A New Emerging Modern Peril
By Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA, CMP™
[Publisher-in-Chief]
In the past, a physician expert witness for the plaintiff was merely an opposing opinion by a learned and/or like colleague. Today, it is becoming a risk management minefield as the AMA and other groups are urging state medical licensing boards to police expert witnesses, which might require expert testimony be considered the practice of medicine.
The AANS
This seems especially true with the Rolling Meadows Illinois based American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS).
Feuding Members
Currently, a member of the AANS can file a complaint against any fellow member for testimony as either an expert witness for the plaintiff, or defense witness for the doctor. A committee of four then reviews the court records and requires the accuser to face the accused in a formal review. Sanctions range form three months to a year, to complete expulsion from the association. In the past twenty years, the program has reviewed 27 cases all involving plaintiff testimony. One led to expulsion and ten to suspension.
Assessment
Since 2001, the courts are beginning to take the AANS process seriously. After years of operations without strong legal backing, the program was upheld by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Chicago by a neurosurgeon whom the group suspended in 1997. So always remember, if you testify falsely, or too far from the norm, you may be at risk.
Conclusion
And so your thoughts, opinions and comments are appreciated?
Speaker: If you need a moderator or a speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David Edward Marcinko; MBA – Editor and Publisher-in-Chief – is available for speaking engagements. Contact him at: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
Filed under: Risk Management | Tagged: expert witness, medical lawsuites, medical malpractice, medical negligence, Professional Liability | 4 Comments »















