, MHA
[Managing Editor]
LikeLike
Medicare PQRI Still Gets Bad Grades From Physicians
Now in its fourth reporting year, Medicare’s Physician Quality Reporting Initiative continues to frustrate physician practices that are looking to access feedback reports from past years and use them to improve their patient care, according to research released February 17th, by the Medical Group Management Association [MGMA].
MGMA surveyed practices representing more than 11,000 physicians and found that fewer than half were able to access their PQRI feedback reports from the 2008 reporting year. That’s a decline from the 51% who successfully obtained their reports for 2007, the first year of the program.
And, 60% of practices that were able to access their 2008 reports were either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the information.
Source: Chris Silva, AMNews [3/1/10]
LikeLike