Consumerism is the Hippocratic Way
The Appearance of DR. Oogle
By September of 2005, when I finally worked up enough courage to ask a patient to post a review for me on DR. Oogle (doctoroogle.com) – a web-based patient referral site – my dental practice had been invisible and struggling for a few years and was still disappearing. It was the most discouraging period in my career.
Following the Golden Rule
In spite of my efforts to always treat my patients like I would want to be treated myself, I was headed for either managed care, which I consider to be an unethical model for dentistry, or bankruptcy. The progressive betrayal of my profession and my patients by leaders in dentistry spawned bitterness and high blood pressure that I still suffer today – even though my practice has fully recovered. My hygienist and I are currently booked almost solid for the next two weeks. I know also that in the next three, misfortune could arise. I have no idea what is in store for dentistry in tomorrow’s economy. If I was in the business of selling advice, or DR. Oogle, I would probably be tempted to radiate much more confidence than I truly feel.
Back in the Day
When I graduated from dental school in 1982, I was reassured by dentists I respected that one’s practice location is not important if one works hard to consistently provide patients with one’s best efforts. Dr. Earl Estep, a practice development guru from Athens, Texas, taught me decades ago that word-of-mouth is much more effective for attracting patients who are ready to spend money than advertisements provide, and that one should never forget to ask for referrals, even if it feels “unprofessional.” This is still solid advice. For example, two days ago, in a special marketing feature on Jim Du Molin’s The Wealthy Dentist Blog, Chris Barnard suggested,
“Enlist your existing patients in your practice success. Actively seek those all-important word of mouth referrals from your patients.”
Link: http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/727/practice-marketing-in-down-times
Even though Barnard doesn’t mention patient referral sites such as DR. Oogle, his other ideas which may or may not fit one’s practice image include quarterly letters, $10 gas cards and iPod raffles in order to
“… Let them know who you are beyond that white lab coat …!”
Just Do it … and Ask
I personally think it is much less complicated, as well as much cheaper, to simply select a recently satisfied patient, look the person in the eye and ask,
“Would you mind putting in a good word for me on this website?”
Handing a patient a business card with the website handwritten on it becomes easier to do after the first dozen or so, but don’t expect immediate results. My success rate was around 45% when I was actively pursuing favors. When I reached 90 reviews after around nine months, I quit pestering my patients with requests for reviews. Active participation in a patient referral site also provides the incentive to improve one’s practice by motivating both dentists and staff to become wrapped up in treating each patient with extra-special care in the hopes of a nice review. Before anyone knows it, personalized, attentive care becomes a habit, I have found. Other than those who sell ads and party favors, everyone wins.
Enter Dr. Oogle
I came across DR. Oogle in March 2005. The open-source patient satisfaction measurement application was born in San Francisco at the very end of the .com bust, and had been actively gathering word-of-mouth data about dentists for over two years when I began observing its progress. By then, DR. Oogle had already accumulated an impressive amount of information concerning patient satisfaction with many of nation’s dentists. I suspect that today, Dr. Oogle’s volume of data is insurmountable by potential competitors.
Akin to Wikipedia
I found DR Oogle’s revolutionary marketing concept fascinating simply because like Wikipedia, it is not supported by advertising – thus avoiding a tremendous built-in and transparent bias. The company’s profits are derived solely from dentists like me who agree to pay reasonable monthly fees for the opportunity to participate in the application by displaying their customers’ opinions for public scrutiny. It is what I call playing to win rather than playing not to lose. Five months before I purchased the service, I published an article about DR. Oogle in The Twelfth Night, the monthly newsletter of my local dental society. I believe mine was the first mention of such web-based patient referral sites in any dental publication. Here is the article:
Patient Driven Referral Services
[From: “The Twelfth Night” April, 2005]
In a small community people as a general rule know a lot more about their neighbors than do people in a city. They also know a lot more about the doctors and dentists in town since there are only a few. It is fairly common to talk to neighbors and friends to get opinions on who is the best dentist, who to avoid, who is the cheapest, who has the most up to date equipment.
In a small community, as well as in a city, even a neighbor’s recommendation carries more weight than a dentist’s paid advertisement. I would imagine that sales of 1 800 Dentist subscriptions are significantly lower in rural Texas than in the metropolitan areas on a per capita basis. The dentists in small communities know that they are far too easy to find to need to spend money for a referral service or for much advertisement at all.
Well, Fort Worth and cities across the nation are becoming smaller dental communities because of the internet. If any of you have googled your name, you may have picked up a hit by one or more patient driven referral services (PDRS). And, if you have not done this lately, you should. There is a good possibility that the information about your practice location may contain errors. But more importantly, you may read something pleasingly flattering or terribly humbling about your practice written by a patient you saw last week.
Dr. Oogle is presently the most popular PDRS. A patient’s comments about his or her dentist is posted only after the patient accepts the terms of the agreement; which are that the patient is neither a relative nor an employee of the dentist and that the patient is not otherwise being compensated for the review. The website also requires an authentic e-mail address and other personal information for verification purposes.
There is a filtering system in place in which employees of Dr. Oogle reject (at their discretion) comments which are too good or too bad to be credible. And there are other ways in which dentists can handle bad reviews and are described on their website. There is, I suppose, always room for an attorney or two if the other attempts at removing a bad review fail.
But, if the PDRS’s survive the lawsuits, and if the first review which comes up under your name happens to be a real stinker written by an easily disgruntled and fervently vindictive patient (I think his name is Fred. You probably know him as he changes dentists often), and if you cannot get it otherwise removed, perhaps you should bury it under as many good reviews as you can encourage your patients to submit. This reaction, not surprisingly, is the reaction recommended by Dr. Oogle. In fact, they also recommend that we routinely ask our patients to submit reviews to them. I imagine that there are already dentists who have had cards printed for this purpose.
Like it or not, our patients are being given more power in the marketing of our practices and their influence is growing. Dr. Oogle’s first reviews of dentists in the greater Ft. Worth area occurred in September of ’04. By the first of February, 5½ months later, there were only 18 dentists who had been reviewed by at least one patient. As of today, one month later (March 7), there are 16 more. By the time this is published the number could be close to 50. Who knows how many reviews will be posted a year from now if the public perceives value in this kind of information. Many more of us will be listed as either good or bad dentists; legitimately or not.
Regardless of the outcome of Dr. Oogle’s venture into dentistry, the fact that the public has a thirst for “unbiased” sources of information concerning our practices tells us that more than ever before we have to treat each patient as our most important source of new business or a disappointed patient could soon become a significant obstacle for growth.
Another good thing is that a patient who has to choose a dentist from a list at least soon may have some guidance; other than the fact that his insurance company thinks they are all equally swell.
Darrell K. Pruitt; DDS
[April 2005]
Investigative Reporting
Since writing the unprecedented article, I have performed numerous simple investigations comparing DR. Oogle’s ratings to dentists’ names on preferred provider lists for various cities. Invariably, the vast majority of the dentists who sign managed care contracts are found in the bottom 50% of the ratings. Sorry if I hurt some colleagues’ feelings, but that is cold fact. Anyone with a preferred provider list can confirm it. I suspect it has been done thousands of times by many anxious people holding new annual lists of strangers’ names in just the last year. Alert dentists should note that humans are choosy when it comes to trusting someone to use sharp, rotating instruments in their mouths. Dentistry is not like buying a can of beans as discount brokers would have their naïve and trusting clients believe, and most importantly, ethics are not for free.
Apart from the common sense rule that a purchaser of intricate handwork to exacting tolerances generally gets what the dental patient pays for, what else causes fee-for-service dentists to be generally favored over preferred providers? I think it has to do with hunger. If one’s meals arrive daily without effort, one forgets how to fish.
Managed care and preferred provider lists protect contract dentists from the naturally cleansing free-market principles taught by economist Adam Smith centuries ago. The beauty of competition in the marketplace occurs every time a dis-satisfied patient shops for a new dentist. When reliable information about patient satisfaction is available, quality is rewarded and encouraged in the neighborhood. Free-market capitalism works as reliably as classical operant conditioning in the best of possible worlds.
Assessment
It is my opinion that there has always been something dishonest and un-American about discount dentistry with no quality control. I think we need to expose the unfair and unethical managed care business model to free-market forces even if it involves the calculated promotion of a simple, foolproof scheme for dentists interested in graduating from preferred provider lists. Those who feel trapped can begin their escape immediately by preparing some business cards for their managed care dental patients who by now are easily impressed by compassion. I’ll share more in Part 2.
Conclusion
And so, your thoughts and comments on this Medical Executive-Post are appreciated. If US dental patients are lucky, Web 2.0 transparency arrived just in time. Consumerism rules naturally.
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com or Bio: www.stpub.com/pubs/authors/MARCINKO.htm
Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:
Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759
Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790
Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421
Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com
Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com
Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com
Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest E-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Filed under: Career Development, Ethics, Experts Invited, Information Technology, Managed Care, Marketing & Advertising, Media Mentions and PR, Practice Management | Tagged: Chris Barnard, Darrell Pruitt, DDS, dentist, DR. ooogle, Earl Estep, health 2.0, health 3.0, Jim Du Molin, PDRS, social networks, the wealthy dentist blog |















ADA Transparency Experiment
In the last three weeks, I have sent five questions to various addresses posted in ADA literature. Only one has been honored with a response.
Last week I posted two questions to two different addresses in the ADA.
Test 1 was a question which I sent to online@ada.org . I asked “How many Dentists are in the ADA?”
It has been well over a week now, and I have not received a response from the site. I will one day find out which employee is responsible for that mistake and share the name with you.
Test 2 from last week was a success. Within 24 hours my question was answered by the EBD department in the ADA. The question concerned my application to the EBD Conference in May. I was told that the final selection of attendees has not been finalized, but that I will be notified soon. That’s good enough for me. Bravo, EBD! You passed, even though it was a soft question. The next one could be tougher – regardless whether I am chosen or not.
The EBD department shows how questions from membership should be handled each and every time – respectfully.
Conclusion
All is not lost. At least one department in the ADA is not shy about answering members’ question. Let’s see if I can uncover any other courageous departments.
New week – A new department
The question I sent to the “E-Mail Science” link is not as soft as the one I sent to the EBD group, nor is it as soft as it appears.
http://www.ada.org/ada/contact/email.asp?link=16
Nevertheless, it is a legitimate, reasonable and straight-forward question that I asked a representative from this department almost a year ago. He told me to my face that there is no difference in quality between managed care dentistry and fee-for-service dentistry. I wonder if he still feels the same way.
Here is the question: “Can you tell me if there been any published studies that have investigated whether managed care dental patients receive more treatment than fee-for-service dental patients?” See you in a week.
Darrell
LikeLike
ADA Online – Ad space for rent
An advertisement for ADA/Intelligent Dental Marketing that is easily mistaken as a serious ADA article was posted on the ADA News Online this week. How do I know it is an ad? For one thing, there is no byline.
http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/pubs/adanews/adanewsarticle.asp?articleid=3505
The title is “Getting back to basics – ADA/idm offers marketing help in down economy.” Do you know what ADA/idm “basics” are? Direct mail and Web site design. I assume they no longer push Search Engine Optimization. That’s a good thing because everyone knows that they were lousy at it.
Kristie Nation, vice president of business development for ADA/idm says, “Our staff of marketing coaches is experienced with helping dental practices achieve their goals.” She adds that the experts at ADA/idm generally advise their clients to invest 2 to 3 percent of collections in marketing their practices. To put that into perspective, if one’s practice nets 35 percent after expenses, the ADA suggests that 6 to 9 percent of a dentist’s profits should be plowed back into advertising – preferably with Intelligent Dental Marketing. After all, our non-profit professional organization is an investor-owner in Intelligent Dental Marketing. That makes members investor-owners in the Utah advertising business as well.
Times are tough all over, and we need to step up and help protect the ADA’s payroll as well as our investment. Take a hit for dentistry’s future. Blast some postcards in your neighborhood. It helps postal workers as well.
“Image is everything.”
– ADA/idm slogan.
D. Kellus Pruitt; DDS
LikeLike
The word “coach” has no real meaning; just a catch-all term used to impress but void of any credentials at all.
Of course, image is everything, isn’t it?
Anonymous
LikeLike
Trying out a Twittertool
I intend to illustrate the employment of a PR tool that is probably already being used many times a day by activist-consumers who long ago discovered it on Twitter, but are probably keeping it a secret. It involves recruiting a business acquaintance of command-and-control target to send a message to the stoic good ol’ boy from a new and unexpected direction. If everything goes properly, the fire-and-forget missive penetrates deep into the hardened bunker before detonation… sorry. I’m not just a common practical joker – I’m also a sensitive poet.
Six months ago, as part of the first section of this PennWell Community College course, I illustrated how one can penetrate the boardrooms of huge companies these days using only an email address and a public forum like this. Little did I know back then that compared to the unconventional posting of an open email to a CEO for anyone to see, Twitter supplies the nuclear technology which has the potential of undermining a target’s inter-business relationships in the community. Let me show you what I mean. Better put on some old shoes. There’s blood and stuff on the floor.
I discovered David Politis on Twitter today. He is President of Politis Communications, a high-tech and life sciences public relations, investor relations and marketing communications agency that has been in business since 1990. I like David. He’s honest. But since he’s the unwitting accomplice to my practical joke, and since he will probably catch on soon enough, he may justifiably fail to see the humor in my trick. If so, sorry David, it was nothing personal.
Politis put together an interesting and useful collection of 25 PR tips that he published on his blog.
http://www.politis.com/politis-pr-tip-24-tell-the-truth.html#comments
His tip number 24 titled “Tell the Truth” is the one that caught my attention. Here is how his advice opens:
“I was reminded this morning about a basic underlying principle of public relations that seems so obvious that I almost wasn’t going to include it here (but I decided to anyway).
That principle is this:
Tell the truth.
If you ever want to undo all of the goodwill and positive vibes you have generated for your company, client, products, services or people, just lie.”
How true. His tip inspired me to post the following comment:
“David, your ‘Politis PR Tip #24: Tell the Truth’ is very important advice now more than ever before. Rumors quickly penetrate deep and wide these days. Social networking has brought unprecedented and unwelcome transparency to command-and-control institutions, and there are plenty of instances where hired liars’ hides have been publicly scorched by those who take it upon themselves to keep their communities clean – even if it means crushing someone’s reputation.
Inevitably, modern transparency silences those who customarily hide information that their customers should rightfully know, because it quickly becomes tedious and tiresome to try to maintain a half-transparent facade. The subsequent absence of conversation in the marketplace immediately harms businesses that are guilty of insensitivity because more and more consumers expect an Internet presence. Furthermore, once a business is silenced, the defenseless leaders become easily defined by detractors, and called out by name. At that point, more silence will not help them.”
That would be called involuntary branding.
D. Kellus Pruitt
Now the rest of the story. Flashback – November 15, 2008: Lesson four “Trapping a slow-moving beast – A transparent field trip.”
http://community.pennwelldentalgroup.com/forum/topics/social-networking-advanced?page=1&commentId=2013420%3AComment%3A19917&x=1#2013420Comment19917
It was part of the fall semester course when I sent the open email to Trajan King, CEO of Intelligent Dental Marketing, who was recently appointed CEO of ADA/idm. The for-profit Intelligent Dental Marketing enjoys a business partnership with my non-profit American Dental Association. In the email, I requested information about IDM’s business relationship with my professional organization to which I pay yearly dues. I assume I am justified in requesting such information because in the six months since, nobody has told me otherwise. Nobody has said a thing, as a matter of fact. They’re hunkering down.
So where does Twitter come in? It’s so simple. By comparing Trajan King’s followers with David Politis’ …Bingo. I discovered that Trajan and David are a pair of mutually connected followers who live in the same state (probably the same town), and both are involved in PR. I bet they go to lunch together. What if they turn out to be brothers-in-law?
What do you think Politis will think when he discovers what has happened? By his response to my comment on his blog, I don’t thing he’ll be amused.
“David – May 13th, 2009 10:59 am:
Thank you for your reasoned and considered comment.
D. Kellus.
Social media and social networking tools, services and platforms are indeed opening up whole new vistas of transparency, and in the process, are changing the ways individuals and organizations interact and communicate with one another — perhaps forever.
Old habits often die hard, however. And a corollary might be that new technologies/services do not always grow quickly. But then again, I was using a typewriter to produce news releases, memos and letters back in 1984.
Thanks again for your comment.”
David Politis’ lesson number 26 should be, “Careful who you associate with.”
D. Kellus Pruitt
————————————-
I think there will be one more lesson to this section. It will involve een kwaad man (an angry man – Flemish) Stay tuned.
LikeLike