The Leading Business Education Network for Doctors, Financial Advisors and Health Industry Consultants

 Information Restricted to “qualified entities” Only

By Marshall Allen

ProPublica, Sept 15th, 2011, 10:46 am

It’s estimated that hundreds of thousands of patients die annually from preventable harm suffered while undergoing medical care. The infections, injuries and errors could rank as a leading cause of death in the United States.

The PP-ACA of 2010

Last year’s sweeping health-care reform law — the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — promised to improve the problem by allowing outside groups to use Medicare billing records to analyze and publicly report on the quality of care. But proposed rules that would guide the release of the data are being criticized by consumer groups that say the rules would make independent accountability impossible.

CMS  

Agencies typically adopt rules to administer laws like the health-care act. The rules being developed [1] by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) propose restricting the release of Medicare billing data to “qualified entities.” To qualify, a group would have to:

• Pay up to $200,000 for the data.
• Have its methods pre-approved before obtaining the data.
• Already possess billing information from other sources to combine with the Medicare data — an advantage to insurance companies.
• Limit public reporting to quality measures approved by the health-care industry.
• Present its reports and findings to every doctor and facility being measured before they are released to the public — a requirement that would make large-scale reports difficult.

Medicare officials declined to discuss the proposed rules because they are being finalized after a public comment period ended Aug. 8th. But interviews and a review of comments show that the rules have sharply divided consumer-oriented groups and health-care providers.

Safe Patient Project

Lisa McGiffert, director of the Safe Patient Project run by Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports magazine, said the new law was seen as “a real opportunity” because, for the first time, Medicare data could be used to tell the public about the performance of doctors. But the proposed rules would make it impossible for Consumers Union to use the data, she said.

“The best-kept secret inAmericais what doctors are doing,” McGiffert said. “People should be able to find out information about outcomes of care, whether their docs are using appropriate practices and whether they’re providing too much of something that people don’t need.”

Bruce Boissonnault, president and CEO of the Niagara Health Quality Coalition, a nonprofit that’s been independently measuring the quality of health care since 1995, said the rules are needlessly complex and designed to suppress freedom of information. He said the rules would make it impossible for all but industry insiders to access the new data, giving them control over what’s released.

“We will only see the scraps of information that the industry wants us to discuss,” Boissonnault said. “It’s advertising wrapped in a lab coat.”

Boissonnault [2] and Consumers Union [3] submitted public comments, urging Medicare to reconsider the restrictions.

Enter the AMA

The American Medical Association submitted comments [4] mostly supporting the access limitations and in some cases urging more restrictive rules. For instance, the proposed rules say doctors would need 30 days to review any analysis before it’s publicly reported, but the AMA wants that review period increased to 90 days. The AMA also wants Medicare to consider complaints by physicians against an organization before allowing the organization access to the data.

Assessment

The Federation of American Hospitals, which represents investor-owned health-care facilities, said in its comment [5] that it is “very troubled” by the proposed rules, despite the increased restrictions, because billing data have a limited ability to measure quality. The federation wants a limit on the number of qualified entities that have access to the data.

Link: http://www.propublica.org/article/health-care-reform-rules-would-restrict-public-reporting

Conclusion

Your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, subscribe to the ME-P. It is fast, free and secure.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com

Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:

Health Dictionary Series: http://www.springerpub.com/Search/marcinko

Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/product/9780826105752

Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790

Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421

Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com

Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com

Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.

Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos

Sponsors Welcomed: And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.

Link: https://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise

Filed under: Ethics, Professional Liability, Quality Initiatives | Tagged: AMA, “qualified entities”, Bruce Boissonnault, CMS, Federation of American Hospitals, Health-Care Reform Rules, Lisa McGiffert, Marshall Allen, National Practitioner Data Bank, Niagara Health Quality Coalition, NPDB, ProPublica |