Health Plans Draws Fire for Physician Incentives

Doctors May Profit from Generic Drug Switch

Staff Writers 

Several of the nation’s health plans are drawing scrutiny for offering financial incentives to entice doctors to prescribe cheaper generic medicines; according to a recent report from the Wall Street Journal.

This practice includes paying them up to $100 each time they switch a patient from a brand-name drug to a generic equivalent. 

As some pharmaceutical patents for a growing number of blockbuster drugs expire, some health insurers are using doctor-bonuses for writing more generic prescriptions. 

Proponents argue that the goal of saving patients, employers and insurers money is a noteworthy one. Others argue that it is only justified to reimburse doctors for spending time evaluating patients to determine whether a cheaper generic alternative is better – not for paying them for a wholesale switch. 

But aggressive approaches, like cash-rewards for each patient switched from a given list of drugs, are coming under fire for injecting financial incentives into what should be a purely medical decision. 

And, some medical societies are concerned that rewards may put doctors in the ethically questionable position of taking payments that patients know nothing about. 

Conclusion: And so, what are your thoughts on the matter?

Lexicon: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com

 

One Response

  1. Big-Pharma Payola?

    Did you know that according to the Associated Press, some pharmaceutical companies are using legal settlements with generic drug makers to delay the introduction of cheaper medicines? Yep, it sure seems so!

    For example, in a 12-month period that ended last September 30th 2007, 14 of 33 agreements to settle patent litigation between brand-name drug companies and generics included both a restriction on the generic company’s ability to market a drug and compensation to the generic manufacturer.

    The Federal Trade Commission [FTC] maintains that by jamming the pipeline of cheaper drugs, such agreements harm consumers. The agency has sued to block some agreements and is supporting legislation in Congress that would ban the practice.

    What do you think of such drug-induced “greenmail”; scam or legitimate competitive posture?

    Executive-Post
    -Staff Reporters

    Like

Leave a comment