ME-P SYNDICATIONS:
WSJ.com,
CNN.com,
Forbes.com,
WashingtonPost.com,
BusinessWeek.com,
USNews.com, Reuters.com,
TimeWarnerCable.com,
e-How.com,
News Alloy.com,
and Congress.org






BOARD CERTIFICATION EXAM STUDY GUIDES
Lower Extremity Trauma
[Click on Image to Enlarge]
The “Medical Executive-Post” is about connecting doctors, health care executives and modern consulting advisors. It’s about free-enterprise, business, practice, policy, personal financial planning and wealth building capitalism. We have an attitude that’s independent, outspoken, intelligent and so Next-Gen; often edgy, usually controversial. And, our consultants “got fly”, just like U. Read it! Write it! Post it! “Medical Executive-Post”. Call or email us for your FREE advertising and sales consultation TODAY [678.779.8597] Email: MarcinkoAdvisors@outlook.com



ePodiatryConsentForms.com
Suite #5901 Wilbanks Drive, Norcross, Georgia, 30092 USA [1.678.779.8597]. Our location is real and we are now virtually enabled to assist new long distance clients and out-of-town colleagues.
If you want the opportunity to work with leading health care industry insiders, innovators and watchers, the “ME-P” may be right for you? We are unbiased and operate at the nexus of theoretical and applied R&D. Collaborate with us and you’ll put your brand in front of a smart & tightly focused demographic; one at the forefront of our emerging healthcare free marketplace of informed and professional “movers and shakers.” Our Ad Rate Card is available upon request [678-779-8597].

“Providing Management, Financial and Business Solutions for Modernity”
Whether you’re a mature CXO, physician or start-up entrepreneur in need of management, financial, HR or business planning information on free markets and competition, the "Medical Executive-Post” is the online place to meet for Capitalism 2.0 collaboration.

Support our online development, and advance our onground research initiatives in free market economics, as we seek to showcase the brightest Next-Gen minds.
THE ME-P DISCLAIMER: Posts, comments and opinions do not necessarily represent iMBA, Inc., but become our property after submission. Copyright © 2006 to-date. iMBA, Inc allows colleges, universities, medical and financial professionals and related clinics, hospitals and non-profit healthcare organizations to distribute our proprietary essays, photos, videos, audios and other documents; etc. However, please review copyright and usage information for each individual asset before submission to us, and/or placement on your publication or web site. Attestation references, citations and/or back-links are required. All other assets are property of the individual copyright holder.
Price Transparency Tool Increased Spending
The Journal of the American Medical Association recently published a study of the impact of price transparency tools on healthcare spending at two large companies. Here are some key findings from the report:
• Spending among employees with a price transparency tool went from $2021 before the tool to $2233.
• Among controls, mean outpatient spending changed from $1985 to $2138.
• Being offered the tool was associated with a mean $59 increase in outpatient spending.
• Out-of-pocket spending among those offered the tool was $507 in the year before and $555 the year after.
• Being offered the transparency tool was associated with a $18 increase in out-of-pocket spending.
• In the first 12 months, 10% of employees who were offered the tool used it at least once.
Source: JAMA, May 3, 2016
LikeLike
Variation in health outcomes
The role of spending on social services, public health, and health care 2000-09
◾ A new study in Health Affairs looks at the association between variation in state-level health outcomes and how states allocate spending between healthcare and social services.
◾ Used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the CDC, and the National Center for Health Statistics for all 50 states to calculate state-level health outcomes (including but not limited to BMI, prevalence of asthma, and state-level mortality rates for AMI, lung cancer, and type 2 diabetes) and spending on social services and public health relative to healthcare spending to estimate any association between the two variables.
States with a higher ratio of social to health spending had significantly better health outcomes for:
◾ Adult obesity
◾ Asthma
◾ Mortality rates for AMI, lung cancer, type II diabetes
◾ Mentally unhealthy days
◾ Days with activity limitations
Implications
Spending more on social services and public health rather than just on healthcare “may be key to understanding variations in health outcomes across the states,” but as the authors note from these findings we “cannot infer causality”.
Camille
LikeLike