Last Minute Considerations for Medical Professionals … and Us All
By Robert Whirley CPA
2500-190 North Winds Parkway
Alpharetta GA 30009-2245
Dear ME-P Readers:
Year-end tax planning could be especially productive this year because timely action could nail down a host of tax breaks that won’t be around next year unless Congress acts to extend them, which, at the present time, looks doubtful. I have tried to keep this brief but, as typical, the changes this year are voluminous.
High-Income Earners
High-income-earners have other factors to keep in mind when mapping out year-end plans. For the first time, they have to take into account the 3.8% surtax on unearned income and the additional 0.9% Medicare (hospital insurance, or HI) tax that applies to individuals receiving wages with respect to employment in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 for married couples filing jointly and $125,000 for married couples filing separately).
Medicare Tax
The additional Medicare tax may require year-end actions. Employers must withhold the additional Medicare tax from wages in excess of $200,000 regardless of filing status or other income. Self-employed persons must take it into account in figuring estimate tax. There could be situations where an employee may need to have more withheld toward year end to cover the tax.
For example, an individual earns $200,000 from one employer during the first half of the year and a like amount from another employer during the balance of the year. He would owe the additional Medicare tax, but there would be no withholding by either employer for the additional Medicare tax since wages from each employer don’t exceed $200,000.
Also, in determining whether they may need to make adjustments to avoid a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax, individuals also should be mindful that the additional Medicare tax may be over-withheld. This could occur, for example, where only one of two married spouses works and reaches the threshold for the employer to withhold, but the couple’s income won’t be high enough to actually cause the tax to be owed.
Checklist
I have compiled a checklist of additional actions based on current tax rules that may help you save tax dollars if you act before year-end. Not all actions will apply in your particular situation, but you will likely benefit from many of them.
[Year-End Tax Planning Moves for Individuals]
• Increase the amount you set aside for next year in your employer’s health flexible spending account (FSA) if you set aside too little for this year.
• If you become eligible to make health savings account (HSA) contributions in December of this year, you can make a full year’s worth of deductible HSA contributions for 2013.
• Realize losses on stock while substantially preserving your investment position. There are several ways this can be done. For example, you can sell the original holding, then buy back the same securities at least 31 days later. It may be advisable for us to meet to discuss year-end trades you should consider making.
• Postpone income until 2014 and accelerate deductions into 2013 to lower your 2013 tax bill. This strategy may enable you to claim larger deductions, credits, and other tax breaks for 2013 that are phased out over varying levels of adjusted gross income (AGI). These include child tax credits, higher education tax credits, the above-the-line deduction for higher-education expenses, and deductions for student loan interest. Postponing income also is desirable for those taxpayers who anticipate being in a lower tax bracket next year due to changed financial circumstances. Note, however, that in some cases, it may pay to actually accelerate income into 2013. For example, this may be the case where a person’s marginal tax rate is much lower this year than it will be next year or where lower income in 2014 will result in a higher tax credit for an individual who plans to purchase health insurance on a health exchange and is eligible for a premium assistance credit.
• If you believe a Roth IRA is better than a traditional IRA, and want to remain in the market for the long term, consider converting traditional-IRA money invested in beaten-down stocks (or mutual funds) into a Roth IRA if eligible to do so. Keep in mind, however, that such a conversion will increase your adjusted gross income for 2013.
• If you converted assets in a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA earlier in the year, the assets in the Roth IRA account may have declined in value, and if you leave things as-is, you will wind up paying a higher tax than is necessary. You can back out of the transaction by recharacterizing the rollover or conversion, that is, by transferring the converted amount (plus earnings, or minus losses) from the Roth IRA back to a traditional IRA via a trustee-to-trustee transfer. You can later reconvert to a Roth IRA.
• It may be advantageous to try to arrange with your employer to defer a bonus that may be coming your way until 2014.
• Consider using a credit card to prepay expenses that can generate deductions for this year.
• If you expect to owe state and local income taxes when you file your return next year, consider asking your employer to increase withholding of state and local taxes (or pay estimated tax payments of state and local taxes) before year-end to pull the deduction of those taxes into 2013 if doing so won’t create an alternative minimum tax (AMT) problem.
• Take an eligible rollover distribution from a qualified retirement plan before the end of 2013 if you are facing a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax and the increased withholding option is unavailable or won’t sufficiently address the problem. Income tax will be withheld from the distribution and will be applied toward the taxes owed for 2013. You can then timely roll over the gross amount of the distribution, as increased by the amount of withheld tax, to a traditional IRA. No part of the distribution will be includible in income for 2013, but the withheld tax will be applied pro rata over the full 2013 tax year to reduce previous underpayments of estimated tax.
• Estimate the effect of any year-end planning moves on the alternative minimum tax (AMT) for 2013, keeping in mind that many tax breaks allowed for purposes of calculating regular taxes are disallowed for AMT purposes. These include the deduction for state property taxes on your residence, state income taxes (or state sales tax if you elect this deduction option), miscellaneous itemized deductions, and personal exemption deductions. Other deductions, such as for medical expenses, are calculated in a more restrictive way for AMT purposes than for regular tax purposes in the case of a taxpayer who is over age 65 or whose spouse is over age 65 as of the close of the tax year. As a result, in some cases, deductions should not be accelerated.
• Accelerate big ticket purchases into 2013 in order to assure a deduction for sales taxes on the purchases if you will elect to claim a state and local general sales tax deduction instead of a state and local income tax deduction. Unless Congress acts, this election won’t be available after 2013.
• You may be able to save taxes this year and next by applying a bunching strategy to “miscellaneous” itemized deductions, medical expenses and other itemized deductions.
• If you are a homeowner, make energy saving improvements to the residence, such as putting in extra insulation or installing energy saving windows, or an energy efficient heater or air conditioner. You may qualify for a tax credit if the assets are installed in your home before 2014.
• Unless Congress extends it, the up-to-$4,000 above-the-line deduction for qualified higher education expenses will not be available after 2013. Thus, consider prepaying eligible expenses if doing so will increase your deduction for qualified higher education expenses. Generally, the deduction is allowed for qualified education expenses paid in 2013 in connection with enrollment at an institution of higher education during 2013 or for an academic period beginning in 2013 or in the first 3 months of 2014.
• You may want to pay contested taxes to be able to deduct them this year while continuing to contest them next year.
• You may want to settle an insurance or damage claim in order to maximize your casualty loss deduction this year.
• If you are age 70-1/2 or older, own IRAs and are thinking of making a charitable gift, consider arranging for the gift to be made directly by the IRA trustee. Such a transfer, if made before year-end, can achieve important tax savings.
• Take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from your IRA or 401(k) plan (or other employer-sponsored retired plan) if you have reached age 70-1/2. Failure to take a required withdrawal can result in a penalty of 50% of the amount of the RMD not withdrawn. If you turned age 70-1/2 in 2013, you can delay the first required distribution to 2013, but if you do, you will have to take a double distribution in 2014-the amount required for 2013 plus the amount required for 2014. Think twice before delaying 2013 distributions to 2014-bunching income into 2014 might push you into a higher tax bracket or have a detrimental impact on various income tax deductions that are reduced at higher income levels. However, it could be beneficial to take both distributions in 2014 if you will be in a substantially lower bracket that year, for example, because you plan to retire late this year.
• Make gifts sheltered by the annual gift tax exclusion before the end of the year and thereby save gift and estate taxes. You can give $14,000 in 2013 to each of an unlimited number of individuals but you can’t carry over unused exclusions from one year to the next. The transfers also may save family income taxes where income-earning property is given to family members in lower income tax brackets who are not subject to the kiddie tax.
[Year-End Tax-Planning Moves for Businesses & Business Owners]
• Businesses should consider making expenditures that qualify for the business property expensing option. For tax years beginning in 2013, the expensing limit is $500,000 and the investment ceiling limit is $2,000,000. And a limited amount of expensing may be claimed for qualified real property. However, unless Congress changes the rules, for tax years beginning in 2014, the dollar limit will drop to $25,000, the beginning-of-phaseout amount will drop to $200,000, and expensing won’t be available for qualified real property. The generous dollar ceilings that apply this year mean that many small and medium sized businesses that make timely purchases will be able to currently deduct most if not all their outlays for machinery and equipment. What’s more, the expensing deduction is not prorated for the time that the asset is in service during the year. This opens up significant year-end planning opportunities.
• Businesses also should consider making expenditures that qualify for 50% bonus first year depreciation if bought and placed in service this year. This bonus writeoff generally won’t be available next year unless Congress acts to extend it. Thus, enterprises planning to purchase new depreciable property this year or the next should try to accelerate their buying plans, if doing so makes sound business sense.
• Nail down a work opportunity tax credit (WOTC) by hiring qualifying workers (such as certain veterans) before the end of 2013. Under current law, the WOTC won’t be available for workers hired after this year.
• Make qualified research expenses before the end of 2013 to claim a research credit, which won’t be available for post-2013 expenditures unless Congress extends the credit.
• If you are self-employed and haven’t done so yet, set up a self-employed retirement plan.
• Depending on your particular situation, you may also want to consider deferring a debt-cancellation event until 2014, and disposing of a passive activity to allow you to deduct suspended losses.
• If you own an interest in a partnership or S corporation you may need to increase your basis in the entity so you can deduct a loss from it for this year.
Assessment
These are just some of the year-end steps that can be taken to save taxes.
Conclusion
Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
OUR OTHER PRINT BOOKS AND RELATED INFORMATION SOURCES:
LEXICONS: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko
PHYSICIANS: www.MedicalBusinessAdvisors.com
PRACTICES: www.BusinessofMedicalPractice.com
HOSPITALS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466558731
CLINICS: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439879900
ADVISORS: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.org
BLOG: www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
Filed under: Accounting, Taxation | Tagged: Robert Whirley CPA, Year end tax planning |


















Mr. Whirley,
This is a fine and timely ME-P; many thanks for your expertise and for sharing.
Aida
LikeLike
Dear ME-P Readers,
This is a reminder that S-Corporation shareholder health insurance premiums need to be included on your W-2’s.
If you have such premiums, make sure to let your payroll service know the amount so they can add them to the W-2s in their year-end processing. If you are an S corporation shareholder and you have been paying your own premiums, be sure you turn them in for reimbursement before December 31 so they are included on your W-2.
Shareholders are required to pick up the premiums as income, but they get an offsetting deduction. These premiums are included in Box 1 taxable income, but they don’t count as wages for FICA or Medicare tax.
S Corporations have to either pay the premiums directly or reimburse the shareholder for documented premium payments. The S corporation also must include the payments in Box 1 of the shareholder employee’s W-2. The shareholder must report the W-2 income, but then deduct the premiums on line 29 of their personal return. The net effect of these maneuvers is the same as if the insurance were never included in income in the first place.
Failure to properly include shareholder health insurance on your W-2 will lead to a disallowance of this deduction completely. This has been a requirement from the IRS since 2008 but they are now really beginning to disallow the deduction due to lack of proper reporting.
Susan Willever
[Whirley & Associates, LLC]
Alpharetta, GA
LikeLike
Another Year End Tax Planning Article
http://wealthmanagement.com/wealth-planning/good-year-get-your-year-end-tax-moves-right?NL=WM-10&Issue=WM-10_20131122_WM-10_635&YM_RID=marcinkoadvisors%40msn.com&YM_MID=1434779&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_5
Dr. David Edward Marcinko MBA
LikeLike
Dear ME-P Readers,
This is a reminder that S-Corporation shareholder health insurance premiums need to be included on your W-2’s.
If you have such premiums, make sure to let your payroll service know the amount so they can add them to the W-2s in their year-end processing. If you are an S corporation shareholder and you have been paying your own premiums, be sure you turn them in for reimbursement before December 31 so they are included on your W-2.
Shareholders are required to pick up the premiums as income, but they get an offsetting deduction. These premiums are included in Box 1 taxable income, but they don’t count as wages for FICA or Medicare tax.
S Corporations have to either pay the premiums directly or reimburse the shareholder for documented premium payments. The S corporation also must include the payments in Box 1 of the shareholder employee’s W-2. The shareholder must report the W-2 income, but then deduct the premiums on line 29 of their personal return. The net effect of these maneuvers is the same as if the insurance were never included in income in the first place.
Failure to properly include shareholder health insurance on your W-2 will lead to a disallowance of this deduction completely. This has been a requirement from the IRS since 2008 but they are now really beginning to disallow the deduction due to lack of proper reporting.
Robert Whirley CPA
[Alpharetta, GA]
via Susan Willever
LikeLike
8 tax breaks expiring at the end of 2013
From mortgage insurance premiums to teachers’ classroom expenses, don’t miss out on these tax breaks.
http://money.msn.com/taxes/8-tax-breaks-expiring-at-the-end-of-2013-1
Gemma
LikeLike
A few more tips
Check asset allocation
Risk tolerance and investment horizon can change quite a bit in one year. December is a great time to take a look at your portfolio and life situation to see if your target asset allocation needs to be updated. It is important to figure out a target asset allocation that you are comfortable with and stick with it through thick and thin.
Rebalance
The stock market ran up tremendously in 2013. If you haven’t checked your asset allocation lately, it probably deviated significantly from your target. The end of the year is a good time to rebalance your portfolio and bring your asset allocation back on target. Rebalancing will help you stick to your asset allocation target regardless of what the stock market does.
Charles
LikeLike
Potential Tax Developments
This is a very interesting potential development to watch. The case outline below is going before the Supreme Court.
For some doctors and business owners, if the outcome is favorable we will be able to pay employees severance when the need arises, deduct the compensation and the employee will not have to claim the income. Just an interesting FYI.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Obama administration on Tuesday will fight before the Supreme Court to keep a defunct retailer from potentially triggering a wave of tax refund claims that could drain $1 billion from major U.S. social programs.
In oral arguments before the high court, the Obama administration will ask the justices to overturn an appeals court ruling in favor of issuing a tax refund to Quality Stores Inc, a rural retailer that declared bankruptcy in 2001.
Though the tax refund at issue in this case is small – about $1 million – the Obama administration has warned in court filings that the Internal Revenue Service could owe more than $1 billion in thousands of tax refund claims to individuals and businesses if the appeals court ruling is upheld.
At issue is whether severance payments to workers who were involuntarily terminated are taxable under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax, or FICA, which helps pay for Social Security retirement pensions and Medicare health insurance for the aged. FICA taxes are paid by a company and its employees.
Midwest-based Quality Stores served mainly farmers and people in small towns before it shuttered all of its 300 stores. Thousands of workers were laid off with severance pay. The company withheld FICA tax from the severance pay and forwarded the withholdings to the government.
In the case before the Supreme Court, the IRS and Quality Stores are arguing over seemingly contradictory language in the tax code related to severance pay and FICA taxes.
SEVERANCE IN TAX GRAY AREA
One part of the tax code defines wages as “all remuneration for employment.” The severance payments made by Quality Stores were wages and were taxable for FICA purposes, the Obama administration is arguing, according to court filings.
But in a different section of the code, “supplemental unemployment benefits” are exempted from income taxes. Quality Stores has argued that its severance payments are exempt from FICA taxes according to the “SUB payments” definition.
In September 2012, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Quality Stores severance payments to former employees were not wages, and therefore were not taxable under FICA.
In that decision, now before the Supreme Court, the 6th Circuit judges acknowledged the tax code language is “complex” and “the correct resolution of the issue is far from obvious.”
Kristin Hickman, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, said: “Both sides have plausible arguments about how the statutes can be interpreted.”
OUTCOME HARD TO PREDICT
U.S. Deputy Solicitor General Eric Feigin will argue the case for the government. Quality Stores will be represented by Robert Hertzberg, a lawyer with Pepper Hamilton LLP, who will be making his first Supreme Court appearance.
Hundreds of the company’s creditors are paying for legal fees in this case from a bankruptcy trust.
Only eight of the nine justices will hear the oral arguments. President Barack Obama’s most recent court appointee, Justice Elena Kagan, is not taking part in the case. She has been sitting out administration disputes from when she served as U.S. solicitor general before her August 2010 court appointment.
A decision is expected by the end of June. Views were mixed on how the case might be decided.
“The court will be fairly unified and sympathetic to the government,” said Bradley Joondeph, professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law.
Ruth Wimer, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery LLP, said Quality Stores has an advantage because the government’s argument is too simplistic. “The government has a harder argument,” Wimer said. “If the statute were clear, we wouldn’t have all these cases.”
The case is United States v. Quality Stores Inc. No. 12-1408.
(Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Jonathan Oatis)
Bobby Whirley CPA
Whirley & Associates, LLC + ProActive Advisory
LikeLike